You are on page 1of 12

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/327645389

Internet Marketing vs Traditional Marketing: A Comparative Analysis

Article · September 2018

CITATIONS READS

2 12,321

1 author:

Sanjay Bhayani
Saurashtra University
11 PUBLICATIONS   22 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Sanjay Bhayani on 14 September 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Research

Internet Marketing vs
Traditional Marketing:
A Comparative Analysis
Abstract by Sanjay Bhayani & Nishant V. Vachhani
Marketing goods is a basic phenomenon of every society. The objective of marketing is to make products available to
consumers as per the current demand. Marketing is no more a simple exercise. It has undergone changes to reach
consumers. Marketing has been done physically since long. Consumers are becoming smarter in terms of purchasing.
This requires innovation in marketing. This paper helps us to identify preferences of the people. Prime focus is to
understand the difference between conventional way of marketing products and technological way of marketing
products in India.
The current paper recognizes the differences in consumer opinions by availing distinguished services of
traditional as well as internet marketing strategies. Internet is changing ways to reach consumer fast and is a more
convenient way than customary means of marketing. Internet offers 24x7, 365 days a year web facilities which is more
convenient for consumers these days. Consumers are becoming more Information Technology (IT) savvy in their
searching as well as purchasing preferences. No doubt, ecommerce is not yet considered safe in India, but cyber has a
highly vibrant and potential market in coming days to win eyeballs of Indians.

Keywords
Ecommerce, Information Technology, Cyber, Web
Introduction
In traditional marketing we attempt to make the public aware that we have a product or service for sale. As per online
review article by McCauley, D. (2013), in traditional marketing, using traditional marketing tools such as television, radio or direct
mail, we can expect a response rate of somewhere between 0.5% and 2% on outbound messages. In other words, if we get that
message out to 1000 people, we can expect between 5 and 20 people to respond.
Viewed in another way, if we hope to get 100 responses, we must contact somewhere between 5,000 and 20,000 people. (Of
course these are broad averages and may be slightly different depending on product, target market and other variables). In
traditional marketing, we use specific tools which hit very large audiences. These include:
Television
Radio
Newspapers
Magazines
Direct Mail
Trade Shows
Today we know that a huge percentage of buyers use the Internet when making purchasing decisions. Even those who
still buy in the 'real world' locally often use the Internet to make decisions prior to buying. They will use computers, tablets, readers
and cell phones to search, do some related research perhaps and then buy.
While Internet marketing presents a much larger opportunity, Internet marketing is in many ways a mirror, or reverse
image of traditional marketing.
The nature of the web, with its two-way communication features and traceable connection technology, allows firms to

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014 53


Research

gather much more information about customer behavior The 4 Ps concepts provide clear idea about the
and references than they can gather using micromarketing contrast between traditional marketing and eMarketing
approaches. Now, companies can measure large number of concepts. It considers several vital facets of the contrast
things that are happening, as customer and potential between these two diversifications of the marketing.
customers gather information and make purchasing
decisions. The information that a web site can gather about Product
its visitors is called a click stream. Product is the most significant component of
The idea of technology-enabled relationship marketing. Whenever consumer purchases a product,
management has become possible when promoting and he/she likes to see the product physically. This is feasible in
selling on the web. Technology-enabled relationship the case of conventional, customary & traditional
management occurs when a firm obtains detailed marketing. However in eMarketing it is not feasible to get
information about a customer's behavior, preferences, the actual touch of the product. Instead they can only see an
needs, and buying patterns , and uses that information to implicit image of the product. Not being able to reach and
set prices, negotiate terms, tailor promotions, add product feel the product physically, can be worrisome for the
features, and otherwise customize its entire relationship consumer and have an effect on his/her purchasing
with that customer. decision. However, eMarketing websites offers a wider
Technology-enabled relationship Traditional relationships
Dimensions
management with customers
Advertising Provide information in response to Push and sell a uniform
specific customer inquiries message to all customers
Targeting Identify and respond to specific Market segmentations
customer behaviors and preferences
Promotions and discounts offered Individually tailored to customer Same for all customers
Distribution channels Direct or through intermediaries; Through intermediaries
customers' choice chosen by the seller
Pricing of products or services Negotiated with each customer Set by the seller for all customers
New product features Created in response to customer demands Determined by the seller based
on research and development
Measurement used to manage the Customer retention; total value of the Market share; profit
customer relationship individual customer relationship

Table 1 : Technology-Enabled Relationship Management and Traditional CRM


Although companies can use technology-enabled range of goods & services which are easily available, as
relationship management concepts to help manage compared to physical stores. Stores have to deal with issues
relationships with vendors, employees, and other of cost and space unlike eMarketing websites.
stakeholders, most companies currently use these concepts One of the main aspects is how online services
to manage customer relationships. Thus, technology- delivered to customers. In online, the more difficult to
enabled relationship management is often called customer provide face-to-face contact facility to consumers whereas
relationship management (CRM), technology-enabled in the case of physical store it is consumer is face to face
relationship management or electronic customer with the seller. The consumer can get a quicker response in
relationship management (eCRM). Table 1 lists seven physical store than the online store. Online business can
dimensions of the customer interaction experience and provide facilities like email, chat option, FAQ etc to remain
shows how technology-enabled relationship management responsive to their consumers.
differs from traditional seller-customer interactions in each One issue that can affect the consumers' choice of
of those dimensions. purchase is the warranty of the good. This provides comfort
to consumers, both in customary & traditional marketing
and eMarketing but most importantly it provides the safe
and sound feeling to those purchasing online. The

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014


Research

consumer who cannot see and touch the product while Promotion
purchasing it would feel more safe and sound knowing When it comes to endorsement and promotion,
that there is a warranty on the product and this would speed in getting the message across varies in traditional
make the choice of purchase easier and less risky. and internet marketing. Speed of getting the message of
advertisement, news or any type of information to
Price consumers is very quick through Internet. This is a very
The pricing of a product can be based on the cost important in the competitive world of business.
of the process of getting the product to the market. While Additionally, difference between endorsement
a business does eMarketing it has a better prospect of and promotion by Internet is the durability of the
saving costs and therefore feasibility to have lower marketing message the marketer wants to communicate
prices. Internet based marketing sites not only save on with the consumers. In conventional, customary &
cost spent on storing the product, but also uses cheap traditional manner, the message would receive attention
mode of communication like email. Competition is very during a limited amount of time like in case of
tough as the competitors are a click away while a advertisements aired on TV or sent out in newspapers
potential consumer is searching for information on the and pamphlets. On the other hand, the marketer's
Internet. message to the consumers can exist for longer duration
Since payments for purchase are done by credit on the business's website and it is easily reached and
card mostly, there can be some security issues that cause handy to the consumers 24/7.
problems for internet buyers. For instance a consumer Through a website, a business can present itself
would feel safer in the physical store where they can have in several ways where the consumer can study different
more control over the payment process; whereas facets of the business and get to know it well. This is not
purchasing online they would be taking a risk while feasible in conventional, customary & marketing. For
giving the credit card details. instance the complexity of wide range of information
cannot be easily fitted into a magazine or TV commercial
Place etc. The tools for customary & traditional endorsement
In conventional, customary & traditional and promotion can be used essentially in communicating
marketing, companies have the opportunities to the message shortly and consistently.
decorate the stores in order to create a specific There is of course the burden of maintaining a
atmosphere that can attract consumers. Some attractive website or online commercials that consumes time,
tools to create that atmosphere can be music, colors, etc, resources and capital. But this should be weighted out by
but through eMarketing it is almost not possible to create their easy accessibility and better prospect. Additional
a real sensation since a website is just a virtual image issue is the damage that a failed or crashed website or
The atmosphere of the store mentioned above is other Internet service can have on a business's image.
very important for sales of the goods & services. For A good website is very important for succeeding
instance if you see an unorganized store just filled up in online marketing. According to Times of India, some
with some clothes you hardly feel tempted to go in and important course of action for a good website for a
look for anything. The way the store is decorated business is:
provides a message about the business and its style. “Provide clear information on contacts, delivery and
While one thinks about this, one can realize the refund policies.”
importance of the physical existence of the store. Think “Think “user journey” rather than individual pages.”
for instance how the business could offer the same “Let shoppers browse without having to register.”
atmosphere through their website. For instance we can “Keep websites simple and easy to use.”
consider H&M. They try to create the same atmosphere “Offer an efficient and effective search engine.”
on their website as they have in their real stores. Despite
“Market the website online and link it to search
this, the experience of stepping into the store is differs
engines.”
from clicking on computer while shopping.
“Make obtainable and provide steadiness of know-
Internet helps companies to be reachable at any
time, regardless of openings hours that physical stores how.”
require. Also a website has a wider reach as compared to “If the Internet does not offer the full bricks-and-
a locality based store with a physical address. mortar range, say so.”
“Give complaints ID numbers.”
”Build trust.”

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014 55


Research

Nowadays a large group of consumers have the According to Yazdanifard, R., Venpin, M., Wan
problem of time but have the money to spend. It is easier Yusoff, Wan F. & Rabiul Islam, M. (2013) Internet
for them to shop online, as it saves time. Good website marketing is an interesting topic especially for
design, accessing speed, brand value is important factors researchers in the marketing field. It is a new way of
in online business otherwise failure in this can damage marketing a product/service globally to the targeted
the profit of online business. Internet provides the market around the world. This paper introduces a new
marketer to reach the targeted group easily and have approach concerning Internet marketing in electronic
continues relationship with them. commerce; showing how advertisers need this
innovation to be successful. This also relieves marketing
Literature Review managers for more value added tasks such as marketing
There are many researches and studies about plans for better development of the company.
the comparison between traditional marketing and According to Stuart E. J. (2014) day by day there
modern marketing and also advantages and is upward growth of online services in regular usages by
disadvantages of internet marketing, which shows the consumers. However, traditional marketers somehow
performances and its efficiency. do not want to admit that the world changed. They are
Chaston and Mangles (2003), examined the slow in taking advantages of new opportunities
influence of marketing style on the utilization of the presented to them. B2B-enhances supply chain process
Internet among small UK manufacturing firms. They need to pay much attention to real-world business
employed a quantitative methodology to determine process, adapt automated systems to business behavior
whether, in business-to-business markets, the Internet is and mingle content and technologies with crucial
a technology that will be managed differently by firms information systems.
that have adopted a relationship versus a transactional Hoge's (1993) idea of internet marketing is
marketing orientation. The research was conducted simple although it does not touch the important aspect of
through mailed questionnaires on a sample of 298 UK customer relationship. Strauss and Ansary (2006)
small firms (manufacturers of mechanical or electronic defined internet marketing in their latest book as the use
components / their primary area of activity is business of information technology in the process of creating,
to-business marketing / have between 10-50 employees communicating, and delivering value to customers, and
/ not branch plants of British or multinational for managing customer relationships in ways that benefit
organizations). Insufficient evidence was found to the organization and its stake holders. This explanation
support the view that relationship-orientated firms, tells that internet marketing is not only about selling
when compared with transaction ally-orientated products or providing services through IT but it is lot
competitors, exhibit differing perceptions about the more than that. It is not just traditional marketing using
nature of online markets. the information technology tools but it's a strategic
In this modern age of internet almost every model to achieve brand value and provide customer
progressive business has web presence, some people satisfaction. Idea of internet marketing can be derived as
think that website is just a commercial requirement but type of marketing in which objectives are achieved
others think that it is mandatory to run their company through use of electronic communication tools like
activities. These different theories about internet have internet, interactive TV and mobile phones.
been discussed a lot in recent marketing literature. In the Dave Chaffey (2002) defines internet marketing
past decade marketers has been arguing about the role of as “Applying Digital technologies which form online
internet in marketing. Initially marketers used internet channels (Web, e-mail, databases, plus mobile/wireless
as communication tool but as time passed they realized & digital TV) to contribute to marketing activities aimed
the true potential of internet and the idea of internet at achieving profitable acquisition and retention of
marketing evolved. According to Hoge (1993), Internet customers (within a multi-channel buying process and
marketing (IM) is the transfer of goods or services from customer lifecycle) through improving our customer
seller to buyer that involves one or more electronic knowledge (of their profiles, behaviour, value and loyalty
methods or media. It has begun with the use of drivers), then delivering integrated targeted
telegraphs in the nineteenth century. With the advent communications and online services that match their
and mass acceptance of the telephone, radio, television, individual needs.” Chaffey's definition reflects the
and then cable, electronic media have become the relationship marketing concept, it emphasis that it
dominant marketing force. should not be technology that drives Electronic
marketing, but the business model.

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014


Research

Salehi, M., Mirzaei, H., & Aghaei, M. (2012) Traditional Marketing Internet Marketing
compares both internet based as well as traditional
marketing, Internet Marketing is more economical and Physical access to product Wide range of product
faster way to reach out to buyer directly, and is the ideal Personal service More feasibility to cut cost
way for business to advertise locally or internationally. As Quick feedback Easier to reach more consumers
the result in case of comparison; both types of marketing
Less tough competition Faster speed of communication
can help traders and marketers to do business. Each has
& shopping
advantages and disadvantages. In traditional marketing
consumers can see and touch the real goods or service More safe and sound payment Feasibility to present business
but the domain of effect is low, on the other hand using of (its image, offers, history etc.)
internet marketing will exceed the boundaries and Atmosphere of physical store 24 x 7 access
introduce goods and services to the demographic of (more real)
internet users. Also using the internet would be more
Face to face communication Communication directly with
chipper, faster and convenient for marketing.
target group
Approximately the advantages of internet marketing are
much more than advantages of traditional marketing. Quicker & easier measurement Feasibility for continuous
Table 2 identifies the core differences between of results/responds relationship
traditional marketing and internet marketing.
Table 2 : The Contrast Model
Making the marketing objectives successful is
the common goal that each and every company aims at. marketing and traditional marketing can bring the very
They want to enhance the old relationship with best result to a business. Nevertheless, eMarketing solely
consumers, create new ones, amplify and raise the sales is also powerful and it can maximize effectiveness in the
and become famous in the market. (Salehi, M., Mirzaei, H., Internet environment.
& Aghaei, M.,2012) Integration between Internet

Online PR Online Partnership


Search Engine Marketing Portal presentation Affiliate marketing
Search engine optimisation (SEO) Social media blog, feeds and Sponsorship
Pay per click (PPC) communities Co-branding
Trusted feed Media alerting services Link building
Brand protection Widget marketing

Website
&
Partner Micro Websites

Interactive Ads Opt in E-mail Viral Marketing


Website specific media buys House list e-mails Pass along e-mails
Ad networks Cold (rented list) Buzz marketing
Contra-deals Co-branded Generating media mentions
Sponsorship Advertisements in third party e-
Behavioral targeting newsletters

Figure 1 : Six Categories of E-Communications Tools for Media Channels

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014 57


Research

Figure 1 shows the six main types of digital media As per Wixom & Todd (2005), there are some elements
communications channels, and the proper use of these that affect the organic listings such as content, keyword,
techniques together with a good website can help inbound links, tags and the page rank of a website, and so
companies to draw the traffic as well as achieving the on. The work of a business is trying to get as high ranking
eMarketing objectives they have set up. as feasible on the result page and improving those
elements concerned. Zingale & Arndt (2001) argue that
Search Engine Marketing (SEM) higher ranking make running a website more feasible
Search engine marketing (SEM) is an important (Pay-per-click vs. Organic SEO).
channel of eMarketing. It includes three main techniques
Percent
viz. Search engine optimization (SEO), Paid per Click July 2008 July 2009
Change
(PPC) and Trusted feeds which includes Paid-for-
Total Internet 80,554 1113,685 41 %
inclusion. These elements of search engine marketing
can help companies to amplify and raise their visibility Google Websites 48,666 76,684 58 %
on the search engine as well as spread their names to Yahoo! Websites 8,689 8,898 02 %
several populaces. (McKinney, V., Yoon, K., and Zahedi, F. Baidu.com Inc. 7,413 7,976 08 %
M. 2002), Moreover, they can make provide the chances Microsoft Websites 2,349 3,317 41 %
for companies to bring in and launch new goods and
eBay 1,223 1,723 41 %
services to make the sales and finally bring profits.
NHN Corporation 1,243 1,526 23 %
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Ask Network 929 1,291 39 %
Before we define Search engine optimization, let Yandex 663 1,290 94 %
us take a look at what the search engine means. (Tubar, E., AOL LLC 1,148 1,023 -11 %
Lee, J., King, D. & Chung, H. M., 2000) “Search engine is a Facebook.com 743 879 18 %
website or a statistics and database, along with the tools
to generate that statistics and database and search it Table 3 : World Wide Search Market Overview
contents for “keywords” that describe what you're
looking for” (Arora, N., 2004). Search engine In July 2009, approximately 113 billion searches
optimization (SEO) is a popular and familiar term on the were made all over the world. (Table 3) We can see that
Internet. It is also considered to be “the practice of despite the differences between the number in July over
making a website attractive to a search engine by two years i.e. 2008 and 2009, Google search engine is the
presenting its code and content in such a way that the top ranked search engine, which takes about 67.5 %
search engine will assume it will address a specific market share (counted 76.7 billion searches). Yahoo with
inquiry from a (human) searcher” (Charlesworth, 2009). 7.8% (8.9 billion searches) comes second, and the third
SEO is the key activity of search engine one is Baidu which is from China with 7.0% (8 billion
marketing. This technique is preferable to use even they searches). (Google Commands 67% of Glob-al Search
are the big companies or the small and every one Share.
businesses. Search engine optimization optimizes
business web pages in the search engines to give good Paid Per Click (PPC) or Paid Search Marketing
results. The idea of Paid per Click (PPC) was created by
As per Davis (1989), Indeed, SEO is the process Overture in 1998, a business which works in the Internet
of choosing the most relevant websites and adjusting industry that was acquired later by Yahoo in 2003. (Liu, C.
websites in result pages while the searchers type a and Arnett, K. P., 2000) PPC is based on the concept of
keyword related to it. SEO can enhance the number of paying nominal amount per click with respect to search
traffic as well as its quality to a website. The results here results. The method is a good and successful in online
appear in the “organic search results” or sometimes marketing; and it has become widespread on the Internet
called “natural search results”. Nevertheless, a business market nowadays.
cannot pay for the search engine to get the high ranking in Pay per Click is defined as “the performance-
the list of results. For instance, Google cannot take money based publicity and advertising where the advertiser
from businesses to do that. It has to provide suitable pays for each click”. (Chaffey, 2002) The advertiser has to
results for the searchers to keep them use its search pay for the search engine so that his advertisement will
engine. Otherwise, they will leave it. be listed in the search engine result pages or in third

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014


Research

party websites. Nevertheless, the advertiser does not price to use Paid Inclusion is still one of its disadvantages
need to pay while the ad is displayed; he only pays while a as it is quite high. For instance, Inktomi charges $89 as a
user clicks on an ad and it leads to the website of the total fee for three pages to apply the Paid Inclusion
advertiser. (Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W., technique.
2003) There is a sign to recognize those companies who
use the PPC method. For instance, there is a user who Online Public Relations (Online PR)
searches some information about a business on the Public relation is one marketing communication
search engine; the lists of the relevant text channel with the purpose to create promote, maintain
advertisements with a link to companies' page will be the goodwill, favorable image, and reputation for
shown in the result pages. In the Google result pages organization, brand, etc. toward different stake-holders.
those advertisements are placed in the right side and in (Kalakota, Dr. R., and Robinson M., 2009) The stakeholder
the top of the organic results with the marks “Sponsored is sometimes called public or target addressees. They are
Links” above it. investors, suppliers, consumers, employees, and so on.
In Paid per Click you can bid on keyword to get The goal of public relations is usually gained by the
the high ranking. “The relative ranking of these paid influence of the different media.
performance placements is typically based on the highest Online public relations mean establishing web
bid cost-per-click value for each key phrase. The business hyperlinks to provide detailed information about goods
which is prepared to pay the most per click gets top spot” and services to their potential consumers. (Chaffey,
(Chaffey 2002). Indeed, it is competitive for the 2002) The purpose of online PR in general is similar to
companies to join this program. The result appears in the conventional, customary & traditional public relations.
part of Paid per Click advertisements. The more capital a Its main objectives are to enhance the awareness as well
business pays for each click, the higher position of as “maximizing favorable mentions of your business,
advertisements will be displayed in the result pages. brands, goods & services or websites on third party
Those companies which have big budgets and bid with websites which are probably to be visited by your target
higher prices have more advantages than the smaller buyers. A secondary goal is achieving links to a
ones. destination website” (Chaffey, 2002). Those objectives
can be obtained by several tools and techniques that
Trusted Feed Including Paid for Inclusion Internet offers.
Trusted feed, which it is also called as XML feed,
is a type of search marketing. It is “an automated method Research Methodology
of putting content into a paid search engine or shopping Main objective of doing this research is to
contrast engine index, and typically using XML measure the differences between internet marketing and
(Extensible Markup Language) to define statistics and traditional marketing in Gujarat, India.
facts exchange” (Chaffey, 2002). Nevertheless, it is rarely
used than the two techniques mentioned above. Research Objectives
The program improves the indexing of a website Specifically, research objectives are as below:
which has a large content by using the spider built search To measure the market penetration of internet
engine. (Jarvenpaa & Todd, 1997). As a result, the search marketing with compare to traditional marketing.
engine will index the content of a website deeply, and To know an awareness of internet marketing to
makes a better target traffic. Business pays for the service purchase online with compare to traditional
only if there is traffic coming to its website. Normally, it marketing.
does not pay for each page like in Paid Inclusion whether To understand the consumer buying patterns
there is traffic to a website or not. Nevertheless, the through internet marketing options with compare to
program does not guarantee for the web pages to get high traditional marketing.
ranking in the result page. To explore the various utilities of internet marketing
There are some companies which provide the with compare to traditional marketing.
Paid Inclusion program such as Inktomi, Fast, Teoma and To decide the online catalog preferences of
Ask Jeeves, AltaVista and Over tune of Yahoo. Yet, Google consumers.
does not offer the program. A business usually pays for
the Paid Inclusion program annually. It is cheaper than Research Design
use paid placement program such as PPC. Nevertheless, Research design constitutes the blueprint for the
data collection, measurement and analysis of data. In this

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014 59


Research

study the researcher analyzed internet marketing accept or reject the null hypothesis H0 or alternative
preferences with compared to traditional marketing hypothesis Ha. Following is the list of hypothesis used to
preferences among the consumers of Gujarat state. This verify in this research study.
is a descriptive research study. H01: There is no significant difference between
Research study describes the buying patterns of internet buying preferences & personal buying
consumers. Descriptive research includes surveys & fact- preferences.
finding enquiries of sampled respondents. The main H02: There is no significant difference between
characteristic of this method is that the researcher has no eCatalog preferences & Catalog preferences.
control over the variables; he can only report what has H03: E-purchasing is independent of traditional
happened or what is happening. purchasing
Sampling Method Hypothesis Testing: Internet buying Prefe-
The sample was selected randomly from the sub- rence Vs. Personal Purchasing Preference
geographical urban areas of Ahmedabad, Baroda, Surat, In this hypothesis, researcher used one of the
and Rajkot in Gujarat State. non-parametric test (distribution free) test which
McNemer Test. This test is useful with before-after
Sample Size measurement of the same number of respondents.
In this study, 500 respondents were considered Initially, respondents are divided into equal groups as to
to measure an impact of internet marketing among them. their preferable and non-preferable views. After some
Since the focus of this study is on different attitudes and treatment, the same number of respondents are asked to
perceptions about online purchasing, only Internet savvy express their views whether they prefer or don't prefer.
respondents were considered. In this test researcher used Internet buying preference
and personal buying preference criteria to know any
Sources of Data
difference between the traditional style of purchasing
To accomplish the objectives of the study, the and modern style of purchasing among the 500 number
researcher had to depend on both the primary and of respondents. Table 4 provides the descriptive
secondary data. Primary data are those which are statistics where sizes of sample, mean, standard
collected afresh and for the first time and thus happen to deviation as well as percentiles are calculated.
be original in character. Secondary, data are those which Table 5 provides the McNemer data table for
have already been collected by someone else and which internet buying and personal buying preference values of
have already been passes on through the statistical 500 respondents. In this Table, 211 respondents says
process. The secondary data needed for the study was that they prefer internet buying option as well as
collected from the relevant online research thesis, online personal buying option, 116 respondents says that they
research articles, journals, books, magazines & websites. prefer internet buying option but not personal buying
Researcher has approached 500 respondents to get data option, 111 respondents says that they prefer personal
as per questionnaire.
Percentile
50th
N Mean SD Min Max 25th 75th
(Median)
INTERNET BUYING_PREF 500 1.35 .476 1 2 1.00 1.00 2.00
PERSONAL_BUYING_PREF 500 1.36 .479 1 2 1.00 1.00 2.00

Table 4 : Descriptive Statistics

buying option but not internet buying option, and 62


Research Hypothesis respondents says that they do not like internet buying
Research hypothesis provides the base to derive the option as well as personal buying option.
research conclusions. It was preferred to test hypothesis
at significance level (α) of 5% and at confidence level (1-
α) of 95%. This allowed to fix the acceptance region is
equal to 95% & the rejection region is equal to 5% to

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014


Research

PERSONAL_BUYING_PREF ECATALOG_PREF
INTERNET BUYING_PREF CATALOG_PREF
1 2 1 2

1 211 116 1 244 117


2 111 62 2 124 15

Table 5 : Internet buying and Personal Buying Table 8 : Catalog Preference and E-Catalog
Preference Preference
Table 6 represents McNemer Test statistics
which point probability 0.05 and its less than 0.5 mean Table 8 provides the McNemer data table for e-
null hypothesis is accepted and alternate hypothesis is catalog and catalog preference values of 500
rejected. It means there is no difference in internet respondents. In this Table 244 respondents says that
buying preference and personal buying preference; more they prefer catalog option as well as e-catalog option, 117
or less both are same. respondents says that they prefer catalog option but not
e-catalog option, 124 respondents says that they prefer
N 500 e-catalog option but not catalog option, and 15
Chi-Square .070 respondents says that they do not like e-catalog option as
Asymp. Sig. .791 well as catalog option.
Exact Sig. (2-tailed) .791
N 500
Exact Sig. (1-tailed) .395
Chi-Square .149
Point Probability .050
Exact Sig. (2-tailed) .699
Table 6 : McNemer Test Statistics
Exact Sig. (1-tailed) .350

Hypothesis Testing: Catalog Preference Point Probability .046

Vs. E-Catalog Preference Table 9 : McNemer Test Statistics


In this hypothesis, researcher used McNemer
Test, a non-parametric test (distribution free). This test is Table 9 represents McNemer Test statistics
useful with before-after measurement of the same which point probability 0.046 and its less than 0.5 mean
number of respondents. In this test researcher used E- null hypothesis is accepted and alternate hypothesis is
catalog preference and catalog preference criteria to rejected. It means there is no difference in e-catalog and
know any difference between the traditional style of catalog preference; more or less both are same.
purchasing and modern style of purchasing among the
500 number of respondents. Initially, respondents were Hypothesis Testing: Traditional Purchasing
divided into equal groups with respect to their preferable Weightage Vs. E-Purchasing Weightage
and non-preferable views. After some treatment, the
same numbers of respondents were asked to express In this hypothesis, researcher used two tests
their preferences. where first is Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and second is
the two sample sign test. Here both the test is non-
parametric test. Researcher used weightage (score) of
Percentile
traditional purchasing option and e-purchasing option to
50th
N Mean SD Min Max 25th 75th verify hypothesis. With the size of 500 sampling
(Median)
respondents mean score of traditional purchasing is
CATALOG_PREFE 500 1.28 .448 1 2 1.00 1.00 2.00
54.25 which is less compare to the mean score 57.04 of E-
CATALOG_PREF 500 1.26 .441 1 2 1.00 1.00 2.00 purchasing. This indicates consumers are inclined more
Table 7 : Descriptive Statistics towards the E-purchasing than the traditional
purchasing. Moreover, standard deviation is also high in
Table 7 provides the descriptive statistics where case of traditional purchasing than the E-purchasing.
sizes of sample, mean, standard deviation as well as This S.D. also indicates the consumers are changing their
percentiles are calculated. buying preferences more frequently in traditional
purchasing with compare to E-purchasing.

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014 61


Research

Percentile
50th
N Mean SD Min Max 25th 75th
(Median)
TRADITIONAL_PUR_SCORE 500 54.25 21.699 10 90 40.00 55.00 75.00
E_PUR_SCORE 500 57.04 20.874 10 90 40.00 60.00 75.00

Table 10 : Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics are provided in the Table Table 13 provides two sample sign test
10 which provides information of several important frequency data. In this test total size of sample (N) is 500
statistics like Size of Universe (N), Mean of the data, where 187 are the negative differences of two samples
Standard Deviation (S.D.) of the data & Percentiles values. and 261 are positive differences of two samples. The
sample number one provides the score of e-purchasing
Mean Sum of
N Rank Rank
option and sample number two provides the score of the
traditional purchasing option.
E_PUR_SCORE - Negative Ranks 187 237.20 44357.00
TRADITIONAL_PUR_SCORE Positive Ranks 261 215.40 56219.00 E_PUR_SCORE -
TRADITIONAL_PUR_SCORE
Ties 52
Z -3.449
Total 500
Exact Sig. (2-tailed) .001
Table 11 : Wilcoxon Signed Ranks
Exact Sig. (1-tailed) .000
Table 11 provides details of Wilcoxon signed Point Probability .000
ranks where total size of population is 500 but negative
ranks are 187 in number as well as positive ranks are 261 Table 14 : Two Sample Sign Test Statistics
in number. In this count, 52 are the total number of ties in In Table 14, p-value is 0 mean null hypothesis is
population. Mean rank for the negative rank value is accepted means internet marketing is independent than
237.20 and for positive rank value is 215.40. Total sum of traditional marketing and it has more preferred value
ranks for negative rank value is 44357.00 and for positive with compare to traditional marketing.
rank value are 56219.00.
Conclusion
E_PUR_SCORE - Internet is considered as change agent for Indian
TRADITIONAL_PUR_SCORE
consumer market. But if we see the results with empirical
Z -2.166 evidences, it is bit controversial as far as general
p- value .030 tendency is concerned about purchasing through the
Table 12 : Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test Statistics medium of an internet. Internet buying preferences
doesn't change mentality of consumer as people prefer
In the Table 12, value of Z is -2.166 and p-value is traditional ways more and safe to their purchasing
.030 which is less than .05 mean null hypothesis is transactions. If we look at the preferences towards a
accepted but alternate hypothesis is rejected. It means E- utilization of catalogue source of information, it is
purchasing option and traditional purchasing option are preferred to have internet based purchasing details for
not same in preference and independent of each other. consumers to choose products to be purchased. As far as
the comparison of internet preferences are concerned, it
is not associated in any way with conventional way of
N marketing goods. Internet marketing stands alone in its
E_PUR_SCORE - Negative Differences 187 way. After studying about statistical results, it is clearly
TRADITIONAL_ Positive Differences 261 understandable that more number of consumers of
PUR_SCORE Ties 52
selected cities of Gujarat like to connect themselves with
online purchasing options. It suggests that online
Total 500
marking is more prolific as compared to physical
Table 13 : Two Sample Sign Test Frequencies purchasing. It is observed that electronic catalog facilities
are more preferred by consumers to obtain adequate
details about buyable goods as well as services with

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014


Research

compare to physical catalogs. Lastly, highest score goes to Authors’ Profile


internet as the most preferred way of purchasing than the Dr. Sanjay Bhayani, M.Com, M.Phil., Ph.D., Professor
(Management) Department of Business Management, (MBA
physical stores. So, online businesses will be having the Programme) Saurashtra University, Rajkot is a Gold Medalist in
golden future in coming days specifically in Gujarat. B.Com. and M.Com. Exams. He has been in academics for more
than thirteen years. He has a number of independent empirical
research publication in reputed journals and presented papers
References & Links in national and international conferences. He has published six
Arora, N. (2004). Trends in Online Publicity and Advertising. Publicity books and authors a few cases. He is Chief Editor of Journal of Commerce and
and advertising Express. Accounting Research, published by publishing India Group, Delhi and an
editor of “Journal of Management Trends” published by Department of
Chaffey, D. (2002). Achieving marketing objectives through use of
Business Management, Saurashtra University, Rajkot and also an advisory
electronic communications technology. editorial member in various reputed International and National Journals. His
Chaston , I., & Mangles, T. (2003). Relationship Marketing in Online current teaching and research interest include Capital Market, Finance and
Bbusiness-to-Business Markets: A Pilot Investigation of Small UK Control. He has successfully guided several research scholars leading to award
Manufacturing Firms. European Journal of Marketing, 37(5/6), 753 - of Ph.D. He has received six national awards for excellence in his research
773. work. He has completed three major research projects funded by UGC, AICTE
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and User and ICSSR. He can be reached at sanjaybhayani@yahoo.com
Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Dr. Nishant Vachhani is Assistant Professor at M.B.A.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in
Department, Atmiya Institute of Technology & Science (AITS),
Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. Rajkot. He did his B.Tech, in Electronics and Communication,
Hoge, S., & Cecil , C. (1993). The Electronic Marketing Manual. ABA from S.S. Engineering College, Bhavnagar University, and MBA
Journal, 22, 175-185. in Marketing from Saurashtra University. Recently, he has
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1997). Consumer Reactions To Electronic completed his Ph.D. in the area “eMarketing” from Saurashtra
Shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic University, Rajkot. He has more than 10 years of teaching experience in diverse
Commerce, 2, 59-88. disciplines of management and engineering. He has published many
Kalakota, R., & Robinson , M. (2009). e-Business 2.0. New Delhi: Pearson researcher papers in reputed journals; participated in several seminars,
Education Inc. conferences and workshops: state-level, national-level and international; and
has already authored three books. He has also conducted Faculty Development
Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with
57 Program (FTP), in collaboration with Gujarat Technological University,
Website success in the context of electronic commerce. Info & Mng, Ahmedabad, One day national seminar on “Writing Research Paper” in
38(1), 23-33. collaboration with Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad and Short-
McCauley, D. (2013) Internet marketing vs traditional marketing - 3 Term Training Program (STTP) on “Advance Research Statistics” in
key points for small businesses, retrieved from http://www.examiner. collaboration with Saurashtra University, Rajkot. He has been awarded as “The
com/article/internet-marketing-vs-traditional-marketing-3-key- Best Researcher” by Learning Resource Center (LRC), AITS, Rajkot. He can be
points-for-small-businesses reached at nvvachhani@aits.edu.in
McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahed, F. M. (2002). The Measurement of Web-
Customrr Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach.
Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315.
Salehi, M., Mirzaei, H., & Aghaei, M. (2012). Dissimilarity of E-
marketing Vs. Traditional Marketing, International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 1,
retrieved from http://www.wnim.com/archive/issue2904/
emarketing.htm.
Stuart, E. J. (2014). New Media: Debunking theMyths. Journal of
Business Strategy, 31(1), 56-58.
Tubar E, Lee J, King D and Chung H.M. (2000). Electronic Commerce,
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wixom, B.H., & Todd, P.A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User
Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance, Information Systems
Research, Vol.16, No.1, 85-102.
Yazdanifard, R., Venpin, M., Wan Yusoff, Wan F. & Rabiul Islam, M.
(2013). Enhanced Framework for Building Successful Website for
Informative Companies, International Conference on Software and
Computer Applications IPCSIT vol.9, Singapore, IACSIT Press,
Zingale, A., & Arndt, M. (2001). Emotion: Engaging Customer Passion
with e-CRM. England, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

FIIB Business Review. Volume 3, Issue 3, July - September 2014 63

View publication stats

You might also like