Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moorthy Paper - Stiffened Cylinder
Moorthy Paper - Stiffened Cylinder
Research Paper
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF GRID STIFFENED
COMPOSITE STRUCTURE OF UNDER WATER VEHICLE
G.Moorthy, Dr. H.N. Narasimha Murthy, Dr. M. Krishna
the strength of the shell. Thus, an attempt has been Table 3.1.1 represents the results obtained by using
made in this paper to model and analyze a typical laminates of thickness varying from 3.5 mm to 6.5
UUV structure for buckling with inclusion of mm. We observe that the critical buckling pressure
transverse shear deformation using FEA. increases as the thickness of the lamina increases.
2. SHELL MODELING CONSIDERATIONS The increase in thickness of the shell requires extra
A geometrical model of the UUV structure with a material which is not economical and that would also
central cylindrical part and two end closures of a half lead to increase in weight to the UUV structure. Here
sphere and a conical structure but here we considered critical buckling pressure is predicted through Finite
only the cylindrical part because that prone more to element analysis, the Critical Buckling Pressure
the buckling. The cylindrical shell is considered to be values for the model with 3.5 mm and 6.5 mm
made up of 10 to 15 plies with the main direction thickness is shown in Fig: 3.1.2
coincident with the hoop direction. The material Table 3.1.1: Critical Buckling Pressure values for
properties considered in this study is shown in Table unstiffened cylinder-Glass/Epoxy
2.1 for a fibre to resin ratio of 70:30 [3]. The
Material considered here is orthotropic in nature; the
model is discritised using Shell 99 elements and the
resultant meshed model consisting of around 3000
shell elements. In the buckling analysis the model has
been solved for the Eigen values that are scale factors
that multiply the applied load in order to produce the
critical buckling load. In general, the lowest buckling
order is of interest, since the structure will fail before
reaching the higher order buckling loads. Hence only
the lowest Eigen value has been computed.
Table 2.1 Orthotropic Mechanical Properties of Glass/
Epoxy Composites
CONCLUSIONS:
In this paper, analysis of the critical buckling
pressure of ring stiffened and unstiffened cylinders
have been carried out based on hydrostatic pressure.
It has been found that for the same lamina thickness,
a stiffened cylinder is much stronger than a normal
unstiffened cylinder. The cost incurred for the ring
stiffness can be avoided by reducing the thickness of
Fig: 3.2.2 Analysis of Cylindrical Shell with Stiffener for shell mateiral and also the ring type stiffener is
Different Thickness cheaper than other types of reinforcements because
4. COMPARISION OF RESULT the manufacturing of the ring cage and its assembly is
The Fig: 4.1 shows the comparison of the critical much easier. By this method it can be concluded that
buckling pressure of ring stiffened and unstiffened the ring stiffened sturcture of the UUV can reach to
cylinders. It can be clearly seen that for the same higher depth without any repair and maintenance.
lamina thickness, a stiffened cylinder is much REFERENCES:
1. Dvorak GJ, Prochazka P, Srinivas M.V, “Design and
stronger than a normal unstiffened cylinder. Thus by fabrication of submerged cylindrical laminates”
means of ring stiffening the cost is reduced International Journal of Solids Structure, 1999;
considerably using less material. Manufacturing costs 36:3917–43.
are more or less the same but maintenance costs goes 2. Srinivas MV, Dvorak GJ, Prochazka P, “Design and
fabrication of submerged cylindrical laminates – II”
down drastically since the cylinder is stronger. Thus International Journal of Solids Structure, 1999; 36:
greater depths can be reached without having to come 3945–76.
back for any kind of repair. The ring type stiffener is 3. Zhou G, Davies GAO, “Characterization of thick glass
cheaper than other types of reinforcements since the woven roving/ polyester laminates: tension,
compression and shear” Composites, 1995; 26:579–86.
manufacturing of the ring cage is much simpler and 4. Vinson JR. “The behaviour of shells composed of
assembly is cheap. isotropic and composite materials”, Netherlands:
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
5. Samuelson LA, Eggwertz S. “Shell stability handbook”
London: Elsevier, 1992.
6. Davies P, Chauchot P. “Composites for marine
applications––part 2: underwater structures”, In:
Mechanics of composite materials and structures.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999, p. 249–
60.
7. Dvorak GJ, Prochazka P, “Thick-walled composite
cylinders with optimal fiber pre-stress”, Compos Part B
1996; 27b:643–9.
8. Gay D. Matrix composites. 4th ed. Paris: Herm_es;
1997.
Fig: 4.1 Comparison of Unstiffened and stiffened Shell 9. Kogiso N, Watson LT, Gurdal Z, Haftka RT “Genetic
Structure for Different Thickness algorithm with local improvement for composite
Fig: 4.2 and Fig: 4.3 show the FEM analysis of laminate design”, Structure Optimization 1994;7:207–
18.
cylindrical shell without and with stiffener 10. Hirano Y. “Optimization of laminated composite plate
respectively. In the Fig: 4.1 the buckling pressure at and shells”, In: Mechanics of composite materials-
the center of the cylindrical shell is maximum i.e., recent advances. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1982. p.
8.68 MPa for 6.5 mm thickness, similarly the 355–65.
11. Sun G, Hansen JS, “Optimal design of laminated
buckling pressure of stiffened cylinder is 15.79 MPa composite circular–cylindrical shells subjected to
for 6.5 mm thickness. From this result it can be combined loads”, Journal of Applied Mechanics 1988;
concluded that with ring stiffener the strength of the 55:136–42.
UUV structure can be increased to a higher extent.
Glass/epoxy showing buckling mode shape for
cylindrical shell without stiffener
Front view Top view