Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Irrizar Case Write-Up - Group 8
Irrizar Case Write-Up - Group 8
Irizar in 2005
Group 8
Sushmitha Penta
Dhwani Shah
Organization Structure
Irizar’s organization structure is not very commonly seen in a manufacturing enterprise
which usually has a lot of departments and hierarchy. Irizar does not have any kind of
departmentalization as it has no official departments, no secretaries nor walls segregating
employees except for meeting rooms which is accessible to everyone. The entire team is
divided into three groups - manufacturing group consisting of 650 individuals, reliability
group with 45 individuals and coordinating team with 9 people. Within these groups,
there are teams of 4-5 members each and a team leader is chosen by its members only.
The teams themselves define objectives for their task and lay out a plan of ideas. There
is no formal hierarchy nor a reporting mechanism between team leader and the members,
everybody has their own set of tasks and it is understood that the individual is responsible
for his/her set of tasks.
It is the trust in people that requires no control and monitoring in this kind of structure
- trust that each member would work for 8 hours a day and hence there is no clock-
in/out time stamp
- trust that each member works responsibly towards fulfilling their objectives; trust
that every member is committed to customer satisfaction
- trust that incentives are not required to encourage members to achieve/exceed
objectives
1
No formalization: Irizar clearly follows low formalization given that the jobs/roles are
not standardized (no words such as boss, employee, manager, director are used) and all
the individuals are considered owner-operators and team members, except a few taking
a title of coordinators or leaders. There are also no formal processes defined in the
organization and this enables them to be autonomous.
Reward system: Irizar did not have any individual evaluation process, which is very
commonly found. They believe that it’s humiliating and counterproductive to improving
the overall system of the organization. Given that the teams set objectives themselves,
they are allowed to evaluate themselves. This again establishes the fact that trust in an
individual can lead to performance and not necessarily control or monitoring. And the
individuals here are allowed to earn beyond their wages in terms of equally shared profits,
which means the common goal of organization success is contributing to individual
earnings.
Hiring & Training: Irizar looks for people that fit into the work environment by being
adaptable, trainable, and focused on the customer. They do not have any specific
selection process designed to hire a member, instead they go with their intuition if the
person is extroverted, energetic and valuable to Irizar. The training methodology involves
an existing member becoming a tutor rather than having a separate training team. These
actions are in coherent with their philosophy of learning through teamwork and being
autonomous.
Continuous Innovation
Irizar believed that everyone in the organization must contribute to innovation and not a
specific R&D team unlike other manufacturing companies. R&D department was removed
as their understanding of the client was much less and their speed was never in line with
outside environment. Instead, Irizar had an objective that each person should contribute
two suggestions for improvement or innovation per year. This encourages people
participation and reinforces people’s motivation.
The people working in the teams have more generalized skills, are less specialist and
enjoy wide autonomy and development possibilities in their work. The idea of open
communication in the organization encourages shared learning which is very essential in
self-management teams. The work teams have been one of the main tools through which
2
the company has achieved continuous, intensive cooperation between different
professionals, with very different knowledge, that characterizes the process of
technological innovation.