You are on page 1of 6

Nama : Priscilia Claudia Ondang

Nim : 515 18 011 493

ONEWAY
Nilai BY Kelas
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES HOMOGENEITY
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC = TUKEY BONFERRONI ALPHA(.05).
Oneway
[DataSet0]
Warnings

Post hoc tests are not performed for Nilai because there are fewer than three groups.

Descriptives

Nilai
95% Confidence Interval for
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Upper Upper Lower Upper
Bound Bound Lower Bound Bound Lower Bound Upper Bound Bound Bound
3 3 75.00 6.245 3.606 59.49 90.51 70 82
9 6 72.83 5.565 2.272 66.99 78.67 65 79
Total 9 73.56 5.503 1.834 69.33 77.79 65 82

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Nilai
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.008 1 7 .929

ANOVA

Nilai
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 9.389 1 9.389 .282 .612
Within Groups 232.833 7 33.262
Total 242.222 8
NEW FILE.
DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
NEW FILE.
DATASET NAME DataSet2 WINDOW=FRONT.
NEW FILE.
DATASET NAME DataSet3 WINDOW=FRONT.
UNIANOVA
Konsentrasi BY E.coli S.aureus
/METHOD = SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT = INCLUDE
/POSTHOC = E.coli ( TUKEY )
/PLOT = PROFILE( E.coli*S.aureus )
/EMMEANS = TABLES(E.coli*S.aureus)
/PRINT = DESCRIPTIVE ETASQ HOMOGENEITY
/PLOT = SPREADLEVEL
/CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN = E.coli S.aureus E.coli*S.aureus .

Univariate Analysis of Variance


[DataSet3]
Warnings

Post hoc tests are not performed for E.coli because error term has zero degrees of
freedom.
All spread-versus-level plots are not produced because there are less than two valid
cases in all factor level combinations.

Between-Subjects Factors

N
E.coli 9.45 1
9.53 1
9.91 1
10.34 1
10.73 1
10.79 1
11.56 1
11.74 1
11.90 1
S.aureus 10.24 1
10.31 1
10.44 1
11.30 1
11.48 1
11.53 1
11.54 1
12.60 1
12.69 1
Descriptive Statistics

Dependent Variable: Konsentrasi


E.coli S.aureus Mean Std. Deviation N
9.45 10.31 10.00 . 1
Total 10.00 . 1
9.53 10.24 10.00 . 1
Total 10.00 . 1
9.91 10.44 10.00 . 1
Total 10.00 . 1
10.34 11.30 20.00 . 1
Total 20.00 . 1
10.73 11.54 20.00 . 1
Total 20.00 . 1
10.79 11.48 20.00 . 1
Total 20.00 . 1
11.56 11.53 30.00 . 1
Total 30.00 . 1
11.74 12.60 30.00 . 1
Total 30.00 . 1
11.90 12.69 30.00 . 1
Total 30.00 . 1
Total 10.24 10.00 . 1
10.31 10.00 . 1
10.44 10.00 . 1
11.30 20.00 . 1
11.48 20.00 . 1
11.53 30.00 . 1
11.54 20.00 . 1
12.60 30.00 . 1
12.69 30.00 . 1
Total 20.00 8.660 9

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variances(a)

Dependent Variable: Konsentrasi


F df1 df2 Sig.
. 8 0 .
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a Design: Intercept+E.coli+S.aureus+E.coli * S.aureus
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Konsentrasi


Type III Sum Partial Eta
Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared
Corrected Model 600.000(a) 8 75.000 . . 1.000
Intercept 3600.000 1 3600.000 . . 1.000
E.coli .000 0 . . . .
S.aureus .000 0 . . . .
E.coli * S.aureus .000 0 . . . .
Error .000 0 .
Total 4200.000 9
Corrected Total 600.000 8
a R Squared = 1.000 (Adjusted R Squared = .)

Estimated Marginal Means


E.coli * S.aureus

Dependent Variable: Konsentrasi


E.coli S.aureus Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Bound Bound Lower Bound Upper Bound
9.45 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 10.000 . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
9.53 10.24 10.000 . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
9.91 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 10.000 . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
10.34 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 20.000 . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
10.73 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 20.000 . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
10.79 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 20.000 . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
11.56 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 30.000 . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
11.74 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 30.000 . . .
12.69 .(a) . . .
11.90 10.24 .(a) . . .
10.31 .(a) . . .
10.44 .(a) . . .
11.30 .(a) . . .
11.48 .(a) . . .
11.53 .(a) . . .
11.54 .(a) . . .
12.60 .(a) . . .
12.69 30.000 . . .
a This level combination of factors is not observed, thus the corresponding population marginal mean is not
estimable.

Profile Plots

Estimated Marginal Means of Konsentrasi

30 S.aureus
10.24
10.31
10.44
Estimated Marginal Means

11.30
25 11.48
11.53
11.54
12.60
12.69
20

15

10

9.45 9.53 9.91 10.34 10.73 10.79 11.56 11.74 11.90


E.coli

Non-estimable means are not plotted

You might also like