The study will be undertaken to find out different techniques to create an efficient space

for people and habitat for different species present in LLPPCHEA. In this study the people can
understand what can Mangroves contribute for providing ecosystem and maintaining the good
water quality in the Philippines.

The study aims to help following set of people and organizations:

Community

This study would be beneficial to the locals because it will enhance the relationship
between nature and society through the facility which will introduce the advantageous effects
of nature to evade from hazardous elements.

Foreign Tourists

The study would also be beneficial to the foreign tourists because they will be aware
how to properly maintain the place without any disturbance. They can easily integrate with
what the Coastal lagoon critical habitat can do to build a responsive environment.

Academe

Significance Students
of the Study The students can use this research as reference for their future studies.

Professors
The research will be useful for the professors, and they can use them as a basis
or teaching paraphernalia.

Researcher and Urban Planners

The research proposal can serve as a basis for planners who will have a future
project around the vicinity.

Society

Local Government of Las Piñas and Parañaque

The study will contribute to the local government by providing them a boost in
tourism and letting the place known for both locals and foreigners.

Future generations

The study will benefit the young ones in order for them to become the stewards of the
environment. Especially by making them aware of the consequences of the harm we are doing
to the only earth we live in.

4 of 11
 Future researchers

This study would be beneficial to the future researchers where they can use this to offer
additional data for interrelated research and answer the questions through this study.

Philippines
The Country will benefit to this study by providing additional ideas that might help in
creating a stigma that will make every Filipinos be proud of what we have and be aware that
we must at all cost protect our environment and the species that we had.

Grading Parameters (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor) 1 2 3 4 5

(Very Poor) (Poor) (Fair) (Good) (Excellent)

Justification on the why the problem being investigated is important, and

what significance the result will have
Includes a statement on the relevance to felt needs, the potential
contribution of the research to new knowledge and policy implications
Notes (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor):

Research
Framework

5 of 11
 Short Based on the conceptual framework above, it is clearly shown that there are factors
discussion of affecting the conservation of livable and responsive environment for society and animals such
the Research
Framework
as the physical aspect of the place, social and economic development not only the city but also
the Philippines, innovative technologies, and education for awareness of the people. It focuses
on how LLPCHEA be conserved and significant in our country through subdividing the three
factors said above. First is the physical aspect which branched out to five elements such as
aesthetics, permeability, thermal effect, and urban elements which directly affect the user’s
perception. Second, social and economic value affects the cultural and Economic status. Third,
technology which could be accomplished through innovative facilities.

Grading Parameters (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor) 1 2 3 4 5

(Very Poor) (Poor) (Fair) (Good) (Excellent)

Illustration captures the connection and relationship of the concepts/

issues being discussed
Concise discussion tallies well with the illustration

Notes (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor):

Biodiversity User Perception

Bryant, (2010)
Conservation
Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. Vodouhê et al., (2010)
(2007) Political Ecology Impact Hillery, Nancarrow, Griffin, & Syme,
Wilson et al., (2007) (2001)
Hostetler, Allen, & Meurk, Harada,(2003)
(2011) Process and Characteristics Fiallo, & Jacobson, (1995)
Review Vézquez, D. P., & Gittleman, Strategies and Attitude Junge et al., (2009)
of J. L. (1998) Silori,. (2007)
Related Poiani et al., (2000)
Literature Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A.
Management Human-nature De Groot, Drenthen, & De Groot,
(2011)
J., & Benton, T. G. (2010) relationship
Shwartz et al., (2012)
Fontana, Sattler, Bontadina, Schultz,. (2002)
& Moretti, (2011)
Indicators of Nature
Duelli, & Obrist, (2003)
Conservation Lindenmayer, Franklin, & Fischer, (2006)

RRL of Wilson et al., (2007). Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to do, where, and when. Retrieved from
at least http://Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When
one
literature
In this research written by nineteen authors, discuss the benefits of urbanization to a country as
to be being globally competitive. However, it negatively affects the structure and function of the environment.
used in For that reason, the abundance of green spaces is needed in order to efficiently develop Biodversity
the conservation. It showed instances where urban green space is present which is provision of private
Research gardens as major component in environmental benefits. Also, they construct a framework showing

6 of 11
 conservation investment and illustrate its application using Mediterranean-type habitats. It helped to
acquire solutions and basis on threat-specific conservation which has the ability to formulate the greatest
potential biodiversity benefit.

The researchers’ aims are timely and relevant to the the current issue Manila is facing. It was
clearly stated that in order to maximize the Biodiversity conservation investment of different actions will
be done through identifying the threats, opportunities, and solutions to achieve an efficient and effective
environment. The researchers used Spearman coefficient of rank correlation to summarize priority
rankings based on the ecoaction-specific framework to those based on a ranking of vertebrate species
richness. I tis a nonparametric measure of rank correlation between two variables.

This can be relevant to the researcher’s study because it serves as a guide for the development of
Mangrove Observatory Center in LPPCHEA where it presented paradigmatic methods and design
approach to make a facility for providing a livable and responsive environment. Also, the methods used
are significant for identifying Biodiversity benefits which is the number of plant and vertebrate species
predicted to persist in an ecoregion after investment in the ecoaction.

Grading Parameters (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor) 1 2 3 4 5

(Very Poor) (Poor) (Fair) (Good) (Excellent)

The structure of the RRL captures the overview, concepts and

explanations, and concluding discussion on the relevance of the
literature to the research
Concise discussion tallies well with the illustration

Notes (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor):

7 of 11
 Desk Research Ocular Inspection Primary research

-Photo -Online surveys

-Online finding
documentation
-Interviews
-Restrictions
-Actual measurements
-Questionnaires
Methodology -Site inventory

-Guidelines
-Laws Site analysis -Expert opinion
-Standards -Public perception

Design principles
development and
assessment

Short This chapter discusses how the researcher will gather the necessary data that will be used in the
discussion of entire study. It describes who will bet he respondents and focus of the research. This also shows the
the
Methodology
procedures of data collection and instruments used; these chapter will also discuss the type of
research, research method, and the research locale where the study will be collected.

Research Method

The study entitled “Development of Mangrove Conservatory Center at LPPCHEA” is a

qualitative research that attempts to accumulate existing information and data regarding the factors
affecting the relationship of Biodiversity conservation and user perception in LPPCHEA through
online research, primary research, and ocular inspection. In a study conducted by Wilson et al.,
(2007), qualitative reserach is used to compare the results of our analyses to planning approaches,
elative levels of investment in Phytophthora management , and predator control. In another research
by Shwartz et al., (2012), qualitative method is also used to investigate the influence of this short
urban nature experience on the relationships that city-dwellers develop with nearby biodiversity.

The research would make use of descriptive, exploratory, and historical methods in the duration
of the study. Descriptive research is used to describe the factors of Biodiversity conservation in

8 of 11
 LPPCHEA and characteristics of the users being studied. Historical research is employed to
determine the in-depth solutions based on the past events occured in the place. The researcher would
make use of the society’s perception towards the Mangrove observatory center in LPPCHEA in
helping to maintain the human-nature relationship in order to come up with description and collect
data to answer the research problem.

Sampling Design

This study used Quota Sampling in determining the samples of the study by dividing the
population into sub-groups. The residents, other local and foreign tourists are the respondents.

Subjects of the study

In this study, thirty (30) residents, thirty (30) locals tourists, and fifteen (15) foreign tourists
will be selected to participate in the process.

Research Instrument

Interview, online survey, and questionnaire were used to collect data with each
respondent. It consists of questions answering the significance of human-nature relationship and
Biodiversity conservation.

Research Locale

The study was conducted in Parañaque, City since the chosen respondents are residents, other
local and foreign tourists.

Data Gathering Procedure

A concise survey, interview, and questionnaire will be given to the respondents. In this
approach, questions about the develpment of Mangrove observatory center at LPPCHEA will be
asked and the respondents’ perception about the questions will be evaluated.

Grading Parameters (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor) 1 2 3 4 5

(Very Poor) (Poor) (Fair) (Good) (Excellent)

Illustration captures the connection and relationship of the concepts/

issues being discussed
Concise discussion tallies well with the illustration

Notes (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor):

9 of 11
 Bryant, R. L. (2000). Politicized moral geographies: debating biodiversity conservation and
ancestral domain in the Philippines. Political geography, 19(6), 673-705.

Wilson, K. A., Underwood, E. C., Morrison, S. A., Klausmeyer, K. R., Murdoch, W. W.,
Reyers, B., ... & Pressey, R. L. (2007). Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where,
and when. PLOS biology, 5(9), e223.

Duelli, P., & Obrist, M. K. (2003). Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures.
Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 98(1-3), 87-98.

Vézquez, D. P., & Gittleman, J. L. (1998). Biodiversity conservation: does phylogeny matter?.
Current Biology, 8(11), R379-R381.

Poiani, K. A., Richter, B. D., Anderson, M. G., & Richter, H. E. (2000). Biodiversity
conservation at multiple scales: functional sites, landscapes, and networks. BioScience, 50(2),
133-146.

Lindenmayer, D. B., Franklin, J. F., & Fischer, J. (2006). General management principles and
a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biological conservation,
131(3), 433-445.

Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J., & Benton, T. G. (2010). Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity
conservation in urban environments. Trends in ecology & evolution, 25(2), 90-98.

Fontana, S., Sattler, T., Bontadina, F., & Moretti, M. (2011). How to manage the urban green
References to improve bird diversity and community structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(3),
278-285.

Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: political ecology and
biodiversity conservation. Conservation and society, 5(2), 147.

Vodouhê, F. G., Coulibaly, O., Adégbidi, A., & Sinsin, B. (2010). Community perception of
biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. Forest Policy and Economics,
12(7), 505-512.

Hillery, M., Nancarrow, B., Griffin, G., & Syme, G. (2001). Tourist perception of
environmental impact. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(4), 853-867.

Harada, K. (2003). Attitudes of local people towards conservation and Gunung Halimun
national park in west Java, Indonesia. Journal of Forest Research, 8(4), 271-282.

Fiallo, E. A., & Jacobson, S. K. (1995). Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of
rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental
Conservation, 22(3), 241-249.

Junge, X., Jacot, K. A., Bosshard, A., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2009). Swiss people's
attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature
Conservation, 17(3), 150-159.

Silori, C. S. (2007). Perception of local people towards conservation of forest resources in

Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, north-western Himalaya, India. Biodiversity and
Conservation, 16(1), 211-222.
10 of 11
 Shwartz, A., Cosquer, A., Jaillon, A., Piron, A., Julliard, R., Raymond, R., ... & Prévot-
Julliard, A. C. (2012). Urban biodiversity, city-dwellers and conservation: How does an
outdoor activity day affect the human-nature relationship?. PLoS One, 7(6), e38642.

Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In

Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61-78). Springer, Boston, MA.

Grading Parameters (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor) 1 2 3 4 5

(Very Poor) (Poor) (Fair) (Good) (Excellent)

Reference list follows the APA style format

Reference list contains 80% books or journals and 20% other sources
Reference list is correctly cited in the background of the study and other
parts of the capsule proposal
Notes (To be filled up by the Evaluator/ Instructor):

11 of 11