Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract—The crystalline silicon heterojunction structure efficiency. In addition, HIT has exhibited a low-temperature
adopted in photovoltaic modules commercialized as Panasonic’s coefficient and can produce more electricity than conventional
HIT has significantly reduced recombination loss, resulting in crystalline silicon solar panels at the same temperature as the
greater conversion efficiency. The structure of an interdigitated
back contact was adopted with our crystalline silicon heterojunc- temperatures rise. The heterojunction structure of the solar cell
tion solar cells to reduce optical loss from a front grid electrode, features intrinsic (i-type) and doped a-Si:H layers on a randomly
a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) layer, and a-Si:H layers as textured c-Si wafer [1]. The i- and p-type a-Si:H layers are de-
an approach for exceeding the conversion efficiency of 25%. As posited on one surface to obtain a p/n heterojunction, and the
a result of the improved short-circuit current (Jsc ), we achieved i- and n-type a-Si:H layers are formed on the opposite surface
the world’s highest efficiency of 25.6% for crystalline silicon-based
solar cells under 1-sun illumination (designated area: 143.7 cm2 ). to obtain a back surface field structure. Transparent conductive
oxide (TCO) layers and metal grid electrodes are formed on
Index Terms—Amorphous materials, photovoltaic cells, silicon the doped layers. The surface dangling bonds of c-Si wafers
heterojunction, surface passivation.
are well passivated by inserting high-quality i-type a-Si:H lay-
ers between the c-Si wafer and the doped a-Si:H layers. Any
I. INTRODUCTION thermal damage to the cell’s components is also avoided as a
result of low-temperature processes. A high open-circuit volt-
INCE solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, which utilize the
S sun, the most abundant renewable energy source, are in-
creasingly being used in many countries, the PV market has
age (Vo c ) over 0.700 V can be attained. Recently, many groups
have focused on the excellent surface passivating properties and
have reported on crystalline silicon heterojunction cells [2]–[4].
been growing every year. 38 GW of PV modules were installed In our cells, four main features have been optimized: the aspect
in 2013, and the total installed capacity reached 137 GW world- ratio and the resistivity of the grid electrodes, the absorption
wide. Such rapid market growth has also driven the price reduc- and the conductivity of the TCO layers, the absorption and the
tion of PV modules. passivation of the a-Si:H layers, and the surface structure and
As the price of PV modules has fallen, reducing the balance the damage to the c-Si wafers. We achieved 23.7% efficiency
of system (BOS) cost for inverters, mounting materials, instal- in 2011 and 24.7% efficiency in 2013 using 98-μm-thick Si
lation, labor, and shipping has become more important. Highly thin wafers of a practical size (100 cm2 and above) [5], [6] and
efficient solar panels can reduce the BOS cost more than inef- attained an excellent Vo c of 0.750 V and a low surface recom-
ficient solar panels because they require fewer panels, less roof bination velocity of 1.5 cm/s [7]. However, loss analysis of
space, fewer mounting materials, and shorter installation times. the solar cell with 24.7% efficiency estimated that the optical
The silicon heterojunction structure adopted in Panasonic’s loss was 60–70% of the total loss [8]. An interdigitated back
HIT1 has significantly reduced recombination loss for greater contact structure [9] was adopted with our crystalline silicon
heterojunction solar cells to further reduce optical loss. Sun-
light is collected from the total surface area because the front
Manuscript received June 25, 2014; revised August 5, 2014; accepted August grid electrode is eliminated. Reduced absorption losses from
12, 2014. the a-Si:H and TCO layers on the front surface are also ex-
The authors are with Solar Business Unit, Eco Solutions Company, Panasonic pected. SunPower has successfully industrialized point contact
Corporation, Kaizuka City, Osaka 597-0094, Japan (e-mail: masuko.keiichiro@
jp.panasonic.com; shigematsu.masato@jp.panasonic.com; hashiguchi.taiki@ solar cells with an interdigitated back contact structure [10]
jp.panasonic.com; fujishima.daisuke006@jp.panasonic.com; kai.motohide@ as a high-efficiency silicon solar cell. In 2014, they updated
jp.panasonic.com; yoshimura.naoki3@jp.panasonic.com; yamaguchi.ttm@jp. its efficiency to 25.0% [11]. The combination of crystalline
panasonic.com; ichihashi.yoshinari@jp.panasonic.com; mishima.takahiro@jp.
panasonic.com; matsubara.naoteru@jp.panasonic.com; yamanishi.tsutomu@ silicon heterojunction solar cells with an interdigitated back
jp.panasonic.com; takahama.tsuyoshi@jp.panasonic.com; taguchi.mikio@jp. contact structure has been studied by several groups [12]–[15].
panasonic.com; maruyama.eiji@jp.panasonic.com; okamoto.shingo1@jp. In this paper, we describe the effectiveness of placing a front
panasonic.com).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2352151 grid electrode on the back of a crystalline silicon heterojunction
1 HIT is a registered trademark of the Panasonic group.
solar cell.
2156-3381 © 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
TABLE I
PROGRESS IN CELL PARAMETERS
Fig. 3. EQE spectra of solar cells with efficiency of 24.7% (dashed line) and
25.6% (solid line).
Fig. 2. I–V characteristics of 25.6% efficiency solar cell at research level
(certified by AIST).
MASUKO et al.: ACHIEVEMENT OF MORE THAN 25% CONVERSION EFFICIENCY WITH CRYSTALLINE SILICON HETEROJUNCTION 3
24.7% cell, considering the increase in the wafer thickness from REFERENCES
98 to 150 μm. [1] M. Taguchi, M. Tanaka, T. Matsuyama, T. Matsuoka, S. Tsuda, S. Nakano,
Y. Kishi, and Y. Kuwano, “Improvement of conversion efficiency of poly-
B. Vo c crystalline silicon thin film solar cell,” in Proc. Tech. Dig. Int. Photovoltaic
Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib., 1990, pp. 689–692.
We optimized the conditions for growing the a-Si:H layers [2] S. De Wolf, A. Descoeudres, Z. C. Holman, and C. Ballif, “High-efficiency
silicon heterojunction solar cells: A Review,” Green, vol. 2, pp. 7–24,
and cleaning the c-Si wafer’s surface to reduce damage to the
2012.
heterointerface. We obtained a high Vo c of 0.740 V, which was [3] M. Bivour, C. Reichel, M. Hermle, and S. W. Glunz, “Improving the
close to the Vo c of 0.744 V for the 151-μm-thick crystalline sil- a-Si:H (p) rear emitter contact of n-type silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy
icon heterojunction solar cell reported in 2013 [6] and superior Mater. Solar Cells, vol. 106, pp. 11–16, 2012.
[4] M. Bivour, S. Schröer, M. Hermle, and S. W. Glunz, “Silicon hetero-
to the Vo c of other back contact solar cells fabricated through junction rear emitter solar cells: Less restrictions on the optoelectrical
thermal diffusion processes. These results suggest that the struc- properties of front side TCOs,” Sol. Energy Mater. Solar Cells, vol. 122,
ture of the crystalline silicon heterojunction cell with back con- pp. 120–129, 2014.
[5] T. Kinoshita, D. Fujishima, A. Yano, A. Ogane, S. Tohoda, K. Matsuyama,
tact reduced the recombination loss of the charge carriers as Y. Nakamura, N. Tokuoka, H. Kanno, H. Sakata, M. Taguchi, and
well as the standard structure with a grid electrode on the front E. Maruyama, “The approaches for high efficiency HIT R
solar cell with
surface. very thin (<100 μm) silicon wafer over 23%,” in Proc. 26th Eur. PV Sol.
Energy Conf., 2011, pp. 871–874.
[6] M. Taguchi, A. Yano, S. Tohoda, K. Matsuyama, Y. Nakamura,
C. F.F. T. Nishiwaki, K. Fujita, and E. Maruyama, “24.7% record efficiency HIT
solar cell on thin silicon wafer,” in Proc. 39th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec.
F.F. is generally affected by both resistive and recombination Conf., 2013, pp. 96–99.
losses at the operating point. Surface recombination contributes [7] S. Tohoda, A. Yano, K. Matsuyama, Y. Nakamura, T. Nishiwaki, K. Fujita,
M. Taguchi, and E. Maruyama, “24.7% notably high efficiency HIT solar
to recombination loss at the operating point, and Vo c is mainly af- cell,” in Proc. 23rd Photovoltaic Sci. Eng. Conf., 2013, pp. 1405–1408.
fected by the Auger recombination. There is a tradeoff between [8] A. Yano, S. Tohoda, K. Matsuyama, Y. Nakamura, T. Nishiwaki, K. Fujita,
surface recombination and resistive losses in the thickness of M. Taguchi, and E. Maruyama, “24.7% record efficiency HIT solar cell
on thin silicon wafer,” in Proc. 28th Eur. Photovoltaic Sol. Energy Conf.,
a-Si layers for crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells [17]. 2013, pp. 748–751.
We scrutinized the growth conditions to attain high passiva- [9] M. D. Lammert and R. J. Schwartz, “The interdigitated back contact solar
tion using thin a-Si:H layers and successfully obtained a-Si:H cell: A silicon solar cell for concentrated sun-light,” IEEE Trans. Electron
Devices, vol. ED-24, no. 4, pp. 337–342, Apr. 1977.
layers with low resistivity and high passivation. The thickness, [10] R. M. Swanson, “Point contact solar cells: Theory and modeling,” in Proc.
linewidth, and electrical resistivity of the grid electrodes were 18th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., 1985, pp. 604–610.
optimized as another approach for reducing resistive loss. Com- [11] D. D. Smith, P. Cousins, S. Westerberg, R. De Jesus-Tabajonda, G. Aniero,
and Yu-Chen Shen, “Towards the practical limits of silicon solar cells,” in
pared with our 24.7% cell, the resistive loss was decreased by Proc. 40th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., 2014, p. 129.
25%, although the surface recombination loss increased. As a [12] M. Lu, S. Bowden, U. Das, and R. Birkmire, “Interdigitated back con-
result, we achieved an F.F. of 0.827 using a solar cell area over tact silicon heterojunction solar cell and the effect of front surface pas-
sivation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 91, pp. 063507-1–063507-3, 2007 doi:
100 cm2 . This is comparable with the high F.F. of 0.830 for the 10.1063/1.2768635.
25.0% SunPower solar cell [11]. [13] A. Tomasi, B. Paviet-Salomon, D. Lachenal, S. M. de Nicolas, A. Descoeu-
dres, J. Geissbühler, S. De Wolf, and C. Ballif, “Back-contacted silicon
heterojunction solar cells with efficiency >21%,” IEEE J. Photovoltaics,
vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1046–1054, Jul. 2014.
IV. CONCLUSION [14] S.-Y. Lee, H. Choi, H. Li, K. Ji, S. Nam, J. Choi, S.-W. Ahn, H.-M. Lee,
and B. Park, “Analysis of a-Si:H/TCO contact resistance for the Si
We have developed a crystalline silicon heterojunction so- heterojunction back-contact solar cell,” Sol. Energy Mater. Solar Cells,
lar cell with an interdigitated back contact to reduce optical vol. 120, pp. 412–416, 2014.
loss. The Jsc improved to 41.8 mA/cm2 . As a result, a new [15] N. Mingirulli, J. Haschke, R. Gogolin, R. Ferre, T. F. Schulze,
J. Dusterhoft, N. P. Harder, L. Korte, R. Brendel, and B. Rech, “Ef-
record efficiency of 25.6% was achieved for nonconcentrat- ficient interdigitated back-contacted silicon heterojunction solar cells,”
ing silicon-based solar cells under 1-sun illumination (desig- Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett., vol. 5, pp. 159–161, 2011.
nated area: 143.7 cm2 ). The solar efficiency exceeded 26% with [16] M. A. Green, K. Emery, Y. Hishikawa, W. Warta, and E. D. Dunlop “Solar
cell efficiency tables (version 43),” Prog. Photovoltaic Res. Appl., vol. 22,
our best cell parameters: Vo c : 0.750 V, Jsc : 41.8 mA/cm2 , and pp. 1–9, 2014.
F.F.: 83.2%. Note that crystalline silicon heterojunction solar [17] H. Fujiwara and M. Kondo, “Effects of a-Si:H layer thicknesses on the
cells have the potential for improving conversion efficiency to performance of a-Si:H/c-Si heterojunction solar cells,” J. Appl. Phys.,
vol. 101, p. 054516, 2007.
over 26%. We will continue to develop technology to achieve
26% efficiency. Authors’ photographs and biographies not available at the time of publication.