You are on page 1of 6

Formulating the research design

1. Introduction
 This chapter uncovers three layers: research strategies, research choices and time horizons.
These three layer can be thought of as focusing on the process of research design, that is,
turning your research question into a research project.
 Research design will be the general plan of how you will go about answering your research
questions.
 It contains clear objectives, derived from research questions, specifies the sources from
which you intend to collect data, and considers the constraints (access to data, time,
location and money) as well as discussing ethical issues.
 Design and tactics are distinct. Design is concerned with the overall plan for research.
Tactics is about the finer detail of data collection and analysis, the center of the research
onion.
 Tactics will involve the clear about the different quantitative and qualitative data collection
techniques and subsequent quantitive and qualitative data analysis procedures.
 In this chapter:
 The purpose of research (5.2)
 Research strategies (5.3)
 Multiple research choices (5.4)
 Time horizon (5.5)
 Research credibility (5.6)

2. The purpose of your research


Classification of research purpose: threefold one of exploratory, descriptive and explanatory.
 The purpose may change over time.
Exploratory Studies
 to seek new insights, to ask questions and to assess phenomena;
 used when you want to clarify your understanding of a problem;
 3 principal ways of conducting: a search of the literature, interviewing ‘experts’, and
focus group interview.
 Advantage: flexible and adaptable to change as a result of new data.
Descriptive Studies
 to portray an accurate profile of persons, events or situations.
 should have a clear picture of the phenomena on which you wish to collect data.
 skills developed: evaluating and synthesising ideas.
Explanatory Studies
 to establish causal relationships between variables
 to study a situation/ problem to explain the relationships between variables.

3. The need for a clear research strategy


Experiment
 Purpose: to study causal links between variables; or consider the size of the change and
the relative importance of variables.
 Used in exploratory and explanatory research => answer “how” and “why” questions
 How to conduct:
 definition of a theoretical hypothesis;
 selections of samples of individuals from known populations;
 random allocation of sample to the experimental and control group;
 introduction of planned intervention or manipulation to one or more of the
variables;
 control of all other variables.
 Often used on captive populations: university students, employees of a particular
organisation and the like.
Survey
 Purpose: to answer who, what, where, how much and how many questions.
 Used for exploratory and descriptive research.
 How to conduct:
 using a questionaire administered to a sample => easy comparison.
 analysing data quantitatively using descriptive and inferential statistics.
 Advantages:
 Data can be used to suggest possible reasons for relations between variables.
 More control over research process
 Findings generated are representative of the whole population at a low cost.
Case study
 To do research involving an investigation of a particular contemporary phenomenon
within its real life context;
 Used for explanatory and exploratory research.
 To gain a rich understanding of the context of the research and the processes;
 To answer why, what, how questions;
 Data may be collected through interviews, observation, documentary analysis, etc.,
 4 case study strategies:
 Single case: represents a critical/ extreme/ unique case. => defining the actual
case
 Multiple cases: focuses on the need to establish whether the outcomes of the
first casr occur in other cases and the need to generalise the findings.
 Holistic case: research is concerned with the organisation as a whole.
 Embedded case: research is concerned with a number of logical sub-units within
the organization.
Action research
4 common themes
 Focusing upon and emphasises the purpose of the research
 Relating to the involvement of practitioners in the research
 Emphasising the iterative nature of the process of diagnosing, planning, taking action
and evaluating
 Implicating beyond the immediate project
2 distinct foci
 Fulfilling the agenda of those undertaking the research rather than that of the sponsor
 Focusing on the needs of the sponsor and involving those undertaking the research in
the sponsor’s issues
Grounded theory
 Grounded theory is helpful for research to predict and explain behaviour
 In grounded theory, theory is developed from data generated by observations
 6 commons misconceptions about grounded theory
- Grounded theory is not an excuse to ignore the literature, or defer reading
existing theory until the data are collected and analysed
- Grounded theory is not presentation of raw data
- Grounded theory is not theory testing, content analysist, or word counts
- Grounded theory is not simply routine application of formulaic procedures to
data
- Grounded theory requires researchers to develop a tatic knowledge of their data
- Grounded theory is the product of considerable experience, hard work,
creativity, and occasionally, a healthy of good luck
Ethnography
 Purpose: To describe and explain the social world the research subject inhabit
 Used for researching the phenomenon
 To gaining insight about particular context and better understanding and interpret it
from the perspective(s) of those involved
 How to conduct:
- Find a setting group or group to answer research question; meet and negotiate full
access with research objectives
- Develop strategies to cope with being both a full time member in the social context
 Disadvantages:
- Changeable time and time consuming
- Need flexible and responsive research process
- Having contradictory meaning in the term naturalism
Archival research
 Make use of administrative records and documents as the principal source of data
 Used for explanatory and exploratory or descriptive research
 Collect data with different purpose and the administrations of organizations =>Archival
research is conflated with secondary data analysis
 Focus on changeable answers in changeable time
 How to conduct: establish available data and design research
4. Multiple method choices – combing data collection techniques and analysis
procedures
 Difference between data collection techniques (quantitative and qualitative) and data
analysis procedures: focus on numeric (number) and non-numeric (words)
- Quantitative (questionnaires) or data analysis procedure(graphs or statistics)
- Qualitative (interview) or data analysis procedure (categorizing)
 Combining quantitative and qualitative and data analysis is research choice
- Individual methods don’t not exist isolation
- Can mix single data collection method and single data analysis procedure or multiple
data collection methods and data analysis procedure
 Questionnaires + structured observation analyzing + statistical procedure
 multiple method quantitative study
 In-depth interview + dairy accounts + non –numerical procedure
 multiple method qualitative study
 2 mixed method approaches
- Using quantitative and qualitative collection techniques and data analysis procedures at
the same time (parallel)
- One after the other

5. The credibility of research findings


Two particular emphases on research design: reliability and validity.
5.1. Reliability:
 Can be assessed through three questions
- Will the measures yield the same results on other occassions?
- Will similar observations be reached by other observers?
- Is there transparency in how sense was made from the raw data?
 4 threats to reliability
- Subject or participant error
- Subject or participant bias
- Observer error
- Observer bias
5.2. Validity
 Is concerned with whether the findings are really about whatthey appear to be about.
 Threats to validity
- History
- Testing
- Instrumentation
- Mortality
- Maturation
- Ambiguity about causal irection
 Generalisation (sometimes referred as external calidity) = whether your findings may be
equally applicable to other research settings  try to explain what is going on in your
particular research setting
 Logic leaps and false assumptions: Your research design will be based on a flow of logic
and a number of assumptions, all of which must stand up to the closest scrunity
 Identification of the research population: Similar to generalisation
 Data collection
 Data interpretation: It is important to choose an appropriate theoretical framework
which will shape your conclusions
 Development of conclusions

You might also like