Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Abstract
The influence of MgAl2 O4 spinel addition as a ceramic bonding in the MgO–CaZrO3 refractory was established by the evaluation of physical and
microstructural characteristics in terms of density, porosity, crystalline phases, phase distribution and morphology. X-ray diffraction analyses and
scanning electron microscopy with microanalysis have been used. The mechanical behavior has been evaluated in terms of cold crushing strength
at room temperature and modulus of rupture at 25 and 1260 ◦ C. Static and dynamic resistances tested by chemical attack of clinker raw constituents
have been carried out at 1450 ◦ C. Results showed that thermo-mechanical properties significantly improved with increasing the content of spinel.
Microstructural analysis revealed that spinel phase aided to develop a strong bond between MgO and CaZrO3 refractory aggregates. Finally, the
refractory bodies exhibited a good thermal stability and an excellent chemical resistance against the clinker raw material.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0955-2219/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.04.027
2768 E.A. Rodríguez et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 33 (2013) 2767–2774
et al. demonstrated through corrosion studies, the use of cement purity magnesia (MgO at industrial grade purity), laboratory
clinker with MgO–CaZrO3 based fine grained materials for these synthesized calcium zirconate (CaZrO3 ), zirconia (ZrO2 ) and
purposes.17 CaZrO3 can dissolve in the liquid clinker phase and MgAl2 O4 spinel with 98 wt% purity. The chemical analysis of
increases its viscosity. This process restricts infiltration of the the raw materials obtained by X-ray fluorescence technique is
cement clinker phase into the refractory.18,19 given in Table 1. It is important to mention that all the staring
MgO and CaZrO3 have been suggested as chrome- raw materials used in this stage of the investigation have particle
free refractories for cement kilns20–24 to replace not only size smaller than 45 m. The addition of a small quantity of fine
magnesia–chromite, but also magnesia-oversaturated spinel zirconia particles in all formulations is mainly for avoiding the
refractories currently in use. MgO spinel bricks are highly resis- free lime in the refractory matrix and promoting the formation
tant to thermal shock, non-sensitive against reducing/oxidizing of an “in situ” calcium zirconate phase.
conditions, but vulnerable to thermal overload. Spinel also forms The phase analysis of raw materials at laboratory scale
low-melting phases with the result of premature wear.25–27 The was determined using a Siemens model D5000 diffractometer
analysis of MgO–CaZrO3 composite as refractory materials in equipment using, Cu K␣ radiation source (λ = 1.54056 Å) and
rotary cement kilns carried out by Kozuka et al.11,12 points out a setting of 40 kV and 30 mA. All XRD data were collected
a good behavior on service of this material but peeled off easily under the same experimental conditions; in the angular range
in high stressed areas. Recently, the behavior against corrosion 5◦ ≤ 2θ ≤ 90◦ using θ/2θ configuration with a step scan of 0.05◦
by clinker of MgO–CaZrO3 matrices at high temperatures was and 1 s per step exposure time.
established by Serena et al.28,29 Their results underline the good At the laboratory scale, the crystalline phases from the raw
corrosion behavior of the MgO–CaZrO3 materials, and support materials were identified by the X-ray diffraction as: MgO (per-
their use as a matrix in magnesia chrome-free bricks for the iclase), CaZrO3 [calcium zirconate (CaZrO3 ) and a zirconium
burning zone of rotary cement kilns. dioxide stabilized by Ca2+ ions (Ca0.15 Zr0.85 O1.85 )], MgAl2 O4
Magnesium aluminate spinel is a technologically important [periclase (MgO) and magnesium aluminate spinel (MgAl2 O4 )]
material with very attractive properties such as high melting and ZrO2 (baddeleyite).
point (2135 ◦ C), high mechanical strength at elevated tempera- In the first stage of the present work, the influence of
ture, high thermal shock resistance and low thermal expansion MgAl2 O4 spinel on MgO–CaZrO3 properties in a laboratory
coefficient. scale was evaluated through the development of four refrac-
Taking into account the previously mentioned, the aim of tory formulations. Variations carried out in the formulations are
the present study is to investigate at laboratory and industrial reported in Table 2.
scale the physical, mechanical and chemical properties as well The second stage was conducted at an industrial scale. The
as microstructural characteristics of new free-chrome brick com- use of large amounts of high purity raw material was nec-
posites of a MgO–CaZrO3 matrix doped with low contents of essary in order to obtain suitable final refractory properties.
MgAl2 O4 spinel (2.5–6 wt.%) in order to meet the lining require- The chemical composition of the raw material used for the
ments present in the rotary cement kiln.30–34 development of new refractory bricks is shown in Table 1. For
the sintered commercial magnesia a wide particle size distri-
2. Experimental procedure bution composed by coarse, intermediate and fine grains was
used. The particle size distribution of sintered commercial mag-
2.1. Raw materials and refractory formulation nesia in mm was: −4.76 + 2.83 mm (7%), −2.83 + 1.19 mm
(29%), −1.19 + 0.595 mm (22%), −0.595 + 0.250 mm (12%),
Different raw materials were used for the preparation of −0.250 mm (6%) and −0.044 mm (24%). Particularly, in the
the refractory mixtures at laboratory scale. Commercial high case of electrofused magnesia–calcium zirconate mixture, which
Table 1
Chemical composition of raw materials.
Raw materials Oxide compounds (% by weight)
Laboratory scale
Sintered MgO 97.90 – 1.64 – – 0.30
Sintered CaZrO3 – 72.80 26.57 – – – – –
MgAl2 O4 28.61 – 0.32 70.36 – 0.51 – –
ZrO2 98.0 – – – – 1.50
Clinker raw material 0.88 – 44.79 3.03 1.60 11.86 0.47 0.24
Industrial scale
Sintered MgO 98.91 – 0.85 0.08 0.05 0.11 – –
Electrofused MgO–CaZrO3 50.00 36.43 13.57 – – – – –
MgAl2 O4 34.00 – 0.20 64.0 1.0 0.40 – –
ZrO2 – 97.72 – – – 2.10 – –
Clinker raw material 0.88 – 44.79 3.03 1.60 11.86 0.47 0.24
E.A. Rodríguez et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 33 (2013) 2767–2774 2769
Table 3
Physical properties of MgO–CaZrO3 and MgO–CaZrO3 –MgAl2 O4 refractory bricks.
Formulation Physical properties
amount of 3–5 kg) was fed continually during 4 h rotating the bricks produced at the different conditions was suitable for
kiln at 1 r.p.m. After the test, the degree of infiltration and the the purposes of the investigation, since it could be helping to
microstructure damage of the refractory were evaluated by elec- develop a good adherence of the coating.
tronic microscopy on polished sections. The maximum crushing strength value in the refractory bricks
was found for the MAS2 specimen, which showed minimum
3. Results and discussion porosity value. There is maximum increment in resistance of
approximately 42.67% between the specimens MCZ and MAS2,
3.1. Physical properties due to the addition of MgAl2 O4 .
For cold and hot modules of rupture the addition of MgAl2 O4
Physical properties of each refractory formulations studied spinel resulted in higher values compared to MCZ specimen.
during the first stage of this investigation are presented in Table 3. Moreover, the optimum content of spinel for both modulus of
According to the results, in general the apparent porosity was rupture was observed for the MAS1 specimen. The cold modulus
established around 2.1–3.2% for the refractory specimens, these increased 32.9% by the addition of MgAl2 O4 , while the hot
values could be registered due to a very fine powder and the modulus increased 144%.
high pressure of pressing used during the conformation stage As was observed in the laboratory and the industrial scales
(200 MPa). From the table we can observe that the apparent studies, the overall properties of the MgO–CaZrO3 refractory
porosity tends to diminish with the addition of the spinel phase. matrix were improved through the addition of the spinel phase.
In fact, in order to avoid thermal overloads it is desirable that the
refractory bricks present a certain level of porosity which may 3.2. X-ray diffraction analysis
promote the adhesion of a given coating.
According to the density, the tendency is to increase with the The X-ray diffraction (XRD) study obtained from each
increment of spinel content. Since the spinel phase has a lower refractory mixture studied in a laboratory scale revealed the
melting point than the rest of the components in the refractory presence of the same phases prior to sintering. However, after
matrix, it could be located in the high energy areas, i.e. the grain sintering new peaks are observed. In Fig. 1A, CaZrO3 and
boundary between MgO and CaZrO3 particles. Then, the spinel Ca0.15 Zr0.85 O1.85 peaks can be appreciated. Clearly, the increase
located in the grain boundaries may act as a doping agent inhib- in intensity of Ca0.15 Zr0.85 O1.85 phase, corresponds to the free
iting the grain boundary movement. As the grain boundaries are lime reacted with zirconia giving a zirconium dioxide stabi-
restrained to displace, the porosity will be consumed impacting lized by Ca2+ ions during the sintering process. This phase is
positively in the densification process. Beside, the spinel phase advantageous, since it can possibly develop a microcracks sys-
could be developing a ceramic bonding that provides an easy tem and then strengthening the refractory matrix. On the other
mass transport between MgO and CaZrO3 particles. hand, it is well known that microcraks are good stress absorbent
The mechanical analysis for the pressed specimens showed to prevent cracking propagation.14–16 According to diffraction
an increment in the cold crushing strength as the spinel con- patterns of MA1, MA2 and MA3 mixture, it was not possible to
tent was increased. The values of the crushing strength for detect spinel phase peak intensity due to the small concentration
the specimens MZ, MA1, MA2 and MA3 were determined used.
as 130 MPa, 237 MPa, 252 MPa and 321 MPa, respectively. As In the industrial scale, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) study
observed, there is an increment of approximately 245% between obtained from each refractory brick revealed the presence of the
the specimens MZ and MA3. This large increment in the crus- same phases prior to sintering. The phase analysis in the refrac-
hing strength allows us to scale this study at the industrial level. tory matrix without spinel addition showed periclase (MgO), as
In industrial bricks, the overall apparent porosity values well as calcium zirconate (CaZrO3 ). This indicates that there is
were estimated around 17–18%. The porosity level of the no evidence of formation of new phases.
E.A. Rodríguez et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 33 (2013) 2767–2774 2771
Fig. 2. SEM images of the MZ sample: (A) Dark grains-MgO and bright grains-CaZrO3 . (B) Dihedral angles. (C) Ceramic bonding between MgO and CaZrO3 . (D)
Spherical grains of CaZrO3 .
Fig. 3. SEM images of the MZ sample: (A) Spinel location at high magnifications and its corresponding EDS. (B) CaZrO3 avoiding abnormal grain growth
phenomenon.
3.4. Coatability and corrosion resistance refractory bricks for industrial scale (static and dynamic meth-
ods). In general, the hot face in every refractory was no corroded
Table 4 shows the results obtained for the coating adhe- by clinker liquid phases. Anyhow, it was registered a brown
sion in the samples at laboratory scale (static method) and molten phase entered up into the matrix. According to this
test, for the laboratory scale there was not a good compatibil-
Table 4 ity between the clinker raw material and the refractory matrix
Adherence test with clinker raw material. due to a null adherence in every formulation tested. Fig. 5A
Brick type Static test Dynamic test shows a SEM image from the MA3 specimen, revealing nei-
ther a microstructure without trace of clinke infiltration, nor
Infiltration distance (mm) Adherence Adherence
the presence of any detriments new phase. Thus, taking into
MZ – Null – account that the MA3 specimen represents the highest spinel
MA1 – Null –
content; the microstructure of these specimens suggests an
MA2 – Null –
MA3 – Null – excellent chemical stability in contact with the clinker raw mate-
MCZ 9.0 Strong Moderate rial.
MAS1 6.4 Strong Moderate For the industrial scale, MCZ refractory brick showed the
MAS2 5.6 Strong Moderate maximum coating adherence. In addition, CaZrO3 is very com-
MAS3 5.7 Moderate Moderate
patible with clinker phases, permitting a good coating adherence.
MAS4 5.7 Moderate Moderate
It is clear that there is a strong tendency to coating adherence
E.A. Rodríguez et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 33 (2013) 2767–2774 2773
Fig. 4. SEM images of refractory sample at industrial scale: (A) Without spinel content. (B and C) With addition of MgAl2 O4 spinel. (D) EDS corresponding
toMgAl2 O4 spinel.
at low spinel contents. However, at higher contents the coating The examination of the infiltrated region by cement clinker
adherence becomes moderate in spite of a porosity value similar in accordance to the SEM analysis corresponding to static and
to that registered by MCZ brick, since the spinel (MgAl2 O4 ) has dynamic tests resulted in a slightly densification without corro-
a low coating adherence. sion evidence; i.e. areas close to clinker did not suffer any kind
Fig. 5. SEM images of sample attacked by clinker raw meal (A) at laboratory scale without trace of clinker infiltration, (B–D) at industrial scale revealing a slightly
dense microstructure due to the clinker infiltration labeled as CK.
2774 E.A. Rodríguez et al. / Journal of the European Ceramic Society 33 (2013) 2767–2774
of alteration. The bonding strength still remained in all refrac- 15. Serena S, Sainz MA, De Aza S, Caballero A. Thermodynamic assessment
tory bricks. Fig. 5B–D revealed a slight dense microstructure of the system ZrO2 CaO–MgO using new experimental results. Calcula-
tion of the isopletal section dolomia–zircona. J Eur Ceram Soc 2005;25:
in all bricks due to the infiltration of clinker phases (labeled as
681–93.
CK “clinker phase” in the figures) located as interstitial parti- 16. Serena S, Sainz MA, Caballero A. The system clinker–MgO–CaZrO3 and
cles between periclase grains (dark gray) and calcium zirconate its application to the corrosion behavior of CaZrO3 /MgO refractory matrix
grains (light gray). by clinker. J Eur Ceram Soc 2009;29:2199–209.
17. Álvaro Obregón A, Rodríguez-Galicia JL, López-Cuevas J, Pena P, Baudín
C. MgO–CaZrO3 -based refractories for cement kilns. J Eur Ceram Soc
4. Conclusions
2011;31:61–74.
18. Chen M, Lu C, Yu J. Improvement in performance of MgO–CaO refractories
Through our study we can conclude: by addition of nano-sized ZrO2 . J Eur Ceram Soc 2007;27:4633–8.
There is a good correlation between laboratory and industrial 19. Rodríguez JL, Baudín C, Pena P. Relationships between phase constitution
results. and mechanical behaviour in MgO–CaZrO3 –calcium silicate materials. J
In the refractory mixtures (MgO–CaZrO3 ), an excellent bond Eur Ceram Soc 2004;24:669–79.
20. Rodríguez-Galicia JL, Fernandez-Arguijo B, Rendón-Ángeles JC, Valle FJ,
linkage between MgO and CaZrO3 grains was detected. In addi- Pena P. Reaction sintering of mexican dolomite–zircon mixtures. Boletin
tion, calcium zirconate avoided MgO abnormal grain growth in Soc Esp Ceram Vídrio 2005;44:185–91.
all the formulation studied here, thus this fact lead to a mechan- 21. Guo Z, Palco S, Rigaud M. Bonding of cement clinker onto doloma-based
ical reinforcement in the entire matrix. refractories. J Am Ceram Soc 2005;88:1481–7.
Spinel phase was located at the boundaries between MgO and 22. Rodríguez JL, Pena P. Obtención de materiales de magnesia-circonato dicál-
cico por sinterización reactiva de mezclas dolomita – circón, Estudio del
CaZrO3 particles acting as a bond linkage among these phases procesamiento. Boletin Soc Esp Ceram Vídrio 2001;40:463–71.
according to high magnification microstructural analyses and 23. Rodríguez JL, Rodríguez MA, De Aza S, Pena P. Reaction sintering of
EDS results. zircon–dolomite mixtures. J Eur Ceram Soc 2001;21:343–54.
The mechanical analyses indicate a cold crushing strength 24. Rodríguez JL, De Aza S, Pena P. Effect of agglomerate and grain size
tendency to increase with spinel addition. on the reaction sintering of zircon–dolomite mixtures. Brit Ceram Trans
2001;100:181–91.
25. Dávila JC. Refractarios magnesita-espinel para horno de cemento: experi-
References encias, limitaciones y alternativas. In: UNITECR89 proceedings. 1989. p.
306–23.
1. Peng C, Li N, Han B. Effect of zircon on sintering composition and 26. Rodríguez EA, Alan-Castillo G, Guzmán A-M. Effect of spinel “MgAl2 O4 ”
microstructure of magnesia powder. Sci Sinter 2009;41:11–7. on microstructural and mechano-chemical properties evolution in a sintered
2. Han B, Li Y, Guo C, Li N, Chen F. Sintering of MgO refractories with added MgO–CaZrO3 refractory matrix. Ind Ceram 2011;31:1–5.
WO3 . Ceram Int 2007;33:1563–7. 27. Rodríguez EA, Alan-Castillo G, Jose Contreras E, Das TK. Microstructure
3. Bartha P, Klischat HJ. Classification of magnesia bricks in rotary and properties of spinel–magnesia–zirconia–calcium zirconate refractory
cement kilns according to specification and service-ability. ZKG Int mixtures. In: UNITECR’07 congress. 2007. p. 612.
1994;47:277–80. 28. Rodríguez-Galicia JL, de Aza AH, Rendón-Angeles JC, Pena P. The mech-
4. Komatsu H, Arai M, Ukawa S. Current and future status of chrome-free anism of corrosion of MgO/CaZrO3 –calcium silicate materials by cement
bricks for rotary cement kilns. Taikabutsu Overseas 1999;19:3–9. clinker. J Eur Ceram Soc 2007;27:79–89.
5. Bartha P, Klischat HJ. Present state of the refractory lining for cement kilns. 29. Serena S, Sainz MA, Caballero A. Corrosion behavior of MgO/CaZrO3
CN Refract 1999;6:31–8. refractory matrix by clinker. J Eur Ceram Soc 2004;24:2399–406.
6. Andrzej A, Wajdowicz. Correlation of basic refractory brick development 30. Rodríguez EA, Castillo GA, Guzmán AM. Development of a chrome-free
with the evolution of cement industrial kilns. In: UNITECR’93 congress. refractory based on electrofused magnesia–calcium zirconate technology
1993. p. 173–97. using spinel addition for use in cement rotary kilns. In: UNITECR’09
7. Mukerji J. Refractory for cement rotary kiln. Jadarpur: Central Glass and congress. 2009. p. 072.
Ceramic Research Institute; 2013. p. 125–32. 31. Rodríguez E, Alan Castillo G, Contreras J, Aguilar Martínez JA, González Y,
8. Griffin DJ. The application of magnesia–zirconia brick in the burning zones Guzmán A-M, Laura I, Ortiz G. Desarrollo de un refractario MgO–CaZrO3
of rotary cement kilns. In: UNITECR’89 proceedings. 1989. p. 350–67. dopado con MgAl2 O4 para la industria cementera. Ciencias UANL
9. Partridge TJ. Cement kiln refractories the chrome-free solution. Export 2011;15:23–30.
Regional Sales Manager, Baker Refractories; 1996. p. 2–6. 32. Contreras JE, Castillo GA, Rodríguez EA. About the influence of electro-
10. Itoh K, Takemoto M, Ogata M. Recent trends in cement kiln refractories. fused FeAl2 O4 in a refractory base on MgO–CaZrO3 by sintering on this
Shinagawa Tech Rep 2000;43:45–58. properties. In: UNITECR’03. 2003.
11. Kozuka H, Kaita Y, Tuchiya Y, Honda T, Ohta S. New kind of chrome- 33. Contreras JE, Castillo GA, Rodríguez EA, Das TK, Guzmán AM.
free (MgO–CaO–ZrO2 ) bricks for burning zone of rotary cement kiln. In: Microstructure and properties of hercynite–magnesia–calcium zirconate
UNITECR’93. 1993. p. 1027–37. refractory mixtures. Mater Charact 2005;54:354–9.
12. Kozuka H, Kajita Y, Tuchiya Y, Honda T, Ohta S. Further improvements of 34. Edén Rodrígueza E, Alan Castillo A, Contreras J, Puente-Ornelas R,
MgO–CaO–ZrO2 refractory bricks. In: UNITECR. 1995. Aguilar-Martínez JA, García L, Gómez C. Hercynite and magnesium alumi-
13. Szczerba J. Calcium zirconate as the secondary phase of magnesia refrac- nate spinels acting as a ceramic bonding in an electrofused MgO–CaZrO3
tories for cement rotary kiln. Adv Sci Technol 2010;70:15–20. refractory brick for the cement industry. Ceram Int 2012;38(8):6769–75.
14. Serena S, Sainz MA, De Aza S, Caballero A. Experimental determination 35. Liddle J, Brett NH. Phase equilibria in the system CaO–MgO–Al2 O3 –ZrO2 .
and thermodynamic calculation of the ZrO2 –CaO–MgO phase equilibria Trans J Br Ceram Soc 1984;84:128–34.
diagram. Isothermal sections at 1600 ◦ C, 1700 ◦ C and 1750 ◦ C. J Am Ceram 36. Atlas S. Verein Deutscher Eisenhuttenleute (VDEh). 2nd ed. D-Dusseldorf,
Soc 2004;87:2268–74. Germany: Verlag Stahleisen GmbH; 1995. ISBN 3-514-00457-9.