Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Law of Evidence - Interim
Law of Evidence - Interim
SUBMITTED BY:-
IN
JANUARY 2020
The word witness means and includes various meanings by its nomenclature and may be used for
different purposes at a same time. The Black's Legal dictionary defines the word 'witness' in
various senses as- the person who sees a document signed, the person called to court to testify
and give evidence.
Furthermore, the Black's Legal dictionary defines the word 'witness' in 'noun' as in the primary
sense of the word, a witness is a person who has knowledge of an event. As the most direct mode
of acquiring knowledge of an event is by seeing it, "witness" has acquired the sense of a person
who is present at and observes a transaction.1 A witness is a person whose declaration under oath
(or affirmation) is received as evidence for any purpose, whether such declaration be made on
oral examination or by deposition or affidavit.2
1 State v. Desforges, 47 La. Ann. 1167, 17 South. 811; Bliss v. Shuman, 47 Me. 248.
2 Code Civ. Proc. Cal. {1878; Gen. St. Minn. 1878, c. 73.
The ' Concise Law Dictionary' defines the word 'witness' as one who gives evidence in a cause;
an indifferent person to each party, sworn to speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth.3
Furthermore in the case of Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab4, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
emphasized the importance of the witness in the criminal trail and proceeding and expressed that
'a criminal case is built on the edifice of evidence, evidence that is admissible in law. For that,
witnesses are required whether it is direct evidence or the circumstantial evidence”.
The Term police witness has not been defined under the Code or in the Evidence act. A police
officer is one who5:
(i) Is considered to be a police officer in a "common parlance" keeping into
focus the consequence provided under the Act.
(ii) Is capable of exercising influence or authority over a person from whom a
confession is obtained.
In this research paper I would be discussing whether police can be treated as a witness or not and
whether his evidence will be admissible in the court of law with the help of relevant case laws. I
would also be covering up topics like stock witness, trap/decoy or Spy witness and whether such
persons are considered as witnesses or not.
3 P. Ramanatha Iyer, “Concise Law Dictionary”, Wadhwa & Company, Nagpur, (8th edn., 2004), p.896.
4 2000 Cri. L.J p. 2780.
5 Tofan Singh V. State of Tamil Nadu 2013(4) JCC (Narcotics) 146; 2013(4) RCR (Cri) 631 (SC).
3. Whether trap/decoy or Spy witness are considered as witness under the Evidene act? Is
the evidence given by such witness admissible in the court of law?
Literature review:
1. The law of Evidence with latest case laws and legislative Amendments: Shakil Ahmad
Khan, 26th Edition, Lexis Nexis;
S. 125 - No Magistrate or Police – officer shall be compelled to say whence he got any information as
to the commission of any offence, and no Revenue – officer shall be compelled to say whence he got
any information as to the commission of any offence against the public revenue.
2. Witnesses in a criminal trial: Their role and efficacy; Ph.D Thesis.pdf, shodhganga
“There is no principle of law that a statement made in the court by police personnel has to be
disbelieved. It may not be believed. It is not that all policemen will tell lies. There are good and bad
people in all walks of life. There are good and bad policemen as well. Court cannot assume that every
statement of a policeman is necessarily false”
4. Law of Evidence, 19th Edition: Woodroffe and Amir Ali: Volume 4, Lexis Nexis.
Section 118 lays down the general rule as to the competency of witnesses. It suggests, what numerous
judges have observed, that in India the rule generally is in favor of the admission of evidence, thought
the weight to be attached to it will, of course, be a matter for the court’s consideration.
CASE LAWS:
Suresh Kumar V. State of Himachal Pradesh6
Pritam Singh V. State of Punjab7
Gora Singh V. State of Punjab8
Vinod Kumar V. State of Punjab9
Sumit Tomar V. State of Punjab
Rohtash Kumar V.State of Haryana
Banshilal V. State of Rajasthan
Chapterization:
This research paper has been divided into various chapters as stated under:
Chapter 1: Meaning of Witness and Evidence
This chapter will be defining and stating the meaning of witness. It would state who is and is not
a witness under the Evidence act. The word witness means and includes various meanings by its
nomenclature and may be used for different purposes at a same time. The Black's Legal
dictionary defines witness as the person who sees a document signed, the person called to court
to testify and give evidence. This chapter will also be dealing with the meaning of evidence as
per Sec. 3 of the India Evidence Act 1872.
Chapter 5: Conclusion
The last chapter will talk about the conclusion as well as the suggestions derived from the
research. It would talk about the current law and future prevailing amendments that can be made.
The conclusion part of the research paper will answer all the research questions and would state
the interpretation of the law with regard to police as a witness.