CHAPTER I

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Background of the Study

Typhoons are no doubt one of the Philippines biggest and most damaging natural

calamities. With its location being in the ring of fire, the Philippines is constantly a target of the

towing winds and typhoons of the Pacific. This has resulted in much damage to the economy and

many citizens both rich and poor. In this research paper the concept of aerodynamic shape

utilization in architecture to resist wind interaction with structures is proposed and carefully

tackled. But first, what exactly is aerodynamics? Aerodynamics is the study of the motion of air,

particularly its interaction with a solid object, such as an airplane wing.. Many architects have

utilized aerodynamic shapes in structural design. This is because aerodynamic shapes, such as

the wings of an aeroplane or the shape of modern trains, allow wind to pass around it instead of

slamming into it. This integration of aerodynamic shapes into architecture has proven to be

useful and effective in many different aspects. An example of this can be seen in the Colosseum

which has been standing since A.D. 72. The round shape of this structure’s walls allows the

passing wind to blow around it. Its circular shape also aids in resisting or absorbing seismic

shock, because of the free distribution of the vibration around the circumference of its walls.

Unsurprisingly, the oldest forms of indigenous shelter were often round in shape.

Examples of these are the Southwest USA Hogan, Mongolian Yurt, North American Teepee and

the Greek Tenemos. But why did our ancestors choose to build round? Because the smooth shape

of rounded objects— eggs, earth, tree trunks, and stones — is what they saw reflected in the

1
surrounding natural environment. And, as usual, Mother Nature knows best. There is some nifty

natural science that makes round buildings more comfortable, more energy-efficient and safer —

especially if you combine the ancient shape with modern materials.

Wind and tsunami waves move naturally around a round building rather than getting

caught at (and potentially ripping off) corners. A rounded roof avoids ‘air-planing’- a situation

where a strong wind lifts the roof structure up and off of the building.

There are dozens of interconnected points in a round home. These are sites where

builders can connect parts of the building together. In the olden days, the connecting materials

were rope, vine and hides. Modern materials are engineered components- like a center radial

steel ring, steel brackets, Seismic and hurricane ties, bolts and steel cables. These connect the

structural pieces and give the building a unique combination of flexibility and strength- qualities

which causes them to be significantly safer in severe weather conditions like earth quakes,

extreme winds and even hail or heavy snow-fall.

There are already many proofs of the effectiveness of aerodynamically-shaped structures.

In this paper, however, the level of effectiveness of such structures will be identified and

regarded in relation to its use in the location, Barangay Dalahican, Lucena City.

2
Statement of the Problem

This research study entitled, “The Level of Effectiveness of an Aerodynamically-Shaped

Structure in Withstanding the Impact of Typhoon Calamities in Lucena City”, aims to determine

the level of effectiveness of aerodynamically-shaped structures in lessening the impact of

typhoons.

Specifically, this study seeks to answer the following questions:

1) What is the level of effectiveness of an aerodynamically-shaped structure in withstanding

natural calamities?

2) What is the level of cost effectiveness of the construction of an aerodynamically shaped

home?

3) What is the level of effectiveness of the material utilization of an aerodynamically shaped

structure?

4) What is the level of effectiveness of the design of an aerodynamically-shaped home?

5) What is the level of durability of an aerodynamically-shaped structured?

3
Significance of the Study

The researchers conducted this study for the benefit of the residents of Barangay

Dalahican Lucena City, Quezon. Because Dalahican is a coastal area and is prone to the

damaging effect of typhoon calamities, this will be beneficial to the residents of Dalahican in

terms of the people it can shelter and lessening typhoons’ damage on the community and its

economy. This study will result in a safe living for the residents in terms of the impact of the

typhoon and other such calamities.

This study may also serve as a basis for further study concerning the capacity of

aerodynamically-shaped structures to withstand the impact of the calamities or other studies

related to it.

Definition of Terms

Aerodynamic. This describes the qualities of an object that affect how easily it is able to move

through the air (Dunbar, 2011).

Aerodynamically. This describes how an object is designed with rounded or smooth edges so as

to reduce wind drag and thereby increase efficiency (Hatch, 2013).

Credibility. Credibility defines the quality of being trusted and believed in (Credibility, 2017).

Strata. Strata is the plural of stratum which describes one of a number of portions or divisions

likened to layers or levels (Strata, 2017).

Stratified. Something that is formed or placed in strata or layers (Stratified, 2017)..

4
Withstanding. An object that withstands offers strong resistance or opposition to something

(Withstanding, 2017).

Seismic. Seismic refers to earthquakes or other vibrations of the earth and its crust generated by

the tectonic plates. (Seismic, 2017).

Lateral Load. Lateral loads are usually live loads whose main component is a horizontal force

acting on the structure. Typical lateral loads would be a wind load against a facade, an

earthquake, the earth pressure against a beach front retaining wall or the earth pressure against a

basement wall (Harvey, 2016).

Polygon. A polygon is a plane figure with at least three straight sides and angles, and typically

five or more (Polygon, 2017).

Heptadecagon. In geometry, a heptadecagon or is a seventeen-sided polygon.

Hexagonal Gazebo. A hexagonal gazebo is a pavilion structure, sometimes octagonal or turret-

shaped, with a roof of the same shape (Hexagonal Gazebo, 2017).

Marine Plywood. Marine plywood is a good-quality, hardwood plywood made with waterproof

glue (Taylor, 2017).

Laminated Glass. Laminated Glass is a type of safety glass that holds together when shattered.

In the event of breaking, it is held in place by an interlayer (Laminated Glass, 2017).

Reinforced Concrete. Reinforced concrete is concrete in which wire mesh or steel bars are

embedded to increase its tensile strength (Reinforced Concrete, 2017).

Eaves. Eaves are the part of a roof that meets or overhangs the walls of a building (Eaves, 2017).

5
Concrete Slab. Concrete slabs are a common structural element of modern buildings. Horizontal

slabs of steel, typically between 4 and 20 inches (100 and 500 millimeters) thick. (Concrete Slab,

2017).

6
References

Dunbar, Brian. (2011). What Is Aerodynamics? Retrieved from

https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/what-is-

aerodynamics-k4.html

Hatch, Michael. (2013). Aerodynamic Architectural Design. Retrieved from

https://www.behance.net/gallery/9068605/Aerodynamic-Architectural-Design

Credibility. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/credibility

Strata. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/strata

Stratified. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/stratified

Withstanding. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/withstanding

Seismic. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/seismic

Harvey, Matthew. (2016). Lateral Loads. Retrieved from

http://web.mit.edu/4.441/1_lectures/1_lecture18/1_lecture18.html

Polygon. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

7
 Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/polygon

Heptagon. (2017). Retrieved from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heptadecagon

Hexagonal Gazebo. (2017). Retrieved from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexagonal_gazebo

Taylor, Lisa Hallett. (2017). What is Marine-Grade Plywood? Retrieved from

https://www.thespruce.com/what-is-marine-grade-plywood-2736672

Laminated Glass. (2017). Retrieved from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laminated_glass

Reinforced Concrete. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/Reinforced_concrete

Eaves. (2017). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from

Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/eaves

Concrete Slab. (2017). Retrieved from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concrete_slab

8
 CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

One of the disasters that typically occur in our locale of the study is typhoons. This type

of large weather disturbance with a spiral system of violent winds, torrential rains, flooding and

typically hundreds of kilo meters in diameter poses a frequent hazard in the Philippines,

damaging a significant number of structures. (What Is the Difference Between a Hurricane, a

Cyclone, and a Typhoon?, 2017).

Since excessive wind loads are a significant cause of the compromise of a structure’s

integrity, wind factors must be emphasized and carefully considered in the design and

construction of buildings and houses. In aerodynamics, streamlined designs help the air close

more smoothly around objects and reduce pressure drag in automobiles and aircraft and air

resistance or greater wind load in structures. Because of this, the mitigation of the intensity of the

wind force through aerodynamic modification of the external shape can be fundamental for

meeting the performance goals (Aerodynamic Principles That Led to the Shape of the Zoleco,

2012)

The purpose of this research is to create a basic investigation guidance for buildings and

their aerodynamic modifications as a resource for architects, engineers, developers, and students.

It aims to make a contribution to and strengthen particularly the architect’ s understanding of tall

building design, that requires a high level of interdisciplinary approach, by providing a broad

overview of the “ tall building” with its general concepts to demonstrate the importance of

human element as a critical component in the design of tall building by clarifying the wind forces

and resulting movements which cause discomfort to building occupants and create serious

9
serviceability issues and to show the significance of aerodynamic modifications as an effective

design approach in terms of mitigating wind excitation. In order to achieve these purposes,

firstly, a comprehensive literature survey, which includes the definition, emergence and

historical background, basic planning and design parameters, and lateral load considerations of

tall buildings is presented (Amin, 2010).

A circle encloses the largest area for a given amount of perimeter, reducing the amount of

material needed (Alter, 2014). The round shape requires 10% less wall than a square, and almost

15% less than a rectangle, to enclose the same floor area. This means less exterior wall and less

foundation wall to pay for initially, as well as less maintenance and less heat loss over the life of

the building.

This self-supporting design allows non load bearing interior walls to be placed as desired.

Allowing greater flexibility in designing the interior spaces.

Open floor plans of round houses allow for the easy flow of natural air circulation and

natural lighting thoughout.

A building's shape is reported by energy experts to be the single most important factor

affecting energy consumption. Less surface area exposed to the elements, better airflow in and

around the building can mean substantial savings in energy costs. The circle is the strongest

shape in nature, and man has copied nature in designs where strength is needed. (When did you

last see a square grain bin, silo, tanker truck, rocket or submarine?)

Round house open floor plans are much more convenient with easier access from one

area to another and in many cases no cost or space wasting hallways. A circular structure

10
withstands wind loads better than a square or rectangle. Because the wind hits a smaller portion

of the wall surface and then flows around the structure, a round building typically withstands

higher wind forces. The aerodynamic shape allows winds to move around a round building rather

than developing destructive high and low air pressure areas that occur with flat walls.

Full Circle Shelters designs are multi-sided polygons rather than true circles. This allows

the efficient use of today's commonly available building materials while maintaining the benefits

of the circular shape. The circular shape of these designs allows for open floor plans and natural

lighting and air circulation (Why Round, 2013).

R. Buckminster Fuller explains it best in this short video, found on the wonderful website

Round houses: Architecture, notes and musings. When asked "Why a round house?" Bucky

answers:

The only reason that houses have been rectangular all these years is that, that is all we

could do with the materials we had. Now with modern materials and technology, we can apply to

houses the same efficiency of engineering that we apply to suspension bridges and airplanes. The

whole thing is as modern as a streamlined plan.

The superior aerodynamic behavior of a round house reduces the wind pressure load

acting on the building to its minimum -- less than half that of a square building and much less

than irregular building forms, making it's round form the most effective, least expensive to

withstand high winds (Ross 2017).

11
 References

Aerodynamic Optimization of Building Shapes. (2017). Retrieved from

http://www.seminarsonly.com/Civil_Engineering/aerodynamic-optimization-of-building-

shapes.php

Ross, Rachel. (2017). Why Our Ancestors Built Round Houses.

Retrieved from http://inhabitat.com/why-our-ancestors-built-round-houses-and-why-it-

still-makes-sense-to-build-round-structures-today/

Aerodynamic Modifications to the Shape of the Buildings (2010). Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268188171_Aerodynamic_modifications_to_th

e_shape_of_the_buildings_A_review_of_the_state-of-the-art

Alter, Lloyd. (2014). "Mr. Fuller, Why would you build a round house?". Retrieved from

https://www.treehugger.com/green-architecture/mr-fuller-why-would-you-build-round-

house.html

Why Round. (2013). Retrieved from http://fullcircleshelters.com/whyround.html

Aerodynamic Principles That Led to the Shape of the Zoleco. (2012). Retrieved from

www.zoleco.ca/aerodynamic-principles-.html

Woodford, Chris. (2016). Aerodynamics: an Introduction.

http://www.explainthatstuff.com/aerodynamics.html

What Is the Difference Between a Hurricane, a Cyclone, and a Typhoon? (2017). Retrieved from

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/cyclone.html

12
 CHAPTER III

REASEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter will be dedicated to the description of the methods and procedures done in

order to obtain the data, how they will be analysed, interpreted, and how the conclusion will be

met. This section is to justify the means in which the study was obtained and will help in giving

it purpose and strength as it will then be truthful and analytical. All these will help in the

processing of the data and the formulation of conclusions.

Research Design

This research is a correlational kind of research which aims to correlate the utilization of

aerodynamic shapes in structures and the intensity of the impact of typhoons on such structures.

By determining the relationship between these two variables, the researchers are able to prove or

disprove the hypothesis of this study as well as whether the construction of an aerodynamically-

shaped home in Barangay Dalahican, Lucena City is effective in cost, material, design, as well as

durability.

Locale of the Study

The locale of our study is Dalahican, Lucena. We chose this location because it is a

coastal area and is vulnerable to typhoon disasters during which the integrity of the structures is

compromised. In this setting, the researchers are able to easily test the hypothesis of this study

because the necessary variables are present.

13
Population and Sample of the Study

Because this research needs data from different respondents of different classifications,

the sampling method used is the stratified sampling method.

The population and division of strata the samples or respondents were selected from are:

 Professionals with a background in architecture

 Professionals with a background in engineering

As for the sample, the researchers collected a sample of 10 professionals with a background in

architecture and 10 professionals with a background in engineering who work in Lucena City.

The researchers chose the aforementioned as respondents because their profession and prior

knowledge concerning the subject ensures credible and reliable data that is essential to the

research.

Research Instruments

The research instruments used were surveys or structured questionnaires to gather the

necessary data in testing the research’s hypothesis. The scaling of measurement in these survey

questionnaires are in the form of an ordinal rating scale as in the Likert scale in which the ranks

of effectiveness are listed as:

1. Strongly not effective

2. Not effective

3. Neutral

14
 4. Effective

5. Strongly effective

The research uses a negative to positive scale from one to five using the listed option of

responses stated above to represent each number in this quantitative research.

Control of Extraneous Variables

As for the control of extraneous variables, first the researchers identified the extraneous

variables that may compromise this research and determine the way(s) to control them/it. In this

study, the extraneous variable most prominent is the speed and strength of the typhoons, as stated

in the hypothesis.

In this study, the extraneous variable most prominent is the subjective opinions of the

respondents, which will directly affect the data that will be gathered. This variable, however, did

not need to compromise the research, by stating the need for basis for each of their answers.

15
 CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALLYSIS, AND ITERPRETAION OF THE STUDY

Results of the Study

The following tables describe the frequency as well as the percentage distribution of the

respondents’ responses. Along with this, the majority of the responses to each question were

identified and described accordingly. Above and below each table is a label and description

respectively of the focus of its content.

PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Tables 1.1-1.6

The questionnaires cover the demographic profile of the respondents and their familiarity

with the research topic. Although this information will help put the gathered data into context,

the data gathered in this portion of the questionnaire, is not the core of the research.

1.1 GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

Gender of the Frequency Percentage Total

Respondents Distribution Distribution
Male 10 50% 10
Female 10 50% 10
Total 20 100% 20

Table 1.1 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Gender of the Respondents

The data in Table 1.1 of the survey questionnaire shows the gender of the respondents. 10

out of 20 of the respondents were male comprising 50% of the population, while the remaining

10 out of 20 of the respondents were female comprising 50% of the population.

16
 Thus, it can be concluded that male and female respondents make up an equal amount of

the population.

1.2 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Age Frequency Percentage Total

Distribution Distribution
51-60 12 60% 12
41-50 2 10% 2
31-40 3 15% 3
21-30 3 15% 3
Total 20 100% 20

Table 1.2 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Age of the Respondents

The data in Table 1.2 of the survey questionnaire shows the age of the respondents. 12

out of 20 respondents were in the age bracket of 51-60 year olds compromising 60% of the

population, 2 out of 20 respondents were in the age bracket of 41-50 year olds compromising

10% of the population, 3 out of 20 respondents were in the age bracket of 31- 40 year olds

comprising 15% of the population, while another 3 out of 20 respondents were in the age bracket

of 21- 30 year olds comprising 15% of the population.

Therefore, the majority of the population belong to the age bracket of 51-60 year olds

which comprise 60% of the total population and 12 out of 20 of the respondents.

PART II: FAMILIARITY OF THE RESPONDENTS WITH THE RESEARCH TOPIC

Q1. Are you familiar with the term “aerodynamic”?

Level of Familiarity Frequency Percentage Total

of the respondents in Distribution Distribution
Q1
Yes 18 90% 18
No 2 10% 2
Total 20 100% 20

Table 2.1 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Gender of the Respondents

17
 The data in Table 2.1 show the familiarity of the respondents with the term

“aerodynamic”. 18 out of 20 respondents are familiar with the term “aerodynamic”, comprising

90% of the population, while 2 out of 20 respondents are not familiar with the term

“aerodynamic”, comprising 10% of the total population.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the majority of the population are familiar with the

term “aerodynamic”, comprising 90% of the population and 18 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q2. Are you familiar with the use of aerodynamics in architecture?

Level of Familiarity Frequency Percentage Total

of the respondents in Distribution Distribution
Q2
Yes 16 80% 16
No 4 20% 4
Total 20 100% 20

Table 2.2 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Familiarity of the Respondents

in Q2

The data in Table 2.2 show the familiarity of the respondents of the use of aerodynamics

in architecture. 16 out of 20 respondents are familiar with the use of aerodynamics in architecture

comprising 80% of the population, while 4 out of 20 respondents are not familiar with use of

aerodynamics in architecture, comprising 20% of the total population.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the majority of the population are familiar with the

use of aerodynamics in architecture, comprising 80% of the population and 16 out of 20 of the

respondents.

18
Q3. Are you aware of the effects of using aerodynamics in architectural design?

Level of Awareness Frequency Percentage Total

of the respondents in Distribution Distribution
Q3
Yes 15 75% 16
No 5 25% 4
Total 20 100% 20

Table 2.3 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Awareness of the Respondents

in Q3

The data in Table 2.3 show the awareness of the respondents of the effects of using

aerodynamics in architectural design. 15 out of 20 respondents are aware with effects of using

aerodynamics in architectural design, comprising 75% of the population, while 5 out of 20

respondents are not aware with use of aerodynamics in architecture, comprising 25% of the total

population.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the majority of the population are aware of the effects

of using aerodynamics in architectural design, comprising 75% of the population and 15 out of

20 of the respondents.

Q4. Are you a resident of Lucena City who has prior knowledge on the use of aerodynamic
design in structures?

The respondents are Frequency Percentage Total

residents of Lucena Distribution Distribution
City
Yes 15 75% 15
No 5 25% 5
Total 20 100% 20

Table 2.4 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents if they are residents of

Lucena City

19
 The data in Table 2.4 shows whether respondents are residence of Lucena City with

prior knowledge on the use of aerodynamic design structures. 15 out of 20 of the respondents are

residents of Lucena City with prior knowledge on the use of aerodynamic design in structures,

comprising 75% out of 100% of the total population. 5 out of 20 of the respondents are not

resident of Lucena City with prior knowledge on the use of aerodynamic design in structures,

comprising 25% out of 100% of the total population.

Therefore the majority of the respondents are residents of Lucena City with prior

knowledge on the use of aerodynamic design in structures, comprising 75% out of 100% of the

total population and 15 out of 20 of the respondents.

PART III: COST

Q1. The construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is cost efficient considering its

role in withstanding typhoons.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q1
Strongly Effective 13 65% 13
Effective 6 30% 6
Neutral 0 0% 0
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 1 5% 1
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 3.1 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q1

The data in Table 3.1 shows the respondents level effectiveness with the claim, “The

construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is cost efficient considering its role in

withstanding typhoons.” 13 out of 20 respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising

20
65% of the total population, 0 out of 20 not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total

population, another 0 out of 20 respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising

0% of the total population, 6 out of 20 respondents effective with the claim, comprising 30% of

the total population, 1 out of 20 strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 5% of the total

population.

Therefore the majority of the population strongly effective with the claim that the

construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is cost efficient considering its role in

withstanding typhoons. This comprises 65% of the population and 13 out of 20 of the

respondents.

Q2. The construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is affordable to people in the

working class.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q2
Strongly Effective 4 20% 4
Effective 11 55% 0
Neutral 4 20% 4
Not Effective 1 5% 11
Strongly Not 0 0% 1
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 3.2 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q2

The data in Table 3.2 shows the respondents level effectiveness with the claim, “The

construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is affordable to people in the working class.” 4

out of 20 respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 20% of the total population,

21
1 out of 20 not effective with the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, another 4 out of

20 respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 20% of the total

population,11 out of 20 respondents effective with the claim, comprising 55% of the total

population, 0 out of 20 strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total

population.

Therefore the majority of the population effective with the claim that the construction of

an aerodynamically-shaped home is affordable to people in the working class. This comprises

55% of the population and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q3. The construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is affordable to people in the

lower class.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q3
Strongly Effective 2 10% 2
Effective 5 25% 5
Neutral 3 15% 3
Not Effective 7 35% 7
Strongly Not 3 15% 3
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 3.3 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q3

The data in Table 3.3 shows the respondents level effectiveness with the claim, “The

construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is affordable to people in the lower class.” 2out

of 20 respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 10% of the total population, 7

out of 20 disagree with the claim, comprising 35% of the total population, another 3 out of 20

22
respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 15% of the total population,5

out of 20 respondents effective with the claim, comprising 25% of the total population, 3 out of

20 strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 15% of the total population.

Therefore the majority of the population not effective with the claim that the construction

of an aerodynamically-shaped home is affordable to people in the lower class. This comprises

35% of the population and 7 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q4. The complexity of the structure will require larger budget.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q4
Strongly Effective 6 30% 6
Effective 12 60% 12
Neutral 1 5% 1
Not Effective 1 5% 1
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 3.4 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q4

The data in Table 3.4 shows the respondents level effectiveness with the claim, “The

complexity of the structure will require larger budget.” 6 out of 20 respondents strongly

effective with the claim, comprising 30% of the total population, 1 out of 20 not effective with

the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, another 1 out of 20 respondents have a neutral

stand towards the claim, comprising 5% of the total population,12 out of 20 respondents

effective with the claim, comprising 60% of the total population, 0 out of 20 strongly not

effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

23
 Therefore the majority of the population effective with the claim that the complexity of

the structure will require larger budget. This comprises 60% of the population and 12 out of 20

of the respondents.

Q5. The construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home can be adjusted to the people’s

budget.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q5
Strongly Effective 6 30% 6
Effective 11 55% 11
Neutral 3 15% 3
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 3.5 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q5

The data in Table 3.5 shows the respondents level acceptance with the claim, “The

construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home can be adjusted to the people’s budget.” 6 out

of 20 respondents strongly agree with the claim, comprising 30% of the total population, 0 out of

20 disagree with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population, another 3 out of 20

respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 15% of the total population,11

out of 20 respondents agree with the claim, comprising 55% of the total population, 0 out of 20

strongly disagree with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

24
 Therefore the majority of the population agree with the claim that the construction of an

aerodynamically-shaped home can be adjusted to the people’s budget. This comprises 55% of the

population and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

PART IV: MATERIALS

Q1. The construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home can use readily available

materials and still maintain stability.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q1
Strongly Effective 8 40% 8
Effective 11 55% 11
Neutral 1 5% 1
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 4.1 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q1

The data in the Table 4.1 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home can use readily available materials

and still maintain stability.” 8 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim,

comprising 40% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the

claim, comprising 0% of the total population, 1 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand

towards the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, 11 out of 20 of the respondents

effective with the claim, comprising 55% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents

strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

25
 Therefore the majority of the respondents e with the claim that the construction of an

aerodynamically-shaped home can use readily available materials and still maintain stability.

This comprises 55% of the total population and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q2. Reinforced concrete is effective in withstanding earthquakes.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q2
Strongly Effective 6 30% 6
Effective 12 60% 12
Neutral 2 10% 2
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 4.2 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q2

The data in the Table 4.2 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “Reinforced concrete is effective in withstanding earthquakes.” 6 out of 20 of the

respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 30% of the total population, 0 out of

20 of the respondents disagree with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population, 2 out of 20

of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 10% of the total

population, 12 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim, comprising 60% of the total

population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0%

of the total population.

26
 Therefore the majority of the respondents effective with the claim that Reinforced

concrete is effective in withstanding earthquakes. This comprises 60% of the total population and

12 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q3. Reinforced concrete is effective in withstanding the fire calamities.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q3
Strongly Effective 11 55% 11
Effective 8 40% 8
Neutral 0 0% 0
Not Effective 1 5% 1
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 4.3 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q3

The data in the Table 4.3 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “Reinforced concrete is effective in withstanding the fire calamities.” 11 out of 20 of the

respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 55% of the total population, 1 out of

20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, 0 out

of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 0% of the total

population, 8 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim, comprising 40% of the total

population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0%

of the total population.

27
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim that reinforced

concrete is effective in withstanding the fire calamities. This comprises 55% of the total

population and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q4. Laminated glass an effective material to use during the high-winds and typhoons.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q4
Strongly Effective 4 20% 4
Effective 11 55% 11
Neutral 4 20% 4
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 1 5% 1
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 4.4 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q4

The data in the Table 4.4 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “Laminated glass an effective material to use during the high-winds and typhoons.” 4 out

of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 20% of the total

population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the

total population, 4 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim,

comprising 20% of the total population, 11 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim,

comprising 55% of the total population, 1 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with

the claim, comprising 5% of the total population.

28
 Therefore the majority of the respondents effective with the claim that laminated glass an

effective material to use during the high-winds and typhoons. This comprises 55% of the total

population and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q5. Metal Framing increases the stability of the structure.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q5
Strongly Effective 12 60% 12
Effective 7 35% 7
Neutral 1 5% 1
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 4.5 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q5

The data in the Table 4.5 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “Metal Framing increases the stability of the structure.” 12 out of 20 of the respondents

strongly effective with the claim, comprising 60% of the total population, 0 out of 5 of the

respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population, 1 out of 20 of

the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, 7

out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim, comprising 35% of the total population, 0

out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total

population.

29
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim that metal

Framing increases the stability of the structure. This comprises 60% of the total population and

12 out of 20 of the respondents.

V: DESIGN

Q1. The circular polygonal shape of the structure maximizes space.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q1
Strongly Effective 3 15% 3
Effective 4 20% 4
Neutral 10 50% 10
Not Effective 1 1% 1
Strongly Not 2 10% 2
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 5.3 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q3

The data in the Table 5.1 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The circular polygonal shape of the structure maximizes space.” 3 out of 20 of the

respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 15% of the total population, 1 out of

20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, 10 out

of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 50% of the total

population, 4 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim, comprising 20% of the total

population, 2 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 10%

of the total population.

30
 Therefore the majority of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim that the

circular polygonal shape of the structure maximizes space. This comprises 50% of the total

population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q2. An aerodynamically shaped structure is effective in shedding wind.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q2
Strongly Effective 13 65% 13
Effective 6 30% 6
Neutral 1 5% 1
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 5.2 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q2

The data in the Table 5.2 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “An aerodynamically shaped structure is effective in shedding wind.” 13 out of 20 of the

respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 65% of the total population, 0 out of

20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population, 1 out

of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 5% of the total

population, 6 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim, comprising 30% of the total

population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0%

of the total population.

31
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim an

aerodynamically shaped structure is effective in shedding wind. This comprises 65% of the total

population and 13 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q3.The aerodynamic shape of a structure can help withstand the high winds of typhoons
that pass through Lucena.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q3
Strongly Effective 9 45% 9
Effective 10 50% 10
Neutral 1 5% 1
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 5.3 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q3

The data in the Table 5.3 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The aerodynamic shape of a structure can help withstand the high winds of typhoons that

pass through Lucena.” 9 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim,

comprising 45% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the

claim, comprising 0% of the total population, 1 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand

towards the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, 10 out of 20 of the respondents

effective with the claim, comprising 50% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents

strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

32
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim that the

aerodynamic shape of a structure can help withstand the high winds of typhoons that pass

through Lucena. This comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q4. A modified hexagonal gazebo type roof, makes a structure resilient to high winds and
typhoons.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q4
Strongly Effective 5 25% 5
Effective 10 50% 10
Neutral 4 20% 4
Not Effective 1 5% 1
Strongly Not 4 20% 4
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 5.4 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q4

The data in the Table 5.4 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “A modified hexagonal gazebo type roof, makes a structure resilient to high winds and

typhoons.” 5 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 25% of

the total population, 1 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 5%

of the total population, 4 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim,

comprising 20% of the total population, 10 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim,

comprising 50% of the total population, 4 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective

with the claim, comprising 20% of the total population.

33
 Therefore the majority of the respondents effective with the claim that a modified

hexagonal gazebo type roof, makes a structure resilient to high winds and typhoons This

comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q5. The consideration of wind factors is important in choosing the roof style of a structure.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q5
Strongly Effective 14 70% 14
Effective 6 30% 6
Neutral 0 0% 0
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 5.5 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q5

The data in the Table 5.5 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The consideration of wind factors is important in choosing the roof style of a structure.”

14 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 70% of the total

population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the

total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim,

comprising 0% of the total population, 6 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim,

comprising 30% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective

with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

34
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim that the

consideration of wind factors is important in choosing the roof style of a structure. This

comprises 70% of the total population and 14 out of 20 of the respondents.

PART VI: DURABILITY

Q1. The strong foundation of the structure increases the stability of the structure and
makes it safer.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q1
Strongly Effective 17 85% 17
Effective 3 15% 3
Neutral 0 0% 0
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 6.1 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q1

The data in the Table 6.1 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The strong foundation of the structure increases the stability of the structure and makes it

safer.” 17 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 85% of the

total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of

the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim,

comprising 0% of the total population, 3 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim,

comprising 15% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with

the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

35
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim that the strong

foundation of the structure increases the stability of the structure and makes it safer. This

comprises 85% of the total population and 17 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q2. The design of an aerodynamically shaped structure makes it effective in sheltering

people and objects inside during natural disasters.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q2
Strongly Effective 10 50% 10
Effective 9 45% 9
Neutral 1 5% 1
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 6.2 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q2

The data in the Table 6.2 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The design of an aerodynamically shaped structure makes it effective in sheltering

people and objects inside during natural disasters.” 10 out of 20 of the respondents strongly

effective with the claim, comprising 50% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents

not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population, 1 out of 20 of the

respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, 9 out

of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim, comprising 45% of the total population, 0 out

of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total

population.

36
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim that the design

of an aerodynamically shaped structure makes it effective in sheltering people and objects inside

during natural disasters. This comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the

respondents.

Q3. The design of the structure makes it effective in withstanding calamities that commonly
occur in Lucena.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q3
Strongly Effective 11 55% 11
Effective 8 40% 8
Neutral 1 5% 1
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 6.3 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q3

The data in the Table 6.3 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The design of the structure makes it effective in withstanding calamities that commonly

occur in Lucena.” 11 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising

55% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the claim,

comprising 0% of the total population, 1 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand

towards the claim, comprising 5% of the total population, 8 out of 20 of the respondents effective

with the claim, comprising 40% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents strongly

not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

37
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim the design of

the structure makes it effective in withstanding calamities that commonly occur in Lucena. This

comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

Q4. The integration of aerodynamics into the architectural design of a structure is an

effective way to improve the stability of a structure.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q4
Strongly Effective 10 50% 10
Effective 7 35% 7
Neutral 3 15% 3
Not Effective 0 0% 0
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 6.4 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q4

The data in the Table 6.4 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The integration of aerodynamics into the architectural design of a structure is an effective

way to improve the stability of a structure.” 10 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective

with the claim, comprising 50% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents not

effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population, 3 out of 20 of the respondents

have a neutral stand towards the claim, comprising 15% of the total population, 7 out of 20 of the

respondents effective with the claim, comprising 35% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the

respondents strongly not effective with the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

38
 Therefore the majority of the respondents strongly effective with the claim the integration

of aerodynamics into the architectural design of a structure is an effective way to improve the

stability of a structure.. This comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the

respondents.

Q5. The round polygonal shape of the structure transfers environmental loads most
efficiently providing extra resilience and performance during critical events, especially
earthquakes.

Level of Frequency Percentage Total

Effectiveness of the Distribution Distribution
responses of the
respondents in Q5
Strongly Effective 8 40% 8
Effective 8 40% 8
Neutral 3 15% 3
Not Effective 1 5% 1
Strongly Not 0 0% 0
Effective
Total 20 100% 20

Table 6.5 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Level of Effectiveness of the responses

of the respondents in Q5

The data in the Table 6.5 shows the level of effectiveness of the respondents towards the

claim, “The round polygonal shape of the structure transfers environmental loads most

efficiently providing extra resilience and performance during critical events, especially

earthquakes.” 8 out of 20 of the respondents strongly effective with the claim, comprising 40%

of the total population, 1 out of 20 of the respondents not effective with the claim, comprising

5% of the total population, 3 out of 20 of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the claim,

comprising 15% of the total population, 8 out of 20 of the respondents effective with the claim,

39
comprising 40% of the total population, 0 out of 20 of the respondents strongly not effective with

the claim, comprising 0% of the total population.

Therefore an equal amount of the respondents who strongly effective and agreed that the

round polygonal shape of the structure transfers environmental loads most efficiently providing

extra resilience and performance during critical events, especially earthquakes, make up the

majority of the population, each comprising 40% of the population and 8 out of 20 respondents.

40
 CHAPTER V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of Findings

Based on the study, the majority of the respondents are in the age bracket of 51-60 with the

percentage of 60% and it comprises of equal amount of male and female with the percentage of

50% for the male and also 50% for the female.

 In terms of familiarity, it can be concluded that the majority of the population are familiar

with the term “aerodynamic”, comprising 90% of the population and 18 out of 20 of the

respondents in question number 1.

 In terms of the utilization of aerodynamic shapes in architecture, the majority of the

population are familiar with the use of aerodynamics in architecture, comprising 80% of

the population and 16 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In terms of the respondents’ prior knowledge, the majority of the respondents are

residents of Lucena City with prior knowledge on the use of aerodynamic design in

structures, comprising 75% out of 100% of the total population and 15 out of 20 of the

respondents.

 In terms of cost, it can be concluded that the majority of the population find the structure

strongly effective, based on the claim that the construction of an aerodynamically-shaped

home is cost efficient considering its role in withstanding typhoons to which they

strongly agreed with. This comprises 65% of the population and 13 out of 20 of the

respondents.

41
 In the second question concerning cost effectiveness, it can be concluded that the

majority of the population find the structure effective, based on the claim that the

construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home is affordable to people of the working

class, and find the structure effective in terms of this claim concerning cost, to which they

agree with. This comprises 55% of the population and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the third question concerning cost effectiveness, it can be concluded that the majority

of the population disagree with the claim that the construction of an aerodynamically-

shaped home is affordable to people of the lower class, and do not find the structure cost

effective This comprises 35% of the population and 7 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the fourth question concerning cost effectiveness, it is shown that the majority of the

population find the structure effective based on the claim that the complexity of the

structure will require larger budget. This comprises 60% of the population and 12 out of

20 of the respondents.

 In the fifth question concerning cost effectiveness, the majority of the population find the

structure effective based on the claim that the construction of an aerodynamically-shaped

home can be adjusted to the people’s budget. This comprises 55% of the population and

11 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In terms of materials, the majority of the respondents find the structure effective based on

the claim that the construction of an aerodynamically-shaped home can use readily

available materials and still maintain stability. This comprises 55% of the total population

and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the second question concerning material effectiveness, the majority of the respondents

find the structure effective based on the claim that reinforced concrete is effective in

42
 withstanding earthquakes. This comprises 60% of the total population and 12 out of 20 of

the respondents.

 In the third question concerning material effectiveness, the majority of the respondents

find the structure strongly effective based on the claim that reinforced concrete is

effective in withstanding the fire calamities. This comprises 55% of the total population

and 11 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the fourth question concerning material effectiveness, the majority of the respondents

find the structure effective based on the claim that laminated glass an effective material to

use during the high-winds and typhoons. This comprises 55% of the total population and

11 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the fifth question concerning material effectiveness, the majority of the respondents

find the structure effective based on the claim that metal Framing increases the stability

of the structure. This comprises 60% of the total population and 12 out of 20 of the

respondents.

 In terms of design, that the majority of the respondents have a neutral stand towards the

claim that the circular polygonal shape of the structure maximizes space. This comprises

50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the second question concerning design effectiveness, that the majority of the

respondents find the structure strongly effective based on the claim that an

aerodynamically shaped structure is effective in shedding wind. This comprises 65% of

the total population and 13 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the third question concerning design effectiveness, that the majority of the respondents

find the structure strongly effective based on the claim that the aerodynamic shape of a

43
 structure can help withstand the high winds of typhoons that pass through Lucena. This

comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the fourth question concerning design effectiveness, that the majority of the

respondents find the structure effective based on the claim that a modified hexagonal

gazebo type roof, makes a structure resilient to high winds and typhoons This comprises

50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the fifth question concerning design effectiveness, that the majority of the respondents

find the structure strongly effective based on the claim that the consideration of wind

factors is important in choosing the roof style of a structure. This comprises 70% of the

total population and 14 out of 20 of the respondents

 In terms of durability, that the majority of the respondents find the structure strongly

effective based on the claim that the strong foundation of the structure increases the

stability of the structure and makes it safer. This comprises 85% of the total population

and 17 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the second question concerning durability, that the majority of the respondents find the

structure strongly effective based on the claim that the design of an aerodynamically

shaped structure makes it effective in sheltering people and objects inside during natural

disasters. This comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

 In the third question concerning durability, that the majority of the respondents find the

structure strongly effective based on the claim that the design of the structure makes it

effective in withstanding calamities that commonly occur in Lucena. This comprises 50%

of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the respondents.

44
  In the fourth question concerning durability, that the majority of the respondents find the

structure strongly effective based on the claim that the integration of aerodynamics into

the architectural design of a structure is an effective way to improve the stability of a

structure.. This comprises 50% of the total population and 10 out of 20 of the

respondents.

 In the fifth question concerning durability, that an equal amount of the respondents who

found the structure strongly effective and effective based on the claim that the round

polygonal shape of the structure transfers environmental loads most efficiently providing

extra resilience and performance during critical events, especially earthquakes, make up

the majority of the population, each comprising 40% of the population and 8 out of 20

respondents.

Conclusions

Based on the findings, these conclusions were made:

An aerodynamically-shaped structure, although it may require larger budget is cost

effective, considering its ability to withstand typhoons. This may be an investment a little too

beyond the reach of people of the lower class, but it is an investment that can save lives. Aside

from this, the materials it uses are effective in withstanding typhoons because they increase the

structures stability and capacity to resist flooding and high winds. As for the structure’s design,

the aerodynamic shape of the structure makes it strongly effective in resisting typhoons and

earthquakes, because its circular heptadecagonal shape enables it to shed the high winds of

typhoons and resist various lateral loads. Because these different aspects of its construction are

considered by professionals to be effective, it can be concluded that an aerodynamically-shaped

45
structure is an all-around effective structure in withstanding typhoons and would be beneficial to

the citizens of Lucena City.

Recommendations

Based on the findings and conclusion, the following are recommended:

Given that the construction of an aerodynamically-shaped house may be heavy on the

pocket and require materials that may not always be readily available, some materials may

substituted for cheaper materials although less durable. The necessary level of durability,

however, may vary according to location.

Considering the properties of metal and its reaction with saltwater, metal framing,

although it makes for a stable home, would not be the best choice for homes in coastal locations

just a few meters from the sea. This is why it is recommended to use marine plywood framing

instead for locations close to the sea.

The use of metal roofing along with the use of eaves is also discouraged due to its

lightweight properties and the umbrella effect it creates when wind blows upward into the eaves.

This is one of the common effects of typhoons on houses in the Philippines because of its

common use of metal roofing with eaves. Concrete slabs or wood roofing, instead, is

recommended which may be inclined at a small angle to still be able to manage the flow of

rainwater.

As for future research, factors concerning location such as soil on which the structure is

to be built on must also be emphasized as this poses one of the major factors of vertical

construction.

46