Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jcy 0048
Jcy 0048
JOINT CONVENTION YOGYAKARTA 2019, HAGI – IAGI – IAFMI- IATMI (JCY 2019)
Tentrem Hotel, Yogyakarta, November 25th – 28th, 2019
The total gravity data acquired from the satellite for this
study is 88 points which mostly covered the Kendeng
Caldera area as can be seen on Figure 1. Moreover, it is
arranged in gridding with spacing for each point about
1km.
2
PROCEEDINGS
JOINT CONVENTION YOGYAKARTA 2019, HAGI – IAGI – IAFMI- IATMI (JCY 2019)
TBA Hotel, Yogyakarta, November 25th – 28th, 2019
Gravity Data
3
PROCEEDINGS
JOINT CONVENTION YOGYAKARTA 2019, HAGI – IAGI – IAFMI- IATMI (JCY 2019)
TBA Hotel, Yogyakarta, November 25th – 28th, 2019
Further study is needed to predict the geothermal is still dominated by high anomaly value represent by
prospect area due to the variative interpretation which orange to red color.
can be conclude from the gravity anomaly only. Thus,
additional data is needed to get better interpretation.
2. Regional Anomaly Based on remote sensing data analysis, the prospect zone is
Regional anomaly and residual anomaly was separate located in the center of this study area, because it has high
by using spectrum analysis using Oasis Montaj surface temperature. This area also has high gravity
software. The result of regional anomaly can be seen anomaly. The high anomaly value in the center area might
on Figure 5. The anomaly is lookalike complete be associated with ancient intrusive body owned by
bouger anomaly shown in Figure 3. The tendency of Kendeng caldera or possible heat source of geothermal
high anomaly zone extends from southwest to north system.
east direction. Considering the study location which Further study in this boundary should be done to give
located in the volcanic complex, probably the high advance identification of geothermal prospect zone at
anomaly zone related with volcanoes which might be Blawan-Ijen geothermal prospect area.
intrusive body.
Moreover, consider that regional anomaly images References
deeper anomaly at the study area, can be interpret that 1. Ardiansyah. (2015). “Pengolahan Citra
this high anomaly zone extends as it goes deeper. Penginderaan Jauh Menggunakan ENVI 5.1
Thus, to get better image of high anomaly zone dan ENVI LiDAR”. PT Labsig Inderaja Islim,
extension 2-D or 3-D modelling and upward Jakarta.
continuation should be done. 2. Amalisana, B., Pin, T. G., & Saraswati, R. (2017).
“Penentuan Potensi Panas Bumi Menggunakan
Landsat 8 dan Hubungannya dengan Kondisi
Geologi Gunung Lawu”. In Prosiding
Industrial Research Workshop and National
Seminar (Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 300-305)
3. Daud, Y., Arafat, Y., Kumara, D. A., Fortuna, D. A.,
Yunus, F. M., & Avicienna, H. F. (2018). An Updated
Study of Discovering Blawan-Ijen Geothermal Prospect
Area Using Gravity and Magnetic Methods. In E3S
Web of Conferences (Vol. 73, p. 01007). EDP
Sciences.
Figure 9. Regional Anomaly Map of Blawan-Ijen 4. P. Gaspar, F. Ogor , P. Y. Le Traon, O. Z. Zanife, 1994,
"Joint estimation of the TOPEX and Poseidon sea-state
biases," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99,
3. Residual Anomaly
1994, pp. 24981-24994
By separating the regional and residual anomaly,
5. Sujanto, S., & Sitorus, K. (1988). Geological map of
residual anomaly was conducted as can be seen on
the Ijen caldera complex, east Java. Volcanol. Surv.
Figure 6. The pattern of residual anomaly does not
Indones.
lookalike either the CBA or Regional map. As can be
6. Topex-Poseidon Partners Discuss Sequel', Space News,
seen on the picture, the residual anomaly tends to
Aug. 17-23, 1992, p. 3
show shallower anomaly which is more variative and
7. www.esdm.go.id/: Kamojang, Indonesia First’s
tend to be affected by noise. Thus, several small
Geothermal Power Plant.s
closures show there. However, the center of the map