Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PSYCHOLOGY Systematic study of tasks, duties, and responsibilities, and the knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics (KSAOs) needed to perform a job
– physical and personal traits, work experience, and education. – equal pay for equal work whatever gender, race, etc.
Psychologists: 3. Job Evaluation § Exceptioning
Walter Dill Scott – Theory of Advertising – assessment of the relative value or worth of a job to an – job evaluation reveals that two jobs, equivalent duties and
– Scott Company, a personnel consulting firm in 1919. organization to determine appropriate compensation or wages. responsibilities, receive very different rates of pay.
Hugo Munsterberg – design of work and personnel selection for jobs. 4. Performance Criteria
§ how to find the best person for best possible work. – the means of appraising worker success in performing a job.
§ how to improve motivation, performance & efficiency.
perform.
§ Relationships with other persons
products.
§ Workforce diversity § False-negative - rejecting applicants who would’ve been successful - measurement of easily quantifiable aspects of job performance
- units produced, amount of sales, time needed to process info.
Four interrelated processes:
Methods: § Subjective Performance Criteria
1. Talent Inventory – assessment of current KSAOs of current employees.
1. Employee Screening - judgments or ratings made by supervisor, co-worker, customer.
2. Workforce forecast – plan for future HR requirements.
– number of positions, skills require, etc. - evaluate the suitability of application to the job vacancy. - related concerns:
§ Criterion Contamination - elements that should not be included
3. Action plans – plan to guide recruitment, selection, training, and
2. Employment Interview
compensation of the future hires. § Criterion Deficiency - criterion falls short of measuring performance
- communication process that assess the competencies possessed § Criterion Usefulness - criterion is usable in appraising a job
4. Control and evaluation – system feedback to assess how well the HR
by an applicant in relation to job and organization.
system is working and how well the company met the HR plan.
§ Stress Interview - how applicant would respond in difficult situation. Sources - supervisor, self, co-worker, customer, 360-degree feedback
§ Behavioral Interview - applicants cite and describe how they
EMPLOYEE RECRUITMENT handled a specific experience in the past, using STAR approach. Methods of Rating Performance
– process of attracting potential worker to apply for jobs. § Comparative Methods - comparison of worker’s performance
3. Employment Testing
1. Rankings
Process: § Cognitive Ability Test – rank from best to worst on specific performance.
1. Review job description and specifications of vacant position. - Intelligence Test measure ability to think, analyze, reason, plan. 2. Paired Comparisons
2. Plan and launch a targeted sourcing strategy. - Aptitude Test measures ability to learn or develop proficiency. – simply pairing to judge who is better performer.
3. Create a list of qualified candidates. § Interest Test 3. Forced Distributions
4. Assess and select the best candidate. - measuring and relating interest to various occupational areas. – rank into categories (poor to excellent)
§ Personality Test Individual Methods - evaluating an employee by him/herself.
Methods: §
- standardized instrument designed to reveal aspects of an 1. Graphic rating scales
§ Internal Sourcing
individual’s character or psychological makeup. – likert scale system for performance evaluation.
– employee referrals and recommendations
§ Emotional Intelligence 2. Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)
– job posting – measure occurrence of each desirable behavior indicator.
- ability to understand, recognize and manage own emotions.
– human resource information system 3. Behavioral observation scales
§ Strengthsfinder
– internship program – objective and detailed descriptions of performance from
- Donald O. Clifton and Tom Rath
§ External Sourcing exceptional level to below average level.
- discover and develop natural talents and signature strengths
– advertisement 4. Checklists
that can be utilized to make positive contribution to organization.
– online job search engine, job board/site 5. Narratives
§ Projective Test – open-ended, written accounts of performance or listing of
– company website and social network - personality test designed to let a person respond to ambiguous specific examples performance strengths and weaknesses.
– professional organizations stimuli, revealing hidden emotions and internal conflicts.
– employment agencies and search firms § Job Performance Test Rater Errors
– employee leasing and outsourcing - performing physical or mental tasks and produce work samples. § Leniency Error – giving all workers very positive appraisals.
§ Assessment Centers § Harshness Error – giving all workers very low/ negative appraisals.
- detailed evaluation of applicants using combined variety of § Primacy Error – overly affected by info presented earlier.
Employee Placement assessment techniques/ tests. § Recency Error – overly affected by information present recently.
- process of deciding to which job hired workers should be assigned. - trained raters review and score each candidate’s performance. § Halo Effect – one positive behavior lead to overall impression.
- Situation Exercise: used for management-level positions. § Horn Effect – one negative trait overshadow positive traits.
Group – two or more individuals, working together toward a goal. 2. Norms – standards that groups adopt to indicate appropriate behavior. Group Decision-Making
§ Formal group – designated work group directed toward organizational goal. § Performance norms - level of effort, of output, of appropriate tardiness. Processes
§ Informal group – a group appears in response to need for social contact. § Appearance norms - dress codes, unspoken rules on when to look busy. 1. Autocratic– group leader makes decisions alone.
§ Social Arrangement norms - whether to form friendship on & off the job. 2. Democratic – members discuss the decision and vote on course of action.
Sub classifications of groups: § Resource Allocation norms - assignment of jobs, distribution of resources. 3. Consensus – all members have agreed on the chosen course of action.
§ Command group – individuals who report directly to a given manager.
§ Task group – people working together to complete a job task 3. Status – a socially defined position or rank given to groups or members Effectiveness
§ Interest group – working together to attain a goal which each is concerned. § Status Characteristic Theory 1. Offers increased knowledge & experience on which to base the decision
§ Friendship group – brought together because of common characteristics - differences in status characteristics create status hierarchies within groups. 2. It tends to lead to increased member satisfaction and greater member
- three sources: commitment to the course of action than individual decision making.
Perspectives: o Power a person wields over others. 3. Increase in electronic decision-making meetings.
o Ability to contribute to a group’s goals
§ Social Identity Theory – why individuals consider self as members of groups. Techniques
o Personal characteristics
§ In-group Favoritism – we see members of our in-group as better than others § Interacting groups – members interact face to face.
4. Basic Group Process
Stages of Group Development § Brainstorming – idea-generation process that encourage all alternatives.
§ Conformity - adjustment of one’s behavior to align with norms. § Nominal Group Technique – members meet face to face to pool judgments
1. Forming stage – characterized by uncertainty o Reference groups - group where individuals belong or hope to belong.
2. Storming stage – intragroup conflict
§ Electronic Meeting – interact on computer for anonymity of comments
o Deviant workplace behavior - antisocial behavior that violates norms.
3. Norming stage – close relationships and cohesiveness Group Decision Making Gone Awry
§ Cohesiveness – attraction among members that hold groups together.
4. Performing stage – group is fully functional 1. Groupthink
5. Adjourning stage – wrapping up activities § Efficacy – shared beliefs in their ability to produce a desired outcome.
– syndrome characterized by tendency to reduce effectiveness of a
§ Cooperation – mutual assistance in working toward a goal. cohesive group’s ability to make high quality critical decision.
Group Properties o Reciprocity rule – workers help others so others will help them too. Eight Symptoms
1. Roles – expected behavior about functions of a position in a social unit. o Task Interdependence – performance depends on efforts of others. 1. Illusion of vulnerability – members see themselves as powerful & invincible.
§ Role Perception – view of how he/she is supposed to act. o Social Loafing - less effort when working collectively than individually. 2. Illusion of morality – members see themselves as good guys & others as bad.
§ Role Expectations – responsibilities and requirements of the role. 3. Shared negative stereotypes – members belittle any opposing viewpoints.
§ Competition – working against one another to achieve individual goals.
§ Role Differentiation – members learn and take on various define roles. 4. Collective rationalizations – members explain away any negative information
§ Role Ambiguity – sense of uncertainty over requirements of a role. 5. Self-censorship – members suppress own doubts & criticisms on decisions
§ Role Conflict – individual is confronted by divergent role expectations.
Conflict – competitiveness of workers that become exposed.
6. Illusion of unanimity – decision is consensus; silence indicates support.
– the conflicting parties have incompatible goals. 7. Direct conformity pressure – opposing view or doubt is expressed.
Various Roles Individuals Play in Work Groups:
Levels of Conflict 8. Mindguards – play role of protecting or insulting group from opposing opinions
o Group Tasks Roles
§ Initiator-contributor – recommend new ideas or solutions to problem. 1. Internalconflict – one person is faced with two set of incompatible goals 2. Group Polarization
§ Information/ Opinion seeker – getting facts/ feelings about ideas. 2. Interindividual conflict –
the conflict between two people. – tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than
§ Information/ Opinion giver – provide information/ own opinions & feelings.
3. Intragroup conflict – between one person and other group members. those made by individuals.
§ Elaborator – clarify and expands points made by others.
4. Intergroup conflict – two groups are in conflict of each other.
§ Coordinator – integrates information from the group.
§ Orientor – guides the discussion. Sources of Conflict Team – interdependent workers with complementary skills working toward a goal.
§ Evaluator-critic – use standards to evaluate group’s accomplishments. § Work Group – interacts to share info and make decisions to help each other.
1. Organizational structure – status differences, simple disagreements.
§ Energizer – stimulates the group to take action.
2. Scarcity of Important Resources – money, materials, tools, supplies. § Team Group – group efforts result in greater performance > individual
§ Procedural technician – handles routine tasks such as providing materials.
§ Recorder – keeps track of group’s activities and takes minutes or notes. 3. Interdependence – members rely on each other to get jobs done. Guidelines for Effective Functioning of Work Teams
o Group Building and Maintenance Roles 4. We-they feeling – having a common enemy within own organization. 1. The task is one that is appropriate for a work team.
§ Encourager – encourage other’s contributions. 5. Interpersonal – certain individuals do not get along with each other. 2. The team is recognized by its own members and others in the organization.
§ Harmonizer – resolve conflict between members. 3. The team has clear authority over the task.
§ Compromiser – provide conflicting members with mutually agreeable solution. Conflict Outcomes 4. The structure of the team, tasks, members, and the norms, need to promote
§ Gatekeeper – regulates the flow of communication so all members have a say. 1. Increase motivation and energy level of group members teamwork.
§ Standard setter – sets standards or deadlines for group actions.
2. Stimulate creativity and innovation 5. The organization must support the team through policies and systems designed to
§ Group observer – makes objective observations about group interaction.
3. Improve the quality ofdecisions. support the work team’s needs.
§ Follower – accepts the ideas of others and goes along with group majority.
o Self-Centered Roles 4. Group processes tend to be more satisfied than those with no influence. 6. Expert coaching and feedback are provided to the teams when it is needed and
§ Aggressor –promote own status within group by attacking others. 5. Reduction of group cohesiveness when team members are ready to receive it.
§ Blocker –block all group actions and refuses to go along with group. 6. Hamper effective group performance when it retards communication Types of Teams
§ Recognition seeker –play up own achievements to get group’s attention.
§ Self-confessor – uses group discussion to deal with personal issues. Managing Conflict § Problem Solving teams – 5-12 people discuss ways of improving quality, efficient
§ Playboy – engages in humor & irrelevant acts to draw attention away from tasks. and work environment.
1. Dominating – win-lose strategy; one party wins, the other loses.
§ Dominator – control or monopolize the group. § Self-Managed Work teams – 10-15 people take responsibilities of supervisors.
2. Accommodation – lose-win strategy; self-sacrifice to resolve the conflict.
§ Help seeker – gain sympathy by expressing insecurity or inadequacy. § Cross-Functional trams – same hierarchical level but different work areas to
§ Special interest pleader – argues incessantly to further own desires. 3. Compromise – lose-lose strategy; each party must give up something.
accomplish a task.
4. Collaboration – win-win situation; parties cooperate for beneficial solution.
§ Virtual teams – use computer technology to tie together physically dispersed
5. Avoidance – suppressing the conflict.
members to achieve common goal.
2. Path-Goal Theory
– leader’s job is to help work group attain the goals they desire.
§ Directive – provides instructions and suggestions for getting the job done.
§ Achievement-oriented – focus on work outcomes & setting challenging goals
§ Supportive – concentrate on interpersonal relations by showing concern.
§ Participative – encourages members in planning and decision making.
3. SituationalLeadership Model
– there is no single best style of leadership.
§ Leadership style – how leaders behave in influencing people’s performance.
BEHAVIOR:
o Directive Behavior – clearly telling what, how, where, when to act.
o Supportive Behavior – listen and encourage involvement in discussion.
STYLES:
o Directing – high in directive, low in supportive behavior
o Coaching – high D, high S
o Supporting – low D, high S
o Delegating – low D, low S