Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.clearlake.ca.us
REGULAR MEETING OF
CLEARLAKE CITY COUNCIL
& REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
CLEARLAKE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
14050 OLYMPIC DRIVE
CLEARLAKE, CA 95422
ROLL CALL:
_____ Mayor Russ Cremer
_____ Vice Mayor Dirk Slooten
_____ Councilmember Phil Harris
_____ Councilmember Joyce Overton
_____ Councilmember Russell Perdock
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE: The City Council invites members of the clergy, as well as
interested members of the public in the City of Clearlake, to voluntarily offer an invocation before the
beginning of its meetings for the benefit and blessing of the City Council. This opportunity is voluntary,
and invocations are to be less than three minutes, offered in a solemn and respectful tone, and directed
at the City Council. Invocational speakers who do not abide by these simple rules of respect and brevity
shall be given a warning and/or not invited back to provide a subsequent invocation for a reasonable
period of time, as determined appropriate by the City. This policy is not intended and shall not be
implemented or construed in any way, to affiliate the City Council with, nor express the City Council's
preference for, any faith or religious denomination. Rather, this policy is intended to acknowledge and
express the City Council's respect for the diversity of religious denominations and faiths represented and
practiced among the citizens of Clearlake. If a scheduled invocational speaker does not appear at the
scheduled meeting, the Mayor will ask that the City Council observe a moment of silence in lieu of the
invocation. More information about the City’s invocation policy is available upon request by contacting
the City Clerk at (707) 994-8201x106 or via email at mswanson@clearlake.ca.us.
MEETING PROCEDURES:
All items on the agenda will be open for public comment before final action is taken.
Citizens wishing to introduce written material into the record at the public meeting on
Page 1 of 4
any item are requested to provide a copy of the written material to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting date so that the material may be distributed to the City Council prior to
the meeting. Speakers must restrict comments to the item as it appears on the agenda
and stay within a three-minute time limit. The Mayor has the discretion of limiting the
total discussion time for an item. As a courtesy to others, please turn off cell phones and
any other distracting devices.
PUBLIC COMMENT: This is the time for any member of the public to address the City Council on any
matter not on the agenda that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the city. Please complete a
“Speaker Information Card” and present it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. The Brown
Act, with limited exceptions, does not allow the Council or staff to discuss issues brought forth under
Public Comment. The Council cannot take action on non-agenda items. Concerns may be referred to staff
or placed on the next available agenda. Please note that comments from the public will also be taken on
each agenda item. Comments shall be limited to three minutes per person.
CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature
and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member
of the Council or audience requests otherwise, or if staff has requested a change under Adoption of the
Agenda, in which case the item will be removed for separate consideration. Any item so removed will be
taken up following the motion to approve the Consent Agenda.
Page 2 of 4
PUBLIC HEARING:
Notice to the Public
The City Council, when considering the matter scheduled for hearing, will take the following actions:
1. Open the Public Hearing
2. Presentations by Staff
3. Presentation by Applicant or Appellant (if applicable)
4. Accept Public Testimony
5. Applicant or Appellant Rebuttal Period (if applicable)
6. Close the Public Hearing
7. Council Comments and Questions
8. Council Action
Once the hearing is closed, no further public comment will be taken. If you wish to challenge in court
any of the matters on this agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to
raising only those issues, which you, or someone else, raised orally at the public hearing or in written
correspondence received by the city at or before the public hearing.
Public hearings listed for continuance will be continued as noted and posting of this agenda serves as
notice of continuance. Any matter not noted for continuance will be posted separately.
BUSINESS:
9. First Reading of Ordinance 236-2020 to Clarify and Correct Ordinance No. 222-2019 Related to the
Issuance, Handling, Appeals and Penalties of Administrative Citations
Recommended Action: Hold First Reading of Ordinance No. 236-2020:, AN ORDINANCE
CLARIFYING AND CORRECTING ORDINANCE NO. 222-2019 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS
1, 10 AND 18 OF THE CLEARLAKE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE, HANDLING,
APPEALS AND PENALTIES OF ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS; AMENDING THE GENERAL PENALTY
FOR VIOLATIONS; ADJUSTING PENALTIES FOR CANNABIS RELATED VIOLATIONS AND PROVIDING
FOR IMMEDIATE IMPOSITION OF FINES IN SPECIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES, read by title only and set
second reading for the February 6, 2020 meeting
10. Receive Update on the Hope Center Project and Provide Direction on City Funding Support
Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff
Page 3 of 4
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA) REQUESTS
If you need disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to
participate in this meeting, please contact Melissa Swanson, City Clerk, at the Clearlake City Hall, 14050
Olympic Drive, Clearlake, California 95422, phone (707) 994-8201, ext. 106, or via email at
mswanson@clearlake.ca.us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, to allow time to provide for special
accommodations.
AGENDA REPORTS
Staff reports for each agenda item are available for review at City Hall located at 14050 Olympic Drive
during normal business hours and on the City’s website at www.clearlake.ca.us. Members of the public
are invited to come and comment on any item under discussion.
Any writings or documents pertaining to an open session item provided to a majority of the City Council
less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, shall be made available for public inspection at the front counter
at City Hall located at 14050 Olympic Drive during normal business hours.
Page 4 of 4
Item 2
CITY OF CLEARLAKE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: January 23, 2020
Effective September 2018, a new law (AB 1912) established rules for Joint Power Authorities
(JPA) to meet pension obligations for employees and retirees should the JPA terminate its
retirement plan or dissolve. Prior to this law, JPAs could dissolve without members assuming
the retirement liabilities of its employees and retirees, putting their pensions in serious
question. This new law requires that member agencies of a JPA, prior to filing a notice of
termination of CalPERS participation, must mutually agree with the public retirement system on
how to apportion the retirement liability of the JPA so that the apportionment equals 100% of
this liability. If the member agencies are unable to mutually agree to the apportionment
formula, CalPERS’s Board would apportion the retirement liability and would establish
procedures allowing a member agency to challenge the Board’s determination through the
arbitration process.
As your Council is aware, the City is a member of Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of
California (PARSAC), a JPA made of cities and special districts who pool for self-insurance for
general liability and worker’s compensation, etc. PARSAC is a CalPERS agency and employees
receive retirement benefits through this plan. In May 2019, the PARSAC Board approved a plan
for liquidating its assets to meet any retirement liabilities should PARSAC dissolve. Agencies
who are members at the time of the liquidation would receive a credit toward those liabilities
based on their pro rata share of historical general liability and worker’s comp contributions.
In December, the PARSAC Board approved the attached “Agreement for Apportionment of
Retirement Obligations.” Your Council has granted your Board Director, Administrative Services
Director/City Clerk Swanson to execute all matters relating to PARSAC and your Council’s
1
approval is not required. However, staff is informing your Council of this development and new
law for your information.
PARSAC is not intending to dissolve or terminate its retirement plan with CalPERS. This item
has come forward due to the adoption of AB 1912.
There is potential for the City to be responsible for costs related to pension obligations should
PARSAC dissolve in the future. However, at this time, there is no plan to dissolve or terminate.
2
PARSAC
AGREEMENT FOR APPORTIONMENT OF
RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
1
PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA [PARSAC]
THIS AGREEMENT is made in the State of California by and among those municipalities
organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "Member
Entity[ies]," which are parties’ signatory to the Joint Powers Authority Agreement (as revised
effective May 25, 2017, hereafter “JPA Agreement. All such Member Entities are listed in
RECITALS
Whereas PARSAC is an entity formed under California Government Code § 6500 which
permits two or more public agencies by agreement to jointly exercise any power common to the
contracting parties.
Whereas California Government Code § 6508.2 requires that the member agencies of a joint
retirement liability prior to either a dissolution of the AGENCY or the termination of the
Now, therefore, in consideration of the above facts and the mutual benefits, promises and
agreements set forth below, the Member Entities hereby agree as follow:
AGREEMENT
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
A. “Agreement” shall mean this Revised and Restated Joint Powers Agreement creating the
2
B. “Board” or “Board of Directors” shall mean the governing body of PARSAC.
C. “PARSAC” shall mean the Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California created
by this Agreement.
D. “Deposit Premium” shall mean the estimated amount determined for each Member Entity
necessary to fund each layer of coverage for each Policy Year of each Program of PARSAC.
E. “Member Entity” shall mean any California public entity which is a party signatory to this
Agreement including any other agency for which the City Council sits as the Governing board.
F. “Program Year” shall mean a period of time, usually 12 months, for which each Program
Adjustments.
G. “Program” shall mean arrangements to cover specific types of claims which may include,
but not be limited to, property, workers' compensation, and comprehensive liability claims.
H. “Public Entity” shall mean a county, city, whether general law or chartered, city and county,
town, district, political subdivision, joint powers authority, or any board, commission, or agency
I. “Public Retirement System” shall mean CalPERS or any other Public Entity retirement
J. “Retirement Liability” shall mean the liability that PARSAC possesses to all former or
current employees of PARSAC for retirement benefits owed to them pursuant to a contract between
PARSAC and a Public Retirement System and arising by reason of those employees participation in
3
K. “Retrospective Premium” shall mean, the amount determined retrospectively as each
Member Entity's share of losses, reserves, expenses and interest income as may be determined
adjust the Deposit Premium, or prior Retrospective Premiums if any, to the newly calculated
Each Member Entity is a party to this Agreement and agrees that it intends to, and does
contract with, all other parties who are signatories of this Agreement and with such other parties
as may later be added. Each Member Entity also agrees that the expulsion or withdrawal of any
Member Entity from this Agreement shall not affect this Agreement nor the remaining parties as
ARTICLE III
PURPOSE
A. Provide for an apportionment among current and former PARSAC Member Entities
of 100% of PARSAC’s Retirement Liability consistent with the requirements of Government Code
§§ 6508.1 and 6508.2 as enacted and amended effective January 1, 2019. The current Member
Entities of PARSAC are set forth in Appendix A. The former Member Entities of PARSAC as of
4
ARTICLE IV
A. In the event of a decision by the governing Board of PARSAC to dissolve and cease
all operations, or in the event of a decision by the governing Board of PARSAC to terminate
PARSAC’s contract with a Public Retirement System, the Member Entities agree that 100% of
PARSAC’s Retirement Liability shall be funded by all current and former PARSAC Member
Entities based on a pro rata share of the former and current Member Entities’ historical Deposit
Premium in the Workers’ Compensation and Liability self-funded Programs. The apportionment
of the Retirement Liability shall be calculated as set forth above, and the unfunded Retirement
Liability then existing shall be paid as follows: The unfunded Retirement Liability then existing
shall be paid prior to any distribution of assets as provided in ARTICLE XXV of the JPA
Agreement and prior to the payment of any equity that may be determined as the result of the
Retrospective Premium Adjustment process as set forth in ARTICLE XX. (For example, should a
Member Entity have remaining equity in either the Workers’ Compensation or Liability program,
public retirement system, the Member Entity’s equity shall first be applied to reduce that Member
B. In the event that PARSAC disposes of the real property identified as 1525 Response
Road, Sacramento, CA, 95815 (the “Property”), any unfunded Retirement Liability of PARSAC
shall first be reduced by applying the proceeds from the sale of the Property as provided in
Resolution 2019-03, attached hereto as Exhibit A, prior to the determination of the amounts owed
by the former or current Member Entities under the apportionment provided herein.
5
C. The apportionment of the Retirement Liability of PARSAC among the former and
current Member Entities of PARSAC and the obligation of the former and current Member Entities
to pay such apportionment of the PARSAC Retirement Liability as provided herein shall be a
separate and independent obligation from the obligation of the Member Entities arising upon
termination, expulsion or withdrawal of a Member Entity or upon termination of the Joint Powers
Agreement (as revised effective May 25, 2017) including but not limited to ARTICLES XX, XXII,
ARTICLE V
TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full
force and effect for the purpose of paying 100% of the Retirement Liability of PARSAC pursuant
to the apportionment among former and current Member Entities as provided for herein.
ARTICLE VI
SEVERABILITY
Should any portion, term, condition or provision of this Agreement be decided by a court
of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or be
otherwise rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining portions, terms,
ARTICLE VII
AGREEMENT COMPLETE
The foregoing constitutes the full and complete agreement of the parties. There are no oral
understandings or agreements not set forth in writing herein, except as noted with respect to the
Bylaws and Memoranda of Coverage. If any provision of this Agreement conflicts with a provision
6
of the Bylaws, Memoranda of Coverage or other document, such conflicting provisions shall be
interpreted to avoid any such conflict, but this Agreement shall govern.
ARTICLE VIII
AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be amended by a two-thirds vote of the Board present and voting at
any duly convened regular or special meeting; provided that, any such amendment has been
submitted to the directors and the Member Entities at least thirty [30] days in advance of such
meeting. Member Entities may, by resolution or ordinance, grant their director and alternate on the
Board explicit authorization to approve and execute amendments to this Agreement on behalf of
the Member Entity without the necessity of a resolution or ordinance of the legislative body of the
Member Entity confirming or ratifying such amendment. Any such amendment shall become
ARTICLE IX
EXECUTION OF COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so
executed shall be deemed to be an original, but altogether shall constitute one and the same
Agreement.
7
Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California [“PARSAC’]
Name/Title
Attest: ______________________________
Name/Title
Attest: ______________________________
City/Town Clerk
8
APPENDIX “A”
MEMBER ENTITIES
9
APPENDIX “B”
City of Alturas
City of Canyon Lake
City of Carlsbad
City of Elk Grove
City of Hesperia
City of Rialto
City of Ridgecrest
City of Rio Dell
City of West Hollywood
10
CITY OF CLEARLAKE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: January 23, 2020
On January 9th, Council held the first reading of Ordinance No. 235-2020. Staff is recommending
the Council hold the second reading of the ordinance by title only and adopt of the ordinance.
Electronically operated vehicle gates and barriers are used to provide security to multi-unit
residential buildings and areas and commercial buildings and areas. However, gates and barriers
can hinder and delay first responders when responding to calls for service. A delay in response
to threats to public health, safety and welfare can result in injury or death to persons and damage
or destruction of real and personal property.
Certain systems exist to allow prompt access to the areas closed with gates by using radio
equipment already in use by emergency vehicles and personnel. This prevents maintaining an
inventory of different remotes, access codes and keys to open electronic access gates. The
systems are capable of being accessed by surrounding public safety agencies who may respond
to calls in the city limits in the case of mutual aid type calls. In such circumstances, without the
systems required by this proposed ordinance, public safety resources would have to wait for
someone with access to the gate to come and open it, creating a delay in response.
The City Council adopted an ordinance in February 2019 requiring gates to multi-unit residential
buildings and areas to be constructed and maintained in accordance with plans approved by the
City that incorporate the electronic systems allowing rapid access by first responders. Following
a suggestion during public comment, the City Council requested staff return with an ordinance
to extend the ordinance to cover commercial properties. The proposed ordinance incorporates
1
commercial properties and provides one year for existing gates to come into compliance. The
cost to retrofit an existing gate is approximately $1500.
The proposed action would support achieving the Council adopted goal: Update Policies &
Procedures to Current Government Standards, Objective #3: Update Ordinances.
2
ORDINANCE NO. 235-2020
WHEREAS, electronically operated gates and barriers are used to provide security to residential
and commercial areas by restricting the passage of vehicles on private access roads; and
WHEREAS, emergency vehicles and personnel have difficulty promptly entering residential and
commercial areas where electronic gates or barriers are installed; and
WHEREAS, a delay in response to threats to public health, safety and welfare can result in injury
or death to persons and damage or destruction of real and personal property; and
WHEREAS, certain systems exist to allow prompt access to areas closed with gates by using radio
equipment already in use by emergency vehicles and personnel;
The City Council of the City of Clearlake, State of California does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
The above recitals are declared to be true and correct findings of the City Council of the City of
Clearlake; and
SECTION 2.
Chapter 1, Section 9-1, Subsection 9-1.16 of the Clearlake Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
No plans shall be approved unless the plans allow emergency vehicles and emergency personnel
to open such electronically secured gate by city approved radio equipment used by emergency
vehicles or personnel.
On or before January 1, 2020, all existing electronically or electrically secured gates that impede
access to a multi-unit residential structure or multi-unit residential area shall either be (a)
removed, or (b) retrofitted and maintained in accordance with plans approved by the city to
comply with paragraph b.
On or before January 1, 2021, all existing electronically or electrically secured gates that impede
access to a commercial structure or commercial area shall either be (a) removed, or (b) retrofitted
and maintained in accordance with plans approved by the city to comply with paragraph b.
”
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held
invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or
circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
SECTION 4. EXECUTION.
The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper within 15 days after its
adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days from its adoption.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_________________________
Mayor, City of Clearlake
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk, City of Clearlake
CITY OF CLEARLAKE
The Public Works Department has eight (8) pieces of worn out and broken-down vehicles and
equipment that are no longer used. The vehicles and equipment have numerous mechanical
failures and/or safety issues and are not feasible to repair.
The Clearlake Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to declare obsolete equipment as
surplus and further direct the disposal of said property. Given the issues with these vehicles,
including safety issues, it is impractical and not recommended to try and sell the vehicles to the
public.
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the proposed resolution and authorize the Public
Works Director to take necessary steps to dispose of the vehicles.
None
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-05
WHEREAS, the PW Department owns multiple vehicles and equipment, identified in “Exhibit A”,
that are no longer used due to mechanical issues and component failures that make the
vehicles inoperable, unsafe to operate or economically infeasible to repair; and
WHEREAS, Clearlake Municipal Code Section 3-4.10 permits the disposal of obsolete or worn
out equipment and to dispose of said equipment.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Clearlake hereby
declares the vehicles listed in “Exhibit A” as surplus and authorizes the Director of Public Works
to take necessary steps to dispose of the vehicles.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Clearlake, County of Lake, State of
California, on this 23rd day of January 2020, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:______________________________ ________________________________
City Clerk Mayor
EXHIBIT A
Subject: Approve the Submittal of the ROPS FY 20-21 for Date: January 6, 2020
both periods A (July to December) and B (January
to June) to the Oversight Board
Reviewed & Approved:
A single annual ROPS for both the A and B periods in FY 20-21 is due to be submitted by February
1, 2020 for the July to December 2020 and January to June 30, 2021 periods. The ROPS are used
to authorize expenditures and allocate Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF)
payments to the Successor Agencies in each six-month period of the fiscal year.
The Lake County Auditor-Controller is responsible for the administration of the RPTTF pursuant
to State law.
The RPTTF revenues are generated from former Redevelopment Agency tax increment allocation
formula and based on changes in the annual assessed valuations. With the current revenue the
Agency has some flexibility in meeting its obligations, but any decline in revenue of the City’s
property tax allocation will reduce the funds available for allocation to the Successor Agency. This
would create challenges for the Successor Agency in meeting the financial obligations of debt
service, disposal of properties and increase the administrative burden to the City for the
dissolution process. Preliminary projections for the fiscal year 20-2021 tax roll are for a small
increase in revenue.
Below is a summary of the RPTTF related to ROPS 20-21 separated by the A and B periods due to
the continued method of calculating and distributing the RPTTF. This information is from various
reports issued by the Lake County Auditor Controller and projections from ROPS.
Attached are the ROPS 20-21 schedules. The Oversight Board is scheduled to meet to consider
the ROPS from Clearlake, Lakeport, and the County on January 29, 2020
FINANCIAL AND/OR POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The implementation of the ROPS is part of the
Successor Agency annual budget.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution SA-2020-01 Approving ROPS 20-21
2. Exhibit A - ROPS 20-21 Schedules
CLEARLAKE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2012, the Clearlake City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-
02 electing to become the Successor Agency to the Clearlake Redevelopment Agency
(“Successor Agency”) pursuant to AB 1X 26 (The Redevelopment Agency Dissolution Act), and
pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34173(g), the Successor Agency is now a separate
legal entity from the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177 (o)(1), beginning July 1,
2020, the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall be for both six-month periods
covering the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency must prepare and approve a draft ROPS, including the
estimated amounts for administrative costs, for the two six-month fiscal periods comprising the
fiscal year and proposed sources of payment for those costs, and submit it for approval by the
Oversight Board established to review Successor Agency actions; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34181 (a), the Oversight Board is
required to approve the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), subject to the
subsequent approval of a final ROPS by the State Department of Finance; and
1. The Successor Agency hereby approves the ROPS 20-21 for the period July 1, 2020
through June 30, 2021.
2. The Successor Agency directs the staff to submit the ROPS 20-21 to the Oversight Board
for review and approval.
3. The staff shall also submit the approved and signed ROPS 20-21 to the State Department
of Finance, County of Lake Auditor-Controller and State Controller’s Office and is further
authorized to take all such actions as are necessary to secure final approval of the ROPS
20-21.
ADOPTED THIS 23rd day of January, 2020 by the Successor Agency by the following
vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
__________________________________
_______________________________________
Melissa Swanson
City Clerk/Clerk of the Successor Agency
CITY OF CLEARLAKE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: January 23, 2020
On February 28th, 2019, your Council adopted an ordinance governing administrative penalties
for general violations and cannabis-related violations. While codifying the ordinance, a minor
typo was discovered in Section 1-9.7(e)(1)(b), which contained a reference to a subsection
which does not exist. To correct this typo, it is necessary to adopt a new ordinance stating the
correct subsection “1-9.6.”
The changes proposed make no changes in the text or intent of the ordinance. It is simply to
correct the error for codification of the Municipal Code.
1
ORDINANCE NO. 236-2019
The City Council of the City of Clearlake, State of California does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 3: CONFLICTS:
The effective date of this Ordinance is thirty (30) days after its adoption by the City Council.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ___________, 2020 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mayor, City of Clearlake
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk, City of Clearlake
CITY OF CLEARLAKE
Subject: Receive Update on the Hope Center Project and Date: January 17, 2020
Provide Direction on City Funding Support
Since that time the team involved has been finalizing building plans and working to identify
adequate funding to initiate the project. While some funding is available, there is still a significant
shortfall. The City has issued the demolition permit and building permits necessary to start the
project. Additionally, the Hope Rising team has made a request to the City to provide some
funding in support of the project.
The Council should receive an update on the project as well as other funding available and
provide direction to staff on what City funding is to be made available in support of the Hope
Center.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Provide Direction to Staff