You are on page 1of 1

Pines City Colleges

COLLEGE OF NURSING
Magsaysay Rd., Baguio City, Philippines
MICROBIOLOGY AND PARASITOLOGY LABORATORY
ACTIVITY 2: CASE REPORTING ON CLINICALLY IMPORTANT MICROBIAL AGENTS

Name of Student: ___________________________ Group No: ________ Case and Item Reported: _____________________

Note: While this is a group output, students will be rated individually according to the part assigned to him/her. Each student is given 8-10 minutes to
report the assigned item assigned to him/her. Please print a colored copy of your PPT per group and place a coverage.
Reporting Rubric:
CRITERIA Excellent Average Below Average Poor
15-20 8-14 1-7 0
 Student shows in-depth understanding  Student shows good understanding about the  Student shows shallow understanding The student was
about the report and is able to answer report and is able to answer questions that about the report and is able to answer absent during the
correlation/corroboration questions relate to Higher-Order Questions (How and questions Lower-Order Questions reporting.
KNOWLEDGE related to the topic. Why) within the scope of the report. (What) within the scope of the report.
AND CONTENT  All the essential parts are discussed  Some (about 20%) of the essential ideas are  Many (>30%) of the Essential Parts
and/or are found in the PPT. missing. are missing in the report.
 Report was 71-100% accurate.  Report was 51-70% Accurate.  Report has >50% error in the report.
 Reporter did not rely on his notes/PPT.  Reporter relied to his/her notes/PPT in minimal  Reporter relied heavily on his
degree. notes/PPT.
9-12 5-8 1-4 0
 Student has an excellent manner and  Student has some degrees of audience  Student is disengaged from the The student was
method of reporting engaging the class disengagement during the report, however, audience majority of the time. absent during the
PRESENTATION
from the beginning to the end of the <20% of the time allotted for reporting.  Reporter has considerable grammar reporting
AND DELIVERY
reporting.  Reporter has some grammar errors that errors rendering the entire report
 Reporter has Few to No Grammar render some parts of the report difficult to understand.
Error/s during the report of in the PPT. incomprehensible.  The student’s presentation is entirely
 The student’s presentation was clear.  The student’s presentation has few vague vague/
parts.
8-10 4-7 1-3 0
 The student has significantly contributed  The student contributed some parts that  The student contributed minorly in the No Contribution
PEER
to the accomplishment of the Task. allowed the accomplishments of the task accomplishments of the task at all
EVALUATION
 The student accomplished his assigned  The student accomplished his assigned part  The student accomplished his
part before the set deadline. on time. assigned part late.
6-8 3-5 1-3 0
MECHANICS  All Instructions were followed.  1-2 of the instructions were violated.  >3 of the instructions were violated. All instructions
were not followed

COMMENTS: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.

You might also like