An Analysis of The Sacks Sentence Completion Test As An Instrumen PDF

Louisiana State University
LSU Digital Commons

LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School
1955
An Analysis of the Sacks Sentence Completion Test

as an Instrument for Teacher Selection.
Lyman Louis Jones
Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses

Part of the Education Commons
Recommended Citation
Jones, Lyman Louis, "An Analysis of the Sacks Sentence Completion Test as an Instrument for Teacher Selection." (1955). LSU
Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8141.
https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8141
This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in
LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
gradetd@lsu.edu.
m AHAM3IS OF THE SACKS SSOTEStCE CCKKSTim TEST
AS AH IH ST Sm nr f o r te a c h e r s s ls c tio k
A DAooortation
Submitted to tha Graduate Faculty o f the

lodiriMW Stato Ottivorsity atid
A g tM U u n l and MeKtadcal College
in p a rtia l ftO fillinent o f the
ro<jLdwsBmts for the degree o f
DoctorAIM o
JfcjVHfedS
c im »i JlkM
w JkvWMMi
>pny
in
Tt» Department o f B&matien
»---
py
l&mm JUmt® Jones
B# S«# L ouisiana S ta te U n iv ersity , 1931
H« A*, L ouisiana S ta te U n iv ersity , 193&
A ugust, 1954
UMI Number: DP69519
All rights reserved
INFORM ATION TO ALL USERS

The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete m anuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
UMI
D issertation P u blishin g
UMI DP69519
Published by ProQ uest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
M icroform Edition © ProQ uest LLC.
All rights reserved. This work is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
ProQuest
Qm
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346
MANUSCRIPT THESES
Unpublished th e s e s subm itted f o r th e m aster’s and d o c to r ’s
degrees and d e p o site d in the L ouisiana S ta te U n iv e r sity Library
are a v a ila b le f o r in sp e ctio n * Use o f any t h e s is i s lim ite d by the
r ig h t s o f the author* B ib lio g r a p h ic a l r e fe r e n c e s may be n oted , but
p assages may n ot be co p ied u n less the author has g iv en perm ission*
C red it must be g iv e n in subsequent w r itte n or p u b lish ed work*
A lib r a r y w hich borrows t h i s t h e s is fo r use by i t s c l i e n t e l e
i s ex p ected t o make su re th a t th e borrower i s aware o f the above
r e s t r ic t io n s *
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
119-a
The w riter wishes be express h is appreciation to lir* George
H* Deer, outer ite m direction th is saarmscripk was prepared, for hia
Many helpful suggestions, guidance, and mcourageaasnb# He wishes to
express M# Sirp ^ oiatien to the directors o f stw te& êachlng at the
Louisiana teeeher^raining in stitu tio n s for indiapenaibXe help in
co llectin g the m aterial to be oaed in the research* To Alfred A*
Knopf, Inc. indebtedness im acknowledged for pens&ssioa to use the
Seeks Sentence Completion Teat* To h ie w ife, Catharine Jones, for
valuable assistance in tabulating m terd al, typing the manuscript,
and u n failin g encouragement, the w riter expresses h is appreciation.
49&2S7
tm m or a m rn m
m m wm
i* xracrasnm i
tlHi problem • * , * * * . . 1
Si&ttt&esit o f t&w problem *•*****„,*„*.* 1
B ttliia ita tia n o f th o problom « « * * * * * * « « # 2
l^ K ^ a z m of tho o tu d r * « * * » * . « * * * » * * 3
D e fiiiltio n o f toaso# w&& * « * • • • * # « • * » # ?
thftocy of projoofcivs. i»yîoXa^r * * * # * * * * * ?
P rojooti?® to o t * * * « * » « # » « * « 4 * » » # i
3®tS&09UM| t® 0 & • * * * * * « # « # # « 3
Soo&oao® ^co fc a * # * * * * * # 3
A&tituil® • *••••»*««*»»*#*#<»** 10
Sow m ljr dio&arfcod • «* * * » # * « * # » » • * 10
KUdOy diaturbod * . , , »* * * * * * * ** * . 10
Woll adjusted » * » « » • * * * # « # * * * * « # 10
3iudont^t®&®hing grado * * * * * « * »■ • * * « # 10
?eteiMm& r a t i o * « * • * * * « « « • « + #*» 10
Soizrooa o f d a ta • *« + » • ♦ * # * # * * # • # » # 10
Gosw&l iswthad of procedure #*• «**»*#«#« IX
n* softrgr op mjcsm> mBEATtm «*»•*«*'*»»* 14
i n, m sjeacm m m m zm jpm uoss m am
sacks &mmc& cm nm xm tm t m m m m
sm m t^m xim m ****• *******, . *, * sq
EoiiahXltfcar o f oooring * * * * » « • » » # . « « 2&

Air
CHAFTER
aaOAtAonahlp W tw m etudant-teaching
f ir o w m u i tmm*. * t * * .* » * * a * * * # « # * $ «y
ra tio
and sty d o n i-t ôM sig ********** 31
A ttitu d e toward eolloaguee and sox **»*.»,* 33
A ttitude toward ealleagtjtaa and grad*
In stu teifc-teaah ln g *«.«** * * * * * « « » « 37
A ttitude t o w d m a a b ilitie s ********** A3
A ttitude toward th e p ast .#»•#•**««*«.« . 4$
A ttitud e toward t-Ho fu tu re «***«*#**• » 53
A ttitude tsw w d T tars «-•****««#*»*•» 50
A ttitude toward guSlt~£eeIAngs * * * * «*. , »■ * 60
A ttitude toward goal® * , * « ***, *** # « » * 64
A ttitude toward frien d s * ****** 67
A ttitude toward superiors •.*******««*» 71
A ttitude toward eubordiaates * ********* 76
A ttitude toward s rth e r »«•*»*<.#«•*•» 79
A ttitude toward fa th e r ************* €0
A ttitude toward f w P y * * * * * * * * * * * * * $3
A ttitude toward w m m #*«»»«***• **♦» 36
17, R r;L \tI«K lP BmSB?-tSK AtTXfGB33 MUSUKKI) BI
TH* 3A0SCS .W S M C W S T I® W JUKI) THE
POXHMKJSm RA3KE0 BI COOW « TAM H&Gt
to s w » -m O T is . * * * * * * * * * * 93
V
AStAlMMftlSi 121i/syf
l^
^ w ^ mhrmr m«u§' mm* #'T *^ *W *V * w, *™ *V *ff . V» »W »W *V » V* 90
If Jr
tttlM tom ** w U aagnm * . . * * . • * . * « * 97

H U M ) i n e r t am tfd lttlM . . . . . . , « » • 97
Oawopa fch* p*i* # # » - %• » » * • * # * * ■ 3^00
Atoitod©
IPw^r toward
W rf*lW ll * • to© fmfeWB ' • •V *W«“ •W• ” *“ «™ « *™ *w» ’C»r
99*Vw ml ” 104
PmPO^P^jr
Ato t toftO IWIWWNi SBBiS * 9 * # * * « #* a *# a#

A9%ton4fr toward . #********* 114
iH lfcttAa iwiftta * ************* 1X9
4^pn H|y<l fVftflflHffflff • ««»**#**#** # 1X9
A
■a y ytlilid
W r y a W iif tolfWPd
mFrnF^wmpBpaw ®ttt»td©r*
mP^^MP>9iimiP■pfcmp^pm *m “a W• -H•f V® *V B*f 0“ «A
"*P a #
™ ™ 3X9
i4444iliimU tnmirri SHytoox*

sanoar®©aF^WOWP^P m W w ^ p l i
miWm'WmWmfmFWI- wp *“ *ip *W *^ **w *V *“ * w* “ * “* “* “*' "‘* %jOl
Afctltod© toward Itotoor » # * * * « » * * * » ®* * 119
Atoltodo toward faadly ************** 1*3??
iia <ama> toward ».*«*»******»** 13F7
V* AUD C0H01^dXC3IKS i * t * # i # * * f * » * « « 131

SUBHW
fly a** * * * * * * * * * * * * * a * ** # # 132
Findings am eorxilng to© rsiU tion sh lp to to em
attltu d© and grad* In afcudeak-toaeiilng ****** 134
Abtiiud© toward ©oXloaguo© » * * » * * * « # * * * 134
A ttltudo toward own a b lllt lo s * * * * * * * * * * 134
A ttitu d e toward to o p ast » * * , * # * * * • * * « 135
A ttitu d e toward too M o o » * » • * * « * » » • * 135
A ttitu d e toward fto r * * * * * « • « « « * • * « » 13d
Maaaas s s s a
0*
aaisssaiaaaaaa
11!! ! I ! 111111
Attitude t<
I
I 1 1 1 1 1
i i 1
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
II ! 31
iiiliii!
III S!
*
31 s? 3
U S T OF TABLES
TABU PAGE
I* R e lia b ility o f Searing o f th e Sacks

Sentence Coapletion Test « . * • « . +*.*»* 26
II* R elationship Bftw ita Student-Teaching Grade and Sex 30
III* R elationship Between Grade In Student-Teaching
and Point-Hour Ratio (Men and Women) 32
17* R elationship Between Grade in Student-Teaching
and Point-Hour Ratio (Man) * ******** « * 34
V* R elationship Between Grad® in Student-Teaching
and Point-Hour Ratio (Woa»n) * . * * • , * » » « 35
71* R elationship Between Adjustment in A ttitude
Toward Colleagues and Sox . * • * » * » • • * . 36
7H . R elationship Between A ttitudo Toward Colleagues
and Grade in Student-Teaching (Men and Woman) * * 36
V III. R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Colleagues
and Grade in Student-Teaching (Men) * * * * * « 40
IX. R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Colleagues
and Grade In Studesxt-Teadhing (Women) • . . « . 41
X. R elatlenehip Between Adjustment in A ttitude
Toward Own A b ilities and Sex , * • * « « # * • » 44
XI. A ttitude Toward Own A b ilitie s and Grade
in Student-Teaching (Men and Women) • »«••* 45
XII* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Om A b ilities
and Grade In Student-Teaching (Men) **. »»* 47
ix
IGB
Ral&tleoohip Between Attitude Toward Own A b ilities
and Grade in Student-Teaching (Wasaa) « * * * « 4a
Rala&lonahip Between Adjustment in Attitude
Tdm d th e Past and Sax • so
Relat i onship Between Attitude Toward the Past
and Grade in Student-Teaching (Max and Woman} * « 51
Relatiqaehip Between Attitude Toward th e Fast
and Grade in Studant^ToacMng (Man} « : * * . » * * S3
R elationship Between Attitude Toward the Pant
and Qrada in Stud*nt~Teaching (Woman) * » • » « * 54
R elationship Between Adjustment in A ttitude
Toward the Future and Sax • * » * • » * • # « « 55
R elationship Between Attltuda Toward the Future
and Qrada in Student-Teaching (Han and Weoan) * « 57
R elationship Between A ttitude Toward th e Future
and Qrada In Student-Teaching (Han) « . * » * * « 50
R elationship Between Attitude Toward th e Future
and Grade in Student-Teaching (Woman) * • • ** 59
Relationship Between Adjustment in A ttitude
Toward Faare and Sex • • • « » * » • * * « • » * 61
Relationship Between A ttitude Toward Fears
and Grade in Sfcudeni-Teaehing (Hen and Waaan) , * 6a
Relationship Between Adjustment in A ttitude
Toward G uilt-Feelings and Sex * « * • * * * * * 63
1
TABLE PAGE
XX7. aalaiio neh ip Bstiwoan A ttitude Toward
(&dlt'*$dalingg and Qrada In 3tn M »
Toaohiag (Hon and Woman) * * * * # * . . * « * * 65
X23n. R elationship Bstwson Adjuatmant In A ttitude
ta m 'd Goals and Box * * « • « * # » # » # * * » 66
XX7XX* R elationship Botwssa A itituda T o rn d Goals
and Grads In Studsnfc^Ts&ehing (Hon and Mman) * * 63
m m * R elationship Between M Jostam t In A ttitude
Toward Friends and Sox * ♦ ♦ * * * * * ♦ ♦ * * # 63
XXIX* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Friends
and Grads in Student-Teaching (Men and Waoen) * * 70
XXX* Re la tionship Between A ttitude Toward Friends
and Goods in dtudentvre&chiag (Women} * * * * * * 72
XXXI* R elationship B d a x A ttitude Toward Friends
and Goods in Stude»t-Teaching (Uso) » # * • * * « 73
XXXZJ. RelaU«seiiip Between Adjustment in A ttitude
Toward Superiors and Sox • » * » * # * * « « * « 74
XXXIXI* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Superiors
and Grads in Student~Teaching (Bon and Wmmn) * * 75
XXXX7* R elationship Between Adjustment la A ttitude
Toward Subordinates and Sax *• »**• #*** 77
XXX7* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Subordinates
and Grads In StudontVTeaehlng (Hen and Women) • * 73
t g Si
and Oamda in 3tttd*nt~T*aehlng (Han and im a ) I1
I
5
4* 1
I I
i
3 «> e~ 3 3
m i !
m _ <rt A »J ti
i? 5m8 5 j?
i 2
1
g H
(3 § E (3
3I* £
I
3
_J J I
Ratio (Man and Woman)

f 1111 i
1
I §I i ! 1 ! I I | ! | ! i !
^ * U I ! 3 ! S I 3 I I J 5
1 I
1
B s'
i M
qgf.4i.
r m s
tSU R elatimxtoip Between Attitude Toward I m

m l PoinW fcur Ratio (Man) * . # , ♦ » *. « « * * 112
IXX« Batman A ttitude Toward Fîsa
m l Feint-Reur Ratio (Women) « * • « . « * . » * 113
1XXX* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Cfc*iit~F©elings
and PolaM onr Ratio (Hoi and \im m ) * « » « * « 115
tXXXX* R elationship Bstwean A ttitude Toward Chdlt^Feelinga
an d P©Ant~Hour R atio (Men) « * *» « * + •*** lid
LXX?* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Guilt^Feelioge
and Ratio (Women) ********** 11?
UR* Relationship Between A ttitude Toward deals
and PoiuW tour R atio (Urn and Women) * * • * • # US
1X9X* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward M eade
and Point^Hour R atio (Hen and Wonsan) * * * * * * 120
LXYXI* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Friends
and Point-Hour Ratio (Hen) ««*«##»«**• 121
LXTCXX. R elationship Between A ttitude Toward M ends
and Point-Hour R atio (Women) « • *«• »*#»* 122
IXXX* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Superiors
and lînt-ftoor Ratio (lam and Women) « » • # « * 123
UOC* Relaticmshlp Between A ttitude Toward Subordinates
and FoinW leur Ratio (Hen and Wawi) * * * ** „ 125
LXXX* R elationship Between A ttitude Toward Mother
and Point-Hour Ratio (Men and Women) » « * * » « 126
3&Y
TABLE PAGS
UCX3DC* SteXatioaehip Between A ttitude T©was*d Father
and Fednt^Hour Eati© (Men find Womn) * * * * * * XM
mm* B alationehip Between A ttitude f&mrd IML&ar
and FeinM ieer Hatlo (Ben and Woeen) * * * * * * W9
msr* Beftat iffnifldtJI'F Between A ttitude Teaeid ffiffflfflfi
and N M t o B atin (Ben and Wewan) * * * * # * 130
I
atari
eelXeagoes* th e a ttitu d e o f mm and wecm ee®&£md and o f wm m sep
a ra te ly toward th e ir o c t a b ilitie s *
R elationships th a t ware re lia b le a t lev els ranging from #30
to #05 were shown between student-fc*(aching grads and th e a ttitu d e s o f
m i and m am M l i o d toward th e past* gsstlt^foolings^ goals* sdb*
^ H tw ^ a n d women#
There wsjfq no mwi y*i>. cffeMtfW* botwoon grads in stew

dsBb^teaciiing M l aesr o f the e th e r attitu d e s*
f)i§ Sndtiboatod th a t th e Iwstweasi iôdtHMfefcQUBP1
p a tio th e domh^s a ttitu d e toward th e ir own efettcatoo m a slgnlf**
Icant*
flelatioiishipa re lia b le a t level® ranging C m #30 t o #10 wore
M m between peiaM ioor ra tio * and th e a ttitu d e o f am and m m
tallied toward g d U and toward nattier*
th ere were no elg o ifio an t relatio n sh ip s betm m paiaM m a?
ra tio s and eey o f th e other attitu d e s#
Froo th em finding* i t was ecneluded th at?
X# th e Sacks Sentence Compaction te s t as a w hde cannot be
weed ae an inctrua»nt tw* selectin g te a M rs#
2# C ertain o f th e a ttitu d e s are re la te d to th e c r ite r ia of
teaching success w ith warding degrees of r e lia b ility a* has already
been Indicated*
3* There I s need fo r fa rth e r research a ire d a t u tilis in g the
re su lt* o f th is sad sim ilar stu d ies to eenstroct a more v a lid and
e ffe c tiv e instrum ent o f selection#
m m m & txm
SN&Oiigabc&il W8WbOOM&lg
wtfch th * 4 m ta |W k o f o an x lx iuafeo pvwgratt fo r eelacM ag jwraona
o f Isldh tgaalttsr lr# ttw jg^fiooodiOitff $& &« tho
HBflHHt tOflOhOr ylifyfeafcfflfc OsdotO* I t MS0T b# fo r thtt t e a o h ^
fctminfwg inotitU&lOIUI h© SppSjf SOlOOtivO Ot&Xfe&llftdO t© thflfid %&&&0# # T
aAri «pjfl Hosfoaogtji 1® ^llftf ©tf ^*W> fftflt hhOlftl Or® h$# f©0
0®iltflj9&0 iJtttOOHOIlbo tO ajwfiflai Hjft ©fftaoro#. til® dffV^jl^fV*
IMdt Of l^TTiiffff lP* la a tfoftt af||ifctb
<a*gjag* tllff S&tOB&tf&l Of lllTOlVStd Jjfi fch© !3Kf hOMjkMOVW*
I t 1* to analyoo o»* •»«& in o trm n x t &g a solaotliHs dovioe th a t th is
otudr la
x« tot m«y^
M I t e S^SkH * IJwM**1
otudtr i» to dotewatno whether th o 3aoks SokAmmmi CMMMiMi. fo o t,
a psajeîlv o porsKmalit^ to st* najr ho 00*6 o ffootlvoly in tho
selec tio n o f atndaota who w ill ouoooed in th a ir fo r
teaching. S pecifically* lit pursuing th e problem* the to o t m s
ad aliiietered to a l l tho eenlnr ebodante in *2*wn le o te ia m eol»
logos daring th e ir period o f practlco-toaching « The re su lts of th e
to o t were than co rrelated with the eittdeote* oooeaes In preparation
fo r teaching m aswaumred bar two c rite ria * (a) smeeeee In aeadea&o
St
«s M N M d Igr feto w m nII ^ b M h w ra tio and (b)

wwoaaa m a r t n d l >aa<h>rf m nxunawd by ttw grad* be achieved
In tteta o— —«
to tfea p v m it o* tfala p r A ta la tho uadvrlying aaraaption
th at i f a a n t w t eaa ha fo n d ite m r«u lt® am eloaaly ralatad
to aacaaaa In oolieg* jsvp u vtlon for teaching i t would ba o f
w lw b U aaatat anaa to t o a id a n la oalootlng thosa atudnxta
I 0 teaching#
Current adatostoa p ra ctic es almost tm lversaU y u tilis e aea~
M s prcftotoiicy ** th e *el» f llo n M to r M s l m to teacher*
training program # fte y educators believe th a t p ersonality t r a i t s
say bo clo sely associated with sagsel i ence in te&ehtog* At prom at
there io a dearth o f relia b le inform ation m to to a t th ere trait®
gay be «nii #1 to haw th e? might be oeasnred i f th e? could to
t l f l edo th to study analyses fourteen a ttitu d e s measured by th e
Sacks Sentence Completion fe e t to aee whether th ere to a n y todtoa**
tton th at they are relia b ly associated w ith th e good prospective
teacher nore than with th e poor prospect* to already toSloatod#
to e two er lto rla weed to r th e q u ality o f the prospective teacher
are (a) th e grads to towdenWteaohtog and (b) th e potoW umr ra tio
in a l l course work taken p rio r to etodentotoacbing.
S£ to e sreblento This research to lim ited to

students to o took student-teaching during the spring semester o f
the 1952*53 sess i on to toe fellew tog in stitu tion s* (a) Centenary
I
I
\ 11
s
I
i ! M
4
turn w8Sastib3bB
' iui dw
w ntiU
filT PM
W Be
(poMMW^ <> &ti©&B©ft k&h iz&mw
BNP ^pwrWWflpfflP ^WWWwSWlWlr wflWW
^rW^WWB^
W t b* caroffeU p m od In M H m iU n w ith o&har footers* l« m u l

m
—- m33L
" oo lnto33otetioX am nooooaaaw'
*mm * f i w i w i ^ ' w l w # fIn
Pw a m ad twa^mw-
Vp RyerpFiW pr^ppppwpflfp# IPX
So r ofe renoo t o o wbko scXeettv* odHtOMten to tom bing* AmU

in s ta te th o t t i n ow m t m lty t o o u ter tho piofteotono should o at bo
Iq^Bt W v?wfilQV* rI^KM#®«IHl|l WHWliB |BPWtoWJ3^ 18m* X11|$eI MflVu
tfilMEftM&MP ***** ijr <
^»
WiMW##i-.«ii«gA 4i*fe«1[14aowiMii "©
W W * W ' aanmtPWtlPHM^nfHPWRWW 1*
PrM *iM
^ 'WBWmteteP »«lMrihtm
pF'lM telFlV
VW *Jte|
r JSPr Www*#n«i«i4 nrteil
oil^^^fl^NV^niinMMWlBt
IccMndttdiBi ©f th© field * ^ ©f & low©

PPl^P oW I^B^FV^F &ss*
gppTHffl©’ PPlwW"lFtlio&a *©«»oW*W(Tf
Pir^Wr UPPWlPHW ■» thaw
w f w *- In sftdlSSpii to # s»pp ^ n a |« ,.<«fittJ) %jm liitifftffihliiijg pp©£^6alon t©**
(galT©© th& t 4%© wpsber© pewssfls o f Xaadflarahip ft©©©©©&x$*
to hiilp ch lld y w d68Fvo2op tfeo^j? ots^pooitipH© tJu*om^jbi. ©©^l<©ttctfi sts 00m
ift® JSWWWB^ptp^ SbfiMf ^SM

iR3^SN6ti9y^8^t
fo r tfcts m otff*
Qovwbnhp 9Smwbo S* ®©©©(f ©JP M©©<!£b®8fc Iur© ©&©&©&tlSMKb liH tfo©
#jfoô^ SBB^ldUl t t o ©# fMPftfltHMTff ©BMPt b© tfct®
Mgr o r ovngr ed ttso a and oduoater. I t I s « n a tte r o f personal in te r-
mm© UmA 4ltn t millmrDl a# ©titiP oMtilwiiiM oJmiMlii Hot M tlilliH jftpâBi t>k&
«M«atHi o f Mm qKIobI voanffi ruifmtfto^
D enlel S , ( P tm tte and Qovtd U C b d c. ftroMMMB CMC

4
^jfaadtoME* Jte^jL Jfiwraiw i^^ j| jf^Hjp^yt Of Hi© IÎKllPd JS43®SllSS,w
0 M ftroo 3ehoc£L novsloinobb
Aoooo&otlon* Albanjr, Bow Xwte, X953* p. X?.
2 0 , Howard OooXd# ■^Htov& al," Haw York atafca Kduoatloin.
391347, OMoObor, X95X.
9 B mbm 8* Buoy , "Sohoel Pn*lhm - 3b tbnr Toaric M ato,*
»w Ttafc a teto BtotafctBB. 39>172, Dooontxir, X95X*
i i rr
nr
r
“ 1
iiJ •
j^tp
ft
i
§
I
a
Vlt
6
tM flhiag prcutaa»i«m «md Imme. ifto jr w tis o . Edswiatasblijg id en ti
fica tio n and w t w ttoa %mA to 3«ut di© sity w d rospsot to the pro~
faosion . Hi#» standards damndiiig m pu cim a b ility w rm to ch al-
wWH flP WifyHmfmlBNF f WaHg
Steett m g that no tme H ill **«*»««» « wma&er m is in the

poet e a r yyiHMf teacher &£ teffrfvwai1yotxtrh* Tost th is
th e to a ^ c r a tU . need g re a te r pm$mr&tr$m and b e tte r jw s a m l tr a its
ta w obhp v m w w am waw |Wmm>» etSbB^feîb
jh9Bw &
^kiieêsis a^dêdtp Bepee^dta dh4aMbBee tafiMh dt'beîh.
ok 'It J&.
gre*i» ersg^yye»w3e«« jais®
D elta Kappa <tana should M to g VteM $ar II imderfcafoe sm invest!**
gwA4j» ^ te a pppblSB e l the b etter $ f teaohsrs ie
elotfBsnb beebitaaMsv t h*^ th e jaw bere iwfwider thftfif a pr o l e s %wt
a it d wgHMSPCf% theee aenfeere beH eve that i t i» th e M et "Vital
nlflglit jprobhae e l f i ieafcto i sow and le r years t e eewe*^
fb as th eae statem ents seas thee e f th e o t ©el.ee-*
tSzwe eeeewSStoflHt and the derelojaexnt $£ of
sal & siloo east be gpdJssd#
S f# «♦ S tlanstt* »I<3«ntificatl«m And 3e le « tte i Of Pros**

pacfcire Teaeh*ref » M fork State Education, Sftl% *$$» itoMfesr*
^ K# b e p e t Strok* Ida A* Jewefct# and Vara M» Butler*

naMAdiw Ctf y«BMa*twt-» Uittfumwirih SwwnftffiWflfl ||w ^he
BsHa Kappa Qesno S eslo ty , m n b o d by N ational Capital. Kwws*
I n s ., uosfeSagfcaa# B. C», 1949* p* 1*.
7
xx« mrmxrxoKs o r m m vm >
JfcfiBK JS&JMBiSSiybBI
iso jsstto * t sshatogisu derive th e ir t i t l e eras th e ten s
BESfeS&SgS* wbleh haw a v srisijr o f toaafage,, saa* o f Which
S ^ w S m W * m * psrfctoldeseripbisti o f the jw esssses
tom ivsd to Uwm teohnl<iuos, and etnas o f which arc unsuit
ab le. At j e t , a s e le sr and eoemea d efin ition o f uhs& l*
■sent tgr *pee3s e tiv 8“ has appeared among those who use
th ese esth etic, sltheegb tlw w i s g m e a l m a p lt la i s i
i s l nf&toa to the iwe o f the terra.
PrejsettoE i was f i r s t used to a jw yehotogicol sense
har K raut, see « f to o ss d e fin itio n s eeedst
H » aWftineitflK Af iwiuw* *^toa»#w wEwBkQP^Sor*'
HEM-4
Wi^ranuti
OOi ^FTi* ÎfJhss
PwPWS mAsI va^snr -4
^jaOnW”OPSp4 10js
100
a parisdtlvs s:»€h&nla& i&ich* f a r iMfca&oo* also Inflnoneoa
our *a%yj oo tibst I t has bho gsos&oot
iharin l a ah*|A to m p oga&or \#nrld* yndar oondttia ii# th a t
has* n e t y e t hsso s n ffis to n tly dstow daed e n a to n er p sr-
•Options o f Idoi&isn&X and am pm**
Joofeod oo&osrdlPji «MMtycu» i^hI am mad to
^ o u ter w srld^ sft##mia th s^ oughl bo- retaaln In the
ism ar w i l t
a A. idLk|n| ^Mhito 4KwM watoM.toMulhitoto ®tsirtto 'MBK.ofe^Stoftoi
a aosBosnss* oo iitw r so ssO' cMB»3n3»vaLOt* s a g n a e ti ojjr i sSaay $
Sworns®* sod 3cwemi Psajaobion la â dslhiMsiws presses
sndor SMof o f tb s p3aaauro atearol^ t ftny ^sffl
tbSMSlUi rwmaa sw» ^lIms switoMiJil saftaWTijf *tgM»jtorstoa»f*&±n& tg&afeli«m& Mid
Idooap otsioti^ I f nllrniinl t o $owdtm&o in to 9
w tald bo p ain fu l to th e %s*« Mirren a lso -d m io ie a d*f~-
jgfci^sm fnllinritlfr th e UflMB Of t he tom * II©
describes p ro jecticn "as the t«»iderioy to aseribo to tb s
ssfessnsl Morld r^ rs s e s d nastsX prooeeeee which are no t
ipfinmml uroil oa «# ru>yja/viai o rliiln aaofl oa a r e e u lt o f
thf* frmrtitntff o f theffm promwâoe la •ttw|iî^;jiftniW^ on i®fc
0etap pMPoopfcian* w KogM#Bsf too # foll«nia iM a tre a d , Id o ati^
fylnfi p rojectio n &a a iwohonian o f defenao^ c a llin g i t m
««tttaraatla etabllise»*#Q In ¥hieh p ainful ego ^ w a e te ria tlc e ^
i . e , , th e i x o M M l i aapaota o f p ereo m lity , are mb recog-
nleed a» belonging to ouraolveei hence the^ ere diaownc^d and
a tta in e d to o th er poeoona* th^w w w idiit tlif^jf th e IndtvidaaX
to oeffflipe the o f t gffl<ri*ii»w
antB g^y
^ th is
♦h^ponsdbillty ia sh ifted and oelf~r©speet i s nsintained«^'
7 Jc in Etos^sto B ^ lf ^ o ^ s g t^ s TsciiRtoues. (Saw T«fki

Lnneeoae, Oram to d C o.. I f
$
1 11
.5
w I i n i
M
*1 &
1 i !
liiitiili i
9
su b ject over th e behavior which I s to be e e } ^ and

produces responses re fle c tin g ills own individuality*
The in tsrp rsh stic tt th e su b ject mkm& e f tb s t e s t sit-*
u atio a provides th e f i r s t re fle c tio n o f tb s personal”"
ity * I t i s asstmed in th ese issh ^ tg u e s th a t th e
in d ividu al o rg a n lm events in te rn s o f id s sm
activ atio n s# perceptions# attitu d e s* ideas* emotions*
end a l l oth er aspects o f h ie personality, 9
S is second aspect o f jasfchod to projective
M n i i W is th a t thagr sample in d ividu al behavior l a
a s tr e e tured event o f su ffic ie n t b rev ity to be clinA©*-
a lly praot t eabl e and o f s u ffic ie n t stim ulation to
s a i l fo rth a vide range o f individual responses#*®
A th ird eh araetarisb le eecmn to th e method o f
p ro jectiv e techniques i s to regard th e recorded
behavior* as m i l as th e p erson ality th a t produces it*
as aa organised to ta lity .* *
Sentence eoBipjeticR te st*

A m id M t e s t co n sists o f a ixuober
o f ineenplete sentences presented to th e su bject fo r
com pletions, the t e s t i s usually g o t a sta n d a rd ise d
t e s t and i s ra re ly tre a te d q u a n tita tiv e ly . I t taaar be
a& dnlstem dt to a group o r as an in d iv id u a l te s t* I t
requ ires a etninttn o f supervision# U sually sen ten ces
are selected which explore s ig n ific a n t a re a s o f an
in d iv id u al1* adjustment* o r in sp ec ia l situ a tio n s
te s ts nay be used fo r the purpose o f in v estig atin g
seas sp e c ific c lu s te r o f attitu d es** 2
afcflfrft Sentence Completion Testa A sen ten ce eoeapXetiosi t e s t

devised by ®r« Joseph M# Sacks and o th e r p sy ch o lo g ists o f th e Hew
9 Ibid*, pp* i**5#

10 fold*, p* 5*
H Ibid*, p* 6*
12 tasmpemm Edwin Abb and Leopold Beliak# fraleg&lws
Psychology (bde Sevki Alfred A* Knopf# 1950)# p* 3$7*
10
To*fc Mntotdmt&aa HeabaX I
A ttitu d e. A d isp osition with regard to a person* th in g o r

a m d itio n a
Savwgsto d istu rb ed . The su b ject appear© to aw p lre ther*

•p w tifl « U In han g i ng emotton&l e m tlitshe in th is area*
i M r disturbed. The s u b le t ha* «aotiom l conflict© in

th is area but appears able to handle them uiiheut therapeutic aid .
-jjhUL sISaSjBl* eebiesb has no sig n ific a n t diatmbane® in

tid e area*
^ jjja a t* * ta a ^ d a it a ra d s *
G reeted team ing wider the supervision o f a sîporvising toacher.
P oin tsw ar r a tio ,

hsace the nunbsr d <jaftlit3r paint# earned by the student in
^ courses teHift prior to the senestor Sn ih U t ©tudaaWte&ehlng is
taken* th is r e tie ie derived by dividing the masher o f hours earned
tali* the nissber o f cu a lii? eedbate asrA ei fh® divXsieu la carried
out to th e nearest ten th .
XU. SOOECES OF DATA
the d ata u e d in th is study vara seem ed by adsdadeboring the

Sacks Sentanee Cfeaptstlen Test to the student^teachers during the
33 ib id ., p . 370,
u
•pptng iMwanwr o f U 53 a& atomm Lewlatana t«»«&*sM;ralMag tnB tl»
fcttrik&
*nm aatfaa m
#W
^p»ofc M
P*&
r mRMgrnm* S HiK
SS Sm
tftitw
(PWolt-tt*
PpHp.
?fefc 0SSfetL&8£i
^fOPBO^SOS<O
^^S^SW fcP<* jk
^P faîftn
Om W iiii*
fOP^P OOfMLjk 4]fo*|
OW *Q
S^P.S*m
jSiM,dl*mMt. ^4w
piSp OPaPW ^PSpSW
BppffaSoP^^SW SWSOS^l&
ssi th* {oSsMstar v%&ta§ far mch «f ttaot m m
aigmti ffeso tH$ vooqv&i «f th* diisetsm of stute^feea/Mng at

tlm
iv* o k m i, w hg® ot m n w
JP®WP^P®B^fal® ®0|W
®®fi®SSiil
Jp®MP^^®E8®fe3L^^fe^y ^g ^p®9®W
S?^ ÎttSW^ ^3^®W
Sfcfi^0®JN®
i& tllS f*f jsiSS^îty t>i|^^^Wipttya%t

S******
flfefc&JlASiwn
kPMtipfe «
£oE
ifcl 4iK
fc£tw
-OP
lfr W
SfaO
oA
^NjO
&
SOfc
wtlM
B^*
l: A
jftM
ki^
w A
PS» ww*8w
JlfeSAIfcM
fcAOrtfetffc $ ^l&
JtlK £Sfciiat3
® tilBiltaG
s3 iH
PjO
^ Oa
pMjSilih
g ^w &fO
fi^l%SP
lj.jjy
OOOpJOfpS OOStiSnflSO fjH
^yif*' £|jfh0®& « Ifl $&S aMH$iif%N
ll
fhao as i t m uaod in this #tsM$f &
t>soMists o>f Jtliit^fMsix, iasst*
pl^ts ooofesnooo ifhiahj iffM
WPt axis fOK’pssftsit is swBfisssths
oSbJoat*o attitude toward. coll6&£3i8&» own «jbilit3ss* ilia mat* ih®
l tt« w , §m un, g « tlt iteaOiwg*, g o a ls, friLerato, m psrlfitrs, subordlna&va,
OfcSlmx'V Pttwll^B*aw^ SMffl,. 2jf ill® ^ b&tlSKSStil®
ulMindM *****^ otsosiflH
lGz*il*4U!*i&f^r teiMSdnR euacsMiB is ftaExd to
tm m % £ M a f«r s sufiisisrS maSarnt o f thm attltw<Sso, its im t «ti#t
ho ooofal Is tho moot likstr prospseta for to

teaohtft^tminifi«*
gp fflifoiCTtitol* gg» q£ t4a©
In ChapUr H I*
litre** %m%$t m m m m & th® g r& to
a»3 po^nW iow ra iie e a&ts&aed* eaeh a ttitu d e mm M l« d sep~
m& «3y# &#*fe
th an 1b w lr ttim M j fc® tlw potafc-femp ra tio s* Th* sttufcr o f «►*
gtuttent Is $vee0K&e& In ^ y^#y ff!T» Tto& o£ tiie

1m&!mmsi th e d ttitw liii «w<s t tw i ^Sbs^ sw nssybnn In
hnmmm| bA In Gâfeip Iff*
Si ih s ^ ^ ? y iwi# tint # wte ifaa?# iftêngged .In
MWIAV «w^ ttUblilidMMl 'klui fSbtt|J^JifaBi*!mliM
ii &*■&& «£# A-*-****--
PWliBP(6®#*^
SU&VsT OP IflSSiH!®© InITBRASIIHB
to th is «ta|*«r • nwimt to pvsssnbed «C gtmttm totob turn

ntlm iiad t* M teet to* hast prapMfttos tsaehms «n th* basis «f
« U 1 sml la asst w m tojM&lw « M n s» i Batov* pratMnttog «
miaaijf «T tbs atadfem which tan* bssa sslsstw i Her toctoatow to
ifclS thSStSP SHOThS HsH hS'POSS? SW^hllli' SbllSb
■jlhftja OMHitaaSKJlflHS SM^P^ jAkSIl StSMS^SMrilfepaiSkt
&» ataafeiag li& asstsa* rs la ts d h# to c h e r m lae& isa or® I s

ÎSttPtfMkmaUktfft ttflPBbBh 4kftllSSV^MKH^P
misSittMa^sn»
SfeBP"am
i rMMlbt KpfW#
|w SfcttfcaP wksSp
jfcWiP, *WHRmffmgf
SflNSwS'iSfcSMlw 1W
Skd
EP ffwPW
iifif t|%jBiff
9MiW BP 's
i^Sl AhSwslH
SW ^t-Sklfe
wl
PuS
B WBNW
aSifW
Cttai^fe w W H M R iv wK W■>»
fti l UP^P
I a^S
swSI^fflp
S>~y.A
VwâSti «SPfcAMSaaiPfrasflHFV|(f
Q 4 Jkw1w1lfflW SMa- «KMsl
Afefcjid fP
pmSSiw AkS4â&&
f!)0 IrU w I
mmmA m
1WW.WI flttlVi 1*0wNk«4MHitoiiiPiPA
jwpON* vA ^bft. Mifltoiip SifcÔ ShlbfciJtt^toJb. Sfc^—A -t^. JtlfcfcJtato SJk«A:^m-i
n V3S*r Qm wSiQ wmsmm#. WmmSSp*
tSS* JSfSSSMhO in lf lt o l l#1f¥S0 %^[|^%i| ;f 1*<f 'lltai fflpo f:l'1ir!W:‘M
“
flM ltlllS o f ^«M>a <jf 8itldi00 Shiah IkVQ KoSft d®tiP5plsCl <W& &&&£
i s * ls » « r os&aat* p rseso ts m m o f th a fs s a its a t those studio®*
Ana Qf th s BOS& SlMriUSlS fiSTttft11^ 1$
Igr s vwr&rnr o f ttio Mtoco&u** Is th at a ll o f ifco studios siarass
tit* Japortanc* o f am! zxo*4 for tsaehsr sslssticn * Basi o f thaa
«2s* agroe th at th srs a ss U t ils s a ils dots i s Is mod m a b asis
te r eelsetioR .
tha in w filg a ils s s I s tills fla id a il ham as ih s ls amla
pwppum th s uXilsafcts piasonMRi o f taslbox* cjuaXIXisd tsosh sss In to
3
i « 11
%
H*
$ j
i i
I
4
i
, *i * 1
i iilil (M i l H "i *1,i ;
9 £
JI i
I
37
jiH&fldfePwsifr tin jan&lHBi in tin •tn iy inaainntt jpiNNllntiins iy
* « » n? ft Frojaativ* fce*i tin way* in whiei tm eksm interact
« ith m i i r w a$ vm tm M i bp ofcwawaticmal data* Ha devnlnpad a
^hflnatia ABfjft>awfci.flB t e s t m# a
*aa t
e w « w m p ,w(RWn(p ewa t^ a n
nmFW a #
neat e>naPWH>W x&a**
Soma ooUgnrlM of latwawfetat wm* oaSoolod to few 2ao»

ndsiiaril in titn atadbr* iSiay wafttnnwi the t©achar
ttm&sp acasiaiii^# thata* tts iy
n^pflnAHMOTp^ tjhsdbr nc^wantianasMn^;^ thaijp dinnptlnip furft tinta*
a ttn tla u $1& Shftnatia AptNM,a<^j3tl>an teat înalapwi bp tyUnaHMlav*
2iHWPBit0iy$ tbs ttMntinnai* ^tet*#at Bl&hfcf tin
t HniHnrtNyy to slnsdiifliNtâsBiaHpii a t tin j fytawnnf ty ©d? ffteh aynl

aemaPbated tin ananSia istdtoas ftf atetidMfey snde t y
fft^Mfniaaan* Ha aoaainiati tHftt t i net jand&ni
liaiiaiTiliin ——— tg|a?
Tfaw ir *«a paoa analvm th a aalaafciM mfMraisaa in asBawbSeB

la Mow took otafco «nA vtapno U n lw oity. ttautmmOw tho Sm rnt thoy
* Bmwob Ammhmmv J r ,0 “loo rw w ietion Of Toasnop-F^pa

latom otion with A Project!** Toot," Jm m m l <j£ caiw loal famttic
6i*73-*76, *O y, 1750.
3 w m » Cm Tam »rt J r» . "tnw ooaalltjr B uns In ToaOhor
S o lo ctlo n ,” H>1 Pol&a K agan. 35»271-*7*, 277, A p ril, 1956.
i
J>
1
I
i
1i
i
wwum ilUl iVwU'QiliQ iTWWWwy JTOTUIwlMflif^
viffi HMfiiti ipufiiNf s®ipsyidL#60iE3r 0$
ar i t i o tg8iBlMB?ii|i <b4 ijsMKPvliWfli Aii inetnAiaAashSi fo r jpiPiHfifeiAfejyog

%i(MMB4sSttA AAMMMMM* Hi ©OAf>|jhilWil thtfjh tnteriliAWia HTHfll DigAro#9E^hs o f
tllitfn illAW9P> JJO&9&MI IBtiNVt jaW^HOhitWI
l&GMi A&AiliAtii tlW aCAîAh&Alt Of fftliOAlSA IfrlftfllffHjf <gg|
*fotn fSWAi th s f 1^Tiy?flffitt1% o f th e
f 2$a riw rtltw ffVtinii<l t# th e
A&ttia£&£&. S8B tUfiti bft fgrc^&0&e& hjP r®Sjfe: in h&ih SdbOtiS^
u & adbalafflAKi be pr^SAhSKt fha* yiww11* t>gfe%^y t hem fei* inin#^
Bjaa^^ 0 jîgAls6 ra&ioji t’tinlt i ff ytfî^ ii,
alette ABd eea u e An eertain A0yd per**^ ^ - ^ty toatff in
uiltthittR to jff**T,y ts&£jq$i& amyf sbSjab* Hi ineSttM l &$
attenuates o f th e % lf Kfi>ity <yf 'WieoeKittitt# Hi th a t th e re
i i m mlMal£ijBarst eorrel£&l*xi between th o tw c r ite r ia o f ieaGhin&
ennaeii end th a t th e rank o f th e tout**? in h er high eekool claoa in
tb a b u t o f w m ll sain»^
* M h » 2* tsrosw ami C* Robert z>ace, m m lm M m In fffftfhar

an (ftuhinghea* D* G«t in erlean Council i i i S i m # £ T O 7
pp* £6-*f»
5 Herbert I* Von Baden* *An evaluation Of PerawMaal Data
SM U m d In th e Frediotion Of Teaching Bfftetanasr*” 4maemX o f
££«5*»nfcal fftnt#-Ifflr l$t6W & * Septesfcer, 1%6*
^ Leo Joaeph Line* ‘•Hie Fred&otlan Of Teaching Efficiently***
Journal Of Eaporlraeixtal Education* X5t&*6Q* Sopfcosfeor* X94&*
7 Ronald BeVail Sm m $ "The l^red tetim «2f Teaching
Kfftoienear O blieU M Wtoaaoree," jtem aal .Of ItoertoBagfcal
1 5 1 ^ 9 7 # 3^pte»ber# iW *
m
GhpedLdae* SW
wai^l
SS^BBi llMM
S f S w jlnHm
S ^ ^ P SnegBtm I e —SSSSe Ifeim
a B iiiE
S'BteSAB faJ.Ja
BRmftr s'— ^^BVSe^Bb. SSSS SAftiA
A^NmttMwyifrM
wM ^s* TpBeHMBBS^^mUlIi
W-^wkHBlHFjuan
BBpBNMriBB
alwlMrti I aim lm a a t t i m Sitafea Q olvw raity o f X a m t o d o tan stn o A t b w

iMMw YBlltfMBtfKtittltttfk mam 4& rifc4N
s^^W wroPfc&
flp'e® Slh4fe
is^sP &s&
B^ VtfcfefejB’teW: tiftes -flB-df -4fe^MM
aBPiPwijp#M
WySHiM tafcM
?swwwwWiiN
piif*
3^BBP
tfcaar ooqpurad atradaafca la Dm Xawaafc and hi^Mot <|uayfcaMi. Itwy

ftmnd a» « a n a taagMnsanUa pa&bwna w n dtooovwraMo la tbn data
ftr tta w i m gnmidsga o f
B ffa bWfeW»Wi
t o «^1îawli^feâdlMi^te anil mu&ffitt OP fa’i Imhw Jj& aîiâwi*u>»ffloMwo
aaoatt a ta d a o ta a t Dm S ta te taaflb ara G oliaga la K ana& ald, P annsyl-

mada* Xn &. fo il lift#11Up looatitrt off M« £&&&&%? #tlldetfl&**
hBBUGhBHPS ®8bfl sesjess&ertt tlie&dP t # X^S&ll th***15 an
BfeCfS^ritoiwiy*' H# &m3& s* teBssFslet^Mes tBd&®swsn e&sistlst's&l,
e ttflH n itr a s KMSS&Esd l y th e Pw sssgr 3W3 t e s t sffl4 th** *
Ha afl^s hep a i l e$ie ahiffltf t s o tetdllM ky
Mmt|^l dnîaafot^fa* |^«pya«ii!*jf«nqttt?y tdlSjPty PSS" SSflt IthO lftt<£P cl®fV®3b9|? l&tO
g w rtiB iiin ilu d iB d th e r e la tio n hetwNwi a te a e h e r1* speech

and Id a twatftrtntt a h U lty . Ha fwaad a p o s itiw bob low e o m la U m
(.204*03) batw aaa orffcie-fcaaefaasra* ra tin g s o f th n te&aboni* v oices
awl w l&iffiP m
mMB lliw a^r9Kff ih a PtaOJlhQPB?
WWWfPPlIHa |ÔDrM*PDPWiteH^dP»^PF tdftflhlwiaf
W^te"wPWâwnPrte(JJpt a b ility
âF feSP 4al^■ tliG
"i«n«»M' SOhOOl
■■■ "" 1 - -' r-
9 ^ » M n Off&GHta* Hawy K» ZSewlwii* *3fcsvsesMisnft jCti

Prospective Teathe***, sfamtal jQTEdueatimal ®easarch«, 35*&$M>93#
say , **mu
9w Georgge A* Betsn* ttBBwfcic«al
WWMdrllFteM®P'^ **WV w•^PteW^HF^^*PfPlteWPfllppp' <In spppta
flWlnpH b Mility
q|ipP|tealM And Te&cshiian
IiMMPÎ^|^ ■apppw> « IPW■"•l'"LPJHe
mi m
37*135-141, Oetdbar,
21
fhm bafcwwan teaching a b ility m &gr

fl^tde-4iûshw ra An^ iteiaool sow rvdtstiiii J& ©ca*lbi.w bob 1m
(•34>&«03)« tb s #8$p0il*&ictt& beiu&on ira^M $$i& tfSsyc^Sng a b ility m
iMttyfl* Mp*w» ilw i Ka^Jt yftfciBffll OTO &EtF3P&flfti <wfo %«• MlMifiN&»todhKPl6
(.6 » .0 3 ) o** tiwa both skiing# net made %* pftafeU© ts$b&s&> map#■jpviaoam
(.5 3 t.0 3 ).l°
Stoitel^p»|^| ftHffl &iy*rym^yiy HMttl FM^ttiW' B&$$lS$i SfiSilS FM
Ii^fefiMfifeflflMi %0 qftfea'is* JJU|)4i®* T&%$&j$3L <&£ tMk$tlM$* flMMMI &&& 1SHW
WI
Bf¥fojtMf$r#lij $& & ffftft%fffl* 4# ulig&i b$msl$&3l* 4rfHf^-%1ff IM&*"
ooBB tui 1 ^ JînQMÛi SBB5pstiyhgr ns&l lôjSbôtljQgial l^pwdfcy'
ftBQOQffiwS X0P k&8
^fatete^^te^teafcJlR^te^te Jk
WtmSBS^B-it^
ajuhlJitvafcdHh WBMII
JBByayy f&Q&bid. %<»,y ^ $$$£ Jblfe$$|£ jNE%l0' &£ $

device fo r securing p m m ll ^ r ra tin g s « f pre^teaehlng atateB ta .
te a • fa,JI** U 3 stu d en ts a t Bair York telv aratt® ' and cacteluded th a t,
ta la s th a WUte S ating S eal* , th ere la a a lginl fia a n t c o m latlcm
te te w a t t e n& laga glim s a groap o f o to d asts W to o groa*» o f fa e -
a r iM n ^
Seaga used th e C alifo rn ia B ating S tela Fop P ractice Teaching
10 srhm S H, B aarlatete* "Ooapariaorai Of R atings Gt Voloe

te d Teaching M Q ^ r," Joarw al qft SdoaatAamX P«yeho3xaar. 34*121-123,
Fateuaigr, 1943.
U h . T. Sm ladad and H. H. Samara, "Factor Analarafia Of The
Purdue Basting aeaXe For In a tru e ta ra ," dourm l Of. M ta a tloret l
Psychology. 34*3&3-367» September, I»I3«
12 teteagr B. te te r , "tha fie U a b ility Of The W itte P erson ality
S ating S cale," iSESB& ££ B daeattaaal Psychology. 34*333-377,
S ap tteb er, 1943.
22
m a e rlta d fln to area* and te s ts of groa&oot i^ d io & lw

w lao* mm found th a t th o T te s ^ o ^ w th , B ell Bwamnfcor
1fcttrwt<*», Ka*vlof and C em -^loans paw ed m o t gm dStitive# Tosfea
o f isdM&ligmoo* and a ltitn d s s and In te re sts tm m
lifc tio p re d ie tieo m ltio# m » above standard ised to o ts am mom
o a lid c r ite r ia o f teaching sosoooe than am scholarship and sab*
ada^bflil^s^v^âo ô^ôoiâiowokltiaio ’#adk<
^4fe#^^^sw^d4' -c sa.
1mm Bm&m* studied eoloetod t r a i l s o f 20 toashcm In nela~

tio ft t o tb o ir ta ftd b g s h in ty . Ho fornd th a t th e toaishei*’f»
s o c ia l a ttitu d e s* a ttitu d e to sard teaching and knowledge o f w s ta l
hastens am oSonlfSoaaBOly m lato d to a b ility # Ho *flfcss-foand th a t
tooidsdgo o f su b ject m M m * pemonaJJiy# a b ility to ajrs
a c t gjgni s taofftf y m is te d to te&ehisss ablliigF *^
M artin sio d ted solsottw a a& sisolm to S tate Tsaehors Collage*
Trenton* Mew Jersey* Her research shoo* th a t ffcefcom *Meh oootrih«
at* aaot to in it ia l selectio n am w ritten BaglLsh* objectim
scLenco* sehdel standing# end
13 Kay ▼# Seago, *Fre®Bestte T ests b id Te&ehtng Success**

^S 0® 6t ^SSE£SSSfe3^SB3B^LJSfltffiiiEQflSSltiP 30*685-690, Mhjt, 1% S.
14 im n 25* Haettear* ^D o HOaeomoont and Fm dlotion Of
Teaehiag A bility,* Sohoel and Sscietar. §1*30*32, «Tanna3py# 1940#
15 Im ia 0*Martin* _ The P_ rediction
*
Of Success For
w ■mmmm.
Student©
M i l *i#<iii»«tf4#P5«» 4m Sm m ■ m m tim & m m U m
ty» yfuMiuM &
. ednealriton £lu
1 (»*M
\# ik#X
9w Y
MjiM
wl#
ip.l B
criti MiP
OU <ftJfT
tu #Ô
m #in
A
o
Bu
Utt IIfif
d#
T#
*# ft&Hastlahs,
i9h
«1 TsaohMrti
® S « i5 M E n S S Lw
i ilfcy-, 1964) HP. In 4 • •
c h a p te r m .
m jx im m p w arn® m r m m v m m tm
m vm sacks srns& cB c x m v m m « w
AND QKA22S 28 STOEKB1Wffi',A®!BS3
| q i k i i chanter fmirtmnn laeaeured ittr feK*

3antenes Qon&IM im fe e t are analysed in rela tio n sh ip to the grads
im studsnt^teashing, to determine whether th e Sacks to s t has pre
d ic tiv e t&1u» fo r success in teaching* the stiukm t-toadiin® grad*
has to m ee lse te d an a measure o f th e students* teaching a b ility
f o r tm r reasons* F ir s t, i t i s a is s ^ N a to m i m lQ s r av ailab le
ap p raisal o f t t o students* f i r s t a t t eaching*- SocouHiisf, i t
i s t to fontoL myf reesrded ra tin g o f ahAth,
i s many e a ses, *01,1. ever Is# iwtfc o f th ee# twMMdiere* dsfeoel adtoSn^
i i t n t e n and ■mnanrto w a m t e M i d l i k t o *valuat» til* tifw W
i w i i n o t a tm o f tto m train*** aton thsy torn wotiwed t t o awtlvs
moles a t t t o t —tirfag jawtoaolonj but to r m a r t t o stutoBtHtaacAiog
grads pjf|ffos f»|fe th e only formal and recorded ap p raisal o f th e ir
f d l i t y as teachers*
f t seam s a fs to assume generally th a t th e student who m las#
a grads o f A in student-coaching has dons a good job o f teaching
and th a t th e student oho makes a grads o f C has dons a re la tiv e ly
poorer job o f teaching* For th ese reasons th e stialsnt^tsaeM ng
grads has been ©elected as one standard fo r appraising the q u ality
o f th e students* teaching.
24
The results obtained <n th e 3solmte s t fa r eaeh o f th e sew-
•MX a ttitu d es wfcdeh th e te a t purports to neasure too se rru la te d
with th s grede »ad» In stadent«teaefclng. This In done by redw ing
the d ate to santlaganey ta b le s and em publng Chi-equare co rrela
tio n s. The wndasdydiig aasuirgrtiaa here 1* th a t i f a high co rrela
tio n were found between th e re s u lts on any p e rt o f th e te s t and
grade and* i s studant-tesshing* than th is p a rt o f to o t would ho o f
ass ist anas l a th e jw e«tm laiag oolostlow o f th a w aha would suesesd
in student tsaohjjig.
XftsftdMi tiotiTirtifrn t i l t in tsfxasiap* si^bSSiidhi „
Tht fflufeiy o3t m i&o $vw tt^^ww»Jjsr d0Ls%!ifipb<Ml^ ndUU$2$r sfx&

uv&£ siw jEfWswaEPdiNSI $&. at ftels $s <sCfcjM>
dans f a r th e weana* These d ate than w a adalktaS to 'Mae QMUeqaere
Caf*> te s t o f iadapsatMwa o f taw fh etera to see i f th e re le a e ta -
t ls t ie s lly relia b le dlffenenee in th e adjustm ent o f th e soaaes toward
th e g in e a ttitu d e.
B pjy^bilitjy Of Scoring. Before dlseiiesing th e a ttitu d e s la

relation sh ip to th e student-teaehing grade th e re are e e rta ia MM
I^ r*A]n*r*. to th e atndy which should be presented. The f i r s t has to
de vt**» th e r e lia b ility o f th e te s t seorlng by Me in v e stig a to r.
Ths y —+«<»» ra ise d ls» "A fter th e te a ts were soared* I f they ware
at.— resto red* how g reat i s M s p ro b ab ility M at a given student
be e la s s ifls d on any given a ttitu d e in to th e sans eategory on
m
fteorlng M ortf»r to check the relia b ility of the
securing laethod and o f &t* ewn <mstot©si^ *& scoring* the irm eti^
gator scored the teat# m l then approximtely months after the
original soaring* m m d a saiap&a o f WL teats sslsoted at random
ffcam 4U. those included in tfan ©tudtp. the result* of tills study* of
the re lia b ility * f the scoring are pH m uM i In fable X#
Sate in th is ta b le are arranged a t fo31«w»i th e top i w in
the shew th e attiber o f judgBsant* In which a t r a i t a n elassS**
fle d as sev erely <ttsfc«rb*d on th e f i r s t scoring* I t * d ll he noted
th a t i f th e re a re 14 a ttitu d e s to he c la s s ifie d fa r each student
th e re ew e atndsots Imsludsd in th s rm eerin g th a t th e
nmrflirir o f uW ^R M M avivvai’ to ha
jtMinmw^tt m(r*mr mtrm^mwmr the
wwptw Wwp'T mdtmm i§ iw*tPnm^bwt*,
W'^rwW^yraneiysywp |F^Pw
n » M4C> m r o f the itU * show* tto ataiMr of tifalts cla ssified a»

w ildly distorted on the fir s t searing, tbs batten row shews tb s
rant er o f tr a its cla ssified ss s e ll adjusted on tbs f i r s t soaring,
lb s le ft hand asthma shoos tb s tra its cla ssified as sew srdy d is
turbed sa the second soaring!, the middle e d a * a h w ths t r a i t s
e lsssiilsd ss s&ldBy disturbed an the sssoad scoring and ths rig h t
hand 'iff— * shows the tra its cla ssified as w all adjusted on th e
seesnd scoring. A se* mains o f 1,192.987 for four degress of freedom
ahem the *elafclflBahlj» between the fir s t and second seoriag to be
reliable at a Isv sl greater than .01 which some to establish a suf
ficien tly high r elia b ility of searing.
However the data la table X seem worthy of mane careful
scrutiny# aa they shew rather d early ths adjustment statue of th is
s
■j&aafibeaj p » » y eq?. auqv BMsqqpwni s | sjreadd* j&Ksa*«a pe$Mdb» aqj
TO**Ê1JwpsuS «fa *s*P Zl£*g6t*Ts £*

«M BMSBtt
*w
w fArC «iiA fr%

u itr ) (6*SSZ5 (0*011) TW
ceC P« V W 8
(£ * 8 e) (r-m> (C‘S ) A p tth
o£S 101 r" i" n r*4

(8*0?) (S*£l) ip e ^ g
T S^B S?
«**&
wsm m
m i w w & m o w m m s «ws m jo straoos <d u r m m m
X SfW4
s»
I
1
i!
%
8 &a 3 * * I *
l!f Ills!
ad ju sted on th e f i r s t scoring 717 o f then ww® so c la s s ifie d on th e
second sco rin g . These fi# t r a i t s represent adjustment tlio four*
toon a ttitu d e s which i s d e fin ite ly id e n tifia b le as w ell adjusted# At
OS* cad o f th e group o f t r a i t s c la s s ifie d m m i l adjusted th s f i r s t
tis® la & frin g e o f 97 t r a i t s which are not so re ad ily id e n tifia b le
as e ith e r w ell adjusted e r iiaiMly dlsfcwfced* th is jsôfcably la a tru e
W fffw n ta tlaa o f th e adjustm ent o f th e students included in th e study#
I t should be noted th a t only th ree tim e in 14X4 Judgments m »
th e re a eoaplote re v e rsa l o f ogAnion on th e p a rt o f th e investigator#
Two o f the t r a i t s o rig in a lly c la s s ifie d as severely disturbed were
c la s s ifie d as w ell adjusted on th e second scoring and one of th e
t r a i t s c la s s ifie d as w ell adjusted m s classified . as severely d ie-
tubbed cn th e second sowing#
A ttention i s ca lled to the massing o f t r a i t s in th e lower r$#&
hand c e ll o f Table I# This i s doe to th e fa c t th a t the scoring
method devised fo r tid e t e s t dees not diffônfcl& te between th e mod*
e ra te ly w ell adjusted and th e ea&remely w all adjusted# I f mm were
to d arise an ineoBgdste sentence to s t sp e c ific a lly fo r use in select**
tn |p parsons fo r teach er train in g # i t is roM m nded th a t th e searing
BBtfeod devised should make provision fo r d iffe re n tia tin g between the
moderately w ell adjusted and th e very w ell adjusted#
Cenfcining th e l&L t r a i t s c la s s ifie d as severely disturbed m
both scorings* th e 330 t r a i t s ra te d as m ildly disturbed both tin e s
and th e 717 c la s s ifie d m both scorings as w ell adjusted* mm g ets a
to ta l o f 113S Judgments out o f 1414 th a t coincided m both ratings*
s®
Tmd Iw d n d o f tiw Judgnento ww* ehangnd ono dagroo on
ttw saeond searing and onijr throe mow changed twa degree*. These
date show ext acceptably h l£ i 2*vel o f r e lia b ility o f searing o f the
te s t.
S & asR ,W t M S » it***® *

advls&bla to e sta b lish whether th e re i» & difftom c* in
th e grades made in atudcmit«te&«hing fegr man and. woman* Bata to e s ta te
« po in t are jmeeetifeed in Table !!♦ Xn th is ta b le th e tmtibm
and percentage o f cam making &f B and C o r lo ss are shorn and th e
ekbb^sssp and. percent o f wssoon UMikstng A, B and C o r lo ss we® also re
corded* The difference in the percentage o f man and making A,
B and C o r le s s , re sp ectiv ely , are shown and c r itic a l ra tio s fo r th s
the c r itic a l r a tio of 1*3 for'
th s difference in th e percentage o f me** and women leaking A reveals
th a t th is d ifferen ce i s n et s ta tis tic a lly reliable* The c r itic a l
r a tio o f 1*6 fo r th s d ifferen ce in th e p ercen tag e o f mm end w arn
making B in d icates th a t th is difference Is relia b le at the *10 level*
This i s not s h i t le r sig n ific a n t difference bust does show tlia t in
general th e percentage o f women who make 8 w ill tend to he higher
than th e percentage o f men Who make B* Ten tim es in a hundred th is
difference »&$it be sispeeted to he ®er© o r reversed*
Ths percentage o f man Who make 0 o r tmm Is g reater than th e
percentage o f women who make th is grade and th is p r^ ab tlA ty Is a
p ra c tic a l c e rta in ty , as Is disclosed by a c r itic a l ra tio of 4*1*
|iH 3 3 3
\i a n
J •? «i 3
^ R & *.
I ©§
3
wt
%
W C!
% %
4 4
8I 5 o
k final point which it nomao dssir&bl© to establish
i boforo
ill
!i
I H
i
TABLS XXX
IN S'RnSEBIWrSA A8D POBBUBOCR 8*7X0
I
2.2 to 2.9 (28.2) (M .5)
43 37 0 10
1*5 to 2.1 (74.7) (© .4 ) (27.7)
34 77 %
.30 to 1.4 (79*9)
m wMniraae
33
ing grades*
2h Tams IV are data showing th e re la tio n sh ip between th e p o in t-
hour ra tio s and th e student-teaching grade fo r the 160 men* Hie data
in Table I f produce a x? value o f 6*542 which fo r 4 degrees o f trm**
den shows th a t P lie s between *20 and *10* This makes m anifest a
p o sitiv e co rrelatio n between point-hour ra tio and student-teaching
grade fo r the men but i t i s re la tiv e ly low*
Data in Table ? present th e re la tio n sh ip between point-hour
ra tio and student-teaching grade fo r th e 293 women* The value o f a?
i s 20*613 *&ich fo r fo u r degrees o f freedom is sig n ifican t a t a le v e l
higher than *01* This shows a sig n ific a n tly high positiv e co rrelatio n
bet ween grade and paint-hour ra tio fo r th e werasii* This evidence tends
to support th e p o sitio n of those in s titu tio n s which use proficiency
in academic and professional courses as a b asis fo r admission to
student-teaching* I t appears th a t th e burden of proof d e fin ite ly
re s ts w ith those who contend th a t other bases m ist be found fo r ad
mission to teaching In order to Insure a more adequate program o f
selection* The evidence is p a rtic u la rly strong in the case o f the
women*
A ttitude Toward Colleagues And 8ex* Data in Table VI show the

re la tio n sh ip between th e students • a ttitu d e toward th e ir colleagues
and th e sex o f the student*
In considering the data fo r th e men i t w ill be noted th a t the
observed frequency of th e severely disturbed and m ildly disturbed men
‘Jtoam iM t} paw eeqe atR ©*«fB »s«3$sm s£ arastSSe &ue*Sa*? pa^wx&s sqj,
o r v** o r «a«ei«* « « it * ir » ^ ts s * f •
cm rtn e e 1
OT 12 &
($% t)
Tt © * l
ere) <C**> m ) 6*2 ®* 2*2
*SEEpI
(m at)
oim anc»w«iod aw ©HnmMgams nr smrao mwosb dHE®iinaH
at am i
35
&
OEUTIOHSHIP BETfSSW ®AEE IK 3TtJDS3JT-TSACKIR3 AND POItff-HCOa KATIO
tO. CK M
ste s*s $
ti
!
.s
A*
<*V
«a» Ch**
«w*
**
tt
a
O'
*1
H
fj 3 s
a
$ $ 5 »
CM US
« @ j
CM A *ll
T
ABL
E TI
36
37
i s g re a te r than would be expected on th e b asis of chance and the
observed frequency fo r th e w ell adjusted men is le s s than th e expected
frequency In th is category* th is in d icates th a t th ere Is a tendency
fo r the men to be more poorly adjusted in th e ir a ttitu d e than would
bo expected I f the d istrib u tio n were on a mere chance b a sis, the
opposite tren d w ill be noted fo r the women w ith th e observed fre -
queasy o f disturbed being le s s than the expected frequency and the
observed frequency of w ell adjusted exceeding the expected frequency.
The x2 value o f «&24 fo r 2 degrees o f freedom lo cates P between ,50
and *30 which i s net sig n ific a n tly high* these d ata show th a t th ere
i s a tendency fo r men to have a poorer adjustment in th e ir a ttitu d e
toward colleagues than women* but th e difference is not s ta tis tic a lly
sig n ifican t*
A ttitude Toward Colleaguea Jgg Grade jn StudgnWTeaching*

Table VII presents data showing th e relatio n sh ip between the stu d en ts1
a ttitu d e toward colleagues and the grade In student-teaching fo r men
and women combined. Is th ere a p o sitiv e relatio n sh ip between the
scores on th is section of th e te s t and success in student-teaching?
A s u ffic ie n tly high co rrelatio n would ind icate th a t th e te s t might
be adm inistered p rio r to admission and help in selectin g those who
would succeed. An examination o f these data discloses th a t th e num
ber o f severely and ndldly disturbed students who mads A is le ss than
expectancy, i f the n u ll hypothesis were operative in the distribution;
and th e number of w ell adjusted i s g reater than expectancy. In the
ICRSfOP BCT.---3EK JffiBH TOWARD COLM3UES AHI GRADE T2i
smm-messEua (ms m mm)
&
m
§
m
a
4I
0*
a*
H
$
39
S column the number o f severely disturbed is s lig h tly more than the
expected frequency and th e ivmher o f aild3y disturbed in s lig h tly less*
The masbcr o f moll adjusted la g re ater than the expected frequency*
In th e C o r lee* etfbam the observed frequency o f severely
disturbed i s s lig h tly higher than the expected frequency# th e ob
served frequency o f m ildly disturbed i s considerably higher than ex
pectancy* the observed frequency o f w ell adjusted i s sm aller than
w ild be expected on the b asis o f chance distribu tio n # these data
in dicate th at tim e is a tendency fo r th e dlstuxfesd students to make
fewer A*e and B*s and fo r th e w ell adjusted students to make more A*s
and B 's than would be expected by chance* More o f the disturbed
students tend to make C and fewer of th e w ell-adjusted tend to make
C than would be expected by chance* This tendency i s s ta tis tic a lly
relia b le between th e #05 and .02 levels*
In Table VUI data are presented to show th e re la tio n sh ip be
tween the attitu d e toward colleagues and grade in student-teaching
fo r the aan# These data d isclo se that th ere i s p ra c tic a lly no re la
tionship between th is attitu d e and the student-teaching grade fo r
sen* The observed frequency does not vary g reatly from th e expected
frequency in any c e ll o f th e table* Hie x? value o f #572 fo r four
degrees of freedon shows th a t P llo s between «9& and *95 which in d i
cates th a t th ere i s no relationship between the two facto rs being
considered fo r the man#
Data in Table IX present fo r the women th e relatio n sh ip be
tween th e a ttitu d e toward colleagues and grade in student-teaching.
itO
41
««%
S?
BETtfEHf ATTXTUXE TOWARD CCUEAOfcS AIO OTJ1X XH
s$ si *•4w
*>
4<Hf
«§H
4
(X.
*i CM
it
*0
tfV
p4
f M
f** % m
■
y\
*v ,t)
r/
43
fts e * data i nd icat e th a t tb s nwfcsr o f ttstw fead « g m Mho mstda & an*
B i s lo ss than s l^ tb ho sspaetsd on tb s basla o f sm s ohaao*} while
t t s ausfeor of v e il adjusted who m/h» A and B i s g ro cter than fctas «s*
pasted fteqoMwgr* In tho 0 o r lo ss eoluran the number o f disturbed
eases aatcaede and th e number o f mbIX adjusted i s 3sas than a obsess
fraipiaauj • Thus, aamtg tfaa wwaaa stu d en ts, favor o f these te e are
dlotltfbed ill tbalr toward ^ liftgnaa ttffflH*? fcen analm*. hlnli
grades and aw * o f those who are w all adjusted In th is a ttitu d e tend

to antes high i n t e t than wsiM ho expected by oteRW* Mwt o f tin
U s te r M m a m tend to u t e Im grade* than would ho expected tgr
Aanfltt <md f«MP o f feh* n o il odtm tod *w«h oiateBa A w in* n f
15.723 ftp s* alth tee 4pi *hfTTftff of ffeoodsn In th ie shosr th is
tendency to ho *b1ly
t e th e b asis o f d ata in Tables VJ, VUt Vm . and U ena n r
eenolndft that!
1* Thors i s a tendency fo r wonsn# disturbed In th o ir a ttitu d e
toward edllseguesf to aafee lower grades In student^teachiog and fo r
n a il adjusted woman to nsko higher gr&deef and th is tendency In
fA*fe4 ftaii y reliab le*
2* Thors i s no a ig n lf lean t re la tio n sh ip between th e mm'B
a ttitu d e toward th e ir colleagues and the grades which they notes in
student-teaching*
3 # There i s a s lig h tly g re a te r tendency fo r men to be dis
turbed In th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e ir colleagues than w arn but th is
tendency is not s ta tis tic a lly reliab le*
43
A ttitude Om A M lltle© * Table X co n tain s d a ta concern-
dag th e re la tio n s h ip between the student©* sex ©ad th e ir a ttitu d e
tsw ard th e ir cam a b ilitie s * Are e ith e r men o r wwssan more d istu rb e d
than th e other in th e ir attitu d e © tow ard th e ir own a b ility ? When
th ese data are arranged in to th e contingency ta b le and observed
el© eely i t may be seen th a t th e women ten d to show a g re a te r f r e
quency e f disturbance m th is a ttitu d e th a n would be expected from
a ehanee d istrib u tio n * This i s seem by comparing th e observed f r e
quency w ith th e frequency th a t would be expected I f i t were a chance
d is trib u tio n (shewn in th e parentheses). The o p p o site 1© tr u e fo r
th e men. cn a c tu a l computation o f th e c o rre la tio n th e re i s found a
tendency fo r women to be mere disturbed in t h e i r a ttitu d e tow ard
th»lr m b nblM M w than nan. A *? ralu o o f 16,613 fo r 2 dograw
o f freedom* as in t h i s table* shows t h i s tendency to be s ig n ific a n t
a t a le v e l g re ater than *01*
Data In fa b le XX shear th e re la tio n sh ip between th e stu d en ts*
a ttitu d e toward th e ir own a b ilitie s and grades in student-teaching
fo r th e sen and women combined* In general th ere i s a tendency f o r
th e number o f disturbed who made A to be le ss th an expected on th e
b asis o f mere chance* and fo r the nunfrer o f w e ll ad ju sted who made
A to be g re ater than th e expected frequency. The exception to th is
txwnd is th a t th e number o f severely disturbed i s © lightly in excess
o f th e expected frequency* Xn ta b le XI* B seems to be th e p iv o tal
grade- th ere i s a tendency fo r more of the d istu rb e d to make B than
would be expected by chance and fewer o f the w ell a d ju ste d to make B
TGWA&B Q ffl
44
TABUS XI
ATmUIffi TOWARD OHS ABHJTIS3 AND GRAIB HI
snnsBTwrnaasa (hbh akd homs)
asm
. <<M«ww>w^<^MwwGrsds i s8Sw
MMiatfwartflS û^nU <Su^dii£
jagwj«8WMhMMasa8Bg8BB»M'i 11—
n i. ,
Attitude T ow d A B C or lasa
Om A hiH tie* tio. So. So. Totals
Severely (21,0) (23.1) (7.3)
Disturbed 25 ZL 6 52
Mildly (73*5) (& .1 )
Disturbed 56 50 36 112
Well (33.4) (97.6) (32.3)
_____________& ___________ M l - ________________m .
*2 * 13.227 df * 4 P lie s between .02 and .01

Th« exacted ffe ^ n c y appears in parestb&ses above fcfee o N m d freqae&ey*
3
1I j
general tm id
u J »■>
; 11 i
1M» mm
f i
|ji!" S
" hi
ii m i
ds i l l 1
%
i
«r
8 11
i % §I1
TABLE XZZ
RELATIONSHIP BEIHBBH ATTITBD8 TOWARD QMS A

ahd oraeb m s m m - m n m m (m s)
U 9 B * i& ja £ H S sa ie
A ttitude T ear* " " 'i " ( f 'f f i t t l
UBi, £ Tefcala
^ « S f^ (2.1) (2.3) (1.4)
1 3 2 6
m idljr (22.8) (24.8) (15.3)
wu (32.9) (35.8) (2 2 0 )
Adjusted 36 _______ 3 6 .............. 13 ..................... m . ............
m a le ______ A _____ _ a ------------ _______ 3 9 ------------ ........ 160
a? a 1.098 df = 4 P lie s between ,90 and ,80
ffeStSBflBifiESr iS^B®683PS ^39t flflf flSlflSKPIflftd

TABLE X m
8SLmON3HIP BSTi'HBJ AITITOEE TOWARD (Ml ABILITIES
AND < m m IB 3TUDEKT-TEACHISO (WCKEB)
Grade in Stadent-Teachin*
Ittitu d s Xoiroisl A . ... 8 .-... £' a t lam
Qm m u tie a So* Tetala
Severely (19.6) (21.8) (4 .5 )
m iaiy (50.7) (56.4) (U .7 )
^ e ll (54.6) (60.7) (12.6)
M & sted 66 .......... 55 _..................... 7 128
Totals __ _____ 322.......... ..._ J 2 _______ ___ ____S22L -
X1* 14.860 df * 4 P is greater than .01

'Hie expected frequency appears is parentheses above the observed frequency.
m
wwwn s&o stake C or lam * A a? value a t 14»g&0 for Hour degree© of
freedom shorn this tendency to ho reliable «b 4 level greater than
*01* On the basis of these data it stay bo eosioludod that la ganar&X
women who are disturbed in their attitude toward their am abilities
tend to make lower grades and otki well adjusted in -this attitude
tend to make higher grade© in student-teaching* This tendency is
s ta tis tic a lly reliable*
A ttitude Toward The Fast* Bata la Table XX? indicate the

relation sh ip between attitu d e toward the past and th e sex o f the
student* An examination o f th ese data reveals that the nusfcer o f
disturbed am exceeds the expected frequency and the number o f w ell
adjusted is le e s than would be expected. The opposite trend Is seen
saang the w m > The number o f disturbed w m is Isas than the ex-
posted number and the tmfcer o f w ell adjusted woman Is greater than
would be expected* A x? value of 15*235 for two degrees o f freedom
shews th at P i s greater than •01, Cn the b asis o f these data one
nay conclude th at woman are b etter adjusted In th eir attitu d e toward
the past than om and th at the difference is s ta tis tic a lly si^ iifica n t*
In Table XV is presented the relationship between attitude
toward the past and the student-teaching grade for men and wusaen
ccs&lned. In studying the data in Table XV it la difficult to detect
any d efin ite trend* Probably the m m t d efin ite tendency is seen in
the C or le e s column d e w the number o f severely disturbed la con
s id e r a b ly larger than the impacted nmdber* This seems to indicate
a
*£tmenbajjr paajeeqo a&oqs a e s a q p u s t of cucaMs Assm itaaf psâdfea
IB* iwq* je p u S V f d 2s » SCTSt s g*
------- ------------ m -----------
— S T "’------------- ST*P4
1 iss " ,T ' 1r isx T #' PW M
(6*9et) (onwt) tw
m 98 85 p«vnrt*ra
(ra ) (ro5) •fitPTW
oz 9 91 psqjit^spg
(6*ZI) (0*4) jtg&msg
'— ■ * “ “ 9^ «g
{u»M£ «p*?ro?
Tgg djjv isifd « a
awrm wtmur a imamm lamm dnmozxrm
m rm i
<8
3»
3a 3
to
!« S3
> t*4 e**
2
tfkin
^ *3 ^3 S
Vtir
t* <N
m
th a t persons d iB tu iM l a th e ir a ttitu d e toward the w ill toad to
aato lower grades la student-teachin^. A as? y&Xm o f 7*406 in th is
ta b le w ith It® four degrees o f freedom discloses th a t P lie s botweeti
•20 and *10* On th is b a s is , th e conclusion ®mm w ^ranted th a t there
i s a s lig h t re la tio n sh ip between a ttitu d e toward the past and grade
In studeat-teaohing but the re la tio n sh ip Is not highly e l^ iiflc a n t.
In Table X7X data are presented eonreraing th e relatio n sh ip
between th e a ttitu d e o f th s sen toward the p ast and th e ir grads in
studenfc-teacidng. 3h th is ta b le , a *? i t h s o f 3 * ^ 1 w ith four de
grees o f freedom shews th a t P l ie s between .50 and #30* This in d i
cates w sy l i t t l e re la tio n sh ip between the a ttitu d e of the sen toward
th e p ast and th e ir grads In student-teaching*
Table X92X contains data on th e re la tio n sh ip between the
wnonn*n a ttitu d e t a m d th e p ast and th e ir grade in
The ac2 ra in s o f 2.081 fo r fo u r degrees o f freedom gives F lying be**
tween *BO and .7 0 , in d icatin g l i t t l e i f any rela tio n sh ip between th e
semen9a a ttitu d e toward th e p ast and th e ir stndent-teaoM ng grade#
A ttitude Toward The Future* Data in Table XVIII in d icate

th a t in general store m a are disturbed in th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e
fu tu re than cm would expect from chance and fewer are w©ll adjusted.
Of th e woznen* fewer are disturbed and more w ell adjusted than would
be expected. A x? n oire o f 6.340 fo r two degress of freedom dis~
closes th a t P l i r e between #05 and #02. This supports th e conclusion
th a t th ere i s a tendency fo r men to be more disturbed in th e ir
TABLE XVI
BsurxoR aop bbwbbb attitude tombs the past

AJJD QRAEE » STBEBSMEAC81BG (MSB)
.......Grade in 3tudwt-Te«chiiut ................

A ttitude Toward k _ j l ~:.. C flr lp s i
M i. ' & to ta ls
Severely (5.0) (5 .5 ) (3 4 )
3 4 7 14
Mildly (z u e ) (22.8) (14.1)
SUiertwrf a 25 32 58
Well (31.9) (3 4 4 ) (2 1. 4 )
Adjusted ______ ....... ..3 4 ....... . ,....,__-34-_______ _ 20 88
Totals tat ..-....... - i t - ........ ISO
x2 * 3.881 df » 4 P lie s between .50 mi .30

The expected frequency appears in parentheses above the observed frequency.
54
NO «sj
PAst
IA 0
*0 aSÔ e?
«S5
urn
o
reMm
S %
1
mmm
*7^ 3
m <0 fr- *"!^
*J«* cSon *A
W <?N
1
I
°* a
•I 1A vO
c**# S'
W
•#
H
«
1 fS
n
i I ** I
TABLE x m i
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADJOSTOOT 18 ATTITUm TOWARD

th e n m m m SKI
Attitude Toward —a g .___________

The Future Wtmmtn Total*
Severely (1.4) (2 .5 )
Disturbed 1 3 4
m idly (ao.8) (38.1)
Disturbed 30 29 59
MU (337.7) (252.2)
Adjusted 129 261 . - - 39Q
Totals ISO 221— 453____
3? » 6*3AO df « 2 p lie s b e t m *05 sod *02

Bid expected fre<|S8ncy appears in parentheses above the observe treqamcy*
attitude tsward the future than memu Ib l» t endeaegr 1* re lia b le
$
1
3
*4
8
Q
I If I
i
h
I
8
Hi!! i
1 1 I$
%
§f
!
TABLE XIX
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATOTOTE TOWARD THE EOTIBS

AMD ®AEE IN $TOI®rr-TBAC8IBB (MSN AND WOKEN)
wsaxsmmm wBBxamm
Attitude fsward c or ittf t

The Future fe» Totals
Severely (1.6) (1.7) ( .6 )
Disturbed 2 2 0 4
(23.8) (26.3) (8 .8 )
Well (357.5) (173.9) (58.5)
366
mSStMM J g ..... .J L _______ ___ 390
M ,
x? S 4.759 df = 4 2 3 in betwwa .50 and .33

The expected freqaeooy appears In parentheses above the observed frequency.
58
H O M
rni
<1 «*>
M O fi^Q
k
n #**
11
&«
cj «J r*
w ° 3» s*3 **>
$4 M
«Q t>*
M\
•#
t* &
II
f*
1 4
M
a! 2» • If
59
*r> *»■*%
2° b 3$ %
icw«d the f
m vm z
d-"* d***ll
a* S> DO
in ft
» a
w «$ r4
3 §
H
wmm
a
a
3,
asLATiwsaxp
0* «H
it w n «n
jUj 4 #* sia in »
•#
II
§
lif h
i %I
m
iter 4 degrees o f freedom x m t l i th a t P lie s below th® *99 le v e l,
in d icatin g th a t fo r woman th ere i s no re la tio n sh ip a t a l l between
th o se to o h e t e s *
A ttitude Toward floors* Bata in Table XXII show tho re la tio n

sh ip between tho students* mm. mad th e ir a ttitu d e toward fears* In
general th e re i s a tendency fo r fewer o f th e xaon to he dSstuihed in
th is a ttitu d e and fo r oar* o f them to be w ell adjusted than would
be expected by chance* Tho opposite i s tru e among th e women* There
I s a s lig h t tendency fo r more o f them to be disturbed and im am o f
them to be w ell adjusted than might be expected by chance. A s?
value o f 5*36? fb r 2 degrees o f freedom shows th is tendency to be
re lia b le a t a le v e l between *10 and *05* Thus th e conclusion ap
pears w arranted th a t th e re i s a a lig h t tendency fo r woman to be more
fe a rfu l than mm but th e tendency i s not highly reliab le*
2h Table x m l th e data present th e re la tio n sh ip between th e
a ttitu d e toward fe a rs and th e grads earned in student-teaching fo r
th e s a tir e group, both m m end women* In each c e ll o f th e ta b le the
Observed frequemgr doss not vary g re atly from the expected frequency.
Tbs x2 value o f *574 fo r 4 degrees o f freedom show® P lying between
*90 and *95# suggesting no rela tio n sh ip between the a ttitu d e tow ard
fe a rs and th e grade In student-teaching.
A ttitude Toward Q uill &i fab le XXX? data are pre

sented to explain th e relatio n sh ip between th e stud ents9 a ttitu d e
tow ard g u ilt-fe e lin g * and th e sex o f the stu d en t. There may be
TABLE im
RELATIONSHIP BSTWEBH ADJtOTKEHT 2B ATTITOTE TCWA8D
mss ahd sex
Attitude
2s£s3&.
Severely (68*8) (126*1)
D istorted 61 134 19$
Mildly (36*8) (159*1)
B istorted 91 155 246
« 1 (4.2) (7.7)
M iastad 8 4 12
a? « 5*36? df * 2 P lie s between .10 and .05

table xnn*
HELATXaBSKIP BST'.’EEH ATTITOEB TOTAHB FBAB3 AHD
GRASS IB STOKOT-TSACttDIG (HER AHD K0MK8)
Grade la Student-Teacbln*
Attitude _ A„ B C o r lo ss
so#, Mb M sl&
S#we3y (78.7) (86.9) (29.2)
DiatuHsed n 83 32 195
Mildly (99.3) (309.6) (36.9)
Disturbed 103 109 34 246
&eU (4.8) (5.3) (1.8)
Adjusted ...... ........5 ............ .............5 ................ . _ 2 12
to ta ls .......... M S-...... 202 68 — -MDL____
*2 * .574 « *4 p H es between .98 and .9$

The expected frequency appears In parentheses above the observed freijusney.
63
mm mmm si w m m m mmm < m sm u rm
64
observed th e ta b le & s lig h t tendency fear f© w o f tho wnst to
be d is tu r b s and ragra o f tbam to to w ell adjusted and fo r mere of
th© wcman to bo disturbed and fewer w ell adjusted thou would bo era*
pee&ed by chance* A a£ 00X00 o f §*&&? fo r $ degrees o f f f e o t e
rev eals th is Oiflferaas* to bo re lia b le a t a le v e l between *10 and
*Q5* Thee© d ata w arrant th e conclusion th a t in general w m m tend
to bo msra distu rb ed lor guA li-feelings than mem but th e difference
i s n et a highly re lia b le one.
th e d ata in Table XI? in d icate a general tendency fo r ra re
o f th e d ista ste d and fewer o f th e r a i l adjusted to rake A then would
do wypccvwi »y enanes* jsi one s eoraam rawer o* une severely oaus*"
W * AW MMAa A I h m T w UB J K M .X iH .M H M A lM iiiiW k fe d*dP St'PrhjTB- f lA iS -tt.
turbed b ut aa ra o f th e m ildly disturbed and w all adjusted m&m 3

Uimi -MBiiiii k* eamected by chance* 2kt th e G o r i.tn» number
o f sev erely d istu rb ed i s g re a te r than th e eggwesfeed frequency and th e
am ber o f w ildly dlstwstoed i s le s s than aspected* The uesiier o f
w ell adjusted i s g re a te r than th e expected frequency* The relation**
sh ip between these fa c to rs i s re lia b le a t a le v e l between #30 end
*10 ldiich indicate® th a t i t i s not very sig n ific a n t s ta tis tic a lly *
Being disturbed in one*a a ttitu d e toward guilt-feelA ngs sm m to be
a fa c to r associated mere frequently w ith a b e tte r grads In ©tudont-
ts&ehtGg w hile a w ell adjusted a ttitu d e i s associated more frequently
w ith a poorer grads* However th is tendency i s not highly re lia b le .
la titu d e Tawartf Goals* From Table XTO i t m y be concluded

in general th a t women tend to bo b e tto r adjusted in th e ir a ttitu d e
toward th e ir goals than do ram# This tendency i s re lia b le a t a le v e l
TABUS m
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATTITUDE TOWARD GUIIT-FKU8QS
AND m m IN STUMT-TEACHING (HER AND WOKEN)
M
Attltada Toward SLM
S s63&JBb 5&i&3w» No. HO. Totala
Severely <75-93 (83.8) (28.2)
Disturbed 78 77 3? m
Mildly ClflO.9) (151.4) (37.5)
Iftsturfeed 103 30 250
aqU (6. 6) (2.2)

S 15
& 68
a? £ 7*393 df ^ 4 p u $8 between *30 and *10

1&* expected frequency ap pear in parentheses above the observed frequency*
TABLE a n
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADJUSTMENT IN ATTITUDE TOWARD
GOALS AND SEX
Attitude 3*x
Toward Goals " ""Him “ tfeaae Totals
Severely (3-8) (7a)

Disturbed 3 6 11
Kll<Oy (28.2) (51.7)
Disturbed 35 45 80
Well (127.8) (234a)
Adjusted 122 240 362
Totals 160 293 453_______
x2 = 2*53S df » 2 P lie s between *20 mid .10

between .20 m& .30 which la not hifi-hly sig n ifies* * ..
Table x s ta m e ta lm d tta showing th e re la tio n eh lp between
a ttitu d e toward goals and geade la stu d en t-teach in g . Xn th e &
ooluon th e rascber o f d istu rb ed eases la 3am than th e egpaebed fr e -
cpwinay and th e aasfeer o f m i l ad ju sted individual* is great*** than
th e eegoeted a m b er. In th e B s e to n th e ounbor of disturbed cases
3s g re a te r sad th e nuaber o f w all ad ju sted i s la s s than would fas
asp ected. th is s o * tre n d I s m m la th e c « r le e s sd as. A r?
wains o f 6.758 fa r 4 degress o f froedoe show th a t P lie s between
th e .20 and *30 le v e l. Xt way be concluded th a t stud ents who are
dlH uflw d $m th sd ? tvfffffynl gfftti.fi ffifffe** J^swwp
gmtulmm. «K£Hl H$t0 SSS *”*^1 &d^$3X8&4fr(l IfclSKKi If#
1» no* Bd^jhSy jPwlJbsfctkltt#
«♦*«*»«» Toward ftffUnds. Data la Table SOTH in d icate th a t

la g en eral wsnen are b e tte r adjusted la th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e ir
frie n d s than m b sad th is d if f ereno* la re lia b le a t a le v e l between
•05 and .0 2 . These dsfca w arrant th e oenelanien th a t wanna are b e tte r
ad ju sted in th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e ir frie n d s and th is d ifferen ce
I s g re a t eaeogi to be oansldarsd f a ir ly sig n ific a n t.
In Table OTX d ata are presented to rev eal th e re la tio n sliip
botween th e a ttitu d e tow ard frien d s and th e atudant-taaohing grads
te r m b and woaan M ttin e d . These d ate in d icate l i t t l e d ifference
between th e observed freqpsna? and th e otqpeeted frequency in each
s e ll o f th e ta b le . A a? value o f 1.391 fo r 4 degrees o f fneeden
$
psiu&sq© m{% s»Aoq^ irf tureeddte j&oenbaaj p©^s#d^» my,
O f ?v® 02* s®Tt <1 ^ = JP 2&*9 s ft
.... " 89 202 ^ E8T
296 aST St Ux
(e*w ) (9*T9t) (2*991) T O
08 « T9 52 peqaassrsa
(0*CT) (9*55) (£*25)
n 2 8
(9'D (6*9) (9*9) £ta*a&&£
"stSÔi . ^ ........
’ os 8tS« p»WBi
tfWJ So 0 a 9 w nw
aapiDsaj-vwpnqs « j apu g
(miQ& m &aw) o ra o m -isa aaL s n i s a w
amr styod asm?* m m m m s (Jihcsoixvtsh
m xx sf$sv«l
7ABZE X X ?ni
relationship bbwsen kumsmtm m mmm toward

FRIENDS AND SEX
A ttitude Tosard (Hr

Friends Hk -r)S !W r.ii
Severely (3.6) (7a)
Disturbed 1 10 11
Mildly (61.4) (112. 5)
Disturbed 73 im 174
H ell (94.6) (173*3)
Adjusted 26 122 268
Tafcala 160 29J3 453
I2 * 6,364 df * 2 P lie s betw en .05 and .02

The es$ect@d frequency appears in parentheses above the observed frequency*
■jSsuenbajj pauaaqo s i r e*o«[B osewRBWWi 05 a te adds A m anbajj po'padsre my;
08* P*» 06* a " « W s a rt d *! z 3P T6£*T s j*
89
cST 8Tt
(8*09) (S*6Tt) (8*80t) Tl«M
96t 68 66 89
(1*98) is * m (8 *06) APTBS
It e 5 C P*V«98Ta
(9*1) (6*9) (9*9) jEpMUE
ifSfBS SpSB T E SSJ
a «m w w
Hirpiisoi-VM pnê sp«*o
(m >A aw saw) {MHovsiîijaaois h i sqvsd
<m ew m awma acuuxuy assists
xza sm u
i*
i
Is
i %i
I 1 I: I1
i
the wU ease® are tiwm than In th* c oar X&m

*j&m©nbswj paiurasqe ©A©qe s©e©tftEea$d u | eoi?sddte J&raai&a^j p©$s«lxa ©ty,
OS* P«* 06* 09««W ^ f t d *? • *p 6T£*£ * ^
--------- -
m 6£I &t
a r t' Si 06 11 r " ZJ
Ou ' P*^M’P¥
(0*8T) (6*98) ir m TWR
IOC IT 99 & peM nvpi
(6*6) (6*i9) (0*69) •*tPTTi<
01 Z 5 £ paqjm^BK!
(6* ) (6*9) (8*9) JF£3J©A©£
w w m •^8 ■*8f spasp4£ P*»tofii
B |1 5 8 ? &p*%VWi
fcu|>ia»»&-y»pn^g h i apiuD
(mswdm) a r a o m - jr a m is m m v m
am m m u m m i m a m s* m m s m m u r w
XXX snavi
TABU sax
relationship m w sm Armans toward friends and
GRADE IN 3TUDENT-TEACKIHG (MEN)
In Student-Teaching
A ttitude A , . . . . » .... L .a U s g » .
FSriends M&Se yp.
Severely ( *3) ( . 3) ( #2)
Disturbed 0 0 1 1
m i€& (26*4) (28.?) (1?*?)
Biaiurbed 24 33 16 73
v&n (3U1) (33.8) (20.9)
Adjusted ....................... 22 36
Totals m S3 ... 2 ....... ........... 160
x2 = 1.694 df = 4 P lie s between .80 and *70
Tha expected frequency appears in parentheses above the observed frequency.
it
TABLE S m
BKUTIONSHIP BBtHBBX ADJUSTMENT ZH ATTITUDE TOWARD

superiors abdsex
A ttitude Toward Sex

a g a te s ..li,,,. te te .
Sensreljr (10.9) (20.0)
Disturbed 14 17 31
m a iy (41.3) (75.6)
Disturbed 37 SO 117
M l (107.7) (197*2)
M Ssgtgd______________________________ 222_____________2 2 |_________________ 221
Tgfaflg 160 293 453
as? * 2*056 df • 2 P lie s between *5D m d *30

%
The expected frequency appears in parentheses above the observed froquencî
n
If
us «*>
S* a 8 M
*82f
ffJTiEa ATT1TUEE TOKAHD
R
i «
ft
•i 5 f rt S - •■
M
*» wa s s te
w r is
r«Crf
*
A
3
♦I ts csa
5 h cS H
H s r
«&
n
us
US
<A
t: w
** I
eetaasi th e re am s lig h tly Mere d istu rb ed in d iv id u als than th a m pset»
ed nm b** and s lig h tly f tw r «»11 ad ju sted titan would bo expected
b a t th e d iffe re n w s aye w ry s n a il. A a? w in e o f 3 ,# 5 ®*p A degrees
o f fro o ta a F to s b m m ,50 asad , 30, th is m m - may e<m$M o
th a t ther*© is a sMgfct f&r jsipo^ s d4#km%o4 4a ttw l* aifc*
titu d e taw ard am p h o ra to raak® Xowox* pmdoo in m&
t s t t&ooe noH &4juot*& 4a tId a attitude* to make highor gvodmi t a t
th is teo&K&y la ao t 8&grilf&£at£&,
Attitude t w i i a ta » M a a te ii« Safe* In T able S S 7 are" p ro *

aaoSod to 4 ssso to o to ShottsT tls® o 4a a ytyftftt f INytiniiflo sttS#*
t ls mm ospo 44o%iii$mmeI 4a ttS s 4^»t4tii4o #^4 §9sttst oeo w$4 o4JiiwtflF4

thafi s * wi,fl!t4<l by sflhtimfiBn FOf^P ©f thO tJfflflfflKI &$# d llltis to a
and n sre a re w ell ad ju sted than xm U be sM peetsd. A m3 veins o f
3.560 fo r 2 degrees o f f reodcaa rev eals t i n t P lie s between .20 and
.1 0 . i t nay be eendaded th a t th e re Is a teadfSMQr Oar women to he
b e tte r ad ju sted In th e ir a ttitu d e toward subordinates than wan. th is
t s t o i t y lo gpwwrfMMF t&sofi ohenee but is not highly re H a b ls.
Xd Table KXT d ate are presented to detew dne th e reisfcJUswilip
between the attitu d e toward subordinates and th e grade earned in
student-teaching bgr nan end women combined. There is a a li$ it te n
dency fo r fewer o f th e d istu rb ed t e mafce goad grwtee than would be
m d fo r wore o f tb s w ell adjusted t e nates seed grades than
be expected. The tre n d e ls e scows to be fo r m m aif th e
table raw
HEUTI0H3HIP BSIW5ES AWU3THSH7 ZH ATTITUDE TCWABD
SUBORDINATES AND 3EX
A ttitude Toward Seat

r.WpL— ™n T Tbtols
Severely (4.5) 0^5
Disturbed 2 n 33
Pdldly (39*5) (72.45
I&siurbed 4? 65 112
Well (115.8) (212.1)
A&iusted 111 , ........ 217 ...... . 328
T otals _ ----------- _________ - » — 453 ___
* 3.560 df » 2 ? 1199 between .20 and .30

Tbs expected frequency appears 3a parentheses above the observed frequency.
3
tabu m r
RELATIONSHIP BSTWEBH ATTITOEK TOWARD 3UB0RDISATE3
ARD GRABS M STODRST-TSACHISG (MEH ADD WCHSH)
^ . _ ----------- ,--------- frff# % ___ ___

A ttitude Toward A B C o r laaa
Total*
S*mn&y ($.2) (5 .7) (1.9)
?a«turt>«d 3 10 0 13
Mll<Oy (45.2) (49.9) (16.8)
'<«1 (132.5) (146.2) (49.2)
- ___________ m _____________m _____________ s l
m . m ______________&
s£ ■ 5.388 « * 4 P lie s bettwoo .30 and .20

The sh eeted frequency appear® In parentheses above the observed frequency.
t*
d istu rb ed stu dents W rafe© rad fewer o f ifo® i^slX
to mak* 2m gm dra* $© s«^^ is m&$r v^M ^ 0 a t *
2©to2. between tb s #3§ ra d #30 lev els# Thu® tb s ram toaim * i s ws*v
rooted th a t th e re i s s tradaneor fo r th© studrahs mm m il1 ad*
J«st©d isa th e ir a ttitu d e i< w d subordinates. to miss roX stitoi^r
high grodss in «&ttdm&~t©rahlag sad fa r those dlj&urbeid £a ilsi# ©&«»
tifcad© to note irelatira& ar 2 w groda®* ^^ ij§ tendsn©jjr i s g re e te r
t t e chaocs M i* agl b l S f n U iU if
la Tab!* X SSI tb s 4*ta indloato i M x r th aro I s any *«$*»,
tlra s b lp between tb s sttita d © o f tb s wsiara toward th e ir
and tb© grades tb ey «& * In sta to t^ tsa e h in g * i s a eery s lig h t
dr^MkJleMMlliS
w O Q O m s^
|©K
*© T w w
©t©&4lUMaidlF-©fetfA mrMiS'ir tAboari
TUfU.A. S S y M S S WOi I pS bB K I S O ISM fi© I i3 |p iiw r fpP StaS© 1 w lO
S&NUiMh
IS a r
tb s ddstsstisd ^f i11”^ to mb© Isw w {pfcde© h u t.tradraeijjp is n e t rsH sbiS e

b fetdbs XXKYW sr© ©rfra®§d iwhwily1^ wheth er th s rs
i s aagr w k tla m ih ip between th© a ttitu d e o f tb s n m toward ihe&r sdb*
agwdHnatea jwhI th e ©rods© d d d i th e ran in studsnt^toaeM nR#
th e re i s no re la tio n sh ip hetm an th ese tm fMfeaw*
A ttitude Toward Sfether* IM o in TiM o XSKWCIX &!t?*3 pa®9tt©feAlI

to ro v eal th« rsla tle n n h lp botwoon th® *tt±tu<fe> t«ss*B swfcljsr and sax.
A a lig h t tm d n u y I s dlaesm ablD fa r th e mm fc® b® b sb ter adjustod In
th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e ir rath er* than th e w » A si® m lue of
3 #O0SL fo r 2 degrees o f fpeedm j£m©a P h eim m *30 and ♦a©* Although
mm tra d to be sH #it3^r b e tte r adjusted in th e ir a ttitu d e toward
mother than ra ra a <2©# th e tra d ra e r is g re a te r than dfcano© but is not
?*s&£ m?x
mxmn mmm to im smmmms
relationship
m mAm nr stuobot^teacrinq {mm)
^ ttitu d s Toward jP " E g J jg g

Subordinates tte. " -£ z — ««■& M &
Severely (4.6) C5-2> (3-0)
Disturbed 2 9 0 U
Mildly (27.7) (30.8) (6.4)
(92.5) (102.9) (21-4)
_____23___ Jfflt ______ 20 ....._ .,.£ U L -.
3^ * 4*747 df 5 4 ? H as between *50 *30

* 4 8 pwuwsqo (Kft euioqe saesqyjajsd u t ueaddc Xsuanbajj psâscte® ety,
66* tBR» a n f i j < * * JP 9U0* *
jvn-nm.r.usmja.
yl> 85 ' M
m *? •Wtt
tn r ' '& 1 1* " p®*js®£pV
(0*i&) tt*er) (g*oar) ITO
« <rt 61 9t
(rot) (sin) (0*41)
e 0 1 1 P*PRWa
{if) a* > (4* ) £ga£9&dg
ifKpi MlJSn— ■ ...... ^ _J*_. «e$sirfp&Hpg
fiSffaS n! T T fwwwa t^ rn r
Sfrj^Msrqna^n^ at apwo
(83W) {M HOm-M KIUS S I 80V8D OSV
s a ir a a a o a n s a a v m i s a m m v sa tN isa -n H s s o iin s B
MM. iM M M IMMtfel '•
itAXXX ra n
ta bu nm n
hbutichsiip bktwsxh Awuawmnr m attitude tcward
IfOTHSR AND 3BX
A ttitude Toward
TotalB
Sew roly (10*2) (18.7)

D istorted 8 21 29
M ildly (37*7) (69.2)
Disturbed 32 75 107
Well (111.9) (205.0)
_____________________________ g g _____________ m __________________ m .
3? = 3.001 tf * i P lie s between .30 and ,20

The expected frequency appears to parentheses above the observed frecjteney.
i
8
I t tf
&
\S I
I
%
TABLE nwm t
RELATIONSHIP BSTMHW ATTITODS TOWARD MOTHER ASD

grade in s tm m jr s m a a (mh abd wcmbi)
Grade In
A ttituds T&mnl A d &P ^JMMI
1&>»L if e IfmijA Totals
Severely CU.7) (12.9) (4.3)

Disturbed 9 14 6 29
(43.2) (47.7) (16.0)
(128.0) (141.3) (47.5)
Mfegfcpd --------------- 128 142 „ A7____ __________ 317 ...
» 1.699 df « 4 t Mas between .SO and .70

The expected frequency appeare la parentheses above the observed frequency.
*
xm am m m &
• J t o a a i w j peuuesqo m o n p s a s m & p n a s i irj jMBSdtfe -Sauanbejg peâdxa eqj;
at* pirn oe» a**sqeq s®jt 4 fa ff f06*T ■
mmtmmmmmtmtm
7 ift
{C*f*5 (9 * « t) (m ) TOR
f it At if peqwifST^
(fit) a * ts ) (8*ff)
SC 8 *i ft psqan^spa
(2*S) (f*S t) ( ttt) £g&xe&s§
$wre#©i
mb
(MOM aw HSM) iMHDVSi-ilfflaiUG NX 33V^)
aw t m i c r m ia i a cra m x v f i n a l s msmurm
rm& xlh
HKUTIOKSHIP ABJUS1EOT 18 ATmCEE TOWARD
FAHJLX AMD SffiX
s»
Attitude Toward 3aae
(6.?) (12,2)
Disturbed 6 XL
(Iftai) ($2*3)
30 5*
Well ( m .6 ) (22M )
■ i m . im h
122 n.p— i, i,n i ......................
231 ......
m ln s o f *555 fo r % degrees o f freedoa* shows th a t IP 3Jm between *B0
and *?0* Qd th® b asis o f th ese data em staay ©enelude tlm t th ere is
no re lia b le re la tio n slilp between a ttitu d e toward f& sdly m *I sesc®
The d ata in Table m ill are arranged to ixkttoato n 3 lftk k »
sh ips* i f any* between th e a ttitu d e tow ard iM U br end th e g rad s in
studentîeaching* Thee* i s no re lia b le a^latdonshlp bafomm th ese
te e footers*
njH ie» * s^ e nBo fa n Tm iM iSftarik litfittM M fb

^Tbe
jggJHr' an iio it iWf T l f
juuiv dfeBfeaa it&etdtae
■■ nîni rtm rfiia itf
m e sam ere arranges
the
^ feint ImiiifilTi hsbweoti attitude
^ v w w n p p toward and
^ v^*(nwn®pii,l ^ iw pw w
ppt ****#-
ewwwwmjF
Mere o f th e a n are i l t t n M In th in a ttitu d e and fewer are w ell

ad ju sted th an would be eapeefced lay chance* Power o f th e mm m ere
d istu rb ed and m m a re w all ad ju sted then m xId be e®$*sfcsd a m a
chans* dtetttlfea&lea* A 3? i n t o o f 2«97& fo r 2 degree®
lo c a te s P between *30 and *20* Haas i t nay be concluded th a t mmm
are le s s d istu rb ed in th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e ir m am than nan
are* T his tendency ia g re a te r than chance b at Is m& highly re liab le*
Data in Table XtV shew th e re la tio n sh ip between a ttitu d e toward
mmm and etBdentwteaohing grade* In th e A colum i t w ill be seen
th a t m e msrfcer o f d istu rb ed eases is le a s than th e ©xpeerted fee**
qusnsy and th e nusber o f w ell ad ju sted oases la tmm* In th e B eeCU
m t* in general* th e d istu rb ed eases em eed th e easpeeted fr®<|iaasiey
and th e w ell ad ju sted eases mm le s s than escpeebed* Ib is easts tren d
is m m in ih a 0 o r le s s celuam. ChiHepare i s 9*194 in d ieatin g th a t
th is tendency is re lia b le between th e *10 smd *05 lam ls* The
elusion is w arranted m at th ere is a tendency fo r students disturbed
TABLS lU n
m u m m m m m m m m m m m w m ax m
m m m ssvMWEAsras {w m m m m )
ifckituie Toward
T otals
SareM y (7.6) C2-8>

Dlstia-bed 5 30 4 If
(32.7) C3M )
Bistujbed 33 34 14 a
MX (1*2, 6) {157.4}
J M . ___
affwawwa 208
s? * 1*263 df * 4 F lie s bet'^sen .90 and .SO

The a^M U d flrequawgr appears la parentheses above the observed frsqaaaey.
tm m x u v
m nm m m m m n m m m m m m v
m m m nm
A ttitude Toward
..-IS'1 ""
Severely (?.?) (34*2)
m stofeed u U 22
mM& (77.3) (343*8)
Disturbed 88 339 239
Ml (74.8) ttsra)
M lssted w J43 232
Tofcaia —r----- 160 453
30 * 2*97$ M * Z f 2£@s beI m *3$ m l
The e je c te d ffceâsnsr appears in parentheses above th e abs©rv©d f&&p@ii€r*
«
<g&
St I
I.
II
I a* * 3 & 8
n
* i
« «5 > O
njij * l\ S| 1
»»
B§ i s I
a
! f&* .3
IS \o
S **
It
&
.*
0*
i I
n
sa
"Xjtrfc *?« * %©
a^vxt'OQ© xtniaro w w n to wax® | p
f t A A *C «ul«taM iA tiania Mt-&H 1*i*iwtLlti*e ^ jMafeLA
$^&$o© in w&txisinwâ©©^^
iMHHiMili Jlt.flB.rtli imMAi H (j iflf f t r r t tli -A* ut4 ittt ival^h-*W'l¥fifc mir
®»d fo r tho®© w U &d$o*t*d In tM© a iiiiy d a to nafo higher

While tb lo tendency I© g re a te r than ebano© i t l» not $ highly olgoliw
ioa& t iendwaojr ©tatl©bi®a3%*
In Tafcl* XLVX d ata am m tg o d to di©©lo©o f a th e r th em I#
a re lia b le r ela tio n sh ip between th e a ttitu d e o f tho non toward
and th e grades aads h r th e m In otw tot«t© aehlng^ th ese d ata **k
s e e l th a t th e re In no © igslflo& ttt r**? batm en those tu n
f&eter©«
Data am arranged In th h lo X3OTS to iiidioai® && pom iblm re**
imiti inimi th e a ttitu d e o f tranagi toward <WiM a«ei. the- londas
which th ey safes In otudflrat-4;®a<aain^» ffcom Is no m lM iooalô b©~
iM
iH Hioisn
o ii tovpraPw
h i f t n ia
wewga f efwtew
s® B fe
iaiedTiêf “a i©
.
$
•toamSsaas psuuescp « « aaoqa ewwqtpiajwl s f ajewhJe jfoaBttbwj pe^n& e mq
05* Pas o€* HMKtwi « f | a 9 * IP *r£2 *£ s g*
SSttaam ass
------- |g -
tt IZ ps^sniVy
(8*9t) (x* m (o*ar) TW5
0t « s & w®ws
(S*6T) (SIC) (O'fiE) JEtpm
It 9 9 t p«|Sffi>S’Sa
(nr) m ) (6*0 Xi&n&ag
IP W . . . . ’•s _ 'Mr
-3lr-n
dd»t ia 9 . a '? "" T' iwwwi w w
apajî
mbs
( m ) o m s m - s s s a a is a mv©
am m m a m im x m m m m m a m m x rm
x n x ffn u
♦M
to
. . n m n f u m
“ irlij ji !«H & if? I ! f

r
§
H
96
I R I
♦
xas got OSVH sntawKiOt! mma diHosouraa
3 * 33
a id
*M*
is *
W $ £
W S*M
«
Os •*
d ri
3
ct tfs
d 8
s I
n
i
!
99
&
*»*
m g
Table U eacutiafee o f Out* to rev eal aay re la tio n eh lp th a t ss&ghfc
• H a t between th e a ttitu d e o f th e men toward th e ir swa s b iltU e a and
th e ir point-hoar ra tin e . In each n e ll o f th e tabl® the ebeonwd fm »
«MMgr v ariee only ellflh b ly fro® th e aspeeted ftw guanqr. A a? value
o f 1.168 fo r 4 degreea o f freedom bee P ly in g between *90 and .8 0 .
m ere ia no r a la tiera hlp between th e raen’e a ttitu d e toward th e ir met
flMtii ike4» eMjein^^JoeMaeo *e»&4.at«e ,
fab le t i l eooeieta e f date ehowing the re la tio n sh ip between

n w ' i attitu d e toward th eir east aM U tfoo end th eir petaM war
ra tio n , ia e—adnetiew o f th e data reweale th at in the h ifh eet
pgjj|te>hOW ZftttlO flyOlff th e 1$UEBSfa&&Of dM|^
m ry Im aot w ay different toarathe o&ttootodarmssSbmt*to tto
V ep W ^ ^ w B BBBeSr e o “ 8 (e^ B f nu^^pê^BWB^Beflp rj^ WwaeiPF^B *wip^r^MnBWu|||p89^
j M lM H tM i k S d fc A A J H ito b A te h A M t O ftim fe - i t f f jiiiA IB J n A da. ^ to d h ***! to ifttdra

g T w H y U W F Q 2 9 9 b w IQ B B ^ *«BT w if C ueS buT B vQ ©|SO©$l 9 0 HMt J w f m vJwsBt
9bA f w u n ll mUmifeftil t o t t o easjsoto*! ftooiiiSBOiSFt to th o
1onost group I t o to 9 teo to ao r fo r tto im ito r o f 4toto*to& &$§o* to

i m d oacpestoao? *a& fo r to m h*3£ totjusttoi to be toso to rn too m&»
peetod a a a to # The imtoo « f .a# to #«$$$ to ito fo r to o k dogrsss o f
freedom ia th is ta b le piaoto F totow m *05 aa& *€$* ftaft too Oto*
elu sio n is w arranted th a t amsag tm h to ato o iv ito im o o to toutotoos
ttor© to a tontoeear ffcr those toU . &43t*»to$ to to e ir a itito to tm m M
t& etr ews ab llitto © to earn Itighnr t m r a p m l fo r th&m dtotw rtod
to th is a ttitu d e to isttko tow ir mgrngss# fto |0 A t o i l i t r o f th to
tendency to Kifftotoxxk to to e m ito r to f a i r i r sig n ifican t*
A ttitu d e T oaatrd Past* to Tabl© m i to to o re a rr^ o g e d to

■m
* I
H ABILITIES
BSLATX0B3BZP BSKEKH miTOIS TOWAJQ CW
(m m )
8#
St
1 *
warn
I
•I «n <m
~ J si if $ :f ©
m> ra m & m
1
Pt
A*
il*
<>
« € * ***% > *^
S " % ©SI
«* *©!
t*»*
-4*
*
a
i |
:3 4 I
TAM* U l I
KEUfXCWaHlF BEW EBf ATMtUI* TOUARO TIE PAST

AND POIWMiC® RATIO (MSI AKD WHOM)
A ttitude Toward to 2*9 Sjfca'-SEiiC

if*. Totals
(3*0) (3.?)
3 9 8 m
m i& y (22. 2 ) (62.9)

MstwSmd 25 58 61 344
(44.6) (138.0) (326.3)
328
JO IfflOHSESi
# » 429 6f * 4 P » ,98
Tbs sspeefced ftetp aay appears in parentheses abwe th« ohssrasd frostiejicy,
m
di s c lose i f itaor* is « iral& iism M p beiva&en tb s isisitoA #1 aifcteuS®
t s w d th e p ast a n t Mm palnW rour ratio * &* sesh *»11 tC th s M S *
tin observ&d fre^sm esr and th e e je c te d «Wi ap p rfcsritm t^
th e ra n * Chi**e<2a&F® equals «43f «AMh tm 4 d$pw $ i f fawndflfi*
aaleee F eqpal te *9&* th ese &sfca sfcww th a t M g tm ^ iv t^ p aiase e.
e f I^ e is ia m th e re i s tie re la tio n sh ip heteeen th e a ttiM e U m x4
th e se a t eeint^hBUiH* m tie
e* ^ww^nee* seuapeiMt
#n*n nnsr*n®» eeeem eêieerereee^
fth le 1W i s mAe tse e f d&t& te rev eal eh eth er th e re is m r

gîâtgwwA^Yfc between th e e*^^seie
laWi*# a&Kfcffcirfit.
™w<wwpsts^^pra tesarS
WwfW*wpi eth
» » Se ea st eeeew
F 9Msswre^ sade th e tr
er^w-'O^ssie
«>i«fejiM>» re tia s* 3h eauah c e ll, ®£ th e th e &b@©rv&d fremiiaBusr

ana ese tmyaautn xrsôsixer
*h*e^9 ^ ta ^ h
e re
-tfhiiajaMmiMttaenMS Ajunah
issm.- eesis# aA jc*
t» «*u*«»tMteMMirttfiiwfcAA j^pI apt* ik<liuta
mmsm
teriffi «M iktiM tA
*agAA d^Mken A* ptâ^HMhtesa^n j s v vtlHiiiLâaftfliiaia eatajMhrfMNik A ta in h TS^*v*l.Aktffc %a^Mfe4uMaeine. tih rt A<ta4%

W ^ M /f * " if w B g r T O l S ir' St'W W JM U B u v m p w ilo iv 5 fciMWiff. «3w*»w®w* PwKi
*dO« Oe» th e ^M
><^ a e f jp to ^ ia yfyy may eeeeteie th a t th e re
I s a s re la tio n sh ip between th e mm*m a ttitu d e toward th e p ast and
tb a ir poin t-ho ar ra tio s*
Ib Tab!* v t debs ass arranged to In d icate th e re la tio n sh ip
between th e a ttitu d e o f th s wanna tew srd th e p ast and th e ir paint*
hour ra tio s ia courses tstesn p rio r to studw t-teaehto® . those date,
safes i t evident th a t thaw* I s a s re la tio n sh ip between thaws fa c to rs.
Table v a eentaiao isa ie rta l to attselose uhsther th ere i s «
reU tio M h ip between a ttitu d e toward th e fu tu re and paint-hour ra tio
to r max and wohki eestdnetf, la eoeh e e ll o f th e ta b le th e ofesarved
fretp»n«y sad th e eaqptoted eewpensgr «ra ®pja«adaBtely tit* sans* th e
Yfiw* a f *2 is 1.600 wfaieh tu r k d o n ees o f frasdoa shews th a t 9 lie s
bctTMSiwi *90 and .0 0 . thus i t r mm and weran eosfeiaed, Uwre is no
108
St ft
<*\
«St- 'M
I® *1
1*
?
Rt
12
£
*1
TABES
S«#«#*
** ~
W1 W1
I
«* 41
*£s
as <IK
£* •o22*'
#«l
*
&
3
i I
(SBQlO Gim WBSMBKRM(Ml
m a sh i m m w m x t a m ass m m sm m
*iSsBR&«g pH&eeqp au $ e aaawtpjaaxe& u j arsaciJe iwjsnbM j peâa&a am
08* fw* OS* awwifaq »TT 4 *t • J9 Q09*T »
« n m
(rami «w jbh) outs wm-moi m
m ta a i m , m m m m m m m m a m m u rm
u i sn sn
the attitude tewa*d the m ure and the potest-
a
i
11
I
%
1
1!
I
i
i
ftt& as$e « n m et# op sjbscM* Aa&echa^ vsqaaSm «&
OS* PW Qt* O M N ^ m r 4 * * jp x j r s c £c
sssa
■w
T
(8*8) iw .
oe *£ IP p*x*an®f3
ttW ) CTO ) (0*t) ÊPt®
i I 0 0 paqso^sps
(S* ) (C* ) (0) X pnus
W&fiBt “■ " " i s i s r w
piwwx o m m t
(oh) oisra wshhsm w
worn mi m m mauw mnm momxrm
ran raw
w#
TABUS LXX
msLmtmaf mam mmm toward psaib

and pcansmosm ratio ( mbs m mm)
AttttwSe Twepd ta .3 .0
4fg»r Totala
Samcs^r (30,1) (i m ) (35.2)
Disturbed 33 & 195
HlliSy C3S,e> (100.4) (W.» 2^6
Diafcurted » 112
a e ll (1.8) (4,9) (5*2)
. . . 6,.
10
a? « .926 df * 4 P Ifa s betw eo .95 «a« ,9 0

The expected freqaesKsy appiars fa peraftfaane above the cfeaerwd faeqaeney.
■■£3asnb&sj pauaaga eq* stage som & aaxai o$ azeackis ^suec&sjg ps^sa&a «&
06* pue a * w « « m a»TI 4 *1 * 3 P 2*0*1 * g*
tr
---------y ---------
9 % ’ 9
(A f) (A*2) {5* ) TW!
T6 IS 62 5 pagjagsw
(r« ) a*eo (2*9) ^SPOU
19 % 12 9 gagsssjrfa
{2*90 {5*02) ( tl)
^f*X *w» CB* 1*2 ^ 5*t 6*2 *4 2*2 P & m sm m m
OUVH T O i-M K M am
m u arnoi mmxm mmm m m m im
n rm i
TW & U X
8ELATI08SHIP BETHEBI ATTITUD8 TOSfAHD FEARS AHD

POffKP-HOUB RAlZO (NOHES)
!j«
41 I
1
I
I
s
I
In Table L.CT Che data are arranged to reveal any

1 I
W M\
a#
I I S
4K
&
1 *• *> HI, aI
«M
1 g fc w-
&» m
£
I *?
*«*
■3
«
I
«9
S
*»Ia
*
•iaam tM uj pauaaqo a/ioqe w «na«.w d xcf sssaddte .SsuauBajy paqaadie «&,
<35* pt*s Q4* v a m m « * n a * » JP 509*2 » g*
ssssbhssbmbsssssbb*
.....1 ogt ...... 11
„ ,r, g , p a n fry
§ m i " S "
{£*5) (o*C) (9* ) w
m m » * P*i®9®fa
(S*4t) <S*5) A ptw
u m w 4 paqatêps
{1*29) (6*€2) (®*t) £gfcS3&&S
mm W W H w n t
(khh) aura anQB-aajCM aw sonttsm
-iiuiD owmos s&uxuv *s»asa eUHSfourm
wan TSBxi
KMABB GQXLT-
KEUTIOHSHIP K5TVSEH ATOTUIS TOWARD GOALS
ABO POlHT-HOUa RATIO (MSB AM
D WOMM)
3°
I
i
w
^
la & a
Q*
48;
I
y -s
Hi
■w *.
JUS:
r*
<1 I
$ 4
$3
«#
a
a.
i a
*
? • !
5
US
129
th at »l#*t o ctet batw m a&tltuda toward gool* sad potoWwmr s*afcie
fd r aw ead m n M ebined. In mc& e«H o f the tab le the dbeeraed
ftwpwaesr dee* not d iffe r iw y greatly from the sepssbed fmquenoy.
ChW jpam equal* 2.906 whioh lesa&es P between ,70 aid .90* Firm
tid e I t 1* Man th at f« r sen and waaan oaebined, them is as i*3*»
tta ish ip M m b the a ttitu d e toward goal* and the patnt-hour ra tio ,
Oat* la Table LOT am pwaoatsd to iadic&ta i f them I* a
relat i onship between attitu d e toward friends end point-hour m tiee
fo r —a and n e w w d d a d . In th is tab le the saqpsoted fte ^ e w y
and abeermd fte p ia g r am ep fra d o M jr the sew la t u t s e ll, A
m3** o f *971 fo r 4 degrees o f f im t a ehcMS th at P U rn between
.95 and .99. fti o f these da&& one sbqt ecaioljude that* fo r
9*n WQMR C ^biQ 9d| th ere 1* no W iflfbiOnfflll y bet®!*®®! SbSiitiitiHSkB
teuard D r M i and pfllskênr ratio*
In Table LXVH th e d ata presented « t o whether th e re is a
re la tio n sh ip between th© a ttitu d e o f th e sen toward friend* and th e
point-hour ratio® earned by then* For m n th ere ia no reOatlonahi$5
between th ese two footers*
In Table H O T d ata are arranged in d icatin g th e re la tio n sh ip ,
i f any, o f th e a ttitu d e o f th e w m m toward fHead® and th e ir point*
h ear ratio s* There le m re la tlo n a h ip between th e a ttitu d e o f -th e
wwwn toward friend * and th e ir painty-hour ratio®*
ta b le XJtU contains data to rev eal e a r fe a sib le re2atl*® Bhi|j#,
fo r m a and women cosfcined, between th e a ttitu d e toward superior* and
point-hour ra tio * th is ta b le dee® n et aha* any very g reat d if ference
TABLE UffX
B8LATI08SH2P BSMB® OT2OTDB TOWARD FBIE8D3
ARB FOXffiMKOS SATXO (881 ARB ROBB)
A ttitude Toward Jfc T ti I jl

m »> _____ Wft. ' lS£s» m m .
Severely (1.6) (4.4) (4*8)
Disturbed X 5 S ii
K ildly (26. 8) (71.0) (7M >
Disturbed n 79 174
S ail (41.4) Ofi9*4> 0 1 7 .1 )
MJtesfceS ..........M l............ IQS 214 266
M* .. ................ 4S3_-----
a& * .971 df » 4 F lia s b& mm .95 and .90

The expected fraqaesi^y appears la pareathesas A bm the observed fiô an cy .
i
•Sstm&aai pawecqo «n •uq* s»seq$»2»i « | esaMfeit Aewbwgr po^secixe «&
86* P®*66* w*W «9ft <f t*JP 4SC*«g*
W “I f
IF
»*S) TW
a 98 %
{€*£*) <f*W) A pt o
t 0 I 0
(5* ) <£* ) (0 )
v**m i m m m
m ss fMmmsm ammo
(sm) mm wmrwm <m
mmm m m mmm msim m m iirm
nm s r m
128
v\ o
1
£
i: i
I
H3SUTI0»SHIP HEMS®
a* 4
$
<+
n
ft
t '
I
TABLE I.™
m M im m p m m & m m m twa&b m m a m
mx>mm-nm B r n o (mt m mm)
mt
FttlntjAiBr a rtto , „«..,■■■« i.. .

Toward 4*5 to 2.1 . r e t s 1*4
Ko« Tqfcalg
Severely (4.7) (13.5)
Disiuifeed 4 33 14 31
(18.0) (4 7 m (51.1)
m steat»a 16 42 m m
jfell (47*1) (124.5) (133-3)
jg » 2.548 df » 4 P lie s batw ea .70 and .50

Tb& appears i& p&resf&aees abw a th e ( t e m i frs&pe&ey,
1&4
th e m d th® tm ^ r n ^ &a angr
category* a v ah si o f 2*548 f«»* 4 « f ffcmdm P
b»ta*8«& *70 a»4 *50* Thus th« ean® lm im is th a t th®m la
bo relafcletiahtp hotiOM a ttitw le toward o w r io r s m t
ra tio *
Tabl* tXX oonoiotii o f ta ta revealirsg whatim* th ere io a Sfcla**
tieo ah ip botaooB a ttitu d e toward (subordinates m 4 fodteWaoar ra tio
f* r sna m A m mm MBhtxiot* 3& cash s e l l of th e tafc&® tlfcc msnher
o f OOOOO io * tlyk oaoopaâa am f-lm
^ ^P' flB glietiSifeeiS oki*iM
fâO'Spw^^PT^Faa^pâa
ooo Ppt *fctf34»«TWsti'^Pu iffitAwwsr*
k
ealoo o f !U 9)i fo r 4 tagrooo o f froeOm shows th a t f M m \m tm m

•8D in d *70* Frost th lo o if msst th ^t th ere io bo- jps**-
tafeiM yiiip hotiflooB sttitio d h tooasrt eehortioatee pcKlBtôar ratio *
y ^ y *# T-*** *ôwt f*-frfiat ff^ o Ht-rlt roXsvant to th e y elat litfiffoflii* he#*
toooB ^ttitodO tosotifA Bother unci. pftitfjiti hcwit* r a tio fo r fBtfwi nfflt
eeefcined. & th e highest and wSM l» group th ere i s & s lig h t tin *
danagr f a r th e te n te r « f d ts ta te d ease* to exmwd th e axpwsted am *
h e r and for th e m a te r o f w ell adjust#* to be te w , Xn th e te m s t
point-hour n i l * group t t e tren d i s f i r tb s disturb#* sum* to bo
la s s than th e expected m e te r and f a r th* w ell adjusted eases to be
g re a te r. In th is ta b le Chi-square equals 7.31* which fo r 4 degress
o f freedom p lu » # P between .20 an* *10. Th* eemtiMdsn i s thus
w arranted th a t student* disturb** in th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e ir
a e th e r ton* to oak* h ig te r avarag** in eeur**# taken while thou*
adjusted in th ie a ttitu d e tend to note t e a r amwoge* in th e ir
soar*«*• This tendency is g re ater than chans* but is not s u ffic ie n tly
» a
I
%
f MS &XX
*>*%
3*. *5
1!
1
0£
* a*
m j^ U #•—**
M
% *2 3
« s® sm
«f
M
g*
£
A
*I
a • J b a m b t f paiuascjo w?* a&oqs saew fjaajw i b j •JBsdH's .fcHaanfc&Q peâedxe « q
@1* pue eg;* anHâq « f t 4 «? • JP 9t£*i *
■ m 1 i , " ir " '" w *k ' ^ uw s
-..m — " ............ 1¥T set -------ppgjp
(s*«et) (fWE) (6*5?*?) TT»S
LSI m os n P*fci»Wa
(A*9») ir« ) (S*9T) Aran
(Z 8 ft 8
(?*CT) (8*rt) {***) j£t«*ABS
’TTHlxTTT »**».................... . ■**1 **wk
................... .
¥TWW -.....WTgyfc.. ^ “80*? pza»£ epnrmv
o%pni j6narvip*i
(fswManr «®0 olcth santiuxtMaw
m m cravau smtxuv asua <ohs»qxw,bh
n n xmi
m
h ig h t o t o o f eba&totto&X *
to Table VEXXtL to ts are presented todica&tog whether th ere la

a re la tio n sh ip between jffiferd Jfotfoy and p s to M w ra tio
fo r men and m*asn combined, to each c e ll of th e ta b le too observed
£ee<$*ency i s apiBrastoaiely to e ««n» as the cggpeetod tooqpMUMqr* A
a? value o f .798 fo r 4 degrees o f f r e s t a shows th a t > lie® between
•95 and *90. These d ata dedicate th a t fo r m end mmm carabined,
th e re to a s re la tio n sh ip between a ttitu d e toward fa th e r and the
point-hour r a tio achieved to course® tohoa*
uses are arranged &n lanxs
T b n A eft £fc4IM fe A -ftM ftA M J i M w t UUft "7
to dis close w isther th ere
A t ftfe. j AA e e le iC 4 jA A J& l.M iiltftJ h H M 4 - t h l i 'i f t l l W
to a re la tio n sh ip between a ttitu d e toward fam ily and potoWAcmr ratio *

Tn th ift feAlft tlu i fiQ&ftMST Of to eatftjfo «m*I1 to ^Taira^wsrlimrfcol-wtltO
m as th e eepeetod frequency* h » a a# value o f S*9H and 4 to *

gross o f freedom P l ie s between *70 and *50* th e s e to t s a ta * th a t
between a ttitu d e toward .family and pototohour ra tio th ere to m mlm*
to T able IXX3® to ts are p rese n ted to to to s a to w hether th e re

to a re la tio n s h ip between ctfritu d e tow ard ugMfffr f o r men and women
com bined, and pototo ho ur ra tio * to g en e ra l th e re to a s lig h t tenden
cy f o r persons s e l l a d ju ste d to t h e i r a ttitu d e tow ard wesson to make
b e tte r averages and f o r th o se d istu rb e d to th i s a ttitu d e n o t to do
<juito so w e ll to courses* A a£ watoe o f 4*d70 f o r 4 to p e e s o f ffco®**

to e lo cates P between *50 and *30* From th is ta b le one may sonoluto
th a t th o se who a re w*H a d ju ste d to t h e i r a ttitu d e tow ard mmm te n d
s lig h tly to achieve h l^ is r averages to course-w ork and th o se d to tw b e d
@6* TW» 56* BMâq 6»vt <| * * JP
rZ'KreB'^
'T " M
(0*S£T) (5 * m ) tro
9XT 4* as
(C*ft) (4*4t)
sc St 91
(«*5T) (e*lrt) (*TS)
P tM ln p jm a i
{mm m sast) owm msshesm om
w m n m m i m m m i itm m d v m z in r w
m n rm i
•jEkch&nV p u w y a&eqp m m tp a n d sj antacid* ^soaofeaaz peâa& t « n
< £• pu® o f o m h ^ 8*Tl d %* » TC6*Z *
861 S8T 04
Cft 6ct iS
oHk) (rw t)
w tSf
Ow- 8E psq^qepg
t&m (o*a) (5‘2t)
« 9 8 s
(£*f) «-•*) (ft's)
ffi55J IS 1 TBjJ
y rsn s * 8 MM£ *m T W
~ * w is $ R 8 P 3 -
(8SNQR 0CT KW) OUTS fflOH-iMCM OBI
n a n w an u aoaxxuv rasnisn <mK»urm
xnsn m u
’^saan&aj; pa/ueoqo mage Msstnumsd of Meadde jfoiwnbeoj paqsadn «&
0£» pm oS* lawmw d ** w ai8*^ » &
« 9 .......... r...... iHT ' At oi T ... .........
w g g eg m n « ■W i i ■ i m»I"""»' ■m un.
ZTZ Ifo 08 ----------iST... —
(5*98) a*e€) xm
6TZ 96 *6 2£ pacingsfa
U*S6) (9*68) (8*££) A ptpc
Z2 9 91 { paqjn^Bja
(9*6) (6*8) (£*£) jPg&sa&eg
■*51 Iffl
*T§ " tano$
ss O EBL_ . r<n z*z $*w*c& «pnTmv
{umm m Ira) aim wc®~wm
am mm mmi mnum usarisa msmurm
A nn navi
m
in th is a ttitu d e tend a ll^ t ly to aatatew loww aueragaa. th is tan-
teugr la aw m tat graater than ohanos tout la net s ta tis tic a lly ale*
n ific a n t.
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
wm m
In th is study data have boon analysed to determine whether

the Sacks Sentence Completion Tost has value in identifying th e prm*»
peetive t eacher d » premises t s ho noot successful mui the one who
promises to ho le a s t su ccessfu l.
The study Is based on data collected in seven public and four
private Louisiana teacher-training in s titu tio n s fo r white students#
Few btmdred fifty -th ree etudent-teaeh&rc co n stitu te th e experimental
population, 160 nan and 293 women.
The Sacks Sentence Completion Test was devised by Dr. Joseph
K* Sacks and o th er psychologists of th e Nee York Veterans Adsaini©-»
tration Mental Hygiene Sendee# In I t s o rig in al fom i t consists of
sla ty lneemplete sentences which measure fifte e n a ttitu d e s . As mad*
ifls d fo r use in th is study i t consists o f incomplete
sentences which measure the following fourteen a ttitu d e s toward*
(1) colleagues, (2) 01m a b ilitie s , (3) the past, (4) the future,
( 5) fe a rs , (6) g u ilts fe e lin g s, (7) goals, ( 8) frien d s, (3) su p erio rs,
(10} subordinates, (11} mother, (12) fa th e r, (13) fam ily, (14) woman.
The data co llected from each of the participating in s titu tio n s
in c lu d e fo r each student, a completed te s t fo m , the student-teaching
grads and th e point-hour ra tio in course work taken p rio r to student-
339
Welling.
ecoring o f the te s t yield s for each student on each o f the

fourteen attitu d es an adjustment rating o f "severely disturbed*' 9
" olld ly disturbed" o r l*wwXl adjusted”* Xn ens phase &£ the inves
tig a tio n the adjustment o f tin students m ouch a ttitu d e w studied
la relation to the atudeat~ieacMng grade# Another phase o f the
problem was to study the adjustment o f the students m each o f th e
fourteen attitu d es la relation to the point-hour ra tio la courses
1 shen prior to student-teaching,
& addition to the two mala fa c e ts o f th e probXesi c e rta in
e e r d lu y comparisons have been made* Theee ares
1# A «beek on the r e lia b ility o f th e searin g o f th e te sts
2* Relationship between grade in stud en t-teach in g and th e sex
o f the student*
3* R elationship between point-hour ra tio and grade in student**
teaching fo r mm and women corsfoined, and also fo r men and weassn sep
arately*
4s R elatio n sh ip between adjustm ent In a ttitu d e and sex»
5* R elationship between point-hour r a tio and th e stu d en t1®

MX*
In a l l o f th e above comparisons except retationsfcip between
grade in stu d en t-teach in g m d sex , th e d ata ware arranged in contin
gency ta b le s and th e x? t e s t fo r independence o f th e fa c to rs was ap
plied* For a study o f th e re la tio n sh ip between grads in stu d e n t-
teaching and sex* c r i t i c a l r a tio s were ccssipated fo r the d ifferen c es

134
the percentages o f each m c making eaeh grade.
FTNDIUG3 COIWmiHa TOE aKUTI0N3HIP BKTACT

ATTITUIE MB (MAIE XKf 3TOITO-TEACHIIS
A ttitu d e Tm m rd SStiffiBflSSB*
1, There ie a tendeasy Ter mum who ere disturbed in th e ir
attitu d e toward colleagues to make lower grades in etudeut-teaebing
**d for woman w ell adjusted in th is a ttitu d e to mk© higher student-*
t eaching grades. This tendency Is s ta tis tic a lly re lia b le , (P is
greater than the *01 lev el,}
2» There i s as sig n ifica n t relationship between the men’s
attitu d e toward colleagues and the grades which they make In student-*
teaching.
ASettitude
w Toward «O
eSwwiSSaLmmSSBSBrnm w
SS
8Ln*^SSStSmmmSBSmm
A b ilitie s,
1# There is a tendency Tor stu d e n ts who a re d istu rb e d in
th e ir attitu d e toward th eir own a b i l i t i e s to make lew s£ud®ni«*teaeb~
Jag grades and Tor students w e ll ad ju sted to make h ig h er grades* and
th is tendency i s s ta tis tic a lly r e lia b le at a le v e l between ,02 and
,01,
2 , There i s no re la tio n s h ip between th e a ttitu d e o f th e m m
tow ard t h e i r own a b i l i t i e s and th e grades th ey antes in a tu d sn t-te a c h -
in g ,
3, Women who a re d istu rb e d in th e ir a ttitu d e tow ard th e ir own
a b i l i t i e s te n d to make low er grades in ® tud«rrt*teaching and women who
it
i!
1
I
i
*
«
the pest end their studeat-fceaching grade

! Il| !
*>
jS
5
I I ! I 1j *
I
$
%*
&
|
i
Ui
Jj
.. .
If
&
1
* I
41
i
I
it*
8
S
tltude toward the future and the grade earned in

296
^toward Pears,
I* P«r mm and m m m eoahined then* 2a n s relatio n sh ip be-
twesn a ttitu d e toward fear* and student-teaching grads.
A ttitu d e toward
1# A disturbed attitu d e toward g u ilt-feelin g a ««mm to he
aasesUfced nore frequently with a bettor grade in stud©nt**Ua*hiog
and e » U adjusted attitu d e toward th is footer is asseel&ted store
ffeeoaen&ly with a poorer grade hot th ia iendansy io net h lg a y selia ~
b le , (P lie s between ,20 and #20.)
A ttitude Toward Goals*

1, Students who are disturbed In th e ir a ttitu d e toward th e ir
goals tend to make lower grades In student-teaching and these who are
w ell adjusted tend to stales higher grades, but th is tendency Is not
highly r e lia b le , (P lie s between ,20 and ,2 0 ,)
Attttuda tmmxd ftstomfc.

1, There i s no re la tio n sh ip between a ttitu d e toward friends
and grade In student-teaching fo r awn and wxasn combined*
2, Per woman th ere is no relatio n sh ip between a ttitu d e to
ward friends and grade In stwdtah-teaching*
3m There is no r« lia b le rolatiom jliip bafcwaen the nan*a r t t l-
toward friand* mad th eir grad* In •tudent-teaching,
Attitada Umar* 3 m » ricra.

X. Tbara ! • * a lig h t tandaney far paroans dXatttrbad in ttM ir
is?
a ttitu d e toward superior® to *wto» l e w gradee in atudent-teachiag
•ad fo r these w ell adjusted la th is a ttitu d e to m ke higher grades
t a t th is tendency la net sign ifican t* (P H as between #50 and #30#)
A ttitude Toward Subordinates*

1* There la & tendency f a r students who are w ell adjusted la
th o ir a ttitu d e toward saberdbm tes to nek* re la tiv e ly h l# t gy&dee la
■ ta te W ttA to g and t a r those disturbed in thi© a ttitu d e to saake
re la tiv e ly lew grades* taLa tendency 1b g reater than chance b at la
n e t k ijM y reliab le* (P Xiao between #90 and # 20*)
2# Thar* 1# a eery a lig h t tendency f ta W ) w ell adjusted la
th e ir a ltite d i toward subordinates to wake higher grades eud fop
w m m d ista ste d in th is a ttitu d e to nake lower grades la studeni~te&oh“
lag but th is tendsnsy la not reliab le# (P H as between «50 and #30#}
3* Thore la no rela tio n sh ip between th e a ttitu d e o f the sea
toward th e ir subordinates and th e ir grade in student-teaching*
A ttitude Toward Sjeffia&r*

1# These la no sig n ific a n t relatio n sh ip between a ttitu d e toward
aeth er and student^teaohizxg grade*
Attitude Tpwnrd Father^

1, There la no re lia b le relatio n sh ip between one** a ttitu d e
toward hie fa th e r and hie grade in etudanfc-teachiag*
M M Xvte 3 a a M ftd liz »

1 . Th*r* i» m KtffdjMeanfc relationrtjlp tw im m attitud e toward
m
f& allj and studinlH&eaelilng
A ttitu d e Toward ^Qgaagic

X* There I s & te n d e n c y fo r students who sir® disturbed In th e ir
a ttitu d e toward wssasa to m ka low grades in student-teaching and fo r
^ o w w»H adjusted in th is a ttitu d e to mSm higher grades* l#dlo
th is tendency 1* g re ater than chance i t is not a highly sig n ifican t
tendency stabiatieaX ly* ( f lie s between «X0 and *05*)
2* There i s no re la tio n sh ip between th e a ttitu d e o f the s m
toward wonea and th e grad® th e non stake in sbudmt-ieaolfeing*
a ttitu d e o f th e m ean
t m i d th e fin a le sex end th e grades which th e wosaeui stake in student*
teaching*
r o n s s cojcsamm the remtiois ^
88TWEBN ATTXTUt® AND POXIJT-HOOR HATXO
A ttitude Toward Cfrllsagaû

1* There Is no re la tio n sh ip between the students* a ttitu d e
toward colleagues and th e point-hour ra tio in courses taken p rio r to
student-teaching*
A ttitude Toward Own A b ilitie s*

1* For am and r a m combined there i s no relatio n sh ip between
th e a ttitu d e toward one’s own a b ilitie s and th e point-hour ratio*
2* For m il th e re i s no s ig n ific a n t re la tio n s h ip between a t t i
tude toward th e ir own a b ilitie s and th e ir point-hour ratios*
m
3# th e w m m th ere Ja a tmtimwp t m
^ IM i —IX adjusted In bb*lr a ttitu d e toward th e ir own a b ilitie s to
•e ra higher ararageu in eeure*s taken sad fo r these disturbed in tlile
a ttitu d e to w ra lower averages in tb s ir c o u r ts , The s ta tis tic a l
p ro b ab ility o f th is tendency ie o u m c ie n tly high to ho ounsidsred
f a ir ly sig n ifican t* (F lie s between *05 and *02*)
J^ S S E $25SSS 26»
1* I t o o i s m re la tio n sh ip between th e a ttitu d e toward th e
p ast and peiab-hour r a tio in oeuzuee taken p rio r to stndenbêaehing*
2* There i s m re la tio n sh ip between th e a ttitu d e of th e ism
toward th e peat and th e ir point-4aour ratio s*
3* th e re i s no re la tio n sh ip between tb s a ttitu d e of th e
wo—a to wa rd th e p ast and th e ir point-hour ratio s*
A ttitude Toward The Future,

1* For —a and — a eeofelzied th ere is no relatio n sh ip be
tween th e a ttitu d e toward the future and point-hour ratio#
2* There i s no relatio n sh ip between the —n*s a ttitu d e toward
th e fu tu re and point-tieor ratio s*
iHâsa shoe* saaia*

1* There i s no re la tio n sh ip between th e a ttitu d e toward fears
sad point-hour r a ti— fo r mm end we—n outlined o r fo r men and m m
separately#
A tutarf? Tom al M S S rlssM a a -

1
I
I
I
§
A&tibuds Toward
X# M mte h e d in t w p a ttitu d e toward th e ir w fcterc
tend to sake l i S ^ r averages In sources and thoee w ell adjusted In
th is a ttitu d e tend to sake lower averages In courses* th is tendency
im g reat op than ekanee t u t is not s u m u le n ily h i # to be ita fe M li*
a lly algciiflcariU (P Ho© between *,50 arid *10*}
A ttitude Toward Patter*

1* » « ? • i* no re la tio n sh ip between a ttitu d e toward l e t t e r
and p o t e t e r r a tio .
A ttitude Toward FamUy.

1. Between a ttitu d e toward fam ily and point-hour ra tio %hero
la no re la tio n sh ip .
A ttituda Toward Women*

1* Those who are v e il adjusted in th e ir a ttitu d e toward wmaan
tend s lig h tly to achieve higher averages in course work and those
d isturbed ia th is a ttitu d e tend e l i # t l y to achieve lower averages*
This tendency i s s lig h tly g re ater than ehanee but is not s ta tis tic
a lly sig n ifican t* (P lie s between *50 and *30*)
fihdihqs r a n coaooAKT
Student-Teaching Orade And iss*

1« There i s not a sig n ifican t difference In th e percentage
o f nan and th e percentage o f women who stake A in student-teaching*
2# In general th e percentage o f mmm *too aake 3 In student*
m
teaching tend* to b© higher tSurn th e percentage o f wen who sale* Bf
th is tendency i» not h ighly sign ifican t* (KsiUaib&s « t th e *10
le v e l.)
3. The percentage o f m i ^30 ssmke.C or I n s is s ig n ific a n t^
g re a te r than th e percentage o f mmm. who m ke C o r loos*
S a S tiH S s S lB S And FoittWfour M iS *

1* For m i sod w m m combined th ere i s a sig n ific a n tly M$1
p o sitiv e co rre la tio n between th e point-hour ratio® osad the studtafc-
teem in g grades* (F i s g re a te r then ®03U)
2* Fbr m i th ere Is a p o sitiv e relatio n sh ip between p o in t-
hour ra tio sod student-teaching grade hut i t Is re la tiv e ly low*
(P lie s between *20 and *10*)
3. For s e m i th ere i s a sig n ific a n t p o sitiv e eo rre la tic n be-
tween point-hour ra tio and grade la student-teaching» (F I s greater
than .0 1 .)
lif f e g e m Boteeen Tbs Seaes |& Their M tltudss*

1. There is a tendency for m i
th eir attitu d e toward wmam bwfc th« tsndeaey i s a»fc
it c t lit t M llr rig riflM B t. (P lie s between .50 and .3 0 .)
2 . There la a tandeaey for maun to be wire dletuibed la
fch«iw a ttitu d e toward th e ir own a b llitle a than man and th la tendency
i s relia b le a t a le v e l greater than .01*
3. Hnaa axe b etter adjueted In th eir ^ J | ^ | I&8HE& S ft
jg y l than man and tid e tendency la re lia b le, (p la greater than .0 1 .)
m
4* There i» a teadm ey for mm to be mem disturbed la th eir
attitu d e toward the tttw » than wotaen but the tendeaey is nab highly
s ignific a nt . (P U m between .10 and *05.)
5* there 1* a tendency far wofflea to bo m m fearfu l than am
bat th is taadmsgr la not highly re lia b le . (P lia s between ,10 sad
.0 5 .)
6* 2n general wwnsn tend to be atom disturbed by a«i2£r£iJti3afiS,
than am but th is tendency la so t highly re lia b le, (p lim between
.10 soft .0 5 .)
7 . Mmm tend to bo b etter adjusted to th eir attitud e t.gward
flS gft than am but th e tendency ie not highly r e lia b le . (P lie s b e-
twem .2 0 end .1 0 .)
8. In general m am tend to be b etter adjusted in th eir
attitu d e toward frienda than sen and the tendency la fa irly r e lia b le .
(P lie s between .0$ and .0 2 .)
9. There i s no relia b le difference between am and m am in
tb o ir adjustment in fftftiSafc jg fig a
10. There is a tmden*y for wonm to bo b etter adjusted in
th e ir efeMfa.*. toward suherdinafcea than a m , th is tendoney i s greater
than chsaoe but ie not highly r e lia b le . (P lie s between .30 end .2 0 ,)
11. Hen tend to be b e tte r adjusted in th e ir a ttitu d e toward
m ythor than wmnru Him tm tea a p ±a g m tto r than ofomm btifc la jjot
h i^ ily aignlfljcants (? U rn boiwwm *30 and ,20»)
12* Th*r« 1m tm sêXatlonalilp b&bmm mat m& a ttltu d o toward
fa tte r*
II! I
s
ifM
I i *
i J l !
i
jw #3?:
ill
3
I
1 a
4
*
3
$
i
11
I I
*
I i
146
4» Th&m should b# a olosas* H i m betem m p9ram m l las ®ds*»

catio n and psychology in working on th is problem*
A. BOOKS
Abt* Lawrono* Sdsdn and LoepcOd Ballalc. Pro.1«etiv» VKrtfaaHatti, Bnr

*«** Alfred A, Eaopf, 1990. 655 i£**®ssss^
B e ll, John 104—M il, P rojective Teehnitpiaa.. iim Torts* EongRsans,
Oraoa as4 Co., 1930. 533 9p .
Sarrofct, Saary £ » , Stsfcl o tle a in Payohology and BdnaatAan. Bear Torts*
Lonffaana, Qroon a%j[ 60. , l i f t . 4»Fhs7
Daniel B«# ami I** Clark# gfrebleiaa o f Teaafoiar
't* 4 &©port o f tn© flS*d i^ S S S tW tivo
o f 1952 o f The Capit al Area School D m lo p iest Aasoela**
tta&* Albany* »** * ** # MW* 36 PP*
MktU r# Igroi* 0»f The PradlgtieBt o f Stieeaa* fog Stmfeafta In Teacher
g to a tio n . w m V m m * m 9
Got^nfelii yniyoraity, 1944* 120 jsp*
Tngp^v Mnttdoo £** and 0# Stifeert ?*•»* E w elm tlooln X&t&foay
ito itlflB o Washington, B* 6*1 AraêanjK £SS& m I S H t o ,
3§A4* 3SS# pp#
&* fe^ bxcal A irnctss
A lezantar. Ite ra n t «&**# « fte P rediction o f In teractio n

ttlth a P ro tectiv e f e e t ,9 Journal o f C lin ical
6I27V 76, July# 1950*
XXI. m& MUmd Brae* lemls* *Q aantitaiiw
Bemteaoh Footers in th e E*&a«atl*m of Teacher X&feet&vmea,*
Stanford Snlvergitva A b stra c t o f M jp p t^ o iio ^ 1$4&*49«
B ail*,
1949# 24# 3«r* # , Sfe* 35®) Abetaraei o f M* B* fheeia# 1949.
Dswey* ! k m M *, ^School P m to lm * i n m m Xm fk S tate#9 ggw fork
S tate M asaijoe# 39»l?iU7a# B eep er# IfSX*
Oould, S . HewM*, “Kdifcorial," M SE& SiSSft S S o S lsa * 39*167-65,
M e M ir , 1951.
Oxdodor, Calvin, and Harry K, IM » m , "Tanporaraont in Prospective
Toartsors," Journal Educational Roaoareb. 35*653-93, Kay, 1962.
149
Wwwloksan, Ernest H,# ■’Csrapei'isons of Hating# o f Voles an! f8®8&-
lag A b ility
Bl^JL —.. „ ^
," Journal , £ Educational eeaaueP**"e*eUPePWP8^"
*j4 Hk .
a
F«rohol«gr.. 34*121-^,”
•’Sbrnariy',. 1943*
<$0&®a, HmaM D erail, “The Prediction of Teaching B ffleieney freea
O bjective Heasare8f « Journal ©f gsarariflaental Moe&fri©a»
S©ptC6rfbCr —lUW A ftifiSgpB ^^
Id a s , loo *■—) * , "Tfce VrwHeMoB o f Teashlttg EffiSotoaRsr," Journal

fig. a w r t w ^ i l ift»—t l a i . 1582-60. Sonfcoafeor. 1%A.
ft—art, Seergo A ,, "E M tlsnal D asto b ility and Toasting 3a»—as.*
flsaw a, a t a e s s a f e 37*335-41* ost****, 1343.
dnr, Laos S ,, "Ttoe HaanamMnfe and Prediction of Taaohtng
A b ility ," Softool and Society. 51*30-32, January, 1940,
, Kay V ,, "Prognostic Teats and Teaching Sue— ,* Journal of
‘ Baa—gab. 38*685-90, Hry, 1345, “ '
K*f “Tiie Geli etfi i l ty of1the isEUtihs Pereonalil^jy Catl ing
* £ }•» * i S m l SL lM M *a— r« 34*373-77, Sejifearfear,
iw «
M, T*, «sd H* h» t a m i “fleeter An&lysie ©f th e Pardo©
Bating Seal© fo r In stru c to rs," Jw a m l o f B&K^tiqnal Psychology*
34*363-67, 3ejrteaber, 1943*
a T# M«# "IdentificatX on «nd S election o f Proapecfcive
Teachers," Mgr Xgg& gfajffi f U f t f e f t . 39*194-95, Booeatoer, 39fL
Strati, M* Hargareb, Ida A* Jewett* and Vera If* Butter, "Better
S eleetlen o f Teachers,* Monograph Spattered by the Delta Kappa
Gnu© S ociety, Printed tgr National Capital Pro©©, She*,
Hcahingtan, B* 0*, 1943* 110 pp*
Tanner* W illieo C«# Jr*, "Persom lity Baoea in T e a se r Selection,**
Phi Delta Kappan, 35*271*74, 277, April* 1954*
Ten Baden, Herbert I* , “An Evaluation of .ftm en al Data p lo y e d in
th e Prodtetien ©f C aching E fficiency,* JouirâjL
Education* 15*41-84, Septeii&er, 1944*
W ilson, 2o«d* A*, "The Too in Beeriiitosait," tork S tate f
39*176-78, D e e p e r, 1951*
BIOGRAPHY
lym n Land* Jones m s bom in Lculsian&» October 2d,

1906* He m e educated in th e piddle schools o f Hammd, end grad
uated ffem th e Ha&nend Hlgjh School In 1923* Ho attended Louisiana
S ta te t o iw a it y and received Bachelor o f Science and Master o f Arte
Degrees In 1931 and 193S respectively*
la 1931 be was emg&ayed In th e public school system o f
Tang ipahoa Parish and served as eXasareen teach er a t th e Hard lin e
School and the Banmnad School* He served as p rin c ip a l o f th e
Hammond E U m stary Seheel fo r fiv e /e a rs t v m 1933 to X940* He
served as principal o f the Amite High School fo r four years from
1940 to 1944* In 1914 he m s appointed to the f&euXty o f Southeastern
Louisiana College and is at present serving th a t in s titu tio n as pro-*
feasor o f education*
He m s married to Catharine Freet, o f 8m Orleans, Louisiana,
in 1935* Their sen, Lyman, J r* , m s bom In 1941, and th e ir daughter*
Catharine E lisabeth, m s bom in 1944*
EXAMINATION AND THESIS REPORT
Candidate: XgMB Lcm l* J a n es
Major Field:
Title of Thesis : An A nalysis o f th e Sacks Sentence GoiapXefcien Test as an

XnstnsBsnt for Teacher Selection
Approved:
M ajor P rofessor and Chairman
Dean-<Ji the XBraduate School
EXAMINING COMMITTEE:
Date o f E xam in ation :
Ju ly 2? i 195fc

An Analysis of The Sacks Sentence Completion Test As An Instrumen PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

An Analysis of The Sacks Sentence Completion Test As An Instrumen PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Louisiana State University

LSU Digital Commons

An Analysis of the Sacks Sentence Completion Test

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses

Submitted to tha Graduate Faculty o f the

All rights reserved

INFORM ATION TO ALL USERS

degrees and d e p o site d in the L ouisiana S ta te U n iv e r sity Library

are a v a ila b le f o r in sp e ctio n * Use o f any t h e s is i s lim ite d by the

r ig h t s o f the author* B ib lio g r a p h ic a l r e fe r e n c e s may be n oted , but

p assages may n ot be co p ied u n less the author has g iv en perm ission*

C red it must be g iv e n in subsequent w r itte n or p u b lish ed work*

A lib r a r y w hich borrows t h i s t h e s is fo r use by i t s c l i e n t e l e

i s ex p ected t o make su re th a t th e borrower i s aware o f the above

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

EoiiahXltfcar o f oooring * * * * » « • » » # . « « 2&

tttlM tom ** w U aagnm * . . * * . • * . * « * 97

Ato t toftO IWIWWNi SBBiS * 9 * # * * « #* a *# a#

i4444iliimU tnmirri SHytoox*

V* AUD C0H01^dXC3IKS i * t * # i # * * f * » * « « 131

I* R e lia b ility o f Searing o f th e Sacks

Ratio (Man and Woman)

tSU R elatimxtoip Between Attitude Toward I m

There wsjfq no mwi y*i>. cffeMtfW* botwoon grads in stew

«s M N M d Igr feto w m nII ^ b M h w ra tio and (b)

S£ to e sreblento This research to lim ited to

W t b* caroffeU p m od In M H m iU n w ith o&har footers* l« m u l

So r ofe renoo t o o wbko scXeettv* odHtOMten to tom bing* AmU

IccMndttdiBi ©f th© field * ^ ©f & low©

ift® JSWWWB^ptp^ SbfiMf ^SM

D enlel S , ( P tm tte and Qovtd U C b d c. ftroMMMB CMC

Steett m g that no tme H ill **«*»««» « wma&er m is in the

S f# «♦ S tlanstt* »I<3«ntificatl«m And 3e le « tte i Of Pros**

^ K# b e p e t Strok* Ida A* Jewefct# and Vara M» Butler*

7 Jc in Etos^sto B ^ lf ^ o ^ s g t^ s TsciiRtoues. (Saw T«fki

su b ject over th e behavior which I s to be e e } ^ and

Sentence eoBipjeticR te st*

afcflfrft Sentence Completion Testa A sen ten ce eoeapXetiosi t e s t

9 Ibid*, pp* i**5#

A ttitu d e. A d isp osition with regard to a person* th in g o r

Savwgsto d istu rb ed . The su b ject appear© to aw p lre ther*

i M r disturbed. The s u b le t ha* «aotiom l conflict© in

-jjhUL sISaSjBl* eebiesb has no sig n ific a n t diatmbane® in

G reeted team ing wider the supervision o f a s^iporvising toacher.

P oin tsw ar r a tio ,

XU. SOOECES OF DATA

the d ata u e d in th is study vara seem ed by adsdadeboring the

aigmti ffeso tH$ vooqv&i «f th* diisetsm of stute^feea/Mng at

i& tllS f*f jsiSS^^ity t>i|^^^Wipttya%t

ho ooofal Is tho moot likstr prospseta for to

gtuttent Is $vee0K&e& In ^ y^#y ff!T» Tto& o£ tiie

to th is «ta|*«r • nwimt to pvsssnbed «C gtmttm totob turn

&» ataafeiag li& asstsa* rs la ts d h# to c h e r m lae& isa or® I s

Soma ooUgnrlM of latwawfetat wm* oaSoolod to few 2ao»

2iHWPBit0iy$ tbs ttMntinnai* ^tet*#at Bl&hfcf tin

t HniHnrtNyy to slnsdiifliNt^asBiaHpii a t tin j fytawnnf ty ©d? ffteh aynl

Tfaw ir *«a paoa analvm th a aalaafciM mfMraisaa in asBawbSeB

* Bmwob Ammhmmv J r ,0 “loo rw w ietion Of Toasnop-F^pa

ar i t i o tg8iBlMB?ii|i <b4 ijsMKPvliWfli Aii inetnAiaAashSi fo r jpiPiHfifeiAfejyog

* M h » 2* tsrosw ami C* Robert z>ace, m m lm M m In fffftfhar

alwlMrti I aim lm a a t t i m Sitafea Q olvw raity o f X a m t o d o tan stn o A t b w

tfcaar ooqpurad atradaafca la Dm Xawaafc and hi^Mot <|uayfcaMi. Itwy

aaoatt a ta d a o ta a t Dm S ta te taaflb ara G oliaga la K ana& ald, P annsyl-

There wsjfq no mwi yi>. cffeMtfW botwoon grads in stew

9 Ibid, pp i**5#

TO**^E1JwpsuS «fa sP Zl£g6tTs £*

2 13.227 df * 4 P lie s between .02 and .01

m a le __ A _ _ a ------------ _______ 3 9 ------------ ........ 160

Totals ___ 322.......... ..._ J 2 _____ _ ____S22L -

3? » 63AO df « 2 p lie s b e t m 05 sod *02

A ttitude Toward floors* Bata in Table XXII show tho re la tio n

A ttitude Toward Q uill &i fab le XXX? data are pre

a? « 536? df 2 P lie s between .10 and .05

2 .574 « *4 p H es between .98 and .9$

a? £ 7393 df ^ 4 p u $8 between 30 and *10

x2 = 253S df » 2 P lie s between 20 mid .10

«♦«»«» Toward ftffUnds. Data la Table SOTH in d icate th a t

as? * 2056 df • 2 P lie s between 5D m d *30