PREMID EH303 DBL OBLICON

OBLIGATIONS unquestionable that the person bound is the husband of the patient
and not her father and mother in
law; the fact that it was not her husband who called the plaintiff and
A. General Provisions (Arts. 1156-1162) requested his assistance is no bar
1. Concept and Birth of Obligation to the fulfillment of the said obligation
2. Elements of Obligation ii. Contracts (1159; 1305)
3. Kinds of Obligation according to subject matter PEREZ VS PALOMAR
4. Sources of Obligation (1157) MARITIME COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES VS REPARATIONS COMMISSION
i. Law (1158) NHA VS. CA
BAUTISTA VS. F.O. BORROMEO, INC
PELAYO VS LAURON iii. Quasi-Contracts (1160; 2142; 2144; 2154)
MARTINEZ VS MARTINEZ CRUZ VS. JM TUASON & CO., INC.
FACTS: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAUDI ARABIA VS. CA
On September 15, 1964, the Ford truck of petitioner Roberto Tan Ting driven SEBASTIAN SIGA-AN VS. ALICIA VILLANUEVA
by Abelardo Bautista, the other petitioner, and the Volkswagen delivery
panel truck owned by respondent Federico O. Borromeo, Inc. (hereinafter iv. Delict (1161; 2177; Art. 100, 104 of RPC)
called Borromeo) were involved in a traffic accident along Epifanio de los DMPI EMPLOYEES CREDIT COOPERATIVE, INC. VS. VELEZ
Santos Avenue. HUN HYUNG PARK VS. EUNG WON CHOI
In said traffic accident, Quintin Delgado, a helper in Borromeo's delivery JEFFREY RESO DAYAP VS. SENDIONG
panel truck, sustained injuries which resulted in his instantaneous death.
Borromeo had to pay Delgado's widow the sum of P4,444 representing the v. Quasi-delict (1162; 2176)
compensation (death benefit) and funeral expenses due Delgado under the LASAM VS. SMITH
Workmen's Compensation Act. ELCANO VS. HILL
On June 17, 1965, upon the averment that the said vehicular accident was VIRATA VS. OCHOA
caused by petitioners' negligence, Borromeo started suit in the Municipal NEPLUM, INC. VS. ORBESO
Court of Mandaluyong, Rizal to recover from petitioners the compensation
and funeral expenses it paid to the widow of Quintin Delgado
July 23, 1965, the municipal court rendered
judgment in favor of Borromeo and against the
petitioners in the principal sum of P4,444, and
P500
attorney's fees, and costs.

ISSUE:
RULING:
Borromeo paid the widow of its employee,
Quintin Delgado, compensation (death benefit)
and funeral expenses for the latter's death while
in the course of employment. This obligation
arises from law — Section 2 of the Workmen's
Compensation Act.

Pelayo v Lauron
physician Pelayo filed a complaint against the Lauron and wife
Abella for payment of rendered medical
assistance for their daughter during childbirth; respondent spouse
claimed that she lived with her
husband independently and in a separate house and that her presence
in their house was accidental
and due to fortuitous circumstances; it does not appear that a contract
existed between the spouses
and the physician where they consented to bind themselves thus they
cannot be compelled to pay
fees for which they have no liability
obligations arising from law are not presumed and only those
expressly determined are
demandable; among the reciprocal obligations existing between a
husband and wife is that of support
which is established by law