Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8.hodgkin Lymphoma
8.hodgkin Lymphoma
changes over the past 50 years. The current approach is based on the
integration of morphologic, phenotypic, genetic, and clinical features
that allows the identification of distinct disease entities. This practical
approach to lymphoma categorization was initially proposed by the
International Lymphoma Study Group in 1994 and formed the basis of
the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasm
(REAL). It was then adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO)
classification of neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues,
published in 2001 and updated in 2008.The WHO classification
represents a significant achievement in terms of cooperation,
communication, and consensus among pathologists, hematologists, and
oncologists.
WHO
B-Cell Neoplasms
Precursor B-cell neoplasm
Precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
(precursor B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia)
Mature (peripheral) B-neoplasms
B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia / small lymphocytic lymphoma
B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia
Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma
Splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
(+ villous lymphocytes)
Hairy cell leukemia
Plasma cell myeloma/plasmacytoma
Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT type
Nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
(+ monocytoid B cells)
Follicular lymphoma
Mantle cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma
Primary effusion lymphoma
Burkitt’s lymphoma/Burkitt cell leukemia
T and NK-Cell Neoplasms
Precursor T-cell neoplasm
Precursor T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
(precursor T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Mature (peripheral) T neoplasms
T-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia / small
lymphocytic lymphoma
T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia
T-cell granular lymphocytic leukemia
Aggressive NK leukemia
Adult T-cell lymphoma/leukemia (HTLV-1+)
Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type
Enteropathy-like T-cell lymphoma
Hepatosplenic γδ T-cell lymphoma
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma
Mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, T/null cell,
primary cutaneous type
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise characterized
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, T/null cell,
primary systemic type
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (Hodgkin’s Disease)
Nodular lymphocyte predominance Hodgkin’s lymphoma – 5%
Classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma – 95%
Nodular sclerosis Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Lymphocyte-rich classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Mixed cellularity Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Lymphocyte depletion Hodgkin’s lymphoma
More than 150 years ago, Thomas Hodgkin described several cases of a
lymphoproliferative disease, which was later named Hodgkin disease. This
malignancy, which is now called Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), has been one of
the most enigmatic forms of lymphomas for a long time. This is due to
several key features of the disease: First, the pathognomonic and
suspected tumor cells of HL, the mononuclear Hodgkin and the bi- or
multinucleated large Reed-Sternberg cells, are very rare in the tumor
tissue, often accounting for only about 1% of the cells. Thus the
molecular analysis of these cells was very much hampered until methods
became available to isolate these cells by microdissection from tissue
sections. Second, the Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells have a very
unusual immunophenotype, which does not resemble any normal cell in
the hematopoietic system. Therefore immunophenotyping, which was
very informative in revealing the cellular derivation of most other
lymphoid malignancies, did not help to uncover the cellular origin of
HRS cells. Third, only a few cell lines could be established from HL
patients, these lines were rather heterogeneous, and for hardly any of
these lines was the derivation from the HRS cells in the patient
unequivocally shown. Hence it was initially difficult to draw firm
conclusions from the study of such lines. Although HL still harbors many
secrets, exciting novel insights into the cellular origin of the HRS cells
and the pathogenetic processes in their generation have been obtained in
the last years, which will be discussed in this chapter.
Although much has been learned about the derivation of the HRS cells, little is
known about the basic mechanisms underlying malignant
transformation of HL. The HRS cells in HL are derived from pre-
apoptotic germinal center B cells in most cases, but in some cases, they
are of T-cell origin. The expression of EBV-latent genes in EBV-positive
cases (50%) may play a role in cellular transformation by upregulating
the transcription factor NF-κB. The events underlying the
transformation process in the EBV-negative cases, however, are still not
understood. Several studies have focused on the apoptosis-resistant
phenotype of HRS cells, and some data suggest that constitutively
expressed FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIP), a protein that inhibits FAS-
mediated apoptosis, contributes to apoptosis resistance in HL. Genetic
instability is a typical feature of HRS cells, and studies point to distinct
genetic imbalances rather than subtile genetic alterations such as point
mutations or microsatellite instability. Besides NF-κB, other
transcription factors are deregulated in HRS cells, contributing to the
lost B-cell identity of malignant cells in HL. The discovery that the HRS
cells themselves contribute to the ineffective immune response by
expressing immunosuppressive cytokines or by expressing chemokines
that predominantly attract Th2 lymphocytes that are incapable of cell
killing has widened our understanding of the environmental cross talk of
these peculiar cells.
Clinical Features
Investigation
Essential
– physical examination
– documentation of B symptoms
– laboratory evaluation
• complete blood count, ESR, Fbg
• liver function tests
• renal function tests
• lactate dehydrogenase
– chest X ray
– ultrasonography
– CT scan of chest, abdomen and pelvis
Essential under certain circumstances
– liver biopsy
– bone X rays
– MRI
– staging laparotomy
– bone marrow biopsy
Useful but not essential tests
– cell-surface marker phenotypic analysis
Positive diagnosis
• Clinic
• Lab tests
Mandatory : lymph node biopsy with hystopathological exam: Reed
Sternberg cells (typical and variants) admixed within a reactive cell
infiltrate composed of variable proportions of lymphocytes, histiocytes,
eosinophils and plasma cells.
Prognosis
Bad:
• stages III si IV
• age ≥ 50 years
• Extranodal site by contiguity
• ESR > 50mm/h
• B symptoms (except stage I)
• >3 lymph node regions
• “bulky” tumor
Good:
• stage I si II
• age < 50 years
• Without mediastinal tumor
• ESR < 30 mm/1h with B symptomes or ESR < 50 mm/1h without B
symptomes
Treatment – the goal = cure
• Stage I/II
– Favorable (2-)3 x ABVD + 30 Gy IN-RT
– Unfavorable 4 x ABVD + 30 Gy IN-RT
5 years survival rate 98%
• Stage III/IV 6 - 8 x ABVD/BEACOOP
5 years survival rate < 40%
15-30% relapse – high dose CT + autoSCT
Suspicion of HL
• identify B symptoms
• clinical exam – all lymph nodes
• ESR, Fbg, CBC, renal function, liver function…
• X ray, ultrasonography, CT
• Lymph node biopsy – Hp exam +/- IHC
• Stage
• Treat according to stage and prognosis factors
ABVD
Doxorubicin 25 mg/2, IV, day 1, 15
Bleomycin 10 mg/, IV, day 1, 15
Dacarbazin 375 mg/m2, IV, day 1, 15
Vinblastin 6 mg/m2, IV, day 1, 15
Every cycle at 30 days
BEACOPP basic
Doxorubicin 25 mg/2, IV, day 1
Ciclofosfamida 650/mp, IV, day 1
Etoposide 100mg/m2, IV, days 1-3
Vincristin 1,4mg/m2 (max. 2mg), IV, day 8
Bleomycin 10 mg/m2, IV, day 8
Procarbazina 100mg/m2, PO, days 1-7
Prednison 40mg/m2, PO, days 1-14
Every cycle at 21 days