legal profession
partial course outline for 2015
DEAN JOSE M. ROY Ll
1, Rule 138 ATTORNEYS AND ADMISSION TO THE BAR
§1 Who may practice law
BAR MATTER NO. 702, May 12, 1994.
See also, Rules 11 to 14 of Bar Matter No. 850, Oct. 2, 2001
In Re Gregory Ong
§2-6 Requirements for applicants for admission to the bar
Re: Application For Admission To The Philippine Bar, Vicente D. Ching, Applicant.
[B.M. No. 914. October 1, 1999]
Good Moral Character:
In Re Argosino: Bar Matter No. 712, JULY 13, 1995
Re:Petition of Al Argosino to take the Lawyer's Oath, Bar Matter
72, March 19, 1997
PURISIMA BARBA, complainant, vs. HECTOR S. PEDRO, respondent.
AM. No. 545-SBC December 26, 1974
No.
Application under §4 of R 138 (cf. 85)
In Re: Petition of Ramon Quisumbing for admission to the Bar
Bar Matter No. 419 (Nov. 1989)
§7-16 Application, Examinations and Passing Average
‘Admission to the Bar; judgment; SC exclusive power; practice of law is privilege, not
right; etc.
In Re: Lanuevo, Aug. 29 1975
In Re: Cunanan, 94 Phil. 534
$17-9 Admission and Oath, Certificate, Atty’s Roll (Jul 3 1996)
§21-6,31-7 Authority to Appear, Compensation, Atty's Lien
Authority to bind clients
cf. Guiang v. Antonio, 218 SCRA 381 and
Legarda v. Court of Appeals, 209 SCRA 722
Legarda v. CA 195 SCRA 418
SMC v. Laguesma, 236 S 595R No. 116208, July 5, 1996
. 193 SCRA 59°
panzas v. TAC 204 SCRA 304:
Aguila v. CFI Batangas 160 SCRA 352;
Pulido v. CA, 122 SCRA 63;
Aylion v. Sevilla 156 SCRA 257 (L-79244)
Tesoro v. CA, 54 SCRA 296
Salonga v . CA 269 SCRA 534
Quantum Meruit
In Re Testate Estate of Dofa Gabina Raquel. Vicente J. Francisco v.
Aurea Matias G.R. No. L-16349. January 31, 1964.]
Unlawful retention of funds and charging liens
Tafiada v. Court of Appeals, Oct. 23, 1985
Nasser v. Cuevas, 188 SCRA 812
Armovit v. Court of Appeals, 202 SCRA 16
Authority to appear for government
Orbos v. Civil Service Commission, 189 SCRA 459
Gonzales v. Chavez, 205 SCRA 815
§20, 27-30 Duties of Attorneys, Suspension and Removal.
Guiang v. Antonio, id
Legarda v. Court of Appeals, id.
Keld Stemmerick v. Atty. Leonuel Mas, AC No. 8010, June 16,2009
Teodoro Regala, et al. v. Sandiganbayan, Republic of the Philippines
EN BANC [G.R. No. 105938. September 20, 1996]
include separate opinions
Luisa ¥, Ortega v. CA, G.R, No. L-43155. August 14, 1987
Guevarra v. Eala, AC No. 7136, August 1, 2007
Different modes of investigation
Rule 139-B
Fernandez v. Grecia, AM No. 3694, June 17, 1993
Cf. Yuseco v. DCA Bernad, AM No. 94-1-061-SC, March 29, 1995
Barrientos v. Daarol, AC No. 1512, January 29, 1993
Balaoing v. Calderon, AM No. RTJ-90-580, April 27, 1993
Bautista v. Gonzales 182 SCRA 151
Zaldivar v. Sandiganbayan G.R. No. 79690-707, Feb. 1, 1989
Narag v. Narag AC No. 3405, June 29, 1998
Bildner and lusorio v. Erlinda usorio, G.R. No. 157384, 5 June 20092. Rule 138-A, Student Practice Rule (Circular No.19, Dec, 19, 1986)
3. Rule 139 The Integrated Bar of the Philippines
In re Integration of the Philippine Bar, 49 SCRA 22 (1973)
In re IBP Elections. 178 SCRA 398 (1989)
Power of the Court to defend itself
In re Emil Jurado — (243 SCRA 299 (1995)] administrative matter, disciplined as
lawyer .
In re Tulfo - AM 90-4-1545-0 contempt proceeding
‘What is the practice of law?
Cayetano v. Monsod, GR No. 110113, September 3, 1991
Mauricio Ulep v. The Legal Clinic, Inc.
EN BANC [Bar Matter No. 553. June 17, 1993.]
Alawi v. Alauya, AM No. SDC-97-2-P, February 24, 1997
Lawyer as policy-maker
See Article by Evelyn Ursua, published in the Phil. Law Journal