CLU 3MI MOCK TRIALS Name

DATES Date
Her Majesty The Queen against don Von Chovi May 22-23, 2018
Crown Defence
– Lawyer #1 Nate Tozer – Lawyer #1 Justin Goebel
– Lawyer #2 Gavin Squires – Lawyer #2 Aaron Raine
– Lawyer #3 Alandra Zimmermann – Lawyer #3 Jaxon Moore
Police Constable Alan Rose – Ryan Beemer Fran Goodheart - Sam Cooper
Nicky Jagger – Mikaylah Corbett- Litschgy Accused Von Chovi - Daniel Teixeira

Her Majesty The Queen against

Crown Defence
Lawyer #1 – Nate Lawyer #1 – Justin
- Opening Statement - - Opening Statement -
- Cross Examination of - Don Von Chovi (Daniel) - Cross Examination of - Nicky Jagger (Mikaylah)
Lawyer #2 – Gavin Lawyer #2 – Aaron
- Direct Examination of - Constable Alan Rose (Ryan) - Direct Examination of - Don Von Chovi (Daniel)
- Cross Examination of - Fran Goodheart (Sam) - Cross Examination of - Constable Alan Rose (Ryan)

Lawyer #3 – Alandra Lawyer #3 – Jaxon

Direct Examination of – Nicky Jagger (Mikaylah) Direct Examination of – Fran Goodheart (Sam)
Closing Arguments – Closing Arguments –

Witness – Police Constable Alan Rose (Ryan) Witness – Fran Goodheart (Sam)
Witness – Nicky Jagger (Mikaylah) Accused – Don Von Chovi (Daniel)
You will receive a mark for the work that you hand in. At each stage, I will provide you with feedback and
suggestions that will help you to revise and improve your parts before the trial starts.

STAGE ONE DATES: Work periods: April 19th, 20th, 23rd (1/2 Class), 26th
The first stage of submission will be a preliminary draft due on Friday April 27th, 2018. At this stage, the
following must be submitted:
 opening statements (this should be done by the lawyer who will be doing the opening)
 direct examination questions and answers for each witness (this should be done together by the
lawyer and witness)
NOTE: It is recommended that you work as a group for the preliminary draft on this, but each member will be
responsible for one section specifically.

When putting your name on your submissions, set it up as follows in the TOP RIGHT CORNER of the page:
R. v. D. Von Chovi
Crown/Defence Opening Statement
Lawyer #1 – Student Name

OR

R. v. D. Von Chovi
Crown/Defence Direct Examination of Witness Name
Lawyer #1 or 2 – Student Name
Witness Name – Student Name
 Page 2

STAGE TWO DATES: : Work periods: April 26th, 27th, 30th

Crown evidence must be disclosed to the Defence at the start of class on Wednesday May 2nd, 2018.
Please make sure that your evidence is properly presented (i.e. make sure that it is “bagged and tagged”). You
will lose marks if you do not disclose the evidence at this time, and your evidence may be inadmissible in court
if you don’t disclose it in a timely fashion.
The second stage of submission will be a preliminary draft due on Wednesday May 2nd, 2018. At this stage,
the following must be submitted:
 closing statements (this should be done by the lawyer who will be doing the closing)
 cross examination questions with expected answers for each witness (this should be done by the
lawyer – do not talk to the other team’s witness!)
 anticipated cross-examination questions with your answers (this should be done by the witness – do
not talk to the other team’s lawyer!)
NOTE: It is recommended that you work as a group for the preliminary draft on this, but each member will be
responsible for one section specifically.

When putting your name on your submissions, set it up as follows in the TOP RIGHT CORNER of the page:
R. v. D. Von Chovi
Crown/Defence Closing Statement
Lawyer #2 – Student Name

OR

R. v. D. Von Chovi
Crown/Defence Cross Examination of Witness Name
Lawyer #1 or 2 – Student Name

OR

R. v. D. Von Chovi
Anticipated Cross Examination Questions of Witness Name
Witness Name – Student Name

FINAL SUBMISSION DATES: Update Work Periods May 3rd, May 9th
The final stage of submission will be the final draft due on Tuesday May 15th. A booklet will be provided for
each group . At this stage, the following must be submitted:
 a cover page showing the indictment (print the file from the website); put all team member’s names
and roles it in the top right corner
 opening statement
 direct examination questions with answers for witness 1
 anticipated cross-examination questions with your answers for witness 1
 direct examination questions with answers for witness 2
 anticipated cross-examination questions with your answers for witness 2
 cross examination questions with expected answers for witness 1 (other side)
 cross examination questions with expected answers for witness 2 (other side)
 closing statement
 any Certificate of Analysis sheets for evidence (use the file from the website; changing information as
needed)
CLU 3MI MOCK TRIALS Name
DATES Date
Her Majesty The Queen against Brogue May24th – 25th, 2018
Crown Defence
– Lawyer #1 – Ruth G – Lawyer #1 Tyler Pletz
– Lawyer #2 – Rachel Schiebel – Lawyer #2 Sydney Spears
– Lawyer #3 – Katie Lockey – Lawyer #3 Sevval Uyar
Police Officer Low – Josh Wilkinson Witness - Tom Brogue – Tyler Pletz
Witness – Sandra Volsky – Amarilis Yol Cano Witness – Bonnie Bragger – Alanna Manary
Petra Pomas – Rachel Schiebel Accused – Wally Brogue – Wes Edwards

Her Majesty The Queen against Brogue

Crown
Lawyer #1 – Ruth
- Opening Statement –
-Direct Examination of - Petra Pomas – Rachel Schiebel
- Cross Examination of - Tom Brogue – Tyler Pletz
Lawyer #2 – Rachel
- Direct Examination of- Officer Low – Josh Wilkinson
- Cross Examination of - Wally Brogue – Wes Edwards
Defence
Lawyer #1 – Tyler
- Opening Statement –
-Direct Examination of - Wally Brogue – Wes
- Cross Examination of - Petra Pomas – Rachel
Lawyer #2 – Sydney
- Direct Examination of - Tom Brogue – Tyler Pletz
- Cross Examination of - Officer Low – Josh

Lawyer #3 – Katie Lawyer #3 – Sevval

Direct Examination of – Sandra Volsky – Amarilis Y C Direct Examination of – Bonnie Bragger – Alanna
Cross Examination - Bonnie Bragger – Alanna Cross Examination - Amarilis Y C
Closing Arguments – Closing Arguments –

Witness – Police Officer Low – Josh Wilkinson Witness – Tom Brogue – Tyler Pletz
Witness – Sandra Volsky – Amarilis Yol Cano Witness – Bonnie Bragger – Alanna Manary
Witness – Petra Pomas – Rachel Schiebel Accused – Wally Brogue – Wes Edwards
You will receive a mark for the work that you hand in. At each stage, I will provide you with feedback and
suggestions that will help you to revise and improve your parts before the trial starts.
STAGE ONE DATES: Work periods: April 19th, 20th, 23rd (1/2 Class), 26th
The first stage of submission will be a preliminary draft due on Friday April 27th, 2018. At this stage, the
following must be submitted:
 opening statements (this should be done by the lawyer who will be doing the opening)
 direct examination questions and answers for each witness (this should be done together by the
lawyer and witness)
NOTE: It is recommended that you work as a group for the preliminary draft on this, but each member will be
responsible for one section specifically.

When putting your name on your submissions, set it up as follows in the TOP RIGHT CORNER of the page:
R. v. Brogue
Crown/Defence Opening Statement
Lawyer #1 – Student Name

OR

R. v Brogue
Crown/Defence Direct Examination of Witness Name
Lawyer #1 or 2 – Student Name
Witness Name – Student Name
 Page 2
STAGE TWO DATES: : Work periods: April 26th, 27th, 30th
Crown evidence must be disclosed to the Defence at the start of class on Wednesday May 2nd, 2018.
Please make sure that your evidence is properly presented (i.e. make sure that it is “bagged and tagged”). You
will lose marks if you do not disclose the evidence at this time, and your evidence may be inadmissible in court
if you don’t disclose it in a timely fashion.
The second stage of submission will be a preliminary draft due on Wednesday May 2nd, 2018. At this stage,
the following must be submitted:
 closing statements (this should be done by the lawyer who will be doing the closing)
 cross examination questions with expected answers for each witness (this should be done by the
lawyer – do not talk to the other team’s witness!)
 anticipated cross-examination questions with your answers (this should be done by the witness – do
not talk to the other team’s lawyer!)
NOTE: It is recommended that you work as a group for the preliminary draft on this, but each member will be
responsible for one section specifically.

When putting your name on your submissions, set it up as follows in the TOP RIGHT CORNER of the page:
R. v. Brogue
Crown/Defence Closing Statement
Lawyer #2 – Student Name

OR

R. v. Brogue
Crown/Defence Cross Examination of Witness Name
Lawyer #1 or 2 – Student Name

OR

R. v. Brogue
Anticipated Cross Examination Questions of Witness Name
Witness Name – Student Name

FINAL SUBMISSION DATES: Update Work Periods May 3rd, May 9th
The final stage of submission will be the final draft due on Tuesday May 15th. A booklet will be provided for
each group . At this stage, the following must be submitted:
 a cover page showing the indictment (print the file from the website); put all team member’s names
and roles it in the top right corner
 opening statement
 direct examination questions with answers for witness 1
 anticipated cross-examination questions with your answers for witness 1
 direct examination questions with answers for witness 2
 anticipated cross-examination questions with your answers for witness 2
 cross examination questions with expected answers for witness 1 (other side)
 cross examination questions with expected answers for witness 2 (other side)
 closing statement
 any Certificate of Analysis sheets for evidence (use the file from the website; changing information as
needed)