Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and neatness, well lighted and well watered. At the end of the
camp, nearest the Chauburji, are erected the Chief's quarters,
in front of which floats the Union Jack."
The Lawrence Statue.
In view of the more than local interest aroused by the agita-
tion against the Lawrence statue on the Lahore Mall, it may be
worth while to recall the circumstances connected with the incident
commemorated by the sculptor in designing the statue and '
placing on its base the inscription, " Will you be governed by
the pen or the sword ?" Also, to trace the Congress agitation
from its genesis to the present stage, more especially as the
unfortunate delay in dealing with the case promises to enshroud
the earlier stages of the controversy in the mists of antiquity.
In any case, readers who may have forgotten details published
from time to time, may be glad to have their memories refreshed
and, at the same time, to learn what the present situation is.
It was in 1848, after the suppression of the rebellion of the
Kangra hill chiefs, that Mr. Robert Cust, Deputy Commissioner
of that district, acting under the orders of John Lawrence, then in
charge of the recently acquired Trans-Sutlej territory, issued his
famous proclamation which contained the following passage :—
" I have ruled this district three years by the sole agency of
the pen, and, if necessary, I will rule it by the sword."
In reporting how this proclamation was promulgated, Mr.
Cast explained that the headmen of the villages in the disaffected
parts of the district were " summoned " to meet us 'at different
points of our hasty march to grapple with the insurgents. At
each halting place they were assembled in scores, and when a
sword and a pen were placed before them to select the instru-
ment by which they wished to be ruled, the pen was grasped
with enthusiasm."
Here we have a full account of the incident in Mr. Lust's
own words, and it would appear from his reference to the policy
pursued by him during his Deputy. Commissionership that, as a
matter of fact, it was Mr. Oust, not John. Lawrence, who was
the real author of the pen and sword phrase. Mr. Oust merely
illustrated his own policy, past and future, by converting it into
a simple object lesson. to suit the occasion when addressing the
assembled villagers. The incident is dealt with in Chapter III of
Sir Charles Aitchison's Life of Lord Lawrence (" Rulers of India "
series), but is not mentioned in the biographies by Bosworth-
Smith, Sir Richard Temple or Captain L. J. Trotter.
OLD LAHORE. 37
However, the well-known phrase was inscribed on the base
of the statue by the sculptor, Sir Edgar Boehm, more, perhaps,
as indicating the general policy adopted by Lawrence for main-
taining law and order in those troublous times, than as an actual
utterance of that great man. The statue was presented to the
Lahore Municipality by the sculptor, and the unveiling ceremony
was performed by the then Lieutenant-Governor, Sir Charles
Aitchison, on March 30, 1887.
Thus, then, the statue had been occupying its present site
for nearly 25 years before any one seems to have thought of taking
objection to it. About 1911 a vague proposal was put forward
in the local municipality that the statue should be removed to
another site. The proposal was not seriously pressed, and the
Deputy Commissioner (the late Mr. R. Humphries) merely recorded '
that the Lieutenant-Governor (Sir Louis Dane) had agreed to
leave the statue where it was. Agitation on the subject did not
really start until nine years later when one of the Congress party
raised the question in a speech at a provincial conference at
Rohtak in the autumn of 1920. The cue was taken up in the
Municipal Committee, and one of the members determined to
put it on record that the commemoration by the sculptor of a
historical incident that occurred more than 70 years ago was a
standing insult to the " national " feelings of the residents of
Lahore in particular and of India in general. Therefore, at a
General Meeting of the Municipal Committee held on November
13, 1920, this member moved a resolution for the defacement of the
" insulting " inscription. It would be idle to deny that, thanks to
the energy of the Congress party, the agitation grew apace and a
request that was at one time limited to the defacement' of the
inscription was raised to a demand for removal of the statue,
coupled in some quarters with the condition that its re-erection
anywhere in India should be prohibited.
On October 8, 1921, the General Committee passed a reso-
lution to the effect that (1) the statue should be removed ;
(2) that, as a temporary arrangement, it should be removed to the
Town Hall bdildings for storage ; and (3) that a sub-committee
should be appointed to consider " the final disposal of the statue."
The first two parts of this resolution were promptly suspended'
by the Commissioner, who referred the matter to Government for
orders,' The Government then raised the question as to whether
the Committee had the right to interfere with " trust " property,
and that body appointed a special sub-committee to report on
this and other points dealt with in the Government letter. Thi
sub-committee maintained that the statue was an " out and out