ANNEX 11 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION

School Profile Description Remarks Period of Data Presentation Data

Reporting Source/
Forms
1. Enrolment ● Total number of learners enrolled From 2017, the Mid-year Enrolment By Gender SF-1:
o By gender number of both the (BoSY data) School
o Last 3 years male and female Register
enrollees significantly Year-end ; EBEIS
SY TOTAL BOYS GIRLS increased. (EoSY data)
2017-2018 3324 1801 1523
2018-2019 3505 1905 1600
2019-2020 3425 1834 1591

2. Health and In the beginning of Mid-year Number Of Learners By Health Status, Nutrition
N WASTED SW OW OBESE
nutritional SY 2019-2020, 27 % Year-end SY 2019-2020 al Status
Kinder 306 98 26 4 3
status Grade 1 343 104 28 6 12 (916 of 3425) of the Report/S
Grade 2 370 77 52 23 19 learners fall outside chool
Grade 3 277 61 29 25 12 the normal health Records
Grade 4 371 46 9 39 7 status.
Grade 5 411 52 17 30 5
Grade 6 431 66 15 39 12
Total 2,509 504 176 166 70
3. Learners SUBJECT AREA TOTAL At the end of the Year-end Learners’ Materials SF-3:
materials* ENGLISH 2542 school year, there Books
FILIPINO 2173 was a shortage of Issued
MATH 3023 textbooks in the and
MTB 1293 Grades 5 and 6 level. Returned
; Physical
MAPEH 2791
Count of
AP 2186 Inventori
ESP 2688 es/
SCIENCE 1278 School
EPP/TLE 1021 Property
Custodia
n
Records
4. Teachers’ ● Number of teachers who attended With GBES’ thrive Mid-year Accompl
professional training/further studies to promote teacher Year-end ishment
development* ● By kind/type of professional quality, the school Report/
development (e.g. ICT, Further studies, conducts LACs and School
INSET, LAC, etc) INSETs per subject Records
● Current year area, the teachers
TRAININGS/SEMINARS TOTAL are also encouraged
GAD 3 to attend externally
sponsored seminars
DIVISION TRAININGS 8
for personal
DSLAC 12 development.
SLAC 18
NATIONAL 0
INTERNATIONAL 3
5. Funding ● Funding amount and sources The biggest source Mid-year Financia
sources* (MOOE, LGU, canteen, donors, etc.) of school funding this Year-end l reports;
● Current year school year come Monthly
Amount Fund Source from the donations, MOOE
141,000 School MOOE MOOE and canteen. liquidatio
100,000 Subsidy for Special The funds raised by n reports
Programs the Brigada Team,
100,000 Local Government Unit
SPG and GPTA
funds
500,000.00 Canteen funds supported the school
2,176,989.00 Donations projects and
programs.

6. School ● Top 3 awards/ recognition from Through the years Mid-year Accompl
awards and award-giving bodies duly recognized by ,GBES’ thrust to Year-end ishment
recognitions DepEd improve the school’s report/
performance has School
2018 District Schools Press in English and Filipino paved the way for Records
Winners
Feature Writing Category both the pupils and
Copy Reading and Headline News Writing Winner the faculty to achieve
Editorial Writing Winner recognition for their
2018 Division Press Conference in Schools and outstanding
Filipino accomplishments.
2018 Municipal AP Festival of Talents, Quiz Bee,
Poster Making
2018 Division Araling Panlipunan Festival of Talents:
Quiz Bee Winners
2018 Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementers Brigada Coordinator
2018 Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementer
1st Place 2018 District Search for Brigada Eskwela
Best Implementer
1st Place Drum and Lyre Parade Competition 2018
1st Place Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementers for Mega School
SM UN Celebration Champion : Most Number of
Participants
*Data not found in the EBEIS
 Data
Performance Period of Data Pres4
Description Remarks Source/
Indicators Reporting ` xentation
Forms
ACCESS
7. Number and ● Count and percentage of learners who At the end of SY Year-end SF-4:
rate of do not finish a particular grade level. (It 2018-2019, 58 out Monthly
dropouts by does not capture learners who finish a of 3365 pupils Learner’s
cause grade level but do not enrol in the next dropped out. The Movement
grade level the following school year) main causes of the and
● Look at the five (5) major causes of problem are Attendanc
dropout in the school financial e; SF-2:
reason/poverty and Daily
Number of Dropouts by Cause(Current SY) the distance of Attendanc
school from home. e Report
Financial Matters 20 The school of
Health and Nutrition 4 congregated to Learners;
Child Labor 2 implement the best EBEIS
Distance of school from Home 10 DORP practices to
Lack of Interest 7 arrest the number
Others 10 of SARDOs for the
attainment of the
EFA goals.

QUALITY
8. Percentage ● Percentage of learners who completed At the end of the Year-end EBEIS:
of learners the school year school year, the Enrolme
● Number of promoted learners over
who number of total learners x 100
promotional rate nt data;
completed ● Per grade level was maintained SF-6:
the School ● Current year at the primary Summar
Year Grade Level % levels with 100%. ized
(Promotion Kinder 100 There are only 7 Report
Grade 1 101
Rate) Grade 2 100
out of 3365 on
Grade 3 106 pupils who did Promoti
Grade 4 98 not get promoted on and
Grade 5 99 to the next level. Level of
Grade 6 99 Proficien
cy
9. National ● MPS per subject In the last Year-end Report
Achievement ● Grade 6 results for complete schools quarterly test for from
Test (NAT) – ● Current year SY 2018-2019, school
by Mean the pupils Coordin
Lev SY Before Previous SY: 16-17
Percentage el performed well in ators
Score (MPS) Engli Filipi Ma Scien AP Filipino, Science
sh no th ce
Gra 66.0 71.53 65. 66.47 68.90 and Araling
de 6 9 14 Panlipunan.
Leve Previous SY: 17-18 Interventions
l
Engli Filipi Ma Scien AP were proposed to
sh no th ce remedy the
Gra 66.5 70.75 68. 68.49 73.92
de 6 4 86 alarming result in
Leve Current SY: 18-19 the Mathematics
l and English
Engli Filipi Ma Scien AP
sh no th ce areas.
Gra 68.4 73.24 72. 74.73 72.54
de 6 2 35

10. Literacy ● Total number of learners who are PHIL-IRI results Mid-year Philippin
level in the frustration, instructional, and show an Year-end e
independent levels for English and alarming high Informal
Filipino (oral and silent reading) number of Reading
● Should show pre and post test nonreaders in the Inventor
results intermediate y (PHIL-
● If PHIL-IRI is used, will cover levels. It means IRI);
grades 2-6 only that the Reading McCall-
● Current year Team will Crab
purposely focus Reading
ENGLISH FILIPINO on administering Compre
Reading Pre Post Pre Post
Frustration 197 100 243 76 immediate hension
Instructional 34 64 123 140 actions to Examina
Independent 231 276 92 242
decrease if not tion or
arrest the said its
numbers of equivale
nt
 frustration
readers.

GOVERNANCE
11. School- ● School level based on SBM SBM Year-end 1 - DEVELOPING SBM
Based Assessment Assessment Assess
Management Result was 1- ment
Assessment 1 -- DEVELOPING Developing.
Level
12. Child- ● Survey to be accomplished by the GBES is a child Year-end Points and status Child-
Friendly School Planning Team friendly school Friendly
Action Items /
School ● Based on CFSS point system: according to the Goals
13 School
Survey o 25-29 points: Child-Friendly result of the Progress toward Self-
11
result* School conducted SFS Targets Assess
o 30-34 points: Outstanding Survey. TOTAL SCORE 26 ment
Child-Friendly School
 35 and above points: Very 26 – CHILD FRIENDLY SCHOOL
Outstanding Child-Friendly School

Action Items / Goals 13

Progress toward Targets 11
TOTAL SCORE 26

26 – CHILD FRIENDLY SCHOOL

13. VOLUNTEER HOURS Over the years, Mid-year Attenda

Stakeholders’ CONTEST 52 the stakeholders Year-end nce
participation* SCOUTING 60 of GBES have sheets;
ASSEMBLIES 25 been but amiable DepEd
BRIGADA ESKWELA 27,005 and supportive to order
DRUM & LYRE 60 all the programs 18:
OFF CAMPUS 13 and projects of School
EDUC SUMMIT 20 the school. Calenda
ORIENTATION 23 r
 CLOSING PROGRAM 5

VOLUNTEER CASH
CONTEST 1500
SCOUTING 5000
BRIGADA ESKWELA 804,928.00
DRUM & LYRE 1,500
OFF CAMPUS 31,000
ACTIVITIES
CLOSING PROGRAM 10,000
14. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of With the Year-end SF-7:
Teacher ratio learners to teachers against the increase in School
standard: enrolment and Personn
o Kinder (25:1) GBES’ having el
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) deployed 11 new Assignm
o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) teachers this June ent List
● Per grade level 2019, only the
● Current year and
Grade 2 level’s
class size is bigger Basic
Grade Teachers Ratio than the Profile;
49 recommended SF-1:
Kinder 9 pupil-teacher ratio. School
41 Register
Grade 1 12
49 ; EBEIS
Grade 2 11
34
Grade 3 12
34
Grade 4 14
29
Grade 5 18
29
Grade 6 19
15. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of GBES’ Year-end EBEIS:
Classroom learners to classrooms against the Kindergarten to Facilities
ratio standard: Grade 6 class size and
o Kinder (25:1) is bigger than the Structur
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) recommended es
 o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) pupil-classroom
o SHS (40:1) ratio.
● Per grade level This means that
● Current year many classrooms
are still
Kindergarten 437 16 27 overcrowded.
Grade 1 493 10 49
Grade 2 541 10 54
Grade 3 404 10 40
Grade 4 477 10 47
Grade 5 517 12 43
Grade 6 556 12 46

16. Learner-  Comparison of the actual ratio of There are not Year-end EBEIS:
Toilet ratio learners to functional toilets enough toilets to Facilities
against standards (50:1) accommodate all and
 Total number students. It is a Structur
 By gender taxing job to es
 Current year maintain an
acceptable
Male Female cleanliness level
1834 63:1 1591 59:1 of the bathrooms.
 17. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of There are Year-end Consolid
Seat ratio learners to seats against the currently not ated
standard (1:1) enough seats for Report
● Total number all our students. on
● Current year Desk/Ar
mchairs
for ES
and SS;
EBEIS

Note: CFS – Child-Friendly School (The Child-Friendly School Assessment was made by UNICEF. The concept for establishing a Child-Friendly
School System (CFSS) in the Philippines was introduced in 1999 and is currently being reviewed so it can be utilized/integrated in school
planning, monitoring and evaluation).
SF – School Forms
*Data not found in the EBEIS
 Status of
Period of Data
School Description Remarks Data Presentation Source/Forms
Reporting
Projects
18. Status of ● The progress of CI projects The recently Mid-year School
Annual ● Data sets may differ depending on concluded Year-end Records/
Implementati what the school wants to present reading Project Team
on Plan ● Current year intervention Records/Annu
(AIP)/Continu program helped al
ous Project Title Target 115 non-readers Accomplishme
Improvement Actual in Grade 3 and 34 nt Report
(CI) Projects* Status/Accomplishments Grade Two pupils
moved a step
higher from their
Star 138 115 83% current reading
Yaman 39 34 87% level.
Lingap 629 484 77%

19. Other ● Reports done by other stakeholders ● The school Mid-year

stakeholders on their initiatives/activities may choose the Year-end SOURCE: School
’ independent from the PIA/CI projects top 3 stakeholder Records/
accomplishm (e.g. activities of the SGC, SPG/SSG, accomplishments/ Accomplishment
ents* etc.) initiatives/activitie reports of SPG,
● Data sets may differ depending on s GPTA, CI Team
the initiatives/activities of the Records
stakeholders
● Current year

Cash Donation
BE Stakeholders 1,706,988.50
GPTA 450,000
C.I Project 10,000