2.

In your own perception, in what way does each member contributed to the project implementation
and writing of the paper?

**Gemvie – Gemvie is a hardworking student and a mother. She has contributed a many things for the
success of the action research. Although she was not there during the lesson plan implementation at La
Salle Academy. She did the conceptual framework of the papers. She edited grammar. She did photo
and video analysis. She proofread the papers. She made it possible to meet the deadline despite Jeva is
having some concerns with her ill mother.

**Ariel – Ariel is a committed student. There is one time we talk about our status of this course. We
were afraid of you because we are not sure if we can pass this course and earn a good marks. And I
really saw him working very hard for the success of this action research from the start to the binding of
the book. He ask for the approval of the principal thru the letter we send to LSA. He does the
observations during the implementation. He works on the writing of the methodology. He did some
photo and video analysis. He gave feedbacks on messenger. And he also initiated the binding of the
book.

**Jeva – Jeva is the overall leader of the action research implementation. She does many things in the
writing of the paper. She initiated the topic of the lesson plan. She has guided me on what to do about
the making of the abstract and the infographics. She has a good command of the group. She is
communicated her ideas to me on email. She shared all the docs of the action research so I can also pen
my words to the paper. She distributed well the task of the group.

The implementation of the open-approach action research of this course that we did will not be possible
without the efforts, dedication and leadership of my classmates. Indeed, I learned very well and I can
use this for my future researches.

2. In your own perception, in what way does each member contributed to the project implementation
on “developing computational thinking” lesson plan?

Working as a team of in our MathEd240, we did a success. We give our time, money, effort,
communicating one another, skills in computers, helping which is lacking, and pushing each one
especially when we were on Kapatagan National High School. Indeed, each one has contributed, to wit:
**Jemvie – She is the leader of the group. She initiated the place where we can implement the lesson
plan. We did brainstorming on CED lobby about what activity to be use on the lesson plan. She used her
lesson plan template and it was totally new to me. But she did not communicate to us about the making
of the book. She did all the writing and we just send our photos, videos, articles to support the paper,
reflections, and some ideas.

**Ariel – He is hardworking. He loves what he does - he has a good skill on computers. He was the one
who taught and introduce the Scratch to the Grade 8 students. He has a good introduction but in the
middle of the implementation because students vary in game ideas, he and the rest was stuck on how to
resolve it. Until we just suggest to students to make a simple game and we arrived a result.

**Dharel – He is down-to-earth. Sometimes I get offended when he speaks with raise voice. He is with
Ariel on putting the concepts of the lesson plan. He did the observations and give time, effort, and
money to make it thru. Honestly, he also has difficulties but he tried to manage the software.

**Rohanie – She also has dedication of the course. I ask her one time that she already have some
background of the Scratch software and she shared her game to the group of students she were
observing. Indeed, it worked out. She really insisted that she will join with the group on the
implementing the lesson plan at Kapatagan National High School (because she/we wanted to passed this
course). And indeed, she does observations, reflections, and giving her ideas with the group.

Without them, the lesson plan implementation of “developing computational thinking” to students is
made possible. Indeed, worth the learing.