Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Management
COURSE GUIDE
2019-2020
CONTENTS
Overview
Key Staff
Programme Content
Assessment
Results
Submission of Coursework
Plagiarism
Timetable
Marking Criteria
2
Overview
The course aims to teach the science and practice of occupational health, safety and environmental
control in the context of a team approach. It recognises the increasing demand from both industry
and enforcement bodies to integrate occupational health, safety and environmental issues.
Taught modules (mixture of day and block release) in year 1 and major project in year 2
Taught modules only in one year (mixture of day and block release).
3
Key Staff
Course Leader
Dr Surindar Dhesi S.K.Dhesi@bham.ac.uk
Room 229, Public Health Building
Tel. 0121 414 7751
Course Administrator
Val Walker gees-pgtadmin@contacts.bham.ac.uk
1st Floor, LES Hub
0121 414 3077
Module Leaders
Safety Technology
Dr. Ian Litchfield, I.Litchfield@bham.ac.uk
Room 116, Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Tel: 0121 414 6006
4
Programme Content
TAUGHT ELEMENTS
Separate module guides containing detailed timetables, assessment and reading list information for
each will be provided at the beginning of all modules and available on Canvas.
RESEARCH ELEMENTS
Students are to submit a 1500-2000 word proposal detailing a proposed piece of research which the
student intends to carry out for their dissertation or research paper.
Students on the MSc will undertake a Dissertation based on his or her own independent research.
It must include an element of individual research, which tests a particular hypothesis or answers
specific research questions. It will include the collection, analysis, and interpretation of novel data
or a systematic review.
The report is required to be scholarly, relevant, ethically sound, and set in the context of current
knowledge. It may be submitted in a traditional dissertation format or a shorter research paper
format. Formal approval must be given by the Head of Division, with a nominated Academic
member of staff allocated to supervise the project, before any detailed work can commence. More
detailed guidance will be issued to students during the Research Methods teaching.
Assessment
This is a summary of the assessment and full details are given in the guide for
each module
PART-TIME STUDENTS
Year 1 – assignments are identical for both 1st year MSc and Postgraduate Diploma candidates
and will comprise the following:
Taught Modules Three modules are assessed by course work (which may take the form of an
essay, case study, practical or other) plus an exam. The remaining modules are assessed by
coursework only. Deadline dates are clearly communicated at the beginning of each module.
6
The pass mark for all assessments is 50%. The overall marks for the option modules will be
weighted 50% - exam; 50% - coursework, unless indicated on the module guide
Students who successfully complete the above will be awarded a Postgraduate Diploma unless they
wish to proceed to study for an MSc.
A 1500-2000 word proposal is to be submitted detailing a proposed piece of research which the
student intends to carry out for their Dissertation. The module is assessed by means of a traditional
long format dissertation or research paper. All MSc students sit a viva voce (oral) examination.
The pass mark for the MSc is 50%; MSc with merit is 60% (if the dissertation is 60% or greater);
and MSc with distinction is an average mark of 70% (if the dissertation is 70% or greater). Full
details of the requirements for diploma and MSc are given in the University Regulations which are
available on the University website.
FULL-TIME STUDENTS
Assessment is identical to the above, with Year 1 and Year 2 assessments undertaken concurrently.
Results
Marks will be released to students in the form of grades as follows
70%+ Distinction
60% - 69% Merit
50% - 59% Pass
Below 50% Fail
Please note all marks are provisional until ratified by the Board of Examiners which will meet
in October 2019.
Submission of Coursework
All coursework must be word processed, NOT handwritten.
Course work should be submitted typed/word processed, and double spaced. A reasonable font size
must be used (min.12).
Extensions to deadline are not permitted except in exceptional circumstances. All requests for
extensions must be through the Course Leader. Forms can be obtained from Mrs Valerie Walker.
Extenuating Circumstances (e.g. medical conditions or personal problems which might affect
coursework or examinations) will be discussed by a Committee immediately before the Board of
Examiners meeting in order to guide their decision. Extenuating Circumstances must be provided
as soon as possible. Both a form explaining the circumstances and written evidence must be
provided. These can be discussed with the course leader or simply given to the course administrator
for later consideration. The forms can be obtained from Mrs Valerie Walker.
Failure to submit by the required date will result in the imposition of the penalties. For every
working day late, 5% will be deducted from the mark given. For instance, a piece of
coursework to be submitted on the Friday and subsequently marked at 72% is actually submitted on
the Monday. The coursework is given 67% (from distinction to merit). Clearly late submission can
have significant impacts on the assessment.
Plagiarism
Issues of plagiarism and collusion are taken extremely seriously by the University and a range of
penalties apply when it is discovered up to and including withholding of the degree.
Plagiarism is the use without acknowledgement of another person’s work, with the intention of
passing it off as your own. This applies equally whether the work in question is published in a
book, the internet, whether it is the work of another student or whether it is your own previous
work. Plagiarism is effectively intellectual theft. Collusion is the sharing of assessment-specific
work, with the intention of disguising what is essentially one piece of collaborative work as two
pieces of independent work. Further details on issues of plagiarism and collusion can be found at
the Academic office website: http://www.as.bham.ac.uk/study/support/sca/plagguide.shtml.
The University has software called TURNITIN, which will allow a checking of potentially
plagiarised information. All assignments must be submitted to TURNITIN via Canvas to be
checked for plagiarism. Students risk a zero mark and being subject to formal disciplinary
procedures if plagiarism is confirmed.
The University has a formal system to investigate and discipline any postgraduate students involved
in Plagiarism. Information on this can be found on: http://www.as.bham.ac.uk/sca/plagiarism/
8
Illness and Medical Evidence
University policy on illness and medical evidence has recently changed, the following guidelines
apply. These are split into two categories: a) arrangements for normal periods of study and b)
arrangements during examinations and times of significant assessment.
a) For minor/short-term illnesses (totalling less than 10 days in any academic year) students should
complete a self-certificate and forward it to their personal tutor as soon as possible. If illness
exceeds 10 days in any academic year the student is expected to produce a medical certificate from
their GP for any subsequent illness. This documentation may support short extensions for
submission of work (depending on when illness occurs) but otherwise carry little weight with
regard to impact on the overall degree.
c) For a more serious illness that lasts more than 7 consecutive days students should obtain a
medical certificate from their doctor. These certificates will carry significant weight with regard to
impact on the overall degree.
d) For prolonged or ongoing problems students may also need to request a medical certificate
depending on the impact on their studies. These certificates will also carry significant weight with
regard to impact on the overall degree and may allow alteration of the study programme when
required without further medical evidence.
Students will be expected to provide a medical certificate for any form of illness at these times and
to make their personal tutor/supervisor aware of the impact that they believe this illness has had on
their performance in the assessment. This information should be provided as soon as possible.
Notes:
b) Sponsored students should check whether or not their sponsor requires information about any
periods of absence and inform their personal tutors of the outcome. A release form will be provided
for students to sign to allow the University to communicate this information to the sponsor if this is
deemed necessary.
c) Students required to withdraw temporarily from their programme of study on medical grounds
will be required to produce a medical note before resuming their studies.
9
Timetables
An overall timetable for the year is enclosed. Timetables for all modules and contents of individual
lectures etc. can be found in the individual module guides. These are issued at the commencement
of each module and will give the following information.
Staff list
Learning outcomes
Lecture programme
Assessment details
Reading lists
10
Generic Marking Criteria: Essays and Examinations – MSc Programmes
The criteria listed below are commonly used in the assessment of essays and examinations. In those cases
where other criteria are utilised, these will be provided in advance by the relevant member of staff.
These criteria are given for guidance only. They are not intended as a rigid marking scheme as students’
work may match some criteria from one band and some from another. The criteria given demonstrate what
is typically expected in any one band. Examiners will use their professional judgment to award the overall
mark. Depending on the nature of the assessment only a subset of the criteria may apply. These criteria are
used for essays, coursework, exams, and dissertation, unless indicated otherwise.
11
69-60 A substantive and cogent answer.
Scores highly with respect to most criteria 1-7 but with slippage in one or more areas.
Answer covers most of the material of relevance to the question.
Structure/presentation must be sound.
Includes the most important points given in the course accurately and with good understanding.
Evidence of knowledge from relevant outside reading/additional material.
Shows breadth and depth of thought
19-10 Little of value – one major or a small number of minor points in note form which may be just relevant.
Fails to address the question.
9-1 Virtually nothing of value – maybe one or two very minor points, phrases or words that are barely
relevant.
Very limited/No evidence of understanding the question.
12