RUBRIC GUIDE for Peer Rating of Equipment Design Presentation

Rate the Group Presentation using the suggested whole number Points; multiply by 2 or 3 as needed. Write the scores on the rightmost and get the Total Rating.

Performance Indicator Professional Quality Adequate Needs Improvement Inadequate

Present a technical report
Use presentation time appropriately
Effective Use of visual aids – (PPT)
Understand design objective,
operation, limitations & safety
Determine / collect physical, chemical
and transport properties of process
fluids to be used in the equipment
Select a suitable equipment material of
construction
Apply chemical engineering process
calculations such as mass and energy
balances
Apply chemical engineering technical
design calculations such as theoretical
or heuristics design
Demonstrate design of chemical
engineering equipment auxiliaries
Demonstrate a design innovation
Group Members’ Response to
Questions
Overall impact of Presentation
(4 points)
Presenter is well prepared, good voice
projection No notes. Smooth delivery
Oral presentation started and ended on
time. Equal distribution of time
PowerPoint slide format is professional
with excellent graphics, animation and
clear content
Superior understanding of equipment
operation and safe practices
All required fluid/solids properties are
determined / collected very accurately
and correlation is clearly indicated
Accurately selected based on process
properties and economics
Mass and energy balances are accurate
and supported by reasonable
assumptions; these are summarized in
schematic diagrams
Design calculations are used intensively
and very accurately using theoretical
Design parameters taken in previous
ChE Courses
Auxiliaries are clearly and very
accurately demonstrated
Innovation is novel, creative and
valid
Responds appropriately; is able to
explain and interpret accurately
Excellent / Very Good
(3 points)
Presenter is prepared. Some problems
with voice projection. Some glancing on
notes. Mumbling, too memorized.
Oral presentation is not on time : +/- 5
minutes. Time distribution is not equal
PowerPoint slide format is good and
readable with sufficient graphics
Good understanding of equipment
operation and safe practices
Fluid / solids properties are adequately
determined / collected and correlation
is indicated
Accurately selected based on process
properties
Mass and energy balances are
adequate with few unreasonable
assumptions in calculations; these are
summarized in block diagrams
Design calculations are used
adequately and accurately using
heuristics and theoretical design taken
in previous ChE Courses
Equipment design auxiliaries are
adequately demonstrated
Innovation is not so new, some
creativity and validity
Able to explain and interpret
answers but somewhat incomplete
Good and Acceptable
(2 points)
Presenter is not much prepared. Poor
voice projection. Too much glancing at
notes. Some reading PPT guide notes
Oral presentation is not on time : +/- 10
minutes. Poor time distribution
PowerPoint slide format is not so good
and readable with unclear content and
few graphics
Errors in understanding of equipment
operation or safe operation
Some fluid/solids properties are
missing or correlation may be missing
Adequately selected based on process
properties
Mass and energy balances are not
clearly indicated
Design calculations are not accurate
and clearly indicated and used a lot of
shortcut calculations
Equipment design auxiliaries are
partially demonstrated
Innovation is not creative and not
valid
Misunderstands questions and has
some trouble answering
Acceptable with minor revisions
(1 points)
Presenter is not prepared. Reading of
notes or ppt slides. Voice too soft to be
understood
Oral presentation is not on time: +/- 15
minutes. Very poor time distribution
PPT slides are bad, contain too much
text, confusing, no graphics
No understanding of how equipment
works or safe operations
Fluid/solids properties are missing or
unrealistic
Not adequately selected
Process calculations are missing and/or
wrongly applied
Erroneous application of design
principles yielding in unreasonable
solution. Used unreasonable heuristic
data
No auxiliaries are shown in
equipment design
No Innovation
Does not provide an appropriate
answer or none at all
Very Poor / Needs Improvement

Prototype (10 Pts) Very Creative, Technically complete (7 Pts) Moderate Creativity, (5 Pts) Some creativity is (3 Pts) Does not look like the (0 pts) No Prototype
features , looks very much like its model features are almost complete, Good shown. Poor replica of a equipment depicted, many
equipment diagram, well labeled with replica, labels are provided with prototype. Most features are features are lacking, No labels
complete explanation of features some explanation of features present, Labels are provided
 Peer Rating Sheet for Equipment Design Presentation
Instructions: Write your rating for the presenters here. Have this signed by your teacher (ERL or LBP) at the end of the period.
Upload your rating in the Peer Rating Link in the Course Website after which submit this form back to ERLaurito.
NAME of Peer Evaluator __________________________________ Section__________ Group No.________ Date ___________
NAME of Presenter
Equipment Designed
Performance Indicator Rating SCORE Rating SCORE Rating SCORE Rating SCORE Rating SCORE Rating SCORE Rating SCORE Rating SCORE
Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2
Present a technical report

Use presentation time appropriately

Effective Use of visual aids – (PPT)

Understand design objective,
operation, limitations & safety
Use physical, chemical and transport
properties of process fluids to be
used in the equipment
Select a suitable equipment material
Apply chemical engineering process Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2
calculations such as mass and energy
balances
Apply chemical engineering technical Rating*3 Rating*3 Rating*3 Rating*3 Rating*3 Rating*3 Rating*3 Rating*3
design calculations such as
theoretical or heuristics design
Demonstrate design of chemical
engineering equipment auxiliaries
Demonstrate an Innovation in the
design
Group Members’ Response to Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2
Questions
Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2 Rating*2
Overall impact of Presentation

T O T A L
Prototype 10, 7, 5, 3, 0 