Professional Documents
Culture Documents
t
,r\
I
2) Classification of Actions:
a) According to cause/nature/foundation
b) According to place where instituted
c) According to the object.
D. Commencement of Actions - Section 5, Rule 1
/
t
2
9)Section6,Rule]Constluction_Liberalconstructioninorderto
,'lrrt ^.Gdy ?n9 inexpensive disposition
promote their objective of securing al' vs' CA' Pepsi' et' al '
of every action or proceeglry,, @miitbanfos'- et'
C a rto ,
rsrands ys Dando, G R No
177456,
ilrr{ ,l''{n: ?l?,1}0,r"_Court' held that:
Septeioei 4,, 2009, the Supieme
..Therearereasonsjustifyingthecourts.tosuspendstrict
life, liberty'
adherence to the procedurat
,ri"". such as, (a) matters of
(b) of
special or
compelling
honor or
property;
"*iit"n""case; (d) a cause not entirely
circumstances; (c) the merits'oi-flr" of favored by the
to the fault or neO-lrOe1l" ll:-Partv
attributable
(e) any showinq that it is merely
suspension oj tn"
"t"t;and O ir,"i""i itt"t tlt" oirt"t party will not
frivotous or ditatory;
-laik"of
be Prejudiced therebY'"
lnthecaseofLandBankofthePhilippinesys.Celada,479SCRA495' of
in" btinciple. oi tiO""iity of the rulesthe
502, theSupreme Court ,pptili just because
not to "r"n tn"
dismiss on i""nnicar.grounds
orocedure and
i"ii"Jto "ill
inOillle nis nott of Atiorneys' number which
is
counset tor petitiin"], is a membei of the court
or not'
even more irpo.trnt as it indicates?"ornsel
when lt held that:
..xxxontheotherhand,theJailureofcounseltoindicatehisRoll
J not -h"" sbeen
;;.pondent' substantive ri g hts'
of Attorneyr, n, i..i"i-*o J "ff;;t directed to
such that p"tit[;'';"ilun"9r;;ii rattrer ttran dismiss the
comply with the latter '"q'i'"'ilni
grounds'"
petition on p""ty technical
and again that cases
" x x x Moreover' we have held time after the
as poss-ib1e' Oe Olei"tmin"O on the merits
should, as much vintifate their causes and
parties nave Oeen gir"n
- tuff oppo,i,lnii,'io
or. some procedural
defenses, l"r,n-"i ih"n on' .technilality il;;; [rocedure are not
ends in
Rtilr i""nn'"d
imperfection'
oui are 'li'primarirv ofi["J t,i help in the proper and the
themsetves ln appropriate c€ses' therefore'
oispenlatiol of iusiice'
expedient in oii"t'to meet and advance the
rutes may b" ;;;;i;J riueratty
O4 manah lstamic lnvestment
ot suOstantial justic" t"i''tb
cause
phitippines ys. Ci|i'irii. iravel and Tours' lnc'' 436
Bank of the
scRA s56).
'!.:!;;tf,.f
'sitiago, rifififltii'r#qi::i*::;;ryiwwr
scRA457 744)'
splitting a effect of
sections 3 and 4 - one suit for a single cause 9_f^^action,
on the merits to any one
single cause ;",;; ti"l,ing ot onJ otludgment
"f
t
J
shall be a ground for the dismissal of the other. (litis pendentia or res
judicata.
a) Representative parties
b) Spouses
c) Minors or incompetent persons
d) Permissive parties
e) lndispensable parties (Lozano vs. Ballesferos, 195 SCRA 681)
0 Necessary parties
g) Class suit
h) Alternative defendants
i) Unknown defendants
j) Entity without juridical entity
k) lndigent party
a) Caption
b) Body
c) Signature and address
d) Verification
e) Certification against forum shopping - Purpose of the Rule; what
constitutes forum-shopping; test of forum shopping; sanctions against
forum shopping; effects of non-compliance;
0 Certificate of non-forum shopping should be signed by the party, not by
the counsel ( Far Eastern Shipping Co. vs. Court of Appeals, 297 SCRA
30; Five Sfar Bus Co., lnc. vs. Court of Appeals,373 SCRA 367).
(THE EXECUTIVE SECREIARY vs. 6ORDOru, G.R. No. 134171 November 16, 1998;
SAMAHAN /VG MGA MANGGAGAWA SA SAMMA.LAKAS SA INDUSTRIYA NG
KAPATIRANG HALIGING AIYANSA (SAMMA-LIKHA) vs. SAMMA CORPORATION, G.R.
No. 167141, March 13, 2009; MARANAW HOIETS A/VD RESORT CORP. vs. COURT OF
APPEALS, SHERYT OABEL AND MANILA RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORP., G.R. NO.
149660, January 20, 2009).
5
i) Loreta Torres, et. al vs. Specralized Packaging Dev. Corp., G.R. 149634,
July 6,2004.
Rule 14 - Summons
a) Who will issue summons; what are its contents; who will serve
summons and return; alias summons (Sections 1 to 5).
b) Personal service and substituted service of summons (Sections 6 and
7)
Rule 15 - Motions
Thus, in rnany cases, the Supreme Court has ruled that a motion that
does not contain a notice of hearing is but a mere scrap of paper' lf filed in
court it should be disregarded and ignored, and is not entitled to
judicial
cognizance. tt is not evln a motion for it does not comply with the rules,
hen"e, the clerk has no right to receive it- (Goldloop Propelres, lnc'
"nd
is. Cn, 212 SCRA 498, 504; Tiaders Royat Bank vs. CA, 208 SCRA 199'
205; Prado vs. Veridiano ll, 204 SCRA 654, 666)'
ln casa//a vs. People,3gl SCRA 344, 348, the supreme court held:
is useless piece of paper that will not toll the running of the
prescriptive period.
"This Court has indeed held time and time again that, under
Section 4 and 5 of Rule 15 of the Rules of Court, mandatory is the
notice requirement in a motion, which is rendered defective by failure
to comply with the requirement. As a rule, a motion without a notice of
hearing is considered pro forma and does not affect the reglementary
period for the appeal or the filing of the requisite pleading.
c) Proof of service required; motion day; omnibus motion; motion for leave
(Sections 6 to 9)
Rule 18 - Pre-trial
Rule 19 - lntervention
Rule 21 - Subpoena
a) When taken - with leave after jurisdiction over the defendant has been
obtained; without leave if jurisdiction over defendant has not been obtained
yet; scope of examination (Sections 1 and 2); Distinction between deposition
upon oral examination and deposition upon written interrogatories (Sections
15 and 25).
c) Persons before whom deposition is taken within the Phil. And in foreign
countries; distinction between commission and letters rogatory (Sections 1b,
11 and 12).
a) -
Deposition before action when and how filed; contents of petition,
notice and service, order and examination, reference to court and use
of deposition (Sections 1 to 6);
b) Deposition pending appeal (perpetuation of testimony) Section 7.
$ ln Lartada vs. CA, G.R. No. 102390; Nesf/e Phil., lnc. vs. CA, G.R. No.
102404, February 1, 2002 - May the counsel of a party for whom a written
request for admission is addressed under Section 1, Rule 26 answer such
request for his client? Yes.
d)
Rule 30 - Trial
ll
c) Kinds of judgments:
1)judgment for one or against one or more of several parties (Section 3);
c)Executionbymotionorbyindependentaction(Section6)
0 How to execute:
1) Money Judgment
2) Judgments for sPecific acts
3) Specialjudgments
Rule 42 - Petition for Review From the Regional Trial courts to the
Court of Appeals
I
^\^. - T4
a) Petition for Review, Scope, cases not covered, parties, where to file, when
to file, manner of filing, requisites, contents of petition; effect of failure to
comply with requirements (Sections 1 to 7)'
(Sections 7
d) Appellant,s Brief, Appellee's Brief, Appellant's Reply Brief
to 14)
of Appeals (Section
d) Questions that may be raised on appeal with the court
15)
Rule47-AnnulmentofJudgments,FinalordersorResolutions
grounds for filing' parties'
a) coverage, nature, where to file, when to file,
oiiuOgment, suspension of
requisites, contents,'""tion by the'court, effect
pidt"iiptire period, ielief available' (Sections 1 to 9)'
of Municipal Trial Courts (Section
b) Annulment of Judgments or Final Orders
10)
Rule 48 - Preliminary Conference
Rule 51 - Judgment
Court