Instrument Validation Matrix

Name of expert: Leah Mae Enero

Affiliation: DepEd Teacher, Teacher III - SHS STEM

Title: Struggles Encountered by Senior High School Students in Practical Research

Group Members: Gerald Landicho, Lady Lyn Lor, Jayceery Borres

Direction: At the scale of 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest , rate the validity of
the instrument to be used in the study.
I. FORMAT AND DESIGN
1. The format of the instrument is simple.
2. The instrument is easy to read.
3. The font style and the size are appropriate.
4. The lay-out is proportional.
5. The instrument conveys logical sequence.
II. CONTENT
1. It contains all the necessary components to be assessed.
2. It relates to measure attributes.
3. It is aligned with the objectives of the study.
4. It gives emphasis to the spiraling of the curriculum contents.
5. It is reliable.
III. CLARITY
1. It is expressed in a language that is understandable.
2. It provides the research with a clear set of criteria.
3. It is expressed in the simplest way.
4. The directions are clear.
5. The directions easy to follow.
IV. USEFULNESS
1. It is a valuable assessment tool.
2. It is free from bias.
3. It is easy to administer.
4. It is relevant to the needs of the time.
5. It is appropriate for the study.

Other comments and/or suggestions for improvement:

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

________________________
Signature of Expert
 Instrument Validation Matrix

Name of expert: Dr. Maria Carmen Caseros

Affiliation: Research Coordinator

Title: Struggles Encountered by Senior High School Students in Practical Research

Group Members: Gerald Landicho, Lady Lyn Lor, Jayceery Borres

Direction: At the scale of 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest, rate the validity of
the instrument to be used in the study.
I. FORMAT AND DESIGN
1. The format of the instrument is simple.
2. The instrument is easy to read.
3. The font style and the size are appropriate.
4. The lay-out is proportional.
5. The instrument conveys logical sequence.
II. CONTENT
1. It contains all the necessary components to be assessed.
2. It relates to measure attributes.
3. It is aligned with the objectives of the study.
4. It gives emphasis to the spiraling of the curriculum contents.
5. It is reliable.
III. CLARITY
1. It is expressed in a language that is understandable.
2. It provides the research with a clear set of criteria.
3. It is expressed in the simplest way.
4. The directions are clear.
5. The directions easy to follow.
IV. USEFULNESS
1. It is a valuable assessment tool.
2. It is free from bias.
3. It is easy to administer.
4. It is relevant to the needs of the time.
5. It is appropriate for the study.

Other comments and/or suggestions for improvement:

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

________________________
Signature of Expert
 Instrument Validation Matrix

Name of expert: Jethro Calaycay

Affiliation: Research Teacher

Title: Struggles Encountered by Senior High School Students in Practical Research

Group Members: Gerald Landicho, Lady Lyn Lor, Jayceery Borres

Direction: At the scale of 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest, rate the validity of
the instrument to be used in the study.
I. FORMAT AND DESIGN
1. The format of the instrument is simple.
2. The instrument is easy to read.
3. The font style and the size are appropriate.
4. The lay-out is proportional.
5. The instrument conveys logical sequence.
II. CONTENT
1. It contains all the necessary components to be assessed.
2. It relates to measure attributes.
3. It is aligned with the objectives of the study.
4. It gives emphasis to the spiraling of the curriculum contents.
5. It is reliable.
III. CLARITY
1. It is expressed in a language that is understandable.
2. It provides the research with a clear set of criteria.
3. It is expressed in the simplest way.
4. The directions are clear.
5. The directions easy to follow.
IV. USEFULNESS
1. It is a valuable assessment tool.
2. It is free from bias.
3. It is easy to administer.
4. It is relevant to the needs of the time.
5. It is appropriate for the study.

Other comments and/or suggestions for improvement:

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

________________________
Signature of Expert