You are on page 1of 6

International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS-2017)

II. PV SYSTEM DESCRIPTION


Maximum Power Extraction in PV System
using Fuzzy Logic and Dual MPPT Control
Dr. R. Sankar1, Mr.S.Velladurai2, Mr. R. Rajarajan3, Mrs. J.Anitha Thulasi4,
Dean 1, Associate Professor2, Assistant Professor3,4
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
SKR Engineering College123, DMI College of Engineering4, Chennai
Dean.eee@skrenggcollege.org1, velladuraiskreee@gmail.com2 , rajarajanvec@gmail.com3, anithathulasi.jana@gmail.com4

Abstract__ In this paper proposes a new digital control are known to be much cleaner and produce energy
scheme for a photovoltaic (PV) system using fuzzy-logic without the harmful effects of pollution unlike their
and a dual (MPPT) controller. To obtain the maximum conventional counterparts. A photovoltaic cell or
electricity from the solar cells, the PV modules have two photoelectric cell is a semiconductor device that
MPPT controllers. The dc voltage and current are
controlled to track the maximum power point, where
converts light to electrical energy by photovoltaic
the PV modules feed the maximum output power. A effect. If the energy of photon of light is greater than
MPPT technique is used to operate in the optimum the band gap then the electron is emitted and the flow
power condition .The first MPPT controller is an of electrons creates current. However a photovoltaic
astronomical two-axis sun tracker, which is designed to cell is different from a photodiode. In a photodiode
track the sun over both the azimuth and elevation light falls on n channel of the semiconductor junction
angles and obtain maximum solar radiation at all times. and gets converted into current or voltage signal but a
The second MPPT controller controls the power photovoltaic cell is always forward biased.
converter between the PV panel and the load and also it Usually a number of PV modules are arranged in
implements a new fuzzy-logic controller (FLC) based
perturb and observe (P&O) scheme to keep the system
series and parallel to meet the energy requirements.
power operating point at its maximum. The proposed PV modules of different sizes are commercially
control scheme achieves stable operation in the entire available (generally sized from 60W to 170W). For
region of the PV panel and eliminates the resulting example, a typical small scale desalination plant
oscillations around the maximum power operating requires a few thousand watts of power.
point. The tracking mechanisms can be classified into
three types, namely, passive method, optical method,
Keywords—Digital signal processor, fuzzy logic and the astronomical method. The general features
controller (FLC), maximum power point tracking that characterize an efficient tracking mechanism are:
(MPPT), physical tracking, standalone photovoltaic ability to cover a wide range of space, robustness
(PV) system. against wind disturbances, and low-power
consumption.
I. INTRODUCTION Passive tracking is based on the heating properties
of gas matters such as Freon. The tracker is
Renewable energy is the energy which comes from composed of two cylindrical tubes fitted on the edges
natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides of the panel; these tubes are filled with a fluid under
and geothermal heat. These resources are renewable partial pressure. Sun heat will increase the sun side.
and can be naturally replenished. Therefore, for all This type of system is relatively cheap and needs
practical purposes, these resources can be considered little maintenance. However, it has lower efficiency
to be inexhaustible, unlike dwindling conventional compared to other types of trackers, especially at low
fossil fuels. The global energy crunch has provided a temperatures, moreover they have not yet been
renewed impetus to the growth and development of widely accepted by consumers.
Clean and Renewable Energy sources. Clean The second method of tracking is the optical or
Development Mechanisms (CDMs) are being electro-optic trackers. This method uses feedback
adopted by organizations all across the globe. Apart sensors such as photo-sensors, current, voltage
from the rapidly decreasing reserves of fossil fuels in sensors, and auxiliary cells to determine the panel
the world, another major factor working against fossil reference position .A closed-loop position control
fuels is the pollution associated with their system based on fuzzy logic or PID is used to
combustion. Contrastingly, renewable energy sources produce the actuators control commands. The

978-1-5386-1887-5/17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEE


3764
International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS-2017)

drawback for such a system is that it is very sensitive II. PV SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
to atmospheric conditions (clouds shading) and might The proposed standalone photovoltaic system
not be able to continue tracking the sun in a cloudy consists of four main blocks: PV panel, solar tracker,
day. DC/DC converter (charger), and the MPPT
The third tracking method is the astronomical controller. The following sections will describe the
method, which employs the longitude and latitude modeling of each component.
data of a given location to determine the sun current A.PV Panel Model
position. The main advantage of this method over the
optical method is that it involves simpler The PV panel model used in our analysis is the
programming, reduced implementation cost, and single-diode model. This model represents the
lower power consumption as the need for additional illuminated solar cell in its simplest form as a PN
sensors is eliminated. This method also provides high junction, as shown in Fig. 1
degree of accuracy and is not sensitive to
atmospheric conditions. Vcell=vD-IcellRs (1)
Icell= Iph-ID=Iph-Io(eKpv(Vpv+IpvRs)-1 (2)

Iph is the photocurrent given

Iph=(Isc+Ki(T-Tr))

Fig. 1. PV system circuit model.

The literature is rich with various MPPT


techniques varying in implementation complexity,
cost, adjustability to different PV systems, and
overall produced efficiency.
This paper proposes a new DSP controlled dual-
MPPT scheme based on fuzzy logic control (FLC).
Fig. 2. PV panel characteristics.
The first MPPT controller is an astronomical two-
axis sun tracker that keeps maximum radiation on the
panel throughout the day. The second controller
implements a new fuzzy-based MPPT technique to
adaptively change the P&O perturbation step size
depending on the PV system operating point and the
current step size. The proposed control scheme
achieves stable operation in the entire region of the
PV panel and eliminates therefore the resulting
oscillations around the maximum power operating
point. The small signal analysis model of the power
converter is presented along with a Lyapunov-based
stability analysis of the PV system.

Fig. 3. Block diagram of the control system

3765
International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS-2017)

Fig 4. The proposed DSP-based standalone solar energy system.

B. Solar Tracker to provide the angular position and speed information


to the DSP to implement the control algorithm.
In order to track the sun trajectory, a two-axis
tracker with a 150-Watt PV panel was manufactured, C.Power Converter Model
as illustrated in Fig. 4. The tracker base has a rotary
table mechanism with a DC motor and a worm gear The developed standalone PV system uses a buck
drive that rotates the panel about the vertical axis. converter as a power processing unit. The buck
The rotary table includes in addition a thrust bearing converter circuit consists of a MOSFET switch and a
that is able to support the load caused by the weight diode, in addition to a filter circuit based on a
of the structure. The panel is held using a frame, capacitor and an inductor as shown in Fig. 5. The
which is mounted on top of the rotary table. circuit is controlled through a PWM signal generated
The panel is tilted around the horizontal axis using by the MPPT controller.
another DC motor connected to the panel through a
gear with a ratio 240:1. The tracker is controlled
using an astronomical angular trajectory generation.
Given the date, time, latitude, and longitude of the
current location of the system, the DSP controller
calculates the sun reference azimuth and elevation
angles using pre implemented equations. The panel
azimuth and elevation angles are next controlled to
follow their reference values using digital closed loop
position control, as shown in Fig. Incremental optical Fig 5 buck boost circuit diagram
encoders are connected to the motor shafts

3766
International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS-2017)

III. DUAL-MPPT SYSTEM


C. Fuzzy Logic Controller
The proposed DSP-based standalone photovoltaic
system consists of two main subsystems; an Fuzzy logic is one of the most powerful control
astronomical two-axis tracker combined with an methods. It is known by multi-rules-based resolution
MPPT-based buck converter and multivariable consideration. Fuzzy MPPT is
popular for over last decade. Fuzzy logic controllers
A.FLC-Based MPPT (FLC) have the advantages of working with
imprecise inputs, no need to have accurate
The proposed MPPT controller builds upon the mathematical model, and it can handle the
simplicity of the P&O technique but eliminates the nonlinearity. The FLC consists of two inputs and
resulting steady state oscillations by adaptively ooutput. The two FLC input variables are the error
modifying the reference voltage perturbation step- (E) and change of error (CE) that expressed by
size C using a fuzzy logic controller. The PV panel equation
power is computed from the panel voltage and
current and then the absolute value of the power E(j)=Ppv(j)-Ppv(j-1)/Vpv(j-1) (3)
slope Sa=dPPv/dVPV is computed and fed to the FLC
along with the old step value Cold. CE(j)=E(j)-E(j-1) (4)

B. P&O Algorithm The fuzzification is the process of converting the


system actual inputs values E and CE into linguistic
The principle of P&O is to perturbation by acting fuzzy sets using fuzzy membership function. These
decrease or increase on the PWM duty cycle of boost variables are expressed in terms of five linguistic
converter and then observing the direction of change variables (such as ZE (zero), PB (positive big), PS
of PV output power, If at any instant j the output PV (positive small), NB (negative big), NS (negative
power P (j) & voltage V (j) is greater than the small)) using basic fuzzy subsets.
previous computed power P (j−1) & V (j-1), then the
direction of perturbation is maintained otherwise it is Fuzzy rule base is a collection of if-then rules that
reversed [10, 11]. The flow chart of algorithm has 4 contain all the information for the controlled
cases as shown parameters. It is set according to professional

When ΔP <0 & V(j)>V(j-1), this yields to D (j+1) = Table I FLC rules base
D (j) – SD
When ΔP <0 & V(j)<V(j-1), this yields to D (j+1) =
D (j) + SD
When ΔP >0 & V(j)<V(j-1), this yields to D (j+1) =
D (j) - SD
When ΔP >0 & V(j)<V(j-1), this yields to D (j+1) =
D (j) + SD

Where SD is chosen value by trial and error in


simulation. A simulation of the P&O algorithm has
been implemented by using MATLAB.

Defuzzification of the inference engine, which


evaluates the rules based on a set of control actions
for a given fuzzy inputs set. This operation converts
the inferred fuzzy control action into a numerical D. PID Controller
value at the output by forming the union of the
outputs resulting from each rule. The centre of Area A proportional–integral–derivative controller (PID
(COA) algorithm is used for defuzzification of output controller) is a generic control loop feedback
duty control parameter. i.e. If E is NB and CE is ZO mechanism (controller) widely used in industrial
then crisp D is PB, it means that if the operating point control systems – a PID is the most commonly used
is far away from the MPP by the right side, and the feedback controller. A PID controller calculates an
variation of the slope of the curve is almost Zero; "error" value as the difference between a measured
then increase the duty cycle process variable and a desired set point.

3767
International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS-2017)

The controller attempts to minimize the error by


adjusting the process control inputs.

Kp, Ki, Kd are the tuning knobs, are adjusted to


obtain the desired output. The following speed
control example is used to demonstrate the effect of
increase/decrease the gain, Kp, Ki, Kd
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The experiment is completed with MATLAB
simulation. The experimental waveform of duty
cycle, PV power and output power were shown
below. PV power is 54 V and by using MPPT got the
power as 68V

Fig 8 Output curves for duty cycle

V. CONCLUSION

This paper presents a new digital control scheme


for a standalone photovoltaic system using fuzzy-
logic and a dual-MPPT controller. The MPPT
controller is combined with a dual-axis panel tracking
controller to improve the efficiency of the overall
system. The proposed control scheme takes the
power slope of the PV panel curve and the old
voltage perturbation step as its inputs and outputs the
change in the new P&O step size. The FLC output is
gradually updated in order to avoid exceeding the
MPP in the opposite direction leading to oscillations.
The PID controller and FLC was implemented on a
DSP software code composer studio. The proposed
Fig 6 Output voltage of PV (V) technique is able to reduce the steady state
oscillations and enhance the operating point
convergence speed.

VI. FUTURE WORK


To make the system more advanced, by
adding one more control loop Which results in an
increase in the efficiency, as the system demonstrates
a faster dynamic performance and better regulated
PV output voltage compared to P&O The use of
modified adaptive techniques and the introduction of
three-point weight comparison P&O algorithm are
suggested.

VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to start by thanking the Almighty
and our Parents, who filled us with wisdom and
knowledge and rendered us good health and made us
to finish the project successfully. We express our
sincere thanks to our Principal, HOD and
Fig 7 Output power of PV Management.

3768
International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS-2017)

REFERENCES Renewable Energies and Vehicular


Technology 978-1-4673-1170-0/12/$31.00
[1] Michihiko Nagao, Member, IEEE Koosuke ©2012 IEEE
Harada, Fellow “Power Flow of
Photovoltaic using Buck Boost PWM Power
Inverter”, IEEE Energy Electronics
Laboratory, Kumamoto Institute of
Technology

[2] Johan H. R. Enslin, Senior Member, IEEE,


Mario S. Wolf, Dani¨el B. Snyman, and
Wernher Swiegers “Integrated Photovoltaic
Maximum Power Point Tracking Converter
IEEE Transactions On Industrial
Electronics, Vol. 44, No. 6, December 1997

[3] “Design and Implementation of


Microcontroller Based Fuzzy Logic Control
for Maximum Power Point Tracking of a
Photovoltaic System” 6th International
Conference on Electrical and Computer
Engineering ICECE 2010, 18-20 December
2010, Dhaka, Bangladesh

[4] Eftichios Koutroulis, Kostas Kalaitzakis,


Member, IEEE, and Nicholas C. Voulgaris
“Development of a Microcontroller-Based,
Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point
Tracking Control System” IEEE
Transactions On Power Electronics, Vol. 16,
No. 1, January 2001

[5] Eladio Duran Aranda, Juan Antonio Gomez


Galan, Mariano Sidrach De Cardona, And
Jos_E Manuel Andu Jar Marquez
”Measuring The I-V Curve Of Pv
Generators” IEEE Industrial Electronics
Magazine September 2009

[6] Fangrui Liu, Yong Kang, Yu Zhang and


Shanxu Duan “Comparison of P&O and Hill
Climbing MPPT Methods for Grid-
Connected PV Converter” Project Supported
by Delta Science & Technology Educational
Development Program

[7] Kashif Ishaque, Zainal Salam, Member,


IEEE, Muhammad Amjad, and Saad
Mekhilef, Member, IEEE “An Improved
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)–Based
MPPT for PV With Reduced Steady-State
Oscillation” IEEE Transactions On Power
Electronics, Vol. 27, No. 8, August 2012

[8] Mohamed Amine Fakhfakh, Moez Ayadi


and Rafik Neji “Implementation of
photovoltaic system into microcontroller”
2012 First International Conference on

3769

You might also like