You are on page 1of 6

This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been

fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.2967310, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION 1

Design and Analysis of Wideband Low-Scattering Endfire


Antenna Using Moth Tail-Inspired Metamaterial Absorber and
Surface Waveguide
You-Feng Cheng, Xiao Ding, Lin Peng, Ju Feng, and Cheng Liao

Abstract—This paper presents a wideband endfire antenna co-designed often required when these methods are employed, especially for planar
with broadband low-scattering characteristics. The wideband reflection and array designs. The incident waves can also pass through the planar
endfire radiation attribute the success to the supported dual-resonance
surface waves, and the broadband low scattering owes to the combination of
antenna directly and thus the RCS is suppressed. To this end, the
a metamaterial absorber (MA) absorption and an incident penetration of a frequency selective surface (FSS)-based design was introduced as
frequency selective surface (FSS). Based on the transmission line model, a another efficient method [14-16]. By replacing the ground plane with
surface waveguide (SWG) which can support dual-resonance surface waves a suitable FSS structure, the out-of-band RCS can be reduced and in-
is adopted and analyzed to realize the wideband reflection response (4.95 band radiation characteristics are retained. Nevertheless, in terms of
~ 6.83 GHz) and endfire radiation. Also, the SWG can be seen as an FSS for
the normal incidence. In addition, a wideband MA, which is inspired by the
this solution, there is a conflict between the in-band RCS reduction
luna moth's escape from bat attack, is designed and integrated with the and the in-band antenna radiation. Recently, in order to further
SWG to realize low back radar cross section (RCS) in the frequency range improve the RCS-reduction bandwidth, novel designs which combine
from 0.5 to 12.5 GHz. The reflection, radiation and scattering performance some of the above solutions are presented [17-20]. Besides, bionic
are validated by the full-wave simulation and experimental verification. methods are introduced into low-RCS designs recently. [21] designed
Index Terms—Frequency selective surface (FSS), moth tail-inspired an ultrawideband (UWB) antenna which is inspired by the insect
metamaterial absorber (MA), radar cross section (RCS), surface wave tentacle. The designed antenna can both retain good radiation
performance and exhibit UWB RCS reduction. However, the RCS
I. INTRODUCTION reduction should be further enhanced in the antenna operation band.
Planar printed antennas/arrays have been widely used in military and Planar endfire antennas have shown outstanding performance in
civil applications due to their low-profile, high-gain and easy-to-be- some long-distance wireless applications. Since they are widely used
integrated characteristics. Except of their radiation performance, low- in a phased array, it is meaningful to focus on the RCS reduction of
RCS planar antennas and arrays also have drawn many researchers’ planar endfire antennas. Unfortunately, there are only few published
attention. Generally, the scattering of an antenna mainly comes from reports which investigated this topic. In [22], a low-RCS bilateral
two parts, viz., the antenna-mode and structural-mode scattering [1-3]. Vivaldi antenna using the half-mode substrate integrated waveguide
The former one can be reduced with a good impedance match, while (SIW) was proposed. The in-band monostatic RCS of the antenna can
the latter one must be suppressed by additional special solutions. In be reduced to as much as 24 dB without degradation of radiation
summary, there are three solutions are suggested to realize designs of performance. However, the RCS-reduction bandwidth of this design
the low-RCS antennas in literature. The first one is to convert the needs to be broadened. Therefore, the realization of a planar endfire
income energy into heats, such as radar absorbing material-loading, antenna with broadband RCS reduction is a strong challenge in the
lumped and distributed loading, and metamaterial absorber (MA)- area of microstrip antennas. [23] presented an ultrathin microwave-
loading techniques [4-9]. The drawback of this method is that it may absorbing material-loaded Vivaldi antenna with UWB and low-RCS
lead to a decrease in the antenna radiation properties, such as low properties. The measured results show the antenna is able to operate
antenna gains and high sidelobe levels. field in the observation from 0.8 to 15.5 GHz and has the reduced RCS from 2 to 18 GHz.
direction to other directions. The most commonly used methods are Nevertheless, the RCS-reduction frequency band cannot cover the
the active and passive cancellation technologies [10-13]. A antenna operation band. Besides, the RCS reduction of this design still
checkerboard surface composed of two improved Jerusalem cross should be further enhanced.
cells, which have a 180° (±30°) reflection phase difference over a In this paper, based on a stacked hybrid structure that is composed of
frequency band from 9.1 to 25.8 GHz, was proposed in [13]. By a surface waveguide (SWG) and a MA, a wideband low-scattering
arranging the proposed surface around a planar antenna, it can obtain planar endfire antenna is presented. On one hand, the SWG can
an X-, Ku- and K-band low-RCS design with the antenna reflection support trapped surface waves and thus the endfire radiation is
and radiation almost unchanged. However, enlarged apertures are realized. On the other hand, for the normally incident waves, the SWG
exhibits as an FSS with low-pass and band-pass characteristics. By
Manuscript received XX XX, 2019. This work was supported in part by the integrating the transmission of the SWG and absorption of the MA,
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 61731005, 61771407, the in-band and out-band back scattering of the antenna can be reduced
61801405 and 61901398), in part by the Key Laboratory of Cognitive Radio
and Information Processing, Ministry of Education (Guilin University of
simultaneously. Finally, the proposed antenna is simulated, fabricated
Electronic Technology, Grant CRKL190202) and in part by the Fundamental and measured, and the measured results of the fabricated prototype
Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant A0920502051904-64). validate that a low-scattering feature in the frequency range from 0.5
Y. F. Cheng, J. Feng and C Liao are with the Institute of Electromagnetics, to 12.5 GHz can be realized.
Southwest Jiaotong University (SWJTU), Chengdu 610031, China (e-mail:
juvencheng@swjtu.edu.cn, fengju-fj@.swjtu.edu.cn, c.liao@swjtu.edu.cn).
X. Ding, is with the Institute of applied physics, University of Electronic II. A NTENNA D ESIGN AND A NALYSIS
Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu 610054, China (e-mail:
xding@uestc.edu.cn). A. Antenna Geometry
L. Peng is with the Key Laboratory of Wireless Wideband Communication
and Signal Processing, Guilin University of Electronic Technology (GUET),
The antenna geometry composed of three parts (the SWG, exciting
Guilin, 541004, China (penglin@guet.edu.cn) strips and moth tail-inspired MA) is illustrated in Fig. 1. In the SWG,

0018-926X (c) 2019 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.2967310, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION 2

Layer 3 patch Vias


PEC H H
H
E E E

H3
k k k
Substrate 3
z y z y
z z y z y
H0

Layer 1 Layer 2 x x
x Air x x

H2
Substrate 2 βx
H1

Substrate 1
L0
Layer 0 Shorting and feeding pin PEC PMC PEC PMC PEC PMC PEC
Periodic Boundray
(a) (a) (b) (c) (d)
Fig. 2. Simulation models of the SWG/FSS, MA and stacked unit cells. (a)
L0
When the SWG works as a waveguide. (b) When the SWG works as an FSS.
(c) MA with a metal ground. (d) MA-FSS stacked structure.

Y0 8
Dc Dp

Frequency (GHz)
6
W0

Lp

Ygu Ys
y 4
x TM Mode
Yd
Ysub Ysub 2 TE Mode
βz ɛr Light line
0
(b) Ygl 0 20 40 60 80
L0
Phase shift (degree)
(a) (b)
Fig. 3. Equivalent circuit model for analyzing the propagation constant and the
calculated propagation constant. (a) Equivalent circuit model. (b) Calculated
Wd Dst
Feeding probe propagation constant

Substrates 1, 2 and 3 have the relative permittivity of 2.94, 2.2 and


W0

Ds
Lp
Lst

Ld

4.4 and the thickness of H1, H2 and H3, respectively. The optimized
Shorting via parameters are: L0 = 90mm, Ld = 17.5mm, Lst = 20.5mm, Lp = 3.2mm,
Wst Lt = 9.5mm, Ls = 0.5mm, W0 = 54mm, Wd = Wst = 4.5mm, Wt = Ws=
y
x 0.5mm, Dc = 6mm, Dp = 4.5mm, Ds = 1.2mm, Dt = 18mm, Dst = 12mm,
H0 = 7.5mm, H1 = 3mm, H2 = 0.508mm, H3 = 1mm, and R0 = 150Ω.
(c)
B. Reflection and Radiation Performance
L0
On one hand, the lower part of the proposed antenna can be seen as
an SWG, dual-resonance surface waves can be supported. The excited
Ws
Ds

Resistor(R0) surface waves radiate at the right edge of the SWG, and thus dual
resonances and the endfire radiation are generated. The surface-wave
Dt analysis can be given as the following three steps.
W0

Ls The launcher (exciting strip) is horizontally aligned and then


Ws

Ds

Ls dovetail with the SWG to excite only TE-mode surface waves. The
y transmission line model is utilized to analyze the SWG. Fig. 2(a)
x presents the simulation model of the SWG unit cell, and Fig. 3(a) plots
the equivalent circuit model for analyzing the propagation constant (βx)
(d)
of the TE surface wave along the SWG. The surface admittance (Ys)
Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna. (a) Side view. (b) SWG (Layer 1).
(c) Printed exciting strips (Layer 2). (d) Moth tail-inspired MA (Layer 3). of the SWG is a parallel connection of the upper grid admittance (Ygu)
of the upper patch array and the surface admittance (Yd) which is a
15 × 9 square patches (each patch has a length of Lp) are periodically serial connection of the surface admittance (Ysub) of the substrate and
printed on each side of Substrate 1 with a inter distance of Lc as shown the lower rid admittance (Ygl) of the lower patch array. Therefore, it
in Fig. 1 (b). Substrate 2 is placed upon the SWG. Four strips shown can be obtained that [24]
in Fig. 1 (c) are printed on Substrate 2 to excite surface waves in the Ys = Ygu + Yd, Yd = 1/(2/Ysub + 1/Ygl) (1)
SWG. The rightmost strip is fed by a coaxial probe and a shorting pin Besides, the surface admittance for TE surface wave propagation
and the others are parasitic ones. Note that the left two strips with a along the SWG can be written as [25]
length of Lst is a little longer than that (Ld) of the right two, and they
all have a width of Wd. An MA composed of dual moth tail shaped Ys = j√(βx)2 -(k0 )2 /(ωμ0 ) (2)
patches is loaded upon the exciting strips. There is an air gap with a
where ω is the angular frequency, k0 and μ0 are the wave number and
thickness of H0 between the MA and strips. As shown in Fig. 1(d),
permeability in free space, respectively. It is found from (2) that a
each dual-moth tail-shaped patch mounted on Substrate 3 consists of
larger surface capacitance leads to a larger propagation constant of the
a slots-etched square patch and four tail strips, and four resistors with
TE surface wave.
a resistance of R0 are inserted in each patch.

0018-926X (c) 2019 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.2967310, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION 3

Transmission band Absorption band

Reflction of the FSS

Tansmission of the FSS

Reflction of the MA

f1 f2 f3
Fig. 4. Ideal transmission and reflection of each part of the proposed antenna.
0
S-parameters (dB)

-15 (a)

-30 S of the FSS S of the FSS


11 21

-45 S of the metal ground-backed MA


11
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Frequency (GHz)
(a)
0
S-parameters (dB)

(b)
-15
Fig. 6. Fabricated prototype of the proposed antenna. (a) Array components
before assembly. (b) Assembled structure.
S of the stacked structure
11
-30
the MA, it is expected that broadband low-scattering performance of
S of the stacked structure
21 the proposed antenna can be realized. The ideal transmission and
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 reflection coefficients are represented in Fig. 4. Within the frequency
Frequency (GHz) range from 0 to f1 and f2 to f3, the stacked structure is transparent for
(b) the incident EM waves. Besides, the FSS behaves as a ground plane
Fig. 5. Simulated results of the unit cells shown in Fig. 3. (a) FSS and metal of the MA from f1 to f2, and thus the stacked structure absorbs
ground-backed MA. (b) Stacked FSS-backed MA. impinging waves as a wideband high-impedance surface absorber.
Therefore, low back scattering of the proposed antenna from 0 to f3
Thereafter the propagation constant of the SWG is calculated and
can be integrated.
depicted in Fig. 4. According to [26] which firstly develops the
Firstly, the simulation model of the SWG unit cell is depicted in Fig.
transmission line model for analyzing the TE surface wave resonances
2(b) and its S-parameters under normal incidence of TE and TM
of the guiding structure, the total length of the SWG equals to an
polarizations are shown in Fig. 5(a). It can be seen that its reflection
integer multiple of a resonant length for the TE waves that travel along
coefficients are all higher than -5 dB with the frequency band of 3.9 ~
the surface. Thus, the frequency of the surface-wave resonance of the
9.4 GHz, while the transmission coefficients are greater than -1 dB
antenna is determined by
from 0 to 2.8 GHz and from 10.3 to 13.1 GHz.
βxnDc = 2mπ (3)
Then, a wideband MA inspired by the luna moth's escape from bat
where m is a natural number, and n is the number of SWG unit cells
attack is designed and simulated as shown in Fig. 2(c) [27]. The
along surface-wave propagation direction. For the proposed antenna
proposed MA backed by a metal ground with a distance of H0 is able
with n = 15, he resonant frequencies are calculated to be 5.1 and 7.1
to imitate the long spatulate tails of luna moths and transform incident
GHz. Thus, the dual-resonance reflection performance is realized.
wave energy into heats of the embedded resistances. Fig. 5(a) plots the
In terms of the endfire radiation, the array factor of the radiation of
reflection coefficients of the MA. There is little reflection in the
the surface waves excited by the active and its leftmost parasitic strips
frequency band from 3.5 to 11.3 GHz, and its coefficient (S11) is less
can be calculated as
than -10 dB.
F ( ) = 1+ | I 2 / I1 | e j ( +Dst cos  ) (4)
At last, the metal ground of the MA shown in Fig. 2(c) is replaced
where I 1 and I2 are the excited surface-wave currents and δ is the phase by the adopted FSS. The simulation model of the stacked FSS-backed
lag between the two currents. The inter-strip distance (Dst) is about 1/8 MA is illustrated in Fig. 2(d). Based on the simulated results of the
guide wavelength (means δ is about 90°) and quarter free-space FSS and ground-backed MA, it is predicted that the income energy
wavelength. This indicates that the proposed antenna can achieve can directly pass through the stacked structure in the frequency range
endfire radiation, which is similar to the operation principle of Yagi of 0 ~ 2.8 GHz and 11.3 ~ 13.1 GHz, and from 3.9 to 9.4 GHz, the
antennas. Besides, additional two longer parasitic strips are printed FSS can be seen as the ground of the MA, and thus the income energy
with the same distance to improve the radiation performance. can be absorbed. Besides, in the other frequency band, the hybrid
stacked structure is able to partly absorb the EM energy and get part
C. Scattering Performance of them penetrate through. Simulated results of the stacked structure
On the other hand, the SWG can also work as an FSS structure. By are shown in Fig. 5(b). It can be found that its transmission coefficient
combining the transmission function of the FSS and the absorption of is higher than -1 dB from 0 to 1 GHz and from 11.6 to 12.9 GHz. In

0018-926X (c) 2019 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.2967310, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION 4

0 0 with MA(CO) 0

Reflection coefficients (dB)


with MA(XP)
315 0dBi 45 315 0dBi 45
-5 xoy plane
-10dBi -10dBi
-10
-20dBi -20dBi
-15 270 -30dBi xoz plane 90 270 -30dBi 90

-20 Sim.-Proposed Mea.-Proposed


Sim.-Reference Mea.-Reference
-25
4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 225 135 225 135
Frequency (GHz) without MA(CO)
180 without MA(XP) 180
Fig. 7. Simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the antenna.
(a)
0 with MA(CO) 0
0 Sim.(CO) 0
0dBi 0dBi with MA(XP)
Sim.(XP) 315 0dBi 45 315 0dBi 45
315 45 Mea.(CO) 315 45 xoy plane
-10dBi Mea.(XP) -10dBi -10dBi -10dBi
xoy plane
-20dBi -20dBi -20dBi -20dBi

270 -30dBi xoz plane 90 270 -30dBi 90


270 -30dBi xoz plane 90 270 -30dBi 90

225 135 225 135


225 135 225 135 without MA(CO)
180 without MA(XP) 180
180 180
(b)
(a) Fig. 9. Radiation patterns of the antennas with and without the MA. (a) @5.2
0 Sim.(CO) 0 GHz. (b) @6.3 GHz.
0dBi 0dBi
Sim.(XP)
315 45 Mea.(CO) 315 xoy plane 45 10
-10dBi Mea.(XP) -10dBi Fig. 8. Simulated and measured reflection coefficients
Simulated Measured
of the antenna.
Realized gain (dBi)
-20dBi -20dBi

270 -30dBi xoz plane 90 270 -30dBi 90 5

225 Sim.(CO) Sim.(XP) 135


225 135
Mea.(CO) Mea.(XP) 0
180
4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
180
Frequency (GHz)
(b)
Fig. 8. Normalized antenna radiation patterns. (a) @5.2 GHz. (b) @6.3 GHz. Fig. 10. Simulated and measured frequency response of the realized gain.
addition, its reflection coefficient reveals that the absorption band is Secondly, the radiation performance of the antenna is studied.
5.9 ~ 12.9 GHz. Back scattering in other frequency bands can also be During the measurement, the proposed antenna is utilized as the
reduced by partly absorbed and partly penetrating through the stacked transmitter and a wideband horn antenna is adopted as the receiver.
structure. According to the above surface waves-based analysis, it can be
expected that the endfire radiation with other good performance would
III. V ALIDATION OF A NTENNA P ERFORMANCE be realized.
In order to validate the antenna performance, a prototype shown in Fig. 8 shows the simulated and measured radiation patterns at 5.2
Fig. 6 is fabricated and measured. The active strip is fed by a coaxial and 6.3 GHz. The measured results agree well with the simulated ones.
cable and a shorting via. An AV3618 Vector Network Analyzer It can be observed that the proposed antenna is able to produce a main
is used to measure the reflection feature of the proposed antenna, beam in the endfire (positive x) direction, as predicted in the above.
while the radiation and scattering performance are measured in an Besides, the proposed antenna possesses low cross-polarized radiation
anechoic chamber. (lower than -15 dB) and low back radiation.
Fig. 9 illustrates the radiation patterns of the antennas with and
A. Reflection Performance without the MA. Since the antenna generates the endfire radiation and
the MA is loaded upon the antenna, it is can be indicated that the
Firstly, the reflection properties are investigated, as shown in Fig. 7.
loaded MA has little impacts on the antenna radiation performance.
From the measured results, it can be seen that the proposed antenna
This conclusion is validated in Fig. 9 from which the radiation patterns
has dual resonances at about 5.2 and 6.3 GHz which are close to the
of the MA-loaded antenna are almost the same with those of the
surface-wave resonant frequencies analyzed and calculated in
antenna without the loaded MA in the main-lobe area.
Section II-B. The measured bandwidth for S11 ≤ -10 dB is about 1.83
The measured and simulated realized gains in the operation band is
GHz (31.1% relative to the center frequency), extending from 4.95 to
illustrated in Fig. 10. It can be observed that the proposed antenna
6.83 GHz. It can be concluded that the dual-resonance operation
exhibits stable gain from 5.06 to 6.25 dBi in the endfire direction
principle can broaden the impedance bandwidth of the proposed
within its bandwidth. Since an FR4 substrate with its loss tangent of
endfire antenna.
0.025 is used for the MA design, it is hard to get a high realized gain.
B. Radiation Performance
C. Scattering Performance

0018-926X (c) 2019 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.2967310, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION 5

TABLE I
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PROPOSED ANTENNA AND SOME OTHER LOW-RCS DESIGNS

Reflection RCS-reduction In-band/out-band Impacts on Antenna


References RCS-reduction techniques
bandwidth bandwidth RCS reduction radiation size
0.6-dB enlarged
[7] MA absorption 3.5% 4.7% in-band
decrease
[8] MA absorption 6.9% 80% both 6.5-dB increase unchanged
0.6-dB enlarged
[9] MA absorption 21.1% 97.7% both
decrease
[12] Reflection cancelation 6.4% 36.7% both 2-dB increase enlarged
0.3-dB unchanged
[14] Incident penetration ~2% ~53.5% out-band
decrease
[17] MA absorption 10% 54.5% both 7-dB increase unchanged
MA absorption + Incident 0.5-dB unchanged
This work 31.1% 184.6% both
penetration decrease

20 20 Fig. 11 plots the simulated and measured results of the antenna RCS
Simulated RCS of the proposed antenna
Monostatic RCS (dBsm)

10 reduction. Note that only the measured results from 4 to 12 GHz are

RCS reduction (dB)


Simulated RCS of the reference antenna
0 10
Simulated RCS reduction shown due to the limitation of experimental conditions. It can be
-10 Measured RCS reduction indicated that the antenna has a significant monostatic RCS reduction
0
-20 from 0.5 to 12.5 GHz for both TE and TM polarizations. Measured
-30 -10 results validate the wideband low-scattering performance of the
-40 proposed bandwidth-enhanced endfire antenna.
-50 -20 In order to illustrate more special advantages of this work, the
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 proposed wideband low-scattering endfire antenna is compared with
Frequency (GHz)
various recently reported low-RCS designs. As listed in Table I, the
(a) design in [7], whose reflection and RCS-reduction bandwidths are
20 20 both narrow due to the antenna and MA structures, firstly uses the MA
Simulated RCS of the proposed antenna
Monostatic RCS (dBsm)

10 absorption to suppress the antenna RCS. This loaded MA can only


RCS reduction (dB)

Simulated RCS of the reference antenna


0 Simulated RCS reduction 10 reduce the in-band RCS and has a 0.6-dB decrease in the antenna
-10 Measured RCS reduction radiation gain. Compared with the design in [7], the antenna presented
% (3)

0
-20 in [8] has a significant improvement of the RCS-reduction bandwidth.
-30 -10
Besides, the designed antenna contains a partially reflecting surface
-40 (PRS), which can be used to improve the antenna gain and adopted as
-50 -20 the ground of the MA. Note that, the MA has no impacts on the
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 antenna gain. [9] proposed an antenna with an even wider RCS-
Frequency (GHz) reduction bandwidth. Besides, the antenna reflection bandwidth is also
(b) greatly wider than those in [7] and [8]. However, there is a 0.6-dB
Fig. 11. Simulated and measured monostatic RCS and RCS reduction of the decrease in the realized gain in comparison with their reference
proposed antenna. (a) TE Polarization. (b) TM polarization. antennas. Similarly, the design in [17] can realize a wideband RCS
reduction due to the MA absorption and a gain enhancement due to
Finally, the scattering performance of the proposed antenna is the PRS. The main contribution of this work is that the reflection
investigated. In the simulation, since the RCS of the antenna reduced bandwidth is further broadened by the frequency-reconfiguration
at 0 Hz is of non-sense, the starting frequency is chosen as 0.5 GHz. technique. The antenna in [12] uses a checkerboard-shaped artificial
In the measurement setup, two wideband horn antennas with their magnetic conductor (AMC) structure to obtain the reflection
bandwidth of 4 ~ 12 GHz are adopted as transmitter and receiver, cancelation and thus the RCS reduction. In addition, the AMC
respectively. The antenna under test on a rotation equipment is structure can also enhance the antenna gain. Nevertheless, both the
illuminated by the incident waves from the transmitter and scatters reflection and RCS-reduction bandwidths should be further broadened.
electromagnetic waves to the receiver. Besides, in order to validate the Besides, the antenna aperture is greatly enlarged due to the loaded
low-scattering performance of the proposed antenna, a reference AMC structure. In [14], an FSS-based design with an out-band RCS
printed dipole antenna with the same size and a complete metal ground reduction is designed. This design has the narrowest reflection
and without the MA is used for comparison. Reflection coefficients of bandwidth. The proposed antenna in this paper adopts both the MA
the reference antenna is also shown in Fig. 7. absorption and incident penetration to realize the low-RCS design. As
According to [28] and [29], the antenna RCS can be calculated as a result, this work has the widest reflection and RCS-reduction
 dBsm = S 21 − S 21
0
+  dBsm
0
(5) bandwidths. Besides, the MA has only about 0.5-dB decrease on the
where σ0dBsm denotes the theoretical value of the RCS of a standard radiation gain and the FSS has a benefit in the endfire radiation
reference ball, S21 and S021 are the transmission coefficients between because it can also work as an SWG radiation because it can also work
the two horn antennas when an antenna under test and the standard as an SWG.
reference ball are tested, respectively. Based on the above equation,
the RCS reduction of the proposed and reference antennas can be IV. CONCLUSION
expressed as the difference between the transmission coefficients This paper presents a wideband low-scattering endfire antenna. On
when the antenna under test and the reference antenna are measured one hand, the operation principles of the wide impedance bandwidth
 Re = S 21AUT − S 21RA (6) and wideband endfire radiation is analyzed by using surface-wave and

0018-926X (c) 2019 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2020.2967310, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION 6

transmission line model theories. The propagation constant of the TE [19] Y. Zhuang, G. Wang, Q. Zhang, and C. Zhou, “Low-scattering tri-band
metasurface using combination of diffusion, absorption and cancellation,”
surface waves is investigated and then the surface-wave resonance of
IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 17306–17312, 2018.
the proposed antenna is calculated. Calculated results agree well with [20] A. Y. Modi, C. A. Balanis, C. R. Birtcher, and H. N. Shaman, “New class
the simulated and measured ones. On the other hand, broadband low of RCS-reduction metasurfaces based on scattering cancellation using
back scattering is obtained by adopting an FSS-moth tail-inspired MA array theory,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 298–
308, Jan. 2019.
stacked structure. A fabricated prototype of the proposed antenna is
[21] W. Jiang, Y. Liu, S. X. Gong, and T. Hong, “Application of bionics in
measured, and the measured results validate the reflection, radiation antenna radar cross section reduction,” IEEE Antennas Wireless. Propag.
and scattering performance. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 1275–1278, 2009.
[22] Y. Jia, Y. Liu, Y. Hao, and S. Gong, “Vivaldi antenna with reduced RCS
REFERENCES using half-mode substrate integrated waveguide,” Electron. Lett., vol. 50,
no. 5, pp. 345–346, Feb. 2014.
[1] L. Feng, S. H. Deng, and Y. Z. Ruan, “Reduction of mode scattering [23] Zhang, P. and J. Li, “Compact UWB and low-RCS Vivaldi antenna using
component and RCS of reflector antennas,” ACTA Electronica Sinica, ultrathin microwave absorbing materials,” IEEE Antennas Wireless.
Vol.23, No.12, 93-94, 1995. Propag. Lett., Vol. 16, pp. 1965–1968, 2017.
[2] Y. Liu, D. M. Fu, and S. X. Gong, “A novel model for snalyzing the radar [24] O. Luukkonen, C. Simovski, G. Granet, G. Goussetis, D. Lioubtchenko,
cross section of microstrip antenna,” J. of Electromagn. Waves and Appl., A. V. Raisanen, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Simple and accurate analytical
Vol.17, No.9, 1301-1310, 2003. model of planar grids and high-impedance surfaces comprising metal
[3] Y. Liu and L. You, “Research on the estimation and reduction measures strips or patches,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 56, no. 6, pp.
of antenna mode RCS of airborne phased array,” Proceedings of IEEE 1624–1632, Jun. 2008.
4th International Symposium on Microwave, Antenna Propagation and [25] D. F. Sievenpiper, “High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces,” Ph.D.
EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications (MAPE), Beijing, dissertation, Dept. Elect. Eng., Univ. California at Los Angeles, Los
China, pp. 79-82, 2011. Angeles, CA, US, 1999.
[4] D. M. Pozar, “Radiation and scattering from a microstrip patch on a [26] F. Costa et al., “TE surface wave resonances on high-impedance surface
uniaxial substrate,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. AP-35, no. 6, pp. based antennas: analysis and modeling,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
613–621, Jun. 1987. vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3588–3596, Oct. 2011.
[5] D. M. Pozar, “RCS reduction for a microstrip antenna using a normally [27] J. R. Barber, B. C. Leavell, A. L. Keener, et. al., “Moth tails divert bat
biased ferrite substrate,” IEEE Microw. Guided Wave Lett., vol. 2, no.5, attack: Evolution of acoustic deflection,” Proceedings of the National
pp. 196–198, May 1992. Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 9, pp.2812-2816, 2015.
[6] J. L. Volakis, A. Alexanian, and J. M. Lin, “Broadband RCS reduction [28] J. J. H. Wang, C. Choi, R. L. Moore, “Precision experimental
of rectangular patch by using distributed loading,” Electron. Lett., vol.28, characterization of the scattering and radiation properties of antennas,”
no. 25, pp. 2322–2323, Dec. 1992. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 108-112, Jan. 1982.
[7] T. Liu, X. Y. Cao, J. Gao, Q. R. Zheng, W. Q. Li and H. H. Yang, “RCS [29] S. Shrestha, M. D. Balachandran, M. Agarwal, L. R. Zou, K.
reduction of waveguide slot antenna with metamaterial absorber,” IEEE Varahramyan, “A method to measure radar cross section parameters of
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, NO. 3, pp. 1479–1484, Mar. 2013. antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vo1. 56, no. ll, pp. 3494-
[8] W. B. Pan, C. Huang, P. Chen, X. L. Ma, C. G. Hu, and X.G. Luo, “A 3500, Nov. 2008.
low-RCS and high-gain partially reflecting surface antenna,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 945–949, Feb. 2014.
[9] C. Huang, W. B. Pan, X. L. Ma, and X. G. Luo, “Wideband radar cross-
section reduction of a stacked patch array antenna using metasurface,”
IEEE Antennas Wireless. Propag. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 1369-1372, 2015.
[10] M. Paquay, J. C. Iriarte, I. Ederra, R. Gonzalo, and P. de Maagt, “Thin
AMC structure for radar cross-section reduction,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3630–3638, Dec. 2007.
[11] Y. J. Zheng, J, Gao, X. Y. Cao, Z. D. Yuan and H. H. Yang, “Wideband
RCS reduction of a microstrip antenna using artificial magnetic
conductor structures,” IEEE Antennas Wireless. Propag. Lett., vol. 14,
pp. 1582–1585, 2015.
[12] Y. Zhao, X. Cao, J. Gao, X. Yao, and X. Liu, “A low-RCS and high gain
slot antenna using broadband metasurface,” IEEE Antennas Wireless
Propag. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 290–293, 2016.
[13] Y. F. Cheng, X. Ding, and W. Shao, “A novel checkerboard AMCsurface
for X-, Ku-and K-band RCS reduction,” 2017 IEEE International
Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio
Science Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2017, pp. 1927–1928.
[14] S. Genovesi, F. Costa, and A. Monorchio, “Low profile array with
reduced radar cross section by using frequency selective surfaces,” IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 2327–2335, 2012.
[15] F. Costa, S. Genovesi, and A. Monorchio, “A frequency selective
absorbing ground plane for low-RCS microstrip antenna arrays,” Progr.
Electromagn. Res., vol. 126, pp. 317–332, 2012.
[16] J. P. Turpin, P. E. Sieber, and D. H. Werner, “Absorbing ground planes
for reducing planar antenna radar cross-section based on frequency
selective surfaces,” IEEE Antennas Wireless. Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp.
1456–1459, 2013.
[17] C. Huang, W. Pan, X. Ma, and X. Luo, “A frequency reconfigurable
directive antenna with wideband low-RCS property,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1173–1178, Jan. 2016.
[18] C. Huang, C. Ji, X. Wu, J. Song, and X. Luo, “Combining FSS and EBG
surfaces for high-efficiency transmission and low-scattering properties,”
IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 66, pp. 1628-1632, 2018.

0018-926X (c) 2019 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

You might also like