Moot Court Team - I

PETITIONER RESPONDENT

Vivekanandan K L Rahul B
Ullas K Jayasree P K
Mary C A Sumesh S

CASE : Maggi v Union Of India

Petitioner Role
Vivekanandan Whether the petitioner has the locus standi to file the writ petition
(Need to explain the complete case and its position and relative rights,
sections rules etc)
Ullas Whether there is any violation of Fundamental right guaranteed under the
Article 21
(Need to explain the complete case and its position and relative rights,
sections rules etc)
Mary CA Whether compensation is payable as part of remedy in a writ petition under
article 32 and whether the respondents in the case are liable to pay
compensation
(Need to explain the complete case and its position and relative rights,
sections rules etc and Final Prayer)

Respondent Role
Rahul Petitioner don’t have the locus standi to file the writ petition
(Need to explain the complete case and its position and relative rights,
sections rules etc)
Jayasree There is no violation of Fundamental right guaranteed under the Article 21
(Need to explain the complete case and its position and relative rights,
sections rules etc)
Sumesh No compensation is payable as part of remedy in a writ petition under
article 32 and respondents in the case are not liable to pay compensation
(Need to explain the complete case and its position and relative rights,
sections rules etc and Final Prayer)