Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing healthcare, but little is known about consumer
receptivity to AI in medicine. Consumers are reluctant to utilize healthcare provided by AI in real
and hypothetical choices, separate and joint evaluations. Consumers are less likely to utilize
healthcare (study 1), exhibit lower reservation prices for healthcare (study 2), are less sensitive to
differences in provider performance (studies 3A–3C), and derive negative utility if a provider is
automated rather than human (study 4). Uniqueness neglect, a concern that AI providers are less
able than human providers to account for consumers’ unique characteristics and circumstances,
drives consumer resistance to medical AI. Indeed, resistance to medical AI is stronger for
consumers who perceive themselves to be more unique (study 5). Uniqueness neglect mediates
resistance to medical AI (study 6), and is eliminated when AI provides care (a) that is framed as
personalized (study 7), (b) to consumers other than the self (study 8), or (c) that only supports,
rather than replaces, a decision made by a human healthcare provider (study 9). These findings
make contributions to the psychology of automation and medical decision making, and suggest
interventions to increase consumer acceptance of AI in medicine.
Abstract
The essence of a brand is that it delivers on its promises. However, consumers’ trust in brands
(CTB) has declined around the world in recent decades. As a result, CTB has become a major
concern for managers. The authors examine whether CTB is influenced by marketing-mix
activities (i.e., advertising, new product introduction, distribution, price, and price promotion)
implemented by brands. The authors propose and show that the sensitivity of CTB to marketing-
mix activities is moderated by consumer, category, and country characteristics, using a multisource
data set consisting of a survey of 15,073 respondents and scanner panel data on 589 brands in 46
CPG categories across 13 countries (including the four largest emerging markets), which
collectively account for half of the world’s population. The authors find strong positive effects for
advertising and new product introduction intensity, weak positive effects for price and distribution
intensity, and a minor negative effect for price promotion intensity on CTB. Furthermore, the
authors find that the effect of marketing-mix activities on CTB is moderated by consumers’
personality traits, consumers’ reliance on brands in a category, and countries’ secular-rational and
self-expression cultural values.
Abstract
Consumers routinely make decisions about the timing of their consumption, making tradeoffs
between consuming now or later. Most of the literature examining impatience considers monetary
outcomes (i.e., delaying dollars), implicitly assuming that how the money is spent does not
systematically alter impatience levels and patterns. The authors propose an impatience asymmetry
for material and experiential purchases based on utility duration. Five studies provide evidence
that consumers are more impatient toward experiential purchases compared to material purchases
and that this increased impatience is driven by whether the value is extracted over a shorter utility
duration (often associated with experiential purchases) or a longer utility duration (often associated
with material purchases). Thus, when an experience is consumed over a longer period of time, the
results show that impatience can be diminished. Additional results show that the effect holds in
both delay and expedite frames and suggest that the results cannot be explained by differences in
scheduling, time sensitivity, affect, ownership, future time perspective, or future connectedness.
Abstract
Consumers’ response to mass media can be difficult to assess because individuals choose for
themselves the amount of media they consume, and that choice may be correlated with their other
consumption decisions. To avoid this selection problem, this article examines the introduction of
television to the US, during which some cities gained access to television years before others. This
natural experiment makes it possible to estimate the causal impact of television on the decision to
start smoking, a consumer behavior with important public health implications. Difference-in-
differences analyses of television’s introduction indicate that (1) television did cause people to
start smoking, (2) 16- to 21-year-olds were particularly affected by television, and (3) much of the
response to television occurred within a couple of years of its introduction. Our preferred estimates
suggest that television increased the share of smokers in the population by 5–15 percentage points,
generating roughly 11 million additional smokers between 1946 and 1970. More broadly, these
results offer causal evidence that (1) mass media can have a large influence on consumers,
potentially affecting their health, (2) media exerts an especially strong influence on teens, and (3)
mass media can influence consumers more than typical changes in prices.
5) Extending the Boundaries of Sensory Marketing and Examining the Sixth Sensory
System: Effects of Vestibular Sensations for Sitting versus Standing Postures on
Food Taste Perception
Abstract
Prior research has examined the role of the traditional five sensory systems (visual, olfactory,
haptic, auditory, and gustatory) and how they influence food evaluations. This research extends
the boundaries of sensory marketing by examining the effects of the vestibular system, often
referred to as the “sixth sensory system,” which is responsible for balance and posture. The results
of six experiments show that vestibular sensations related to posture (i.e., sitting vs. standing)
influence food taste perceptions. Specifically, standing (vs. sitting) postures induce greater
physical stress on the body, which in turn decreases sensory sensitivity. As a result, when eating
in a standing (vs. sitting) posture, consumers rate the taste of pleasant-tasting foods and beverages
as less favorable, the temperature as less intense, and they consume smaller amounts. The effects
of posture on taste perception are reversed for unpleasant-tasting foods. These findings have
conceptual implications for broadening the frontiers of sensory marketing and for the effects of
sensory systems on food taste perceptions. Given the increasing trend toward eating while
standing, the findings also have practical implications for restaurant, retail, and other food-service
environment designs.
9) Ignored or Rejected: Retail Exclusion Effects on Construal Levels and Consumer Responses to
Compensation
Abstract
Among the top customer complaints regarding retailers are experiences of exclusionary treatment
in the form of explicit condescension or implicit disregard. However, little is known about how
consumers respond to different instances of exclusion in retail or service settings. This research
focuses on how customers respond cognitively and emotionally when frontline staff reject or
ignore them and on how retailers can recover from such service failures. Findings from six studies
using exclusion as a hypothetical scenario or a real experience demonstrate that direct negative
feedback leads customers to feel rejected and to form concrete low-level mental construals, while
a lack of attention leads customers to feel ignored and to form abstract high-level construals.
Explicit rejection (implicit ignoring) causes consumers to form more (less) vivid mental imagery
of the exclusionary experience and to activate a concrete (abstract) mindset, resulting in
preferences for tangible (intangible) and visual (textual) compensation options. Retailers are
advised to align their compensation with construal levels to increase post-recovery customer
satisfaction, customer reviews, intended loyalty, and brand referral behavior.
10) Filling an Empty Self: The Impact of Social Exclusion on Consumer Preference
for Visual Density
Abstract
This research examines the effect of social exclusion on consumers’ preferences for visual density.
Based on seven experimental studies, we reveal that consumers who perceive themselves as
socially excluded evaluate products with dense visual patterns more positively than their
nonexcluded peers. This effect occurs because social exclusion triggers a feeling of psychological
emptiness and dense patterns can provide a sense of being “filled,” which helps to alleviate this
feeling of emptiness. This effect is attenuated when consumers physically fill something or
experience a feeling of “temporal density” (i.e., imagining a busy schedule with many tasks packed
into a short time). These results shed light on consumers’ socially grounded product aesthetic
preferences and offer practical implications for marketers, designers, and policy makers.