Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Visit it again and read it. I will briefly give you and introduction anyway but you'll need to search for more
and built your own spreadsheets for some of these calculations.
Endpoint scaling is an option that allows the user to use the same normalized relative perm curve to a set
of different regions in the reservoir (or blocks in a simulation model) while still honoring variations in rock
properties such as connate water saturation (which is strongly and inversely correlated to absolute rock
perm), maximum values of relative perms to flowing phases (i.e. end-point relative perms), trapped
phase saturations (such as residual oil saturation). I will give you an example that will make this clearer
for you. In first place you should know that, for instance, absolute rock perm usually correlates very well
with connate (irreducible) water saturation for clastic reservoirs. See for example the book by Amyx et al
"Petroleum Reservoir Engineering", page 151. This is true in absence of capillary pressure effects. Now,
let's imagine that you have two clastic rocks composed of exactly the same minerals and filled with oil
and water of the same compositions; in addition, wettability is the same for both rocks. However, the
only thing that makes them different is permeability (even porosity is the same; since porosity is
unaffected by grain size you might have two rocks of the same porosity but different absolute perm).
Then you take rock samples (plugs) from both rocks and measure, by any method, the water/oil relative
perm curve. Would you get the same water/oil kr curve? The answer is NO, because if perms are
different then the connate (irreducible) water saturation must be different. Read SPE 2588 on the
“Influence of pore geometry on water-oil relative permeability” for a more comprehensive discussion on
this.
Now move on to another aspect. Let’s suppose you are asked to build a geologic model for a reservoir
you work with. Think of a simple case in which you only have one geologic layer of interest. However,
across this one layer there are still spatial variations of rock permeability, which is the common thing in
real life. Thus you have hundreds or even thousands of grid blocks in this one layer, each grid block with
a different absolute rock perm value. Since absolute rock perms are different in each block then the
connate (irreducible water saturations) are different then you would need hundreds or thousands of
relative permeability curves to honor each single rock perm in each block. Would you? Is it practical to
input hundreds or thousands of relperms in your model? Of course not, that’s why we use End-Point
Scaling.
PS: attached you'll find a excerpt from an Eclipse manual with some details on the topic.
Best regards,