Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GUIDE TO
THIRD EDITION
GUIDE TO
Clinical
Documentation
THIRD EDITION
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. This product is protected by copyright. No part of it may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,
without written permission from the publisher.
As new scientific information becomes available through basic and clinical research, recommended treatments and drug therapies undergo
changes. The author(s) and publisher have done everything possible to make this book accurate, up to date, and in accord with accepted
standards at the time of publication. The author(s), editors, and publisher are not responsible for errors or omissions or for consequences
from application of the book, and make no warranty, expressed or implied, in regard to the contents of the book. Any practice described in
this book should be applied by the reader in accordance with professional standards of care used in regard to the unique circumstances that
may apply in each situation. The reader is advised always to check product information (package inserts) for changes and new information
regarding dose and contraindications before administering any drug. Caution is especially urged when using new or infrequently ordered
drugs.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by F. A. Davis
Company for users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that the fee of $.25
per copy is paid directly to CCC, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. For those organizations that have been granted a photocopy
license by CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged. The fee code for users of the Transactional Reporting Service is:
978-0-8036-6662-7/18 0 + $.25.
When I think back to 2004, when the first edition of this book
was published, I think of a wonderful group of friends who
were there to celebrate with me. As I anticipate the publication
of the third edition, almost all of those same wonderful friends
are still here, encouraging and supporting me, and cheering me
on to the finish line. Sadly, my dear friend Candy left us much
too soon, and I miss her sweet presence more than words can
say. The essence of her heart and soul is with me always. For
the remaining STUB-C friends (Kent, Donna, Paige, Jeff,
John, Brianna, Justin, Tim, Carla, and Jeff ), thanks for your
friendship, your love, and your constancy in my life through
the past two decades. I couldn’t ask for a better group of people
to share life with! I hope there are many more decades to come!
Not only have I been blessed with these incredible friends, but
I am fortunate to have the most loving, caring, and supportive
husband any woman could hope for. Greg is an unwavering
source of encouragement and inspires and challenges me to be
the best I can be. He has stood beside me without complaint
through the days of writer’s block, looming deadlines,
malfunctioning computers, and the often-self-imposed frenzy
of my world. He has the insight to know when to cheer me on,
when to make me take a break, and when to give me space. I
am so grateful for his calming influence, his ability to make
me laugh and not take myself too seriously, and all he does
to keep things running smoothly in the Sullivan household.
Thanks, Greg, for all this, and so much more. And I promise...
no fourth edition!
Gilbert Boissonneault, PhD, PA-C, DFAAPA Sara Haddow Liebel, MSA, PA-C
Professor Education Director/Associate Professor
Division of Physician Assistant Studies Physician Assistant Department, College
Medical University of South Carolina of Allied Health Sciences
Charleston, SC Augusta University
Augusta, GA
Elizabeth Brownlee, MPAS, PA-C
Physician Assistant, Assistant Professor Nicole Schmitz, DNP, APRN, PNP, CHSE
School of Physician Assistant Studies, College Assistant Professor
of Medicine Nursing
University of Florida Minnesota State University – Mankato
Gainesville, FL Mankato, MN
Rhonda Glen Feldman, MHS, MSS, PA-C Emily K. Sheff, CMSRN, FNP, BC
Program Director Assistant Professor
Physician Assistant School of Nursing
University of New England MGH Institute of Health Professions
Portland, ME Boston, MA
Pat Kenney-Moore, EdD, PA-C
Associate Director/Academic Coordinator/Associate
Professor
School of Medicine, Division of Physician
Assistant Education
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, OR
It is interesting to me how each edition of this book bring real-world knowledge and hands-on patient care
has its own uniqueness. I have worked at a different experience where I would only have been able to read
place during the writing of each edition, and I hope and write about what others do.
that has resulted in a deep layering of experience and There is a tremendous team of people at F. A. Davis
knowledge that makes each edition better. I certainly who have been part of this project. Even though he
feel like each job change has enhanced my professional retired before this edition was published, my dear friend
practice and has enriched me as a person. I have met Andy McPhee was the driving (cajoling? bullying?)
and worked with some extraordinary health-care force behind the third edition. I hope he is enjoying
providers, and I have had valuable contributions from his much-deserved retirement and getting to write
so many of them. what he wants, when he wants, if he wants. When
First, I would like to say thank you to my colleagues Andy approached me about a third edition, one of the
at Academic Urology and Urogynecology of Arizona. most anxiety-producing aspects of considering it was
I have had such encouragement and support from this who would be the developmental editor because I had
great group of people. I am grateful to have learned from less-than-wonderful experiences on the two previous
so many outstanding health-care providers throughout editions. I need not have worried at all, as I have had
my more than 27 years in medicine. I have benefitted the very good fortune to work with Stephanie Kelly,
from the expertise of Jamie Bair, NP (cardiology); developmental editor extraordinaire! Stephanie’s
Jennifer Nelson, PA-C (psychiatry); Steve Turner, knowledge of the process, her organizational skills,
RN (hospice); Dr. Richard Guthrie (palliative care); her sense of humor, and her hard work have made the
and several outstanding hospitalists who wished to journey so enjoyable, and she has my deepest gratitude.
remain nameless. I’m thankful for a group of dedicated I’m also grateful for the guidance of and contributions
Information Technology people who have helped me from Melissa Duffield, Senior Acquisitions Editor;
navigate electronic medical records and who’ve answered George Lang, Director of Content Development;
my questions with enthusiasm. Amelia Blevins, Developmental Editor for Digital
I must take this opportunity to acknowledge Products; Megan Suermann, Content Project Manager;
two incredible women who added so much to the Lori Bradshaw, Developmental Production Editor at
Document Library that we included in this edition S4Carlisle P ublishing; and Robert Butler, Production
of the book: Madison Palmer, MMS, PA-C, not only Manager. There’s probably not another publishing com-
contributed the prenatal records, but she also provided pany around that would have supported this project as
valuable assistance with content in the prenatal chapter. F. A. Davis has done, and I’m humbled and honored
Larissa J. Bech, MSN, RN, FNP-C contributed the they chose to champion this book.
pediatric records. Without their contributions, the
—Debbie Sullivan
prenatal and p ediatric visit notes would not exist. They
Appendices
Appendix A Document Library 309
Appendix B A Guide to Sexual History Taking 373
Appendix C I SMP’s List of Error-Prone Abbreviations, Symbols,
and Dose Designations 375
Bibliography 377
Index 387
Inscription 200
Subscription 200
Signa or sig 200
Indication 200
Refill Information 200
Generic Substitution 201
Warnings 201
Container Information 201
Signature 201
Writing Prescriptions for Controlled Medications 201
Common Errors in Prescription Writing 202
Electronic Prescribing 203
Federal Initiatives for Electronic Prescribing 204
Qualified Electronic Prescribing 204
Benefits of E-Prescribing 205
Barriers to E-Prescribing 206
Summary 206
Worksheets 207
Appendices
Appendix A Document Library 309
Appendix B A Guide to Sexual History Taking 373
Appendix C I SMP’s List of Error-Prone Abbreviations, Symbols,
and Dose Designations 375
Bibliography 377
Index 387
It’s no secret that medicine is constantly changing and chapters and to provide much more detail about the
evolving, but I guess I didn’t realize that there have been content. New content includes Chapter 4, Documenting
so many changes and evolutions in documentation until Prenatal Care and Perinatal Events, and Chapter 7,
I started working on the third edition. Since the second Older Adult Preventive Care Visits. Some chapters were
edition was published in 2011, there have been signif- relocated within the text to present a more chronological
icant changes in coding, billing, reimbursable services, sequence. Every chapter was revised; some revisions were
federal requirements for documentation, platforms for fairly minor, whereas others were extensive. Medicolegal
documentation, and so on. And, thanks to the feedback Alerts are included in each chapter to help highlight
from users of this text and thoughtful reviews by edu- important concepts. New to this edition are images of
cators and practitioners, the “wish list” of content for electronic medical record (EMR) entries, or screen shots.
this text has changed as well. So, here you have it, the There are multiple EMR systems available, so what is
third—and by far, the best—edition. One thing that presented may look different from what you’ve seen
has not changed is the basic principle of the book—this before, but I think it is helpful to see sample entries
is an instructional work on documentation and is not from different systems.
meant to be an instructional work on the practice of Sometimes Appendices don’t get a lot of attention,
medicine. Documentation and the practice of medicine but I hope you’ll check out Appendix A, the Document
are interrelated, and it is sometimes a challenge to keep Library. In the library, you’ll find documents that per-
them separate. However, they are two distinctly differ- tain to a particular patient grouped together in a way
ent practices. As an educator, I teach. As a Physician that captures the patient’s care chronologically. This
Assistant, I practice medicine. As an author, sometimes provides a different perspective than seeing them as
I want to do both, but that has never been the goal. “stand-alone” documents in multiple chapters.
The goal is to provide a solid foundation of principles Many educators mentioned that they would like the
of documentation that will preserve important aspects worksheet answers moved out of the book so that they
of the health-care provider–patient encounter while could be used more effectively as an educational tool,
meeting the requirements for reimbursement and other so this was done. You can find them in the Instructor’s
regulations. There are many examples of documenta- Guide, at DavisPlus on the F.A. Davis website, which
tion of various encounters throughout this book, and will allow you to provide them to the students as you
each is just one example of how an encounter may be see fit—you can simply provide the answers so students
documented. There is not just one way to document can check their own work, or you can use the worksheets
any encounter but many different ways; and different as graded assignments.
doesn’t mean “good” and “bad”—just different. I’m of Whether you are a student, a novice practitioner, or an
the opinion that the more examples you see, the more experienced provider, I hope this book will be a valuable
you will learn and the more prepared you will be when resource in your journey of professional development.
it comes time for you to document your way.
—Debbie Sullivan
Revisions started with the Table of Contents, which
Phoenix, Arizona
has been expanded to highlight sections within the
Chapter 1
Medicolegal Principles
of Documentation
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• Discuss medical and legal considerations of documentation.
• Identify groups of people who may access medical records.
• Identify general principles of documentation.
• Discuss medical coding and billing.
• Define the terms electronic medical records, meaningful use, and interoperability.
• Identify benefits of using electronic medical records.
• Identify challenges and barriers to using electronic medical records.
• Identify components of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
• Discuss principles of confidentiality.
patient does indeed have strep throat might be nice as record also serves other purposes and has audiences
well. If I prescribe a weak narcotic for a really nasty other than the patient and the health-care provider; it is
case of strep, the state medical board would be pleased both a medical and a legal document. The medical record
if I addressed what other medications have been tried establishes your credibility as a health-care provider. It
and whether the patient has any history of addiction. is important to remember that you are creating a record
I’ll also need to document that I explained the proper that other professionals will read; therefore, you should
use of the medications and the need for follow up if the use professional language and include appropriate
patient doesn’t get better. When I’m finally done with content. Other readers will assume, rightly or wrongly,
my note, it looks like this: that you practice medicine in much the same way that
you document. If your documentation is sloppy, full
CC: sore throat x 2d of errors, or incomplete, others will assume that is the
HPI: 17 y/o F with 2d h/o sore throat. Has an asso- way you practice. Conversely, thorough, legible, and
ciated headache and fever to 1018F. No significant complete documentation will infer that you provide
cough. Patient has noticed some swollen lumps in care in the same way, thus establishing your credibility.
neck. Having significant pain despite use of Tylenol, Some excellent providers simply do not have good doc-
ibuprofen and salt water gargles. umentation skills. However, this is the exception rather
Social Hx: no h/o substance abuse or addiction. than the rule. It is very difficult to persuade those who
ROS: denies neck stiffness or back pain, no rash. No read sloppy documentation that the person who wrote
difficulty speaking. that way can, and did, provide good care.
PE: VS: AF, VSS Up-to-date and complete documentation is an essential
Gen: alert, pleasant female in NAD component of quality patient care. The medical record
HEENT: NC/AT, PERRLA, EOMI, TM clear b/l, is the primary means of communication between mem-
OP notable for tonsillar enlargement with exudates. bers of the health-care team and facilitates continuity
No asymmetry or uvular deviation present. of care and communication among the professionals
Neck: + tender anterior cervical adenopathy, no nuchal involved in a patient’s care. Although many patients
rigidity or meningismus. will have a primary care provider who provides most of
CV: RRR S1/S2 without murmurs. their care, patients also may see specialists for specific
C/L: CTAB problems. Medical records are the vehicle for com-
Abd: soft, nondistended, nontender, no hepatosplenomegaly. munication among members of the health-care team,
McIsaac’s score = 4; Rapid strep + and the medical record is the common storehouse for
A: streptococcal pharyngitis all information about the patient’s care and condition
P: 1) Pen VK 500 mg po TID x 10 days. Discussed regardless of who is providing that care.
risks of medication including allergic reaction and
complications of not taking full course of antibiotics
including rheumatic fever and valvular heart disease.
2) hydrocodone elixir q HS to help relieve pain par- Legal Considerations
ticularly when trying to rest. Has already tried
acetaminophen and NSAID and will continue salt
of Documentation
water gargles. Follow up if no improvement in one As mentioned previously, all medical records are legal
week. Have discussed other potential diagnoses and documents and are important for both the health-
reviewed warning signs of retropharyngeal abscess care provider and the patient, regardless of where the
and meningitis. Patient agrees and understands plan. patient care takes place. The most important legal
functions of medical records are to provide evidence
Like I said, “pharyngitis >> penicillin.” that appropriate care was given and to document
(*Used with permission of the American Academy of the patient’s response to that care. An often-quoted
Family Physicians) principle of documentation, which every health-care
provider has probably heard, is that if it is not doc-
umented, it was not done. This is a fallacy because it
Medical Considerations is impossible to capture with documentation every
nuance of a patient–provider encounter, and it is im-
of Documentation possible to create a perfect record of every encounter.
However, the principle behind the quote is important
As illustrated in the example, the medical record serves in a legal context; there is a considerable time lapse
to document the details of the patient’s complaint and between when events occur (and are documented)
the medical evaluation and treatment. The medical and when litigation occurs. It may be anywhere from
2 to 7 years from the occurrence of an event until you Clear and concise documentation is required to receive
are called to give a sworn account of the event. The accurate and timely payment for furnished services.
medical record is usually the only detailed record of Peer-review organizations might read the record to
what actually occurred, and only what is written is determine whether the care reflected in your doc-
considered to have occurred. You will not remember umentation is consistent with the standard of care.
the details of an event that happened 6 years ago; your Researchers often obtain access to medical records for
only memory aid will be the medical record. As a legal purposes of conducting scientific studies. Although it
document, the medical record that you authored will be is important to remember that these audiences may
made available to plaintiff attorneys, defense attorneys, have access to your records, you should keep in mind
malpractice carriers, jurors, judges, and, most likely, that the primary audience of the medical records will
the patient. You should keep this in mind at all times be medical professionals involved in direct patient care.
when documenting. Throughout this book, you will analyze examples of
The record should be objective. Personal, subjective documentation. You may also complete the worksheets,
opinions regarding the patient, the patient’s family, or which will help you apply the information as you read
other providers do not belong in the medical record. It it. The purpose of this book is to teach documentation
is human nature to make value judgments about others, skills and critical analysis of medical records, not to
but it is asking for trouble to note in a record those instruct on the practice of medicine or to teach medical
irrelevant judgments about the patient. Document facts; decision-making. The content of a medical record—or
not opinions. All providers should strive for accuracy learning what to document—varies greatly, depending
in documentation. Correcting a medical record is not on the patient’s presenting problem or condition. The
only encouraged, but it is necessary in order to avoid principles of how to document and why documentation
potentially harmful mistakes or misrepresentations. is important do not vary as much and, thus, are the
Altering a record should never be done. Alteration con- focus throughout this book.
notes an improper change, concealment, or omission of
portions of records that were written inappropriately.
Correction implies the act of making something right. General Principles
Record alterations have rendered many defensible cases
indefensible. Most jurors will suspect that a provider of Documentation
who alters records has done so to cover up a mistake.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
The opposing attorney will argue that alteration shows
is one agency of the U.S. Department of Health and
consciousness of guilt. Alterations in medical records
Human Services (HHS). As one of the nation’s largest
may give rise to a claim for punitive damages against a
payers for health-care services, CMS has established
provider. Intentionally altering or destroying a patient’s
specific guidelines for documentation that are referenced
chart is considered unprofessional conduct. Most states
several times throughout this book. There are two sets of
will consider a practitioner who alters or destroys a
documentation guidelines currently in use: the 1995 and
patient’s chart to have violated the applicable licensing
the 1997 guidelines. CMS published an evaluation and
statute and will sanction or suspend the practitioner’s
management guide in 2015; however, it was offered as a
license to practice medicine.
reference tool and did not replace the content found in
the 1995 and 1997 guidelines. There are minor differences
Other Purposes between the two guidelines, and it is recommended
that health-care providers refer to the guidelines to
of Documentation identify those differences. Additional information may
be found at www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/
Reviewers from various organizations can obtain Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/
access to a medical record for a variety of purposes. Downloads/eval-mgmt-serv-guide-ICN006764.pdf.
Health-care payers require reasonable documentation Both sets of guidelines recognize the following
for a number of reasons: general principles of documentation:
• To ensure that a service is consistent with the pa- 1. The medical record should be complete and
tient’s insurance coverage legible.
• To validate the site of service, medical necessity, 2. The documentation of each patient encounter
and appropriateness of the diagnostic and/or should include the following:
therapeutic services provided • Reason for the encounter and relevant history,
• To confirm that services furnished were accurately physical examination findings, and diagnostic
reported test results
• Assessment, clinical impression, or diagnosis systems create a “digital footprint” every time a record
• Plan for care is accessed. This digital footprint includes the date and
• Date and legible identity of the health-care time and the identity (typically name and title and/or
provider role) of the person accessing the record. The system
3. If not documented, the rationale for ordering also will indicate the time and date of any updates or
diagnostic and other ancillary services should be changes made to the record. You should never document
easily inferred. in a patient’s record in advance of seeing the patient. In
4. Past and present diagnoses should be accessible addition, you can correct or amend a patient’s medical
to the treating and consulting providers. record, but you should never alter it. At times, it will
5. Appropriate health risk factors should be be necessary to make corrections to a record. When
identified. making a correction in a paper record, you should draw
6. The patient’s progress, response to and changes a single line through the text that is erroneous, initial
in treatment, and revision of diagnoses should be and date the entry, and label it as an error. If there is
documented. room, you may enter the correct text in the same area
7. The diagnosis and treatment codes reported on of the note. You should not write in the margins of a
the health insurance claim form or billing state- page; if there is no room to enter the correct text, use
ment should be supported by the documentation an addendum to record the information. You should
in the medical records. (More discussion of bill- never obliterate an original note, nor should you use
ing and coding is included later in this chapter.) correction fluid or tape. In the EMR, once a document
is submitted, it is still possible to modify or correct
There are other generally accepted principles of the record. If an entire entry is incorrect (for exam-
documentation, such as that each entry should include ple, charting on the wrong patient), there is a process
the date and time the record was created and should to identify the entry as an erroneous document. The
identify the person creating the record. In settings in process will vary with different EMR systems, and
which care is provided around the clock, military time institutions will have their own policy for identifying
is often used to avoid confusion between a.m. and p.m. erroneous entries.
One o’clock in the afternoon is 1300, 10:30 at night is Based on your reading, complete the application
2230, and so forth. Electronic medical record (EMR) exercise that follows.
If using a ruled sheet such as an order sheet or not read” or “dictated but not reviewed” because doing
progress note, be sure that there are no blank lines. so will call attention to the fact that you did not verify
If a record is dictated and then transcribed, read the the content of the record.
transcription before signing it, correcting any errors in When entering the medical field, you must learn the
the process. You should not stamp a record “signed but language in order to function. Part of learning this language
is to learn the meaning of the abbreviations, acronyms, with a hyphen. The third category of CPT codes cor-
and symbols in use; therefore, they are incorporated in responds to emerging medical technology. There are
this text. Abbreviations are a convenience, a time saver, approximately 7,800 CPT codes, and the codes are
a space saver, and a way of avoiding the possibility of updated annually.
misspelled words. Incorporating abbreviations is not
an endorsement of their legitimacy, but it is intended Evaluation and Management Services
to assist individuals in reading and understanding When a patient presents for care, you as the health-care
medically related documents. Sometimes abbreviations provider evaluate the patient and then proceed to manage
are not understood. They can be misread or interpreted the presenting complaint. That encounter between you
incorrectly. For example, the abbreviation “CP” could and the patient may vary from brief to comprehen-
mean “chest pain” or “cerebral palsy.” Of course, the rest sive depending on the patient’s chief complaint. For
of the entry should make clear the term for which the example, the time required for evaluation of a child
abbreviation is being used. There are variations in how who presents with a sore throat is typically brief, and
an abbreviation can be expressed. “Anterior-posterior” the management options are fairly straightforward.
has been written as AP, A.P., A/P. Abbreviations may Conversely, more time is required for evaluating an
appear as all uppercase or all lowercase, and they may older adult who has several chronic conditions and a
or may not have periods after each letter (for example, new complaint of chest pain, and the evaluation and
PRN, prn, P.R.N., meaning “as needed”). Many inherent management process is more complex.
problems associated with abbreviations contribute to CPT codes assigned for E/M services are deter-
or cause errors. Health-care organizations should for- mined by several factors. One factor is whether the
mulate a “Do Not Use” list of dangerous abbreviations, patient is new, established, or seen for consultation
and you as the health-care provider are responsible for services, and another is the setting where care is
complying with your institution’s policies regarding provided. Complexity of service is another factor
use of abbreviations. and is determined by three key elements: history
(including history of present illness [HPI]; review of
systems [ROS]; and past medical, family, and social
Medical Coding and Billing history [PMFSH], which are explored in Chapter 2),
physical examination, and medical decision-making.
Concise documentation of the medical encounter is The complexity considers the presenting complaint,
critical to providing patients with quality care and to co-existing medical problems, amount of data to be
ensuring accurate and timely reimbursement. Medi- reviewed (i.e., tests and old records), amount of time
cal records are subject to review by payers to validate that you spend with the patient, number of diagnoses
that the services provided were medically necessary and treatment options, and risk for significant com-
and were consistent with the individual’s insurance plications. Table 1-1 summarizes the requirements for
coverage. Standard codes are assigned to reflect the each level of E/M based on history, physical exam-
health-care diagnosis, procedures, and medical ser- ination, and complexity of medical decision-making.
vices provided and to create a uniform vocabulary In the case where counseling and/or coordination
for claims processing, medical care review, medical of care constitutes more than 50% of the encounter,
education, and research. Two important code sets are time is considered the key or controlling factor to
the Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) and the qualify for a particular level of E/M services. This
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. includes time spent with parties who have assumed
CPT codes are used to document many of the med- responsibility for the care of or decision-making for
ical procedures performed in a physician’s office. This the patient. If you elect to report the level of service
code set is published and maintained by the American based on counseling and/or coordination of care, then
Medical Association (AMA). CPT codes are five-digit you would document the total length of time of the
numeric codes that are divided into three categories. encounter, and you should describe in the record the
The first category is used most often, and it is divided counseling and/or activities performed to coordinate
into six ranges that correspond to six major medical care. Counseling includes discussion of diagnostic
fields: Evaluation and Management (E/M; discussed results, impressions, and/or recommended diagnostic
in more detail next), Anesthesia, Surgery, Radiology, studies; prognosis; risks and benefits of management
Pathology and Laboratory, and Medicine. The second options; instructions for management and/or follow-up;
category of CPT codes corresponds to performance importance of compliance with chosen management
measurement and, in some cases, laboratory or radiology (treatment) options; risk factor reduction; and patient
test results. Typically, these five-digit, alphanumeric and family education. An example of documentation
codes are added to the end of a Category I CPT code of time spent with a patient is shown in Example 1.1.
Table 1-1 Levels of Evaluation and Management Based on History, Physical Examination,
and Complexity of Medical Decision-Making
Level of History HPI ROS PMFSH
Problem focused Brief (one to three elements) None None
Expanded problem Brief (one to three elements) One system None
focused
Detailed Extended (four or more Two to nine systems One pertinent PMFSH (one
elements) from any of the three)
Comprehensive Extended (four or more 10 or more systems Complete PMFSH
elements)
Type of Physical
Examination Examination Description 1995 Guidelines 1997 Guidelines
Problem focused Limited to affected body area or One body area or organ One to five bulleted items
organ system system
Expanded problem Affected body area/organ system Two to seven body areas Six to 11 bulleted items
focused and other symptomatic or or organ systems
related organ system(s)
Detailed Affected body area/organ system Two to seven body areas 12 to 17 bulleted items for
and other symptomatic or or organ systems two or more systems
related organ system(s)
Comprehensive General multisystem Greater than eight body 18 or more for nine or
areas or organ systems more systems
Amount of Data Risk for Complications,
Medical Number of Treatment (Diagnostic Studies, Morbidity and/or
Decision-Making Options Prior Records) Mortality
Straightforward One or less One or less Minimal
Low Two Two Low
Moderate Three Three Moderate
High Four or more Four or more High
there is no medical term for “chest pain” when used as The primary code would be abdominal pain
a diagnosis, unless you know what is causing the chest (R10.10 if upper abdominal pain or R10.30 if
pain. When claims are submitted for payment, both CPT lower abdominal pain).
and ICD codes are provided, and your documentation 4. Secondary codes are listed after the primary code
must support the level of service billed. CPT codes work and expand on the primary code or define the
in tandem with ICD codes to create a full picture of need for a higher level of service.
the medical process for the payer; “this patient arrived • In the previous example, if the patient with
with these symptoms (as represented by ICD codes) abdominal pain has bloody vomitus, then
and these procedures were performed” (represented by hematemesis (K.92) would be coded as a
CPT codes). Downcoding is the process by which an secondary diagnosis.
insurance company reduces the value of a procedure or 5. Code a chronic condition as often as applicable
encounter and resulting reimbursement because either to the patient’s condition.
(1) there is a mismatch of CPT code and description, • Using example 3, the patient’s history of de-
or (2) the ICD code does not justify the procedure or pression may not be pertinent to the complaint
level of service. The quality and accuracy of the medical of abdominal pain, so it would not be coded;
record are vital to the reimbursement process, which, in however, diabetes would be coded.
turn, is vital to the delivery of health care. 6. Code co-existing conditions that may have an
influence on the outcome.
MEDICOLEGAL ALERT ! • In example 3, depression is a co-existing
condition that may alter a patient’s percep-
Although getting paid is a very important issue for tion of abdominal pain. The patient may take
health-care providers, you should never code for re- antidepressant medication, which could cause
imbursement purposes only. This can be construed as the pain. Coding both the chronic condition
fraud. Remember, your documentation must support the (diabetes) and co-existing condition (depres-
level of service and the diagnoses reported. sion) demonstrates the higher level of care
needed to manage the patient.
7. Do not use “rule out . . .” as a diagnosis.
Good documentation is absolutely essential to support • There is no code for this. Instead, use a
the level of E/M services and facilitate assignment of diagnosis, symptom, condition, or problem.
correct CPT and ICD codes. Here are some key con- You may use “rule out” when documenting the
cepts showing the interrelatedness of documentation assessment to guide you in your plan of care,
and codes and an illustrative example of each concept: although it is not necessary.
8. Signs and symptoms that are routinely associ-
1. Any tests ordered must correlate with an ICD
ated with a disease process should not be coded
code assigned to the visit.
separately.
• If a urine pregnancy test is performed, a rea-
• An upper respiratory infection (URI) is typ-
son for obtaining that test must be associated
ically associated with pharyngitis, rhinitis,
with a diagnosis, such as secondary amenor-
and cough. Pharyngitis, rhinitis, and cough
rhea (N91.1), menometrorrhagia (N92.0), or
each have a distinct ICD-10 code ( J02.9, J00,
abdominal pain (R10.10 if upper abdominal
and R05, respectively), but the code for URI
pain or R10.30 if lower abdominal pain).
( J06.9) is used because it encompasses these
2. Assign an ICD code that reflects the most
symptoms.
specific diagnosis that is known at the time. 9. When the same condition is described as both
• A patient’s diagnosis is gastroenteritis (K52.9). acute and chronic, code both and use the acute
If it is reasonably certain that it is viral, use the code first.
code for viral gastroenteritis, A08.4. Suppose • A patient may have an acute exacerbation
that the patient’s original complaint was di- ( J01.90) of chronic sinusitis ( J32.9).
arrhea (R19.7). The result of a stool culture is
positive for shigella. When the patient returns Accurate billing and coding is necessary to capture as
for a follow-up visit, then the diagnosis would much revenue as possible. The information presented
be enteritis, shigella (A03.9). here is meant to be illustrative in nature and is by no
3. The primary code should reflect the patient’s means adequate treatment of the subject and should not
chief complaint or the reason for the encounter. be relied on as authoritative. Many excellent resources
• A patient with a history of depression and are readily available to assist those who desire more
diabetes presents with acute abdominal pain. information on this topic.
Specific legislation and regulations exist that dictate such as patient records, cannot easily be shared across
the use of electronic prescribing. This is discussed in and sometimes within enterprises. There are signifi-
detail in Chapter 9. cant barriers to achieving interoperability. Incredibly,
there are over 1,000 EMR platforms on the market.
Barriers to Electronic Medical Records Most of these systems are highly proprietary and may
Many perceived barriers have hampered widespread not communicate well with each other. This lack of
implementation of EMRs. Although numerous studies interoperability presents a barrier to the transparent
have shown that most health-care providers believe that communication of health information, preventing
use of EMRs will improve quality of care, reduce errors, adequate coordination of care on the small scale and
improve quality of practice, and increase practice produc- obstructing population health management on a larger
tivity, there is resistance to adopting EMRs. A number scale. There is no standard technical language shared
of factors contribute to this, including well-publicized between systems; hence, there is little or no integra-
EMR failures; limited computer literacy on the part of tion with other applications, nor is there the ability
providers; concerns over security, productivity, patient of different systems to communicate in a meaningful
satisfaction, and unreliable technology; and the ab- way with one another. Information technologies were
sence of reputable research substantiating the benefits not initially designed with interoperability in mind, so
of EMR. Market and economic factors are a concern. rarely are structures in place to support it. Currently
Apart from the costs of hardware and software, there used data storage systems are often proprietary, and
is a tremendous cost in staff time and revenue when access to these systems is difficult. Implementation of
switching from paper to electronic charts. Ethical interoperable health information systems may require a
and legal issues abound with concerns about safety high degree of technical expertise not readily available
and security of systems and the ability to protect and to individual providers or smaller health-care organiza-
keep private confidential health information. There is tions. Standards of interoperability are only just being
even disagreement over who “owns” the data entered developed—after many health information technology
into any system as well as debate about accessibility to systems have already been installed and implemented.
the data. Technical matters, such as functionality, ease Meeting standards of operability will be an important
of use, and customer support from vendors are other criterion for the certification of EMR systems that are
barriers. It is challenging enough to find an EMR being developed at this time.
system that works for a single-provider ambulatory
care–based practice; it is another challenge altogether Meaningful Use
to find a system that will work for large institutions In February 2009, President Obama signed into law the
and serve the needs of diverse departments. Providers American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of
often complain that EMRs interfere with clinical 2009, which included more than $48 billion for health-care
care, making interactions more impersonal and less information technology for the adoption and effective use
face-to-face while also degrading clinical documentation. of EMR and for regional health information exchange.
Despite the huge investments that have been made in The Health Information Technology portion of ARRA
new technology, there are conflicting opinions about contains information related to the Health Information
the value of EMRs and whether or not they will truly Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act
help improve quality of care while decreasing costs. A (HITECH); the HITECH Act offers financial incen-
recent study by Medical Economics indicated that 67% tives for health-care providers and hospitals that comply
of physicians are displeased with their EMR systems. with the standards of “meaningful use.” To receive an
incentive payment, providers have to show that they are
Interoperability “meaningfully using” their certified EMR technology
Perhaps the biggest barrier to widespread adoption of by meeting certain measurement thresholds that range
EMR is lack of interoperability. A basic definition for from recording patient information as structured data to
interoperability is the ability of two or more systems or exchanging summary care records. The HITECH Act
their components to exchange information and to use imposes requirements for notification of a data breach
the information that has been exchanged. As it relates related to unauthorized uses and disclosures of “unsecured
specifically to EMRs, the Healthcare Information protected health information” (PHI). These notification
and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) defines requirements are similar to many data breach laws at
interoperability as “the ability of health information the state level related to personally identifiable financial
systems to work together within and across organizational information (e.g., banking and credit card data). Under
boundaries in order to advance the effective delivery of the HITECH Act, unsecured PHI essentially means
health care for individuals and communities.” Without “unencrypted PHI.” In general, the Act requires that
interoperability, fundamental data and information, patients be notified of any unsecured breach. If a breach
impacts 500 patients or more, then HHS also must be may be excluded for 18 months. If a person had health
notified. Notification will trigger posting the breaching insurance coverage before enrolling in a new health plan,
entity’s name on HHS’ website. Under certain conditions, the exclusion period may be reduced by the number
local media also will need to be notified. Furthermore, of months a person was insured, as long as there were
notification is triggered whether the unsecured breach no significant breaks of 63 or more days of coverage.
occurred externally or internally. Title I has additional important provisions. Pre-existing
conditions do not apply to pregnancy or to a child en-
rolled within 30 days of birth or adoption. Insurers are
Health Insurance Portability required to renew coverage to all groups regardless of
and Accountability Act the health status of any group member. Insurers may
not establish any rule that discriminates based on the
(HIPAA) health status of an individual or his or her dependent,
nor may they charge higher premiums or alter the level
Confidentiality of medical records has always been a of benefits. For those individuals with their own pri-
concern for health-care providers. Regardless of the vate health insurance plan, renewability is guaranteed.
medium of storage, confidentiality of data contained in Coverage cannot be terminated unless the premiums
the records will continue to be of utmost importance. are not paid, fraud is committed against an insurer, the
With the emphasis on interoperability and the criteria policy is terminated by the insured, the insured person
that define how EMR systems must be able to exchange moves outside the service area of a network plan, or the
confidential medical information securely, a discussion insurance is available only to members of that association
of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability and membership in the association is ended. If the insur-
Act (HIPAA, or the Act) is warranted. ance company stops selling the policy, it must offer the
Enacted by Congress in 1996 to address a number insured another policy it sells in the same state. Further
of issues affecting national health care, HIPAA is a details may be found at http://healthcare.findlaw.com/
large and complex law continually subject to revi- patient-rights/hipaa-the-health-insurance-portability-
sions and amendments by legislative actions. The Act and-accountability-act.html.
establishes standards, and timetables for adoption of
the standards, for electronic transfers of health data, Electronic Health-Care Transactions
addressing growing public concern about privacy and Prior to implementation of HIPAA, it was estimated
security of personal health data. The primary goals of that about 400 different formats were being used to
the standards are (1) to combat fraud and abuse; (2) to process health claims online. Billing and other adminis-
make health insurance more affordable and accessible; trative procedures were inconsistent and varied among
(3) to simplify administration of health insurance claims health insurers, the government, and other entities. This
by requiring all entities to bill electronically using one made it difficult for providers, hospitals, health plans,
format; (4) to give patients more control of and access and health-care clearinghouses to process claims and
to their health-care information; and (5) to protect perform other transactions electronically. In an effort
medical records and individually identifiable medical to lower costs and improve efficiency, standards were
information from unauthorized use or disclosure, es- developed to simplify the administration of health in-
pecially in the burgeoning electronic age. surance claims by requiring common formats adopted
as national standards under HIPAA. The standards
Health Insurance Portability require that the same format is used to transmit the
The Health Insurance Portability provision of the Act following health-related information:
(Title I) improves the portability and continuity of
• Claims and equivalent encounter information
health insurance coverage for workers and their families
• Claim status
when they change or lose their jobs by limiting the re-
• Payment and remittance advice
strictions that a group health plan can place on benefits
• Enrollment and disenrollment in a plan
pertaining to a pre-existing condition. A pre-existing
• Eligibility for a plan
condition is a condition for which medical advice, diag-
• Premium payment
nosis, care, or treatment was recommended or received
• Referral certification and authorization
within the 6 months before the enrollment date for a
• Coordination of benefits
new health insurance plan. Pre-existing conditions can
be excluded from health benefits for only 12 months.
A person who did not enroll during the initial or open The Privacy Rule
enrollment period is considered a late enrollee, and Providers have an ethical and legal obligation to safe-
benefits for late enrollees with pre-existing conditions guard patients’ privacy. Because of the requirements of
transmitting sensitive health information electronically, business associate, there must be an agreement that
the Privacy Rule was written to protect the confidenti- the PHI will be handled according to federal and state
ality of individually identifiable health information. The privacy laws. Additionally, a CE may disclose PHI as
rule limits the use and disclosure of certain individually required by law, such as reporting child abuse to state
identifiable health information; gives patients the right child welfare agencies. Treatment covers a wide array of
to access their medical records; restricts most disclosures patient-related activities, including providing health care,
of health information to the minimum needed for coordinating services, referring patients, and consulting
the intended purpose; and establishes safeguards and among providers. Communication between CEs may
restrictions regarding the use and disclosure of records take place using any method, including oral, written,
for certain public responsibilities such as public health, electronic mail, or facsimile, as long as “reasonable and
research, and law enforcement. Under the rule, improper appropriate safeguards” are used to protect the information.
uses or disclosures may be subject to criminal or civil Payment includes activities relating to financial aspects
sanctions prescribed in HIPAA. Federal HIPAA regu- of health care. PHI can be used for billing and claim
lations do not pre-empt any state laws that are stronger processing to obtain reimbursement and for utilization
or more protective of consumers’ security and privacy. review. Health-care operations include a wide range of
administrative and management activities in which CEs
Protected Health Information engage. These include case management and patient care,
and Covered Entities risk management, legal services, credentialing, quality
PHI relates to the past, present, or future physical or assessments and outcomes development, guidelines and
mental health or condition of an individual; the provision protocol development, and training students. Sensitive
of health care to an individual; past, present, or future PHI includes information about certain conditions or
payment for the provision of health care to an individual; their associated treatment, such as HIV status, substance
and information that identifies or could reasonably be abuse, or mental health conditions. Use of PHI refers to
used to identify a protected individual. This information internal use by the CE; disclosure refers to sharing of PHI
may be oral, electronic, paper, or any other form. Individ- for external purposes. Sensitive PHI may not be disclosed
ually identifiable health information includes such data without a patient’s written authorization, except in certain
as name, Social Security number, patient identification circumstances, such as to a consultant who needs this
number (such as a medical record number), address, information to assist in the patient’s health care.
demographic data, or any other information that could Consent Versus Authorization
reasonably allow a person to be identified.
The Privacy Rule applies only to covered entities Consent must be obtained from the patient at the first
(CEs) that transmit medical information electronically. visit before any services are provided. Patients must sign
There are three categories of CEs: (1) health-care pro- a consent form stating that they have been notified
viders, such as doctors, clinics, psychologists, dentists, of the practice’s privacy policy, which explains that
chiropractors, nursing homes, and pharmacies; (2) health the practice may use and disclose PHI for treatment,
plans, including health maintenance organizations payment, and health-care operations. Consent needs to
(HMOs), health insurance companies, and government be obtained only once and is valid until revoked by the
programs that pay for health care, such as Medicare, patient in writing. In an emergency situation, treatment
Medicaid, and the military and veterans’ health-care may be rendered without consent, but consent should
programs; and (3) clearinghouses that electronically be obtained as soon as possible afterward.
transmit medical information, such as billing, claims, For all other uses and disclosures, unless required
enrollment, or eligibility verification. by law, specific authorization must be obtained from
the patient detailing what PHI may be disclosed, to
whom it may be disclosed, and an expiration date. An
Use and Disclosure of Protected authorization is needed to release PHI to life insurance
Health Information companies and patients’ legal counsel. A CE may not
HIPAA has very prescriptive language for the use and give or sell patients’ names for commercial or marketing
disclosure of PHI. A CE may use or disclose PHI purposes. For example, a CE may not give or sell names
without patient authorization for purposes of treatment, of allergy sufferers to pharmaceutical companies that
payment, or its health-care operations. This includes dis- market allergy products.
closures to its agents or to another CE, such as another
health-care provider. Agents are business associates who Individual Rights
perform a function for the CE, such as dictation, legal Patients have the right to review and obtain a copy of
services, billing, and accounting, and are not subject their medical records, except in certain circumstances.
to the Privacy Rule. When a CE discloses PHI to a Exceptions to the rule are psychotherapy notes, information
compiled for lawsuits, and information that, in the opin- health-care provider judges it to be in the patient’s best
ion of the health-care provider, may cause harm to the interest and as long as the patient has not restricted the
patient or another individual. A reasonable, cost-based release of information to that person.
fee may be charged to cover expenses for copying and
postage. If a medical summary of the record is requested, Minors
the fee should be agreed on beforehand. Patients also The Privacy Rule defers to state or other applicable
have the right to request an amendment or correction laws that address the ability of a parent or guardian
if they feel the record is inaccurate or incomplete and to obtain health information about a minor child. In
may submit a written supplement to be included in their most cases, the parent represents the child and has the
record. If the health-care provider declines the request, authority to make health-care decisions about the child;
the provider must do so in writing and allow the patient however, the Privacy Rule specifies three circumstances
to submit a statement of disagreement for inclusion when certain minors may obtain specified health care
in the record. However, the health-care provider must without parental consent:
allow the patient to submit a correction to be placed in
• When state or other law does not require the
the medical record. The CE also may include its own
consent of a parent before a minor can obtain a
rebuttal. A health-care provider may require a patient
particular health-care service, and when the mi-
to come into the office during normal business hours
nor consents to the health-care service. Example:
to access and inspect the record. The provider also may
A state law provides an adolescent the right to
arrange to have someone present who can answer any
obtain mental health treatment without the con-
patient questions or concerns.
sent of the parent, and the adolescent agrees to
Patients have a right to an accounting of certain PHI
such treatment without the parent’s consent.
disclosures by a CE. The CE must be able to report who
• When a court determines, or other law autho-
the recipient was, when the disclosure was made, and
rizes, someone other than the parent to make
for what purpose the disclosure was made. The maximal
treatment decisions for a minor. Example: A court
accounting disclosure period is the 6 years preceding
may grant authority to an adult other than the
the request. Exceptions to this rule include disclosures
parent to make health-care decisions for the mi-
for treatment, payment, or health-care operations; to
nor, such as a stepparent or guardian.
the individual or their representative; pursuant to an
• When a parent agrees to a confidential relation-
authorization; and for national security purposes.
ship between the minor and the physician. Exam-
CEs must take reasonable steps to ensure the con-
ple: A physician asks the parent of a 16-year-old if
fidentiality of communications with the patient. The
the physician can talk with the child confidentially
record should demonstrate how the patient would
about a medical condition and the parent agrees.
prefer to be contacted regarding PHI, including test
results, appointment reminders, or discussions regarding Even in these circumstances, the Privacy Rule defers
his or her medical care. The patient may request to be to state or other laws that require, permit, or prohibit
contacted at an alternative address or telephone number. the CE to disclose to a parent, or provide the parent
A health-care provider may share relevant information access to, a minor child’s PHI. When the laws are un-
with family, friends, or caregivers involved in a patient’s clear, a licensed health-care professional may exercise
health care as long as the patient does not object and professional judgment on whether to provide or deny
the provider feels it is in the patient’s best interest. In- parental access.
formation may not be disclosed to a person not involved When a health-care provider reasonably believes
in the patient’s health care, if disclosure is judged to be that disclosure of PHI to the personal representative
inappropriate by the provider, or if the patient requests who is authorized to make health-care decisions for
nondisclosure. When disclosing PHI, only the minimal an individual may not be in the patient’s best interest,
information needed by that particular person should the provider may choose not to disclose, especially in
be disclosed; for example, a caregiver needs to know situations in which abuse, neglect, and endangerment are
which medications are to be taken, what activity and suspected. For example, if a physician reasonably believes
dietary instructions are prescribed, and what changes in that disclosing information about an incompetent older
condition to report. Details about the patient’s diagnosis individual to the individual’s personal representative
and prognosis may not be necessary and should not be would endanger the patient, the Privacy Rule permits
disclosed unless requested by the patient or the patient’s the physician to decline to make such disclosures.
personal representative. A family member or friend
who is not involved in the patient’s care may be told of Notice of Privacy Practices
the patient’s condition—stable, guarded, critical—but Covered entities are required to develop a privacy pro-
additional information may not be disclosed unless the gram detailing how their practice complies with the
Table 1-2 Elements of a Privacy Policy on the Privacy Rule, to termination. If an employee
does not report observed or suspected violations to a
The policy should outline the following: supervisor or HIPAA officer, that employee may be
1. Describe how PHI is used and disclosed. subject to disciplinary action for failure to report.
2. State the CE’s duty to protect PHI, to provide a Although an individual may not sue anyone over a
notice of its privacy practices, and to abide by the HIPAA violation, a CE may be liable for civil penalties
terms in its notices.
at the state level. A CE’s failure to follow the rules
3. Describe patients’ rights to:
and standards of the HIPAA regulations can result in
• Inspect and copy their PHI
civil penalties of up to $100 per violation with a cap of
• Request a restriction of their PHI by stating the
specific restriction and to whom it applies $25,000 per year. Criminal penalties for violations by
• Request confidential communications from the individuals or CEs range from a $50,000 fine and up
CE by alternative means or at an alternative to 1 year of imprisonment for knowingly obtaining or
location disclosing PHI to a $250,000 fine and up to 10 years of
• Request an amendment to their PHI imprisonment if the offense is committed with intent
• Receive an accounting of certain disclosures to sell, transfer, or use PHI for commercial purposes,
the CE has made
personal gain, or malicious harm.
• Obtain a paper copy of the Notice of Patient
Privacy on their request
• Complain to the CE or to the secretary of Security Rule
HHS if they believe their privacy rights have been
violated Security standards were promulgated to protect elec-
4. Provide a point of contact for further information tronic health information systems from improper
and for submitting complaints to: access or alteration. The confidentiality, integrity,
• A practice’s designated HIPAA officer and availability of electronic PHI must be protected
• The secretary of HHS when it is stored, maintained, or transmitted. CEs are
required to develop and implement administrative,
physical, and technical safeguards to protect against
Privacy Rule. The notice must be provided to patients reasonably anticipated threats of loss or disclosure by
at or before their first encounter, or as soon as feasibly implementing appropriate policies and procedures.
possible in an emergency situation. It must be posted in Periodic security awareness and training of workforce
a clear and prominent location at the practice site and members is required. Administrative safeguards must
on its website, and a written copy should be furnished be in place to ensure the following:
to patients at their request. Written acknowledgment of • Properly authorized personnel have access only to
receipt of the Notice of Privacy Practices by the patient is the PHI they need to perform their job.
desirable; however, a patient may refuse to sign it (often • Prevention, detection, containment, and correc-
in the mistaken belief that signing it means the patient tion of security violations are undertaken, includ-
agrees with it), in which case the CE must document ing sanctions against an employee who violates
the reason for failure to obtain acknowledgment by the the privacy and security of PHI.
patient. Each practice should have a HIPAA privacy • A disaster recovery plan is outlined.
officer or a designated person who is knowledgeable • A process is in place to develop contracts with
in the standards and rules. A HIPAA attorney may be business associates that ensure they will safeguard
consulted in questionable matters when disclosure is a PHI appropriately.
concern. Table 1-2 shows the elements that should be
included in a privacy policy. Physical safeguards include measures that accomplish
the following:
Privacy Violations and Penalties • Limiting physical access to PHI systems while
CEs should have policies and procedures in place ensuring properly authorized access, such as
that describe sanctions for employees who commit keeping computers, printers, and fax machines
violations, such as accessing a medical record for any out of patient and high-traffic areas and installing
purpose outside of treatment, payment, or health-care locking doors and alarm systems.
operations; discussing PHI in public; failing to log off • Providing secure access to workstations, including
or leaving a computer monitor on and unsecured; or guidelines on use of home systems, laptops, cell
copying or compiling PHI with the intent to sell or phones, and other portable or handheld electronic
use it for personal or financial gain. Depending on the devices.
violation, disciplinary actions may range from a letter • Establishing procedures for receipt and removal
in the employee’s file, to requiring additional training of hardware and electronic media containing PHI.
Technical safeguards must be in place that protect and Practices may be audited for HIPAA compliance with
control access to PHI, such as the following: or without notice. New rules and policies are frequently
written, and CEs must be aware of and comply with
• Verifying identity of a person or entity
these. HHS and CMS websites should be monitored
• Allowing access only to people or software pro-
regularly for updates.
grams that have access rights (e.g., using pass-
words, electronic signatures)
• Auditing records and examining activity in infor-
mation systems that contain or use PHI Summary
• Protecting PHI from improper modification or
The requirements for documentation of health-care ser-
destruction
vices have evolved over the past few decades. Health-care
• Preventing unauthorized access to PHI being
records are both medical and legal documents and serve
transmitted over an electronic communications
many purposes. The complexity of documentation reflects
network (e.g., the Internet)
the requirements of payers and regulatory agencies as
• Installing and regularly updating antivirus,
well as the need for clear and concise communication
anti-spyware, and firewall software
among members of the health-care team. Just as the
practice of medicine is both an art and a science, the
Summary of the Act practice of documentation is as well. Whether on paper or
A CE has the responsibility to develop and track a wide electronic based, records created by health-care providers
variety of privacy and security processes and establish must be timely and accurate and reflect good patient
policies and procedures to address all of the HIPAA care, support coding and billing, and meet regulatory
standards. Employees must undergo periodic training requirements. Completing the worksheets that follow
in privacy and security rules. Risk analysis, monitoring, will allow you to reinforce the content of this chapter.
and testing of information systems’ security are essen- And be sure to review Appendix A, the Document
tial to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of data. Library, for full case examples of patient documentation.
Name
General and Medicolegal Principles
1. In addition to other health-care providers, list five different types or groups of people who could read
medical records you create.
2. List at least five general principles of documentation that are based on CMS guidelines.
4. Beside each of the following, indicate whether the statement is acceptable (A) or unacceptable (U)
according to generally accepted documentation guidelines.
_____ Use of either the 1995 or 1997 CMS guidelines
_____ Making a late entry in a chart or medical record
_____ Using correction fluid or tape to obliterate an entry in a record
_____ Making an entry in a record before seeing a patient
_____ Altering an entry in a medical record
_____ Stamping a record “signed but not read”
1. Indicate whether the following statements are true (T) or false (F).
_____ CPT codes reflect the level of evaluation and management services provided.
_____ The three key elements of determining the level of service are history, review of systems,
and physical examination.
_____ Time spent counseling the patient and the nature of the presenting problem are two factors that
affect the level of service provided.
_____ ICD codes indicate the reason for patient services.
_____ The ICD-10 code set has more than 155,000 codes, but it does not have the capacity to
accommodate new diagnoses and procedures.
_____ The medical record must include documentation that supports the assessment.
_____ Assignment of appropriate CPT and ICD codes that support the level of E/M services provided is
dependent only on adequate documentation of the history and physical examination.
_____ An ICD code should be as broad and encompassing as possible.
_____ There is no code for “rule out.”
_____ The complexity of medical decision-making takes into account the number of treatment options.
2. ICD codes are used to identify which of the following? Underline all that apply.
HPI Diagnosis Treatment
Physical exam findings Treating facility Symptoms
Surgical history Complaints Tests ordered
Reason for office visit Level of service Conditions
1. List at least five functions that an EMR system should be able to perform.
1. Indicate whether each statement about the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act is true (T)
or false (F).
_____ Establishes standards for the electronic transfer of health data.
_____ Provides health care for everyone.
_____ Limits exclusion of pre-existing medical conditions to 24 months.
_____ Gives patients more access to their medical records.
_____ Protects medical records from improper uses and disclosures.
_____ Federal HIPAA regulations pre-empt state laws.
_____ The Privacy Rule applies only to covered entities that transmit medical information electronically.
_____ Protected Health Information is data that could be used to identify an individual.
_____ Covered entities include doctors, clinics, dentists, nursing homes, chiropractors, psychologists, phar-
macies, and insurance companies.
_____ A covered entity may disclose PHI without patient authorization for purposes of treatment, pay-
ment, or its health-care operations.
_____ PHI cannot be transmitted between covered entities by e-mail.
_____ Patients are entitled to a list of everyone with whom their health-care provider has shared PHI.
_____ PHI may be disclosed to someone involved in the patient’s health care without written
authorization.
_____ The Privacy Rule allows certain minors access to specified health care, such as mental health coun-
seling, without parental consent.
_____ A Notice of Privacy Practice explains how patients’ PHI is used and disclosed.
_____ An employee cannot be terminated for violating the Privacy Rule.
_____ An individual may not sue his or her insurance company over a HIPAA violation.
_____ Criminal penalties for HIPAA violations can result in fines and imprisonment.
_____ The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of PHI need to be protected only when the PHI is trans-
mitted, not when it is stored.
_____ Employees are required to attend periodic security awareness and training.
_____ The Security Rule requires covered entities to install and regularly update antivirus, anti-spyware,
and firewall software.
_____ Physical and technical safeguards must be in place to prevent PHI from being transmitted over the
Internet.
_____ HIPAA requires a process to develop contracts with business associates that will ensure they will
safeguard PHI.
_____ HIPAA may not audit a practice for compliance without notice.
4. Patients have the right to review and obtain copies of their medical records except in certain circum-
stances. List two of those circumstances.
5. Indicate by yes (Y) or no (N) whether disclosure of PHI to each specific entity in the list would require
patient authorization.
_____ Specialist/consultant
_____ Patient’s health plan
_____ Life insurance company
_____ Hospital accounting department
_____ Patient’s employer
_____ Pharmaceutical companies
_____ Reporting a gunshot wound to police
_____ Reporting names of patients with a communicable disease to a county health department
_____ Reporting suspected child abuse to a child protection agency
_____ Medical billing and coding department
_____ Friends and family involved in a patient’s health care
Name
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 1. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the context
of this chapter.
AMA AP, A.P., A/P
ARRA CE
CMS CP
CPR CPT
EHR E/M
EMR EPR
HHS HIMSS
HIPAA HITECH
HPI HMO
ICD-10 ICD
PMFSH PHI
ROS PRN, prn, P.R.N.
VA URI
23
Figure 2-1 If you use an interpreter when performing an H&P, you will need to document
information about the interpreter in your facility’s EMR (e.g., Cerner) system.
presenting to establish care or for an annual physical. and immunizations. Using subheadings within the
Try to avoid vague terms, such as checkup, and do not PMH, as shown in Table 2-3, makes it easier to locate
document “no problems” in the CC. information and identify the change from one topic
to another.
History of the Present Illness or History If the patient has multiple medical problems, it
of the Chief Complaint may be helpful to document them as an enumerated
list rather than in paragraph format. If the patient has
The history of the present illness (HPI) is a chrono- had any surgery or hospitalizations for major trauma or
logical description of the development of the patient’s other reasons, be sure to include the type of operation
present illness from the first sign or symptom of the and date of the surgery; if known, you can include the
presenting problems. The Centers for Medicare and name of the doctor who ISBN performed the surgery.
Medicaid Services (CMS) published the 1995 and Author
You Sullivan
should document a6662
#
medication list
Author's review
as partOKof the
(if needed)
1997 Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and PMH. Fig. This#
includes both prescription medications and
Document name
Correx
Table 2-2 History of Present Illness Table 2-3 Subheadings Used for Past Medical
Mnemonics History
Mnemonic Explanation • Past Medical History
PQRST P—palliative or provocative factors • Medical
Q—quality of pain • Surgical/hospitalizations
R—region affected • Medications
S—severity of pain • Allergies
• Health maintenance/immunizations
T—timing
LOCATES L—location
O—onset
C—character and gender. Chapters 5, 6, and 7 discuss documenta-
A—associated signs and symptoms tion of health maintenance activities and immuniza-
T—timing tions in the pediatric, adult, and older adult patient,
E—exacerbating/relieving factors respectively.
S—severity
OLD CHARTS O—onset Family History
L—location Typically, you should document the medical history
D—duration of first-degree relatives, that is, the family history
CH—character (FH) for parents, grandparents, siblings, and children.
A—alleviating/aggravating Remember that a spouse’s medical history is not
R—radiation considered part of the patient’s FH, although it may
T—temporal pattern be applicable in situations in which a couple presents
S—symptoms associated because of infertility or genetic counseling. Document
COLDERAS C—character the age and status (living, deceased, health status) of
O—onset the first-degree relatives. If those relatives are deceased,
L—location include the age at time of death and cause of death. If
D—duration the relatives are still living, document their current age
E—exacerbating factors and medical conditions, paying particular attention to
R—relieving factors those conditions that have a familial tendency such as
A—associated signs and symptoms cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and certain cancers,
S—severity osteoporosis, and sleep apnea. Also determine whether
LIQORAAA L—location any first-degree relatives have or had the condition with
I—intensity which the patient is presenting. In addition to medical
Q—quality conditions, inquire about any substance abuse, addic-
O—onset tions, depression, or other mental health conditions of
R—radiation family members.
A—associated signs and symptoms
A—alleviating factors Social History
A—aggravating factors One of the main goals of documenting the social
QFLORIDAA Q—quality history (SH) of the patient is to identify factors out-
F—frequency side of past or current medical conditions that may
L—location influence the patient’s overall health or behaviors that
O—onset create risk factors for specific conditions. These risk
R—radiation factors include use of tobacco, alcohol, and drugs.
I—intensity If these risk factors are present, document quantity
D—duration of use and how long the use has occurred. Smoking
A—alleviating/aggravating history should include number of packs per day and
A—associated signs and symptoms the number of years the patient has smoked. If the
patient formerly smoked or used smokeless tobacco,
you still should document the details of the tobacco
conditions, document these conditions under the use with the addition of how long it has been since
heading of Medical Conditions rather than Allergies. the patient quit. Avoid ambiguous terms such as
The health maintenance and immunization section social drinker that do not assist you or other readers in
of the PMH will vary according to the patient’s age determining whether there is a risk factor associated
with substance use. Typically, the use of illegal sub- special events, spirituality, and taboos. Table 2-4 shows
stances is documented as drug use, but also you should questions that you can ask as part of the religious and
determine whether the patient is taking substances cultural history.
prescribed for someone else or misusing prescription Document nutritional information in terms of type of
medication. If a risk factor is identified, be sure to diet the patient follows, caffeine intake, and food allergies
include it in the problem list and assessment and or avoidances. If there are questions or concerns about a
plan. Age-specific SH is discussed in other chapters. patient’s diet, it may be helpful to record a “typical day”
Information about the patient’s sexual orientation, or “last 24 hours” of food intake. Sedentary lifestyle is
gender identification, marital status, and number of a risk factor for certain diseases, so document whether
children is included. Documentation of the patient’s the patient exercises. If the patient exercises, include
past and current employment may help identify the type, frequency, and duration of exercise.
potential occupational hazards. Include any military One basic consideration of a patient’s ability to ac-
service and where stationed (stateside or overseas) as cess health care is whether the patient has health-care
well as any possible exposures. If the patient has lived insurance or some other form of payment, such as
or traveled abroad, document locations and potential Social Security or workers’ compensation. Although
exposures, if any. It is important to document the pa- financial records generally should be kept separate from
tient’s educational level and ability to read and write. the medical records, you should document whether the
If the patient speaks more than one language, you patient is insured or uninsured. If uninsured, information
should document which language the patient prefers. about income or ability to self-pay becomes essential.
Religion and religious and cultural beliefs may The provision or lack of insurance will guide many
have an impact on a patient’s overall health. It can health-care choices, especially related to prescribing
be difficult to determine the difference between a re- medications. Using generic instead of brand-name
ligious belief and a cultural belief, although typically medications will result in cost savings for the patient
it is not necessary to do so. Specific documentation and is often medically neutral, meaning the patient
of the religious and cultural history includes beliefs should get the same benefit from generic as from
related to health and illness, family, symbols, nutrition, brand-name medications.
• Ears: integrity, color, landmarks, and mobility of Table 2-7 Muscle Strength Grading
the tympanic membranes; tenderness, discharge,
external canal, tenderness of auricles, nodules. Grade Meaning
• Nose: symmetry, alignment of septum, nasal 0 No motion or muscular contraction detected
patency, appearance of turbinates, presence of 1 Barely detectable motion
discharge, polyps, palpation of frontal and max- 2 Active motion with gravity eliminated
illary sinuses. 3 Active motion against gravity
• Mouth/throat: lips, teeth, gums, tongue, buccal 4 Active motion against some resistance
mucosa, tonsillar size, exudate, erythema. 5 Active motion against full resistance
• Neck: ROM, cervical and clavicular lymph nodes,
thyroid examination, position and mobility of the
trachea.
• Respiratory: effort of breathing, breath sounds, mobility of the cervix; cervical motion tender-
adventitious sounds, chest wall expansion, sym- ness, uterine or ovarian enlargement, masses,
metry of breathing, diaphragmatic excursion. tenderness, adnexal masses or tenderness.
• Cardiovascular: heart sounds, murmurs or extra • Rectal: hemorrhoids, fissures, sphincter tone,
sounds, rhythm, point of maximal impulse, masses, rectocele; if stool is present, color and
peripheral edema, central and peripheral pulses, consistency of stool, test stool for occult blood;
varicosities, venous hums, bruits. prostate examination for males, noting size,
• Breast: symmetry, inspection for dimpling of skin, uniformity, nodules, tenderness.
nipple discharge, palpation for tenderness, cyst or • Musculoskeletal: symmetry of upper and lower ex-
masses, axillary nodes, gynecomastia in males. tremities, ROM of joints, joint swelling, redness or
• Abdomen: shape (flat, scaphoid, distended, obese), tenderness, amputations; inspection and palpation
bowel sounds, masses, organomegaly, tenderness, of spine for kyphosis, lordosis, scoliosis, musculature,
inguinal nodes. range of motion, muscles for spasm, or tenderness.
• Male genitalia or gynecological (breast • Neurological:
examination sometimes documented here). • Mental status: level of alertness; orientation to
• Male genitalia: hair distribution, nits, testes, person, time, place, and circumstances; psychiat-
scrotum, penis, circumcised or uncircumcised, ric mental status or mini–mental state examina-
varicocele, masses, tenderness. tions if indicated.
• Gynecological: External—inspection of the • Cranial nerves: see Table 2-6 for details of the
perineum for lesions, nits, hair distribution, areas 12 cranial nerves and their functions.
of swelling or tenderness, labia and labial folds, • Motor: strength testing of upper and lower
Skenes and Bartholin glands, vaginal introitus; extremity muscle groups proximally and dis-
noting any discharge or cystocele if present. tally graded on a scale of 0 to 5 as shown in
Internal—inspect vaginal walls and cervix for Table 2-7.
color, discharge, lesions, bleeding, atrophy; • Cerebellum: Romberg test, heel to shin, finger
inspect cervical os for size and shape; bimanual to nose, heel-and-toe walking, rapid alternating
examination for size, shape, consistency and movements.
Laboratory and Diagnostic Studies 2. Diabetes, not well controlled: review of home
glucose monitoring logs shows fasting range of
Following documentation of the H&P, document the
150 to 180.
results of any studies, such as laboratory tests, radio-
3. New-onset left leg swelling: no trauma, no er y-
graphs, or other imaging studies. All results should be
thema. Pulses are present. Concern for deep vein
specifically recorded. For instance, rather than docu-
thrombosis (DVT).
menting, “the complete blood count (CBC) is normal,”
Plan:
document the value for each part of the CBC. This is
1. Stop ACE inhibitor. Will switch to losar tan 50 mg
done for several reasons. First, it presents the actual
once daily.
values and allows readers of the H&P to formulate
2. Check HgbA1C; continue metformin, add
their own conclusions regarding the meaning of the
g lipizide 5 mg twice daily. Continue home glucose
values. Second, it documents the baseline values that
monitoring.
the patient has as a reference point. Third, it saves time
3. Left leg Doppler flow study.
for other readers to have the values listed rather than
Return to clinic in 2 weeks.
having to look them up.
Assessment/Plan:
Problem List, Assessment, and 1. Cough: nonproductive and no signs or symptoms
of infectious process. Recently star ted an ACE in-
Differential Diagnosis hibitor, so may be side effect of medication. Stop
Once you have documented all the elements of ACE inhibitor. Will switch to losar tan 50 mg once
the H&P and results of diagnostic studies, you can daily.
evaluate all the information to identify the patient’s 2. Diabetes, not well controlled: review of home glu-
problems. Use a numbered list that includes the date cose monitoring logs shows fasting range of 150
of onset and whether a particular problem is active to 180. Check HgbA1C; continue metformin, add
or inactive. List the most severe problems first. After glipizide 5 mg twice daily. Continue home glucose
the initial list is generated, new problems are listed monitoring.
chronologically. 3. New-onset left leg swelling: no trauma, no
Make an assessment of each current problem. This er ythema. Pulses are present. Concern for DVT;
entails a brief evaluation of the problem with differential left leg Doppler flow study.
diagnosis. This is a very important component of the Return to clinic in 2 weeks.
comprehensive H&P because it demonstrates your
judgment and documents the medical decision-making
that you considered regarding each problem. Sample Comprehensive History and
Plan of Care Physical Examination
A sample comprehensive H&P for Mr. William Jensen
Document any additional studies or workup needed,
is shown in Figure 2-2. Mr. Jensen is a new patient to
referrals or consultations needed, pharmacological man-
the practice of Dr. Vernon Scott, and you will follow
agement, nonpharmacological or other management,
his medical course through the documentation of his
patient education, and disposition such as “return to
encounters with a surgeon, his admission to the hospital,
clinic” or “admit to the hospital.”
surgery, hospital course, and discharge. In addition to
There are different ways that you can document the
documentation related to Mr. Jensen, you will have the
assessment and plan. Sometimes you will see assess-
opportunity to evaluate other documentation.
ment and plan documented as numbered or bulleted
lists under separate headings, or you may see them
together. Example 2.1 demonstrates the difference
in these approaches. Either is acceptable and which Summary
is used depends largely on health-care provider pref-
The comprehensive history and physical examination
erence and whether documentation is paper-based
(H&P) is one of the most important documents in
or EMR-based.
the patient’s entire medical record. The H&P will vary
somewhat in content at different ages and stages of life
EXAMPLE 2.1
and among different medical disciplines as discussed
Assessment: in other chapters; however, the structure of the H&P
1. Cough: nonproductive and no signs or symptoms is typically the same. Typically, you will complete the
of infectious process. Recently star ted an comprehensive H&P at an initial patient visit in the
a ngiotensin-conver ting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, ambulatory setting, and documentation of subsequent
so may be side effect of medication. visits will not be as detailed. The goal of the H&P is to
CHIEF COMPLAINT: “I’ve been feeling tired and I have lost some weight.”
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a 67-year-old Caucasian male who is a new patient to this practice, having recently
moved to the area. Mr. Jensen complains of “feeling tired.” He states this has been going on for several months. He first noticed this
when he and his wife went on a short hike that he had previously completed without difficulty. Initially, he thought he had a mild
“flu-like illness” that would account for his fatigue. The fatigue is worsened with exertional activity. Other than rest, he has not
identified any alleviating factors. Mr. Jensen states that he has lost approximately 10 pounds in the past 2 months without any
change in his diet or activity level. His appetite is good, and he has not intentionally decreased his food intake or avoided any type
of food. Other than these two complaints, he feels well.
Surgical:
1. Repair of a torn rotator cuff, right shoulder (Dr. Rodriquez, Grand Rapids, MI), age 45
2. Left inguinal herniorrhaphy (Dr. Simmons, Grand Rapids, MI) at age 38
Medications:
1. Lotensin HCT 20/12.5 once daily in the morning
2. Mevacor 20 mg once daily in the afternoon
3. Multivitamin once daily (One A Day for men)
4. Fish oil supplement twice daily, morning and evening
Over-the-counter medications include occasional acetaminophen for mild headache or pain.
Allergies: Mr. Jensen states an allergy to PENICILLIN DRUGS that causes him to break out in a rash.
Health Maintenance: Last complete physical was 2 years ago. He had a screening colonoscopy at age 52 but has not had one
since. He believes his PSA level was checked at the physical 2 years ago but does not recall the result. He has not had any
routine blood work since his physical 2 years ago. That physical was done by Dr. Susan Maxwell in Michigan, where he
previously resided.
Immunizations: Mr. Jensen did get a flu vaccine September 20XX, and his last tetanus immunization was in 20XX. He has
never had the pneumonia vaccine.
FAMILY HISTORY: Father is deceased, age 74, complications of COPD and alcoholism. Mother is deceased, age 70, breast cancer.
One sibling, age 71, who also has hypertension. One sibling, deceased, age 20, secondary to gunshot wound sustained in combat.
Three children, alive and well, no significant medical history. Negative family history of diabetes, myocardial infarction. Positive
family history of cancer (breast), hypertension/CAD, and COPD.
SOCIAL HISTORY: Mr. Jensen is married and lives in a single-story home with his wife. They have three adult children who all live
nearby. Mr. Jensen is sexually active with his wife as his only partner. All sexual encounters have been heterosexual. Mr. Jensen
smokes a pipe about 3 times a week and has done so for approximately 26 years. He does not use any smokeless tobacco, drink
alcohol, or use any recreational drugs. He is still active and walks approximately 2 miles 4 of 7 days per week. He also bicycles and
hikes occasionally. Current symptoms have affected his exercise tolerance. He does not follow a prescribed diet consistently. He
limits salt intake and avoids fried foods. He eats fish twice a week, but does not eat many fresh fruits or vegetables. He estimates
three or fewer servings of fruits and vegetables daily. He does not have much fiber intake. His caffeine intake includes 2–3 cups of
coffee daily and 1–2 soft drinks daily. He does not have any food intolerances or food allergies. Mr. Jensen’s primary language is
English. He completed an undergraduate degree and trade school. He is a retired electrician. Mr. Jensen occasionally attends a
Methodist church. He states prayer is important to him, and he believes that God can heal people through prayer. He likes to include
his wife in decision-making about his health care, as she is a retired nurse and has medical power of attorney for him. Mr. Jensen
has a living will. He is willing to accept blood transfusions and would accept organ transplantation if needed. He is an organ donor.
In addition to Medicare, he has a supplemental insurance plan that covers hospitalization and some outpatient treatment.
REVIEW OF SYSTEMS:
Constitutional: Easily fatigued, feels weak. Denies any near-syncope or lightheadedness. He denies any fever or chills. No sleep
disturbances.
Eyes: He has worn glasses since 1985. Denies loss of vision, double vision, or history of cataracts.
(Continued)
ENT: No hearing loss, no prior ear surgery, no recent infections. Denies nasal drainage. Denies chronic sinus infections
or epistaxis. Denies chronic or recurrent sore throat. No dentures or dental appliances. Last dental visit was 3 months ago.
Cardiovascular: Specifically denies chest pain, angina, and pleuritic pain. Denies any heart palpitations or irregularities in
rhythm. No history of heart murmur. Denies peripheral edema and claudication. Last ECG was 2 years ago at his physical.
Respiratory: He denies SOB, DOE, or hemoptysis. Last chest x-ray was 2 years ago. He does not recall ever having testing for TB.
Gastrointestinal: He has experienced a 10-pound unintentional weight loss over the past 2 months. He denies any change in
appetite, any difficulty swallowing or chewing. Some “indigestion” self-treated with liquid antacid. Rarely occurs more than twice per
week and has always been relieved with antacid. His bowel movements are solid, and he has not noticed any frank blood. He
states that in the past month, his stool is sometimes “tarry.” No constipation or diarrhea. No change in bowel habits. No hemorrhoids.
Genitourinary: Denies any penile discharge or erectile dysfunction. No nocturia, dribbling, incontinence, or loss of force of stream.
Musculoskeletal: Denies any joint swelling or loss of range of motion. No history of arthritis or any joint pain.
Integumentary: Denies rashes or moles. No skin lesions he is concerned about. He sees a dermatologist once a year for full skin
examination.
Neurological: Denies recurrent headaches. No syncope or seizures. Denies any problems with balance or coordination.
Psychiatric: Denies any depression or mood swings. Denies any history of mental illness, drug, or alcohol abuse.
Hematologic/Lymphatic: Denies easy bruising or bleeding from gums. Denies any swollen glands. No history of anemia. He has
never had a blood transfusion.
Allergic/Immunologic: No asthma or atopy. Denies frequent or recurrent infections. Has never had HIV testing.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
General: Mr. Jensen is a well-developed, well-nourished Caucasian male who is alert and cooperative. He is a good historian
and answers questions appropriately.
Vital Signs: BP 142/80; P 86 and regular, R 16 and regular; Temp 97.8 orally. His current weight is 174 pounds. Height is 5’10”.
BMI is 25.
Skin: Intact, no lesions or rashes noted. Turgor is good. There is no cyanosis, pallor, or jaundice.
HEENT: Head normocephalic, atraumatic. Pupils equal and reactive to light. Wearing glasses. No AV nicking, hemorrhage, or
exudate seen on fundoscopic exam. Disc margins are sharp, no cupping or edema. TMs intact bilaterally without erythema or
effusion. External auditory canal is patent, no swelling. Nares patent bilaterally. No polyps noted. Nasal mucosa pink without
rhinorrhea. No sinus tenderness. Oropharynx without erythema or exudate. Buccal mucosa intact without lesions. Dentition is
good, and gums are pink, not inflamed.
Neck: Supple, full range of motion. No thyromegaly. No carotid bruits. No masses palpated. No tracheal deviation noted.
Respiratory: Breath sounds clear to auscultation in all lung fields. Chest wall expansion and diaphragmatic excursion
symmetrical, no increased effort of breathing.
Cardiovascular: Heart regular rate and rhythm. No murmurs, gallops, or rubs. No bruit of abdominal aorta. Distal pulses are 3
and symmetrical bilaterally. No peripheral edema.
Abdomen: Soft, nontender. No distention, masses, or organomegaly. No dullness to percussion. Bowel sounds physiological in
all four quadrants. There is no guarding or rebound noted.
Genitalia: External genitalia exam reveals a circumcised male, both testes descended. No testicular or scrotal masses
noted.
Rectal: Prostate nontender, not enlarged. Firm dark stool noted in rectal vault. Good sphincter tone. Stool is positive for
blood.
Musculoskeletal: Fully weight-bearing. Full ROM all extremities. Well-healed surgical scars noted right anterior shoulder
and left inguinal canal. No joint effusions, clubbing, cyanosis, or edema.
Neurological: Alert and oriented x 3, cooperative. Mood and affect appropriate to situation. CN II–XII grossly intact.
Motor: 5/5 upper and lower extremities. Sensory intact to pinprick. DTRs 2 bilaterally and symmetrical.
(Continued)
Laboratory Data:
CBC: WBC 5,800; Hct 46; Hgb 13, differential unremarkable. Peripheral smear shows normochromic, normocytic cells
Chemistry: triglycerides 178; LDL 208; total cholesterol 267; otherwise WNL.
UA: negative for blood, nitrite, leukocytes.
ECG: normal sinus rhythm, no ectopic beats, no ischemia.
PROBLEM LIST/ASSESSMENT:
1. Fatigue.
2. Occult blood in stool.
These symptoms, along with anemia and weight loss, suggestive of colon cancer. Pt will need to undergo colonoscopy
for biopsy. Will call Dr. Michael Bennett’s office to schedule as soon as possible.
3. Hypertension, well controlled.
4. Dyslipidemia, fairly well controlled.
PLAN:
1. Refer to Dr. Michael Bennett for colonoscopy and biopsy.
2. Chest x-ray for baseline.
3. Continue present medications for hypertension, dyslipidemia.
4. OK to continue vitamin and fish oil supplements.
elicit detailed information about the patient’s medical of life. Completing the worksheets that follow will help
history in order to identify risk factors, guide decisions reinforce the material presented in this chapter. And be
for health maintenance, and to identify and treat con- sure to review Appendix A, the Document Library, for
ditions that will impact the patient’s health and quality full case examples of patient documentation.
Name
1. Does this document meet the CMS guidelines for documentation of a comprehensive H&P?
Why or why not?
3. Did any questions come to mind that you are unable to answer after reading the H&P?
4. Are the diagnoses listed in the Assessment section reasonably supported by the history? Why or why not?
5. Did you identify other differential diagnoses or conditions that could be included in the assessment?
If so, list.
6. Is the plan reasonable based on the assessments listed? Why or why not?
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: D. A. presents with a persistent nonproductive cough. She denies trauma. She states
the pain lasts all day long. Food and liquids do not make a difference in the cough. Pain is 6/10. Emesis, no fever.
PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: Usual childhood illnesses. UTD on immunizations. Tonsillectomy in 1980. Last physical 2 years ago and
was normal.
Allergies: Penicillin. Seasonal allergies each spring and fall with mild symptoms. She does not take any medications.
FAMILY HISTORY: Both parents were killed in a car accident. Father 56 and mother 49 at time of death.
SOCIAL HISTORY: Homemaker. Lives in house with spouse and children. She has a bachelor’s degree.
REVIEW OF SYMPTOMS:
General: Blood pressure is 130/86; pulse is 84, respirations are 16 and nonlabored while at rest, temperature is 98.6ºF.
While seen in the clinic, she coughs about every 5 minutes; the cough is dry, coarse, and nonproductive.
CV: Patient denies palpitations, edema, or swelling of the extremities, dizziness, hypertension. Pt states that she has
SOB with exertion, orthopnea while going to bed that is relieved with sitting up, nocturnal dyspnea, no SOB at rest, and
no chest pain.
Respiration: Pt states she has SOB with activity and when lying down at night; TB test 5 years ago was negative; no SOB
at rest, cough present every 5 minutes during the day and worse at night, but denies sputum production, hemoptysis,
dizziness, and asthma.
HEENT: Pt denies head or nasal congestion, headache, discharge from the nose, dizziness, otalgia, vertigo, but states
she does have occasional sneezing, rhinitis, and allergy symptoms in the spring.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
General: White female in acute distress, coughs several times a minute. Good hygiene.
Skin: Warm and slightly moist, erythema, and moles. No scars, rashes, bruises, tattoos; hair with fine consistency, no nail pitting.
HEENT: Atraumatic, no lesions. Glasses, PEARL, EOMs intact, no conjunctival injection, no papilledema, no lesions. Ears
symmetrical, no tenderness or discharge. No turbinate inflammation, no frontal or maxillary sinus tenderness. Patient has
watery discharge from nose, but mucosa was pink and moist. No dentures, no exudates, good hygiene.
Abdomen: No scars, soft, tender to palpation in upper quadrants bilaterally. No masses, no guarding, no rebound. Bowel
sounds present, liver and spleen are within normal limits.
Neurological: CN II–XII intact, sensation intact, strength 5/5 and equal bilaterally. Reflexes 2+ and equal bilaterally,
no cerebellar dysfunction, no limp or foot drop.
A: 1. Pneumonia
2. S/P tonsillectomy
7\OHU0DUWLQ06,,,
Author ISBN #
38 Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. Author's
All review
rights reserved.
Sullivan (if needed)
6662 OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
UF02_01 6662_C_UF02_01.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
02_Sullivan_Ch02.indd 38 7/4/18 3:57 PM
Initials
Worksheet 2.2
Name
1. Does this document meet the CMS guidelines for documentation of a comprehensive H&P?
Why or why not?
2. Critically analyze the H&P and list any errors. Identify the strengths of the H&P.
3. Did any questions come to mind that you are unable to answer after reading the H&P?
4. Are the conditions listed in the Assessment section reasonably supported by the history? Why or why not?
5. Did you identify other differential diagnoses or conditions that could be included in the assessment?
If so, list.
8. Is the plan reasonable based on the assessments listed? Why or why not?
CHIEF COMPLAINT: “My usual doctor moved out of state, so I’m changing to this clinic.”
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: The patient does not have any complaints at this time.
Surgical: Appendectomy at age 14, done as an outpatient with uneventful recovery. She does not recall the name of her surgeon.
She lived in Ohio at the time of the operation. Denies major trauma requiring surgery.
Gynecological: G3, P2, AB1. Menarche age 12. Regular 28-day cycles. Took oral contraceptives for approximately 8 years; has not
taken for 2 years since her husband had a vasectomy. She had a Pap smear approx. 15 months ago and was told it was normal. Has not
had mammography. Patient states that she does breast self-examination “sporadically”; estimates that she does 4 to 5 self-exams per year.
Medications: She takes OTC Aleve 1 or 2 tablets as needed for minor headache or muscle aches. She takes Imitrex injections as
needed for migraines.
Allergies: Allergic to codeine; states she gets severe nausea if she takes but denies associated rash or respiratory problems.
She is allergic to shellfish and experiences hives and swelling of the lips if consumed.
Health Maintenance: Last complete physical approximately 15 months ago. Pt states “everything was normal.” Patient denies ever having a
blood transfusion. She is unsure of the date of her last tetanus immunization. States that she doesn’t recall having any immunizations “as an
adult.” She has never had TB skin testing that she recalls; has not had an ECG. Remembers having a chest x-ray after the birth of one of her
children but does not remember when that was. She is not sure why she had the chest x-ray but states she developed a fever after delivery.
FAMILY HISTORY: Father is living, age 68, and is in fair health. Mother is living, age 63 and in good health. One brother, age 39,
who had stomach ulcers but is otherwise in good health. There is no history of familial diseases.
SOCIAL HISTORY: The patient is married and has 2 children, ages 8 and 5. They live in a two-story home. She has a master’s
degree in economics. She teaches part-time at a community college. All family members are insured through her husband’s employer.
She is fluent in English and Spanish, speaks English at home because her husband does not speak Spanish. Her only sexual partner
is her husband. She previously smoked 1/2 pack of cigarettes per day for approx. 9 years; quit when she wanted to get pregnant with
her first child and has not smoked since. She drinks 1 or 2 glasses of wine most days of the week and more on “special occasions.”
She denies any recreational or illicit drug use. She does not have any religious preference or special practices. She sometimes
practices meditation when she does yoga. She says it is important for her to be involved in decision-making regarding her health, and
she would seek advice from a close friend who is a nurse. She prefers to try self-treatment with OTC and herbal products for minor
illnesses but is not averse to conventional medical treatment. She does not have any food intolerances, only the shellfish allergy. She
eats at least 2 servings of fruits daily and 1 to 2 servings of vegetables daily. She limits red meat to one serving per week. She avoids
fried foods and tries to keep cholesterol and fat intake low. She does not follow any specific dietary guidelines. She does not have
more than two caffeinated beverages a day. She is willing to accept blood transfusion or organ transplantation if needed; she is a
registered donor. She does not have a living will or medical power of attorney. She states her husband would make medical decisions
for her if she was unable. She exercises 4 to 5 times a week for 45 to 60 minutes, either jogging or yoga.
REVIEW OF SYMPTOMS:
Constitutional: Denies fever, chills, night sweats, fatigue.
Eyes: Photophobia at times, only in association with migraine headaches. Resolves with treatment of HA. Denies any change in
vision, double vision, eye pain. Unsure of date of last eye exam. Has never worn glasses or contact lenses.
ENT: Denies any change in hearing or loss of hearing. Denies ear pain, tinnitus. Denies loss of smell or change in sense of
smell. No history of nasal polyps. Denies rhinorrhea, sneezing, sinus infections, epistaxis. Last dental exam about 4 months ago
for general cleaning. Wisdom teeth extracted at age 19 without complications. Denies odontalgia, bleeding of gums.
CV: States “rings feel tight for a few days, then after my period everything goes back to normal.” Denies chest pain, palpitations,
exercise intolerance. States that her parents were told she had a heart murmur as a child; does not recall any surgery or other
intervention. Has never been told that she has a murmur as an adult.
GI: Occasional nausea associated with migraines, usually without vomiting if HA is treated early enough. She has noticed weight loss
of approx. 5 lb in the past 4 to 6 weeks without any change in diet or exercise. She states that she feels like she is eating the same
amount or more, saying that occasionally she will feel hungry sooner after a regular meal. Denies abdominal pain, bloating, vomiting.
Bowel habits have not changed significantly, although patient states she might have 2 or 3 bowel movements some days but generally
has only one. Denies diarrhea; no hemorrhoids.
(Continued)
Gynecological: per PMH. Denies vaginal discharge, dyspareunia. No history of sexually transmitted infections. Last clinical breast
exam about 15 months ago; Pap smear at that time was “normal” per pt.
MSK: Denies joint pains, loss of movement in any joints. Had fracture of the right radius and ulna at age 13, wore cast; no problems since.
Integumentary: Has noticed increased dryness of skin in the past few months. Denies associated pruritus. Has been using a
moisturizing lotion with some improvement. Denies lesions or moles. Denies changes in texture of hair or nails.
Neurological: Has had migraine headaches since early 20s. Used to occur almost monthly, but after having her children says
they have occurred much less frequently. She goes 6 months or longer without any HAs. When they occur, she generally wakes
up early morning with the headache. If she uses the Imitrex right away, HA will resolve within an hour or 2. If she delays using
Imitrex, she will usually experience nausea and photophobia. Cannot identify any specific HA triggers. Has never needed more
than one dose of Imitrex to resolve HA. Denies head trauma, seizure activity.
Psychiatric: States that she sometimes feels “anxious or jumpy for no reason.” She has had 2 or 3 episodes of feeling this way
in the past 2 weeks. Cannot identify any precipitating factor. States, “I just go about my business and wait for it to go away. This
isn’t like me; I’m not usually a worry-wart.” She denies sleep disturbances, hallucinations, depression.
Hematologic/Lymphatic: Denies easy bruising or episodes of easy or prolonged bleeding. Has not noticed any enlarged lymph nodes.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
General: This is a 36-year-old Hispanic woman who appears her stated age. She is articulate and a good historian. She is alert
and oriented and does not appear anxious at the present time. Grooming and affect are appropriate.
Skin: Good turgor, no lesions. No excessive dryness noted; no dryness or flaking of scalp or hair.
HEENT: Head normocephalic, atraumatic. PEARL bilaterally. TMs intact bilaterally without erythema or effusion. Bony landmarks
well visualized. Nares patent bilaterally. No polyps. Nasal mucosa pink and moist, no rhinorrhea. Oropharnyx without tonsillar
enlargement, erythema, or exudates. Buccal mucosa moist without lesions. Natural dentition, teeth stable. No gingivitis.
Abdomen: Soft, nondistended. No organomegaly or masses. Bowel sounds are present and physiological in all four quadrants.
Rectal exam: Soft brown stool in vault. Hemoccult negative. Good sphincter tone.
Back: Spine straight without scoliosis or kyphosis. No tenderness. Full ROM of spine. No CVA tenderness.
Neurological: Cranial nerves II to XII intact. Sensory intact. Motor is 5/5. Patellar reflexes 3/4, all others 2/4; no clonus. Negative
Romberg. Gait is balanced and coordinated without ataxia.
ASSESSMENT:
1. Unintentional 5 lb weight loss. R/O thyroid disorder; with anxiety and hyperreflexia, Graves disease is likely.
2. Migraine headaches, stable.
PLAN:
1. CBC, CMP, TSH, T3, T4, UA. Consider endocrinology referral depending on lab results.
2. Continue Imitrex injectable, 0.6 mg Subcutaneous PRN migraine HA. Rx given.
3. Return in 1 week to review lab results.
4. Schedule well-woman exam within next month.
6X]HWWH%DUQHV13
Author ISBN #
42 Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. Author's
All review
rights reserved.
Sullivan (if needed)
6662 OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
UF02_02_p2 6662_C_UF02_02_p2.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/27/18
AB/CO Editor's review
Check if revision X
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
02_Sullivan_Ch02.indd 42 7/4/18 3:57 PM
Initials
Worksheet 2.3
Name
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 2. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the content
of this chapter.
ACE SOAP
CBC BMI
CMS CC
CV DVT
EMR EOM
ENT GI
FH H&P
GU HEENT
HDL MSK
HPI PSA
LDL ROS
PMH SH
ROM
Introduction Subjective
Although it is necessary to perform and document a It is beyond the scope of this book to address interviewing
comprehensive history and physical examination (H&P) techniques and interpersonal skills; you should employ
at the beginning of the patient–provider relationship, it your best communication techniques when interviewing
is unnecessary and too time consuming to document that the patient and obtaining the history that will make
level of detail at subsequent visits. It is unlikely that much up the Subjective portion of the SOAP note. (Several
of the history information would change if the patient reference texts that deal with medical interviewing
has frequent visits for monitoring chronic conditions. are listed in the bibliography.) Although all parts of
Also, the comprehensive H&P may be documented at a SOAP note are important, your ability to take and
times when the patient does not present with a specific record an accurate medical history is one of the most
complaint. At other times, visits are problem focused, important tasks to be mastered in medicine. In 1947,
either for monitoring of chronic conditions or for Platt claimed that, in most cases, the diagnosis can be
evaluation of a new problem. One way to document made with the history alone. In 1975, Hampton and
problem-focused visits is with a SOAP note. SOAP colleagues attempted to evaluate the relative contribu-
stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. tions of history taking, the physical examination, and
The SOAP format is used in many different practice laboratory tests in making medical diagnoses. Nearly 20
settings. It is important to understand that sections years later, Peterson and colleagues undertook a study
of the SOAP note are interrelated. The completeness to quantitate the relative contributions of the history,
and accuracy of the history (subjective information) physical examination, and laboratory investigation in
will help guide what you look for when performing making medical diagnoses. They found that history
a problem-specific physical examination (objective taking led to the final diagnosis in 61 of 80 patients, or
information) and formulating a list of possible causes, 76% of encounters. More recent studies have validated
also known as differential diagnoses (DDX). Together, these findings. With all the technological advances and
the subjective and objective information should lead the availability of diagnostic testing, the temptation is
you to, and should support, the assessment or most to minimize or abbreviate the history taking, but doing
likely diagnosis. Once you have made an assessment, so may jeopardize your ability to reach an accurate
you can establish a plan of care. diagnosis. Obtaining an adequate history often will
45
Figure 3-1 The CC is best recorded in the patient’s own words, but, in some EMRs, you may have to
choose the CC from a list.
take the most time during a patient encounter, but Subjective information is what the “subject” or patient tells
this is time well spent. Likewise, the attention given to you. As discussed in Chapter 2, the chief complaint (CC)
documenting the Subjective portion of a SOAP note is best recorded in the patient’s own words, but, in some
is equally important. electronic medical records (EMRs), you may have to choose
The elements of the comprehensive H&P that are the CC from a list, as shown in Figure 3-1. Sometimes,
identified as subjective information are as follows: subjective information is obtained
Author ISBN # from someoneAuthor's review other than
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
• Chief complaint (CC) the patient.
Fig. #
A spouse or family
Document name
member, a caregiver, OK
and
Correx
AB
h
istory (PMH) prior medical r ecords. If someone otherEditor's
Check if revision thanreview the patient
• Problem-focused or pertinent family history (FH) providesB /the
W X history,
4/C document2/C who provided
2nd color
PMS the history
OK Correx
For instance, when asked if she takes any medication, eventually lead to the most likely diagnosis. Try to anticipate
a patient responds, “Yes, I take a little red pill for my what information other readers want to know, such as
blood pressure.” You could guess what that little red pill the presence or absence of certain findings, and be sure
may be, but for the sake of accuracy, it would be better that the information is included in your documentation.
to document this information using the patient’s own For example, if an 18-month-old child presents with a
words (patient takes “a little red pill” for hypertension). history of fever and a rash, and the parent states that the
The use of quotation marks lets other readers know that child is inconsolable, the diagnosis of meningitis should
the information within the marks is not your paraphrase come to mind. Your documentation should reflect that you
or restatement of something the patient told you but considered this diagnosis; therefore, it should include the
the actual words from the patient. Notice that the word presence or absence of symptoms that are associated with
“hypertension” was substituted for “blood pressure.” It meningitis. Lethargy is one such symptom; therefore, if
is acceptable to do this because the patient is stating a the child is attentive and looking around the room and
fact and you are translating the lay term into an accepted interactive with his environment, these are pertinent
and more specific medical term that will have consistent negatives in the child’s history that lead you away from
meaning to others who will read the note. the diagnosis of meningitis or make it less likely.
One of the most challenging aspects of documenting
the subjective information is determining what elements Analyzing Documentation
of the history are pertinent to the presenting complaint. There are at least two ways to develop documentation
It takes years of practicing medicine to understand the skills: (1) practice, practice, and practice, and (2) crit-
importance of certain associated signs and symptoms ically analyze documentation. This text gives you the
and how they relate to the CC. Many conditions have opportunity to do both. Read the subjective information
a certain pattern of presentation. A man having a myo- documented in the following two examples, and then
cardial infarction is likely to present with chest pain or answer the questions.
pressure, sometimes radiating to the neck, jaw, or arm;
nausea, dyspnea, and diaphoresis are often part of the EXAMPLE 3.1
symptom complex of infarction. Not only should you
ask about all these signs and symptoms as you gather CC: “my left knee hur ts”
the medical history, but also you should document the S: This 42-year-old man presents with complaint of left
absence or presence of each of these signs and symptoms. knee pain. He injured his knee while playing softball. His
Some findings from the history will support or suggest pain has gradually worsened over the past week. He
one diagnosis more than another. These findings are has not noticed any swelling. He denies any numbness
“pertinent positives” because their presence is pertinent below the knee. He has not had any prior knee surger y.
to the specific problem. The absence of other findings, He is allergic to penicillin. He denies tobacco use. He
called “pertinent negatives,” likewise may suggest a cer- works full-time in computer sales.
tain diagnosis and help rule out other diagnoses because Based on the information in this note, answer the
of their absence. Consider the history of a 22-year-old following questions:
man who presents with low-grade fever and right lower
1. How long has the patient had left knee pain?
quadrant abdominal pain. The DDX of acute appendi-
2. Has he tried anything to relieve the pain?
citis should come to mind. Patients with this condition
3. What per tinent positives and negatives are docu-
typically present with anorexia, or loss of appetite. If this
mented? Are there any other per tinent elements
man has anorexia, that is a pertinent positive finding and
of the patient’s histor y that should have been
would support the DDX of appendicitis. If he states
documented?
that he is hungry and wants to know how soon he can
4. Does the patient have any chronic medical
eat, the absence of anorexia is a pertinent negative, and,
conditions?
although it does not rule out appendicitis, it makes that
5. Has the patient had any surger y?
condition less likely. When documenting certain elements
6. Does the patient take any medications?
of the history, such as associated signs and symptoms, it
is helpful to list all pertinent positives together and then
to list the pertinent negatives. Pattern recognition is one As you can see, this entry did not allow you to answer
way that you can make a diagnosis. Documenting the these questions. However, all of the information should
pertinent positives and negatives in the patient’s history be part of the history related to the patient’s CC of knee
often will help other health-care providers recognize the pain and should be documented as subjective information.
pattern of the condition the patient is exhibiting. This information is important to anyone who may be
Your documentation of pertinent positives and nega- involved in the patient’s care. Read Example 3.2, and
tives should be detailed enough to narrow the DDX and then answer these same questions.
EXAMPLE 3.2
Objective
CC: “my left knee hur ts”
S: This 42-year-old man presents with complaint of left The elements of the comprehensive H&P that are
knee pain. He originally injured his left knee about a identified as objective information are as follows:
month ago while playing softball. He states that he slid
• Vital signs (VS)
into a base and his foot caught against the bag, which
• A general assessment of the patient
twisted his knee. In the past week, the pain has gradu-
• Physical examination findings
ally worsened. He describes the pain as “a deep ache.”
• Results from laboratory or diagnostic studies
He has not noted any swelling of the knee. The pain is
worse when he stands for more than half an hour at a Objective information is what you or others can
time and when he walks and goes up stairs. The patient observe. Typically, you would document it in the
has taken ibuprofen 400 mg occasionally for the pain, order listed previously. You may document VS on a
with some relief. He denies any numbness or tingling of flow sheet or some other place in the chart, especially
the extremity or previous injur y to the knee. He does if the patient is hospitalized. If the VS are recorded
not have any chronic medical problems and specifically elsewhere, it is a good idea to record them again in
denies having a histor y of hyper tension or ulcers. He has the Objective section. Recording the specific readings
never had surger y. He does not take any medications on of the vital signs is preferred over “VS stable” or “VS
a regular basis. He is allergic to penicillin, which causes within normal limits (WNL).” It is easier and more
a rash. He is married, has two children, and is employed convenient for others who will read the note to see the
full-time in computer sales. He denies any tobacco use, actual numbers, and this allows them to make their own
drinks “a few beers a week,” and denies drug use. interpretation of the VS.
A general assessment is not always included in a
The note in Example 3.2 is longer than the one in note in an office-based encounter but is very helpful in
Example 3.1. It is also more thorough and helps answer certain settings or with certain more serious or urgent
the questions a reader was not able to answer after reading CCs. Document a general assessment in a way that
the note in Example 3.1. The note in E xample 3.2 does helps identify the patient and paints a picture of the
a better job of documenting the required elements of patient’s overall presentation and status. Identifying
the HPI as well as pertinent positives and negatives. information typically documented includes the patient’s
Notice also the use of quotation marks (“my left knee age and gender and sometimes the patient’s race. Con-
hurts” and “a few beers a week”) that indicates verbatim sider two patients who present to an urgent care center
responses from the patient. There will be times when with shortness of breath. The general assessment for
you want to include the patient’s exact words in your the first patient is documented as “a 28-year-old man
documentation; ideally, you should ask follow-up who is cyanotic, using accessory muscles and gasping
questions in order to determine exactly how often the for breath.” General assessment of the second patient is
patient consumes alcohol and how much he consumes. documented as “a 28-year-old man sitting comfortably
This would give you a better idea of whether the patient who is acyanotic and has no tachypnea or increased
has any health risks associated with alcohol use. respiratory effort and is able to speak in complete
sentences.” The approach to these two patients will be
different based on the observations made about each
patient. Although most providers automatically make
MEDICOLEGAL ALERT ! this assessment mentally, it is good practice to document
it specifically, especially in settings where patients are
When a condition or symptom involves any part of the
seen based on the acuity of their condition and not the
body that involves laterality, specify the area of concern
order in which they arrive.
and do so consistently. In Example 3.2, the patient com-
Just as it is challenging to know how much history
plained of left knee pain. Verify that you document left
to obtain and document in the Subjective portion, it
knee when you are referring to history and report left
also may be a challenge to obtain and document the
knee findings from the physical examination. Most con-
physical examination and other objective information.
ditions involving an extremity warrant examination of
The objective information should flow logically from
and comparison to the contralateral extremity. Even one
the subjective and should reflect your DDX just as
discrepancy in use of left or right could raise doubts as
the subjective does. Physical examination is usually
to which side is being examined or treated. Malpractice
taught in a system-based manner, and this may help
lawyers will look for such discrepancies and will be sure
you to know how much examination to do, which
to point them out, which might damage your credibility.
systems to examine, and how much examination to
document. Some CCs will be associated with a specific positive and negative findings from the physical
system; back pain, for instance, is associated with the examination. The history of a patient who presents
musculoskeletal system, so the physical examination with a sore throat includes the pertinent positives
would focus on the musculoskeletal system. Because of sudden onset, fever, pain with swallowing, and a
the musculoskeletal and the neurological systems are muffled voice, prompting the DDX of streptococcal
interrelated and either could be the source of the back pharyngitis. On physical examination, you would
pain, you also would perform and document a neuro- expect to see tonsillar enlargement, erythema of the
logical examination. Use the DDX of a complaint to tonsils and pharynx, and possibly exudates. Presence
help determine which systems are examined. A 34-year- of any of these findings is considered a pertinent
old woman presenting with abdominal pain has a positive and makes the diagnosis of streptococcal
DDX that includes appendicitis, cholecystitis, ovarian pharyngitis more likely than if the findings were not
cyst, sexually transmitted disease, ectopic pregnancy, there. The absence of any of these findings would be
and so on. Your documentation should indicate that a pertinent negative.
both the gastrointestinal (GI) and the gynecological
(GYN) systems were examined. If DDX arising from Formats for Documenting Objective
systems other than GI and GYN are considered, then Information
you also should examine the associated system(s) or Two formats are commonly used for documenting
body area(s). the Objective portion of a SOAP note. Example 3.3
Typically, you would perform the physical exam- shows the narrative format, and Example 3.4 shows the
ination in a head-to-toe format. You can modify this system-heading format. Either format is acceptable;
approach as needed, omitting systems that do not which one is used is determined by the facility and may
need to be examined in a problem-focused encounter be influenced by the method of documenting, whether
or saving the examination of a system for last because paper-based or computer-based. Some health-care
of discomfort for the patient. Regardless of the order providers prefer the system-heading format because
in which the examination is performed, you should the use of headings makes it easier to find specific
document it in head-to-toe order. The suggested order information. Instead of reading the entire Objective
of documenting a physical examination is shown in section, a reader can go quickly and easily to the system
Table 3-1. You should be aware that there are vari- related to the CC. If using the system-heading format,
ations of this format. Some providers will document omit the heading for any system not examined. It is not
the respiratory and cardiac examinations under the necessary to include the heading and then document
heading CHEST. Some will document pulses under “not examined” or “not pertinent.”
the heading of EXTREMITIES rather than in the
cardiovascular system. These are acceptable variations. EXAMPLE 3.3 NARRATIVE FORMAT
The content of the documentation is usually far more
important than the format. The patient is a 42-year-old man who is aler t and coop-
Just as there are pertinent positive and negative find- erative. His temperature is 98.2, respirations 20, pulse
ings from the history, typically there will be pertinent is 88, and BP is 126/64. The head is normocephalic and
atraumatic. The pupils are equal, round, and react to
light. The neck is supple without any masses. The spine
Table 3-1 Order in Which to Document
is straight without any tenderness over the ver tebral
Objective Information for SOAP
bodies. The upper extremities show full ROM of all
Note
joints. Left leg is without any swelling or deformity.
• Vital signs: temperature, respiration, blood pressure, There is tenderness to palpation at the medial aspect
height, weight, body mass index (BMI) of the left knee; no obvious dislocation of the patella.
• General assessment The anterior drawer sign is negative. There is full ROM
• Skin of the left hip and knee without crepitance. McMurray
• Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat (HEENT) test is positive at the left medial aspect. The right leg is
• Neck without any swelling or deformity. There is no tender-
• Chest ness to palpation. Full ROM of the right hip and knee.
• Abdomen Negative anterior drawer sign and negative McMurray.
• Genitourinary or gynecological Muscle strength 5/5 bilaterally. Cranial ner ves II to XII
• Extremities are grossly intact, and there are no focal neurological
• Musculoskeletal deficits. Straight leg raise is negative bilaterally. Patellar
• Neurological and ankle reflexes are 2+ bilaterally.
EXAMPLE 3.4 SYSTEMS-HEADINGS FORMAT having the test result specifically documented because
General: The patient is a 42-year-old man who is
this will give them the opportunity to make their own
aler t and cooperative. His temperature is 98.2,
interpretation of the results and save the time of having
r espirations 20, pulse is 88, and BP is 126/64.
to look up results that may be documented elsewhere
HEENT: The head is normocephalic and atraumatic.
in the medical record.
The pupils are equal, round, and react to light.
If you plan to order diagnostic tests but do not have
Neck: The neck is supple without any masses.
the results at the time you are documenting, this is
Musculoskeletal: The spine is straight without any
usually documented as part of the plan instead of an
tenderness over the ver tebral bodies. The u pper
objective finding. This is because there are no results to
extremities show full ROM of all joints. Left leg
observe or document yet. Consider the 42-year-old man
is without any swelling or deformity. There is
presented in Example 3.2 who presents with left knee
t enderness to palpation at the medial aspect of
pain. After gathering the problem-specific history, or
the left knee; no obvious dislocation of the patella.
subjective information, you perform the problem-specific
The anterior drawer sign is negative. There is full
physical examination (objective information). You
ROM of the left hip and knee without crepitance.
decide to order an x-ray of the knee. If you cannot
McMurray test is positive at the left medial aspect.
perform the x-ray on site, the patient will have to go
The right leg is without any swelling or d eformity.
to an outpatient facility. Dr. al Zahid, the radiologist
There is no tenderness to palpation. Full ROM of
at the facility, typically telephones with the results of
the right hip and knee. Negative anterior drawer
the x-ray, so you ask the patient to return to your office
sign and negative McMurray. Muscle strength 5/5
after the x-ray is taken. When you get the results, you
bilaterally.
document “x-ray of the left knee is negative for any
Neurological: Cranial ner ves II to XII are grossly
fracture or other acute findings per Dr. al Zahid.” If
intact, and there are no focal neurological deficits.
you perform the x-ray on site, or if the patient returns
Straight leg raise is negative bilaterally. Patellar and
with the x-rays taken at another facility, you would view
ankle reflexes are 2+ bilaterally.
the films and document the interpretation as your own
(e.g., “I personally reviewed the x-rays of the left knee
and do not see any fracture or other acute findings”).
Documenting Diagnostic Test Results
You should document the results of laboratory or other Interventions Done During the Visit
diagnostic tests in the Objective portion of a SOAP You should document any interventions done during
note. Tests that may be ordered for a 34-year-old woman the visit in the Objective section. Suppose the patient
who presents with abdominal pain include a complete described in Example 3.2 is seen at 5:30 p.m. You cannot
blood count (CBC), basic metabolic panel (BMP), take x-rays on site, and the outpatient facility where he
urinalysis (UA), urine pregnancy test, and abdominal would have an x-ray done is closed. In the meantime,
ultrasound. The results of these studies would generally you provide a knee immobilizer and instruct the patient
follow the documentation of the physical examination. on crutch walking. Document these interventions in the
Give the name of the test first, then the result (e.g., Objective section of the note. Obtaining an x-ray is part
CBC shows a white blood cell (WBC) of 5.8, hemoglobin of your plan, which is discussed later in this chapter. If
(Hgb) of 11, and hematocrit (Hct) of 34). If all the the patient were instructed to return tomorrow after
results are within normal limits, you may document x-rays are taken, that would also be part of the plan.
as “the CBC is WNL.” If one component of a panel Use Application Exercise 3.1 to test your skills in
of tests is abnormal, but the rest are normal, you could differentiating between content that belongs in the
document “BMP shows a potassium of 5.2; otherwise, Subjective part of a note and information that belongs
the results are WNL.” Other readers will appreciate in the Objective part of the note.
List at least three specific components that should be examined in each of these two systems.
Adhering to the recommended head-to-toe order of Exercise 3.3 the order in which each finding should
documenting the physical examination in the Objec- be documented.
tive portion of a SOAP note, indicate in Application
The first assessment listed should usually correlate with Differential Diagnosis
the presenting complaint. As you uncover other diagnoses, When you cannot determine a definitive diagnosis,
list them in order of importance or impact on the CC. then document a list of DDX, reflecting conditions
Remember to list any comorbidities that may influence that are being considered and that may require further
the patient’s medical course. Refer to Example 3.6. workup. It is beyond the scope of this text to address
the process of developing and refining DDX. Although
EXAMPLE 3.6 generating a list of DDX is a basic skill that you can
S: This patient complains of experiencing an aching, learn with practice, it takes extensive clinical training
occasionally sharp pain in the right lower leg over the and a wealth of clinical experience to develop the
past 2 days. He noticed an open sore on the right leg higher-order critical thinking skills needed to synthe-
this morning. He has felt feverish and slightly nauseated size and analyze data in order to refine and continually
since last night. He rates the pain severity as 5/10 at narrow the DDX and arrive at a logical most likely
rest; standing worsens the pain to 8/10. He has not had or definitive diagnosis. There is certainly truth in the
any relief with Tylenol or elevation of leg. Measurement axiom, “if it is never considered, it will never be diag-
of the fasting blood sugars range from 200 to 275, and nosed”; therefore, you must be able to generate DDX
2-hour postprandial blood sugars range from 250 to for every problem with which a patient presents. It is
325. Last HgbA1C done 3 months ago and was 8.3. one thing to know that a patient has a herniated disk
PMH: Significant for type 2 diabetes and HTN. with radicular symptoms and then to consult a medical
Medications: Metformin 1,000 mg BID; Glyburide 5 mg textbook about the particulars of that condition. It is
BID; Lisinopril 20 mg daily. another thing altogether to have a patient in front of
Allergies: NKDA you who presents with back pain or numbness in the
Social: 30-pack-year history of cigarette smoking; quit leg and to have to go through the process of investi-
2 years ago. Denies alcohol or drug use. gating a symptom and arriving at a certain diagnosis.
O: General assessment: 68-year-old man who is alert That process is a complex and multifaceted one, and
and oriented but looks mildly distressed. this text makes no attempt to teach clinical reasoning
VS: BP 156/94; P 94; R 20; and T 97.0. Wt 235, Ht 70” or medical decision-making but aims to present only
Heart: RRR without murmur. a brief discussion of the importance of documentation
Lungs: Adventitious breath sounds throughout all lung fields. that reflects the subjective and objective data that you
Extremities:There is a 2-cm superficial ulceration on the gathered about a symptom or specific problem, doc-
right lower leg proximal to the lateral malleolus with umenting an assessment or assessments that reflect
4-cm area of surrounding erythema and increased analysis of such data and support a plan of care. It may
warmth. Dorsalis pedis pulses are 1+ and equal.There be helpful for you as a student or novice health-care
is decreased sensation from the midcalf to the toes provider to consult symptom-based books as a starting
bilaterally. point to developing DDX (see the Bibliography for
A: Ulcer right lower leg S81.801 specific references).
Cellulitis right lower leg L03.115 When documenting the DDX, list in order of most
Type 2 diabetes, poorly controlled E11.65 likely to least likely. The list does not need to be all-
Diabetic neuropathy E11.40 inclusive but should demonstrate thoughtful analysis
Essential hyper tension I10 of the available data. This allows other readers to follow
your reasoning and should demonstrate when addi-
tional workup is warranted. In some practice settings,
MEDICOLEGAL ALERT ! laboratory and imaging services are readily available;
having the results of diagnostic studies at the time of
Be careful that you do not document or code a diag-
the encounter may establish a definitive diagnosis.
nosis until it has been proven definitively. Documenting
When these services are not available, documentation
an unproven diagnosis may adversely affect the patient’s
of the plan should reflect which studies are needed and
present and future health care. It could also result in in-
how the results will guide you to formulate a treatment
appropriate coding.
plan or management strategy for the patient. Example
3.7 illustrates documenting the assessment when a
definitive diagnosis has not been reached and includes
The ulcer and cellulitis of the right lower extremity the DDX. Note that an ICD-10 code is listed only for
represent the presenting complaint, whereas the poorly the presenting symptom, and no codes are listed for the
controlled type 2 diabetes, neuropathy, and hypertension DDX. This is to prevent a diagnosis being inadvertently
are comorbid conditions that may affect his overall added to a patient’s record or submitting billing for a
medical course and outcome. diagnosis that has not yet been proven.
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
a surgeon to be evaluated for possible appendicitis. Often control over their health and its determinants, and
you will refer pregnant women to an obstetrics-gynecology thereby improve their health.” Health promotion
(OB/GYN) specialist for obstetric management. You and disease prevention programs often address social
could refer a pediatric patient with speech difficulties to determinants of health, which influence modifiable
a speech therapist for evaluation and management. You risk behaviors. Modifiable risk behaviors include, for
may refer a patient to a physical therapist for evaluation example, tobacco use, poor eating habits, and lack of
and treatment of injuries and musculoskeletal problems. physical activity, which contribute to the development of
Many insurance companies require an authorization for chronic disease. Disease prevention focuses on strategies
such consults. A copy of the medical record pertaining to reduce the risk of developing chronic diseases and
to the complaint is frequently reviewed to establish the other morbidities. Another aspect of disease prevention
“medical necessity” of the consultation. Thorough doc- is through routine screening tests. Documentation of
umentation is critical in justifying the need for service. immunization status is an important part of disease
prevention. Specific aspects of health promotion and
Therapeutic Modalities disease prevention are addressed for pregnant women,
Pharmacological Treatment pediatrics and adolescents, adults, and older adults in
Chapters 4 through 7, respectively.
Frequently you will prescribe medications for patients
to treat illnesses, conditions, or symptoms. You must Patient Education
document specific details of the prescribed medication,
Education is such an important aspect of health pro-
such as name, dose, route of administration, frequency of
motion and disease prevention that it deserves special
administration, and duration. Prescription writing is covered
mention. When a patient has a positive encounter with
in Chapter 9. If you recommend an over-the-counter
a health-care provider, it is often because the provider
(OTC) medication, then you would document the same
took time to explain the diagnosis and treatment
details listed earlier for prescription medications. When
plan. Most patients want to know what is causing
prescribing or recommending a medication for use as
their symptoms, what their treatment options are, the
needed (PRN), your documentation should indicate
expected outcome, and why or when to return to the
what condition or symptom the medication is intended
office. When you prescribe or recommend medication,
for, for example, diphenhydramine 25 mg 1–2 tablets
you should inform the patient about the benefits and
every 6 hours PRN itching.
risks and potential side effects. Educating patients about
Documentation also should address any change in
their condition or disease enables them to take control
current medications, such as adjusting the dosage or
of their health. Patient satisfaction surveys report that
frequency or discontinuing a medication. For example,
patient education is considered an important indicator
Mrs. Aguilar has been taking amoxicillin for sinusitis
of the quality of care received. Encourage your patients
for the past 5 days and is not improving. When issuing
to be active participants in their own health care, which
a new prescription for cephalexin, also document that
often improves compliance with treatment.
she was instructed to discontinue the amoxicillin.
company that makes insulin will offer handouts related or you may instruct the patient to go to an urgent care
to care of a diabetic patient, such as dietary information, center or emergency department if a serious problem
logbooks for patients to record blood glucose readings, develops.
and other educational materials for patients and their You can determine the time frame for routine
families. Documenting which handouts and materials follow-up by how soon you would expect a patient to
you give the patient may prompt you to inquire about exhibit a response to the treatment initiated. If a patient
the patient’s understanding of the material at a sub- has been taking antibiotics for otitis media, you would
sequent visit. Simply providing written material to expect the patient to improve within 48 to 72 hours;
the patient does not meet your obligation to provide therefore, documentation would include “follow up
education. You should determine the patient’s ability if not improved in 2 to 3 days.” Consider potential
to read and understand the material before distributing complications that could occur; in the case of otitis
written materials. Figure 3-2 is an example of a patient media, meningitis is a rare but serious complication.
education handout. Document the specific symptoms that indicate the
need for evaluation, such as persistent fever, headache,
Follow-Up Instructions vomiting, or neck stiffness. This is especially important
It is important to document follow-up instructions at for pediatric patients and in situations in which the
every patient visit, regardless of the reason for the visit. patient’s condition could deteriorate rapidly. Failure to
Specific information that you should document includes document your instructions to the patient is considered
when the patient should return for follow-up, signs or failure to provide those instructions.
symptoms that could indicate worsening of the patient’s Follow-up visits are an opportune time to ask patients
condition, and what to do if those signs or symptoms whether they have any questions about what was discussed
develop. You may advise the patient to call your office at previous visits. Encouragement and reinforcement
for further instructions. You may determine that the will promote patient understanding of the condition and
patient should return to the office for re-evaluation, compliance with treatment, which, in turn, may lead to
• Consider purchasing a “noisemaker” to block out background noise. It plays soothing sounds of “white noise” or raindrops, ocean
waves, etc.
• Limit naps to 10 or 15 minutes during the day. Short naps can be beneficial.
• Listen to tapes of relaxing music or soothing natural sounds if you have trouble falling asleep.
• Jot down problems and set aside a time the next day to focus on them.
• Eliminate intrusive sound and light from your bedroom so you won’t be awakened accidentally.
• Do not smoke after 7 p.m., or quit smoking altogether. Nicotine has the same effect as caffeine on sleep.
• Use alcohol lightly. Alcohol can fragment sleep, especially the second half of your sleeping period.
• Avoid heavy meals and heavy spices in the evening. If you have regurgitation problems, raising the head of the bed should help.
• Develop a bedtime ritual. Bedtime reading, unrelated to work, may help relax you.
• If you wake in the night, don’t try too hard to fall asleep; rather, focus on the pleasant sensations of relaxation.
• Quality of sleep is important. Too much time in bed can decrease the quality of the next night’s sleep.
• Limit the bedroom to sleep and relaxation. Don’t use it as a work area.
a more favorable outcome. Numerous studies indicate documentation of pertinent positives and pertinent
that communication between clinician and patient is negatives helps to demonstrate a pattern. Obtaining
the single most effective predictor of patient adherence and documenting subjective information is often
to a treatment plan. If you use effective communication the most time-consuming part of the encounter but
skills, the patient will become an educated participant often will lead to the diagnosis. The subjective infor-
in the treatment, thereby increasing the likelihood of mation guides what physical examination should be
compliance. The concept of effective clinician-patient done. When documenting the objective information,
communication is a necessity, not an option. painting a picture of the patient’s presentation by
Figure 3-3 shows a complete office note in an EMR documenting a general assessment helps to provide
from the HPI through the physical examination of each context for the encounter. Taken together, the subjec-
body system to the assessment and plan. tive and objective information should lead to logical
assessments, impressions, or differential diagnoses.
Once the final assessment is determined, the plan
Summary documents what actions you will take to treat the
patient’s condition. To reinforce the content of this
SOAP notes provide a format to document problem-focused chapter, please complete the worksheets that follow.
encounters when a comprehensive H&P is not needed. Worksheets 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 include SOAP notes for
The SOAP note is adaptable to different practice set- encounters in different practice settings, written by
tings. It takes years of clinical practice to develop the various providers. Compare and contrast these notes
judgment necessary to determine how much history and how they are adapted for the chief complaint
to obtain and how much physical examination to and setting of care. And be sure to review Appendix
complete and document. Consider that much of the A, the Document Library, for full case examples of
process of making a diagnosis is pattern recognition; patient documentation.
Name
1. List the seven cardinal aspects of the history of present illness that should be documented in the Subjec-
tive information.
3. What information about the patient’s social history would be important to document?
4. A patient presents with a chief complaint of back pain. Listed here are several statements from the HPI
for a chief complaint of back pain. Number them in the order that they should appear in the Subjective
paragraph.
_____ Pertinent negative associated symptom: The patient denies any trauma.
_____ Aggravating factor: The pain is worse after standing or walking for more than 20 minutes.
_____ Onset: The pain started 3 days ago after moving some heavy furniture.
_____ Pertinent positive associated symptom: The patient has had a tingling sensation in the right
buttock area.
_____ Severity: The pain is described as a dull ache and is rated as a 4/10.
5. Which of the following would be documented as subjective information? Underline all that apply.
vital signs history obtained from spouse medications
x-ray report family history CBC results
physical examination findings review of systems onset of chief complaint
Name
1. Based on the subjective and objective information, what assessment or differential diagnoses come to
mind?
2. What tests, if any, would you order? How might the results affect your DDX?
3. Write a plan for this patient including all of the components discussed in the text.
Name
1. Which of the following would be documented in the Plan portion? Underline all that apply.
physical examination findings
information from medical records
patient education
CBC results
R/O ankle fracture
laboratory and x-ray orders
vital signs
recommended OTC medications
follow-up instructions
review of systems
referrals
2. Number the following sentences in the suggested order they should appear in the Plan portion.
_____Discussed the DDX with patient.
_____Follow-up in 2 weeks.
_____CT of chest if symptoms not resolved within 2 weeks.
_____Refer to respiratory for pulmonary function testing.
_____Go to the ED if shortness of breath worsens despite albuterol.
_____Handout on monitoring peak expiratory flow readings given and explained.
_____Albuterol inhaler 1–2 puffs every 4–6 hours PRN wheezing.
Name
S:
HPI: Pt is a 41-year-old who presents with a 1-day hx of nausea. Nausea began yesterday morning, and she began
vomiting in the afternoon. Since onset of vomiting, she is unable to keep down solid food or liquids. She initially
vomited 2–3 times per hour and then less frequently. Pt denies diarrhea or constipation. Pt denies recent travel
or camping trip. Pt states a coworker was sick last week with an unknown illness.
O: General: A&O x 3, in moderate distress, lying on exam table with emesis basin
-DVRQ:LOVRQ3$6,,
1. Analyze the Subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the
documentation.
Author ISBN # Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
UF03_01 6662_C_UF03_01.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. B/W X 4/C 2/C PMS 65
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
41p0 x 28p1 Initials
3. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
4. Did you consider differential diagnoses other than the ones documented? If so, list.
5. What condition/symptom/diagnosis would be most appropriate to document for this visit? Can you find
an ICD-10 code for it?
7. Did you consider other interventions that could be included in the plan? If so, list.
Name
S:
CC: “My lips and tongue swelled up and I thought I was going to die.”
HPI: Pt states that 6 hours ago he had sudden onset of swelling in his lips and tongue. He had a hard time breathing.
His wife urged him to take some Benadryl and he took one 25 mg tablet. After approximately 1 hour, the
swelling began to resolve, and the difficulty breathing also resolved. At this time, he is not experiencing any
difficulty breathing, and he feels that the swelling is almost completely gone. He specifically denies any chest
pain or heart racing associated with this episode. He did not notice any itching of the skin or hives. He had one
similar episode many years ago after eating shrimp, and has avoided all shellfish since that time. He is certain
that he has not ingested shellfish in the past 48 hours.
PMH: HTN for at least 10 years. He was in good control on HCTZ only until recently. He saw his primary care provider
earlier this week and was given a prescription for a new medication. The prescription is labeled as lisinopril 10
mg. He has taken four doses of lisinopril but never developed any symptoms until today. No hx of asthma or
urticaria. Denies any immune disorders. Has never had any surgery.
Medications: HCTZ 12.5 mg once daily for “many years.” Lisinopril 10 mg daily started in the past 4 days.
Allergies: No drug allergies that he is aware of. States an allergy to shellfish, which caused swelling of the lips
and a rash.
FAMILY Hx: No hx of angioedema. Mother had HTN; deceased at age 72 from CVA. Otherwise noncontributory.
SOCIAL Hx: Denies tobacco use. He drinks 3–4 beers per week. Denies drug use.
O: General: Pleasant 47-year-old male sitting in chair talking comfortably. No respiratory difficulty or cyanosis. Does not appear
anxious at this time.
Vital Signs: BP 138/86; P 98; R 22; T 98.9; pulse oximetry 98% on room air.
HEENT: Head normocephalic. No noticeable swelling of lips. Oropharynx without erythema. No swelling of the tongue or uvula.
Chest: Heart RRR. No murmurs. Breath sounds clear in all fields without wheezing. Good air movement throughout without
increased effort of breathing.
-DFTXHOLQH0LWFKHOO0'
2. Analyze the Objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the
documentation.
3. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
4. Did you consider differential diagnoses other than the ones documented? If so, list.
5. What condition/symptom/diagnosis would be most appropriate to document for this visit? Can you find
an ICD-10 code for it?
7. Did you consider other interventions that could be included in the plan? If so, list.
Name
1. Analyze the Subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the
documentation.
2. Analyze the Objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the
documentation.
3. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
4. Did you consider differential diagnoses other than the ones documented? If so, list.
5. What condition/symptom/diagnosis would be most appropriate to document for this visit? Can you find
an ICD-10 code for it?
7. Did you consider other interventions that could be included in the plan? If so, list.
HPI: CF complains of LLQ abdominal pain that began 3 days ago. She describes the pain as “crampy” and
intermittent, although she says the pain never entirely goes away but waxes and wanes. At the onset, the pain was 2/10;
however, it has progressively worsened every day, and she now rates the pain as an 8/10. The pain does not radiate but
stays in the LLQ. The pain does not seem to be related to food intake. She has not identified any aggravating factors. She
did take some Tums yesterday, 2 tablets, but did not experience any relief or change in the pain. She has felt warm and
has had chills, but has not actually taken her temperature. She has had some nausea that started yesterday, but has not
vomited. Pt has had chronic constipation for “at least 10 years” and says that she normally takes a laxative 2–3 times a
week to stimulate bowel movements; in the past 24 hours, she has had 4–5 loose stools. She specifically denies any blood
in the stool.
PMH: No hx of GI problems in the past other than the chronic constipation, no colitis, ulcers, malabsorption problems. No
abdominal surgery; only surgical history is a breast biopsy 5 years ago that was negative. No previous episodes of similar
symptoms. Menopausal for about 12 years.
Medications: Ex-lax 2–3 times weekly for “at least 10 years.” Takes a multivitamin once daily. No regular
prescription meds.
SOCIAL: Denies tobacco use; occasional cocktail “on special occasions” but does not consume alcohol on a regular
basis. Married, cares for husband who has dementia.
O: General: 64-year-old obese black woman sitting on table. Alert and conversant; febrile, looks mildly ill but NAD.
Good historian.
Heart: RRR
Abd: Soft, obese, nondistended. No surgical scars. Tenderness to palpation localized to LLQ. No guarding or
rebound. No masses or organomegaly. Bowel sounds present throughout. No tympany to percussion.
Rectal: Soft dark stool in rectal vault. No masses. Stool negative for occult blood.
Flat and upright abdominal plain films do not show any air fluid levels and no free air in the peritoneum, per my
interpretation. Blood work pending.
P: 1. CBC, CMP, UA
2. Stop Ex-lax for now.
3. Discussed further workup; pt unable to stay overnight in hospital as she is sole caretaker for husband. Since patient is not
vomiting, will manage as outpatient but discussed with pt the potential complications of ruptured diverticula, possible
widespread infection requiring surgery, and need for her to contact me immediately if she worsens at all. If condition
worsens, will likely need hospitalization with urgent CT scan of abdomen, surgical consult.
4. Metronidazole 500 mg PO BID x 14 days + ciprofloxacin extended release 500 mg by mouth once daily for 14 days.
Pt educated on reason for double-antibiotic therapy.
5. Acetaminophen 500 to 1,000 mg every 4 hours prn pain or fever. Pt offered narcotic analgesic but declined.
6. Promethazine 25 mg tablet PO every 6 hours prn N/V; advised on possible drowsiness, should not drive or operate
machinery while taking.
7. Return for follow-up in 48 hours. If any increased pain or vomiting and unable to keep down antibiotics, call office immediately.
8. Clear liquid diet until nausea and pain resolve, then slowly advance diet.
9. Will need routine colonoscopy when asymptomatic because she has not had one in approx. 10 years.
10. Patient given handout on diverticular disease, questions answered.
0DOLD<D]]L3$&
Name
1. Did you decide not to include in your documentation any of the subjective information that was given?
Why or why not?
3. Do you feel additional objective information should be documented that was not provided? If so, list.
4. Are you able to establish a definitive diagnosis for M. J. at this encounter? Why or why not?
5. List any assessments you included in your documentation and ICD-10 codes for any that would be billed
as part of this visit.
6. How many elements of the plan, described previously under the Plan section, are included in your
documentation?
Writing a SOAP note is sometimes difficult for students or health-care providers with limited experience,
especially formulating the plan of care. If you found it challenging, compare your SOAP note with others and
seek feedback from faculty or other experienced providers.
Name
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 3. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the context
in this chapter.
BMP CBC
CC DDX
EMR FH
GI GYN
H&P HPI
Hct MRI
Hgb OTC
ICD-10 PRN
OB/GYN RLQ
PMH ROS
RICE SOAP
SH UTI
UA WBC
VS WNL
Chapter 4
Documenting Prenatal Care
and Perinatal Events
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• Identify components of the history, physical examination, and laboratory screening tests that are done
at the first prenatal visit.
• List components of a detailed maternal history.
• Identify elements of the physical examination that are performed at the initial prenatal visit.
• List common laboratory and diagnostic tests done during pregnancy.
• Identify common topics that should be included in patient education throughout pregnancy.
• List components of a delivery note and postpartum note.
• List components of a newborn physical examination.
• Identify elements of the Apgar and New Ballard scores.
79
Documentation of first day of the last menstrual period (LMP), and then
calculate the preliminary estimated due date (EDD;
Prenatal Care also, estimated date of confinement, or EDC). It is
important to determine the correct EDD because it
Demographic Information will guide the remainder of the patient’s prenatal care.
Basic demographic information includes the patient’s Obstetric history should include gravidity (sometimes
age, marital status, relationship between the father of referred to as gravida and documented as G) and parity
the baby and the patient, occupation, self-identified (sometimes referred to as para and documented as P).
ethnicity, religious preference, educational background, Gravidity indicates the number of times a woman has
and contact information. Demographic information can been pregnant, regardless of the pregnancy outcome.
be important in evaluating risk (e.g., available support Each pregnancy is counted only one time, even if the
systems, living arrangements), guiding educational plans pregnancy was a multiple gestation, such as twins or
(e.g., educational level and preferred language), and triplets. A current pregnancy, if any, is included in
identifying potential cultural or religious restrictions that this count. Parity reflects the total number of births
may affect care during the pregnancy (e.g., unwilling to after 20 weeks, regardless of the number of fetuses
accept blood transfusions). Payer information is often or outcomes. Abortus means pregnancy loss for any
documented as well. reason, including abortion and miscarriage. Another
way to document a more complete description of
Maternal History pregnancy outcomes is to record the number of term
During the initial prenatal visit, you will collect most deliveries, preterm deliveries (prior to 37 weeks),
of the information that you will use to evaluate ob- abortions, and live births (remembered by using the
stetric risks and determine what special interventions, acronym TPAL). Table 4-1 describes what specific
if any, might be needed at delivery. Risk assessment information should be elicited in each history section.
is accomplished primarily by obtaining a detailed The initial prenatal visit also should include maternal
maternal history, by performing a comprehensive and paternal screening for disorders that have a genetic
physical examination, and by performing screening tendency, including thalassemia, neural tube defect,
laboratory tests with the goal of identifying risk fac- congenital heart defect, Down syndrome, Tay-Sachs,
tors to prevent an adverse outcome to the pregnancy. Canavan disease, cystic fibrosis, Huntington chorea,
Specific maternal history that you should document sickle cell disease or trait, mental retardation, autism,
includes menstrual history, previous obstetric history, recurrent pregnancy loss or stillbirth, hemophilia, and
past medical and surgical history, and infection history. muscular dystrophy as well as any birth defects other
For menstrual history, document whether the patient than those listed.
has regular or irregular menses as well as the number Based on your reading, complete the application
of days in the patient’s menstrual cycle. Document the exercise that follows.
the head is below the ischial spines. Points are given Down syndrome and 97% with trisomy 18. The FTS
from 0 to a maximum of 3 points for a station of 1+ measures blood levels of free beta-human chorionic
or 2+. Position refers to the positioning of the cervix. gonadotropin (hCG) and pregnancy associated plasma
If the cervix faces front (anterior), it is more favorable, protein A (PAPP-A) at around 9 to 14 weeks. In addition,
whereas posterior is less favorable. Consistency of the an ultrasound is performed around 11 to 14 weeks to
cervix is measured on a scale of firmness from firm assess the nuchal translucency. Women should be offered
to soft. The softer the cervix, the better the chance of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (ms-AFP) screening
vaginal delivery. Table 4-2 shows the components of between 15 and 22 weeks to assess for neural tube defects.
the Bishop score. Although not typically completed at the first prenatal
visit, the quadruple screen test can identify about 80% of
Laboratory Data and Diagnostic Tests fetuses with Down syndrome, 80% of those with open
There are many routine laboratory screening tests that neural tube defects, and 60% with trisomy 18. This test
you should order at the first prenatal visit and then again measures blood levels of alpha-fetoprotein, beta-hCG,
at 28 weeks. At the first visit, order a confirmatory preg- estriol, and inhibin A. It is performed between the 15th
nancy test, even if the patient reports a positive home and 22nd weeks.
pregnancy test. Obtain a complete blood count (CBC) A pelvic and transvaginal ultrasound is performed to
to evaluate hemoglobin and hematocrit levels to screen determine that the pregnancy is viable and to confirm
for anemia as well as to establish baseline platelet count. the EDD. Additional ultrasounds may be performed
Be sure ABO and Rh(D) blood typing and antibody between 18 and 20 weeks to assess fetal anatomy and
status are done. Chemistry tests may include thyroid then around 30 weeks to evaluate fetal growth.
stimulating hormone (TSH) and fasting blood glucose In addition to documentation of all test results,
(FBG). Immunologic markers screen for rubella, HIV, be sure to document a treatment plan to address any
hepatitis B surface antigen, and hepatitis C. Syphilis abnormal results. It is beyond the scope of this book to
screening is done by ordering rapid plasma reagin (RPR). address medical treatment, but information on medical
Ensure that urinalysis and urine culture are done. You management and clinical practice guidelines is readily
should obtain vaginal cultures to test for gonorrhea and available (see the Bibliography).
chlamydia. Testing for trichomoniasis may be included if
the patient is considered high risk for sexually transmitted
infections (STIs). If the patient is symptomatic, you may
MEDICOLEGAL ALERT !
consider testing for bacterial vaginosis and candidiasis.
The number of laboratory tests done during pregnancy
Genetic screening may be done for conditions such
is staggering. Review of closed malpractice claims and
as cystic fibrosis and hemoglobinopathies if indicated by
patient safety assessments reveal that inadequate tracking
maternal or paternal history. You should offer aneuploidy
of clinical laboratory and diagnostic tests is a top factor
screening options to all pregnant women presenting for
leading to patient injury, affecting not only the mother but
care, regardless of age. In addition, you can offer consul-
also potentially the developing fetus. All providers and
tation with a genetic counselor to all women considered
institutions must have a system to manage test results that
high risk due to maternal age (age 35 or over at delivery).
includes tracking tests until the results have been received,
Any patient with a personal or family history of genetic
notifying patients of the results, documenting that the
disease should be referred to a perinatologist for further
notification occurred, and making sure that patients with
evaluation once a viable pregnancy is confirmed. Prior to
abnormal results receive the recommended follow-up
performing a screening test, you should have a discussion
care. One of the strongest arguments in favor of an EMR
with the patient about possible results and subsequent
system is that it manages test results efficiently and reliably.
evaluation. There are many noninvasive screening options
Regardless of the type of system used, failure to manage
available. One example is the First Trimester Screen (FTS),
test results correctly and/or failure to document any step
a panel of screening tests that can identify about 85% of
of the process is failure to meet the standard of care.
pregnancies in which the fetus shows signs indicative of
Health Promotion and Disease least once during pregnancy and again after delivery,
Prevention every patient should be screened for risk of developing
postpartum depression using a standardized, validated
You will provide the majority of counseling related to
tool such as the Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale
health promotion and disease prevention at the first pre-
(EPDS). The EPDS consists of ten self-reported
natal visit. You may address some topics, such as weight
items and takes less than five minutes to complete.
gain, teratogen avoidance, and medication use, at every
Interventions, such as education on coping techniques,
prenatal visit. Be sure to document immunization status,
medication, or referral to a mental health provider,
specifically for influenza and tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis
should be provided and documented as needed. If a
(Tdap) vaccines. Complete guidelines for recommended
patient admits to thoughts of or has a plan for suicide,
vaccinations for pregnant women are available at www.
she should be referred immediately to the appropriate
cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy and www.acog.org.
crisis response team or resource.
Nutrition
Patient Education
The initial nutritional status and the ongoing quality of
Patient education is cited as an important part of
maternal nutrition during pregnancy are widely believed
achieving a good pregnancy outcome. It is wise to
to affect the outcome of pregnancy. Women with certain
document educational interventions as further evi-
medical problems, such as diabetes or phenylketonuria,
dence of the provision of high-quality prenatal care.
have specific nutritional needs and may need referral for
It probably is not necessary to document detailed
nutrition assessment and recommendations. Educating
educational material; it is sufficient to note the topics
patients on optimal weight gain during pregnancy can
covered. Other educational topics include exercise, seat
help prevent complications during pregnancy and labor.
belt use, activities to avoid, anticipated discomforts
Excessive weight gain or failure to gain weight during
during pregnancy, and symptoms that should prompt
the pregnancy may prompt further nutritional evaluation.
urgent evaluation. Some professional organizations
Specific nutritional education should include folic acid
offer educational materials that can be customized for
and calcium supplementation as well as use of a prenatal
specific practices and are available in multiple formats
vitamin. Education should be provided on what foods
and different languages.
should be avoided or limited to prevent food-borne
During the remainder of the pregnancy, prenatal
illnesses or toxicities.
care occurs at regular intervals as stated previously.
Table 4-3 shows the history and physical examination,
Psychosocial Factors
testing and treatment, and educational topics included
At the initial prenatal visit, you will perform screening in the interval visits.
for use of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs (also part of
the adult preventive care visit, discussed in Chapter 6).
Tobacco use during pregnancy has well-known risks,
including miscarriage, placental abruption, fetal growth
Documentation of Perinatal
restriction, preterm delivery, birth defects such as cleft and Postpartum Care
lip and palate, and sudden infant death syndrome.
Cessation of tobacco use is highly recommended. Delivery Note
Document that the mother was educated on the risk Labor and delivery typically takes place at a hospital and
of smoking, advised on smoking cessation, and, if the means of documenting obstetric care are dictated
applicable, given intervention materials to aid with by the institution’s record-keeping system, therefore
cessation. Alcohol is a known teratogen, and use of detailed discussion of that documentation is not pre-
alcohol during pregnancy incurs a risk for fetal alcohol sented in this text. Information about commercially
syndrome. Similarly, use of narcotics and other con- available perinatal records and software systems is
trolled or illicit substances can adversely affect fetal readily available.
well-being. Two screening tools for alcohol screening, A delivery note is used to document the outcome of
CAGE and T-ACE, and several screening tools related an obstetric admission (Fig. 4-1). In many hospitals, the
to drug use, are discussed in Chapter 6. The incidence physician in attendance at the time of delivery is respon-
of intimate partner violence (IPV) is known to increase sible for dictating a complete delivery record. A delivery
during pregnancy. Screening for IPV is recommended note serves to document some details of the delivery until
at the preconception visit, the initial prenatal visit, at the final transcribed report is placed in the patient’s chart.
28 weeks, and in the postpartum period. The rate of Typically, the delivery note is part of the maternal record;
detection can be higher when there is screening at however, some EMR systems integrate the delivery note
multiple visits rather than only the initial visit. At into both the maternal and neonatal record.
Vaginal Delivery
Delivery Room Number: 2
Apgar 1 min: 9 Apgar specification: Color: Acrocyanotic (1); Heart Rate: Above 100 (2);
Irritability: Cry/Active withdrawal (2); Tone: Active Motion (2);
Respiration: Good, Crying (2).
Apgar 5 min: 9 Apgar specification: Color: Acrocyanotic (1); Heart Rate: Above 100 (2);
Irritability: Cry/Active withdrawal (2); Tone: Active Motion (2);
Respiration: Good, Crying (2).
Apgar assigned by: Kendra Marshall, RN
Cord blood was sent.
Interventions/Resuscitation:
Newborn Care: spontaneous cry, infant on mom’s abdomen directly, mom and infant bonding, infant
disposition—with mother, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not done, nursery called at 09:13
07/29/2017, nursery present at 09:14 07/29/2017.
Neonatal Airway Suction: no respiratory assistance was given.
Oxygen: oxygen was not administered.
Placenta:
The placenta was delivered with assistance.
Placenta was intact.
On cord examination: 3 vessel cord.
Section of cord retained (section length: 10 cm).
There were cord abnormalities: cord wrapped around neck 1 wrap tightly (clamped and cut).
Delivery Procedures
HPI: Baby Boy Nguyen was born at 39+6 weeks by NSVD. Delivery was uneventful and gestational age by LMP consistent with
22-week ultrasound. Apgar scores of 7 and 9. Baby has been doing well since birth, breastfed x3, stool x1, and void x1. Mom
states that feedings are going well.
MATERNAL HISTORY: 27 yo G2P1001 mom with prenatal labs O+, Ab screen negative, HBsAg negative, VDRL nonreactive,
GC/CT negative, HIV negative, Group B strep negative. Mom took folic acid prior to conception. Prenatal care initiated in first
trimester with 13 documented prenatal visits. Mom did not smoke, drink alcohol, or use illicit drugs during pregnancy. Pregnancy
was uncomplicated. ROM was 7 hours prior to delivery with clear fluid.
Maternal medications: Mom took prenatal vitamins daily. Only other medication was amoxicillin at 23 weeks when mom had UTI;
and OTC antacids PRN starting at 34 weeks.
FH: sibling under bili lights for 2 days in newborn nursery, negative for congenital diseases, childhood deaths, or atopic diseases.
SH: intact family, 3 yo sib. Mom has all baby needs including car seat. Plans to use Pinnacle Pediatrics.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Weight: 7 lb 2 oz / 3265 g Length: 19.8 in / 50.3 cm OFC: 13.5 in / 34.4 cm
Skin: warm, no cyanosis, no jaundice, + red macules with central papules scattered on chest and legs
HEENT: normocephalic, anterior fontanelle open and flat. Red reflex present both eyes; ears normal set/shape; nares patent,
palate intact, mucous membranes moist, tongue midline
Abd: soft, nondistended, liver palpable 2 cm below right costal margin. Normal bowel sounds. Umbilical stump intact/clamped
Musculoskeletal: negative Barlow and Ortolani. Spine straight. No sacral dimples or hair tuft. Leg lengths symmetric. Five fingers
on each hand and 5 toes on each foot; no deformity.
Neurological: normal tone; normal suck, grasp, root and Moro reflexes, DTRs +2 bilaterally. Ballard score = 18 neuromuscular,
17 physical = 35 total
DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES:
Dextrose stick: 87
ASSESSMENT/PLAN:
1. Term AGA newborn; routine newborn care.
2. Erythema toxicum rash: expect spontaneous resolution of rash within 1–2 weeks
3. Anticipatory guidance
4. Hepatitis B immunization prior to discharge
Name
Review
1. List five components of maternal history that should be elicited during the first prenatal visit.
2. List four components of physical examination that should be done at every prenatal visit from 16 weeks
throughout the remainder of the pregnancy.
3. List five laboratory screening tests that should be completed during the initial prenatal visit.
4. List at least four disorders that have a genetic tendency that should be screened for in both maternal and
paternal history.
5. List at least five topics that should be addressed as part of health promotion and disease prevention coun-
seling throughout pregnancy.
Name
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 4. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the content
of this chapter.
ACOG ASCCP
BID BM
BMI CBC
EBL EDC
EDD EMR
EPDS FBG
FTS G, P
H&P hCG
IPV LMP
ms-AFP N/V
PAPP-A PPD
ROA RPR
SOAP SOB
STIs SVD
Tdap TSH
93
Medical History: (Check if the child has ever had any of the following)
Allergies Bladder infection Eye problems Feeding problems
Anemia Breathing problems Hearing problems Skin problems
Asthma Bowel problems Kidney problems Sleep problems
Bedwetting Easy bruising/ Liver problems Seizures
bleeding
Serious injury (type ________)
Social History:
Parents’ marital status: married single separated divorced
Any smokers in the house? yes no
If divorced or separated, who has legal custody? __________________________________________________________________
Car Seat/Seat Belt use: yes no Helmet or other safety measures: yes no
Smoke detector in the house? yes no Do you have a pool? yes no If yes, is it fenced? yes no
Author ISBN #
(continued)
Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. F05_01 6662_C_F05_01.eps
Initials
Date
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 40p9 Initials
Excess weight and obesity in children are significant than 95th percentile). The National Health and Nutrition
public health problems in the United States. A study Examination Survey (2012), or NHANES, reported the
published in the Journal of the American Medical Associ- Author obesity rates for ISBN school-aged
# Author'schildren
review (6 to 11 years of
ation ( JAMA) in 2010 reported that one of every three Sullivan age) at 17.5%6662 and adolescents (if needed) (12 to OK 19 years of age)
Correx
children in the United States is overweight or obese. Fig. #
F05_02
at 20.5%. Being
Document name
6662_C_F05_02.eps
overweight or obese during childhood
Date
The CDC recognizes four categories of weight status: Artist and adolescence Date increases the risk
Initials for developing high
03/06/18
underweight (less than 5th percentile), healthy weight AB cholesterol, Check hypertension,
if revision
respiratory
Editor's review ailments, ortho-
(5th percentile to less than 85th percentile), overweight B / W Xpedic 4/C
problems,
2/C
depression,
2nd color and type OK 2Correx
diabetes. The
PMS
(85th to 95th percentile), and obese (equal to or greater Final Sizeincidence of type
(Width X Depth in Picas) 2 diabetes has increased
Date
dramatically
34p0 x 44p0 Initials
in children and adolescents, particularly in American milestones are identifiable skills that can serve as a guide
Indian, African American, and Hispanic/Latino popula- to normal development. Typically, simple skills need to
tions. The CDC, together with the National Center for be reached before the more complex skills are learned.
Health Statistics, developed a graph for plotting BMI There is a general age and time when most children pass
percentiles. It is shown in Figure 5-3 and is available at through these periods of development. There are also
www.cdc.gov/growthcharts. BMI calculators are readily specific speech and language milestones. Children vary
available online at various Internet sites. in their development of speech and language; however,
there is a natural progression or “timetable” for mastery
Developmental Screening of speech and language skills.
Developmental milestones are physical or behavioral Developmental screening includes subjective in-
signs of development or maturation of infants and formation from parents and caregivers and objective
children. Rolling over, crawling, walking, and talking information observed by the clinician. If a child fails
are considered developmental milestones and provide to meet developmental milestones at the appropriate
essential information regarding the child’s development. age, or if there is any suspicion of developmental delay,
The milestones are different for each age range. The then usually formal developmental testing is warranted.
There are numerous developmental tests that can be (ASQ-3). It contains 21 age-specific questionnaires,
used to screen for developmental delay. Some are aimed which allow for accurate screening anytime between
at parents, whereas others are completed by health-care 1 month and 5½ years of age. Questions ask parents to
providers. The Denver Developmental Screening Test II answer “yes,” “sometimes,” or “not yet.” It takes approx-
(DDST-II) is a 125-item standardized measure that is imately 10 to 15 minutes for parents to complete and
designed to determine whether a child’s development is 2 to 3 minutes for scoring. There is an initial cost for
within the normal range. It includes a set of questions the kit, which provides a user guide, scoring sheets, and
for parents and tests for the child on 20 simple tasks a master set of all 21 questionnaires for printing and
and items that fall into four sectors: personal-social photocopying. The third edition is available in English
(25 items), fine motor adaptive (29 items), language and Spanish; the second edition is available in French.
(39 items), and gross motor (32 items). The number More information is available at http://agesandstages
of items administered during an assessment will vary .com/products-services/asq3.
with the child’s age and ability. The DDST-II scoring
process, which is described in the screening manual, Laboratory Screening Tests
requires that the individual test items be interpreted The goal of screening is to decrease or to eliminate the
before the entire test is interpreted. Screeners must catastrophic effects of preventable mental r etardation.
be properly trained and pass a proficiency test before Genetic disease gained recognition with the introduction
using the DDST-II for clinical purposes. The test of the newborn screening program for phenylketonuria
was previously marketed by Denver Developmental (PKU). In the United States, the early screening of
Materials, Inc., in Denver, Colorado, hence the name. children for special health-care needs and congenital
As of June 8, 2015, the company has closed. However, disorders begins in the newborn period. Under the
the test, manuals, and other materials are available at direction of state public health agencies, all infants are
no cost online at www.DenverII.com. The test can be tested for certain genetic conditions, such as hemo-
used in electronic medical records (EMRs) for free. globinopathies, metabolic disorders, hearing loss, and
The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Develop- other congenital conditions.
ment, Third edition (2009), also known as Bayley-III, Although newborn screening programs differ state by
is recognized as one of the most comprehensive tools state, there are national recommendations to guide and
to assess children from 1 month of age and older. With support states in the development of their program. The
Bayley-III, it is possible to obtain detailed information committee that works to set these national guidelines is
even from nonverbal children as to their functioning. called the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable
Children are assessed in the five key developmental Disorders in Newborns and Children. In addition, the
domains of cognition, language, social-emotional, motor, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
and adaptive behavior. Bayley-III identifies infant and Services reviews the committee’s recommendations. They
toddler strengths and competencies as well as weaknesses. work together to create the Recommended Uniform
It also provides a valid and reliable measure of a child’s Screening Panel (RUSP). The RUSP is a list of 34 core
abilities, in addition to giving comparison data for chil- conditions and 26 secondary conditions which every baby
dren with high-incidence clinical diagnoses. It takes should be screened for. The RUSP recommendation is
between 45 and 60 minutes to administer. A specific not a law, but it serves as a helpful guide for the states.
kit must be purchased to administer the Bayley-III. A list of conditions screened for by state may be viewed at
One tool that parents can complete is the Par- http://babysfirsttest.org/newborn-screening/states. Many
ents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (2007), or of these tests are administered at the hospital before the
PEDS. PEDS contains 10 open-ended questions that infant’s discharge. States may require certain screenings
elicit parents’ concerns about their child. It is both to be performed more than once. Documentation of the
an evidence-based surveillance tool and a screening tests performed and the results guides care of the child
test. PEDS can be used from birth to 8 years of age. and establishes compliance with mandated screening.
It takes just a few minutes to administer and score The Bright Futures guidelines recommend that a clin-
if conducted as an interview. Less time is required if ical risk assessment for lead exposure be performed for
parents complete the questionnaire while waiting or infants at 6 and 9 months of age with blood lead testing
at home before the visit. There is also a version that to follow if positive. The guidelines also recommend
is used to assess attainment of developmental mile- that children who are enrolled in Medicaid, living in
stones, known as PEDS-DM. These tools are available housing built before 1978, or living in high-risk areas
in E nglish, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Information is as defined by the state or local health departments be
readily available at www.pedstest.com. screened for lead at 12 and 24 months of age. Public
Another screening tool that uses parent reporting health authorities in each state are responsible for
is the Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third edition setting state and local policies.
Assessing Vaccination Status Example 5.1 shows one way to document parental
Every pediatric and adolescent visit, whether for refusal.
preventive care or evaluation of an illness or injury, is
an opportunity to assess the child’s vaccination his- EXAMPLE 5.1
tory and determine whether vaccinations need to be L.M. accompanies her 12-year-old daughter H.M. today.
administered. The CDC and the National Immuniza- I recommended administration of human papillomavirus
tion Program publish recommendations for childhood vaccine (HPV) in accordance to CDC guidelines. L.M.
(birth to 6 years of age) and adolescent (7 to 18 years stated, “I don’t want H.M. to have the vaccine.” L.M.
of age) immunizations. They also publish a catch-up states she doesn’t believe the vaccine is necessar y be-
schedule for children who were not immunized at the cause H.M. is not sexually active and that “there are too
recommended ages. The recommendations are updated many vaccines.” I discussed with L.M. and H.M. reasons
annually; visit the CDC website at www.cdc.gov/vac- for the vaccine, including prevention of HPV-associated
cines/schedules/index.html to obtain the most current genital war ts and cer vical, vulvar, vaginal, anal, and throat
schedule. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act cancers. We discussed specifically that HPV vaccination
(NCVIA) of 1986 and the CDC require health-care can prevent most cases of cer vical cancer. H.M. has no
providers to document the date of vaccine administra- contraindications to receiving the vaccine. I discussed
tion; vaccine manufacturer and lot number; name and with L.M. and H.M. possible mild side effects of redness,
business address of the health-care professional who swelling, and discomfor t at the injection site, fever, head-
administered the vaccine; and the Vaccine Information ache, and, rarely, severe allergic reaction; also discussed
Statement (VIS) version date and date the VIS was that benefits of preventing HPV-associated conditions
provided to the parent/guardian. Additionally, the outweigh these risks. I provided VIS on HPV vaccine
AAP recommends documentation of site and route of (12/2/2016) and discussed the information on the VIS
administration, vaccine expiration date, and a statement with L.M.; however, she refuses vaccination today.
indicating that the VIS was discussed with the parent.
VISs are accessible at www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/
index.html. VISs must be produced by the CDC and You should revisit the immunization discussion at
cannot be altered. Health-care providers may add the each subsequent appointment and carefully document
name, address, and other information of their practice, the discussion. For children who are unimmunized or
but substantive changes are not acceptable. The most only partially immunized, some providers may want
current VIS must be given prior to administration of to flag the chart as a reminder to revisit the immu-
every dose of the vaccine (including each dose of a nization discussion as well as to alert the provider
multidose series). about missed immunizations when considering the
Parental refusal of vaccines is a growing concern evaluation of future illness, especially young children
for the increased occurrence of vaccine-preventable with fevers of unknown origin. The AAP provides a
diseases in children. Vaccines play a vital role in Refusal to Vaccinate Form, accessible at www.aap.org/
preventing diseases in children, so it is crucial that en-us/Documents/immunization_refusaltovaccinate.
health-care professionals understand the reasons that pdf. Although the form should not be considered a
parents are hesitant or refuse to vaccinate their children. legal document without advice from a lawyer, it may
Although there are no federal laws regarding vaccine be used as a template for documentation of parental
administration, each state has laws in place dictating refusal. If a parent refuses to sign the form, then you
which vaccinations are required for children prior to should document such refusal, along with the name of
entering schools. a witness to the refusal, in the medical record.
Anticipatory Guidance
Anticipatory guidance refers to specific topics that should
MEDICOLEGAL ALERT ! be discussed with parents and caregivers of pediatric
patients at age-appropriate levels. As children grow
If a parent refuses a recommended vaccine and the
and develop, we anticipate that they will be involved in
child later develops the disease, the issue of profes-
certain activities. For instance, many children learn to
sional liability can arise. Therefore, it is essential that
ride bicycles around 4 to 5 years of age. In anticipation
you document the parent’s refusal. Your documentation
of this, health-care providers should educate parents
should indicate that the parent was informed of why the
and caregivers to talk to the child about bicycle safety,
vaccine is recommended, the risks and benefits of vac-
wearing a helmet, wearing reflective clothing, and so
cination, possible consequences of not vaccinating, and
forth. Table 5-1 presents topics that you should address
any patient educational materials provided.
with parents and caregivers based on the age of the child.
The specific anticipatory guidance topics that should Specific screening tools have been developed for
be discussed at each age-specific visit are incorporated gathering the psychosocial history of adolescents. One
into the EPSDT and AAP forms. Be sure to document commonly used tool can be remembered by the mne-
which topics are discussed with the parent or caregiver. monic HEEADSSS, which stands for home, education/
employment, eating, activities, drugs, sexuality, suicide/
Risk Factor Identification depression, and safety. Henry Berman, MD, developed
For infants and younger children, risk factors for the original HEADS questionnaire in 1972. In 1985, it
developing diseases or conditions often are related was expanded by Drs. Cohen and Goldering to HEADSS
to the mother’s health during pregnancy. Therefore, a (adding suicide/depression screening), and this version
maternal history should be documented for all children was used for nearly 20 years. In 2004, it was updated
2 years of age or younger and may be indicated in older again to address morbidity and mortality factors. The
children if there is concern for developmental delay or second “E” (eating) was added to encourage exploration
if the child has physical abnormalities. Details of the of eating habits and screen for obesity and the third “S”
maternal history are discussed in Chapter 4 and can (safety) to screen for unintentional injury and violence.
be found in Table 4-1. Since the second version of HEEADSSS was released,
Data show that health risks in adolescents are nearly all teenagers have obtained access to the Internet
more social in origin than medical. The American and three-quarters of them use cell phones and send text
Medical Association’s Department of Adolescent messages. This utilization of media profoundly affects
Health developed the Guidelines for Adolescent the lives of adolescents; media may now contribute
Preventive Services (GAPS) with the goal of im- to 10% to 20% of any specific health problem. Thus,
proving health-care delivery to adolescents using questions on media use are critically important and are
primary and secondary interventions to prevent and included in the HEEADSSS 3.0 update. The questions
reduce adolescent morbidity and mortality. The use that comprise the HEEADSSS assessment are shown
of GAPS enables you as the health-care provider to in Figure 5-4; notice that questions are identified as
restructure the visit from a focus on traditional assess- “first line” and “if time permits or if a situation warrants
ment of wellness to identification and treatment of exploration.” Whenever possible, you should conduct
at-risk behaviors, such as drinking, unprotected sex, the interview without the presence of parents, family
nicotine use, or thoughtless or careless approaches members, or other involved adults. Regardless of the
to life. GAPS consists of 24 topics that encompass tool used, documentation of the psychosocial history is
health-care delivery, health guidance, screening, and important to identify and address situations or behaviors
immunizations. that pose a risk for the adolescent.
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), Three out of four adolescent deaths are caused by un-
such as electronic cigarettes (“e-cigarettes”), have intentional injury (e.g., motor vehicle crashes, drownings,
been commercially available since 2004. The use of poisonings, burns) and violence (e.g., homicide, suicide).
e-cigarettes may be referred to as vaping. Youth often Risk factor screening should include questioning about
believe that e-cigarettes are safer than conventional violence—either as an observer, a victim, or an offender.
tobacco use, and they find e-cigarettes easy to conceal The FISTS mnemonic is helpful to remember screening
around adults. Studies show that youth are decreasing questions related to fights, injuries, sexual violence,
their use of conventional cigarettes while increasing threats, and self-defense strategies. Specific questions
use of e-cigarettes. Youth who were at lowest risk of for each of these categories are shown in Figure 5-5.
conventional cigarette use are becoming conventional Unfortunately, children and adolescents may also be
cigarette users after initiating with e-cigarettes. In 2015, the targets of intentional violence. Child abuse is one
more teens used e-cigarettes than regular cigarettes. of the leading causes of injury-related infant and child
You should incorporate screening for ENDS use and mortality. The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment
exposure into the screening for tobacco use. Because Act (CAPTA) defines abuse as a recent act or failure to
ENDS products vary widely and are referred to by act that results in death, serious physical or emotional
many names, ask about use of these products by using harm, sexual abuse or exploitation, or imminent risk
specific names (e.g., electronic cigarettes, e-cigarettes, for serious harm; involves a child; and is carried out by
e-cigs, electronic cigars, electronic hookah, e-hookah, a parent or caregiver who is responsible for the child’s
hookah sticks, personal vaporizers, mechanical mods, welfare. Four types of abuse are generally recognized:
vape pens, vaping devices). As part of tobacco-use neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and emotional
prevention counseling, you should include preven- abuse. Typically, these types of abuse are found more
tion counseling about the known hazards of ENDS in combination than alone. Each state is responsible
and the importance of not initiating use of any for defining child abuse and maltreatment within its
nicotine-containing products. own civil and criminal codes.
Home
Who lives with you?
Where do you live?
Do you have your own room?
What are relationships like at home?
To whom are you closest at home?
To whom can you talk at home?
Is there anyone new at home? Has someone left recently?
Have you moved recently?
Have you ever had to live away from home? If yes, why?
• Have you ever run away? If yes, why?
• Is there any physical violence at home?
Eating
What do you like and not like about your body?
Have there been any recent changes in your weight?
Have you dieted in the last year? How? How often?
Have you done anything else to try to manage your weight?
How much exercise do you get in an average day? Week?
What do you think would be a healthy diet? How does that compare to your current eating patterns?
• Do you worry about your weight? How often?
• Do you eat at home in front of the TV? Computer?
• Does it ever seem as though your eating is out of control?
• Have you ever made yourself throw up on purpose to control your weight?
• Have you ever taken diet pills?
What would it be like if you gained (lost) 10 pounds?
Activities
What do you and your friends do for fun? (with whom, where, and when?)
What do you and your family do for fun? (with whom, where, and when?)
Do you participate in any sports or other activities?
• Do you have any hobbies?
• Do you read for fun? What?
• How much TV do you watch in a week? How about video or computer games?
• What music do you like to listen to?
Drugs
Do any of your friends use tobacco? Alcohol? Other drugs?
Does anyone in your family use tobacco? Alcohol? Other drugs?
Do you use tobacco? Alcohol? Other drugs?
Is there any history of alcohol or drug problems in your family?
Does anyone at home use tobacco?
• Do you ever drink or use drugs when you’re alone? (Assess frequency, intensity, patterns of use or abuse, and how
youth obtains or pays for drugs, alcohol, or tobacco)
Sexuality
Have you ever been in a romantic relationship?
Tell me about the people that you’ve dated. OR Tell me about your sex life.
Have any of your relationships ever been sexual relationships?
What does the term “safe sex” mean to you?
• Are you interested in boys? Girls? Both?
• Have you ever been forced or pressured into doing something sexual that you didn’t want to do?
• Have you ever been touched sexually in a way that you didn’t want?
• Have you ever been raped on a date or any other time?
• How many sexual partners have you had altogether?
(continued)
• Have you ever been pregnant or worried that you might be pregnant? (females)
• Have you ever gotten someone pregnant or worried that that might have happened? (males)
• What are you using for birth control? Are you satisfied with your method?
• Do you use condoms every time you have intercourse?
• Does anything ever get in the way of always using a condom?
• Have you ever had a sexually transmitted disease or worried that you had an STD?
Safety
Have you ever been seriously injured? (How?) How about anyone else you know?
Do you always wear a seat belt in the car?
Have you ever ridden with a driver who was drunk or high? When? How often?
Do you use safety equipment for sports and/or other physical activities (for example, helmets for bicycling or skateboarding)?
Is there any violence in your home? Does the violence ever get physical?
Is there a lot of violence at your school? In your neighborhood? Among your friends?
Have you ever been physically or sexually abused?
• Have you ever been in a car or motorcycle accident? (What happened?)
• Have you ever been picked on or bullied? Is that still a problem?
• Have you gotten into physical fights in school or your neighborhood? Are you still getting into fights?
• Have you ever felt that you had to carry a knife, gun, or other weapon to protect yourself? Do you still feel that way?
Fighting:
• How many fights have you been in during the past year?
• When was your last fight?
Injuries:
• Have you ever been injured in a fight?
• Have you ever injured someone else in a fight?
Sexual Violence:
• Has your partner ever hit you?
• Have you ever hit (hurt) your partner?
• Have you ever been forced to have sex against your will?
• Do you think that couples can stay in love when one partner makes the other one afraid?
Threats:
• Has someone carrying a weapon ever threatened you?
• What happened?
• Has anything changed since then to make you feel safer?
Self-Defense
• What do you do if someone tries to pick a fight with you?
• Have you ever carried a weapon in self-defense?
The most common type of abuse is neglect. Neglect illness, or other). Questions ask if the patient experi-
is the failure of a parent, guardian, or other caregiver enced any of the traumatic experiences prior to the age
to provide for a child’s basic needs. Physical abuse is of 17 and, if a positive response, includes follow-up
nonaccidental physical injury that is inflicted by a parent, questions to assess the individual’s understanding of
caregiver, or other person who has responsibility for his or her childhood trauma. It takes approximately
the child. Such injury is considered abuse regardless of 5 minutes to complete the questionnaire. The results
whether the caregiver intended to hurt the child. Sexual are reported as severity classifications of none or
abuse includes any sexually explicit conduct or simulation minimal, low to moderate, moderate to severe, and
thereof for the purpose of producing a visual depiction severe to extreme.
of such conduct or the rape, molestation, prostitution, The Youth at Risk Screening Questionnaire is
or other form of sexual exploitation of children or incest directed at parents or adult caregivers. A list of 51
with children. Emotional abuse is a pattern of behavior behaviors is given, and parents are asked to indicate if
that impairs a child’s emotional development or sense of the item describes a youth they are concerned about.
self-worth. This may include constant criticism, threats, or Each item is assigned a point value of 1, 5, 10, 15, or 20.
rejection as well as withholding love, support, or guidance. The total score reflects the level of risk that the youth’s
Emotional abuse is often difficult to prove and, therefore, behavior will escalate without intervention. A score
child protective services may not be able to intervene of 5 to 16 indicates low risk; 17 to 32, moderate risk;
without evidence of harm or mental injury to the child. 33 to 84, high risk; and 85 or more, extremely high
Emotional abuse is almost always present when other risk. The questionnaire may be completed online;
forms are identified. Table 5-2, adapted from the Child once submitted, a results page appears along with a
Welfare Information Gateway, summarizes the signs brief list of resources, helpful interpretation material,
that suggest abuse based on characteristics of the child and additional screening resources. The online ver-
or the parent or adult caregiver. sion is available at www.scribd.com/doc/215077310/
If any type of abuse is suspected, there are stan- youth-at-risk-screening-questionnaire.
dardized tools available to assist you with additional Another screening tool is the Childhood Maltreatment
screening and documentation. The Childhood Trauma Interview Schedule—Short Form (CMIS-SF). The short
Questionnaire is a brief survey of six early traumatic form was adapted from the full CMIS, published by
experiences (death, divorce, violence, sexual abuse, John Briere, PhD, in 1992. The form is intended to be
completed by interviewing the patient rather than by Table 5-4 shows neurological reflexes that should be
self-report. Questions typically start with the phrase, tested and documented during infancy. If you detect any
“Before age 17 . . .” and go on to ask about specific abnormalities on physical examination, be sure that your
events that may have occurred, such as a parent having assessment and plan address what additional testing,
problems with drugs or alcohol or an adult yelling at, if any, is indicated and what follow-up will be needed.
insulting, ridiculing, or humiliating the child. If the
response is positive, then you would ask follow-up
questions about how often, who was involved, and so Pediatric Sports
forth. The questions explore psychological, emotional,
and physical abuse. Preparticipation Physical
You as a health-care provider are required by law
to make a report of suspected child maltreatment. For
Examination
more information, see the Child Welfare Information Many pediatric and adolescent patients will want to
Gateway publication, Mandatory Reporters of Child participate in sports activities and usually will need
Abuse and Neglect at www.childwelfare.gov/topics/sys- medical clearance to do so. The preparticipation
temwide/laws-policies/statutes/manda. An additional physical examination may be the only time a healthy
resource for information and referral is the Childhelp® adolescent will see a health-care provider, so it is
National Child Abuse Hotline (1-800-4-A-CHILD or important to include some age-appropriate screening
1-800-422-4453). Documentation should include questions and anticipatory guidance. A comprehen-
the findings that indicate possible abuse, the date the sive medical history that includes questions about a
report is made, the person to whom the report is made personal and family history of cardiovascular disease
and his or her title, and the agency (such as police or is an important component of the preparticipation
child protective services). A copy of any written report evaluation. You should document any personal history
should be incorporated into the child’s permanent of congenital or acquired heart disease as well as a his-
medical record. tory of hypertension or murmurs. Symptoms of chest
discomfort, shortness of breath, palpitations, syncope,
Age-Specific Physical or near-syncope with exercise are important. A known
family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Marfan
Examinations syndrome, or atherosclerosis, as well as a history of
unexplained sudden death in family members younger
Documentation of a newborn physical examination than 50 years of age, are all of concern. Asking about
is presented in Chapter 4. The content of the physical the use of cocaine or anabolic steroids is particularly
examination of pediatric patients includes each of appropriate. You should complete all components of
the systems shown in Table 2-1. You are encouraged an age-specific physical examination with particular
to follow the “head-to-toe” order when conducting emphasis on the respiratory, cardiac, and musculoskel-
a physical examination, but exceptions are made for etal systems. The cardiac examination should include
pediatric patients. If possible, you should auscultate auscultation with provocative maneuvers to screen for
the lungs, heart, and abdomen when the child is quiet hypertrophic cardiomyopathy because this is the most
and not crying. Some components of the examination common cause of sudden death in young male athletes.
are likely to elicit crying, such as examining the ears The recommended musculoskeletal examination is
and the oropharynx and conducting parts of the mus- provided in Table 5-5.
culoskeletal examination. Regardless of the order in Young women are less likely to experience sudden
which the examination is performed, you should always death on the athletic field than young men. In female
document in the order shown in Table 2-5. athletes, however, several predispositions should be
There are many excellent references available that considered. Anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders
teach physical examination techniques. It is beyond are more common among female athletes than among
the scope of this book to present the entire physical male athletes. Screening questions about desires to
examination for all the age-specific well-child visits. change weight or displeasure with body habitus iden-
Once a child reaches school age, the physical exam- tify many of these women. Female runners are more
ination is similar to an adult physical examination. likely to develop stress fractures than are male runners.
Table 5-3 presents a summary of physical examination Osteoporosis occurs in amenorrheic female athletes,
components that should be documented specifically and this finding should prompt further consideration
when performing infant and toddler examinations. of the possibility of an eating disorder.
Name
Review
2. List three growth parameters that should be measured and documented from birth to 24 months of age.
5. List at least three tools that are used to screen children for achievement of developmental milestones.
7. You are performing a sports preparticipation physical on a 15-year-old boy. You review his immunization
record and notice that he is due to receive a tetanus and diphtheria booster; however, his father refuses to
8. For each of the ages listed, list at least three topics that should be discussed with parents/caregivers as part
of anticipatory guidance.
6 months:
2–3 years:
10–14 years:
11. List at least two screening tools that can be used to assess for child abuse or maltreatment.
13. What three systems should be emphasized when examining a child who presents for a preparticipation
sports examination?
Name
kg lb lb
18 40 40
38 95th 38
17
90th
36 36
16
34 34
75th
15
32 32
14 50th
30 30
13 25th
28 28
10th
12
26 5th 26
11 24 24
10 22 22
9 20 20
8 18 18
16 16
7
14 14
6
12 12
5
10 10
4
8 8
3
6 6
2
4 4
kg lb lb
Birth 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Age (months)
Published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 1, 2009.
Source: WHO Child Growth Standards (http://who.int/childgrowth/en)
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. 115
cm in. in.
42 42
105
41 41
95th
40 40
90th
100
39 75th 39
38 38
95 50th
37 37
25th
36 36
90 10th
35 5th 35
34 34
85
33 33
32 32
80
31 31
30 30
75
29 29
28 28
70
27 27
26 26
65
25 25
24 24
60
23 23
22 22
55
21 21
20 20
50
19 19
18 18
45
17 17
cm in. in.
Birth 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Age (months)
Published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 1, 2009.
Source: WHO Child Growth Standards (http://who.int/childgrowth/en)
cm in. in.
56 22 22
54
21 21
52
95th
20 90th 20
50 75th
50th
48 19 19
25th
10th
46 5th
18 18
44
17 17
42
16 16
40
38 15 15
36
14 14
34
13 13
32
12 12
30
cm in. in.
Birth 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Age (months)
Published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 1, 2009.
Source: WHO Child Growth Standards (http://who.int/childgrowth/en)
kg lb lb
40 40
18
95th
38 38
17 90th
36 36
16
75th
34 34
15
32 50th 32
14
30 25th 30
13
28 10th 28
5th
12
26 26
11 24 24
10 22 22
9 20 20
18 18
8
16 16
7
14 14
6
12 12
5
10 10
4
8 8
3
6 6
2
4 4
kg lb lb
Birth 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Age (months)
Published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 1, 2009.
Source: WHO Child Growth Standards (http://who.int/childgrowth/en)
cm in. in.
42 42
105
41 41
95th
40 90th 40
100 75th 39
39
38 50th 38
95 25th 37
37
36 10th 36
90 5th
35 35
34 34
85
33 33
32 32
80
31 31
30 30
75
29 29
28 28
70
27 27
26 26
65
25 25
24 24
60
23 23
22 22
55
21 21
20 20
50
19 19
45 18 18
17 17
cm in. in.
Birth 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Age (months)
Published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 1, 2009.
Source: WHO Child Growth Standards (http://who.int/childgrowth/en)
cm in. in.
56 22 22
54
21 21
95th
52 90th
75th
20 20
50 50th
25th
48 19 19
10th
5th
46
18 18
44
17 17
42
16 16
40
38 15 15
36
14 14
34
13 13
32
12 12
30
cm in. in.
Birth 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
Age (months)
Published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 1, 2009.
Source: WHO Child Growth Standards (http://who.int/childgrowth/en)
Name
1. Based on the information in this write-up, list any risk factors that you identified for A. K.
2. Critically analyze the content of this write-up. Identify other topics or additional information that should
have been included in this write-up.
Name
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 5. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the contents
of this chapter.
AAP ASQ-3
BMI CAPTA
CDC CMIS-SF
DDST-II EMR
ENDS EPSDT
GAPS HPV
HRSA JAMA
MCHB NCVIA
NHANES PEDS
PEDS-DM PKU
RUSP VIS
WHO
125
who do not have any symptoms. Current U.S. screening Risk Factor Identification Based
recommendations are focused on diseases that occur on Personal History
most frequently and that have the highest morbidity
Often indications for screening are based on the
and mortality rates. Many federal and state agencies
patient’s age. For example, the ACS recommends that
and specialty organizations, such as the American Heart
women 45 years of age and older have regular screening
Association (AHA) and the A merican Cancer Society
mammography. However, screening recommenda-
(ACS), also publish guidelines for screening. Although
tions may be different depending on certain personal
many of the recommendations are the same, there are
risk factors. Therefore, a key purpose of obtaining
variations in frequency of screening. It is beyond the
the patient’s personal medical history is to identify
scope of this book to include all the recommendations
conditions for which the patient is at risk and the
that have been published; instead, the most generally
screening measures appropriate for those conditions.
accepted guidelines are summarized. The focus of
Some risk factors are associated with personal habits,
this chapter is documenting preventive care visits for
such as a lcohol or tobacco use or dietary intake. It is
adult patients; prenatal care is discussed in Chapter 4;
important to determine whether these risk factors are
pediatric and adolescent preventive care is discussed in
present; recognize, however, that inquiring about risk
Chapter 5, and older adult preventive care is discussed
factors could appear judgmental. Inform your patient
in Chapter 7.
that you need to ask some questions that could be sen-
sitive in nature, and let the patient know that you ask
these questions of all your patients. Approaching these
Documenting Preventive Care matters in a nonjudgmental, professional, matter-of-fact
manner should enhance patient disclosure of sensitive
Components of a preventive care visit include the
information. The following sections identify some of
following:
the risk factors that you should inquire about, and you
• Risk factor identification based on personal and should specifically document their presence or absence
family health history as part of the personal medical history.
• Appropriate laboratory and diagnostic screening
tests Exercise
• Age- and gender-specific screening, including Lack of exercise or a sedentary lifestyle is a risk factor
preconception screening for certain conditions, such as cardiovascular disease and
• Patient education and counseling diabetes, so you should encourage patients to exercise
• Assessment of vaccination status and administer- regularly. Document any information given to you by the
ing vaccines as appropriate patient related to his or her exercise habits. You should
You may use preprinted forms, such as the adult document the type of activity (e.g., walking, weight lift-
medical history form shown in Figure 6-1, to collect ing, aerobics), frequency, and duration (e.g., 30 minutes
much of the patient’s history, including personal and every other day). The current recommendation is for
family medical history. If using such a form, it is moderate activity five or more days of the week for at
important to review it thoroughly with the patient and least 30 minutes that encompasses a combination of
obtain more information about any positive responses. cardiovascular and weight training.
Specifically document that the form was reviewed
with the patient. Throughout the remainder of this Diet and Nutrition
chapter, several screening tools or questionnaires are The goal of documenting a nutritional history is to
referenced. Such tools are an excellent aid for obtaining help you identify dietary deficiencies or excesses and
and documenting important information during the then educate your patient about how to improve his or
preventive care visit. her nutritional status. Assess dietary habits by asking
When using printed forms or providing written the patient about a typical day’s food intake. Include
material, be sure to assess your patients’ level of health number of meals per day; frequency of eating out and
literacy. The U.S. Department of Health and Human types of eating establishments frequented (such as fast
Services (HHS) defines health literacy as the degree to food, restaurant, cafeteria); number of fruit and vegeta-
which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, ble servings per day; portion size, frequency, and type
and understand basic health information needed to of protein (such as meat, poultry, seafood, dairy or soy
make appropriate health decisions and services needed products); and fiber intake. Determine the amounts
to prevent or treat illness. It is beyond the scope of this of fat (especially saturated), sugar, and processed
book to address this subject; however, information is foods that the patient consumes each day. Instead of
widely available. gathering this information by interviewing the patient,
To be completed by patient
Date: __/__/__
Name: _______________________________________ Age: _______ Date of birth: __/__/__ Male Female
Mailing address: _______________________________________________________________________________________
Home phone: __________________________ Work phone: ________________________ Other phone: _________________
Emergency contact name and phone number: ________________________________________________________________
Employer’s name and address: ______________________________________________________________________________
Please list all the people living in your household and their relationship to you.
Name Age Relationship
Personal Health History: Do you have, or have you ever had, any of the following?
(Check all boxes that apply.)
Allergies Bowel problems Heart problems Nerve problems
Anemia Breathing High blood Seizures
problems pressure
Alcohol/ Cancer High Skin problems
Drug addiction (type ______) cholesterol
Arthritis Depression Kidney problems Stroke
Asthma Diabetes Liver problems Thyroid
problems
Back pain Eye problems Migraine Ulcers
headaches
Blood Serious injury (type __________)
transfusion
___ penicillin ___ sulfa ___ codeine ___ latex ___ vaccines ___ nuts ___ shellfish ___ nickel ___ contrast dye
Other: ____________________________
If any food allergies, please list: _______________________________________________________________________________
(Continued)
Social History:
Marital status: married single
Tobacco use: none chew tobacco cigar/pipe cigarettes _____ packs/day for _____ years quit date ____
Alcohol use: none drinks/week ______ Type of drink ______________
other drug use (type) _________________
Exercise: daily ______ times/week Intensity: low medium high
aerobic weight training
Seat belt use: yes no Helmet or other safety measures: yes no
Women only:
Pap smear ____________ Any abnormal Pap smears? yes no
Mammogram ___________ Any abnormal mammogram? yes no
Do you perform breast self-exams? yes no If yes, how often? ______
Age you started your periods: _______ Are they regular? yes no
Number of days: _______
Do you still have periods? yes no
Have you ever taken hormone replacement therapy? yes no
Have you had bone density testing? yes no
If yes, when and where was most recent? ________________________
How many times have you been pregnant? ________
How many children do you have? ________
Number of vaginal deliveries: _________ Number of C-sections: ________
Men only:
Prostate exam: ____________ Any abnormal prostate exams? yes no
Testicular exam: ____________ Do you perform testicular self-exams? yes no
you may ask the patient to record all food intake for a risk factor for many health problems. BMI is calculated
predetermined amount of time. Then you should in- by using the following formula:
clude a copy of the food diary in the patient’s chart. If
the patient follows a vegetarian diet, document which Weight (kg) ÷ [height(m)]2 (Because height is
type (e.g., vegan, lacto-ovo vegetarian) and assess for commonly measured in centimeters, divide height in
nutritional inadequacies. Document the use of vitamins centimeters by 100 to obtain height in meters.)
and supplements taken, if any. Document the amount Weight (lb) ÷ [height (in.)]2 × 703
of water and other beverages consumed. The quantity
of caffeine consumed per day should be documented BMI calculators are readily available at many Inter-
in standard units of measure, such as how many cups net sites. BMI tables, such as the adult table shown in
of coffee or tea, number of soft drinks, energy drinks, Figure 6-2, are available from many sources. Different
and amount of caffeine-containing foods. tables are used for children and teens. Four different
categories have been identified based on the patient’s
BMI:
Body Mass Index
• Less than 18.5 = Underweight
Obesity is a serious, chronic disease that is known to
• 18.5 to 24.9 = Normal weight
reduce life span, increase disability, and lead to many
• 25 to 29.9 = Overweight
serious illnesses. Studies have confirmed a direct cor-
• 30 or greater = Obesity
relation between increases in body mass index (BMI)
and increases in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, At the preventive visit, it is important to explore why
hypertension, heart disease, stroke, and arthritis. The the patient is obese. Teach the patient that this is a
BMI is calculated based on the patient’s height and reversible risk factor, and encourage weight management,
weight. Although these measurements are obtained nutrition, and exercise. Recognition of the need for
as part of the physical examination rather than the weight loss and accountability as well as support from
history, it is important to review the BMI with every you as the health-care provider remain key elements
patient because being overweight or obese is a major of patient success.
Author ISBN # Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
Copyright © 2019 by6662_C_F06_01_p2.eps
F06_01_p2 F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 24p3 Initials
Figure 6-2 Adult body mass index table. (Courtesy Office of Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion, https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/document/html/chapter3.htm)
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), such as shows how you could document a patient’s tobacco use
electronic cigarettes (“e-cigarettes”), have been available and cessation education that you provide.
commercially since 2004. The use of e-cigarettes may
be referred to as vaping. To date, the health effects of EXAMPLE 6.1
ENDS use have not been well studied, but the nico-
The patient chews tobacco, approximately one pouch
tinergic effects are similar to traditional cigarettes. The
ever y 2 days for the past 12 years. I discussed specific
potential harmful effects of vaping have led the Food
health risks associated with smokeless tobacco, including
and Drug Administration (FDA) to issue warnings
oral cancers (cancer of the throat, tongue, and lar ynx),
regarding the risks of vaping; therefore, you should
leukoplakia, gum disease, cardiovascular disease, hyper-
document the patient’s use of ENDS as part of the
tension, and early mor tality. Patient stated that he is
social history. As with traditional tobacco use, it is
not ready to quit. I advised patient that cessation aids
not enough simply to document that a patient “uses
are available should he desire to quit.
e-cigarettes,” but you should include details of use,
such as type of device used and frequency of use. This
is easily accomplished in a setting using paper chart- If the patient formerly smoked but has quit, document
ing, but it may be challenging if using an electronic the year quit and the pack-year history. Take every
medical record (EMR), because many systems were opportunity to provide positive reinforcement to any
developed before ENDS were used commonly. It may patient who has quit smoking. Unfortunately, some
be necessary to add free-text comments in fields used to patients who quit using tobacco products will start
document other tobacco use. Remember to document again, so ask about tobacco use at every visit.
any discussions about the known risks of ENDS use Use Application Exercise 6.1 to practice calculating
and any education provided on cessation. Example 6.1 pack-year history.
with a lower prevalence of alcohol use, such as women Identification Test (AUDIT), which was developed by
and older adults. The CAGE test is designed to test the World Health Organization. It is accurate 94% of the
alcohol dependency over a lifetime but may fail to time and is also accurate across ethnic and gender groups.
identify binge drinkers. Furthermore, it has a greater sensitivity in populations
The FAST test consists of four questions designed to with a lower prevalence of alcoholism than the CAGE
measure a person’s hazardous drinking in the past year; screening tool. The test consists of 10 multiple-choice
answers are never, less than monthly, monthly, weekly, questions that are scored on a point system. AUDIT
daily or almost daily. The first question is “How often can be administered as a paper-and-pencil test. The
do you have eight or more drinks on one occasion?” If disadvantage of the AUDIT test is that it takes longer
a person answers “never,” then he or she is not a haz- to administer and is more difficult to score than the
ardous drinker, and the remaining questions are not shorter tests. The questions and scoring guide are shown
necessary. If a person answers “monthly” or “less than in Figure 6-3. A score of eight or more indicates an
monthly,” then the other three questions are needed to alcohol problem.
complete the screening. If a person answers “weekly” or Documentation is as simple as stating the screening
“daily or almost daily” on the first question, then he or tool used and the score, such as “CAGE score = 4” or
she is considered a hazardous drinker, and you can skip “AUDIT score of 9.”
the rest of the questions. The remaining questions are:
Use of Other Substances
1. How often during the last year have you been
unable to remember what happened the night Hazardous substance use, abuse, and dependence are
before because you had been drinking? more prevalent in the United States than some of the
2. How often during the last year have you failed to conditions that are routinely screened for, yet health-care
do what was normally expected of you because of providers sometimes fail to identify patients with sub-
your drinking? stance abuse issues. One tool that screens for substance
3. Has a relative or friend, a doctor or other health abuse is the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10)
worker been concerned about your drinking or developed by Harvey Skinner, PhD. It is a 10-item,
suggested you cut down? yes/no, self-report instrument that asks questions about
involvement with drugs in the past 12 months and should
Because of the risk for fetal harm, it is particularly take less than 8 minutes to complete. The DAST-10
important to screen for alcohol use in women who are is intended for use with patients 18 years of age and
pregnant or who may become pregnant. Studies have older. In this screening tool, “drug abuse” refers to the
shown that the T-ACE questionnaire, a four-item use of prescribed or over-the-counter drugs in excess
screening questionnaire based on the CAGE screen- of the directions and any nonmedical use of drugs. The
ing tool, is considered accurate in detecting drinking tool and scoring guidelines are shown in Figure 6-4.
problems in pregnant women. Another tool used for substance abuse screening is the
The T-ACE questions are: National Institute on Drug Abuse Modified Alcohol,
T – Tolerance: How many drinks does it take to Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test
make you feel high? (NIDA Modified ASSIST). The screening may be
A – Have people annoyed you by criticizing your administered in a written version or even accessed online.
drinking? If using a written version, provide a blank cover page
C – Have you ever felt you ought to cut down on to protect patient confidentiality, and then place the
your drinking? completed questionnaire in the patient’s medical record.
E – Eye-opener: Have you ever had a drink first The NIDA Modified ASSIST may be used to screen for
thing in the morning to steady your nerves or tobacco, alcohol, and substance use and dependence. The
get rid of a hangover? first question asks, “Which of the following substances
have you used in your lifetime?” (a) tobacco products,
Affirmative answers to questions A, C, and E are each (b) alcoholic beverages, (c) cannabis, (d) cocaine, (e) pre-
scored one point. A reply of more than two drinks scription stimulants, (f ) methamphetamine, (g) inhalants,
to the T question is scored two points. The T-ACE (h) sedatives or sleeping pills, (i) hallucinogens, (j) street
is considered to be positive with a score of two or opioids, (k) prescription opioids, (l) other. If the answer
more. You should conduct further assessment, provide is “none,” then the screening is complete. If the patient
education, and implement treatment for women who answers affirmatively to using any of the substances,
screen positive in order to reduce the risk of harm to the then the next question asks if the patient has used the
developing fetus and to maximize pregnancy outcome. substance(s) in the past 3 months. Other questions ask
One of the most accurate tests available to screen how often the patient has a strong desire or urge to
for problem drinking is the Alcohol Use Disorders use; how often use of the substance has led to health,
How often during the past year Never Less than Monthly 2–3 times 4 or more
have you failed to do what was monthly per week times a week
normally expected of you
because of drinking?
How often during the past year Never Less than Monthly 2–3 times 4 or more
have you needed a first drink in monthly per week times a week
the morning to get yourself
going after a heavy drinking
session?
How often during the past year Never Less than Monthly 2–3 times 4 or more
have you had feelings of guilt monthly per week times a week
or remorse after drinking?
How often during the past year Never Less than Monthly 2–3 times 4 or more
have you been unable to monthly per week times a week
remember what happened the
night before because you had
been drinking?
Figure 6-3 Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). A score of 8 or more on the AUDIT
generally indicates harmful or hazardous drinking. The first eight questions are scored 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4
points. The last two questions are scored 0, 2, or 4 only. (From Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders
JB, Monteiro MG. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. 2nd
ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance
Dependence; 2001.)
social, legal, or financial problems; and how often use of If the answer to the last question is yes, you should ask
the substance has caused the patient to fail to do what about the pattern of injecting and recommend testing
was normally expected of him or her. Answers include for HIV and hepatitis B and C. For complete informa-
never, once or twice, monthly, weekly, or daily or almost tion on administering and scoring the NIDA Modified
daily. Three yes/no questions complete the screening: ASSIST screen, please visit the National Institute on
Drug Abuse website at www.drugabuse.gov.
1. Has a friend or relative ever expressed concern
about your use of the drug?
2. Have you ever tried and failed to control, cut Sexual History
down, or stop using the drug? Patients and health-care providers alike may not be
3. Have you ever used the drug by injection? comfortable
Author talking about the
ISBN #patient’sAuthor's
sexual history,
review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
CopyrightF06_03
© 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
6662_C_F06_03.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 36p7 Initials
The following questions concern information about your possible involvement with drugs (not including alcoholic beverages) during
the past 12 months. Carefully read each statement and decide if your answer is “Yes” or “No.” Then check the appropriate response
beside the question.
The various classes of drugs may include cannabis (marijuana, hashish), solvents (e.g., paint thinner), tranquilizers (e.g., Valium),
barbiturates, cocaine, stimulants (e.g., speed), hallucinogens (e.g., LSD), or narcotics (e.g., heroin).
1. Have you used drugs other than those required for medical reasons? Yes No
3. Are you unable to stop using drugs when you want to? Yes No
4. Have you ever had blackouts or flashbacks as a result of drug use? Yes No
5. Do you ever feel bad or guilty about your drug use? Yes No
6. Does your spouse (or parents or friends) ever complain about your involvement with drugs? Yes No
7. Have you neglected your family because of your use of drugs? Yes No
9. Have you ever experienced withdrawal symptoms (felt sick) when you stopped using drugs? Yes No
10. Have you had medical problems as a result of your drug use (e.g., memory loss, hepatitis, Yes No
convulsions, bleeding)?
Figure 6-4 Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10). (Courtesy of Dr. Harvey A. Skinner, Dean,
Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.)
are more vulnerable to its health impacts. Conduct IPV Some of the specific exposures that OSHA monitors
screening by asking three simple questions: can be grouped as follows:
1. Within the past year, have you been hit, slapped, • Mechanical: equipment-related injury, puncture
kicked, or otherwise physically hurt by someone? wounds, falls/slips/trips, impact force, compressed
2. Are you in a relationship with a person who air, high-pressure fluid injection
threatens or physically hurts you? • Physical: noise, ionizing radiation, heat or cold
3. Has anyone forced you to participate in sexual stress, electricity, dehydration
activities that made you feel uncomfortable? • Biological: bacteria, fungi (mold), virus, tuberculo-
sis, blood-borne pathogens (e.g., hepatitis, HIV)
With your patient’s disclosure of IPV, your respon- • Chemical: acids, bases, heavy metals (e.g., lead),
sibilities include acknowledging the abuse, making a solvents (e.g., petroleum), particulates (e.g., asbes-
safety assessment, assisting with a safety plan, providing tos), fumes (e.g., noxious gases, vapors), fire
appropriate referrals, and documenting. Documentation • Psychosocial: work-related stress (e.g., too much
should specifically include the victim’s description of overtime), harassment (e.g., sexual, verbal, emo-
current and past abuse, the name of the alleged perpetra- tional), burnout
tor and relationship to the victim, and any information • Musculoskeletal: carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)
or referrals that you provide to the victim. You should and back pain, which account for one third of all
document a detailed description of all physical injuries, serious injuries suffered by American workers
including the type of injury, location (in relation to fixed
landmarks or standard anatomical regions), length, Determine the patient’s specific job duties and assess
width, shape, color, depth, degree of healing, and other risk for work-related injury or any possible exposures.
relevant details such as swelling. Include a detailed If an individual is exposed to potential hazards, ask
description of the patient’s psychological demeanor, whether the employer provides screening. Document
noting gestures, facial expressions, and other relevant the type of screening and how often the screening is
aspects. Use a body diagram to document the location done. Document the use of personal protective devices,
of all visible injuries and scars. If the patient consents, such as goggles, and hearing protection.
photographs may be included in the documentation
and should be identified by the patient’s name, date Oral Health
the photograph was taken, identity of the person taking According to the Centers for Disease Control and
the photograph, and setting in which the photograph Prevention (CDC), nearly one third of adults in the
was taken. United States have untreated tooth decay and 42%
of adults 30 years of age and older have some form
Safety Measures of periodontal disease; this increases to 70% in adults
Adults are at risk for injury resulting from motor vehi- 65 years of age and older. In addition, nearly one fourth
cle crashes; therefore, safety screening should include of all adults have experienced some facial pain in the
documentation of seat belt use and risky behavior while past 6 months. Oral cancers are most common in older
driving, such as drinking alcohol and use of cell phones. adults, particularly those older than 55 years of age who
If the patient rides a motorcycle or bicycle, inquire smoke and are heavy drinkers. Unfortunately, many
about helmet use. Consider safety in the home as well; adults do not get regular dental care. Documentation
ask the patient about and document the presence of related to oral health should include the number of
weapons or firearms, smoke detectors, and any safety dental caries, identification of missing or broken teeth,
equipment such as grab bars in a tub or shower area. condition of the patient’s gums, and the patient’s personal
If the patient has a pool, document the presence of a oral hygiene habits, such as the frequency of brushing
fence around the pool and a pool alarm. In instances and flossing and use of fluoride toothpaste.
of water recreation or sports, document the patient’s
use of sunscreen, personal flotation devices, and eye Blood or Blood Product Transfusions
protection. Although blood or blood product transfusions are rarely
administered in an ambulatory care setting, there are
Occupational History health risks associated with having had transfusions and
The U.S. Congress created the Occupational Safety so any past transfusions should be documented in the
and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1970. Its patient’s record. Document the date, type of product
mission is to prevent work-related injuries, illnesses, transfused (e.g., whole blood, packed cells, fresh-frozen
and occupational fatalities by issuing and enforcing plasma), number of units transfused, and the reason.
standards for workplace safety and health. OSHA’s Document whether there were any complications from
role is to ensure safe and healthful working conditions. the transfusion.
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Risk Factor Identification Based or disease screening for populations identified as high
on Family History risk. If the patient’s history is positive for any of these
familial-tendency conditions, it is important to educate
Obtaining a detailed family history enables you to assess
the patient that he or she has these nonmodifiable risk
risk due to the complex interactions of genes, lifestyle,
factors. The more nonmodifiable risk factors a patient
and exposures experienced by family members as well
has, the more important it is that the patient reduce risk
as susceptibility due to single genes. Conditions known
by controlling those risk factors that can be modified.
to have a genetic familial tendency include diabetes,
Documentation should reflect the education provided
cardiovascular disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia,
initially, and you should document any progress toward
certain types of cancer, asthma, and osteoporosis.
risk modification at subsequent visits.
Establishing genetic risk factors may enable an ear-
Assessing family history as part of risk stratification
lier or more accurate diagnosis and allows you and
is a key initiative of the CDC and HHS. The CDC
your patient to determine the degree of intervention
tool is Family Healthware, an interactive, Web-based
needed, such as preventive measures, surveillance, or
tool that assesses familial risk for six diseases (coronary
management. It is common practice to inquire about
heart disease; stroke; diabetes; and colorectal, breast, and
the medical history of parents, siblings, and grandpar-
ovarian cancer) and provides a “prevention plan” with
ents; however, there are several hereditary conditions
personalized recommendations for lifestyle changes
that require information about multiple generations to
and screening. This tool can be accessed at www.fam-
understand various inheritance patterns, such as with
ilyhealthware.com/consumer. If a patient completes
certain cancers. At a minimum, documentation of the
the screening and is found to have risk for any of the
family history should include the age, health status, and
diseases, document which disease(s) and the prevention
presence of diseases of first-degree relatives, defined as
plan that is implemented.
parents, grandparents, and siblings. Document the age
“My Family Health Portrait” was developed by HHS
of the relative, presence of any conditions that have a
through the Office of the Surgeon General. Part of this
genetic or familial tendency, and current health status
initiative is to encourage discussion among family mem-
of the individual. You should document age and cause
bers about their health history. The tool helps patients
of death for deceased relatives. It may be necessary to
assemble and organize family history information and
remind the patient that a family history is only pertinent
makes a pedigree, which then the patient can print and
for blood relatives, not spouses, in-laws, or people who
present to his or her health-care provider. It does not
are adopted. When a person who is adopted is unaware
offer medical advice or screening recommendations.
of his or her family history, this should be documented
The tool is accessible at https://familyhistory.hhs.gov.
to alert the health-care team that the patient may be at
If the patient brings in a printed report, you should
risk for any genetic conditions. If the family history is
incorporate it into the medical record. You should discuss
positive for any genetically transmitted traits or con-
the results with the patient, and you should document
ditions, documentation may include a pedigree chart,
if any action is indicated, such as additional screening.
using standard symbols to depict inheritance patterns.
There are certain findings from the family history
that are particularly important to document. These Risk Factor Identification Based
include early age at onset, two or more first-degree on Screening Tests
relatives with the same disorder or related conditions, The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is
a family member with two or more related conditions, mandated by Congress to conduct rigorous reviews of
disease occurring in the sex affected less often, and scientific evidence to create evidence-based recommen-
conditions that are refractory to usual treatment or dations for preventive services that may be provided
prevention strategies. These are considered “red flags” in the primary care setting. Since its inception, the
in the family history and indicate a higher level of risk USPSTF has made and maintained recommendations
for family members. Algorithms have been created for on dozens of clinical preventive services that are in-
certain diseases, such as coronary artery disease (CAD) tended to prevent or reduce the risk for heart disease,
and CVA, which consider these characteristics and cancer, infectious diseases, and other conditions and
stratify family history into three risk categories (weak, events that impact the health of children, adolescents,
moderate, and strong). Recent literature is filled with adults, and pregnant women. The task force assigns each
studies evaluating statistical models that predict risk recommendation a letter grade, as shown in Table 6-1,
for disease or some other adverse event. The purpose based on the strength of the evidence and the balance
of a risk prediction model is to stratify individuals of benefits and harms of a preventive service. The task
accurately into risk categories that are clinically rele- force does not consider the costs of a preventive ser-
vant. This risk information can be used to guide clinical vice when determining a recommendation grade. The
decision-making about preventive interventions for people recommendations apply only to people who have no
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
signs or symptoms of the specific disease or condition to as a well-woman examination (WWE), the visit
under evaluation, and the recommendations address includes focus on the gynecological history (including
only services offered in the primary care setting or sexual history and IPV screening, as discussed earlier)
services referred by a primary care clinician. The most for women of childbearing age as well as education
up-to-date version of the recommendations, as well as about menopause and postmenopausal health concerns
the complete USPSTF recommendation statements, when appropriate. In addition to a standard physical
are available along with their supporting scientific examination, a clinical breast examination and pelvic
evidence at www.USPreventiveServicesTaskForce.org. examination should be performed. Other screening
Some of the USPSTF recommended screening tests examinations, such as those shown in Table 6-3, may be
that are appropriate for the general adult population clinically indicated. Your documentation should reflect
are shown in Table 6-2. what screening is done. If a recommended screening is
Various specialty societies, such as the ACS and the not performed, document the rationale.
AHA, and government agencies, such as the CDC, also Screening for STDs and gynecological cancers is
publish recommendations for screening tests. Insurance part of the pelvic examination. Obtain a Papanicolaou
companies may have their own recommended screening (Pap) test to screen for cervical cancer. Bimanual pelvic
tests. Many EMR systems will alert health-care providers examination should be performed to assess the uterus
when an age-related recommended screening test is due and search for any adnexal masses. It is important to
and may help track results of screening tests. It is beyond document whether there is any difficulty performing
the scope of this book to discuss all the screening tests any part of the pelvic examination. Certain patient
that could be performed; determining which screening characteristics may lead to a clinically unsatisfactory
tests to order is based on conditions and diseases for examination. Rather than simply omitting the part of
which the patient is at risk as revealed by the personal the examination that was difficult or unsatisfactory,
medical and social history and family history. you should document the difficulties encountered and
describe why the examination was unsatisfactory. If a
Gender-Specific Screening patient refuses any part of the examination or refuses
to have a screening test that is indicated, you should
Screening for Women document the patient’s refusal in the appropriate sys-
In addition to the history and physical examination that tem (i.e., if the patient refuses the rectal examination,
you will perform for all adult well visits and the screen- document in the genitourinary system) or in the plan
ing recommendations outlined in Table 6-2, the female if a recommended test is refused. Your documentation
preventive care visit typically includes additional risk should record the findings of all screening tests and
assessments, screening, and counseling. Often referred that you discussed the results with the patient.
are underweight have higher risks of preterm birth (less inguinal hernia check as well as the general physical
than 37 weeks estimated gestational age [EGA]), low- examination. In patients 18 to 30 years of age, perform
weight birth (less than 2,500 g), and intrauterine growth a testicular examination to screen for testicular cancers.
retardation. Women who are overweight or obese are A prostate and rectal examination should be performed,
at risk of diabetes, gestational diabetes, hypertension, as indicated in Table 6-4. Test the stool for occult blood
fetal malformation, fetal macrosomia, increased cesarean as part of screening for colorectal cancer. Guidelines
delivery rate, and intrapartum and operative complica- for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening for
tions. Documentation should reflect that you educated prostate cancer are controversial. In 2013, the American
any patients who are under- or overweight on the ideal Urological Association (AUA) announced updated
body weight as well as risks associated with their weight. guidelines indicating that screening in men below
Control of chronic disease is one of the most import- 40 years of age is not indicated. Routine screening in
ant aspects of preconception care. For any patient who men between 40 and 54 years of age at average risk
indicates a desire to become pregnant, you should screen is not recommended. For men from 55 to 69 years of
for diabetes, hypertension, seizure disorder, and use of any age, the decision to undergo PSA screening involves
medication that may have teratogenic effects. It is beyond weighing the benefits of preventing prostate cancer
the scope of this book to address control of these diseases, mortality in one man for every 1,000 men screened over
but your documentation should reflect that you educated the a decade against the known potential harms associated
patient on the importance of controlling these conditions. with screening and treatment. For this reason, shared
Screen patients who wish to become pregnant for STIs decision-making is recommended for men 55 to 69
and other communicable diseases as indicated. Update years of age who are considering PSA screening and
vaccines as needed. As discussed previously, screening for proceeding based on patients’ values and preferences.
use or abuse of tobacco, alcohol, and other substances as Routine PSA screening is not recommended in men over
well as IPV should be part of the preventive care visits for 70 years of age or for any man with less than a 10-year
every patient of reproductive age. Documentation should life expectancy. Your documentation should indicate
reflect what screening is done, any problems or concerns which guidelines you followed as well as any discussion
identified, and a plan to address each. about PSA screening and shared decision-making that
you had with the patient.
Screening for Men If the patient refuses to allow any part of the exam-
The male preventive health visit, also called the well-man ination, document the refusal as well as any education
examination, should include a genital examination and provided to the patient on the importance of the
examination component that was refused. Your docu- customized to a particular practice setting or specialty.
mentation should record the findings of all screening When handouts are given, document the content, and
tests and that you discussed the results with the patient. then ask follow-up questions at the next visit and de-
termine whether the patient has any related questions.
Name
Review
2. List at least five risk factors that should be screened for in the personal history.
5. List one advantage of the AUDIT screening tool compared with the CAGE questionnaire.
9. List at least four facts that should be documented when a patient discloses IPV.
10. List at least three potential complications associated with blood transfusion.
11. List at least four conditions that have a genetic predisposition that should be screened for when taking a
patient’s family medical history.
13. List at least three chronic medical conditions that need special attention during preconception visits.
14. G. A. is a 52-year-old man who presents for his annual well-man examination. List two specific physical
examination components and at least three screening tests that could be ordered for this patient based on
USPSTF recommendations.
Name
Sexual History
J. E., a 23-year-old woman, comes in for her annual WWE. Read the sexual history documented for this visit,
and then answer the questions that follow.
In the past 2 months, J. E. has had 3 partners. In the past year, she has had approximately 9 or 10 partners.
She denies anal intercourse. Does engage in oral sex. She had been treated for an STD once in the past. She
is on Seasonique oral contraceptive.
1. What additional information should have been included in J. E.’s sexual history?
4. List at least three screening assessments, tests, or counseling (including those recommended by the
USPSTF) that should be done during this visit.
Name
2. What conditions with a known genetic familial tendency should K.S. be screened for at this time?
3. Based on USPSTF recommendations, what additional screening should K.S. have at this time?
4. What patient counseling or education should you provide to K.S. and document in his medical record?
Name
Adult Vaccinations
Consult the current adult vaccination recommendations available at the CDC website (www.cdc.gov/vaccines/
schedules/hcp/adult.html). Answer the questions that follow.
1. What vaccines are indicated for a 40-year-old man who has sex with men and who had his last tetanus
immunization 6 years ago?
3. What vaccines are recommended for a 21-year-old woman who plans to start nursing school in 6 months
who received one HPV vaccine at age 12?
4. What vaccines are recommended for a 63-year-old woman who volunteers at a public library and has
diabetes?
5. A 34-year-old man undergoes splenectomy following an accident in which he sustained blunt abdominal
trauma. Which vaccines are indicated for this patient?
Name
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 6. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the context
of this chapter.
ACS AHA
AHRQ AUA
AUDIT BMI
CAD CDC
CTS CVA
DAST-10 EGA
EMR ENDS
FDA HHS
HPV IPV
NIDA-Modified ASSIST OSHA
PID PPD
PSA STD
STI USPSTF
WWE
1. General Health:
In general, would you say your health is:
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
How much bodily pain have you had during the past 4 weeks?
None
Very Mild
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Very Severe
g. How many falls have you had in the past year? _____________
(Continued)
Author ISBN #
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. Author's
All review
rights reserved.
Sullivan 6662(if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
F07_01_p1 6662_C_F07_01_p1.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
07_Sullivan_Ch07.indd 154 7/3/18 9:14 PM
Initials
Chapter 7 Older Adult Preventive Care Visits | 155
5. How many medicines do you take, including prescribed, over the counter, and vitamins? _____________
What is your system for taking your medications?
Pill box
Family help
List or chart
None
9. Please draw the face of a clock with all the numbers and the hands set to indicate 10 minutes after 11 o’clock.
Memory: 3 item recall after 1 minute (pen, dog, watch) # recalled ____________
Figure 7-1 Geriatric Health Questionnaire. (From Rakel D. Textbook of Family Medicine. 7th ed.
Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2007.)
are added or if dose adjustments are made, document the EXAMPLE 7.1
indication. Special consideration should be given to the E.P.’s urine culture showed infection with multidrug
possibility of drug–drug and drug–disease interactions; resistant E. coli. The only effective oral antibiotic is
most electronic medical record (EMR) systems feature nitrofurantoin, which is identified by Beers criteria as
alerts that will notify the provider of such interactions. a medication that is potentially inappropriate. All other
The Beers criteria, published by the American Geriatric effective antibiotics would require parenteral admin-
Society (AGS), include lists of potentially inappropriate istration. E.P.’s most recent blood work demonstrates
medication to be avoided in older adults. The 2015 estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 50%,
update includes lists of select drugs that should be so she is not likely to have accumulation effects due to
avoided or should have their doses adjusted based on an inadequate excretion. She does not have any pulmonar y
individual’s kidney function. The update also includes disease. I discussed the culture results and treatment
select drug–drug interactions that were documented to options with E.P. and she would prefer to take oral
be associated with harm in older adults. Unfortunately, medication rather than intravenous. A prescription
the criteria have sometimes been misinterpreted and was sent to her pharmacy for standard 10-day course
misused. The potentially inappropriate medications are of nitrofurantoin.
just that—potentially inappropriate—and should not be
misconstrued as universally unacceptable for older adults
in all cases. If you are prescribing a medication identified
as potentially inappropriate, you should document your To become more familiar with the Beers criteria,
rationale for doing so as shown in Example 7.1. complete Application Exercise 7.1.
Author ISBN # Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. F07_01_p2 6662_C_F07_01_p2.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 28p10 Initials
The Nutrition Screening Initiative • 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, NW • Suite 800 • Washington, DC 20007
The Nutrition Screening Initiative is funded in part by a grant from Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Author ISBN # (Continued )
Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. Fig. # Document name
F07_02_p1 6662_C_F07_02_p1.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W X 4/C 2/C PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
41p0 x 54p3 Initials
07_Sullivan_Ch07.indd 157 7/3/18 9:14 PM
158 | Guide to Clinical Documentation
malnutrition in less than 5 minutes. The form consists physical and mental health. Hearing loss inhibits the
of six questions and has been validated as an efficient ability to interpret speech. This, in turn, may reduce
screening tool. The score for screening is derived from a patient’s ability to communicate, which can result
six components—reduced food intake in the preceding in social isolation, depression, and anxiety and can
3 months; weight loss during the preceding 3 months; pose environmental safety issues, such as the inability
mobility; psychological stress or acute disease in the to hear warning alarms or someone knocking on the
preceding 3 months; neuropsychological problems; and door. The United States Preventive Services Task Force
body mass index (BMI). The MNA-SF has predictive (USPSTF) currently recommends screening older adults
validity for other components, including adverse health for hearing impairment by periodically questioning
outcome, social functioning, and rate of visits to the general them about their hearing, counseling them about the
practitioner as well as length of hospital stay, likelihood availability of hearing aid devices, and making refer-
of discharge to a nursing home, and mortality. The com- rals for abnormalities when appropriate. The optimal
plete tool and scoring criteria may be accessed at www frequency of such screening has not been determined
.mna-elderly.com. Positive findings in the history should and is left to the clinician’s discretion.
prompt further assessment with physical examination. The Hearing-Dependent Daily Activities (HDDA)
Scale is shown in Figure 7-3. It is a rapid and easy method
Sensory Deficit Screening of assessing the impact of hearing loss on daily life. This
Hearing loss is the third most prevalent chronic condi- scale has been shown to correlate well with pure tone
tion in older adults and has important effects on their audiometry, which is the standard test for assessment of
The table below presents the Hearing-Dependent Daily Activities (HDDA) questionnaire used to evaluate the effect of hearing loss in
older persons. Providers should score “Always” and “No, I Can’t” as 0 points, “Occasionally” and “With Some Difficulty” as 1 point,
and “Never” and “Yes, Without Difficulty” as 2 points.
1. Have you noticed that you don’t hear as well as you used to?
3. Does your family tell you that you turn up the volume of the television or radio
very loudly?
4. When you’re talking to someone, do you have to ask the person to speak
louder?
5. When you’re talking to someone, do you have to ask the person to repeat
what they’re saying various times?
10. Can you hear when someone approaches you from behind?
11. Can you hear when someone is speaking to you in a noisy setting such as a
pub or restaurant?
12. Can you hold a conversation in a group setting when several people are
speaking at the same time?
Figure 7-3 Hearing-Dependent Daily Activities (HDDA) Scale. (From the American Academy
of Family Physicians. Hidalgo JL-T, et al. The Hearing-Dependent Daily Activities Scale to evaluate
impact of hearing loss in older people. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:441-447.)
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
hearing loss. Patients are asked 12 questions about their history of all older adults. Four risk factors have been
level of hearing and understanding. Each question has identified as common to these syndromes:
a range of three possible answers. The lower the score,
1. Older age
the greater the impact of hearing loss on the patient’s
2. Functional impairment
daily activities. If you identify a hearing deficit through
3. Cognitive impairment
history taking, then the physical examination should
4. Impaired mobility
include specific measures to assess hearing.
Visual deficits can dramatically impact a person’s Three of these four factors are amenable to intervention;
mobility and other essential functions, such as meal therefore, it is imperative that you assess your older
preparation or medication management. As part of adult patients for these risk factors. Documenting the
the review of systems, document if there have been any presence or absence of these risk factors, and a treat-
changes in vision, date of last vision testing, presence ment plan to address each one, should be part of every
or absence of eye discomfort or pain, excessive tearing, preventive care visit for the older adult.
or blurred vision. Falls are a significant cause of morbidity and mortal-
ity, occurring in 30% of adults over 65 years of age and
Mental Health Screening 40% over 80 years of age; therefore, the focus should
Depression is common in older adults and may go un- be on preventing falls. Environmental factors that can
detected unless specifically screened for. If the patient help prevent falls include adequate lighting, use of
gives a positive response to either of the following two grab bars or assistive devices such as canes or walkers,
questions, further inquiry is needed: a clutter-free environment, and removing throw rugs
or having nonskid backs on all rugs. If there are pets
• Over the past month, have you often been both- in the house, patients should be alert to their location
ered by feeling sad, depressed, or hopeless? to avoid tripping over them. Nonenvironmental factors
• During the past month, have you often been that may cause falls include decrease in vision; lack of
bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing flexibility; loss of muscle strength, especially in the
things? legs; and changes in sleep patterns. Other important
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is designed risk factors for falls in older adults are medication use
specifically to screen for depression in older adults. The and chronic health conditions. High-risk medications
GDS questions are answered yes or no. This simplicity include calcium channel blockers, analgesics, sedatives,
enables the scale to be used with individuals who are ill and hypnotics. If a patient has been prescribed any of
or moderately cognitively impaired. Two different scales these medications, make sure he or she is educated on
are available: a long form that contains 30 questions the potential risk, and the education that you provide
and a short form that contains 15 questions. Either should be documented. Conditions such as heart disease,
form may be used as part of a comprehensive geriatric peripheral vascular disease, neuropathies, and bladder
assessment. The scoring for the long form, shown in incontinence also can increase the risk for falling.
Figure 7-4, sets a range of 0 to 9 as “normal,” 10 to 19 as
“mildly depressed,” and 20 to 30 as “severely depressed.”
The short form has a similar scale, with 0 to 4 being Assessing Older Adult Risk
“normal,” 5 to 7 “mildly depressed,” 8 to 11 “moderately
depressed,” and 12 to 15 “severely depressed.” Factors Through Physical
Geriatric Syndromes
Examination
The term geriatric syndrome has been defined by Inouye The physical examination of the older adult follows the
and colleagues (2007) as “multifactorial health conditions standard head-to-toe approach. Positive findings from
that occur when the accumulated effects of impairments the history will help guide the physical examination. The
in multiple systems render an older person vulnerable general assessment is important to establish an overall
to situational challenges.” The term is used to capture sense of the patient’s health status and global functioning.
those clinical conditions in older people that do not fit You should document the patient’s height, weight, and
into discrete disease categories and include conditions BMI at every visit, along with standard vital signs. If
such as functional decline, falls, delirium, frailty, pressure the patient has any chronic medical problems, such as
injuries, and urinary incontinence. These syndromes cardiovascular disease or arthritis, you should examine
represent common, serious conditions for older people, the corresponding body system(s) and document your
holding substantial implications for functioning and findings. Other specific screening recommendations
quality of life, and should be assessed as part of the for older adults are presented.
Original scoring for the scale; one point for each of these answers.
Scale
0–9 Normal range
10–19 Mild depression
20–30 Severe depression
Figure 7-4 Geriatric Depression Scale, long form. (From Brink TL, Yesavage JA, Lum O, Heersema P,
Adey MB, Rose TL. Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clin Gerontol. 1982;1:37-44.
conduction and sensorineural hearing loss and may diagnostic criteria for dementia) in many people. For
prompt referral for further evaluation. scoring, one point is given for each recalled word. The
CDT is scored as either “normal” (patient places the
Balance and Mobility Assessment correct time and the clock appears grossly normal) or
Several tools exist to help determine a person’s risk for “abnormal” (incorrect time or abnormal clock). A score of
falling. One very simple test is the Timed Up and Go zero is positive for cognitive impairment. An abnormal
test. The score is recorded as the number of seconds it CDT with a score of 1 or 2 on the three-word recall test
took to complete the test and gives an assessment of is positive for cognitive impairment. A normal CDT
the patient’s mobility. Another tool is the Berg Balance and a score of 1 or 2 on the word recall test is negative
Test, which is a performance-based assessment tool that for cognitive impairment. You should incorporate the
is used to evaluate standing balance during functional completed CDT into the patient’s medical record, and
activities. The patient is scored on 14 different tasks, the patient’s serial drawings over time can be helpful
such as reaching, bending, transferring, and standing. in determining disease progression.
Elements of the test are representative of daily activities
that require balance, such as sitting, standing, leaning
over, and stepping. Some tasks are rated according to the Additional Screening
quality of the performance of the task, whereas others
are evaluated by the time required to complete the task. National guidelines are established for routine screening
Scores for each item range from 0 (cannot perform) of older adults for certain conditions. The USPSTF
to 4 (normal performance). Overall scores range from recommendations for older adults include screening
0 (severely impaired balance) to 5 (excellent balance). for the following medical conditions, which is gener-
The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ally accomplished through a combination of physical
tool is a test that evaluates both balance and gait. It starts examination and laboratory and other diagnostic tests:
with a component to measure balance, similar to the
Timed Up and Go test described earlier. In addition, • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
the patient’s gait is evaluated for step length and height, • Breast cancer
symmetry, and continuity. Other factors, such as trunk • Carotid artery stenosis
motion and walking stance, are included in the scoring. • Coronary artery disease
The score indicates the patient’s risk of falling as low, • Cervical cancer
medium, or high; the lower the score, the greater the • Colorectal cancer
risk of falling. Document the tool used and the score. • Osteoporosis
• Ovarian cancer
Cognitive Assessment • Peripheral artery disease
Dementia is a chronic, progressive loss of cognitive and • Thyroid disease
intellectual functions. Early screening for dementia A list of all USPSTF recommendations may be found
becomes more important with the advent of newer at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/
treatment regimens. The Mini-Cog test is a 3-minute topics-and-recommendations.
instrument to screen for cognitive impairment in older In addition to these screening tests, you should assess
adults in the primary care setting and can easily be in- the vaccination status of the older adult at every visit.
corporated into the physical examination. The Mini-Cog The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
uses a three-item recall test for memory and a simply regularly publishes recommended vaccination schedules
scored clock-drawing test (CDT). The latter serves as for older adults; the schedule may be viewed at www.
an “informative distractor,” helping to clarify scores cdc.gov/vaccines. When vaccines are given, document
when the score for memory recall is intermediate. The the date of administration, vaccine manufacturer and lot
Mini-Cog was as effective as or better than established number, and the name of the health-care professional
screening tests in both an epidemiological survey in a who administered the vaccine.
mainstream sample and a multiethnic, multilingual
population comprising many individuals of low socio-
economic status and education level. In comparative
tests, the Mini-Cog was at least twice as fast as the
Pre-operative Evaluation
mini-mental state examination. The Mini-Cog is less of Older Adults
affected by patient ethnicity, language, and education and
can detect a variety of different dementias. Moreover, Although older adults are not the only ones who
the Mini-Cog is better at detecting only mild cognitive may need pre-operative evaluation, the percentage of
impairment (cognitive impairment too mild to meet peri-operative complications is higher in the older adult
population than in other age groups. The purpose of a and providing a baseline level, which can be helpful
pre-operative evaluation is not to “clear” patients for information postoperatively, particularly for surgeries
elective surgery but rather to evaluate and, if necessary, with potential hemorrhagic complications. Renal and
implement measures to prepare higher risk patients for liver function studies are not routinely needed but may
surgery. Pre-operative outpatient medical evaluation can be indicated for patients who have a medical condi-
decrease the length of hospital stay as well as minimize tion or medication use that would serve as indications
postponed or cancelled surgeries. To effectively provide for these tests. Pre-operative glucose determination
this service, you should understand the risk associated should be obtained because the presence of diabetes
with the particular type of surgery planned and relate increases peri-operative risks. Coagulation studies
this risk to the patient’s underlying acute and chronic (PT, INR, PTT) are not routinely indicated, because
medical problems. The complete evaluation should studies have shown that the yield is very low and that
include recommendations for evaluation and treat- abnormal results are expected or do not significantly
ment, including prophylactic therapies to minimize affect management. Coagulation studies are indicated
the peri-operative risk. Advanced age places a patient if the patient is receiving anticoagulant therapy or has
at increased risk for surgical morbidity and mortality a personal or family history that suggests a bleeding
because of increased likelihood of underlying disease disorder or has evidence of liver disease.
states. In one study (Ersan, 2015), the mortality rate Cardiopulmonary assessment may reveal key features
for patients older than 70 years of age undergoing that warrant pre-operative intervention or further
elective cholecystectomy was nearly 10 times that of evaluation, including elevated blood pressure, heart
younger patients. When age and severity of illness are murmurs, or signs of congestive heart failure or chronic
directly compared, severity of illness is a much better obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An ECG should
predictor of outcome compared to age. Emergency be obtained in patients older than 40 years of age or in
operations carry a greater risk compared to elective patients with a history of previously diagnosed coronary
operations in all age groups, particularly older adults. artery disease, any previous cardiovascular procedural
Diseases associated with an increased risk for surgical interventions or testing, current therapies, and any
complications include respiratory and cardiac disease, current symptoms suggestive of angina or congestive
malnutrition, and diabetes mellitus. Ideally you should heart failure. Patients in whom cardiac stress testing
evaluate the patient several weeks before the operation, was normal within the past 2 years or who have had
and you should manage any chronic diseases prior to coronary bypass surgery within the past 5 years, and
surgery. The history should include information about are without symptoms, require no further assessment.
the condition for which the surgery is planned, any Importantly, no pre-operative cardiovascular testing
past surgical procedures, and the patient’s experi- should be performed if the results will not change
ence with anesthesia. Document the presence of any peri-operative management (Zambouri, 2007). It is
chronic medical conditions, particularly of the heart beyond the scope of this text to address specific car-
and lungs. Make note of any medications (including diac conditions and pre-operative risk assessment for
over-the-counter medications). You may need to adjust each condition; further information may be obtained
drug dosages in the peri-operative period. Aspirin, non- from the American College of Cardiology/American
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anticoagulation Heart Association Guideline Update for Peri-operative
medications may need to be discontinued or have dose Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery
adjustment prior to surgery to avoid excessive bleeding. (Eagle et al, 2014).
Pre-operative laboratory and diagnostic studies once The major pulmonary complications in the peri-
routinely included a complete blood count (CBC), operative period are atelectasis, pneumonia, and bron-
comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), urinalysis, chitis. Predisposing risk factors include cough, dyspnea,
prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio smoking, a history of lung disease, obesity, and abdominal
(INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), electrocar- or thoracic surgery. Chest x-rays may be helpful for
diogram (ECG), and chest x-rays. Numerous studies patients with these conditions, not only to screen for
have subsequently shown that most of these tests were active conditions but also to establish a baseline. You
ordered without a clear indication and that only a should evaluate patients with cough or dyspnea to identify
very small percentage of the results were unexpectedly the underlying cause of the symptoms. Advise patients
abnormal. Current recommendations call for fewer who smoke cigarettes to quit smoking for 8 weeks before
routine tests and for selective ordering of laboratory surgery to allow the mucociliary transport mechanism
tests based on specific indications. In addition, the to recover, the secretions to decrease, and the carbon
availability of previous laboratory testing can obviate monoxide levels in the blood to drop. You should treat
the need for pre-operative tests. A hemoglobin mea- any pulmonary infections pre-operatively. Pulmonary
surement is useful in detecting unsuspected anemia complications may be prevented by providing patients
with instructions on how to perform incentive spirom- planned and patient-specific health parameters to deter-
etry and deep-breathing exercises. mine the patient’s overall risk of developing postoperative
The decision to proceed with elective surgery begins complications. A written report can be generated, which
with an assessment of risk of developing postoperative you then can incorporate into the patient’s medical record.
complications. A Web-based risk calculator is available The risk calculator may be accessed at http://riskcalculator
from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) that .facs.org/RiskCalculator. To gain experience in using the
allows you to enter information about the type of surgery calculator, complete Application Exercise 7.2.
Hospice and Palliative Care primary physician and can help with treatment of pain
Although not unique to the older patient, the need for and other symptoms, assistance with communication
care for noncurable or terminal conditions often arises regarding diagnosis and prognosis, support for patients
in this population; therefore, you should understand and families in medical decision-making and in navi-
the services that may be provided through hospice and gating the complex medical system, and emotional and
palliative care agencies. Hospice and palliative care spiritual support. Because palliative care services are
are very similar, and both focus on providing care and often delivered through a hospital, it is likely covered
comfort to patients who are dying. Most people have by regular medical insurance.
heard of hospice and have a general understanding of
the services provided by hospice; often, people are less
familiar with palliative care. Hospice always provides
Summary
palliative care, but hospice is targeted care for those Care of the older adult presents unique challenges to
patients who are no longer seeking curative therapy. health-care providers. The responsibility of managing
For hospice services, a patient is generally considered complex and often multiple chronic diseases, along
terminal or within 6 months of death, and the referral with ongoing assessment of a variety of risk factors,
to hospice is often through the primary care provider. may seem overwhelming at times. It is helpful to use a
Hospice programs often rely on the family caregiver, rolling assessment approach with older adults, focusing
as well as a visiting hospice nurse, to provide services on a single domain of risk assessment at each visit. Risk
in the home or at an inpatient hospice facility. Most factor assessment is achieved primarily by taking an
hospice services concentrate on comfort rather than in-depth history. Positive findings from the history then
aggressive disease treatment for the patient who is direct you to areas of the physical examination that may
terminally ill. Insurance payments for hospice services need special attention. Many tools and references exist
vary greatly, and many hospice programs are covered to aid in providing timely screening and risk assessment.
under Medicare. Guidelines from many professional organizations are
Palliative care often fills the gap for patients who want also helpful in providing risk assessment. Discussions
and need comfort at any stage of any disease, and there about end-of-life care decision-making and what type
is usually no expectation that life-prolonging therapies of interventions a patient is willing to accept often
or aggressive treatment will be avoided. Palliative care take place with older adults and their family members
can be received by patients whether or not their illness is or caregivers. Documentation of the patient’s wishes
terminal, and such care focuses on providing relief from and intent helps to ensure that his or her wishes are
the symptoms and stress of a serious illness. The goal honored. Reviewing the worksheets that follow will
is to improve the patient’s quality of life. The majority help reinforce the contents of this chapter. And be sure
of palliative care is provided in an inpatient setting. to review Appendix A, the Document Library, for full
The palliative care team works in conjunction with the case examples of patient documentation.
Name
Review
1. List at least four risk factors that should be assessed in older adults through history taking.
2. List at least four risk factors that should be assessed in older adults through the physical examination.
6. List at least five factors that may contribute to falls in older adult patients.
8. List two diseases associated with an increased risk for surgical complications.
11. Describe the difference between medical and durable power of attorney.
12. Caring Connections is a program of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. Visit its website
at www.caringinfo.org and find your state’s requirements for a living will and power of attorney.
Name
1. Based on the preceding information, how would you interpret and document J. H.’s Mini-Cog results?
2. What additional screening examinations could be conducted as part of the evaluation of J. H.’s weight
loss?
4. Based on his age, J. H. could be screened for other risk factors; name at least four.
Name
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations were used in Chapter 7. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the
chapter content.
ACS ADL
AGS BMI
CBC CDC
CDT CMP
COPD ECG
GDS EMR
IADL HDDA
MNA-SF INR
PT POA
USPSTF PTT
173
Mammogram Date
Result
Prostate/Testicular Date
Result
Date
PSA
Result
Colonoscopy/Sigmoid Date
Result
FOBT Cards Date
Result
CBC Date
Result
CMP Date
Result
Date
TSH
Result
Date
Total Cholesterol
Result
Date
HDL
Result
Date
LDL
Result
Date
Triglycerides
Result
Date
CXR
Result
Date
ECG
Result
Date
DEXA
Result
Figure 8-1 Sample form for health history with problem list. Author ISBN # Author's review
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis
Sullivan 6662
Company. All rights reserved.
(if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
F08_01 6662_C_F08_01.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
08_Sullivan_Ch08.indd 174 7/3/18 6:26 PM
41p0 x 54p10 Initials
Application Exercise 8.1
Use the data from Figure 8-1, create a problem list for Mr. Jensen, and then compare it with the
problem list shown.
Application Exercise 8.1 Answer
Problem list for Mr. Jensen.
Mammogram Date
Result
Prostate/Testicular Date
Result
Date
PSA
Result
Colonoscopy/Sigmoid Date
Result
FOBT Cards Date
Result
CBC Date
Result
CMP Date
Result
Date
TSH
Result
Date
Total Cholesterol
Result
Date
HDL
Result
Date
LDL
Result
Date
Triglycerides
Result
Date
CXR
Result
Date
ECG
Result
Date
DEXA
Result
pertinent data as soon as they are received. For exam- had adverse reactions to any medications, such as a
ple, if a bone density report confirms the diagnosis of cough from an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
osteoporosis, then add this diagnosis to the problem inhibitor or severe nausea from codeine, document
list. Upon receiving a hospital discharge summary, any this information on the medication list as well. You
newly diagnosed conditions should be added to the list. may wish to include information about the patient’s
The organization and content of the problem list will insurance plan if use of a specific formulary is required.
vary depending on the needs of the practice or facility. In many EMRs, formulary information is built into
Refer back to the comprehensive history and physical the system and will alert you if a medication is not
examination shown in Figure 2-2 to complete Appli- covered by the patient’s insurance. It is convenient
cation Exercise 8.1. to include the name, location, and telephone number
for the pharmacy that the patient uses to fill prescrip-
Medication List tions; this information must be available if prescribing
A medication list provides a quick and easy format electronically. It is imperative that you review and
to document all the medications a patient is taking at update the medication list at every visit. In addition,
any given time. All prescription and nonprescription encourage your patients to maintain their own medi-
medications should be listed. It is important to include cation list because access to the record in your facility
herbal products, vitamins, minerals, dietary supple- may not always be possible. Many a pplications are
ments, or other regularly used over-the-counter (OTC) available for use on personal electronic devices, and
products. A comprehensive list will alert you to possible some include reminder alerts for when medications
drug–drug, drug–disease, or drug–herb interactions. It should be taken.
also will help to avoid duplication, such as prescribing
too many agents containing acetaminophen. The list
should include the name of the medication, indication, MEDICOLEGAL ALERT !
strength, and dosing directions, as shown in Figure 8-2.
You may wish to include the quantity written for and Although the medication list is helpful as a quick
number of refills authorized on the medication list in reminder of medications that a patient is taking, you
order to have this information easily located in one should never assume that it is a complete and accurate
place. (Prescription writing is covered in detail in record. Patients may start taking medications on their
Chapter 9.) This is helpful to office staff who may take own or because it was prescribed by another provider,
messages from patients or pharmacies requesting refills. or they may discontinue a medication and forget to tell
If a patient takes more than one prescription drug for you. It is your responsibility as the provider to determine
a condition, such as antihypertensive medications, it what medications the patient is taking at every visit
is helpful to list those medications together. When a before writing any prescriptions. You should specifically
medication is discontinued, it is helpful to document document “medication list reviewed” and the date of
the date and reason why directly on the medication list. the review; and if any discussion about medications
Make note of any medication allergies prominently in ensues, document that as well.
the chart, and be sure to document on the medication
list the specific reaction to each. Allergies to food or
other substances, such as nickel, latex, or tape, may Refer back to the comprehensive history and physical
be included on the medication list or documented examination for Mr. William Jensen shown in Figure 2-2
as part of the past medical history. If the patient has to complete Application Exercise 8.2.
MEDICATION LIST
MEDICATION LIST
correctly, or the correct treatment has not been initiated. EXAMPLE 8.1
It is important to have a conversation with the patient, Noncompliance Note
and perhaps family members or caregivers, to determine S: M r. Graham, age 49, is here for follow-up on
whether noncompliance is a factor. Ask the patient h yper tension. He has not been taking the hydro-
whether he or she is taking any prescribed medication; if chlorothiazide 12.5 mg that was prescribed for
so, is the patient taking it appropriately? Has the patient him at the last office visit 2 weeks ago. He states,
instituted recommended lifestyle changes? Is the patient “I feel fine. I don’t need to take any medicine.” He
getting diagnostic tests done or going to therapy? Has deniesAuthor
chest pain, shor tness ISBN # of breath, Author's swelling
review
the patient consulted and followed up with the specialist? Sullivan
in theFig.
feet or ankles, 6662
visual changes,
(if needed)
or headache. OK Correx
After exploring these considerations, try to ascertain the He has
#
been counseled
Document name
on smoking cessation Date
F08_04 6662_C_F08_04.eps
patient’s understanding of the ramifications of noncom- but c ontinues
Artist to smoke Initials
Datea pack of cigarettes daily.
pliance. If the patient simply refuses to follow treatment AB
At the last visit, I recommended
03/06/18
Check if revision that he review
Editor's tr y to
recommendations, even when he or she understands e xercise
B / W 20 to 30 minutes 32nddays of the week,OKbutCorrex
color
X
the potential consequences of not following treatment, he hasFinalnot
4/C
(WidthiX
Size yet nitiated
2/C PMS
any exercise. His mother
Depth in Picas)
then the patient is considered to be noncompliant. You died of41p0 x 27p10at age 59, and his father
a stroke
Initials
died
Date
must document—in detail—the information discussed at age 51 from a myocardial infarction. He has a
with the patient, including the potential consequences younger brother with hyper tension that is con-
of continued noncompliance, as well as the patient’s re- trolled with medication.
sponse. “Noncompliance” should be documented in the O: M r. Graham is a well-developed, obese man,
assessment and on the problem list. The ICD-10 code NAD. He appears agitated.
Z91.19 may be used for noncompliance with medical VSHt: 6 ft 2 in.; Wt: 265 lb; BP right 168/102, left
treatment. Be sure to document in the plan portion any 172/104; T 98.2 orally; pulse is 94 and regular ;
advice or education that you provided. Example 8.1 r espirations 20 per minute.
demonstrates one way to document a noncompliance note.
Vernon Scott, MD
2000 Oak Street, Suite 311
Phoenix, AZ 85005
602-537-2000
Michael W. Bennett, MD
Southwest Gastrointestinal Specialty Group
5700 E. VanHorn St., Suite 25
Phoenix, AZ 85002
Thank you for agreeing to see Mr. William R. Jensen. Mr. Jensen is a pleasant 67-year-old man who is a new patient to my practice.
He presented to my office with complaints of fatigue and feeling weak. He also gave a history of a 10-pound unintentional weight
loss over the past 2 months. His PMH is significant for hypertension and dyslipidemia, which have been stable with medical
management. He is presently taking Lotensin HCT 20/12.5 once daily and Mevacor 20 mg once daily. He is allergic to penicillin,
which gives him a rash. During workup at my office, he was found to have hemoccult-positive stools. His WBC is 5.8 and H&H 13
and 46. There is a family history of breast cancer. Mr. Jensen has had one colonoscopy approximately 15 years ago and no
screening since.
Considering the fatigue, weight loss, and hemoccult-positive stool, I recommended to Mr. Jensen that he undergo colonoscopy with
biopsy. He is scheduled to see you within the next 2 weeks. I have enclosed a copy of his CBC, CMP, and ECG for your review.
Should you need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Vernon Scott, MD
Encl: 3
Michael W. Bennett, MD
Southwest Gastrointestinal Specialty Group
5700 E. VanHorn St., Suite 25
Phoenix, AZ 85002
Vernon Scott, MD
2000 Oak Street, Suite 311
Phoenix, AZ 85005
It was a pleasure to see Mr. William Jensen for consultation regarding his weight loss and fatigue. Prior to the colonoscopy, Mr.
Jensen sent in three stool sample cards, two of which were positive for blood. A colonoscopy was performed at the outpatient
surgical center; he tolerated the procedure well. GI prep was adequate. Several suspicious polypoid lesions were visualized at the
hepatic flexure area. Multiple biopsies were obtained, and there were no complications.
The pathology report confirms the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon. I met with Mr. Jensen and his wife yesterday to discuss
the diagnosis and usual course of surgical management. I recommended that he see Dr. David Sanders for more information on the
various surgical approaches. Mr. Jensen was agreeable with this and will call for an appointment.
I have enclosed a copy of the pathology report for your records. Thank you for allowing me to participate in the care of this patient. If
he elects surgery, I would be happy to follow him with you. Please call me if any questions.
Respectfully,
Michael W. Bennett, MD
Encl: 1
for medical advice or are a means of providing other Each practice should develop protocols identifying
information, such as results of diagnostic tests. There- which calls must be directed to a health-care provider
fore, the conversation that occurs by telephone is still immediately, which calls may be returned later, and
an important part of the patient–provider relationship which calls may be handled by another professional
and, as such, is subject to documentation in much the or office staff. If members of the professional staff
same way as other medical visits. Medicare and many are authorized to give telephone advice, there should
private insurers do not reimburse for telephonic com- be written protocols to define the scope of the staff
munications. Some third-party payers will pay if the member’s authority to give such advice to minimize
calls are coded properly. A billable call can be initiated the likelihood of staff practicing medicine without a
only by an established patient or the patient’s guardian. license and outside their scope of training.
The conversation cannot be related to a face-to-face Some practices use a telephone call log to document
appointment that occurred within the past week or will every call. If used, such logs should be retained as long
happen within the next 24 hours or the next earliest as medical records are retained. Others may use spe-
available appointment. In other words, the call has to cific forms, such as the one shown in Figure 8-7, for
substitute for in-office care. The relevant Current Pro- documenting telephone calls. Regardless of how the
cedural Terminology (CPT) codes, which reflect the documentation is done, the same information should
number of minutes of medical discussion, for physicians be documented consistently. This includes the date
are 99441 (5 to 10 minutes), 99442 (11 to 20 minutes), and time of the call, patient’s name, name of caller and
and 99443 (21 to 30 minutes). The comparable codes relationship to the patient, the complaint, advice given,
for care provided by other health professionals are follow-up plan, and disposition. Be sure the advice
98966, 98967, and 98968. To increase the likelihood of is documented in detail, and, ideally, you should ask
payment, you must document the call like an in-person the caller to repeat it so you can verify that the caller
visit with notation of the time spent (Torrey, 2017). understood
Author the advice given.
ISBNFailure
# toAuthor's
documentreview may
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
Copyright © 2019 by6662_C_F08_06.eps
F08_06 F. A. Davis Company. AllInitials
rights reserved.
Date
Artist Date
04/05/18
AB/CO Editor's review
Check if revision X
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 28p4 Initials
Caller/Relationship: _________________________________________________________________________________________
HPI/PMH: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Medications: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Allergies: __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Diagnosis: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
Recommendations/Rx: _______________________________________________________________________________________
Disposition: ________________________________________________________________________________________________
Follow-up: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Billing:
lead to liability related to failure to diagnose, delay of communication. Like other modes of communication,
treatment, improper treatment, failure to follow up, there are advantages and disadvantages to using e-mail.
and breach of confidentiality.
If you attempt to reach a patient by telephone but are Benefits of E-mail
unable to do so, document your attempts, including the One of the greatest advantages is the convenience for
date and time of each attempt. Before leaving messages patients and providers. A patient can send an e-mail
on an answering machine or with someone other than and receive a response without staying on hold or wait-
the patient, ensure that consent has been obtained from ing by the telephone. Patients believe that requesting
the patient. The consent should indicate specifically if prescription refills, obtaining routine test results, and
and with whom messages may be left. Document in the scheduling appointments by e-mail saves time (Rajecki,
patient’s record that a message was left. Never leave clinical 2009). Zhou and colleagues (2007) found that the use of
information or advice as a voice message; instead, leave e-mail and electronic messaging decreased the amount
your name and a telephone number and request a call back. of time that providers spent on the telephone. Another
advantage is that e-mail creates a documentation trail
Electronic Mail that can be used to record activity and conversation,
Telephone communication between health-care provider providing a transcript of all that is said and not said,
and patient is not without its frustrations. Providers often in an electronic format.
view calls as unnecessary interruptions. Patients express
frustration that they may have to wait to receive a call Concerns Regarding E-mail
back from the provider. Several studies have shown that There are perceived and real disadvantages to using
patients would prefer communicating with providers by e-mail. One of the disadvantages that is cited most
electronic mail (e-mail); in one study (Stouffer, 2008), frequently is related to revenue. A study at one large
90% of respondents wanted their providers to use e-mail health maintenance
Author organization
ISBN # (HMO) reported a
Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved. F08_07 6662_C_F08_07.eps
Initials
Date
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 28p1 Initials
decrease in annual office visit rates among patients who Many providers have concerns about potential legal
had online access to their provider (Zhou et al, 2007). problems. E-mails are still provider–patient commu-
A decrease in office visits could mean decreased income nication and are discoverable—even deleted ones.
for the provider because office visits are billable visits. Only A poorly written e-mail may be used to portray you as
a few private insurance plans reimburse the provider for unprofessional. Before sending a message, be sure to
“e-visits” or “virtual visits” conducted by e-mail. Accord- double-check your e-mails for accuracy and appropriate
ing to the American Health Information Management language. Flippant or humorous messages may look
Association (AHIMA), the lack of reimbursement from disrespectful when viewed later, out of context.
Medicare is a limiting factor in the number of providers Other concerns about the use of e-mail have been
using e-mail. If the Medicare policy were to change, it identified. Providers may fear being bombarded by e-mails
is likely that e-mail communications between provider or having patients abuse the privilege. It may be difficult
and patient would increase. Medicare does reimburse to confirm the identity of the patient in an e-mail request.
for some live telemedicine services, not just electronic Messages can be delayed by hours or even days, and not
communications, and specific criteria must be met for receiving a response in a timely manner may have adverse
the visit to be reimbursable. Patients must be physically health consequences. Patients may e-mail about multiple
present at qualifying clinical sites, which must be in an complaints or problems. Viruses may be transmitted
area defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid through attachments that may cause serious damage to
Services (CMS) as rural and underserved, a definition computer systems. Patients may come to expect a quick
that excludes as many as 80% of Medicare beneficiaries response to e-mail. Limiting e-mails to English only
( Joseph and Stuhan, 2015). More information about may cause problems for patients with limited English
the criteria for telemedicine visits is available at www proficiency. A certain level of patient literacy is required
.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learn- for the e-mail exchange to be beneficial and efficient.
ing-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/Tele-
health-Services-Text-Only.pdf. Currently, all but three Provisions for Using E-mail
state Medicaid programs pay for virtual visits, although If the decision is made to communicate with patients by
different states have different requirements for what e-mail, specific actions must be taken. Obtain written
types of services can be provided under virtual visits and permission from patients to communicate with them by
where. However, because Medicaid is administered in e-mail. Set expectations and limitations with patients
a state-by-state manner, no two programs are identical about what they can e-mail and how long it will take
in terms of coverage. to respond. Develop policies for the use of e-mail, in-
Confidentiality and protected health information (PHI) cluding how e-mail messages will be incorporated into
are other concerns with e-mail or electronic messaging. the patient’s medical record. Most EMR systems have a
State and federal laws vary when it comes to patient feature that will archive e-mails in the patient’s record.
privacy, particularly for patient conditions such as sexu- If this feature is not available, or if an EMR system is
ally transmitted diseases (STDs), HIV, substance abuse, not used, e-mails should be printed and saved in the
and treatment for mental health conditions. Laws about patient’s medical record. Provider–patient e-mails are
e-mailing patients who seek care for these conditions are considered health-care organization business records
very stringent and may cause confusion for providers. and, therefore, are subject to the same provisions for
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act storage, retention, retrieval, privacy, and security and
(HIPAA) requires that electronic PHI, including e-mail, confidentiality as any other patient-identifiable health
be communicated in a secure way, that is, through an information. Confirm that you have the correct e-mail
encrypted system. There are many commercial services address for the intended recipient. Ensure that PHI
available that provide encrypted communication, but sent by e-mail is encrypted with access provided only
providers may be unwilling to pay for these services. In to authorized individuals who have an access code. Add
addition, patients may be unwilling to use encryption a confidentiality disclaimer to e-mail messages that
services to communicate with providers when their states the content is confidential and intended only for
unencrypted e-mail system is quick and simple to use. the stated recipient. The disclaimer also should state
Safeguarding the confidentiality of e-mail messages is that anyone receiving the e-mail in error must notify
difficult. Confidentiality can be breached by outsiders the sender and return or destroy the e-mail as per the
(hackers) or by patients and providers themselves who request of the sender. Never use e-mail distribution
reply to or forward e-mails to individuals outside the lists to send personal information.
patient–provider relationship. E-mails may be intercepted, For those providers who choose to utilize e-mail, you
altered, or delivered to the wrong address, resulting in can follow the American Medical Association’s Guidelines
people other than the intended recipients having access for Patient-Physician Electronic Mail (Policy H-478.997;
to the e-mail communication. 2012). The American College of Physicians (ACP)
and the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) Patients often use the Internet and social media sites
Special Committee on Ethics and Professionalism to educate themselves about medical conditions and
developed a position paper that examines and provides treatment options. Information obtained from websites
recommendations about use of e-mail and other Web- may have tremendous influence on patients, whether or
based communication platforms. The consensus is that not that information is credible or supported by medical
e-mail is best used as an extension of the patient–provider research. A portion of the medical encounter may be
relationship and not a replacement for the relationship. spent discussing information that the patient brings
Finally, be sure you are familiar with and follow state to the visit, especially when you may have to educate
laws governing the use of e-mail communications. patients on the inaccuracy of information.
Sites devoted to specific diseases or conditions, from
Patient Portal asthma to Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, are plentiful.
A patient portal is a secure online Web-based platform Patients may access educational material, connect
that gives patients convenient 24-hour access to their with other people with the same condition, and find
own or a family member’s health information and providers who specialize in treating their condition. As
EMRs from anywhere with an Internet connection. a provider, you may find medical websites helpful to
Also, patient portals offer self-service options that can obtain clinical information about diseases, participate
eliminate “phone tag” with the health-care provider. The in continuing education programs, and collaborate
features of patient portals vary, but typically patients can with other providers across the country and around the
schedule appointments; request medication refills; and world. Although Web-based platforms continue to be
securely view and print portions of their medical record, used in these “traditional” ways, they are increasingly
including visit notes, discharge summaries, medications, used as a means of social networking.
immunizations, allergies, and most laboratory results. Social media sites, such as Facebook, Twitter, and
Other features may include downloading or completing Google Plus, have evolved from a preoccupation of high
intake forms, exchanging secure e-mail with members school and college students to the mainstream of social
of the health-care team, checking benefits and coverage, interaction that spans divisions of age, profession, and
updating contact information, and making payments. socioeconomic status. Several provider-only sites, such
Sometimes the patient portal can be used to send ap- as Sermo, Ozmosis, PA-CLife, and Nurse LinkUp,
pointment reminders to patients and to identify and offer providers the chance to connect with others in
provide patient-specific educational resources. Many their profession for knowledge sharing, networking,
hospitals offer patient portals similar to those used in and support. Access to these sites is controlled so that
ambulatory care settings. Some hospital systems also providers are able to share opinions and interact in a
offer a platform where patients (or their representative) safe, guarded environment. Providers may be required
can update friends and family about their health status. to disclose their name and credentials, preventing users
Patients also may use the portal to find a health-care from hiding behind a cloak of anonymity. Registered
provider or enroll in educational classes. users of many online medical communities can flag
information they believe is inappropriate, which en-
hances the quality of the information posted on the site.
Social Media Although these types of professional sites are growing
in number and popularity, many providers are also turning
Benefits of Social Media to social media for professional reasons or networking.
Social media refers broadly to Web-based tools that allow Hospitals and health-care systems use social media to
individuals to communicate quickly, easily, and broadly. communicate with colleagues and patients. A 2014 study
Many health-care organizations are using social media reported that more than 3,000 hospitals have accounts
to engage with patients and consumers. Health-care on at least one social media site, and approximately half
organizations also use social media to communicate their of all U.S. hospitals have an account on at least four
mission and vision, describe the services they offer, and sites. A number of hospitals have blogs authored by the
provide health education. Some organizations use social chief executive officer in an effort to personalize their
media to promote wellness and sponsor online support message. Proponents of social networking cite benefits,
forums where individuals who are dealing with chronic such as an increased presence in the community, the
health issues or catastrophic conditions can find support ability to promote certain services, and marketing to
from others who are having similar experiences. On attract new patients. Others indicate that the use of social
some sites, physicians and other clinicians educate the networking offers a way to stay abreast of medical news,
public on common diseases, what can be done to cope share practice management tips, and build consensus
with conditions, and how to maximize the quality of on issues important to them. The ease of facilitating
life for the individual who is suffering from the disease. communication is also an advantage, particularly when
communicating findings from research. New findings Provisions for Using Social Media
can be disseminated through social media the minute Social media is likely here to stay. Health-care pro-
they are learned, putting useful information in the fessionals need to carefully consider whether to have
hands of clinicians more quickly than the traditional a presence on social media. If the decision is made to
dissemination through professional journals or meet- do so, it is recommended that separate sites be used
ings. Often clinical research is sponsored by industry, for professional and personal purposes to maintain ap-
and few people may evaluate the content before it is propriate boundaries. A position paper from the ACP
published in a journal. In an online community, review and FSMB published in 2016 examines and provides
by potentially thousands of professionals may promote recommendations about the influence of social media
superior credibility. on the patient–provider relationship, the role of these
media in public perception of physician behaviors, and
Concerns About Social Media strategies for provider–patient communication that pre-
Despite the benefits of social media, there are also con- serve confidentiality while best using these technologies.
cerns and challenges. Perhaps the greatest concern—and On any site to which patients have access, a disclaimer
the reason to include the topic of social media in a text should be used to state clearly that the provider is not
on documentation—is the permanence of information giving medical advice to individuals. Guidelines for
posted on sites. Of equal concern is that there is no postings should be established, as should guidelines for
anonymity on the Web. Information posted on most dealing with “friend” requests. The FSMB specifically
social media sites is indexed on Google and can be found discourages physicians from interacting with current
by patients, supervisors, potential employers, attorneys, or past patients on personal social networking sites.
and others. Even when information is removed from a Students in professional programs and licensed pro-
site, it is usually archived somewhere and accessible in viders should take extra precautions to ensure that they
the future. Lawsuits have been filed against physicians are not in violation of policies of the school, employer,
and other health-care providers for posting photographs or professional liability carrier or the ethics codes of a
of patients without their consent. Before posting in- hospital or professional society. Remember that social
formation on a social site, health-care providers should media sites are not HIPAA-compliant and should
consider how the content would likely be interpreted never be used for any patient–provider communication.
in various settings, such as an interview, a departmental By applying these commonsense principles, provid-
meeting, or during litigation. The information, whether ers should be able to realize the benefits and protect
in written form or photographs, should be considered themselves from the perils of social networking.
permanent documentation that can be accessed by
anyone at any time. The tourism industry in Las Vegas
launched a successful campaign based on the idea that Summary
“what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.” Health-care
providers who have a presence on social media should In addition to SOAP notes, you may use other forms
operate on the premise that “what happens in Vegas of documentation, such as problem lists, medication
shows up on the Internet the rest of your life.” lists, and flow sheets, to document a patient’s medical
Another concern related to social media is the potential information. Correspondence between medical providers
to breach patient confidentiality. Even with the best of should be incorporated into the patient’s medical record.
intentions, it is easy to divulge PHI when posting a case Demographic and billing information may be kept in
and seeking input from colleagues. Any information the patient record, often in a section that is separate
that is shared should be generic enough that no one from medical information. If you or your institution
can identify a patient in the course of reading a post. decides to allow e-mail between patients and providers,
Another challenge is the blurring of the boundaries of all e-mails should be made a permanent part of the
the patient–provider relationship and the merging of patient record. EMRs and Web-based patient portal
professional and personal lives. Providers must decide platforms will have a system design that promotes security
whether they will accept a request from patients to of protected health information and that captures who
engage in a social media relationship. Although many accesses the patient’s record. Health-care providers and
websites allow users to choose privacy settings and to institutions should develop and prominently display
control which personal content is available to whom, procedures and guidelines for use of e-mail or patient
once information is posted on social media, there is portals, and they must have policies that deal with se-
no longer any control over that information. Providers curity breaches. To reinforce the content of this chapter,
also should realize that information could be posted on please complete the worksheets that follow. And be sure
other sites and could be viewed as providing medical to review Appendix A, the Document Library, for full
advice, resulting in a liability risk. case examples of patient documentation.
Name:
Review
1. In addition to a SOAP note, identify at least four types of documentation that could be kept in a patient’s
medical record.
3. Figure 8-3 shows a flow sheet used to track information for a patient who is on anticoagulation therapy.
Identify at least three other conditions for which a flow sheet might be used and the information that
could be included.
4. Identify at least four components of a telephone call that should be documented and placed in the pa-
tient’s medical record.
7. Identify three benefits that providers, hospitals, or health systems can realize with social media.
8. List three concerns related to providers having a presence on social networking sites.
9. Identify at least three recommendations to providers who choose to have a presence on a social network-
ing site.
Name:
Name:
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 8. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the context
of this chapter.
ACP ACE
AHIMA CMS
CPT ECG
EMR FSMB
HIPAA HMO
HPI ICD
INR OTC
PHI PMH
PT SSN
STD
195
to handwrite prescriptions and those who adopted registered, or otherwise permitted, by the United States
electronic prescribing (or e-prescribing). At the end or the jurisdiction in which the practitioner practices
of the study, there was no significant rate of change or performs research, to distribute, dispense, conduct
statistically among errors in paper-based prescriptions. research with respect to, administer, or use in teaching
In the e-prescribing group, error rates decreased nearly or chemical analysis a controlled substance in the course
sevenfold from 42.5 per 100 prescriptions to 6.6 per of professional practice or research.”
100 prescriptions. Illegibility errors were completely Every person or entity that handles controlled sub-
eliminated. E-prescribing is discussed in detail later in stances must be registered with the DEA or be exempt
this chapter. However, before looking at e-prescribing, it by regulation from registration. The DEA registration
is necessary to understand the basic concepts related to grants practitioners federal authority to handle controlled
prescribing, such as the role of the Drug Enforcement substances. The registration is used to track practitioners’
Agency (DEA), state and federal laws that govern pre- prescribing practices related to controlled substances and
scribing authority, and controlled versus noncontrolled to control the unauthorized prescribing of controlled
substances. Likewise, a prescriber must understand the substances. Each qualified practitioner is assigned a unique
elements that are required in a prescription regardless DEA identifier number. A prescription for a controlled
of the means by which the prescription is generated. substance that does not have an authorized DEA number
on it cannot be filled. The DEA provides a practitioner’s
manual to assist prescribers in understanding their re-
Federal and State Regulations sponsibilities under the CSA and to provide guidance
in complying with federal regulations. The manual may
and Prescribing Authority be found at the DEA’s website at www.DEAdiversion.
usdoj.gov. Any DEA-registered practitioner may engage
The DEA was established in 1973 to serve as the pri- in only those activities that are authorized under state
mary federal agency responsible for the enforcement of law for the jurisdiction in which the practice is located.
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The CSA sets When federal law or regulations differ from state law
forth the federal law regarding both illicit and lawful or regulations, the practitioner is required to abide by
(pharmaceutical) controlled substances. With respect to the more stringent aspects of both the federal and state
pharmaceutical controlled substances, the DEA’s statutory requirements. In many cases, state law is more stringent
responsibility is twofold: to prevent diversion and abuse of than federal law and must be complied with in addi-
these drugs while ensuring that an adequate and uninter- tion to federal law. If a state requires a separate license
rupted supply is available to meet the country’s legitimate for controlled substances, then it should be obtained
medical, scientific, and research needs. In carrying out this first and should be included in the federal application.
mission, the DEA works in close cooperation with state Practitioners should be certain that they understand the
and local authorities and other federal agencies. regulations from their state as well as the DEA related
Under the framework of the CSA, the DEA is to controlled substances. DEA regulations prohibit a
responsible for ensuring that all transactions related physician from delegating the use of his or her signature
to controlled substances take place within the “closed and DEA registration to another person. Therefore, if
system” of distribution established by Congress. Under a nonphysician provider is delegated the authority to
this closed system, all legitimate handlers of controlled prescribe controlled substances, then the provider also
substances—manufacturers, distributors, practitioners, must be registered with the DEA. Prescribing authority
pharmacies, and researchers—must be registered for both physician assistants and nurse practitioners by
with the DEA and maintain strict accounting for all state may be viewed at www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/
distributions. Under the CSA, the term practitioner is drugreg/practioners/mlp_by_state.pdf.
defined as “a physician, dentist, veterinarian, scientific Use the practitioner’s manual from the DEA to
investigator, pharmacy, hospital, or other person licensed, answer the questions in Application Exercise 9.1.
Using the information found on the DEA website, identify the prescribing limits for Percocet tablets by a
physician assistant practicing in Montana.
Using the information found on the DEA website, determine the maximum number of Percocet tablets that
may be prescribed by a nurse practitioner practicing in Michigan.
corresponding responsibility rests with the phar- Table 9-1 Drug Enforcement Agency
macist who dispenses the prescription to ensure Classification of Controlled
the accuracy of the prescription. Substances*
• Contact the nearest DEA field office to obtain or
furnish information regarding suspicious prescrip- Schedule Comments
tion activities. I High potential for abuse. No accepted
• Do not include your DEA number on preprinted medical use.
prescription blanks. Instead, leave a blank line II High potential for abuse. Use may lead
to severe physical or psychological
and write in the number only when required for a dependence.
controlled substance. III Some potential for abuse. Use may lead
• Keep an inventory of the number of prescrip- to low to moderate physical dependence
tion pads you have on hand, making it easier to or psychological dependence.
identify whether pads are missing. IV Low potential for abuse. Use may lead
• Do not use your DEA number as an identifier if to limited physical or psychological
there is another option (such as a National P rovider dependence.
Identifier [NPI] number). Using your DEA num- V Subject to state and local regulations.
Abuse potential is low.
ber for identification increases the risk of misuse
and the possibility of forged prescriptions. *As in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Drugs are categorized
according to their potential for abuse: the greater the potential, the more
• Do not display your DEA certificate. File it in a severe the limitations on their prescription.
locked cabinet.
• Limit the number of people who have access to
your DEA number. Instruct office staff to refer all • Patient identification
requests for your DEA number directly to you. • The inscription
• The subscription
• Signa
Controlled and Noncontrolled • Indication
• Refill information
Substances • Generic substitution
• Warnings
The drugs and other substances that are considered • Container information
controlled substances under the CSA are divided into • Prescriber’s signature
five schedules. A complete list of the schedules is up- A summary of these elements is shown in Table 9-2.
dated and published annually in the DEA regulations,
Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Sections
1308.11 through 1308.15. Substances are placed in
their respective schedules based on whether they have Writing Prescriptions for
a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States and on their relative potential for abuse
Noncontrolled Medications
and likelihood of causing dependence when abused. Prescriber Identification
All drugs listed in Schedule I have no currently accepted In many cases, this is preprinted on a standard prescription
medical use and, therefore, may not be p rescribed, admin- form. This includes the name and title of the prescriber
istered, or dispensed for medical use. In contrast, drugs and the address and telephone number of the practice
listed in Schedules II through V all have some accepted or institution. When the prescriber is a nonphysician,
medical use and, therefore, may be prescribed, adminis- some states require that the supervising physician’s name
tered, or dispensed. Table 9-1 presents the categories of be printed on the prescription form as well.
controlled substances as defined by the CSA.
Patient Identification
This includes the patient’s name, address, age or date of
Elements of a Prescription birth, and, sometimes, weight. It is recommended and,
in some states it is required, that you use the patient’s
Certain elements should be included in every prescrip- legal name instead of a nickname. If you are unsure of
tion, whether it is for a noncontrolled or a controlled the patient’s legal name, ask to see a driver’s license or
substance. The basic elements include the following: an insurance card if available. This helps avoid confusion
• Date the prescription was written and correctly identifies the patient. The date of birth
• Prescriber identification is more commonly requested than the patient’s age
because it allows more specific identification. When a on how the quantity should be written and refill
prescription is written for a pediatric patient, you should information, so it is recommended that you ask the
include the patient’s weight so that the pharmacist can patient whether he or she uses a mail-order service
verify that the medication has been dosed appropriately. before writing the prescription.
Inscription Signa or sig
This includes the name and strength of the medication. This provides instructions to the patient on how to take
Generic or trade names may be used. Avoid abbreviating the medication and should be as specific as possible. It
names of medications to help reduce the possibility of should include the route; any special instructions, such
error. There are exceptions for well-known medications; as to take on an empty stomach or take with food; and how
for instance, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is commonly often to take. When the medication is prescribed on a
abbreviated TMP/SMX. The strength is the amount per prn basis, the reason for taking the medication should be
dosing unit, such as a 50 mg tablet or 250 mg per 5 mL. included. Avoid writing vague or ambiguous instructions,
Some medications come in many different strengths and such as take as directed or apply in usual manner. Numerous
forms (i.e., tablets and liquids). If you are unsure which studies have documented that patients usually do not
strengths and forms are available, you should consult a pre- remember all the information they are given during the
scribing guide, pharmacology text, or medication reference course of a provider–patient encounter; therefore, it is
book. The strength is not the same as the total amount to necessary to provide instructions that are as detailed
be taken by the patient over the course of the prescription. and accurate as possible to reduce the chance that the
medication may be taken inappropriately.
Subscription
This provides information to the pharmacist on dos- Indication
age form and number of units or doses to dispense. Including the indication for the prescription is mandatory
Instructions about the dosage form may be tablets, in some states. Even when states do not require an indica-
capsules, or suspension, for example. If a liquid or tion, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP)
semiliquid is to be dispensed, provide the quantity, recommends including it for two reasons. First, many drugs
such as how many milliliters of suspension or how have names that look and sound alike but are taken for
many grams in a tube. The amount dispensed should very different reasons. Second, illegible writing may cause
be the amount needed to complete a course of treat- confusion or misinterpretation. Including the indication
ment. For example, if a patient is to take a tablet for the prescribed medication provides another safety
twice a day for 10 days, the subscription, or amount check for the prescriber, the pharmacist, and the patient.
to dispense, would be 20 tablets. You will often see
“#20” or “Disp: 20 tabs”; either is acceptable. Many Refill Information
patients use a mail-order pharmacy service provided This should be included on the prescription form and
by their health insurance plan administrator. Such can be written as the number of times a prescription
mail-order pharmacies may have specific requirements may be refilled or a period during which the prescription
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
may be refilled. Most states impose a 1-year maximal The National Coordinating Council for Medication
refill period. Patients taking medications for chronic Error Reporting and Prevention has identified several
conditions should be assessed at least annually, so it abbreviations that are particularly dangerous because they
is not prudent to write medication refills for more have been misunderstood consistently. These abbrevia-
than a 1-year period. If the patient has prescription tions are shown in Table 9-4. The council recommends
coverage as a benefit of an insurance plan, it is a that these should never be used in prescription writing.
good idea to consult the formulary for that insurance Refer to Appendix C for the ISMP list of Error-Prone
company to see whether the medication you want to Abbreviations, Symbols, and Dose Designations that
prescribe is covered and whether there are regulations should be avoided when writing prescriptions.
about how many can be dispensed in a certain period.
Many companies will cover only a 1-month supply of
medication at a time. It is usually of monetary benefit Writing Prescriptions for
to the patient if he or she is prescribed a medication
that is covered by the insurance plan, but that is not Controlled Medications
the only factor to consider when deciding which
medication to prescribe. Two main differences between noncontrolled and
controlled medications are the quantity initially dis-
Generic Substitution pensed and the refills. State laws regulate the quantity
Most prescription forms will allow you to indicate of controlled medications that can be prescribed during
whether the medication should be dispensed as written a certain period. When indicating the quantity, write
(DAW) or whether substitution of a generic form of the out the number instead of writing it numerically (“ten”
medication is permitted. Generic medications usually instead of “10”), or do both. An example is shown in
offer considerable cost savings to the patient, and, with Figure 9-3. This helps prevent modification of the
few exceptions, it is preferable to allow substitution. prescription. State laws also regulate the number of
refills, if any, allowed for controlled substances. It is your
Warnings responsibility as a prescriber to know these regulations.
When you write the prescription, you should specify
what, if any, warning labels should be attached to the
medication package or vial. In most instances, the MEDICOLEGAL ALERT !
pharmacist filling the prescription will affix the appro-
priate warnings listed in the prescribing information According to some studies, up to 25% of ambulatory
automatically, but you should include this information patients experience adverse medication events. Up to
on the form. This provides another safety check between 6% of these adverse events could have been reduced or
the prescriber and the pharmacist. prevented altogether. Many preventable events involve
Container Information prescribing a medication to which the patient has a
known allergy. Before writing any new prescription for
In many states, the law requires that pharmacists a patient, always ask about allergies to any medications,
dispense medications in childproof containers. If and prescribe accordingly. Sometimes, when asked about
the patient taking the medication is likely to have medication allergies, patients may describe what sounds
difficulty opening such a container (such as a patient like side effects of a medication rather than describing a
with arthritic hands), indicate that a non-childproof true allergic reaction. If you have any doubt whether a
container should be used. patient is truly allergic to a medication, discuss the risk
Signature and benefits of taking the medication with the patient,
and document that discussion. If the decision is made to
Your signature authenticates the prescription. On a
prescribe the medication, be sure that the patient knows
prescription form, your signature should include your
what signs or symptoms to be aware of and what action
name and title. Signatures can be unique and may
to take should any develop. You should always consider
identify people, much like fingerprints, but above all
what medications the patient is already taking and
they should be legible. Figure 9-2 shows a completed
determine the likelihood of drug interactions. Some-
prescription with all the elements labeled.
times, the benefit of prescribing a specific medication
Although frequently used when writing the i nstructions,
may outweigh the possible risk for a drug interaction
there is controversy about whether abbreviations should
or side effect; document in such a way that reflects that
be used at all. A list of commonly used abbreviations is
you are aware of possible side effects or drug inter-
shown in Table 9-3. Some providers and pharmacists
actions but that you believe the medication to be the
think that writing out instructions, rather than using
most appropriate treatment for the patient’s condition.
abbreviations, reduces the chance of a medication error.
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
-DQH6PLWK
Name: ______________________________________________________________
Age: ___________________________
2
1UG$YH3HRULD
Address: _____________________________________________________________ ;;;;;;;;
Date: ___________________________
3 $XJPHQWLQPJWDEOHWV
4 'LVSHQVH
5+6 6LJ7DNHRQHE\PRXWKWZLFHGDLO\IRUGD\VIRULQIHFWLRQ
7 + 10
Refill ______ times Childproof Container: yes [ no
______________________________________________ 'HEELH6XOOLYDQ3$&
_____________________________________________
8 + 11
between number to dispense (14) and frequency and manager, or health plan, either directly or through an
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas)
Initials
23p2 x 10p8
number of days to take (twice a day for 10 days = 20). intermediary, including an e-prescribing network.
The prescription for Lantus is meant to be 8 (eight) E-prescribing includes, but is not limited to, two-way
units but could easily be mistaken for 80 (eighty) units. transmissions between the point of care and the dispenser.
Federal Initiatives for Electronic 2. Eligibility and benefits queries and responses be-
Prescribing tween prescribers and Part D sponsors
3. Eligibility queries between dispensers and Part
Since early 2000, many federal and state organi-
D sponsors
zations have called for the adoption of a national
electronic-prescribing system. Several key federal MMA also required CMS to implement pilot projects
regulations include provisions or mandates related to to test additional standards related to formulary and
e-prescribing. Passage of the Medicare Modernization benefit information, prior authorization, medication
Act of 2003 (MMA) resulted in a significant increase in history, and fill status notification. These are all import-
attention and focus on e-prescribing. One component ant components of an electronic prescribing system,
of the MMA was Medicare Part D, which introduced especially one that could be implemented nationally.
an entitlement benefit for prescription drug coverage In 2007, electronic prescribing became legal in all
for Medicare beneficiaries. Under the Part D program, 50 states. Congress passed the Medicare Improvements
the MMA mandates that plans accept electronic for Patients and Providers Act in 2008. The act pro-
prescriptions; it authorizes the Department of Health vided for a 2% annual bonus for providers who started
and Human Services to mandate transactive standards; e-prescribing and penalties for those who did not. The
and it provides economic incentives to prescribers for incentive program ended in 2013.
the adoption of e-prescribing. A report released by the
Institute of Medicine in July 2006, Preventing Medication Qualified Electronic Prescribing
Errors, received widespread publicity and helped build Similar to the “meaningful use” standard imposed on
awareness of e-prescribing’s role in enhancing patient EMR adopters, criteria have also been developed for
safety. In the same year, CMS enacted three foundation “qualified e-prescribing.” To qualify, a system must be
standards that apply to all electronic prescribing done capable of all of the following:
under Part D of the MMA. The foundation standards
• Generating a complete active medication list in-
cover three broad areas:
corporating electronic data received from applica-
1. Transactions between prescribers and dispensers ble pharmacy drug plans if available
for new prescriptions, refill requests, prescription • Selecting medications, printing prescriptions,
changes and/or cancellations, and related mes- electronically transmitting prescriptions, and con-
saging and administrative transactions ducting all safety checks
%UHQGD&DUWZULJKW
Name: ________________________________________________________________
Age: ____________________________
:'XSRQW6W3KRHQL[
Address: ______________________________________________________________ ;;;;
Date: ____________________________
+\GURFRGRQH7DEOHWVPJ
'LVSWHQ
6LJ7DNHRQHWDEOHWE\PRXWKHYHU\KUVDVQHHGHGIRUSDLQ
Refill ______ times Childproof Container: [ yes no
__________________________________________________ 'HEELH6XOOLYDQ3$&
_________________________________________________
Support System (CDSS) helps prescribers make informed mandate it. They also permit pharmacies to receive,
decisions about which medication is most effective. dispense, and archive these electronic prescriptions.
E-prescribing brings automation of the entire pre- Practitioners who wish to prescribe controlled sub-
scribing process. New prescriptions go directly to the stances electronically must obtain a third-party audit or
pharmacy’s computer, and renewal requests come back certification to certify that each electronic prescription
to the prescriber’s e-prescribing and EMR application and pharmacy application to be used to sign, transmit,
for authorization. This creates a closed system that or process prescriptions for controlled substances com-
prevents prescription tampering and fraud. It also elim- plies with DEA regulations pertaining to electronic
inates handwritten prescriptions and errors related to prescriptions for controlled substances. E-prescribing
illegibility and transcribing and data entry. It decreases software must be upgraded to meet standards set
the amount of time spent on telephone calls from dis- by the FDA. Providers must go through an identity
pensers to prescribers for queries related to illegibility, proofing process involving two-factor authentication
noncovered drugs, and prior authorization requirements. (TFA) credentials. DEA allows the use of two of the
This allows prescribers to spend more time providing following: something you know (a knowledge factor),
patient care and results in cost savings to pharmacies something you have (a hard token stored separately
and payers. E-prescribing may also increase patient from the computer being accessed), and something
compliance because of cost-effectiveness, convenience, you are (biometric information, such as a fingerprint
and a decrease in the total time it takes from generation screen). As of early 2017, only around 4% of prescribers
of a prescription to dispensing of a medication. nationwide were engaged in EPCS. More information
on the ruling may be obtained at the DEA website:
Barriers to E-Prescribing www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/ecomm/e_rx/index.html.
Many of the potential barriers associated with electronic The Office of the National Certification for Health
prescribing are the same as those for using an EMR Information Technology released a report in July 2014
system. Cost can be an issue to both prescribers and that looked at e-prescribing trends in the United States
pharmacies. The pharmacy’s software vendor charges between 2008 and 2014. In 2008, only 7% of physicians
transaction fees, and there may be a one-time start-up fee were e-prescribing using an EMR; this increased to
and monthly charges. A free stand-alone e-prescribing 70% by 2014. From December 2008 to April 2014,
system is available through the National ePrescribing community pharmacies enabled to accept e-prescriptions
Patient Safety Initiative, so prescribers may not have increased from 76% to 96%. In 2008, only 4% of new
to purchase a system; however, they may be charged and renewal prescriptions were sent electronically. By
monthly access fees for certain services. Several barri- 2013, 57% were sent electronically.
ers are related specifically to the absence of standards,
certification issues, and technology. There is no standard
for drug terminology or prior authorization. There is no Summary
standard for the signa, or the instructions to patients
on how to take the medication. Some systems allow for Prescribing medications is one of the most common
free-text, whereas others use a drop-down menu, which tasks that you will perform as a health-care provider.
may actually increase errors in this part of the prescrip- You have the responsibility to understand and follow
tion. Like EMR systems, e-prescribing systems have federal and state laws that grant and govern prescribing
to meet certification criteria. Other barriers identified authority. Avoid the use of dangerous abbreviations
include software functionality problems, input errors by and pay special attention to commonly confused
prescribers, inaccuracies in formulary information, and drugs. Because of the growing epidemic of medication
system incompatibilities that exist between prescriber misuse and overdose, ensure that you are taking steps
software and pharmacy dispensing software. to prevent altering of prescriptions, especially of con-
One barrier was the inability to prescribe controlled trolled substances, and to safeguard prescription pads
substances electronically; however, the DEA revised a from unintended access. The adoption of electronic
regulation that gave prescribers the option of writing prescribing has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing
prescriptions for controlled substances electronically. common prescription errors and eliminating illegibility
The Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances errors. To reinforce the content of this chapter, please
(EPCS) rule became effective on June 1, 2010. These complete the worksheets that follow. And be sure to
regulations provide the option of transmitting prescrip- review Appendix A, the Document Library, for full
tions for controlled substances electronically but do not case examples of patient documentation.
Name:
Review
2. If federal prescribing law differs from state law, which must the prescriber follow?
4. List at least five precautions that prescribers should take to control and protect their DEA registration.
Name:
Medication Review I
A patient takes the following medications:
Colace 100 mg; ferrous sulfate 325 mg; aspirin 81 mg; Tramadol 50 mg
1. Look up each of the medications. Indicate which ones are available over the counter and which require a
prescription.
2. Look up ferrous sulfate. List at least three different brand names for the drug, the different preparations
available, and the strengths available.
3. Look up tramadol. List a brand name for tramadol and the name for tramadol with acetaminophen. List
the strengths available in each brand.
Name:
Medication Review II
A patient takes the following medications:
Lantus 22 units each morning Lisinopril 5 mg daily
Omeprazole 40 mg daily Celebrex 200 mg daily
Xanax 0.25 mg twice daily Aspirin 81 mg daily
Boniva 150 mg monthly Mirtazapine 30 mg nightly
1. Look up all the medications listed and indicate which ones are controlled substances and on what
schedule.
2. Look up Xanax and write all the strengths that are available.
Name:
1. Look up Lotensin HCT. List the two medications contained in the formulation and the strengths that are
available.
2. Look up Mevacor and list the strengths that are available and the generic name for the medication.
3. Look up amlodipine on the ISMP’s list of confused drug names (available at http://www.ismp.org/Tools/
Confused-Drug-Names.aspx) and identify the drug commonly confused with amlodipine. Look up both
medications and identify why they are typically prescribed.
Name:
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were used in this chapter. Beside each, write the meaning pertaining to the context of this
chapter.
ADEs CDC
CDSS CMS
CSA DAW
DEA EMR
EPCS FDA
ISMP MMA
NPI TFA
TMP/SMX
Chapter 10
Admitting a Patient
to the Hospital
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• Identify components of an admission history and physical examination for a medical and a surgical
admission.
• List specific components of typical admit orders.
• Discuss the importance of medication reconciliation.
• Define Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS).
• Discuss the benefits and challenges of using a CPOE/CDSS system.
• Identify components of an admit note.
217
Health Maintenance and Immunizations address psychosocial concerns on the patient’s behalf.
It is usually not necessary to document health main- At some hospitals, you may need to write a specific
tenance information in an admission H&P because order to initiate these services.
the focus of the hospitalization is to treat and resolve Language and cultural barriers could have a dramatic
the current medical condition, and health mainte- impact on a patient’s hospital course. Under a number
nance is better addressed on an outpatient basis when of laws (see Medicolegal Alert!), hospitals must ensure
the patient is not acutely ill. It may be important to that there is no discrimination in patient care and that
include immunization status if pertinent to the CC; there is effective communication between health-care
in the case of a patient admitted for pneumonia, you providers and patients who are deaf or hard of hearing
should document whether the patient has had the or have any language barrier. The Office of Civil Rights
pneumococcal vaccination and when that was given. (OCR) has determined that effective communication
If a patient presents with abdominal pain and weight must be provided at “critical points” during the hospi-
loss, you should document if and when the patient has talization. Critical points include those points during
had a colonoscopy. which critical medical information is communicated,
such as at admission, when explaining procedures,
Family History (FH) when informed consent is required for treatment, and
The amount of family history (FH) that needs to be at discharge. Many electronic medical record (EMR)
documented in an admission H&P will vary according systems have a specific way to document interpretive
to the reason for admission. If a patient is admitted for services, such as the interpreter’s name and identification
pneumonia, FH is not likely to affect management of number, what type of service was used (i.e., on-site
the patient. If a patient is admitted because of acute interpreter or video remote interpreter), and what
substernal chest pain and the plan is to evaluate for language was used.
myocardial infarction, a family history of cardiovascular
disease would be an important risk factor that you need
to be aware of because the type and number of risk MEDICOLEGAL ALERT !
factors could affect your management of the patient.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),
Social History (SH) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for enforcing
It is important to document any history of tobacco, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits
drug, or alcohol use. Patients who smoke will be at risk discrimination based on race, color, and national origin,
for specific complications related to their smoking. If a and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
patient drinks alcohol on a daily basis, hospitalization which prohibits discrimination based on disability against
interrupts the intake of alcohol and puts the patient recipients of financial assistance from HHS. OCR is also
at risk for withdrawal. Abrupt cessation of other sub- responsible for ensuring compliance with Title II of the
stances may put the patient at risk for withdrawal, so Americans with Disabilities Act as it applies to health
documenting the substance use alerts you to monitor and human services as well as activities of state and
for changes in the patient’s condition that may signal local governments. This legislation requires hospitals to
withdrawal. If the patient is not able to make his or her provide interpreter services for non-English speakers
own decisions, you should document who is responsible or patients with other communication barriers. Using
for medical decision-making. A hospitalization can be a a family member or bilingual staff to interpret does not
major stressor, not only for the patient, but also for family fulfill the obligation for interpreter services and can result
members. If the patient is a caregiver for someone else, in inaccurate information exchange that can seriously
such as a spouse with dementia or a child with special impact the patient’s health. Legislation also requires that
needs, the concern about who will care for that person certain forms (such as a surgical consent form) and
often adds additional stress that can affect the patient’s patient education materials are available in languages
course of recovery. Other SH to document includes other than English. Hospitals must make “reasonable
what kind of help the patient may need at the time of accommodations” during a hospitalization to meet the
discharge; what support system, if any, is available to needs of any person who is disabled.
the patient; what religious practices are important to
the patient and if those practices can be observed in the
hospital setting; and if there are dietary considerations Review of Systems (ROS)
that may affect the patient’s nutritional needs during As a provider, you need to be aware of the CMS Guide-
the hospital stay. Ancillary personnel, such as social lines for E/M services when deciding how much of the
workers, discharge planners, nutritional counselors, review of systems (ROS) to document. This decision
and chaplains or clergy, are typically available to help will also be influenced by the patient’s overall medical
condition, the reason for the hospitalization, and the admission H&P because these results can be found
level of acuity. The higher the level of complexity of elsewhere in the medical record. Be sure to include
the E/M (see Chapter 1), the greater the need for any results that are most pertinent to the reason for
detailed documentation. If a 25-year-old man who hospitalization. If you identified multiple problems
has no significant past medical history is hospitalized in the Assessment section, then typically you would
for pain related to a kidney stone, the ROS could be document the abnormal results correlating to each
limited to general and genitourinary systems, and the problem. Using the example of a patient admitted with
E/M is straightforward. If a 75-year-old woman who pneumonia, it would be important to document that
has HTN, diabetes, hypothyroidism, and uterine cancer the chest x-ray confirms the presence of a right lower
presents with abdominal pain, the ROS will need to lobe (RLL) infiltrate, the complete blood count (CBC)
be much more comprehensive, and the E/M is much shows an elevated white blood cell count (WBC) of
more complex. At times, a patient’s condition may 13.7, and the differential indicates a left shift. In most
make it impossible to obtain any ROS (for instance, a cases, normal results are not documented in this section.
patient on a ventilator or with advanced dementia); in
such circumstances, you should always document why Problem List, Assessments, and Differential
an ROS was not obtained. Diagnoses
Two of the most important sections of the admission
Physical Examination H&P are those that contain the problem list, assess-
General Assessment ments, and differential diagnoses and that outline
The patient’s progress—or lack thereof—will be gauged the treatment plan. You would list the problem that
by change from his or her baseline at admission; necessitated hospital admission first as the admitting
therefore, documentation of the general assessment diagnosis. When a patient presents with a symptom,
is important to allow for this comparison. Describe such as chest pain, and you have not reached a definitive
the patient’s level of alertness; orientation to person, diagnosis, then state the problem or symptom followed
place, and time; ability to comprehend the situation; by a brief overview or explanation of why the patient
and reliability to provide the history. If someone other needs admission, as shown in Examples 10.1 and 10.2.
than the patient provides the history, document who
and his or her relationship to the patient. Describe the EXAMPLE 10.1
patient’s overall state of health, such as well-developed,
Chest pain, strong risk factors for cardiac etiology. Initial
well-nourished; frail and emaciated; or appears older than
cardiac enzymes are within normal limits (WNL). There
stated age. Documentation of the general appearance
is ST-segment elevation in the anterior leads; however,
should paint a picture of the patient at the time of
it is unclear whether these are acute changes.
admission so that someone reading the H&P who
has not seen the patient would be able to formulate
an image of the patient. EXAMPLE 10.2
Vital Signs
Multiple sets of vital signs may be documented in the Acute mental status change. Patient transferred from
admission H&P. If a patient presents to the medical long-term care facility because of confusion, hypoten-
floor at 15:00 and the H&P is performed at 17:00 the sion, and elevated WBC . Indwelling catheter in place
following day, it is appropriate to document the first with cloudy urine. Cultures are pending; urosepsis is a
set of vital signs that were obtained the afternoon of likely cause for these symptoms.
admission and then the vital signs obtained most re-
cently. Document the date and time that each set was After the initial problem or diagnosis, document any
obtained. Because care is provided around the clock significant comorbid conditions or other problems that
during a hospitalization, military time is typically may affect the patient’s course of treatment in the hospital.
used to avoid confusion between morning and evening In Example 10.2 of a patient with acute mental status
times. In an EMR, the vital signs often autopopulate change, a decrease in creatinine clearance signifying
into the record, so every recorded set of vital signs is renal insufficiency would be significant because renal
available for review. insufficiency could affect the choice of antibiotics and
could create problems with volume status. Comorbid
Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results conditions typically documented in this section include
Documentation of laboratory data and other diagnostic HTN, diabetes, renal disease, any hematologic or onco-
studies should support the need for the hospitalization. logic problems, and any medical conditions that would
Not every test result obtained is documented in the require ongoing monitoring and treatment.
Diagnosis: ________________________________________________________________________________________________
Surgeon: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
Medications: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Allergies: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
Other: __________________________________________
a blood transfusion or administration of other blood Problem List, Assessments, and Differential
products might be needed during hospitalization, be Diagnoses and the Treatment Plan
sure to identify any factor that would affect the patient’s Typically, you would list the condition necessitating
willingness to receive such products. This is commonly surgical intervention first in the Assessment and prob-
seen when a patient is of the Jehovah’s Witness faith lem list section, followed by any comorbid conditions
and is not willing to accept transfusion of blood or that would require perioperative monitoring or that
blood products. could potentially give rise to postoperative complica-
tions. Documentation of the Plan section includes the
ROS
planned operative intervention and may also include
If not fully explored in the HPI, the ROS should focus specific pre-operative preparation, patient education,
on the system most closely related to the planned surgical consultations, and a general outline of postoperative care.
procedure. In the example of a patient being admitted
for cholecystectomy, you would document a detailed Sample H&P
gastrointestinal ROS. Inclusion of other systems or the Chapter 2 contains a sample comprehensive H&P for
level of review of other systems will be influenced by Mr. William R. Jensen (see Fig. 2-2) who presented in
the complexity of the planned procedure as well as the an outpatient setting to Dr. Scott and was evaluated for
type of anesthesia planned and any comorbid conditions fatigue and blood in the stool. Subsequent evaluation by
the patient may have. a gastroenterologist and surgeon led to the diagnosis of
adenocarcinoma of the colon. Using a case study format,
Physical Examination we will follow this patient’s care as he is admitted for
Documentation of the physical examination should surgical management. Figure 10-2 shows a sample
clearly establish the patient’s baseline pre-operative admission H&P for Mr. Jensen when he presents for
condition because postoperative assessment will surgical management. Compare Figures 10-2 and 2-2
focus on return to pre-operative functioning. Give to see how the comprehensive H&P is modified for a
careful attention to examination of the body area surgical admission H&P.
involved in the surgery. Many surgeries will be done Two sets of admit orders will be written for Mr. Jensen:
after administration of general anesthesia; therefore, his initial pre-operative admit orders and the initial
it is especially important to document pulmonary postoperative orders. We discuss documentation of
function. Examination of the upper respiratory sys- an admit note in this chapter. In Chapter 11, we will
tem should include the oropharynx, noting any loose follow Mr. Jensen’s care through documentation of the
teeth or dental work, such as partial or full dentures. operative report, an operative note, daily progress notes,
Lower respiratory system assessment should include and orders, and then conclude the hospitalization with
chest shape, symmetry of expansion with respiration, documentation of discharge orders and the discharge
diaphragmatic movement, respiratory effort, and the summary in Chapter 12.
quality of breath sounds in all lung fields. How much
additional examination is done is influenced by the
presence of comorbid conditions, overall patient health Admission Orders
status, complexity of the planned surgical procedure,
estimated operative time, and anticipated postoper- When a patient is admitted to the hospital, the orders
ative course. written at the time of admission direct the health-care
team in caring for the patient. It is important that
Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results the orders are completed in a timely manner and
Laboratory and other diagnostic studies are sometimes are unambiguous. Once written, an order is in effect
completed on an outpatient basis before the patient’s until another order is written to change or stop the
hospital admission. When this is the case, it is important original order, unless a time or dose limit is provided
to document pertinent results in the H&P, and a copy in the original order. For example, an order to record
of all results should be made part of the permanent intake and output would be carried out until an order
medical record. The need for baseline pre-operative is written to discontinue recording intake and output.
testing is correlated to the patient’s age, overall medical An order for Ancef 1 g IV every 8 hr × 3 doses will be
condition, and type of surgery the patient will have. given for only 3 doses; thus, it is not necessary to write
Some facilities have set policies, such as obtaining an an order to stop Ancef. However, an order for heparin
ECG in every patient 40 years of age or older and a 5,000 units SQ every 8 hours would be given every day
chest x-ray (CXR) in any patient who smokes or who that the patient is in the hospital unless the order is
is 50 years of age or older. specifically discontinued.
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a 67-year-old Caucasian male who was referred to me by his primary care physician,
Vernon Scott, MD, after being diagnosed with colon cancer. Mr. Jensen initially presented to Dr. Scott’s office with complaints of
fatigue and “feeling weak.” During a routine workup, he was found to have hemoccult-positive stool. At this time, Mr. Jensen was
referred to a gastroenterologist, Michael Bennett, MD. Dr. Bennett performed a colonoscopy on Mr. Jensen and found several
suspicious polypoid lesions at the right hepatic flexure area. Biopsies were obtained and sent to pathology. Pathology reports confirm
adenocarcinoma. Dr. Scott and Dr. Bennett consulted, and they referred Mr. Jensen to me for surgical evaluation. I saw Mr. Jensen in
my office on XX/XX/XX and discussed with him options for treatment. I recommended that we proceed with a right hemicolectomy. I
discussed with Mr. Jensen and his wife the likely benefits of the surgery. I discussed specific risks of surgery, including infection,
bleeding, perforation of bowel or vessel, possible anesthetic complications, and death. I answered questions to their satisfaction and
believe Mr. Jensen competent to give informed consent. He stated his wish to proceed, and his wife is agreeable; therefore, Mr. Jensen
is admitted now for elective surgery.
Surgical: Mr. Jensen had repair of a torn rotator cuff, right shoulder (Dr. Rodriquez, Grand Rapids, MI), approximately 24 years
ago. He had a left inguinal herniorrhaphy approximately 15 years ago (Dr. Simmons, Grand Rapids, MI). All surgical procedures
tolerated well; no complications with bleeding or infection postoperatively. He did not have any complications from
anesthesia. He has never had any blood transfusions but is agreeable to receive blood or blood products if needed. Since
the likelihood of significant bleeding is fairly low, he did not arrange for autologous donation.
Medications: Lotensin HTC 20/12.5, once daily; Mevacor 20 mg once daily. Occasional acetaminophen.
Allergies: Mr. Jensen states an allergy to PENICILLIN DRUGS and breaks out in a rash when he takes anything containing penicillin.
FAMILY HISTORY: Mother deceased, age 70, breast cancer. No other family history of cancer. No history of bleeding disorders.
SOCIAL HISTORY: Mr. Jensen is a retired electrician. He is married and lives in a single-story home with his wife. They have three
adult children who all live nearby. Mr. Jensen smokes a pipe about 3 times a week. He does not drink alcohol or use any recreational
drugs. He is still active and walks approximately 2 miles 4 of 7 days per week. He also bicycles occasionally. He is competent to make
his own decisions regarding health care. He has designated his wife as medical power of attorney. Advance directives and living will
have been discussed, and both were present at time of admission. Mr. Jensen desires full resuscitation and any heroic measures
indicated. His wife and children are available to help care for him at home after discharge. They have a good support system. He
denies any specific dietary considerations. No particular religious practices that he desires to participate in while in the hospital.
REVIEW OF SYSTEMS:
General: Easily fatigued, feels weak. Denies any near-syncope or lightheadedness. Overall mood is positive, and he
believes having the surgery is his best chance for cure.
Cardiovascular: Specifically denies chest pain, angina, and pleuritic pain. Denies any heart palpitations or irregularities in
rhythm. No history of heart murmur.
Gastrointestinal: Biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma per HPI. Hemoccult-positive stool at initial presentation to Dr. Scott,
along with 10-pound unintentional weight loss over past few months. Weight has been stable since. Denies abdominal
pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Denies any difficulty swallowing or chewing.
(Continued)
Author ISBN #
Author's review
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company.
Sullivan 6662
All rights reserved.
(if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
F10_02_p1 6662_C_F10_02_p1.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
04/05/18
AB/CO Editor's review
Check if revision X
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
10_Sullivan_Ch10.indd 224 7/4/18 3:42 PM
Initials
Chapter 10 Admitting a Patient to the Hospital | 225
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vital Signs: BP 142/80; P 86 and regular, R 16 and regular; Temp 97.8 orally. His current weight is 174 pounds.
General: Mr. Jensen is a well-developed, well-nourished Caucasian man who is alert and cooperative. He is a good historian and
answers questions appropriately.
HEENT: Nose patent bilaterally. No polyps noted. Oropharynx without erythema or exudate. Buccal mucosa intact without lesions.
Full dentition in good repair, no loose teeth.
Respiratory: Breath sounds clear to auscultation in all lung fields. Diaphragmatic excursion is symmetrical. No increased
AP diameter.
Abdomen: Soft, nontender. No masses or organomegaly. Bowel sounds physiological in all four quadrants. No guarding or
rebound noted. Well-healed left inguinal scar from previous surgery.
LABORATORY DATA:
CBC: WBC 5,800; Hct 48; Hgb 16. Peripheral smear shows normochromic, normocytic cells, differential unremarkable.
UA: WNL.
ECG: Normal sinus rhythm with rate of 84. No ectopy, no ischemic changes.
ASSESSMENT:
1. Adenocarcinoma of the colon.
2. Hypertension. Stable on current medications. Will be monitored closely postoperatively.
3. Dyslipidemia.
PLAN:
1. Mr. Jensen is admitted for elective right hemicolectomy. Admission orders written. Consent form completed and on chart.
2. Routine postoperative care.
3. Will have Dr. Scott follow for medical management of hypertension.
David K. Sanders, MD
would be written over and over, such as chest pain, rule of a precompleted
B/W 4/Corder 2/Cset Xis 2ndshown
PMS
color in Figure 10-3. OK Correx
Pre-admission Orders
Tests:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Other Tests:
Pre-operative Orders
Other Tests:
______________________________________________________ Medical Necessity _______________________________
Treatments:
Arterial Line:
Additional Orders:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CAVA DIMPLS, which stands for Admit, Diagnosis, documented as critical. If a patient is having crushing
Condition, Activity, Vital signs, Allergies, Diet, Inter- chest pain and is diaphoretic with an irregular heart
ventions, Medications, Procedures, Labs, and Special rate, the condition might be documented as unstable.
instructions. Each component is described in more detail Other words commonly used to describe condition are
and an example of each is provided. Figure 10-4 presents stable, guarded, moribund, and comatose.
the mnemonic in a condensed form.
Activity
Admit Indicate the level of activity the patient is permitted
Specify the admitting physician and the hospital unit to have. There are several activity orders commonly
to which the patient should be admitted. Admit to used; the condition of the patient (including mental
Dr. Johnson to the orthopedic floor or Admit to Dr. Myers alertness) and the overall health condition of the patient
to telemetry unit. determine which order is most appropriate. Common
activity orders include the following:
Diagnosis
State the admitting diagnosis and, in the case of a • Up ad lib (the patient may be out of bed as he or
surgical admission, include the name of the procedure she wishes)
to be performed. When a patient has more than one • Activity as tolerated (whatever the condition
admitting diagnosis, be sure to list the problem most allows the patient to do)
responsible for admission as the primary diagnosis. • Bedrest with bathroom privileges, abbreviated as
If there are any comorbid conditions that should be BR with BRP (allowed out of bed to go to the
monitored during the hospital stay, document them bathroom; otherwise in bed)
as additional diagnoses. Primary diagnosis: pneumonia. • Out of bed (OOB)
Secondary diagnosis: type 2 diabetes. • Ambulate a certain number of times a day
• Ambulate with assistance
Condition • Non–weight-bearing
This reflects the patient’s condition at the time of
admission based on overall appearance, vital signs, and Vital Signs
severity of injury or illness. If a patient has multiple This order reflects how often the standard vital signs
injuries from a motor vehicle crash and is semicon- (VS) (temperature [T], heart rate [HR], respiratory
scious with unstable vital signs, the condition might be rate [RR], and blood pressure [BP]) should be obtained
AD CAVA DIMPLS
Admit: admitting physician and type of unit or hospital floor
Medications: medications related to reason for admission and any chronic medications the patient may be taking
Special instructions: notify if certain parameters are exceeded, or conditional orders (if this occurs, do this)
and will vary according to the patient’s condition. Some by mouth. If allowing the patient to eat does not pose a
hospitals have standing orders for VS depending on the threat to safety, there are many dietary orders that you
type of unit or floor to which the patient is admitted. can write. It is not possible to include all the dietary
Critical or intensive care units almost always have orders in this text; some of the more common types
their own standing orders. Some VS are monitored of diets are shown in Table 10-1. Consultation with a
continuously as the patient’s condition warrants; for dietitian is usually an option. Often hospitals will have
instance, BP and HR are monitored continuously in a a dietary manual available for review as well.
patient who recently had a myocardial infarction. Typical
orders for medical admissions are VS q8h while awake Interventions
(if the patient is very stable and if it is not necessary to This refers to interventions by nursing or other ancillary
awaken a patient to obtain VS) and VS q4h. staff, such as physical therapy or respiratory therapy. One
Generally, weight is obtained only at the time of example of an intervention is single volume nebulizer
admission. If a patient’s condition necessitates moni- (SVN) with 0.5 mL albuterol in 2.5 mL normal saline
toring of volume status or renal function as in the case (NS) q4h. Another example is Physical therapy (PT)
of heart failure, edema, or fluid retention, write an order to evaluate and treat. Intravenous (IV) therapy is also
to weigh daily. considered an intervention. If you write an order for
IV therapy, you should specify the type of fluid and the
Allergies rate of administration, such as D5NS (5% dextrose in NS)
This is not actually an order but rather a specific no- at 80 mL/hr. (Consult the Bibliography for suggested
tation of allergies that the patient may have to any readings related to principles of IV therapy.)
medication, food, or other substance. It is customary
to include the specific agent the patient is allergic to Medications
and what reaction the patient has to the agent. One Unfortunately, medication errors and adverse drug
way to note this is Allergic to penicillin (rash) and aspi- events are common during a hospitalization. The impact
rin (dyspnea). You may find some providers document of these events on patient welfare and the financial
the details of the reaction in the PMH section of the burden, both to the patient and the health-care system,
admission H&P and list the drugs only in the orders; are significant. In 2005, The Joint Commission put
this is an acceptable practice. If it is hospital policy to forth medication reconciliation as National Patient
identify patients with allergies by a special armband Safety Goal (NPSG) No. 8 in an effort to minimize
or other designation, then it is not necessary to write adverse events at point of care transitions. Medication
a specific order for this. reconciliation is the process of comparing a patient’s
Diet medication orders to all of the medications that the
patient has been taking. This reconciliation is done to
The first step in deciding what type of diet to order
avoid medication errors, such as omissions, duplica-
is usually to determine whether it is safe to allow the
tions, dosing errors, or drug interactions. This process
patient to eat. If the patient is going to have surgery or
comprises five steps:
a procedure that requires sedation and, therefore, car-
ries a risk for aspiration, or if a patient is not mentally 1. Develop a list of current medications (includ-
alert enough or physically able to eat and swallow, it ing prescription medications, over-the-counter
is safer for the patient not to receive any nourishment medications, herbals, vitamins, and nutritional
by mouth. The order for this is NPO, an abbreviation supplements).
for the Latin phrase nil per os, interpreted as nothing 2. Develop a list of medications to be prescribed.
3. Compare the medications on the two lists. Laboratory and Other Diagnostic Studies
4. Make clinical decisions based on the comparison. It may be necessary to monitor certain laboratory values
5. Communicate the new list to the patient and to or obtain diagnostic studies as part of a patient’s care.
appropriate caregivers. For instance, when a patient is on an anticoagulant
Because additional medications are likely to be pre- medication, you monitor the bleeding time. If a patient
scribed during the hospitalization, you must complete develops fever and a cough, you might order a CXR. You
a thorough medication reconciliation at the time of should always have a rationale for ordering laboratory
admission so you and the pharmacy staff can determine or other diagnostic studies. If a patient had surgery but
whether drug–drug interactions or drug–disease inter- had very little intra-operative bleeding, it is unnecessary
actions could occur. With that in mind, always specify to order H&H (hematocrit and hemoglobin) q am; you
the name of the medication, the dose, the route, and would not expect the values to change because there was
frequency of administration (see Chapter 9, Elements little blood loss. When ordering imaging studies such
of a Prescription section). It is common to write orders as x-rays or computed tomography (CT), you should
first for any medications that are given for the condi- include the indication for the study, not only to aid
tion necessitating hospitalization, then orders for any in the interpretation of the study but also to establish
medications taken before hospitalization that need to the relevance of the study to the patient’s overall care.
be continued, and then orders for any symptomatic An example is AP (anteroposterior) & lateral CXR to
medications. evaluate for pneumonia.
Symptomatic medications are those that may or may not
be needed. During a hospitalization, patients experience Special Instructions
sleeplessness, constipation, pain, and nausea with such The rationale for special instruction orders is to ensure
frequency that typically orders are written at the time that nursing staff informs you of changes in a patient’s
of admission so that medications are available to treat condition that may require some intervention. For
these symptoms if they develop. Not only will these instance, results of glucose monitoring above or below
orders reduce discomfort for the patient, they will also a certain level may require withholding, increasing, or
prevent nursing staff from having to call you at 2:00 to decreasing insulin doses. You would write an order
request a sleep aid. You would order these medications to Notify Dr. Wattanapanit if blood sugar is less than
on an as-needed (or PRN, Latin for pro re nata) basis, 100 mg/dL or greater than 350 mg/dL. If a patient was
and they would be administered only as requested by admitted two days ago for AMI and now has new onset
the patient. If you write an order for a PRN medication, of atrial fibrillation, you want to be alerted to that fact.
you always want to include the indication for giving the You should never assume that the nursing staff will notify
medication. An order written as morphine 2 mg IV PRN you automatically of such developments. As a general
is open for interpretation. Although the nursing staff rule, they probably would; however, the responsibility
would recognize that morphine is a narcotic analgesic of managing changes in the patient’s condition rests on
and would know that it is given to relieve pain, the order the attending medical staff—not the nursing staff—and
is ambiguous. Instead, it should be written with specific you can manage only what you are aware of. Writing
dosing, frequency, and indication instructions, such as the special instruction order protects you as a clinician
morphine 2 mg IV q2h PRN mild pain. This prevents the and helps to ensure the best treatment for the patient.
medication from being administered for reasons other
than pain and establishes a safe time frame in which
the medication may be administered. Always order Perioperative Orders
a specific dose, rather than a range of dosing such as
morphine 2–6 mg IV q2-3h PRN pain. This helps prevent Perioperative is a term that is used to refer to all three
inappropriate administration of the medication. phases of surgery (pre-operative, intra-operative, and
postoperative). When a patient is admitted for sur-
Procedures gery, the initial pre-operative orders are in effect until
Many routine procedures are part of a patient’s daily the patient goes to surgery. Pre-operative orders for
care, and it may seem intuitive that these procedures Mr. Jensen are shown in Figure 10-5. After surgery, the
should be performed. However, writing an order for patient goes to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU),
such procedures as daily catheter care, wound or ostomy sometimes referred to as the recovery room. While the
care, and dressing changes provides justification for patient is there, the staff generally follows prewritten
performing these procedures and allows the hospital PACU orders, like those shown in Figure 10-6. Once the
to charge for the necessary supplies. The order should patient is awake, maintaining an airway with adequate
specify how frequently the procedures should be carried respirations and has stable vital signs, the patient is
out, such as dressing change three times daily. essentially re-admitted to the hospital and a new set of
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
3. Condition: good
4. Activity: up ad lib
6. Allergic to PENICILLIN
9. IV D5NS at 80 mL/hr
Countersignature: _____________________________________________
postoperative orders must be written. We use the same after surgery, but you must take into consideration
mnemonic provided earlier, AD CAVA DIMPLS, to the type of surgery and the patient’s overall condition
write the postoperative orders for Mr. Jensen. when determining the activity level. An activity order
for Mr. Jensen could be OOB three times a day (TID)
Admit with assistance.
The patient is typically admitted to the surgeon.
Vital Signs
Diagnosis In the immediate postoperative period, vital signs are
The postoperative admitting diagnosis is usually the obtained progressively. A common postoperative order is
condition that required surgical intervention, and it VS qh x 4; if stable, then q2h x 4, then q4h. An order such
may include the type of procedure done. For instance, as this reflects the possibility that a patient’s condition
Mr. Jensen’s admitting diagnosis could be written as might change in the immediate postoperative period
colon cancer, status post (S/P) hemicolectomy. and that more frequent assessment is needed initially,
but if the patient’s vital signs remain stable, then less
Condition frequent assessment is permitted.
Condition refers to how the patient is doing immediately
after surgery when the postoperative orders are written. Allergies
Any allergies should be noted in the orders.
Activity
When writing the activity order, keep in mind that Diet
postoperative patients usually require at least some Surgical patients usually have special dietary needs in
narcotic pain relief, which may impair judgment or the postoperative periods. The type of surgery and the
function. Safety precautions may be indicated, such as type of anesthesia usually determine the type of diet
side rails up at all times or ambulate only with assistance. ordered. When a patient undergoes surgery involving
To prevent complications associated with immobility, the gastrointestinal
Author
tract, ISBN
often
#
paralyzing agents are
Author's review
patients are encouraged to be out of bed immediately used to prevent
Sullivan peristalsis during
6662 surgery. Various
(if needed) factors
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
Copyright © 2019 by6662_C_F10_05.eps
F10_05 F. A. Davis Company. AllInitials
rights reserved.
Date
Artist Date
04/05/18
AB/CO Editor's review
Check if revision X
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 25p0 Initials
Oxygen 2–6 L with nasal cannula or 6–10 L/min flow with simple mask. Titrate to maintain saturation above 93%.
Small-Volume Nebulizer - __________________________ for bronchospasm.
Remove oropharyngeal / nasopharyngeal airway when patient maintains airway. May reinsert as needed for airway obstruction.
Medications: Hold and Notify Physician of Allergy to Any Ordered Medication
Morphine sulfate: 2 mg IV every 5 minutes for moderate pain (pain scale 4–7)
2 mg IV every 2 minutes for severe pain (pain scale 8–10); MAX DOSE: _______ mg
Hydromorphone: 0.2 mg slow IV push every 5 minutes for moderate pain (pain scale 4–7)
0.2 mg slow IV push every 2 minutes for severe pain (pain scale 8–10); MAX DOSE: _______ mg
Fentanyl: _______ mcg IV every 5 minutes for moderate pain (pain scale 4–7)
_______ mcg IV every 2 minutes for severe pain (pain scale 8–10); MAX DOSE: _______ mg
Ketorolac: _______ mg IV one time for moderate pain; do not use with moderate renal impairment
Acetaminophen 325 mg: 2 tablets orally for mild pain (scale 1–4) every 4 hours as needed.
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 5 mg/500 mg: 1 tablet orally as needed every 4 hours for moderate pain (pain scale 5–7)
2 tablets orally as needed every 4 hours for severe pain (pain scale 8–10)
Oxycodone/Acetaminophen 5 mg/325 mg: 1 tablet orally as needed every 4 hours for moderate pain (pain scale 5–7)
2 tablets orally as needed every 4 hours for severe pain (pain scale 8–10)
Midazolam: _______ mg IV as needed for anxiety; MAX DOSE: _______ mg
Lorazepam: _______ mg IV as needed for anxiety; MAY REPEAT _______ times
Droperidol: 0.625 mg IV every 15 minutes for nausea; maximum dose of 1.25 mg in 1 hour.
Ondansetron: 4 mg slow IV push over 2 minutes for nausea; to be given as a one-time dose only on the day of
surgery
Prochlorperazine: 5 mg slow IV push over 2 minutes every 6 hours as needed for nausea; may repeat dose after 15
minutes if no relief. Maximum dose of 10 mg in 6 hours. Total maximum dose in 24 hours is 40 mg.
Metoclopramide: 10 mg IV one time for nausea
Meperidine: 12.5 mg slow IV; push every 15 minutes as needed for treatment of postanesthetic shivering;
MAX DOSE: _______ mg
Hypotension for Blood Pressure less than _______ systolic Call Anesthesia
Ephedrine _______ mg IV every _______ minutes 5% Albumin 250 mL IV over _______ minutes
Other: ____________________________________________
Hypertension for Blood Pressure greater than _______ systolic Call Anesthesia
PREFERRED AGENTS FOR SAME-DAY SURGERY (SDS) PREFERRED AGENTS FOR INPATIENT USE
Esmolol (Brevibloc): Give 500 mcg/kg IV over 1 min. if Labetalol (Trandate) 5 mg IV every 5 minutes. Maximum 20
inadequate response, give 50 mcg/kg IV—repeat every minute mg IV.
as needed for hypertension and/or tachycardia. Maximum of 4 Do NOT give if heart rate less than ___________
doses.
Do NOT give if heart rate less than _____________
Oral Agent: _________________________________________ Oral Agent: ____________________________________
Other: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
** DISCONTINUE MEDICATION ORDERS ON THIS PAGE WHEN TRANSFERRED TO NURSING UNIT **
Physician Name - Print and Sign - To Activate Only Orders Checked Above Date Time
such as age, mobility, and overall health status affect how liquid, soft, and regular diets. You may find that some
quickly bowel function returns after surgery. Patients practitioners prefer to write an order to advance diet as
are often kept NPO until bowel function returns. Once tolerated and not specify when to advance the diet or
bowel function resumes, indicated by the return of bowel what type of diet to follow, leaving the details to the
sounds or passing of flatus, you can advance the patient’s judgment of the nursing or dietary staff.
diet from liquids to solids as tolerated. Typically, the
initial diet order is clear liquids. If the patient is able to Interventions
tolerate clear liquids without any nausea or vomiting, Like any patient who has had abdominal surgery,
then the diet is advanced to full liquids and then to a Mr. Jensen is likely to have shallow respirations post-
regular diet or any special diet indicated for specific operatively, which puts him at risk for pulmonary
medical conditions. Table 10-2 provides information complications. To prevent such complications, an
about the liquids and foods allowed on clear and full important intervention order for Mr. Jensen is incentive
spirometry (IS) 10 times per hour while awake. Another
Table 10-2 Diets Commonly Used in the important intervention is maintaining hydration and
Postoperative Period nutrition. Until adequate oral intake is possible, IV
fluids should be administered. For Mr. Jensen, we will
Type of Diet Foods Allowed order D5NS @ 120 mL/hr.
Clear Liquid Diet
Often prescribed Broth Medications
for a short Gelatin Mr. Jensen will require some medications. Medications
period after
surgery to give
Tea administered orally may be withheld until bowel func-
gastrointestinal Popsicles tion returns. Symptomatic medications are indicated,
tract a rest Clear juices, such as apple, especially for pain and nausea. Specify not only the
cranberry, or grape name of the medication but also the dose, route, and
Clear sodas, such as lemon-lime frequency and the indications for any PRN medications.
or ginger ale
Some hospitals require the use of generic drug names,
Coffee may be allowed with
physician approval whereas others accept generic or trade names. Check
Full Liquid Diet with the hospital pharmacy to be sure which you should
Prescribed as a All the foods shown for clear use. A common option for managing postoperative pain
transition from liquid diet plus: is a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system. This
clear liquid to a Milk refers to an electronically controlled infusion pump
soft or regular diet Yogurt that delivers a prescribed amount of IV analgesic to a
Pudding patient when the pump is activated. Use of PCA has
Milkshake, ice cream, sherbet been shown to reduce the time between when a patient
Smooth cream soups feels pain and when the analgesia is delivered. It also
Oatmeal, cream of wheat, grits, reduces the chances for medication errors because
gravy the PCA is programmed per the physician’s order for
Dark sodas, such as colas specific doses and time intervals between doses. There
Juices with pulp, such as orange, is also a “lock-out” feature that prevents overdosing.
grapefruit, pineapple Figure 10-7 shows an order set for PCA.
Soft Diet An anti-emetic drug is usually ordered as a PRN
May be prescribed if Oatmeal medication. Nausea is common in the postoperative
patient has a sore Mashed or baked potatoes period, and anti-emetics can reduce nausea and prevent
throat following Bananas
endotracheal vomiting. Most anti-emetics potentiate the action of
intubation or Scrambled eggs narcotic analgesics, so frequently they are administered
dental problems Soft bread or rolls (not toasted) together. However, you would order the analgesics and
Applesauce anti-emetics separately so that they may be administered
Gelatin individually if both are not needed.
Puddings Once bowel function returns, Mr. Jensen’s pre-operative
Regular Diet medications should be restarted. It is also desirable to
Similar to what most Most foods are allowed; change from parenteral to oral analgesics when the
patients would moderate in salt, sugar, and fat patient can tolerate oral intake. In fact, the patient’s
consume at home Specific foods not allowed will
ability to obtain effective pain relief from oral analgesics
vary by facility; consult with dietary
and nutritional support personnel and return to oral intake of liquids and foods is often
considered criteria for discharge.
Choose one item Morphine Sulfate 1 mg/mL HYDROmorphone 0.2 mg/mL Fentanyl 20 mcg/mL
_____ mg (2–4 mg) IV every 15 ______ mg (0.2–0.6 mg) IV every 15 ______ mcg (10–40 mcg)
Loading Dose minutes until patient comfortable. minutes until patient comfortable. IV every 15 minutes until
Not to exceed 3 doses. Not to exceed 3 doses. patient comfortable. Not to
exceed 3 doses.
______ mg (1–2.5 mg [1 mg*]) ______ mg (0.2–0.4 mg [0.2 mg*]) ______ mcg (10–25 mcg
PCA Demand Dose [10 mcg*])
______ min (6–15 min [12 min*]) ______ min (6–15 min [8 min*]) ______ min (4–8 min
Lockout Interval [6 min*])
XX/XX/XX
0723
3. Condition: stable
4. Bedrest
6. Allergic to PENICILLIN
7. NPO
9. I&O
11. Morphine sulfate 1 mg/mL by PCA; demand dose 1 mg, lockout every 12 minutes; 4-hour dose limit: 20 mg
15. Notify if systolic pressure greater than 150 mm Hg or HR greater than 130
Countersignature: ______________________________________________________________
provides a list of Error-Prone Abbreviations, Symbols CPOE, studies have reported a reduction up to 70% in
and Dose Designations, which is shown in Appendix C. medication errors (Devine et al, 2010) and a significant
The increasing concerns for safety and the desire for decrease in medication orders that were inappropriate
reducing and preventing medication errors have resulted (Mattison et al, 2010). The average time from medica-
in adoption of Computerized Physician (or Provider) tion ordering to administration decreased from 100 to
Order Entry (CPOE) in many hospital systems. 64 minutes (Cartmill et al, 2012). The costs of avoiding
Osheroff and associates (2012) define CPOE as “the ADEs ranged from $7 to $16 million (Zimlichman
portion of a clinical information system that enables a et al, 2013), and the incidence of duplicated orders
patient’s care provider to enter an order for a medica- decreased by 84.8%, resulting in additional cost savings
tion, clinical laboratory or radiology test, or procedure for the institution (Magid et al, 2012). According to the
directly into a computer that then transmits the order results of the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey, 1,394
to the appropriate department, or individuals, so it can (75%) hospitals reported using a CPOE system in at
be carried out.” least one inpatient unit, compared with 384 in 2010.
Benefits of CPOE Challenges and Barriers to CPOE
Bobb and colleagues (2004) found that of 1,111 pre- One particular challenge associated with CPOE is selec-
scribing errors confirmed in their study, 65% were likely tion error. When a medication order is entered, usually
preventable with a basic CPOE system. Other studies the computer system will display a list of drug names
report preventable errors in the range of 43% to 72%. after a few letters have been entered. For example, if you
The number of potential preventable errors that was enter the letters m-e-t, medications such as Metamucil,
identified increased when basic CPOE was used in metformin, methadone, metaxalone, methyldopa and
conjunction with the Clinical Decision Support System metoprolol may show up on a selection list (Fig. 10-9a).
(CDSS). CDSS consists of automated checking to: Then you select the desired medication, but it is easy to
inadvertently select the wrong drug name. Once a drug
• Identify potential drug dose, allergy, and interac-
is selected, common doses will populate (Fig. 10-9b).
tion errors.
You must be cautious to select the correct medication
• Notify of duplicate orders.
and dose. Another challenge associated with CPOE is
• Recommend pre-administration or postadminis-
“alert fatigue.” The CDSS is designed to alert the pro-
tration tests.
vider when there are potential drug–drug interactions,
• Provide access to clinical reference information,
drug contraindications, drug–disease interactions, and
research, and guidelines.
drug allergies. Alert fatigue is caused by a combina-
• Substitute medication and test recommendations.
tion of critical medical alerts and a high volume of
Some CDSSs can also monitor patient treatment, marginally medically consequential alerts. Redundant
ensuring, for example, that the right drug is adminis- alerts can reduce providers’ sensitivity to the alerts,
tered to the right patient at the right time and can issue resulting in the provider dismissing the alert without
an alert or reminder and suggest a different course of actually investigating the concern, thereby increasing
treatment if a patient’s condition changes or if test results the opportunity for patient safety error.
are abnormal. Most CDSSs can provide health-care When EMRs were initially introduced, many systems
professionals with immediate electronic access to their did not include CPOE. Implementing a CPOE system
orders and comprehensive views of patient clinical data is always a challenge, and several barriers to CPOE use
and laboratory test results, allowing providers to make have been identified. CPOE has a considerable impact
more informed decisions about medications. Studies on work flow for health-care providers and hospital
of usage of CPOEs in major hospitals have found cost staff. Issues with interoperability with the EMR and
savings, increased use of preventive care interventions, CPOE systems are barriers to implementation. The
and improved clinical care. The literature supports the time required to train providers and staff is substantial.
beneficial effect of CPOE in reducing the frequency of Often, any pre-existing order sets must be modified or
a range of medication errors, including serious errors completely restructured for the CPOE system, which
with the potential for harm. CPOE integrates the med- is a labor- and resource-intensive process. Functional
ication order with patient information, such as allergies, problems often arise, so the availability of technical
laboratory results, and other prescription data. Then support is critical in implementing and ongoing use
the order is checked automatically for potential errors of CPOE. Because of the nuances and complexities of
or problems, such as drug and allergy interactions or the health-care environment, the standard information
drug-to-drug interactions. CPOE systems also suggest technology (IT) staff may not be able to resolve issues
default values for drug doses as well as routes and with CPOE function, and often they need input directly
frequency of administration. After implementation of from health-care providers and other staff to understand
B
Figure 10-9 One particular challenge associated with CPOE is selection error. (a) When a medication order
is entered, usually the computer system will display a list of drug names after a few letters have been entered. It is
easy to inadvertently select the wrong drug name. (b) Once a drug is selected, common doses will populate. You
must be cautious to select the correct medication and dose.
work-flow issues and the medical significance of various service. If a voice recognition system is used to generate
processes. Appropriate support must be available around the H&P, the document is saved into the EMR right
the clock, 365 days a year, which often results in hiring away, and then an admit note is not needed.
more staff at expense to the institution. Because of the The admit note is a permanent part of the medical
continuous introduction of new medications, changes record. As such, it should be thorough enough to com-
in indications or contraindications for medications, municate the reason for the patient’s hospitalization and
and availability of new diagnostic tests, regular system should include the presumptive diagnosis and treatment
updates must occur, resulting in ongoing training for plan, but keep in mind that it is a brief summary of the
system users and support staff. Every upgrade has the H&P. An admit note typically contains the patient’s
potential to disrupt work flow and impact functionality, identifying information, reason for admission, pertinent
which, in turn, may impact patient safety. Especially past medical history, medications, allergies, pertinent
for small and rural hospitals, the cost of implementing findings from the physical examination, pertinent lab-
CPOE is a considerable barrier; cost for a very basic oratory data, admitting diagnosis, and a summary of
CPOE system starts at around $1.5 million; in larger the treatment plan. It is usually written as a narrative
hospitals, the cost may be more than $10 million. paragraph. Example 10.5 shows an admit note.
EXAMPLE 10.5
Admit Notes Admit note: S.B. is a 72-year-old woman who devel-
oped symptoms of fever and cough 2 days ago and has
Records such as admission H&Ps, operative reports, and
had progressive dyspnea. Her past medical histor y is
discharge summaries are sometimes dictated, resulting
significant for chronic obstructive pulmonar y disease
in a delay between the time of dictation and when
(COPD) and HTN. She takes Accupril 10 mg daily and
the transcribed record appears on the chart or in the
uses a Combivent inhaler twice daily. On physical ex-
EMR. Because of this delay, it is customary to write a
amination, she is febrile and dyspneic but not cyanotic.
brief admit note. The purpose of the admit note is to
Crackles are heard in the right posterior lung. Hear t is
summarize the admission H&P and to provide infor-
tachycardic but regular, with a rate of 112. Chest x-ray
mation that will be needed to care for the patient until
reveals an RLL infiltrate. Presumptive diagnosis is RLL
the dictated records get to the chart. Document that
pneumonia. S.B. is admitted to the medical ser vice for
an admission H&P has been performed and dictated,
IV antibiotic therapy and suppor tive respirator y care.
indicating the date and time it was done. This informs
H&P done and dictated 8/22/XX, 1543; job ID 1564273.
other medical staff members that the H&P has been
Rachel Alford, MD
done so that it will not be duplicated. It also serves as
documentation that the H&P has been completed in
the required time. Most dictation systems assign a job Referring to the information found in the H&P for
number or report identifier; this should be documented Mr. Jensen (see Fig. 10-2) and the admit note shown in
as well in case dictations are lost or there is interrupted Example 10.5, write an admit note in the space provided.
Once you have completed the admit note, compare it with the one that follows.
Application Exercise 10.1 Answer
Admit Note: Mr. Jensen is a 67-year-old man who has colon cancer. Mr. Jensen originally presented with complaints of fatigue and on workup
was found to have blood in the stool. Colonoscopy revealed a mass and biopsy showed adenocarcinoma. Past medical history is significant for
hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. He is taking Lotensin HCT 20/12.5 once daily in the morning and Mevacor 20 mg once daily in the
afternoon. He is allergic to penicillin, which causes a rash. Laboratory studies done at time of admission reveal that the CBC is normal; the
chemistry panel reveals triglyceride of 178; LDL of 208; total cholesterol of 267; CEA of 17; otherwise WNL. CXR shows borderline cardiomeg-
aly but no effusion. The ECG is WNL. Mr. Jensen is admitted for elective right hemicolectomy. Routine pre-operative orders are written. H&P
done and dictated xx/xx/xx 0927. David Sanders, MD
Dictation # 478432
Name:
2. The medication listed for this patient is aspirin. Based on the documented PMH, what is the indication for
this medication?
4. Do you feel that the information documented in the social history is sufficient? Why or why not?
5. List the systems explored in the ROS and the total number of systems reviewed.
6. Does the ROS meet CMS guidelines for documentation? Why or why not?
7. Do you think the H&P contains enough information to justify hospital admission? Why or why not?
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a pleasant 76-year-old man who has been having urinary urgency and frequency for the
past week. Two days ago, he developed a fever. He remains febrile now and has experienced nausea but no vomiting. He denies
abdominal pain, chest pain, shortness of breath, or diarrhea. He does have a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
SOCIAL HISTORY: The patient is a former smoker, quit many years ago. Denies drug use. He drinks alcohol socially.
REVIEW OF SYMPTOMS: The patient denies any palpitations, chest pain, weakness, headaches, vision changes, nausea, vomiting,
abdominal pain. He did say that he had a history of blood clots due to an injury. This happened many years ago, he doesn’t recall the
specific date or his age at the time but says it was when he was in his 40s. He has never had any problems since.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vital Signs: Blood pressure is 128/69, pulse is 84, temperature is 100.3ºF with O2 sats 93% on room air, weight is 184 lb.
Abdomen: Soft, nontender, nondistended. No pain in the hypogastric area. No costovertebral angle tenderness. No
rebound tenderness or guarding.
Neurological: The patient is alert and oriented to time, place, and person. He responded to all questions appropriately. No
focal neurological deficits.
LABORATORY DATA:
CBC: WBC 12.9, hemoglobin 12.8, hematocrit 36.4 with neutrophils 83%. INR 1.2. Creatinine 1.4, BUN 25, sodium 134,
potassium 3.9, chloride 99, bicarbonate 24. The CT scan of the abdomen revealed diverticulosis of the colon with
thickening of the sigmoid colon suspicious of intramural diverticulitis. No abscess or free air. No hydronephrosis or stones.
ASSESSMENT:
1. Febrile.
2. Urine frequency, urgency.
3. Leukocytosis.
4. Hematuria.
5. Bacteriuria.
6. Acute renal failure.
7. CT scan of abdomen showed diverticulosis and thickening of the sigmoid colon; intramural diverticulitis.
8. History of TURP.
PLAN:
1. Obtain urine cultures, stain, sensitivity.
2. Blood cultures.
3. IV fluid resuscitation.
4. Start IV Flagyl.
5. Check PSA. Urology consultation and possible cystoscopy if urology recommends.
6. GI prophylaxis with Nexium.
7. Further plans depending on the hospital course.
Figure 10-10 Admission H&P for C.H. Author ISBN # Author's review
240 Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis
Sullivan 6662Company. All rights reserved.
(if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
F10_10 6662_C_F10_10.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
04/05/18
AB/CO Editor's review
Check if revision X
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
10_Sullivan_Ch10.indd 240 40p11 x 54p12 Initials 7/4/18 3:42 PM
8. Read the assessment section and then the laboratory data section. Identify any additional information that
you think should be recorded in the laboratory data section.
9. After reading and critically analyzing the H&P, identify strengths and weaknesses of the document.
Name:
A:
D:
C:
A:
V:
A:
D:
I:
M:
P:
L:
S:
Name:
Name:
3. The author states, “10-point review of systems is negative.” Identify any information you find in other
parts of the document that could be counted as ROS. List the systems reviewed and the total number of
systems reviewed.
4. Based on the discussion of documenting the social history in Chapter 2, what elements could be added to
the social history to make it more complete?
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: The patient is a very pleasant 74-year-old woman who came to see Dr. Rosenberg today for a
routine office physical examination and was noted to have a rapid heart rate. ECG obtained in his office showed atrial fibrillation with
a rate in the 150s. No prior history of palpitations. The patient states that she felt lightheaded most of the day yesterday, and
intermittently today. She denies syncope, headache, or visual changes. No chest pain or pressure, no shortness of breath. No other
dizziness, focal numbness or weakness, speech difficulties, trouble swallowing, or difficulty moving extremities. No abdominal pain,
recent diarrhea, or constipation. She does not exercise regularly but does do her own housework without any chest pressure or
exertional dyspnea.
MEDICATIONS:
1. Lantus 22 units in the morning subcutaneously
2. Lisinopril 5 mg daily
3. Omeprazole 40 mg daily
4. Celebrex 200 mg daily
5. Xanax 0.25 mg twice daily
6. Aspirin 81 mg PO daily
7. Boniva 150 mg monthly
8. Mirtazapine 30 mg nightly
FAMILY HISTORY: Family history is remarkable for both parents dying in their early 40s. Her mother had uncontrolled hypertension,
died from a stroke. Her father died from complications of long-standing diabetes.
SOCIAL HISTORY: The patient has been widowed since 2003. She has three daughters, one of whom lives nearby. She is a former
smoker but quit in 2000. No significant alcohol intake.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vital Signs: Blood pressure is 109/67, pulse 110 and irregular. Weight is 147 lb. Respiratory rate is 16. She is afebrile.
Neck: Supple. No increased jugular venous distention or carotid bruits are noted.
Heart: Heart rate is irregular, slightly tachycardic with an intermittent 2/6 systolic murmur.
Extremities: There is no peripheral edema. Distal pulses are present and normal. She has normal strength in both upper
and lower extremities.
LABORATORY STUDIES: ECG does show atrial fibrillation with rate of 150 with a right bundle branch block. WBC 9, Hgb 13.2,
platelets 264,000, sodium 131, potassium 4.6, chloride 93, bicarb 25. BUN 17, creatinine 1.2, normal creatinine 0.9. Glucose 481.
(Continued)
ASSESSMENT: This is a very pleasant 74-year-old woman who presents with new-onset atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate.
She otherwise is fairly asymptomatic. Of note, she did have a recent 2-D echo in June of this past year, and it was essentially
normal. There was some mild diastolic cardiac dysfunctions and 1–2 mitral regurgitation.
PLAN:
1. Atrial fibrillation. Will continue IV Cardizem, start on oral beta blocker and monitor heart rhythms. Will ask cardiology to
consult. Continue to rule out myocardial infarction. Will give once-daily Lovenox.
2. Hypertension. Hold the ACE inhibitor at this time.
3. Osteoporosis. On treatment.
4. Diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled at this time. Will continue Lantus and institute insulin protocol.
5. The Assessment and Plan portions in this admission H&P is a slightly different format compared with
other H&Ps you have seen in this chapter. Do you feel the Assessment and Plan sections, as documented,
sufficiently reflect a reason for hospitalization for this patient? Does the H&P meet CMS guidelines for
documentation? Why or why not?
Name:
Name:
Name:
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 10. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the con-
tent of this chapter.
ADEs AMI
AD CAVA DIMPLS AP
BMP BP
BR BRP
CAD CBC
CC CDSS
CMS COPD
CPOE CT
CVA CXR
D5NS ECG
ED E/M
EMR FH
H&H H&P
HHS HPI
HR HTN
I&O IS
ISMP IT
IV NPO
NPSG NS
OCR OOB
PACU PCA
PCP PMH
PRN PT
RLL ROS
RR SH
S/P SVN
T TID
VS WBC
WNL
257
progress note does not need to contain information with visitors, you might wonder about his or her
already documented in the H&P; instead, it focuses statement of having severe pain. On the other hand,
on any changes that have occurred in the condition of if the patient is lying curled in a fetal position, has
the patient from one day to the next. It is sometimes the lights off, and is grimacing or moaning, this is
helpful to ask the patient a general question, such a different assessment altogether. You are not likely
as, “Do you feel better, worse, or about the same?” to recall the details of the patient’s presentation, so
The answer to this question provides the patient’s document your observations. Vital signs are monitored
perspective on his or her response to treatment and and recorded at different intervals during a 24-hour
allows for comparison of how you think the patient period, depending on the frequency ordered. Some-
is progressing. Document the continued presence or times, you may summarize a range of results (e.g., pulse
resolution of any symptoms that the patient had at 80 to 104 in past 24 hours) or, for temperature, the
the time of admission. For example, if a patient was maximum result, in the note. In the EMR, vital signs
admitted for treatment of urosepsis and had fever and usually autopopulate into the record. How much
dysuria at the time of admission, document whether physical examination you do depends largely on the
the patient still has these symptoms. To assess the reason for admission and your medical discipline.
patient’s response to treatment or a procedure, you A patient being treated for a cerebrovascular accident
should anticipate what changes would be expected. The who has comorbid conditions would require more
patient with urosepsis who is treated with antibiotics extensive examination and, therefore, documenta-
should become afebrile with corresponding decrease tion, than a patient admitted for pneumonia who is
in the white blood cell (WBC) count, and you would otherwise healthy.
expect the patient to have less dysuria. The patient It is essential to document review of all test results
should be monitored for development of symptoms in a timely manner because missing an abnormal result
that might indicate an adverse reaction to treatment. could have a negative impact on the patient’s condition.
In the case of antibiotic administration, development You may use “shorthand” for documenting results of
of rash and difficulty breathing might indicate an a complete blood count (CBC), electrolytes, or basic
adverse reaction, so the presence or absence of these metabolic panel (BMP) (Fig. 11-1) in the paper-based
symptoms is a pertinent positive or negative. In addi- daily progress note. This provides a way to compare
tion to information that is obtained directly from the the newest results with previous ones. In the EMR
patient, the subjective portion could include review of format, usually the results are autopopulated each day;
notes from nursing staff, ancillary services personnel, some systems have a way to indicate that the results
or consulting providers as well as comments from staff were reviewed, but if not, you should document this
or family members. As discussed in Chapter 10, if an specifically. Typically, you would be able to view results
interpreter is used for any part of the visit, be sure to outside of the note, and you can select a date range
document the name of the interpreter, identification to see if there are previous study results available for
number, modality (i.e., on-site or video remote inter- comparison. Other objective information available to
preting), and the language. If the patient is not able to you are the notes written by other providers and staff;
provide information because of clinical condition or when you review others’ notes, be sure to document
advanced dementia, and so on, you should document this as well.
this specifically as well as documenting how you ob- Assessment
tained any subjective information, such as from family The Assessment section should reflect your evalu-
members, staff, or review of records. ation of all the data available and any conclusions
Objective that you could draw from them. The assessment
You will perform at least some physical examination should indicate whether the patient’s condition is
during each daily visit. It is always important to docu- better, worse, or about the same since the last visit.
ment the general assessment, providing a comparison If a patient was febrile at the time of admission but
to when you last saw the patient. It is easy to overlook is now afebrile, your entry might read, Patient now
the importance of performing or documenting the afebrile; improved. If any new problems have been
general assessment. When documenting the general identified, you need to document them. When the
assessment, consider what would be important to patient has certain comorbid conditions, such as
know about the patient’s presentation one year from hypertension or diabetes, typically you will include
now with just your documentation as a memory aid. these conditions in the Assessment section even if
If a patient is complaining of severe pain not relieved not the reason for hospitalization, and you would
by pain medication but is sitting up in the bed, alert document your assessment of the condition, such as
and smiling, watching television, and conversing well controlled or stable.
CBC
Hemoglobin Segs/bands/lymphs/monos/basos/eos
WBC MCV/MCH/MCHC
Example:
5800 82/29/34
48 259,000
Electrolytes
Sodium Chloride
Potassium Bicarbonate
Example:
138 97
4.2 23
BUN
Sodium Chloride
Creatinine
Potassium Bicarbonate
Glucose
Example:
11
138 97
1.2
4.2 23
Figure 11-1 Written shorthand for
104 documenting laboratory test results.
(Continued)
(Continued)
S: Mr. Jensen states that he rested fairly well last night. He has had adequate pain relief with PCA dosing and had only one bolus
dose. The nurse indicates that Mr. Jensen has been using the incentive spirometer every 4 hours when awake. He denies any N/V,
fever, or chills. He does not have any complaints at this time.
O: Vital signs: BP 136/86, P 92, R 16, temp is 98.8. Maximum temp since surgery has been 99.1. I&O is 1,870 mL and 1,710
mL. On exam, Mr. Jensen is awake, alert, and cooperative.
Heart: RRR
Resp: Breathing somewhat shallow, but breath sounds are without any wheezing or crackles.
ABD: Soft, nondistended. No bowel sounds audible. Minimal tenderness to palpation around operative incision. There is a small
amount of serosanguineous drainage noted on dressing. The wound edges are dry and intact, and there is no erythema or warmth
around the incision.
EXT: Lower extremities reveal no calf tenderness or swelling, no warmth to touch. Distal pulses are intact and equal bilaterally.
GU: Urinary catheter in place with 75 mL of clear yellow urine in drainage bag.
P: Remove catheter. May have BRP. Advance activity to OOB at least TID.
Signature, Credentials:
Countersignature:
Figure 11-3 First postoperative day progress note for Mr. Jensen.
note, you should write orders that correspond to any Any time you make a change in the management of
changes addressed in the plan. You might want to the patient, you should evaluate the response to that
refer back to Figure 10-8 to review the postoperative change during the next visit. For instance, based on the
orders that are currently in effect for Mr. Jensen. Now, plan documented in the POD #1 note, you wrote an
look at the Plan portion of the SOAP note shown in order to remove the urinary catheter. The next time you
Figure 11-3. You will notice that you need to write an round on Mr. Jensen, you should assess his response
order to remove the urinary catheter and another to to removal of the catheter. Was he able to void after it
change Mr. Jensen’s activity level to allow for bathroom was removed? Did he experience any urinary retention?
privileges and for him to be out of bed at least three Then document the response in the progress note.
times a day. As with any entry in the medical chart, you Figure 11-3 shows POD #1 note for Mr. Jensen. Use
should indicate the date and time, write the necessary Application Exercise 11.1 as an opportunity to write
orders, and then add your signature and title. orders based
Author on the Plan portion
ISBN # of the note.
Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
Copyright © 2019 by 6662_C_F11_03.eps
F11_03 F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/07/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W 4/C 2/C X PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p11 x 23p6 Initials
Next you will see the Subjective and Objective information to write the Assessment and Plan portions,
portions of the POD #2 note for Mr. Jensen. Use this and then write any orders necessary.
(Continued )
(Continued)
HPI: C.H. is a 76-year-old man who was admitted with fever and nausea. He developed fever 2 days ago. He complained of
urinary frequency and urgency, which he has had for several months, but symptoms were acutely worse in the past 2 days. He also
has nocturia, up 3–4 times a night. He has some mild dysuria. He denies flank pain or abdominal pain. He denies gross hematuria.
On admission, urinalysis demonstrated bacteria and hematuria.
PMH: TURP done about 10 years ago by an out-of-state urologist. Denies personal history of any GU malignancies. Remote history
of kidney stones about 25 years ago; stone passed spontaneously without intervention.
Fam Hx: father and brother with BPH; no hx of prostate cancer that he is aware of.
Social Hx: not a current smoker, although he smoked 1 PPD for 30 years. Quit 10 years ago.
ROS: all systems reviewed and are negative except as documented in the HPI.
EXAM:
Temp: 100.5
Neck: no masses
GU: no CVA tenderness. Circumcised phallus without lesions or deformity. No scrotal swelling or tenderness. Rectal exam: smooth
prostate, 40 grams, slight asymmetry with R greater than L, no nodules, no tenderness.
ASSESSMENT/PLAN:
1. BPH with LUTS: S/P TURP 10 years ago; now with urgency, frequency, nocturia. He has not been on alpha blockers,
so will start him on Flomax 0.4 mg daily at bedtime. He will need PSA as an outpatient. Will check PVR to be sure he
is not retaining urine.
2. UTI: UA nitrite + and with greater than 50 leukocytes. Await cultures; antibiotics per IM.
3. Microscopic hematuria: discussed hematuria differential diagnosis and workup, including cystoscopy, which will need
to be completed as an outpatient when he is infection free.
4. Nephrolithiasis: remote history of stones.
Thank you for the referral and for allowing us to participate in care. We will follow with you.
Juan Munoz, MD
CC: “lightheaded”
HPI: G.M. is a 74-year-old admitted from her PCP’s office. She had intermittent near-syncopal episodes for the past 2 days.
At the PCP office, EKG was done and reportedly showed A Fib with RVR, although I cannot locate that EKG to review. EKG done on
arrival here does show atrial fib with ventricular rate at 142. She denies chest pain or SOB. No DOE. Denies swelling of lower
extremities. Denies prior cardiology workup.
PMH: HTN, type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis. No prior cardiac surgery. Takes ASA daily for the past 2 years although she does not recall
why she started ASA.
Family HX: mother died of stroke at young age. Father deceased “diabetic complications.”
ROS: “lightheaded” episodically for the past 2 days; denies true syncope. Denies CP, SOB, cough, DOE, PND. Remaining systems
negative.
HEENT: unremarkable.
NECK: no JVD.
SKIN: no cyanosis.
LABS: K+ 4.2; Na 139; Trop less than 0.01 ng/mL. CBC WNL. INR 1.0
ASSESSMENT/PLAN:
New-onset A Fib/RVR: continue IV Cardizem. Will start on oral as well at 60 mg q 6 hrs po and titrate down IV dose.
CHADSVASC score = 4. Start warfarin 2 mg daily and monitor INR, goal 2–3. Stop ASA.
Katrina Denton, MD
Cardiac Consultants
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
Adenocarcinoma, right colon
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
Adenocarcinoma, right colon
DESCRIPTION:
Under endotracheal anesthesia, the patient’s abdomen was prepped and draped. A midline incision was made. The liver
was normal, except for a small cyst of the lateral aspect of the left lateral segment. The stomach, spleen, small bowel, and
retroperitoneum were normal. There were no stones in the gallbladder. The colon was remarkable for a mass in the right
colon. The right colon was mobilized and the ureter identified and preserved. The gastrocolic ligament was divided along
its right side. The ileocolic vessels were transected near their takeoff from the SMA and ligated with absorbable suture.
The remaining mesentery was divided between clamps and ligated. The bowel ends were transected using a stapler. The
resection included the right branch of the middle colic artery, and resection margins were in the distal ileum and
transverse colon. Two tissue samples were obtained, one from the distal ileum and one from the transverse colon. An
ileotransverse colostomy was performed using staples. The mesenteric defect was closed with staples. Hemostasis was
checked, and the incision was irrigated. The fascia was closed with a single layer of running #1 PDS. The subcutaneous
tissues were irrigated, and the skin was closed with Vicryl. Estimated blood loss was 80 mL.
COMPLICATIONS:
None
DISPOSITION:
The patient was transferred to the PACU in stable condition.
The local area was first anesthetized using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine.
Then the area was prepped in a sterile fashion, and utilizing a #11 blade scalpel, I made a surgical incision over the most fluctuant
area.
I then expressed any pus that I could from the area, followed by pulse irrigation with NS.
Then I used a 1/4 inch iodoform packing to pack the wound gently.
The patient tolerated the procedure well, and a dressing was placed.
The patient was informed that the packing should be removed in about 2 or 3 days. He may follow up with his PCP to have this done,
or may return to our ED for re-evaluation, and packing removal. See ED note for final disposition.
After obtaining informed consent, the area was prepped and draped in the usual fashion.
A full-thickness punch biopsy was obtained with a 4 mm punch. Wound closed with two simple interrupted sutures of 4-0 Ethilon.
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Review
1. List several questions that should be answered daily for postoperative patients.
2. A postoperative patient has been on a full liquid diet for the past 24 hours. He now has full bowel sounds
and says he is hungry. Write an order for a change in diet.
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
INDICATION: Chronic right hand with intractable pain, numbness, and tingling
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
Carpal tunnel syndrome, right hand
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
Carpal tunnel syndrome, right hand, severe
OPERATIVE INDICATIONS:
A very active 50-year-old right-hand-dominant woman has had pain, numbness, and tingling in the right hand for more
than 8 months. She had conservative medical management with splinting and exercises and did not improve. She has
noticed increasing pain and night awakening over the past 2 months, interfering with her activities of daily living.
Electromyography and nerve conduction studies confirmed median nerve compression. She failed nonoperative
management. We discussed the risks, benefits, and possible complications of operative and continued nonoperative
management, and she gave her fully informed consent to the following procedure.
The right hand was elevated and exsanguinated using an Esmarch bandage, and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mm Hg
for about 25 minutes. Volar approach to the carpal ligament was performed incising the skin with a knife and using cautery
for hemostasis. Tenotomy and forceps dissection carried out through the superficial palmar fascia, carried down to the
volar carpal ligament, which was then transected sharply with a knife and carried proximal and distal under direct vision
using the scissors and being careful to avoid the neurovascular structures.
Cautery was used for hemostasis. The nerve had an hourglass appearance where it was constricted as a result of the
compression from the ligament, and so a small amount of Celestone was dripped onto the nerve to help quiet it down. The
patient tolerated this portion of the procedure very well. The hand was then irrigated and closed with Monocryl and
Prolene, and sterile compressive dressing was applied and the tourniquet deflated.
COMPLICATIONS:
None
DISPOSITION:
To recovery room awake, alert, and in stable condition
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
1. What additional information about consent should be documented in the procedure note?
2. After critically analyzing the note and comparing it to the one presented in the chapter, what additional in-
formation should be documented in the note?
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
1. List at least three problems, symptoms, or complaints documented in the H&P that should be followed up
when rounding on C.H. the day after his admission and documented in the Subjective portion of the daily
visit note. State your rationale for including each one.
2. List at least three findings that should be documented in the Objective portion of the daily visit note, and
state your rationale for including each one.
3. List at least three problems, symptoms, or complaints documented in the H&P that should be followed up
when rounding on G.M. the day after her admission and documented in the Subjective portion of the daily
visit note. State your rationale for including each one.
4. List at least three findings that should be documented in the Objective portion of the daily visit note, and
state your rationale for including each one.
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 11. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the
content of this chapter.
BMP BP
CBC EBL
EMR H&P
HD HPI
I&O IS
JVD PCP
PMH POD
ROS SOB
WBC
285
• Follow-up instructions (who and when) or could not eat or drink for other reasons, the diet is
• Notification instructions (signs or symptoms that usually advanced to the prehospital diet over several
could signal complications) days as the patient’s condition improves and the pa-
tient meets certain criteria. Mr. Jensen has a history of
Disposition hypertension and dyslipidemia so the diet instructions
The first part of the discharge order usually indicates should reflect the need for a special diet. A reasonable
the disposition, or where the patient will go when plan for Mr. Jensen is a low-fat, low-cholesterol heart-
discharged. The patient may go home or may be trans- healthy diet.
ferred to another facility, such as an extended care or
rehabilitation facility. If the patient is discharged home Medication Reconciliation
but will need home health services, the arrangements Medication reconciliation, or medication review, is
for those services must be confirmed before the patient the process of verifying patient medication lists at a
leaves the hospital so that there is no gap in care. In point of care transition, such as hospital admission
the case of Mr. Jensen, he will return home because he and discharge, to identify which medications have
does not require specialized care. been added, discontinued, or changed relative to
pre-admission medication lists. (Medication recon-
Activity Level ciliation during the admission process is discussed in
You should specify in the discharge orders the level Chapter 10.) Performing medication reconciliation is
of activity that the patient is allowed. Mr. Jensen has a critical element of a successful discharge transition.
an abdominal incision so he should not do any heavy It also provides an opportunity for you to ensure
lifting or straining in order to prevent dehiscence of that patients understand what medications they are
the wound. An order that says, avoid heavy lifting is taking, how to take them, and why they are taking
vague, and the patient is usually not in the position to them. Once an accurate discharge medication list is
determine how much weight is too heavy. It is best to generated (Fig. 12-1), you need to communicate this
give a specific weight limit. A low weight is advised information clearly and effectively to the patient and/
for Mr. Jensen; 10 pounds is the maximum he should or caregivers, and you should provide written instruc-
lift, although some surgeons might limit the weight tions to the patient with complete dosing instructions
to 5 pounds. Often patients who have had surgery are for each medication.
instructed not to drive for a certain amount of time Just as you had to write orders for medications while
after surgery. For patients who have had abdominal the patient was hospitalized, your discharge orders
surgery, the minimum restriction is usually 1 to 2 weeks; should indicate what medications the patient will
some procedures, especially orthopedic, might require continue after discharge. First, consider what medi-
a restriction period that is even longer. Patients should cations the patient was taking before hospitalization.
specifically be told not to drive or operate machinery In Mr. Jensen’s case, he was taking Lotensin HCT
if they are taking prescription pain medication; doing 20/12.5 and Mevacor. Because these medications
so is considered driving under the influence. If there treat chronic conditions that he still has, they should
are activity restrictions that affect a patient’s ability be continued. You should write an order to continue
to return to the regular work duties, employers may usual dosages of these medications. Next, consider
require documentation of the specific limitations; that what medications might be indicated related to the
is, cannot stand for more than 2 hours at a time, no reason for the hospitalization. Mr. Jensen had major
lifting greater than 10 pounds for 4 weeks, cannot sit abdominal surgery and will need pain medication after
for more than 2 hours at a time, and so on. discharge. Usually, the same oral analgesic that was
Mr. Jensen has a surgical incision so activity orders given in the hospital will be continued at home because
should include care of the wound or specific instructions its efficacy has been established and the patient has
related to the wound. The wound can get wet but should been tolerating it without any problems. You should
not be immersed in water. Therefore, an order should write a prescription for any medications the patient
specify that he may shower but should not take a tub has not taken previously so you will need to write a
bath, sit in a hot tub, or go swimming. Mr. Jensen will prescription for an analgesic (prescription writing is
need to continue wound care at home. Instead of writing discussed in Chapter 9). Finally, consider whether
out the specific wound care orders, you may write an other medications, prescription or over-the-counter,
order for the nursing staff to instruct on wound care. are needed. Some medications that may be needed
include stool softeners, sleep aids, and nonsteroidal
Diet anti-inflammatory medications for mild to moderate
Consider what type of diet the patient should have at pain. Be sure to write a prescription for any medications
home. If a patient had surgery during the hospitalization that are not available over the counter.
Follow-Up Care and Notification 100.5˚F, redness or increased pain at incision site, cough,
Instructions difficulty breathing, or pain or swelling of the leg.
Also Mr. Jensen would follow up with his primary
Follow-up care should also be part of the discharge
care provider (PCP), Dr. Vernon Scott, because he has
orders. Specify by whom and when the patient will
chronic conditions
Author that needISBN continued
# monitoring
Author's review and
be seen. Mr. Jensen will see the surgeon, Dr. Sanders,
management that
Sullivan
typically the surgeon
6662
would not
(if needed)
provide.
OK Correx
2 weeks from the time of discharge for wound evaluation, Fig. # Document name
The timeF12_01
frame of follow-up will vary depending onDate the
removal of staples or sutures, and a routine postoperative 6662_C_F12_01.eps
patient’sArtist
overall health status Date and whether the chronic
Initials
checkup. Follow-up care should also include special in- 04/10/18
conditions are stable or unstable.
AB/CO Because
X Editor's Mr. Jensen’s
review
structions for the patient, such as notifying Dr. Sanders Check if revision
hypertension
B / W X and4/Cdyslipidemia
2nd are stable, he should
color OK Correx
if any symptoms of complications occur. You should 2/C PMS
see Dr. Scott in 1 to 2 weeks. Example 12.1 showsDate
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) the
specify which symptoms should be reported because
complete41p0 set of discharge orders for Mr. Jensen.
x 24p1 Initials
the patient may not realize the importance of certain
symptoms. Consider what postoperative complications
EXAMPLE 12.1
might occur and what symptoms would be associated
with those complications. Any patient who has had 1. Discharge to home.
major abdominal surgery is at risk for developing 2. No lifting greater than 10 pounds; no driving,
wound infection, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, e xercising, or strenuous activity until released by
or pulmonary embolus. Symptoms that correspond Dr. Sanders.
to these conditions include fever, redness or increased 3. May shower but no tub bath, hot tub use, or
pain at the incision site, difficulty breathing, and pain in swimming until released by Dr. Sanders.
the leg. “Fever” is somewhat subjective (just like “heavy 4. Instruct on routine wound care.
lifting” discussed earlier), so it is best to state a specific 5. Low-fat, low-cholesterol hear t-healthy diet.
temperature that would be of concern. A typical order 6. Continue Lotensin HCT 20/12.5 and Mevacor
would read, notify Dr. Sanders of temperature greater than at home.
7. Ibuprofen 800 mg PO q6h with food PRN mild for participating in federal reimbursement programs,
to moderate pain. for example, require that hospital records be completed
8. Oxycodone 10 mg 1 or 2 tablets PO q4h PRN within 30 days following the patient’s discharge. Hospitals
moderate to severe pain. may have their own requirement for when discharge
9. Colace 100 mg PO twice daily for 1 week to summaries must be done, and the person responsible
p revent constipation. for completing the discharge summary may be placed
10. Follow-up with Dr. Sanders in 2 weeks. on suspension if it is not done within the required time
11. Notify Dr. Sanders if temperature greater than frame. Usually the discharge summary is dictated, and
100.5˚F, redness or increased pain at incision site, transcribed copies are placed in the chart and sent to
cough, difficulty breathing, or pain or swelling in the admitting physician and other consulting provid-
the legs. ers as indicated. In some facilities, voice-recognition
12. Follow-up with Dr. Scott in 1 month for software programs may be used instead of dictation
routine care. that requires transcription.
One sample format is provided here, and we will
again refer to Mr. Jensen as we discuss the discharge
summary. The format used for discharge summaries will
MEDICOLEGAL ALERT ! vary from institution to institution. The headings shown
below (and in Table 12-1) indicate what information
Failure to provide adequate follow-up instructions is should be part of the discharge summary.
one of the leading causes of litigation against health-care
providers in both inpatient and outpatient settings. It is • Date of admission
your responsibility to anticipate what complications the • Date of discharge
patient might develop and to educate the patient on the • Admitting diagnosis (or diagnoses)
signs and symptoms that could indicate such a complica- • Discharge diagnosis (or diagnoses)
tion. Patients cannot be expected to know what signs or • Attending physician
symptoms need to be reported. Follow-up instructions • Primary provider and consulting physician(s)
and the documentation of such instructions should be (if any)
as specific as possible. It is a good idea to verify that the • Procedures (if any)
patient has understood the follow-up instructions by • Brief history, pertinent physical examination find-
asking the patient to repeat back to you what he or she ings, and pertinent laboratory values (at time of
has heard about the follow-up instructions. Then docu- admission)
ment that the patient appeared to understand follow-up • Hospital course
instructions. It is also recommended that you provide • Condition at discharge
follow-up instructions in writing as well because the • Disposition
patient is not likely to remember everything that was • Discharge medications
said verbally. Include family members or others who may • Discharge instructions and follow-up instructions
be caring for the patient after discharge and document
who, besides the patient, received follow-up instructions. Dates of Admission and Discharge
If the patient is non-English speaking or has low level En- The dates of admission and discharge are easily deter-
glish proficiency, you should provide the written instruc- mined from the medical record.
tions in the patient’s preferred language.
Admitting and Discharge Diagnosis
(or Diagnoses)
Discharge Summary The admitting diagnosis can be found in the initial
admitting orders. The discharge diagnosis might be
The discharge summary is a synopsis of the patient’s the same as or different from the admitting diagnosis
entire hospitalization and is required for any hospital or might include several diagnoses. If you have not
stay longer than 24 hours. Often, members of the been following the patient on a regular basis, you may
health-care team, insurance carriers or other third-party have to read through the entire chart to identify all
payers, and quality assurance personnel request a copy the diagnoses. The discharge diagnosis should be the
of the discharge summary. The discharge summary primary reason for hospitalization; secondary diagnoses
must be completed before the hospital can submit for will be listed as well. For Mr. Jensen, adenocarcinoma
payment. For these reasons, you need to complete the of the colon is the discharge diagnosis with secondary
discharge summary in a timely manner. Regulations diagnoses of hypertension and dyslipidemia.
usually included (even if normal) as well as any ab- summary. It takes practice in the art and science of
normal findings from chemistry studies, such as the medicine and documentation to develop a concise and
carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) of 17 for Mr. Jensen. informative hospital course narrative without being
His dyslipidemia is a chronic problem so you could too verbose or leaving out important details. Think of
document the total cholesterol and triglyceride values; this section as the story of the course of events of the
however, because this chronic condition is not likely to patient’s hospitalization. Summarize the daily progress
have an effect on this hospitalization, it is not necessary of the patient and the patient’s response to treatment
to include these values. You would also document in as documented in the daily progress notes. A great
the discharge summary any abnormality that needed deal of detail usually is not needed but include enough
correction before surgery or that would significantly information to avoid ambiguity or an incomplete record
affect the patient’s overall hospitalization. of the patient’s hospital stay. Some providers summa-
rize the events of each hospital day; this format works
Hospital Course well when the stay is brief and the patient’s recovery is
The hospital course is the most important part of the uneventful. This approach is not recommended if the
discharge summary. It also can be the most difficult hospitalization is longer than 5 days or if the patient
part to document. Up to this point, you have taken the has multiple problems. In those instances, you might
information in the discharge summary directly from construct the narrative to summarize the details of
other sections of the medical record. The hospital course each problem and the patient’s response to treatment
narrative is a summary of information that is already for each problem. Some hospitals may require the use
recorded in daily progress notes, consultants’ notes, or of a specific format. To gain experience summarizing
procedure notes, but the challenge is learning what to details of a patient’s hospital stay, complete Application
include and what can be omitted from the discharge Exercise 12.1.
Condition at Discharge their addiction. It seems likely that leaving AMA puts
Your discharge summary should also include a specific patients at increased risk for adverse health outcomes.
assessment of the patient’s condition that should in- This concern is supported by several studies that found
dicate why the patient is ready for discharge. Avoid that patients who leave AMA have significantly higher
one-word descriptions such as stable or improved. In re-admission rates than other patients. Glasgow and
the case of Mr. Jensen, you could state, Mr. Jensen is colleagues (2010) conducted a study of general medical
tolerating a regular diet, has adequate pain relief from oral patients who left AMA. The study sample included
analgesics, and he is able to ambulate without assistance 1,930,947 medical admissions to 129 hospitals from
and to perform activities of daily living. His postoperative 2004 to 2008; 32,819 patients (1.70%) were discharged
recovery is progressing as expected without complications. AMA. These patients had a higher 30-day re-admission
rate and higher 30-day mortality rate.
Disposition, Discharge Medications, When a patient states a desire to leave the hospital
Discharge Instructions, and Follow-Up before being ready for discharge, it is your responsibility
Instructions as the admitting (or attending) physician to determine
if the patient has capacity to make informed decisions.
The disposition indicates where the patient goes when The law dictates that a patient who has capacity has
leaving the hospital. If the patient is being transferred the right to refuse medical care, and treatment without
to another facility, you should document the reason consent may be considered battery. When a patient signs
for transfer. The discharge medications, instructions, out AMA, he or she is exercising this right to refuse
and follow-up were discussed in the previous section care. However, if a patient is not capable of making an
on writing discharge orders. List the medications and informed decision, then you cannot ethically or legally
document any specific instructions in this part of the allow a discharge that may imperil the patient’s life or
discharge summary. health. A patient’s right to refuse care can be exercised
A discharge summary for Mr. Jensen is shown in only if a patient has decision-making capacity. An
Figure 12-2. After reading it, try to answer these ques- assessment of decision-making capacity focuses on
tions: When did bowel sounds return? Did Mr. Jensen a patient’s ability to understand and communicate a
have effective pain relief from the oral analgesic? Did rational decision. This determination centers around
he experience any postoperative complications? What whether a patient can manipulate information regard-
medications will Mr. Jensen take at home? When will ing a specific task or procedure. It does not require
Mr. Jensen see Dr. Sanders? A well-written discharge that a patient be free of mental illness or delusions.
summary will answer most questions a reader might To have capacity the patient must have the ability to
have about the events of the hospitalization. express a choice and communicate that choice, the
ability to understand relevant information, the ability
to appreciate the significance of the information and
Patient Leaving Before its consequences, and the ability to manipulate infor-
Discharge mation. Capacity is not the same thing as competence.
Competence is a legal determination made by a court;
Two events requiring careful documentation are patients capacity can be evaluated by the hospitalist or attending
leaving the hospital against medical advice (AMA) physician. If you are not sure if a patient has capacity,
and elopement. then you may consult a psychiatrist to evaluate the
patient and determine capacity. If the patient’s capacity
AMA is confirmed, then the patient may leave. Even if the
If a patient is advised to remain in the hospital and patient is leaving AMA, you should make every effort
he or she still chooses to leave, the patient is said to to provide adequate discharge instructions and arrange
be leaving AMA. Patients leave AMA for a variety of for follow-up care. Remember to document the patient’s
reasons. When asked, they most commonly cite family decision to leave AMA in the medical record. Typically,
problems or emergencies; personal or financial obliga- the patient is asked to sign a form indicating that he or
tions; feeling bored, fed up, or well enough to leave; she has decided to leave AMA. An example of such a
or dissatisfaction with their treatment. Because most form is shown in Figure 12-3. If the patient is deemed
hospitals are smoke-free facilities, patients often leave to lack capacity, then you should keep him or her in
simply because they want to smoke. If this is the case, the hospital for further treatment, even if involuntary
the patient may be offered nicotine-replacement ther- admission is necessary.
apy and, if needed, anti-anxiety medication. Although Your documentation should include the name and
many patients who leave AMA have substance abuse relationship to the patient (if applicable) of any witnesses
problems, few of them attribute their decision to leave to to the conversation about the patient’s possible discharge.
Admitting Diagnosis:
1. Adenocarcinoma of right colon
2. HTN
3. Dyslipidemia
Discharge Diagnoses:
1. Right hemicolectomy
2. Adenocarcinoma of the colon
3. HTN well controlled
4. Dyslipidemia, fairly well controlled
BRIEF HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: Mr. Jensen is a 67-year-old Caucasian male who was referred to me after being
diagnosed with colon cancer. The patient underwent a diagnostic colonoscopy with biopsies, and pathology report indicated
adenocarcinoma. After discussing with Mr. Jensen and his wife the types of treatment available, they both agreed to an elective right
hemicolectomy.
PMH: Medical hx includes HTN and dyslipidemia. Surgical history includes repair of right rotator cuff 24 years ago and left inguinal
herniorrhaphy 15 years ago. Current medications include Lotensin HCT 20/12.5 once daily and Mevacor 20 mg daily. He also takes
a multivitamin daily and fish oil supplements twice daily. Patient is allergic to PENICILLIN, which causes a rash.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
GENERAL: BP 142/80, P 86 and regular, Temp 97.8 orally. Current weight 174 pounds. WDWN male, A & O x 3.
HEENT: Unremarkable.
CV: Heart RRR without murmurs, gallops, or rubs. No JVD or peripheral edema. Distal pulses intact.
ABD: Soft, nontender. No masses or organomegaly. Bowel sounds physiological in all four quadrants. No guarding or rebound noted.
RECTAL/GU: Prostate nontender, not enlarged. Stool guaiac positive. External genitalia exam reveals a circumcised male,
both testes descended. No testicular or scrotal masses.
LABORATORY:
CBC: WBC 5,800; Hct 48; Hgb 16. Peripheral smear shows normochromic, normocytic cells, differential WNL. Chemistry panel
shows triglycerides of 178; LDL of 208; total cholesterol of 267; CEA of 17; otherwise WNL. Chest x-ray: borderline cardiomegaly,
no consolidations of effusions.
UA: Negative.
ECG: Normal sinus rhythm with rate of 84. No ectopy, no ischemic changes.
HOSPITAL COURSE: Elective right hemicolectomy was performed XX/XX/XXXX without complications. Intra-operative findings were
consistent with adenocarcinoma with no evidence of metastatic disease. IV of D51/2 NS and PCA with morphine for postoperative
pain management. On POD #1, patient did not voice any complaints. Blood pressure was 138/88, heart rate 92 max, respirations
20 and shallow. Max temp of 99.1. On exam, good breath sounds in all lung fields, no wheezing or crackles. Heart RRR. Abd soft
and nondistended. Incision dry and intact without erythema or drainage. No calf tenderness or swelling. Orders to discontinue
catheter. On POD #2, patient remained afebrile, max temp of 98.8, all other vital signs stable, breath sounds clear, heart RRR. Faint
bowel sounds were heard throughout. Wound healing well without signs of infection. IV analgesics discontinued, changed to oral
Percocet. Restart prehospital meds. Diet advanced to clear liquids. On POD #3, patient reported good pain relief with PO meds and
tolerating prehospital meds without difficulty. No nausea or vomiting with liquid diet. Full liquid diet was tolerated well. Patient reports
having bowel movement (BM) this morning. Remained afebrile and all vital signs stable. No complaints. Lung and heart exam
unchanged. No abdominal tenderness. Wound edges dry without erythema. Patient returned to regular diet. By POD #4, patient still
afebrile, VS were WNL, wound healing without complications or signs of infection, tolerating regular diet and meds without
difficulty. Patient ready for discharge.
(Continued)
Author ISBN #
Author's review
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Sullivan (if needed)
6662 OK Correx
Fig. # Document name
F12_02_p1 6662_C_F12_02_p1.eps Date
Initials
Artist Date
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
2nd color OK Correx
B/W X 4/C 2/C PMS
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
12_Sullivan_Ch12.indd 292 7/5/18 8:45 PM
Initials
Chapter 12 Discharging Patients from the Hospital | 293
DISCHARGE INSTRUCTIONS: Patient will follow up with Dr. Sanders in 1 week for suture removal and will follow up with Dr. Scott
in 3 weeks for routine care. Continue wound care as instructed. He may shower and get the wound wet but should not take tub
baths or swim. He should be on a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet. Activity level limited to no lifting over 10 pounds, no pulling or
straining, until appointment with Dr. Sanders. Patient to notify Dr. Sanders if he develops temp greater than 100.5ºF, SOB, swelling in
legs, leg pain, or severe abdominal pain, cramping, or rectal bleeding.
MEDICATIONS: Patient will continue Mevacor and Lotensin HCT. Given prescription for Percocet 5 mg, 1–2 po every 4–6 hr PRN
pain. Mr. Jensen was advised not to drive, drink alcohol, or operate any machinery while taking the Percocet. He should also drink
lots of water to help avoid constipation and may take Colace 100 mg (OTC) if needed.
I understand that I am leaving the above facility against medical advice. I have been informed of the risks associated with leaving
the facility and, knowing these risks, I wish to leave this facility. I assume full responsibility for my own care and welfare.
By signing this form, I release the attending physician, the facility, and its personnel from all liability for any adverse effects, which
may result from my leaving against medical advice.
If the patient is unable to consent by reason of age or some other factor, state the reasons: _________________________________
Author ISBN # Author's review
Sullivan 6662 (if needed)
OK Correx
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fig. # Document name
F12_02_p2 6662_C_F12_02_p2.eps Date
Signature of legally authorized representative: _____________________________________________________________________
Artist Date
Initials
03/06/18
AB Editor's review
Check if revision
Witness: __________________________________________________________________________________________________
2nd color OK Correx
B/W X 4/C 2/C PMS
Relation to Patient: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Final Size (Width X Depth in Picas) Date
40p12 x 8p8 Initials
Attending Physician Signature: _________________________________________________________________________________
Use direct quotes of the patient’s statements to explain of him remaining in the hospital, primarily, continued
why the patient wants to leave. Do not document your investigation into the etiology of the chest pain he is
own interpretation of why the patient is leaving or include experiencing and pain relief. The patient has capacity
any judgmental or derogatory remarks about the patient. and understands the risks of leaving, including serious
Make every effort to arrange follow-up care for the patient. cardiac disease, permanent disability, and sudden cardiac
Document the discharge instructions and follow-up care death. Mr. Sanford had an oppor tunity to ask questions
just as you would for any other patient. Example 12.2 shows about his condition, and I answered them to the best
one way to document a patient’s decision to leave AMA. of my ability. He has been informed that he may return
for care at any time. A follow-up appointment with his
EXAMPLE 12.2 PCP has been scheduled for 2 days from now.
Signature of attending physician
xx/xx/xxxx, 1548. I was informed by Karen Macayo, RN,
nurse manager of telemetr y 5B unit, that Mr. Sanford has
decided to leave the hospital against medical advice. He
states, “I am a single father and I just cannot stay here Elopement
and leave my kids alone. My sister was taking care of Elopement occurs when a patient leaves the hospital
them, but she has to leave.” We discussed the benefits without being discharged and without the patient
informing staff of the desire to leave. Eloping patients confirmed that he was not there. Nursing staff stated
are often at risk for serious harm, and there are many that Mr. Sanford had not indicated to them that he
cases in which patient elopement has resulted in was planning to leave. Several overhead pages asking
death. Because patients do not inform hospital staff Mr. Sanford to return to his room were made without
of their intent to leave, there is no chance to discuss success. Security was notified, and they checked the
the risks of leaving and benefits of remaining in the hospital grounds. Mr. Sanford was not found and is
hospital for treatment. Elopement is different from presumed to have eloped.
wandering, which is used to describe when a patient Signature of attending physician
strays beyond the view or control of staff without
the intent of leaving (often because of cognitive
impairment).
If a patient elopes, you should document the date Summary
and time that you were informed of the elopement as
well as who notified you. The documentation should As a health-care provider, you should be aware of clinical
contain only facts and not speculation on why the and nonclinical factors that increase a patient’s risk for
patient eloped. A discharge summary is still required. re-admission, and you should weigh all these factors
In the disposition part of the discharge summary, state carefully when deciding that a patient is ready for dis-
that the patient eloped. An elopement prevents the charge. Once the patient is deemed ready for discharge,
patient from receiving specific discharge instructions specific orders are required. In addition to the Admission
and follow-up care information, and it is customary History and Physical, the Discharge Summary is one
to document that you were unable to provide this of the most important documents that will be gener-
information to the patient. ated during a patient’s hospitalization. This summary
Suppose that Mr. Sanford, the patient mentioned in should communicate important events of the patient’s
Example 12.2, had eloped rather than telling the staff hospital stay, including admitting problem, response to
that he was leaving AMA. Once the staff discovered treatment, and development of any new problems as well
the elopement and informed the physician, this was as the management of those problems. The medication
documented in the patient’s medical record as shown reconciliation done at the time of discharge is extremely
in Example 12.3. important and should ensure that patients know exactly
which of their prehospital medications to continue and
EXAMPLE 12.3 which, if any, should be discontinued. The medication
reconciliation also should detail any new medications
xx/xx/xxxx, 1948. I received a call from Karen M acayo, prescribed, why prescribed, and how long the medication
head nurse of telemetr y 5B unit, regarding Mr. San- should be taken. At the time of discharge, you should
ford. The nur se who was assigned to care for him provide the patient with specific information related
was making rounds when she first came on shift and to care at home, follow-up appointments, and diet and
noticed that Mr. Sanford was not in his room. His IV activity. Also, you should educate patients about any
had been disconnected, and the tubing was lying on symptoms that they should report to you or another
the bed. The IV catheter was still attached, and a small health-care provider. Provide written discharge instruc-
pool of blood was noted on the bedding. The oxygen tions to the patient or caregiver, in the patient’s preferred
tubing was found on the bedside table. A hospital language, so that the patient can review the information
gown was found on the bed. The nurse checked the after discharge. To reinforce the content of this chapter,
imaging schedule to be sure that the patient was not please complete the worksheets that follow. And be sure
in that depar tment; no imaging studies had been or- to review A ppendix A, the Document Library, for full
dered for Mr. Sanford, and a call to the depar tment case examples of patient documentation.
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
1. List three clinical risk factors associated with re-admission within 30 days of discharge.
2. List four nonclinical risk factors associated with re-admission within 30 days of discharge.
4. List three components that should be addressed when instructing a patient on activity at the time of a
hospital discharge.
7. List at least three diagnoses for patients who are most likely to leave a hospital AMA.
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Discharge Summary—R.H.
PATIENT: R.H. MR#: 427-08-733
DISCHARGE DIAGNOSES:
1. Chest pain. No MI.
2. Right hip fracture due to fall in hospital, s/p ORIF.
3. Right fifth metacarpal fracture.
4. CAD with prior stents.
5. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
6. Diabetes mellitus, type 2.
7. Acute renal failure, resolved.
8. Mild abnormality of liver enzymes, history of chronic hepatitis B.
9. Malnutrition.
10. UTI, treated.
11. Encephalopathy with acute illness postoperative delirium in addition to dementia.
ATTENDING PHYSICIAN:
Reginald Dykstra, MD
Consulting Physicians:
Connor Everett, DO; Cardiology
Burton Samuelson, MD; Neurology
Wayne Billingsly, MD; Orthopedics
Edward Dobrison, MD; Psychiatry
For details of the presenting history and physical examination, please refer to the H&P in the chart.
Hospital Course:
In brief, the patient is an 84-year-old man. He was initially admitted from the emergency department with complaint of chest
pain. He had a history of CAD and prior stents. An MI was ruled out with serial enzymes. He did have some paroxysmal
atrial fibrillation, then stayed in sinus rhythm. He was seen during the hospitalization by Dr. Everett from Cardiology. The
first night of admission, the patient got up unassisted owing to confusion, fell, and had a fracture of the right hip. He was
treated by Dr. Billingsly for orthopedic surgery. He also had some acute renal failure when he came in the hospital probably
due to dehydration; this returned to normal. The patient underwent ORIF of the hip. He had no further chest pains. His
diabetes was monitored and covered. He was seen by Dr. Samuelson for Neurology and Dr. Dobrison for Psychiatry. He
was quite agitated and assaultive at times. They were managing him with medications and recommended an inpatient
psychiatry unit. The patient will be transferred to an inpatient psychiatric facility when a bed is available. His condition is
improved and stable at time of transfer. Prognosis is fair.
Medications:
Risperidone 1 mg three times a day; Levaquin 250 mg daily; Lactulose twice daily; thiamine 100 mg a day; nitroglycerin
ointment 2%, 1 inch every 6 hours; metoprolol 50 mg orally twice a day; enoxaparin 80 mg subcutaneous daily; and
multivitamin once a day. He is on sliding scale insulin. He will be up as directed by physical therapy. He will be on his
heart-healthy diabetic diet.
2. Which discharge diagnoses listed are not addressed in the narrative of the hospital course?
3. R.H. will be transferred to a psychiatric facility. If you were a provider at the receiving facility, what criticisms
would you have of this discharge summary?
4. What findings support that R.H. is ready for discharge from the hospital?
5. Refer to Figure 12-2, Discharge Summary for Mr. Jensen. Identify at least three elements included in that
discharge summary that are not included in R.H.’s discharge summary.
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
ADMITTING DIAGNOSIS: Quadriceps tendon rupture of the right knee s/p prior total knee arthroplasty.
DISCHARGE DIAGNOSIS: Quadriceps tendon rupture of the right knee s/p prior total knee arthroplasty.
HOSPITAL COURSE: The patient was admitted on 07/14/XXXX after he was noted to have an extensor mechanism rupture. He
presented to the ED initially. Internal Medicine was consulted for medical optimization and clearance. On 07/15/XXXX, he was taken
to the OR, where he underwent a quadricepsplasty of the right leg for apparent augmentation of the quadriceps rupture with allograft
augmentation, a lateral release, and an anterior synovectomy. The patient tolerated the procedure well. He was placed in a long-leg
bulky Robert Jones dressing. He was admitted to the orthopedic unit and was allowed weight-bearing as tolerated in the splint. He
had daily physical therapy. Intra-operative cultures were obtained. Initial Gram stain was negative. Final cultures were negative at 72
hours. On POD #2, the patient’s hemoglobin dropped to 9.0, and he was transfused with 2 units packed RBCs. He was noted to have
decreased magnesium and potassium, which were replaced. On POD #3, the patient was able to ambulate 200 feet with physical
therapy and was stable for discharge home.
DIET: Regular
DISCHARGE MEDICATIONS:
1. Colace 100 mg bid
2. Ferrous sulfate 325 mg bid
3. Aspirin 325 mg bid
4. Multivitamin daily
5. Tramadol 50 mg every 6 hours
DISCHARGE INSTRUCTIONS: The patient is discharged home. He will be weight-bearing as tolerated in the splint. He will present
next week to be placed in a long-leg cast. He will remain on aspirin therapy for 6 weeks for DVT prophylaxis. All questions were
answered and discussed, and the patient is agreeable.
2. If you were Dr. Knowles, the patient’s primary care provider, what information would you like to know that
is not included in this discharge summary?
3. What type of culture was obtained, and what is the significance of the results reported in the discharge
summary?
4. What findings support that H.O. is ready for discharge from the hospital?
5. What specific information is missing from the discharge instruction section of the summary?
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
• Date of discharge
• Attending physician
• Brief history, pertinent physical examination findings, and pertinent laboratory values (at time of admission)
• Hospital course
• Condition at discharge
• Disposition
• Discharge medications
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
• Diet
• Medication reconciliation, including prehospital medications that should be resumed or stopped as well as any
new medications
Name: �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Abbreviations
These abbreviations were introduced in Chapter 12. Beside each, write the meaning as indicated by the
context of the chapter.
PCP ��������������������������������������
Now that you are familiar with the process of documentation, you can review some patient files. In the following
pages you will find the pertinent documents for a number of patients, including SOAP notes, consult notes, and
notes for hospice and palliative care, so that you can follow each patient’s episode of care from start to finish.
309
Patient: M.S.
The next five documents pertain to patient M.S., a 73-year-old man admitted for inpatient care. The first d
ocument
is the admission History and Physical Examination by the hospitalist, Dr. Daniel Krackov. Following are consul-
tation notes from four different specialties (gastroenterology, cardiology, neurology, and orthopedics) that address
various problems that arise during M.S.’s hospital stay.
Patient: M.S.
Result Type: ADMISSION HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Performed by: Daniel Krackov, MD
Encounter Info: M.S., 4853105, PUMC, Inpatient
Date of Birth: 2/4/19XX
7. Diverticulosis
8. Inguinal hernia, right
9. Chronic back and neck pain
10. Spinal stenosis
11. Gout
12. Glaucoma
13. History of mild cardiac enzyme elevation
14. Esophagitis
15. Chronic chest pain with chronic troponin elevation
16. Gastroesophageal reflux disease
Family History:
Father died of COPD at age 55. Mother is 82, still living with no significant medical history.
Social History:
He is single, lives with his girlfriend. Has two grown children. He requires assistance with IADLs. He denies
tobacco use, alcohol use, or illicit drugs.
Home Medications:
1. Prazosin 4 mg PO nightly
2. Vitamin B12 1,000 mcg PO daily
3. Colchicine 0.6 mg bid
4. Losartan 50 mg daily
5. Multivitamin 1 pill daily
6. Hydralazine 25 mg PO tid
7. Sotalol 80 mg PO bid
8. Amlodipine 10 mg PO daily
9. Lisinopril 40 mg PO daily
10. Allopurinol 200 mg daily
11. Dorzolamide-timolol ophthalmic
12. Bimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic
13. Brimonidine 0.2% ophthalmic
14. Saline drops OTC PRN
15. He also takes Medrol Dosepak PRN gouty attack
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vitals: Blood pressure 104/68, O2 saturation 97% on room air; pulse 92, respiratory rate 16, temperature 38.6.
General: Pleasant elderly male in moderate distress due to leg pain and nausea.
HEENT: Anicteric sclerae. Pupils equally reactive to light and accommodation. Extraocular muscles intact.
Ears clear. Nose with clear rhinorrhea. Oropharynx clear.
Neck: Supple, no JVD, no thyromegaly, carotid bruit, and no lymphadenopathy of the cervical or supraclavicu-
lar chain.
Respiratory: No labored breathing, coarse breath sounds, scattered rhonchi bilaterally.
Cardiovascular: Rate and rhythm regular. Normal S1, S2. No murmur or gallop.
Abdomen: Soft, nondistended, no hepatosplenomegaly. Diffusely tender but without guarding. Normal bowel
sounds.
Extremities: No cyanosis, clubbing, or edema. Obvious tenderness to palpation of the distal thigh on the right side.
Neurological: Alert and oriented × 4. Cranial nerves II–XII normal. Motor and sensory examined and the
patient has severe sensory deficit to the right foot, also has reduced motor strength to the right lower extrem-
ity. Deep tendon reflexes sluggish to the right side.
Integumentary: No rash.
Psychiatric: Appropriate behavior.
LABORATORY DATA:
WBC 3.4, hemoglobin 12.3, hematocrit is 36.7, platelet 174, PT 13.2, INR 1.0, PTT 24, glucose 110, BUN 16,
creatinine 1.08, sodium 141, potassium 3.7, chloride 103, CO2 24. Cardiac enzymes: CK 48, troponin 0.17, and
the patient has history of chronically elevated troponin. Urinalysis negative for urinary tract infection.
IMAGING:
EKG by my interpretation with NSR rate of 84 and no ischemic changes. CT of abdomen and pelvis shows some
chronic inflammatory changes of the sigmoid colon consistent with diverticulosis but there is no evidence of acute
diverticulitis. The appendix appears enlarged but is stable compared to previous CT.
Daniel Krackov, MD
CONSULTATION REPORT:
Service: Gastroenterology
Date of Birth: 2/4/19XX
Requesting Physician: Daniel Krackov, MD
Reason for Consultation: Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea
a GI workup recently, including EGD and colonoscopy remarkable for erosive esophagitis, a few colon polyps,
and hemorrhoids and sigmoid diverticulosis. In the emergency department here, he had a CT angio of the chest,
abdomen, and pelvis, concluding no acute abnormality. Liver is enlarged with hepatic steatosis. Normal-appearing
pancreas, no changes of chronic pancreatitis described. Appendix is abnormally enlarged in the right lower quadrant
measuring 1.3 cm without associated inflammatory changes to suggest appendicitis. This is unchanged from prior
imaging study. There are a few colonic diverticula involving the distal ileum, fat-containing right inguinal hernia,
extensive atherosclerotic changes throughout the abdominal aorta extending into the iliac vasculature, inferior
vena cava filter and subtle wall thickening involving the distal esophagus.
Family History:
Father COPD. Mother also had diverticulosis. Specifically, no hx of gastric or colorectal cancers.
Social History:
Lives with his girlfriend of many years. Has primary care provider. Formerly a heavy drinker but quit drinking
more than 6 years ago. Denies ever smoking or using illegal drugs.
Home Medications:
Sotalol
Ranexa
Keppra
B12
Protonix
Prazosin
Creon
Florastor
Morphine
Digoxin
Amlodipine
Carafate
Prescription eye drops for glaucoma
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vitals: Pulse 108, BP 142/65, afebrile. Weight is 93 kg, BMI is 24.46.
General: A&O, well developed, converses appropriately, no acute distress.
HEENT: Normocephalic. Normal hearing. Sclerae are anicteric. Conjunctivae pink. Mucous membranes moist.
Dentures are well fitting and in good repair.
Neck: Supple, full ROM. No masses.
Respiratory: Clear to auscultation.
Cardiovascular: Normal S1, S2 with regular rate and rhythm.
Abdomen: Soft. Generalized tenderness but no guarding or rebound tenderness. Bowel sounds present all quadrants.
LABORATORY DATA:
Remarkable for a troponin of 0.68. WBC 3.4, hemoglobin 12.4, platelets 174. All electrolytes are normal. AST
91, total bilirubin 1.2, alk phos 96, lipase 315.
IMAGING:
CT angio of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, concluding no acute abnormality.
Audrey West, MD
CONSULTATION REPORT:
Service: Cardiology
Date of Birth: 02/04/19XX
Requesting Physician: Daniel Krackov, MD
Reason for Consultation: Elevated cardiac enzymes
Family History:
Mother with a history of anxiety. Otherwise, no pertinent family history.
Social History:
Denies smoking. Quit drinking alcohol approximately 6 years ago. Denies any illicit drug use. Currently with poor
functional status given his right OA.
Home Medications:
1. Prazosin 4 mg PO nightly
2. Vitamin B12 1,000 mcg PO daily
3. Hydralazine 25 mg PO tid
4. Sotalol 80 mg PO bid
5. Amlodipine 10 mg PO daily
6. Lisinopril 40 mg PO daily
7. Allopurinol 200 mg daily
8. Dorzolamide-timolol ophthalmic
9. Bimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic
10. Brimonidine 0.2%
11. Saline drops OTC PRN
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vitals: Blood pressure 121/86, respiratory rate 16, heart rate 91, oxygen saturation 100% on room air, height
196 cm, weight 102 kg, BMI 26, temperature 36.6 degrees Celsius.
General: Patient is sitting up in bed, pleasant and conversant, alert and oriented × 4, in no acute distress. Co-
operative during the exam.
HEENT: Moist oropharynx without exudates or erythema. Pupils equal, round, and reactive to light bilaterally.
No scleral injection, normal conjunctivae.
Neck: No masses or carotid bruits appreciated. Normal thyroid size to palpation.
Respiratory: No increased respiratory effort. N ormal AP diameter. Breath sounds without wheezing or rhon-
chi in all lung fields.
Cardiovascular: Heart regular rate and rhythm without murmurs, rubs, or gallop. Normal S1, S2.
Abdomen: Slightly hyperactive bowel sounds. Nontender to palpation diffusely. No rebound tenderness. No
hepatosplenomegaly appreciated.
Skin: No erythema or induration appreciated around the right knee, however, also no other rashes or lesions
appreciated.
LABORATORY DATA:
WBC 3.4, hemoglobin 12.3, hematocrit is 36.7, platelet 174, PT 13.2, INR 1.0, PTT 24, glucose 113, BUN 10,
creatinine 1.11, sodium 141, potassium 3.7, chloride 103, CO2 24. Mild AST elevation to 91, CK of 48, troponin
of 0.17, UA with some mild proteinuria and increased hyaline casts.
IMAGING:
1. Chest x-ray showed no acute intrapulmonary process.
2. Right x-ray of the knee, 3 view, showed moderate degeneration in the medial compartment and some asso-
ciated soft tissue swelling.
3. EKG showed sinus rhythm at a rate of 92 with normal axis and QRS intervals. There are ST segment de-
pressions in the inferolateral leads consistent with previous EKGs date back to 4/25/2011. No changes
from previous EKGs.
Adam Olsen, DO
CONSULTATION REPORT:
Service: Neurology
Date of Birth: 2/4/19XX
Requesting Physician: Daniel Krackov, MD
Reason for Consultation: Lower extremity weakness
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Family History:
Father: Emphysema, COPD.
Social History:
Never smoked; never any substance abuse, requires assistance with ADLs, chronic pain, uses walker, elevated toilet
seat, bedside commode, shower chair. Lives with girlfriend. PCP Dr. Kennedy.
Home Medications:
See home list.
Amlodipine 10 mg PO q am
Brimonidine ophthalmic drops both eyes, bid
Digoxin 125 mcg PO q am
Dorzolamide ophthalmic drops both eyes bid
Florastor 250 mg PO tid
Latanoprost ophthalmic drops both eyes q HS
Levetiracetam 500 mg bid
MS Contin 30 mg PO q 12 hours
Pancrelipase 1 cap PO tid with meals
Pantoprazole 40 mg PO bid
Prazosin 4 mg PO q HS
Ranolazine 500 mg PO bid
Sotalol 80 mg PO bid
Clonidine 0.1 mg PO q 4 hours PRN blood pressure – see instructions
Zofran 4 mg/2 mL IV push q 6 hours PRN nausea and vomiting
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vitals: Temp 36.8°C, blood pressure 115/87, heart rate 80, respiratory rate 16, SpO2 100%.
General: Alert and oriented.
HEENT: Normocephalic.
Respiratory: Normal rate, normal effort.
Cardiovascular: Normal rate, regular rhythm.
Abdomen: Soft.
Neurological: Alert, oriented. Normal sensory, normal motor function. No focal deficits. Cranial nerves II–XII
are grossly intact. PERRL. Brisk pupillary reaction to direct light. Diminished reflexes throughout.
Musculoskeletal: Normal range of motion.
LABORATORY DATA:
WBC 4.3, RBC 4.17, hemoglobin 12.2, hematocrit 38.1, platelet 136, sodium 138, potassium 3.9, CO2 23, g lucose
108, BUN 10, creatinine 1.08, magnesium 2.2, calcium 8.8, albumin 3.8, alkaline phos 11, AST 35, ALT 28,
bilirubin total 0.9, APTT 26, INR 1.0, Protime 14.4, CK total 81, troponin-I 0.65.
IMAGING:
Chest, portable, single view: No evidence of acute cardiopulmonary disease.
Pelvis: Two-view x-rays with postoperative changes consistent with total left hip arthroplasty. Moderate osteoar-
thritic change of right hip is present. No visible pelvic fracture. Degenerative changes and postoperative changes
lower lumbar sacral spine is present. Vascular calcification seen within the pelvis.
CT head/brain W/O contrast: Diffuse cerebral volume loss. The lateral, third and fourth ventricles are normal in
size, shape, and position. No mass, mass effect, acute intracranial hemorrhage, or areas of acute infarction seen.
Calvarium intact. Hyperdense material within the right maxillary sinus noted.
MRI L Spine W/O contrast: Impression: 1. 4-mm disc herniation at T11/12. Herniated nucleus pulposus. This
results in significant central canal stenosis. Axial images were not obtained throughout this region on this lumbar
spine study. Recommend repeat MRI of this region with axial images to evaluate for degrees of canal stenosis and
any cord compression. 2. Severe right neural foraminal stenosis at L5/S1. 3. Moderate left-sided neural foraminal
stenosis at L5/S1 and bilaterally at L4/L5. 4. Degenerative changes seen at L1/L2 stable since prior examination.
ASSESSMENT:
1. Generalized weakness (R53.1)
2. Accidental fall (W19.XXXA)
3. Chronic pain syndrome (G89.4)
PLAN:
Patient will undergo MRI of thoracic spine to rule out possibility of spinal cord compression. Further plan based
on the results.
Marjan Caronni, MD
CONSULTATION REPORT:
Service: Orthopedics
Date of Birth: 2/4/19XX
Requesting Physician: Daniel Krackov, MD
Reason for Consultation: Back pain, neck pain, leg pain
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Family History:
Multiple family members with severe rheumatoid arthritis. Father with COPD. No neuromuscular disorders.
Social History:
Lives with fiance; on disability for years.
Home Medications:
Allopurinol
Sotalol
Hydralazine
Zosyn
Lisinopril
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vitals: Afebrile, VSS.
General: Pleasant older gentleman in no acute distress.
Musculoskeletal: 5/5 strength in deltoids, biceps, triceps extensors and flexors bilateral upper extremities. Strength
is 5/5 quadriceps, tibialis and gastrocnemius, extensor hallucis longus bilaterally. Pain is diffusely lateral and pos-
terior thigh of left leg.
Neurological: Straight leg raise negative bilaterally. No focal neurological deficits.
IMAGING:
CT of cervical spine shows moderate amount of stenosis at C4-C5, C5-C6, C6-C7 and also severe neural foram-
inal stenosis at L4-L5. The CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis shows moderate stenosis, lumbar spine at L3-L4,
L4-l5, and T3. Also, vacuum disk phenomenon and loss of normal lumbar lordosis.
Troy Copeland, MD
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Patient: H.B.
The next document is an intake evaluation form for an outpatient who is being assessed for hospice care to address
chronic pain issues.
Patient: H.B.
A/O X 3
PMHX: SHINGLES AND INOPERATIVE KIDNEY STONES, GLAUCOMA, TREMORS. PATIENT
HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET FULL PAIN RELIEF FROM SHINGLES/KIDNEY STONES. PAIN
IS HER PRIMARY COMPLAINT.
CODE STATUS:
FULL CODE
THE PATIENT SHOULD MEET MANY OF THE FOLLOWING NONDISEASE SPECIFIC CRI-
TERIA (MARK ALL THAT APPLY):
RECENT DECLINE IN FUNCTIONAL STATUS
HEALTH HISTORY
CPR PREFERENCE: WAS THE PATIENT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY ASKED ABOUT PREFERENCE
REGARDING THE USE OF CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION (CPR)? (SELECT THE
MOST ACCURATE RESPONSE)
1. YES, AND DISCUSSION OCCURRED
DATE THE PATIENT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY WAS FIRST ASKED ABOUT PREFERENCE RE-
GARDING THE USE OF CPR:
6/5/20XX
DATE THE PATIENT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY WAS FIRST ASKED ABOUT PREFERENCES RE-
GARDING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS OTHER THAN CPR:
6/5/20XX
DATE THE PATIENT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY WAS FIRST ASKED ABOUT PREFERENCE RE-
GARDING HOSPITALIZATION:
6/5/20XX
DID THE HOSPICE OBTAIN A COPY OF ADVANCE DIRECTIVES FOR THE MEDICAL RECORD?
NO
WHY WAS A COPY OF THE PATIENT’S ADVANCE DIRECTIVES NOT OBTAINED FOR THE
CHART?
MSW TO OBTAIN
PAIN
WAS THE PATIENT SCREENED FOR PAIN?
1. YES
ASSESSING LOCATION?
1. YES
ASSESSING SEVERITY?
1. YES
ASSESSING CHARACTER?
1. YES
HOW DOES THE PATIENT DESCRIBE THE CHARACTER OF PAIN? (MARK ALL THAT APPLY)
BURNING
THROBBING
ASSESSING DURATION?
1. YES
ASSESSING FREQUENCY?
1. YES
INDICATE EFFECTS OF THE PAIN ON QUALITY OF LIFE INDICATORS (MARK ALL THAT
APPLY):
ABILITY TO ENJOY ACTIVITIES/HOBBIES
APPETITE
FUNCTIONAL STATUS
SLEEP/REST DISTURBANCE
INTEGUMENTARY
INTEGUMENTARY ASSESSMENT FINDINGS (MARK ALL THAT APPLY):
NO PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
RESPIRATORY
WAS THE PATIENT SCREENED FOR SHORTNESS OF BREATH?
1. YES
GASTROINTESTINAL
WAS A SCHEDULED OPIOID INITIATED OR CONTINUED?
0. NO
EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES
EXISTING EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES CURRENTLY PRESENT IN HOME (MARK ALL THAT APPLY):
CANE (QUAD)
SOCIAL SUPPORT
WAS THE PATIENT/CAREGIVER ASKED ABOUT SPIRITUAL/EXISTENTIAL CONCERNS?
(SELECT THE MOST ACCURATE RESPONSE)
1. YES, AND DISCUSSION OCCURRED
DATE THE PATIENT AND/OR CAREGIVER WAS FIRST ASKED ABOUT SPIRITUAL/EXISTENTIAL
CONCERNS:
6/5/20XX
LABS
ARE LABS TO BE PERFORMED THIS VISIT?
NO
FALLS
HAS THE PATIENT HAD A RECENT FALL?
NO
LIST ALL OTHER PHYSICIANS (FULL NAME/LOCATION) INVOLVED IN THE PATIENT’S CARE:
N/A
FINANCIAL
PAYOR INFORMATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
X. UNKNOWN
INTERVENTIONS PROVIDED
1. INSTRUCT IN AGENCY CONTACTS AND PHONE NUMBERS.
DETAILS/COMMENTS: FOLDER LEFT IN HOME
2. DISCUSSED PROPOSED PLAN OF CARE AND DISCIPLINES WITH PATIENT/CARE-
GIVER(S) AND (IF APPLICABLE) FACILITY STAFF.
DETAILS/COMMENTS: REVIEWED TEAM CONCEPT
Patient: R.C.
The next document is a palliative care consult for an inpatient who has relapsing lymphoma.
Patient: R.C.
Palliative Care Initial Consult
Patient: R.C. Age: 44 years MRN: 82407
Requesting Provider: Dr. Amini
Reason for Consultation: Goals of care in the setting of relapsed, refractory lymphoma
Date of Service: 9/27/20XX
Interpreter: Rebeca, ID # 4452
Social History:
Tobacco: None
ETOH use: None
Drug use: None
From: California
Lives with: Wife
Family: Wife has 2 children from a previous relationship. He has no children. Uncles and aunts and many
family members nearby
Enjoys: Currently is trying to work on recovery
Work: Maintenance
Spiritual/religious background: Catholic, likes to attend Mass when he can
Family History:
No history of cancer
Home Medications:
Acyclovir 400 mg PO bid
Allopurinol 300 mg PO daily
Bactrim DS 1 tab PO q MWF
MiraLax 17 gram PO bid
Review of Systems:
Pain: Denies
Dyspnea: Denies; has dry cough
Nausea: Denies
Appetite: “Just fine.” He has managed to regain some weight over the last month
Bowel/bladder: Was severely constipated but now having BMs
Activity: Ambulatory and independent with ADLs
Sleep: Sleeping well
Mood: Denies anxiety or depression. C/O fatigue
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:
Vital Signs:
T 37.7°C (99.9°F), BP 103/70, heart rate 142, respiratory rate 18, SpO2 98% room air.
General: Alert and oriented, no acute distress.
Respiratory: Respirations are nonlabored. Breath sounds are equal. Symmetrical chest wall expansion.
Cardiovascular: Tachycardia, regular rhythm. No edema.
Gastrointestinal: Soft, nontender, minimal abdominal ascites. Normal bowel sounds.
Musculoskeletal: No tenderness, no swelling, no deformity, moves all 4 extremities spontaneously.
Integumentary: Warm, no lesions, no skin breakdown.
Neurological: Alert, oriented. No focal deficits.
Psychiatric: Cooperative. Appropriate mood and affect.
Labs:
CBC
WBC 3.3
RBC 3.03
HGB 8.7
HCT 26.3
MCHC 35.0
MCV 87
Platelet 57
BMP
Sodium 133
Potassium 4.0
Chloride 100
CO2 16
Glucose 54
BUN 14
Creatinine 0.4
Other
Calcium 7.0
Albumin 3.1
Alk Phos 75
AST 80
ALT 25
Bilirubin 1.4
Cardiac Enzymes
Troponin-1 less than 0.02
Radiology Results:
Chest Single-View Adult Portable
Impression: Small bilateral pleural effusions and mild interstitial pulmonary edema have increased when compared to
previous film. Lingular and left lower lobe consolidation are unchanged, accounting for differences in lung volumes,
which could represent atelectasis or acute air space disease. No other change in the interim since previous study.
Copyright © 2019 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights reserved.
Ultrasound:
US Thoracentesis W/Imag Rt
Findings: Ultrasound guided right thoracentesis requested. Procedure, benefits, and risks were explained to the
patient. Consent obtained. An adequate pocket of fluid was identified in the right hemithorax. Skin was prepped
and draped in usual sterile fashion. 2% lidocaine was used for superficial anesthesia. Under direct ultrasound guid-
ance a 5 French Yueh catheter was introduced and 1,200 mL of serosanguineous fluid was obtained. Technically
successful ultrasound guided right thoracentesis. Patient tolerated procedure well without complication and was
returned to the ward in stable condition.
Problem List:
1. Constipation
2. Fatigue, cancer associated
3. Dry cough; likely secondary to malignant pleural effusions, recurrent
4. Relapsed and refractory stage IVB diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Goals of Care:
This patient has a condition that is life limiting. This case involves complex medical decision-making, including
utilization of medications that require close monitoring for toxicity, and discussions about the burdens of resusci-
tation efforts and life-sustaining measures (code status). Additionally, at least 20 minutes were spent in discussions
about advance care planning and goals of care.
Plan:
6. Goals of care:
Goals of care were discussed today with R.C. with assistance of an interpreter. He states that he hopes to continue
fighting his cancer. He states that he feels like the treatments “are not too bad” and he would want to continue
treatments as long as he feels well. His hope is to try a clinical trial at University Hospital in Tucson. He hopes
to become well enough to resume working. Goals are consistent with disease directed therapy.
Disposition: home.
Case discussed today with: RN, Dr. Amini.
Face-to-face time spent greater than 30 minutes, greater than 50% of time was spent in counseling and
coordination of care. Interdisciplinary team members were present and participated.
Thank you for this interesting consultation. Please call with questions or concerns.
NEZAR BRUNELLI, MD
Patient: S.L.
The next document is a psychiatric consult note on a hospitalized patient who has acute anxiety.
Patient: S.L.
Result Type: Consultation Report
Performed by: AnaMaria Ricardo, APRN
Encounter Info: S.L., MRN 45217, Inpatient Medical
CONSULTATION REPORT:
Service: Psychiatry
Date of Birth: 3/24/19XX
Requesting Physician: Dr. Reddy
Reason for Consultation: Anxiety
Social History:
The patient is divorced. He is on disability. He has 2 grown children, 1 son with whom he is estranged. Lives with
his daughter and son-in-law.
ALLERGIES:
Penicillin and gentamicin
Home Medications:
Suboxone
Diazepam 5 mg tid PRN spasms
Ritalin 20 mg PO bid
Ambien 5 mg PO q HS PRN sleep
ASSESSMENT:
AXIS I: Depression, not otherwise specified; anxiety, not otherwise specified; mood disorder, not otherwise spec-
ified; attention deficit disorder, rule out delusional disorder.
AXIS II: Deferred.
AXIS III: Paraplegic secondary to gunshot wound. Neurogenic bladder, chronic decubitus ulcer with osteomyelitis,
and chronic pain.
AXIS IV: Interpersonal.
AXIS V: 45-55.
PLAN:
This patient presents with mood issues, anxiety, and possible delusional disorder. The patient denies suicidal and
homicidal ideation. I recommended Zyprexa, but the patient is declining psychiatric medication at this time.
Continue current psychiatric medications. Risks, benefits, and side effects discussed. The patient understands risks,
benefits, and side effects of the medications. Supportive therapy provided. Once medically cleared, the patient is
okay from psychiatric standpoint to be discharged. The patient was given follow-up information with outpatient
psychiatry.
Jacob Kaplan, MD
Patient: M.B.
The next set of documents is the prenatal record for patient M.B.
Patient: M.B.
Obstetrical Record
Madison Palmer, MMS, PA-C
Patient Information
Name: M.B.
Address: 1125 1st Avenue
City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55401
Date of Birth: 01/13/19XX Baby’s Father:
Age: 26 Name: J.B.
Marital Status: Married Age: 28
Medical History
Personal Medical History: None
Medication Allergies: NKDA
Surgeries: Tonsillectomy (19XX)
Family History
Mother: Age 60, HTN controlled; hyperlipidemia
Father: Age 61, Healthy
Siblings: Sister: Age 29, Healthy
Paternal Grandfather: Type 2 DM, deceased age 81
Maternal Grandmother: Lung CA, deceased age 71
Pregnancy History
Gravida 2, Para 1-0-0-1, SAB 0, EAB 0, Stillborn 0, Neonatal Death 0, Other Loss 0, Premature 0
Date Weeks Duration of Labor Sex Wt Delivery Mode Neonatal Problems OB Problems
07/20/20XX 40 12 hr M 8 lb 0 oz NSVD None None
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
04/20/20XX Unknown N/A N/A N/A N/A -/- 138 118/70 2 weeks
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
05/05/20XX 7w4d N/A N/A 160 N/A -/- 138 110/60 4 weeks
Pt denies vaginal bleeding or cramping. U/S today shows viable intrauterine pregnancy, 7w4d with EDC of 12/18/20XX,
EDC adjusted to U/S dating. New OB labs WNL. Pt reports morning sickness, no emesis. Recommend patient avoid
known triggers, eat small frequent meals throughout the day, continue good hydration, ginger products. If no improvement
with conservative measures, will discuss medical management next visit. Discussed genetic screening options, patient and
husband decline all testing.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
06/02/20XX 11w4d N/A N/A N/A N/A -/- 141 120/72 4 weeks
Pt doing well. She denies cramping, vaginal bleeding, or other complaints. Nausea completely resolved. Reviewed SAB
precautions with patient, warning signs, when to call or go to ED.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
07/5/20XX 16w2d N/A N/A 165 N/A -/- 143 120/72 4 weeks
Pt presents for ROB visit, doing well. No concerns. Anatomy U/S scheduled for next visit.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
07/31/20XX 20w N/A Cephalic 150 + -/- 148 122/70 4 weeks
Anatomy U/S completed today, all anatomy seen and WNL. Pt reports dysuria and urinary frequency. UA negative in office.
Urine and vaginal cultures collected and sent. Continue good nutrition, hydration, PNV daily. Given ED precautions.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
8/24/20XX 23w3d 24 N/A 145 + -/- 160 100/56 4 weeks
Pt denies vaginal bleeding, loss of fluid, or contractions. Active fetal movement. Cultures negative from last visit. Pt denies
symptoms of UTI. Reviewed healthy diet in pregnancy, encouraged exercise 30 min daily. Preterm labor precautions given.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
9/25/20XX 28w 28 N/A 154 + -/- 167 120/72 2 weeks
28-week labs w/glucose tolerance test completed today. Pt feeling well, but c/o low back pain. Recommend increased rest,
heating pad, pregnancy support belt, Tylenol PRN. Tdap and flu vaccine recommended. Pt agrees to both vaccinations.
Encouraged Tdap for family/caregivers. Growth U/S scheduled in 2 weeks.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
10/09/20XX 30w 31 Cephalic 158 + -/- 170 115/70 2 weeks
Growth U/S reviewed- Fetal growth WNL, cephalic presentation, EFW 1,538 g (3 lb 6 oz), overall growth 54th percentile.
Third trimester labs reviewed and WNL. Pt denies reg cxt/LOF/VB. Active FM. PTL precautions given. Pt voices no other
concerns. Pt given Rx for breast pump.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
10/23/20XX 32w 31 N/A 166 + -/- 175 110/66 2 weeks
Pt denies reg cxt/LOF/VB. She reports occasional Braxton Hicks cxts. Active FM, pt performing fetal kick counts daily.
Discussed symptoms of pre-eclampsia, when to RTC or go to the hospital. Pt encouraged to register with hospital and
schedule hospital tour.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
11/09/20XX 34w3d 33 Cephalic 145 + -/- 176 118/76 2 weeks
Pt presents for routine OB visit. She reports good FM. Pt voices no other concerns. Group B Strep culture next visit.
Reviewed options of labor anesthesia and discussed birth plan with pt. PTL precautions given to pt.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
11/22/20XX 36w2d 36 Cephalic 129 + -/- 177 126/78 1 week
Patient reports fatigue, otherwise feeling well. Denies regular cxt/LOF/VB. She endorses good FM. GBS culture done today.
She declines cervical exam today. Discussed cord blood banking, provided informational pamphlet.
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
11/29/20XX 37w2d 37 Cephalic 138 + -/- 178 118/72 1 week
Pt reports cxt last night, 10 minutes apart ×1 hour, eventually resolved with rest. Today, pt denies reg cxt/LOF/VB. GBS
culture reviewed and negative. Reviewed labor & delivery precautions with pt. Pt would like to be checked for dilation.
Bishop Score: 2 (2 cm/40/-3/post/medium).
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
12/07/20XX 38w3d 38 Cephalic 125 + -/- 178 129/82 1 week
Pt reports increased pelvic pressure and irregular BH cxt. No LOF or VB. Denies cxt/LOF/VB. Active FM. Discussed
postpartum birth control options with pt. Labor warning signs reviewed with pt. Bishop Score: 5 (3 cm/50/-3/post/soft).
Visit Date Weeks Fundal Height Position FHT Fetal Activity Urine P/S Wt BP Return Visit
12/15/XX 39w4d 40 Cephalic 131 + -/- 179 127/87 1 week
Pt presents for ROB visit. Pt is experiencing continued irregular cxt. Good FM. Discussed post-dates surveillance and
induction. Given L&D precautions. If undelivered, will complete Biophysical Profile next visit. Bishop Score: 7 (4 cm/60/-2/
post/soft).
Laboratory Studies
Basic Prenatal Panel Late Pregnancy Panel
Date: 4/20/20XX Date: 9/25/20XX
HGB: 11.8 Glucose Screen: 80
HCT: 36.0 HGB: 11.7
Antibody Screen: Negative HCT: 37.1
MCV: 90 MVC: 97
Platelets: 394 Platelets: 250
RPR/VDRL: Nonreactive Antibody Screen: Negative
Urine Culture: No growth RPR/VDRL: Nonreactive
HBSAg: Negative GBS: Negative
HIV Testing: Negative
Rubella Screen: Immune Optional Lab Studies
Chlamydia: Negative CF Screen
Gonorrhea: Negative Other Carrier Screen
Pap Smear: Negative cytology Varicella Immunity
Drug Screen
Aneuploidy Screening Early Glucose
Date: 05/05/20XX 3-hr GTT F_ 1 hr_ 2 hr_ 3 hr
Declined
Patient: R.B.
The next set of documents is the pediatric records for R.B., the child delivered by M.B. There are records of both
well-child visits as well as visits for acute illnesses.
Patient: R.B.
Newborn Well Check
Name: R.B.
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 3 days
Admitted to NICU: No
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
Head
Weight Length Circumference Temp Pulse Respirations
7 lb 2 oz 19.5 in. 13.5 in. 98.6 152 48
HPI:
3-day-old female presents with parents for newborn well check, first visit since hospital discharge. Birth history
uncomplicated as below. Pt breastfeeding, latching well. No formula needed. Voiding and stooling well. No parental
concerns.
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9. Passed newborn hearing screen. 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
Father: Seasonal allergies MGM: HTN, hyperlipidemia
No smoking or use of illicit drugs in the home
Parental Concerns: None
Oral Health: ˛ Daily Gum Cleaning with Washcloth or Infant Toothbrush (Parent Education Completed)
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Breastfeeding Frequency/Duration: Bilateral, 10 min each side every 2–3 hours
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Rooting Reflex ˛ Startle ˛ Suck & Swallow
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Rear-Facing) ˛ Safe Sleep ˛ Shaken Baby Prevention ˛ Safe Bathing/Water Temperature
˛ Passive Smoke ˛ Safety at Home/ChildProofing ˛ Sun Safety ˛ Pacifier Use ˛ Bottle Propping ˛ Infant
Bonding ˛ Support Systems/Resources ˛ Infant Crying/Appropriate Interventions
Social-Emotional Health: ˛ Family Adjustment/Parent Responds Positively to Child
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle open/flat. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears; TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple
with no mass or deformity.
Abd: Soft, nondistended, no masses or organomegaly, bowel sounds positive ×4, umbilical stump dried/intact,
no drainage
MSK: Normal muscle tone, negative Barlow and Ortolani, spine straight, no hair tuft or sacral dimple
Assessment:
Plan:
Pt already back to birth weight and exam WNL, follow-up at 1 month well check, sooner with questions or concerns
Vaccines UTD
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 1 month
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
1-month-old female presents with parents for well check. Pt breastfeeding, continues to latch well. No formula
needed. Started vitamin D 400 units daily. Reports cord fell off at 1 week old, healing well. Starting tummy time.
Voiding and stooling well. No parental concerns.
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9, passed newborn hearing screen, 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
Oral Health: ˛ Daily Gum Cleaning with Washcloth or Infant Toothbrush (Parent Education Completed)
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Breastfeeding Frequency/Duration: Bilateral, 10 min each side every 2–3 hours
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Responds to Sounds ˛ Responds to Parent’s Voice ˛ Follows with Eyes to
Midline ˛ Awake for 1-Hour Stretches ˛ Beginning Tummy Time
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle open/flat. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple
with no mass or deformity.
Abd: Soft, nondistended, no masses or organomegaly, bowel sounds positive ×4, umbilicus dry/healing, no drainage
MSK: Normal muscle tone, negative Barlow and Ortolani, spine straight
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 2-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 2 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
2-month-old female presents with mother for well check. Pt breastfeeding, going well. No formula needed. Pt
starting to sleep longer stretches at night. Voiding and stooling well. +tummy time—starting to get some head
control. + Smiling. Pt healthy, ready to start vaccines today. No parental concerns.
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9, passed newborn hearing screen, 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
Oral Health: ˛ Daily Gum Cleaning with Washcloth or Infant Toothbrush (Parent Education Completed)
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Breastfeeding Frequency/Duration: Bilateral, 10 min each side every 2.5–3 hours
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Some Head Control ˛ Tummy Time/Lifts Head, Neck with Forearm Support
˛ Social Smile ˛ Coos ˛ Beginning Imitation of Movement and Facial Expressions ˛ Makes Eye Contact
˛ Fixes/Follows with Eyes to Midline ˛ Startles at Loud Noises
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Rear-Facing) ˛ Safe Sleep ˛ Shaken Baby Prevention ˛ Safe Bathing/Water Temperature
˛ Passive Smoke ˛ Safety at Home/Child-Proofing ˛ Sun Safety ˛ Pacifier Use ˛ Bottle Propping ˛ Infant
Bonding ˛ Support Systems/Resources ˛ Infant Crying/Appropriate Interventions ˛ Parent Reads to Child
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle open/flat. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple
with no mass or deformity.
MSK: Normal muscle tone, negative Barlow and Ortolani, spine straight
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 4-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Vaccines given today – Hep B, Rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, PCV 13, and IPV – Vaccine education provided including
possible side effects and VIS given
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 4 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
4-month-old female presents with father for well check. Pt continues to breastfeed exclusively, which is going well.
No formula needed. Voiding and stooling well. Starting to babble, laugh, and roll from front to back. +Tummy
time. Sleeping 5–6-hour stretches at night. Parents have not started introducing solids yet. Pt tolerated first set of
vaccines well with minimal fussiness and no fever. No parental concerns.
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9, passed newborn hearing screen, 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle open/flat. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple
with no mass or deformity.
MSK: Normal muscle tone, negative Barlow and Ortolani, spine straight, pushes up when prone
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 6-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Introduce solids anytime between now and 6 months. Start with infant iron-fortified oatmeal cereal mixed with
breastmilk or formula and a spoonful of pureed fruit. Advance as able to vegetable and fruit purees.
Discussed symptoms of teething – first tooth erupts at around 6 months of age on average
Vaccines given today – Rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, PCV 13, and IPV – Vaccine education provided including possible
side effects and VIS given
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 6 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
6-month-old female presents with parents for well check. Pt continues to breastfeed and parents are also giving
oatmeal cereal with fruit once a day and pureed vegetables once a day. No formula needed. No juice. Pt now rolling
both ways and sitting up with support. Voiding and stooling well. No parental concerns.
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9, passed newborn hearing screen, 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Breastfeeding Frequency/Duration: Bilateral, 5–10 min each side every 3–4 hours
˛ Oatmeal cereal with fruit and vegetable purees
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Using a String of Vowels ˛ Rolls Over ˛ Transfers Small Objects ˛ Vocal
Imitation ˛ Sits with Support ˛ Explores with Hands and Mouth ˛ Peek-a-Boo/Patty Cake
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Rear-Facing) ˛ Safe Sleep ˛ Shaken Baby Prevention ˛ Passive Smoke ˛ Safety at
Home/Child-Proofing ˛ Sun Safety ˛ Refrain from Jump Seat/Walker ˛ Sleep/Wake Cycle ˛ Introduce Cup
˛ Begin Using High Chair ˛ Wary of Strangers ˛ Introduce Board Books ˛ Parent Reads to Child
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle open/flat. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple
with no mass or deformity, one bottom tooth starting to come in.
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 9-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Continue oatmeal cereal/vegetables and advance solids as able. Start offering pureed meat. Introduce sippy cup
with water.
Vaccines given today – Hep B, Rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, PCV 13, and IPV – Vaccine education provided including
possible side effects and VIS given
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 9 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
9-month-old female presents with mother for well check. Pt is no longer breastfeeding since about a month ago,
now on Similac Advance 6–8 oz 3–4×/day. Discontinued vit D supplement. Pt eats oatmeal cereal with fruit for
breakfast and meat/fruit/vegetables for lunch and dinner. Starting to offer table foods. Takes water from sippy
cup. No juice. Crawling, starting to say mama/dada nonspecific, sleeping 8–10-hour stretches at night. Voiding
and stooling well. No parental concerns.
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9, passed newborn hearing screen, 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
Verbal Lead Risk Assessment: Child at Risk: ®Yes ˛No Lives in High-Risk Zip Code: ˛Yes ®No
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛Parent Cleaning Baby’s Gums with Infant Toothbrush
F luoride Varnish by PCP
˛
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Formula – Similac Advance, 6–8 oz 3–4×/day ˛ Oatmeal cereal, meat, fruit, vegetables;
starting table foods ˛ Drinks from Cup
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention/
Soft Texture Finger Foods ˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Rear-Facing) ˛ Safe Sleep ˛ Shaken Baby Prevention ˛
Passive Smoke ˛ Safety at Home/Child-Proofing ˛ Sun Safety ˛ Sleep/Wake Cycle ˛ TV Screen Time ˛
Exploration/Learning ˛ Redirection/Positive Parenting ˛ Language/Read to Child/Introduce Board Books ˛
Follow Child’s Lead in Play ˛ Parent Communicates to Child “What Things Are” (Ball, Cat, etc.)
Social-Emotional Health: ˛ Family Adjustment/Parent Responds Positively to Child
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle open/flat. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple
with no mass or deformity, two bottom teeth and two top teeth.
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 12-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Continue with current feeding regimen, advance soft/small bites table foods as able
Brush teeth with grain of rice-sized amount of fluoride toothpaste in the morning and after all food/formula
before bed. First dental visit should be around 12 months old.
UTD on vaccines, none needed today. Screening hgb/hct and lead ordered.
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 10 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
10-month-old female presents with her mother for a 6-day history of clear/yellow rhinorrhea progressing to a wet
cough. Fever started last night, T max 102.5, treated with Motrin initially and then given a dose of Tylenol 1 hour
ago for a fever of 101.6. Current temp 99.2. Tugging on right ear, no drainage. Decreased appetite but drinking
well. Fussy and waking up once or twice at night. Voiding well. No V/D.
ROS:
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9, passed newborn hearing screen, 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
Physical Exam:
Gen: Well appearing/well hydrated, sleeping initially in mother’s arms. Alert upon awakening, fussy during exam.
HEENT: Anterior fontanelle open/flat. PERRL, no conjunctivitis, no drainage. Normal external ears, left TM
normal, right TM erythematous/bulging. +clear nasal discharge. Normal size tonsils, no erythema or exudate,
neck supple, no lymphadenopathy.
Lungs: Unlabored respirations, symmetrical chest rise, normal RR, CTAB, +occasional wet cough
CV: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmur, cap refill less than 3 sec
Neuro: Alert
Assessment:
URI – J06.9
Plan:
Continue treating fever with Tylenol every 4 hr PRN and Motrin every 6 hr PRN
Supportive care for URI – push fluids, nasal saline/suction, sleep upright to help with drainage, humidifier while
sleeping
Return to clinic if condition persists or worsens over the next few days, to ED if difficulty breathing
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 12 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
12-month-old female presents with father for well check. Pt continues taking Similac Advance, currently 8 oz
3×/day. No cow’s milk yet. Pt doing well with table foods, feeds self and improving pincer grasp. Pt eats a good
variety of fruits, vegetables, meat, and starting to eat some cheese and yogurt. No juice. Just started taking a few
steps. Voiding and stooling well. No parental concerns.
Birth History:
Full term-40w2d, spontaneous vaginal delivery with no vacuum or forceps, birth weight 7 lb 2 oz, Apgars 7 and
9, passed newborn hearing screen, 1st Hep B administered in hospital, vitamin K and erythromycin eye ointment
received. First newborn screen sent, no jaundice, bilirubin WNL. No maternal complications.
Family/Social History:
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛ Daily Brushing (Twice by Parent) First Dental Appointment
® Completed ˛ Scheduled Dental Home: Dr. Sharman
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Formula – Similac Advance, 8 oz 3×/day ˛ Table foods—fruit, vegetables, and meat,
starting cheese/yogurt
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ First Steps ˛ “Mama/Dada” Specific ˛ Uses Single Words ˛ Scribbles ˛
Precise Pincer Grasp ˛ Follows Simple One-Step Requests ˛ Looks for Hidden Objects ˛ Extends Arm/Leg
for Dressing ˛ Points to Objects ˛ Plays: Hides Object/Pushes Ball Back and Forth
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Rear-Facing) ˛ Passive Smoke ˛ Safety at Home/Child-Proofing ˛ Sun Safety
˛ Discipline/Praise ˛ Following Child’s Lead in Play ˛ Ignore Tantrums/Give Attention to Positive Behaviors
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle closed. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent, neck supple
with no mass or deformity. Three bottom teeth and four top teeth.
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 15-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Continue with current feeding regimen, continue to advance table foods as able and offer a variety of healthy foods.
Transition from formula to whole or 2% milk in sippy cup. Discontinue bottle and pacifier.
Vaccines given today – MMR, Varicella, and Hep A – Vaccine education provided including possible side effects
and VIS given
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 15 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
15-month-old female presents with mother for well check. Pt doing well with table foods, eats a variety of fruits,
vegetables, meats, whole grains, cheese, and yogurt. Drinks 16–24 oz of whole milk per day from sippy cup, no
juice. No longer using bottle or pacifier. Sleeps 10–11-hour stretches most nights but occasionally wakes up from
teething pain. Voiding and stooling well. No parental concerns.
Family/Social History:
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛ Daily Brushing (Twice by Parent) ˛ Fluoride Varnish by
PCP First Dental Appointment ˛ Completed ˛ Scheduled Dental Home: Dr. Sharman
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Says 3–6 words ˛ Says No ˛ Wide Range of Emotions ˛ Repeats Words from
Conversation ˛ Uses Utensils ˛ Understands Simple Commands ˛ Climbs Stairs ˛ Walking ˛ Puts Objects
In/Out of Container
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Rear-Facing) ˛ Safety at Home/Child-Proofing ˛ Sun Safety ˛ Helmet Use ˛ Growing
Independence ˛ Defiant Behavior/Offer Child Choices ˛ Gentle Limit Setting/Redirection/Safety
˛ Reading/Parent Asks Child “What’s that?” ˛ Follow Child’s Lead in Play ˛ Offer Opportunity to Scribble/
Explore
HEENT: Normocephalic, anterior fontanelle closed. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage.
Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple
with no mass or deformity. Four bottom teeth and four top teeth with no obvious caries.
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 18-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Continue with current feeding regimen, continue giving whole milk and a wide variety of healthy food choices
Vaccines given today – Hib & PCV13 – Vaccine education provided including possible side effects. VIS given.
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 18 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
18-month-old female presents with mother for well check. Pt continues to do well with table foods, eats a variety
of fruits, vegetables, meats, whole grains, cheese, and yogurt. Drinks 16–24 oz of whole milk per day from cup,
no juice. Voiding and stooling well. Development normal per parents, MCHAT and PEDS WNL. No parental
concerns.
Family/Social History:
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛ Daily Brushing (Twice by Parent) ˛ Dental Visits Every
6 Months Dental Home: Dr. Sharman
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Uses a Cup ˛ Walks ˛ Says 10–20 Words ˛ Says “No” ˛ Name One
Picture/2 Colors ˛ Follows Simple Rules/Bring Me the Book ˛ Knows Animal Sounds
HEENT: Normocephalic. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage. Normal external ears, TMs
normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple with no mass or deformity.
All teeth in place except 2-year molars; no obvious caries.
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 24-month well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Continue with current feeding regimen, continue giving whole milk and offering a wide variety of healthy food
choices
Vaccines given today – DTaP & Hep A – Vaccine education provided including possible side effects. VIS given.
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 24 months
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
24-month-old female presents with father for well check. Pt continues to eat a variety of fruits, vegetables, meats,
whole grains, cheese, and yogurt. Drinks 16–24 oz of whole milk per day from a cup, no juice. Voiding and stooling
well. Shows some interest in potty training but not consistent. Pt is active/playful. Speech development WNL
greater than 50 words. No developmental concerns per parents, MCHAT WNL. No parental concerns.
Family/Social History:
Verbal Lead Risk Assessment: Child at Risk ® Yes ˛No Lives in High-Risk Zip Code ˛ Yes ® No
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛ Daily Brushing (Twice by Parent) ˛ Dental Visits Every
6 Months Dental Home: Dr. Sharman
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Kicks a Ball ˛ Stacks 5–6 Blocks ˛ 50-Word Vocabulary ˛ Walks Upstairs/
Runs Well ˛ Puts Two Words Together ˛ Jumps Up ˛ Follows Two-Step Commands
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Forward Facing) ˛ Safety at Home/Child-Proofing ˛ Sun Safety ˛ Trike/Bike Safety
(Helmet Use) ˛ Establish Daily Routine ˛ Discipline/Redirection/Praise ˛ Provide Opportunities for Success/
Choice ˛ Praise for Effort/Success ˛ Encourage/Support Wide Range of Emotions ˛ Read to Child
HEENT: Normocephalic. PERRL, +red reflex bilaterally, no icterus, no drainage. Normal external ears, TMs
normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple with no mass or deformity.
All teeth in place including 2-year molars; no obvious caries.
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 3-year well check, sooner with questions or concerns
Continue with current feeding regimen, continue with whole or 2% milk and offer a wide variety of healthy food
choices
UTD on vaccines – none needed today; sent to lab for blood lead level
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 5 years
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
5-year-old female presents with mother for well check. Pt will be starting kindergarten and needs to complete
vaccines for school. Pt is almost finished with her second year of preschool and has done very well. Pt eats a variety
of fruits, vegetables, meats, some fish, whole grains, cheese, and yogurt. Drinks 16–24 oz of 2% milk per day, no
juice. Pt is active for about 1 hour per day most days of the week. Voiding and stooling well. No parental concerns.
Family/Social History:
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛ Twice Daily Brushing/Flossing (With Parent Assistance)
˛ Dental Visits Every 6 Months Dental Home: Dr. Sharman
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Nutritionally Balanced Diet/5 Servings Fruits & Veggies ˛ Activity/Family Exercise
(1 hr/day)
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ Uses Imaginary Characters ˛ Matches Colors and Shapes/Prints Some N umbers
and Letters ˛ Counts to 10 ˛ Follows Simple Directions ˛ Listens and Attends ˛ Can Button and Zip Clothing
Independently ˛ Goes to Bathroom Independently ˛ Holds Pencil/Cuts with Scissors ˛ Cooperates More in
Group Setting ˛ Good Articulation/Language Skills ˛ Hops/Skips
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Car Seat Safety (Booster Seat) ˛ Safety at Home ˛ Sun Safety ˛ Sports/Helmet Use ˛ Bullying ˛
Good and Bad Touches ˛ TV Screen Time ˛ Begins to Agree with Rules ˛ Dictates Story to Adults ˛ Listens
to Authority Figure & Follows Instructions ˛ School Readiness ˛ Communication with Teachers
HEENT: Normocephalic. PERRL, no drainage. Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external
nose, septum midline, nares patent. Neck supple with no mass or deformity. Mucous membranes moist. Good
dentition with no obvious caries.
MSK: Normal muscle tone and strength, spine straight, full ROM
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 6-year well check, sooner with questions or concerns
Continue to make healthy food choices and stay active. The goal is 5 servings of fruits and vegetables per day.
Maintain 3 servings of calcium foods per day (milk, cheese, yogurt).
Vaccines given today – DTaP, MMR, Varicella, & IPV – Vaccine education provided including possible side
effects. VIS given.
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 8 years
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
8-year-old female presents with mother for a 2-day history of fever and sore throat. T-max 101.4, treating with
ibuprofen, last dose 8 hours ago. Pt reports sore throat rated 5/10 and painful swallowing. Decreased appetite
but drinking well. Pt has also had some intermittent abd pain described as generalized, dull/achy and nausea. No
V/D. No rash.
ROS:
-vomiting, -diarrhea, -rash, -ear pain/drainage, -eye redness or drainage, -nasal congestion/rhinorrhea, -cough,
-body aches, -dysuria
Family/Social History:
No sick family members. +sick exposure-strep has been going around at school.
Physical Exam:
HEENT: PERRL, no conjunctivitis, no drainage, normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally, no nasal congestion
or rhinorrhea, +moderate pharyngeal and tonsillar erythema, 3+ tonsillar enlargement with exudate, neck
supple, +moderate cervical lymphadenopathy
CV: +Mild tachycardia, no murmur, 2+ peripheral pulses and cap refill less than 3 sec
Abd: Soft, nondistended, nontender, no rebound tenderness, no organomegaly, normoactive bowel sounds
Assessment:
Streptococcal pharyngitis – J02.0
Plan:
Continue treating fever/pain with ibuprofen every 6 hr PRN; can also give Tylenol every 4 hr PRN
Return to clinic if condition persists or worsens over the next few days or if fever persists greater than 48 hours
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 11 years
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
11-year-old female presents with dad for well check. Pt is in 6th grade and doing very well in school. She plans to
play on the school volleyball team and needs clearance for sports participation. Pt eats a variety of fruits, vegetables,
meats, some fish, whole grains, cheese, and yogurt. Drinks 16–24 oz of 2% milk per day, no juice. Pt is active for
at least 2 hours per day most days of the week. Has not started menses yet.
Pt/parent denies any history of syncope, chest pain with exercise, broken bones, asthma/wheezing, or seizures. All
answers on sports physical questionnaire benign.
Family/Social History:
No sudden, unexplained death or heart problems in the family before age 50
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛ Daily Brushing 2× Daily/Flossing ˛ Dental Visits Every
6 Months Dental Home: Dr. Sharman
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Nutritionally Balanced Diet ˛ 5 Servings Fruits & Veggies ˛ Activity/Family Exercise
(1 hr/day)
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ School Attendance ˛ Reading at Grade Level ˛ Discuss Body Changes ˛
Dating ˛ Sexuality/Orientation ˛ Performing Well in School
Anticipatory Guidance Provided: ˛ Emergency/911 ˛ Gun Safety ˛ Drowning Prevention ˛ Choking Prevention
˛ Car/Seat Belt Safety ˛ Safety at Home ˛ Sports/Injury Prevention ˛ Bullying/Violence Prevention ˛ Sun
Safety ˛ Safety Rules with Adults ˛ Sex Education/STI ˛ Monitor TV/Computer Time ˛ Peer Refusal Skills
˛ Self-Control ˛ Depression/Anxiety ˛ Tobacco/Alcohol/Drugs/Rx Drugs/Inhalants ˛ Risks of Tattoos/
Piercing ˛ After-School Activities/Supervision ˛ Education Goals/Activities
Social-Emotional Health: ˛ Comfortable Body Image ˛ Feels Good About Self ˛ Is Child Happy? ˛ Social
Interaction
HEENT: Normocephalic. PERRL. Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally. Normal external nose, septum
midline, nares patent. Neck supple without mass or deformity, no cervical lymphadenopathy. Mucous membranes
moist, good dentition with no obvious caries.
CV: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmur, 2+ peripheral pulses, cap refill less than 3 sec
MSK: Normal muscle tone, 5/5 equal strength bilaterally on upper and lower extremities, spine straight—
no scoliosis, full ROM throughout
Assessment:
Plan:
Excellent weight gain/growth/VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 12-year well check, sooner with questions or
concerns
Continue to make healthy food choices and stay active. Maintain 3 servings of calcium foods per day (milk, cheese,
yogurt).
Vaccines given today – Tdap, Meningococcal, & HPV – Vaccine education provided including possible side effects;
VIS given. Return in 6–12 months for second HPV.
DOB: 12/20/20XX
Age: 16 years
Allergies: NKDA
Vital Signs:
HPI:
16-year-old female presents with mother for well check. Pt is a junior in high school and is doing very well in
school. She plans to attend college after she graduates and wants to study physical therapy. Pt eats a variety of
fruits, vegetables, meats, whole grains, cheese, yogurt, and some fish. Drinks 16 oz of 2% milk per day, no juice but
has a soda once or twice a week. Pt is active for about 1 hour per day most days of the week. Onset of menses at
age 12 – reports periods monthly/regular, cramping mild, no heavy bleeding. No parental concerns.
HEADSSS screen performed with pt only and confidentiality discussed. Pt reports she is happy with her weight
and has a healthy body image. She feels safe at home and gets along well with her parents and siblings most of the
time. Denies abuse. Reports doing well in school and has positive peer relationships, denies bullying. Doing well
in school, has good friends, and enjoys playing on the school volleyball team and also works out at a Crossfit gym.
She denies smoking, alcohol, or drug use. She has had a couple of boyfriends but no very serious relationships and
is currently single. She denies any sexual history and reports she knows how to protect herself against STIs and
pregnancy. She denies symptoms of depression or suicidal ideations.
Family/Social History:
Oral Health: White Spots on Teeth: ®Yes ˛No ˛ Daily Brushing 2× Daily/Flossing ˛ Dental Visits Every
6 Months Dental Home: Dr. Sharman
Nutritional Screening: ˛ Nutritionally Balanced Diet ˛ 5 Servings Fruits & Veggies ˛ Soda/Energy Drinks
˛ Activity/Exercise (1 hr/day)
Developmental Surveillance: ˛ School Attendance ˛ Reading at Grade Level ˛ Dating ˛ Sexuality/Orientation
˛ Risk-Taking
Social-Emotional Health: ˛ Comfortable Body Image ˛ Mental Health Concerns ˛ Dealing with Stress
˛ Depression/Anxiety ˛ Decision-Making
HEENT: Normocephalic. PERRL. Normal external ears, TMs normal bilaterally, normal external nose, septum
midline, nares patent, neck supple with no mass or deformity, no cervical lymphadenopathy, mucous membranes
moist, good dentition with no obvious caries.
Lungs: Unlabored respirations, symmetrical chest rise, normal RR, CTAB
MSK: Normal muscle tone and strength, spine straight, full ROM
Assessment:
Plan:
VS and exam WNL, follow-up at 17-year well check, sooner with questions or concerns
Continue to make healthy food choices and stay active. Maintain 3 servings of calcium foods per day (milk, cheese,
yogurt). Minimize soda intake to occasional treat.
Vaccines given today – Meningococcal – Vaccine education provided including possible side effects; VIS given
A sexual history is important for all patients to provide information that identifies those at risk for sexually transmitted disease,
including HIV, to guide risk-reduction counseling, and to identify what anatomical sites are suitable for STD screening. This basic
sexual history tool can be used by clinicians as a guide to determine the patient’s risk for STDs. This history can be taken by the
clinician as part of the history and physical, or done by the patient as a self-administered questionnaire. This template may not be
culturally appropriate for some patients, and it can be adjusted as needed.
“Now I am going to take a few minutes to ask you some sensitive questions that are important for me to help you be healthy.
Anything we discuss will be completely confidential. I won’t discuss this with anyone, not even your parents, without your permission.”
“Some of my patients your age have started having sex. Have you had sex?” or
“What are you doing to protect yourself from AIDS, HIV, or other STDs?”
If you identify that the teen is sexually active, you will want to continue with a more complete sexual history...
2. Adults. “Now I am going to take a few minutes to ask you some direct questions about your sexual health. These questions
are very personal, but it is important for me to know so I can help you be healthy. I ask these questions to all of my patients
regardless of age or marital status and they are just as important as other questions about your physical and mental health.
Like the rest of this visit, this information is strictly confidential.”
B. The 5 Ps: Partners, sexual Practices, Past STDs, Pregnancy history and plans, and Protection from STDs
1. Partners. For sexual risk, it is important to determine the number and gender of a patient’s sexual partners. One should make
no assumptions of partner gender in the initial history-taking. If multiple partners, explore for more specific risk factors, such as
patterns of condom use and partner’s risk factors (i.e., other partners, injection drug use, history of STDs). If one partner, ask
about length of the relationship and partner’s risk, such as other partners and injection drug use.
If the patient has sex with both men and women, repeat these questions for each specific gender.
2. Sexual Practices. In addition to determining the gender and number of partners, it is also important to ask about sexual
practices and condom use. Asking about sex practices will guide risk-reduction strategies and identify anatomical sites from
which to collect specimens for STD testing.
“I am going to be more explicit about the kind of sex you may have been having over the last year so I understand your risks for STDs.”
• “Do you have vaginal sex, meaning penis in vagina sex?” If answer is yes,
• “Do you use condoms: never, sometimes, most of the time, or always for this kind of sex?”
• “Do you have anal sex, meaning penis in rectum/anus sex?” If answer is yes,
• “Do you use condoms: never, sometimes, most of the time, or always for this kind of sex?”
• “Do you have oral sex, meaning mouth on penis/vagina?” If condom use is inconsistent,
• “In what situations, or with whom, do you not use condoms?”
3. Past history of STDs. A history of prior gonorrhea or chlamydia infections increases a person’s risk for repeat infection.
Recent past STDs indicate higher risk behavior.
(Continued)
4. Pregnancy plans. Based on partner information already obtained, you may determine that the patient is at risk for
becoming pregnant or causing a pregnancy. If so, determine first whether pregnancy is desired.
• “What do you do to protect yourself from sexually transmitted diseases and HIV?”
With this open-ended question, you allow different avenues of discussion: condom use, monogamy, patient self-perception
of risk, and perception of partner’s risk. If you have determined that the patient has had one partner in the past 12 months
and that partner has had no other partners, infrequent or no condom use may not warrant risk-reduction counseling.
Regardless of the patient’s risk behavior, if the patient is a woman and is 25 or younger, routine screening for chlamydia is
recommended annually.
C. Additional questions to identify HIV and hepatitis risk. Immunization history for hepatitis A and B can be noted at this point,
as well as past HIV testing. Hepatitis A immunization is recommended for men who have sex with men (MSM) and intravenous
drug users (IDU).
D. Finishing up. By the end of this section of the interview, the patient may have come up with information or questions
that she/he was not ready to discuss earlier.
• “Is there anything else about your sexual practices that I need to know about to ensure you good health care?”
• “Do you have any questions?”
At this point, review and reinforce positive, protective behaviors. After reinforcing positive behavior, it is appropriate to
address specific concerns regarding higher-risk practices. Your expression of concern can then lead to risk-reduction
counseling or a counseling referral.
(Reprinted with permission from the California STD/HIV Prevention Training Center.)
TNational
he abbreviations, symbols, and dose designations found in
this table have been reported to ISMP through the ISMP
Medication Errors Reporting Program (ISMP MERP) as
nicating medical information. This includes internal communica-
tions, telephone/verbal prescriptions, computer-generated
labels, labels for drug storage bins, medication administration
being frequently misinterpreted and involved in harmful records, as well as pharmacy and prescriber computer order
medication errors. They should NEVER be used when commu- entry screens.
Abbreviations Intended Meaning Misinterpretation Correction
µg Microgram Mistaken as “mg” Use “mcg”
AD, AS, AU Right ear, left ear, each ear Mistaken as OD, OS, OU (right eye, left eye, each eye) Use “right ear,” “left ear,” or “each ear”
OD, OS, OU Right eye, left eye, each eye Mistaken as AD, AS, AU (right ear, left ear, each ear) Use “right eye,” “left eye,” or “each eye”
BT Bedtime Mistaken as “BID” (twice daily) Use “bedtime”
cc Cubic centimeters Mistaken as “u” (units) Use “mL”
D/C Discharge or discontinue Premature discontinuation of medications if D/C (intended to mean Use “discharge” and “discontinue”
“discharge”) has been misinterpreted as “discontinued” when
followed by a list of discharge medications
IJ Injection Mistaken as “IV” or “intrajugular” Use “injection”
IN Intranasal Mistaken as “IM” or “IV” Use “intranasal” or “NAS”
HS Half-strength Mistaken as bedtime Use “half-strength” or “bedtime”
hs At bedtime, hours of sleep Mistaken as half-strength
IU** International unit Mistaken as IV (intravenous) or 10 (ten) Use “units”
o.d. or OD Once daily Mistaken as “right eye” (OD-oculus dexter), leading to oral liquid Use “daily”
medications administered in the eye
OJ Orange juice Mistaken as OD or OS (right or left eye); drugs meant to be diluted Use "orange juice"
in orange juice may be given in the eye
Per os By mouth, orally The “os” can be mistaken as “left eye” (OS-oculus sinister) Use “PO,” “by mouth,” or “orally”
q.d. or QD** Every day Mistaken as q.i.d., especially if the period after the “q” or the tail of Use “daily”
the “q” is misunderstood as an “i”
qhs Nightly at bedtime Mistaken as “qhr” or every hour Use “nightly”
qn Nightly or at bedtime Mistaken as “qh” (every hour) Use “nightly” or “at bedtime”
q.o.d. or QOD** Every other day Mistaken as “q.d.” (daily) or “q.i.d.” (four times daily) if the “o” is Use “every other day”
poorly written
q1d Daily Mistaken as q.i.d. (four times daily) Use “daily”
q6PM, etc. Every evening at 6 PM Mistaken as every 6 hours Use “daily at 6 PM” or “6 PM daily”
SC, SQ, sub q Subcutaneous SC mistaken as SL (sublingual); SQ mistaken as “5 every;” the “q” Use “subcut” or “subcutaneously”
in “sub q” has been mistaken as “every” (e.g., a heparin dose
ordered “sub q 2 hours before surgery” misunderstood as every 2
hours before surgery)
ss Sliding scale (insulin) or ½ Mistaken as “55” Spell out “sliding scale;” use “one-half” or
(apothecary) “½”
SSRI Sliding scale regular insulin Mistaken as selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitor Spell out “sliding scale (insulin)”
SSI Sliding scale insulin Mistaken as Strong Solution of Iodine (Lugol's)
i/d One daily Mistaken as “tid” Use “1 daily”
TIW or tiw 3 times a week Mistaken as “3 times a day” or “twice in a week” Use “3 times weekly”
U or u** Unit Mistaken as the number 0 or 4, causing a 10-fold overdose or Use “unit”
greater (e.g., 4U seen as “40” or 4u seen as “44”); mistaken as
“cc” so dose given in volume instead of units (e.g., 4u seen as 4cc)
UD As directed (“ut dictum”) Mistaken as unit dose (e.g., diltiazem 125 mg IV infusion “UD” misin- Use “as directed”
terpreted as meaning to give the entire infusion as a unit [bolus] dose)
Dose Designations Intended Meaning Misinterpretation Correction
and Other Information
Trailing zero after 1 mg Mistaken as 10 mg if the decimal point is not seen Do not use trailing zeros for doses
decimal point expressed in whole numbers
(e.g., 1.0 mg)**
“Naked” decimal point 0.5 mg Mistaken as 5 mg if the decimal point is not seen Use zero before a decimal point when the
(e.g., .5 mg)** dose is less than a whole unit
Abbreviations such as mg. mg The period is unnecessary and could be mistaken as the number 1 if Use mg, mL, etc. without a terminal
or mL. with a period written poorly period
following the abbreviation mL
377
Fontes LA. Interviewing Clients Across Cultures: A Practitioner’s general clinical populations: a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Clin
Guide. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2008. E
pidemiol. 2004;57(1):30‒39.
Sullivan DD. Obtaining a cultural history. Perspective on Physician American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Assistant Education. 2001;12(3):197-198. Best practice guidelines for immunizations. http://www
US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance to .immunizationforwomen.org. Accessed February 25, 2017.
federal financial assistance recipients regarding Title VI and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The
the prohibition against national origin discrimination affect- obstetric patient record: antepartum and postpartum forms.
ing limited English proficient persons—summary. http:// http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/
www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-providers/laws-regulations- Patient-Records. Accessed February 25, 2017.
guidance/guidance-federal-financial-assistance-title-VI/index American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Tobacco,
.html. Updated July 2013. Accessed September 30, 2017. alcohol, drugs and pregnancy. http://www.acog.org/Patients/
FAQs/Tobacco-Alcohol-Drugs-and-Pregnancy. Accessed
Chapter 3 February 25, 2017.
Ballweg R, Sullivan EM, Brown D, Vetrosky D. Physician American Pregnancy Association. First trimester screen. http://
Assistant: A Guide to Clinical Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: www.americanpregnancy.org/prenatal-testing/first-trimester-
WB Saunders; 2008. screen/. Accessed June 5, 2017.
Bardes CL. Essential Skills in Clinical Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: American Pregnancy Association. Quad screen test. http://www.
FA Davis; 1996. http://americanpregnancy.org/prenatal-testing/quad-screen.
Bickley LS. Bates’ Guide to Physical Examination and History Accessed June 5, 2017.
Taking. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.
Wilkins; 2008. Clinical pathology screening guidelines for the prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. International clas- and early detection of cervical cancer. http://www.asccp.org/
sification of diseases, 10th revision. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ asccp-guidelines. Accessed June 10, 2017.
icd/icd10.htm. Updated October 1, 2015. Accessed March 20, Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, et al. New Ballard score,
2017. expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr.
Coulehan L, Block ML. The Medical Interview: Mastering Skills 1991;119:417‒423. http://www.ballardscore.com. Accessed
for Clinical Practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 2005. May 29, 2017.
Gomella LG, Haist SA. Clinician’s Pocket Reference. 11th ed. San Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancy and
Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill; 2006. vaccination. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/.
Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, Prichard JS, Sey- Accessed June 12, 2017.
mour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical Chames MC, Bailey JM, Greenberg GM, Harrison RV,
examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and Schiller JH. Prenatal Care. Updated 2015. Ann Arbor,
management of medical outpatients. BMJ. 1975;2:486‒489. Michigan: University of Michigan Health System; 2015.
Kettenbach G. Writing SOAP Notes. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA http://www.umich.edu/1info/FHP/practiceguides/newpnc/
Davis; 2003. PNC.pdf.
MacLean C. Patient education: sharing a passion, sharing Farahi N, Zolotor A. Recommendations for preconception coun-
r esources. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(7):721. seling and care. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88:499‒506.
MedlinePlus. Choosing effective patient education materials. Hollister maternal/newborn record system. Chicago, IL:
https://medlineplus.gov/ency/patientinstructions/000455. Hollister, Inc; 2006. http://www.fawdry.info/eepd/03_dat/
htm. Updated October 2015. Accessed April 4, 2017. a_notes/USA.pdf.
Muhrer JC. The importance of the history and physical in diag- Lewis ML. A comprehensive newborn examination: part I.
nosis. Nurse Pract. 2014;39:30‒35. General, head and neck, cardiopulmonary. Am Fam Physician.
Peterson MC, Holbrook JH, Hales DV, Smith NL, Staker LV. 2014;90:289‒296.
Contributions of the history, physical examination, and Lewis ML. A comprehensive newborn examination: part II.
laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. West J Skin, trunk, extremities, neurologic. Am Fam Physician.
Med. 1992;156(2):163‒165. 2014;90:297‒302.
Platt R. Two essays on the practice of medicine. Manchester Mersch J. Apgar score. http://www.medicinenet.com/apgar_
University Medical School Gazette, 1947;27:139-145. score/article.htm. Accessed June 14, 2009.
Roach WH. Medical Records and the Law. 4th ed. Sudbury, MA: Moos MK, Dunlop AL, Jack BW, et al. Healthier women,
Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2006. healthier reproductive outcomes: recommendations for the
Roth-Kauffman M. Physician Assistant Business Practice and Legal routine care of all women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet
Guide. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2005. Gynecol. 2008;12; S280‒S289.
Schwartz MH. Textbook of Physical Diagnosis: History and Exam- Moses S. Delivery note. Family practice notebook. http://www
ination. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. .fpnotebook.com/OB/LD/DlvryNt.htm. Updated October 11,
Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Flynn JA, Solomon BS, Stewart 2008. Accessed April 6, 2009.
RW. Mosby’s Physical Examination Handbook. 7th ed. Sokol RJ, Martier SS, Ager JW. The T-ACE Questions: practi-
Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2010. cal prenatal detection of risk drinking. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
Tsukamoto T, Ohira Y, Noda K, Takada T, Ikusaka M. The 1989;60:863‒870.
contribution of the medical history for the diagnosis of simu- US Department of Health and Human Services. Foodsafety.gov.
lated cases by medical students. Int J Med Educ. 2012;3:78‒82. Checklist of foods to avoid during pregnancy. https://www
Wasson J, Walsh B, Sox H, Pantell R. The Common Symptom .foodsafety.gov/risk/pregnant/chklist_pregnancy.html.
Guide. 6th ed. San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill; 2009. Accessed February 25, 2017.
Chapter 4 Chapter 5
Aertgeerts B, Buntinx F, Kester A. The value of the CAGE American Academy of Pediatrics. Bright Futures: prevention and
in screening for alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence in health promotion for infants, children, adolescents, and their
American Urological Association. Prostate specific antigen: best adults: the evidence report. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/
practice statement: 2013 update. http://www.auanet.org/ docs/guidelines/ob_gdlns.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2017.
guidelines/prostate-specific-antigen-(2009-amended-2013). Preventive Services Recommended by the USPSTF. Agency
Updated August 2013. Accessed March 25, 2017. for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://
Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. The www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guide-
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in lines-recommendations/guide/section1.html. Updated June
Primary Care. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health 2014. Accessed September 30, 2017.
Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_ Rabin RF, Jennings JM, Campbell JC, Bair-Merritt MH.
MSD_MSB_01.6a.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2017. Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review.
California STD/HIV Prevention Training Center. A clinician’s Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):439‒445.
guide to sexual history taking. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/ Skinner HA. The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav.
Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/ 1982;7:363‒371.
CA-STD-Clinician-Guide-Sexual-History-Taking.pdf. Sokol RJ, Martier SS, Ager JW. The T-ACE questions: practi-
Updated May 2011. Accessed March 25, 2017. cal prenatal detection of risk drinking. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
Callahan-Lyon P. Electronic cigarettes: human health effects. 1989;60:863‒870.
Tob Control. 2014;23(suppl 2):ii 36‒40. USPSTF A and B Recommendations. US Preventive Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Body mass index. Task Force. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/index.html. Page/Name/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations. Updated
Updated May 2015. Accessed June 17, 2017. April 2017. Accessed September 30, 2017.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Family healthware. US Department of Health and Human Services. My family
https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/famhistory/famhist_ health portrait: a tool from the surgeon general. https://
healthware.htm. Updated August 2016. Accessed March 27, familyhistory.hhs.gov/fhh-web/home.action. Updated
2017. January 2017. Accessed March 30, 2017.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Oral health US Department of Labor. Occupational Safety and Health
resources. https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/index.html. Administration. http://www.osha.gov/index.html. Accessed
Updated September 2017. Accessed September 30, 2017. March 28, 2017.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Periodontal disease. Winden TJ, Chen ES, Wang Y, Sarkar IN, Carter EW, Melton
https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/periodontal_disease. Updated GB. Towards the standardized documentation of e-cigarette
March 2015. Accessed March 30, 2017. use in the electronic health record for population health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention check- surveillance and research. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc.
list. https://www.cdc.gov/prevention. Updated December 2015;199‒203. Accessed September 30, 2017.
2015. Accessed September 30, 2017.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccines and Chapter 7
immunizations: immunization schedules. https://www.cdc American Geriatrics Society 2015 updated Beers criteria for
.gov/vaccines/schedules/index.html. Updated February 2017. potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am
Accessed March 28, 2017. Geriatr Soc. 2015. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/
Cherpitel CJ. Brief screening instruments for alcoholism. Alcohol jgs.13702/pdf
Health Res World. 1997;21(4):348‒351. American Hospital Association. Put it in writing: questions and
Department of Health and Human Services. About health answers on advance directives. http://www.aha.org/content/
literacy. https://www.hrsa.gov/about/organization/bureaus/ 13/putitinwriting.pdf. Updated December 2012.
ohe/health-literacy/index.html. Updated August 2016. Accessed March 27, 2017.
Accessed March 25, 2017. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring
Etter JF, Bullen C. Electronic cigarette: users profile, uti- balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instru-
lization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction. ment. Physiother Can. 1989;41(6):304‒311.
2011;106(11):2017‒2028. Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The
Fiellin DA, Reid MC, O’Connor PG. Screening for al- mini-cog: a cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia
cohol problems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry.
2000;160:1977‒1989. 2000;15(11):1021‒1027.
Heidelbaugh JJ, Tortorello M. The adult well male examination. Brink TL, Yesavage JA, Lum O, Heersema P, Adey MB, Rose
Am Fam Physician. 2012;85:964‒971. TL. Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clin Gerontol I.
MacMillan HL, Wathen CN, Jamieson E, et al. The McMaster 1982;37‒44.
Violence Against Women Research Group. Approaches to Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, et al. ACC/AHA guideline
screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings. update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncar-
JAMA. 2006;296:530‒536. diac surgery—executive summary. A report of the American
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2013. Centers for College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996
.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/namcs_summary/2013_namcs_web_ Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for
tables.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2017. Noncardiac Surgery). Anesth Analg. 2014;94:1052-1064.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. The modified alcohol, smoking Elsawy B, Higgins KE. The geriatric assessment. Am Fam
and substance-involvement screening test. Adapted from the Physician. 2011;83:48‒56.
World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Ersan T, Schwer WA. Perioperative Management of the
Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) Version 3.0. https:// Geriatric Patient. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/
www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/nmassist.pdf. 285433-overview#a4. Updated November 2015. Accessed
Accessed March 25, 2017. April 4, 2017.
National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identifi- Focus on Older Adults. US Preventive Services Task Force.
cation, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/
Joseph A, Stuhan C. The reimbursement outlook for Rosen P, Kwoh CK. Patient-physician email: an opportu-
virtual visits. https://www.advisory.com/research/medical- nity to transform pediatric health care delivery. Pediatrics.
group-strategy-council/practice-notes/2015/february/ 2007;120(4):701‒706.
virtual-visits. Published February 18, 2015. Accessed Schwimmer J. What are the benefits and advantages of telemedi-
October 6, 2017. cine? https://www.healthline.com/health/telemedicine-
Kinsey MJ. Please hold for the doctor: why you still can’t email benefits-and-advantages#1. Published August 1, 2015.
your physicians with a simple question. http://www.slate.com/ Accessed July 1, 2017.
articles/technology/future_tense/2014/06/telemedicine_ Shafrin J. Physician-patient email communication: a review.
e_visits_doctors_should_start_using_email.html. Accessed http://healthcare-economist.com/2006/08/02/physician-
October 1, 2017. patient-email-communication-a-review. Published August 2,
Larson J. The new world of physician-patient electronic commu- 2006. Accessed October 1, 2017.
nication. AMN Healthcare, Inc. website. https://www Torrey T. Phone and online service codes on your medical bill: if
.amnhealthcare.com/latest-healthcare-news/the-new-world- you find these codes on your bill, you’ll know what they are.
physician%E2%80%93patient-electronic-communication. https://www.verywell.com/cpt-and-hcpcs-codes-for-telephone-
Accessed October 1, 2017. calls-and-emails-2615304. Updated March 19, 2017.
Lee JL, Choudhry N, Wu AW, et al. Patient use of email, Face- Accessed October 7, 2017.
book, and physician websites to communicate with physicians: Versel N. Doctors and social media: benefits and dangers. Med-
a national online survey of retail pharmacy users. J Gen Intern scape website. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/711717.
Med. 2016;31:45‒51. November 9, 2009. Accessed April 2, 2010.
Lowes R. Patient-centered care for better patient adherence. White CB, Moyer CA, Stern DT, Katz SJ. A content analysis
http://www.aafp.org/fpm/980300fm/patient.html. Accessed of e-mail communication between patients and their pro-
October 1, 2017. viders: Patients get the message. J Am Med Inform Assoc.
MAG Mutual Insurance Company. Telephone encounters 2004;11:260‒267. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
and triage. https://www.magmutual.com/learning/article/ PMC436072. Accessed April 3, 2010.
risk-management-guidelines-telephone-encounters. Accessed Wike K. 93% of patients prefer doctors who email. Health IT
October 1, 2017. Outcomes. https://www.healthitoutcomes.com/doc/of-
Malamon W. Integrating patient email into your practice. https:// patients-prefer-doctors-who-email-0001. June 9, 2014.
www.tmlt.org/tmlt/tmlt-resources/newscenter/blog/2010/ Accessed April 14, 2018.
Integrating-patient-email-into-your-practice.html. Accessed Wynn P. Brave new world of social media. http://www.amsa
October 1, 2017. .org/AMSA/Homepage/Publications/TheNewPhysician/
Menachemi N, Prickett CT, Brooks RG. The use of physician- 2010/0110SocialMedia.aspx. Published February 2010.
patient email: a follow-up examination of adoption and Accessed April 8, 2010.
best-practice adherence 2005-2008. J Med Internet Res. Yaraghi N. The doctor won’t text you now: why doctor-patient
2011;13:e23. communication is still stuck in the 20th century. https://www
Moawad H. Controlling your online presence. http://www .usnews.com/opinion/blogs/policy-dose/2015/11/05/
.mdmag.com/physicians-money-digest/contributor/heidi- why-doctors-still-dont-use-text-or-email-with-patients.
moawad-md/2016/12/controlling-your-online-presence. Accessed March 30, 2017.
Accessed March 28, 2017. Zhou YY, Garrido T, Chin HL, Wiesenthal AM, Liang LL.
Moawad H. Physician social media 101. http://www.mdmag Patient access to electronic health records with secure mes-
.com/physicians-money-digest/contributor/heidi-moawad- saging: impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manag Care.
md/2016/11/physician-social-media-101. Accessed March 2007;13:418‒424.
28, 2017.
Neuner J, Fedders M, Caravella M, Bradford L, Schapira M. Chapter 9
Meaningful use and the patient portal: patient enrollment, use Abramson EL, Bates DS, Jenter C, et al. Ambulatory prescribing
and satisfaction with patient portals at a later-adopting center. errors among community-based providers in two states. J Am
Am J Med Qual. 2014;30:105‒113. Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:644‒648.
Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner for British Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.cms
Columbia. http://www.oipc.bc.ca/pdfs/Physician_Privacy_ .gov/MMAUpdate. Accessed February 1, 2010.
Toolkit/UseofEmailbyPhysicians.pdf. Last updated June 25, Davis R. Prescription writing and the PDR. http://www
2009. Accessed March 28, 2010. .sh.lsuhsc.edu/fammed/OutpatientManual/PrescripWriting-
Pho K. Useful Twitter advice for doctors. http://www.kevinmd PDR.htm. Accessed October 1, 2017.
.com/blog/2010/01/twitter-advice-doctors.html. Published Donyai P, O’Grady K, Jacklin A, Barber N, Franklin BD. The
January 7, 2010. Accessed October 1, 2017. effects of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing.
Princeton Insurance. Reducing risk: telephone communication. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;65(2):230‒237.
http://www.princetoninsurance.com/downloads/reducing_ Families USA. Congress delivers help to people with Medicare:
risk/Tips.to.reduce.phone.liability.May05.pdf. Accessed an overview of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and
October 1, 2017. Providers Act of 2008. http://www.familiesusa.org/assets/
Quatre T. Email: the new frontier in physician-patient com- pdfs/medicare-improvements-act-2008.pdf. Accessed January
munication? The Healthcare Entrepreneur Blog. http:// 25, 2010.
vantageclinicalsolutions.com/2008/04/23/email-the-new- Food and Drug Administration. Medication errors. http://www
frontier-in-physician-patient-communication/. Accessed .fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/MedicationErrors/default.htm.
October 1, 2017. Updated April 2017. Accessed October 1, 2017.
Rajecki R. Patients see benefits of email and web Gabriel MH, Swain M. E-Prescribing Trends in the United States.
communications—if free. Published October 29, 2009. ONC data brief, no.18. Washington, DC: Office of the
http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/article/ National Coordinator for Health Information Technology;
articleDetail.jsp?id=636485. Accessed March 29, 2010. July 2014.
Hale PL. Electronic Prescribing for the Medical Practice: Every- US Department of Justice. Drug Enforcement Agency. Elec-
thing You Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Ask. Chicago, IL: tronic prescriptions of controlled substances. https://www
Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society; .deadiversion.usdoj.gov/ecomm/e_rx/faq/faq.htm. Accessed
2007. October 1, 2017.
IMS Health. IMS health reports U.S. prescription sales grew US Department of Justice. Drug Enforcement Agency. Practi-
5.1 percent in 2009, to $300.3 billion. http://www.imshealth. tioner’s manual. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/
com/portal/site/imshealth/menuitem.a46c6d4df3db4b3d88f- manuals/pract. Accessed October 1, 2017.
611019418c22a/?vgnextoid=d690a27e9d5b7210VgnVCM10 US Food and Drug Administration. Title 21 Code of Federal
0000ed152ca2RCRD&cpsextcurrchannel=1. Updated April Regulations. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/
1, 2010. Accessed June 13, 2010. cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm. Accessed December 20, 2009.
Institute of Medicine. Preventing medication errors. Report brief.
http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2006/ Chapter 10
Preventing-Medication-Errors-Quality-Chasm-Series/ American Hospital Association. AHA hospital statistics: fast
medicationerrorsnew.ashx. Published July 2006. Accessed facts on US hospitals. http://www.aha.org/research/rc/
December 17, 2010. stat-studies/fast-facts.shtml. Updated January 2017. Accessed
Isaac T, Weissman JS, Davis RB, et al. Overrides of med- October 1, 2017.
ication alerts in ambulatory care. Arch Intern Med. Bobb A, Gleason K, Husch M, Geinglass J, Yarnold PR, Noskin
2009;169(3):305-311. GA. The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential
Johnston D, Pan E, Walker J, Bates DW, Middleton B. Patient impact of computerized prescriber order entry. Arch Intern
Safety in the Physician’s Office: Assessing the Value of Ambulatory Med. 2004;164:785‒791.
CPOE. The Center for Information Technology Leadership; California Health Care Foundation. Computerized physician
Boston, MA; 2004. order entry (CPOE) is succeeding in community hospitals.
Kaushal R, Kern LM, Barron Y, Quaresimo J, Abramson http://www.chcf.org/media/press-releases/2003/computerized-
EL. Electronic prescribing improves medication safety physician-order-entry-cpoe-is-succeeding-in-community-
in community-based office practices. J Gen Intern Med. hospitals. Accessed October 1, 2017.
2010;25:530‒536. Cartmill RS, Walker JM, Blosky MA, et al. Impact of electronic
Medicare.gov. Prescription drug coverage: basic information. order management on the timeliness of antibiotic administration
http://www.medicare.gov/pdp-basic-information.asp. in critical care patients. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(11):782‒791.
Accessed January 12, 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006 national
National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting hospital discharge survey. National health statistics reports;
and Prevention. Council recommendations to enhance accu- No. 5. Published July 2008. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/
racy of prescription writing. http://www.nccmerp.org/council/ nhsr/nhsr005.pdf. Accessed September 4, 2009.
council1996-09-04.html. Accessed February 8, 2010. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Title 42-Public
National ePrescribing Patient Safety Initiative. The time for ePre- Health; Chapter 4, Section 482.24. https://www.cms.gov/
scribing is now. Allscripts website. http://www.allscripts.com/ Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/
brochures/EP1_NEPSI_CSv1_10508.pdf. Accessed January som107ap_a_hospitals.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2017.
30, 2010. Charles K, Cannon M, Hall R, Coustasse A. Can utilizing a
National Health Statistics Reports, Number 3. National ambula- computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system prevent
tory medical care survey 2006 summary. Centers for Disease hospital medical errors and adverse drug events? Perspect
Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ Health Inf Manag. 2014;11(Fall).
data/nhsr/nhsr003.pdf. Published August 6, 2008. Accessed Classen DC, Avery AJ, Bates DW. Evaluation and certification of
September 10, 2009. computerized provider order entry systems. J Am Inform Assoc.
National Institute of Health Policy. The Medicare Moderniza 2007;14(1):48‒55.
tion Act of 2003. http://www.nihp.org/Reports/ Cornish PL, Knowles SR, Marchesano R, et al. Unintended
NIHPMMA2003Whitepaper.pdf. Accessed January 20, medication discrepancies at the time of hospital admission.
2010. Arch Intern Med. 2005;65(4):424‒429.
National Progress Report on E-prescribing; Surescripts website. Devine EB, Williams EC, Martin DP, et al. Prescriber and staff
http://www.surescripts.com/downloads/NPR/national- perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary
progress-report.pdf. Published December 2007. Accessed care: a qualitative assessment. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak.
November 30, 2009. 2010;10(72):72‒83.
OmniMD. Eprescribing. http://www.omnimd.com/html/ Dixon BE, Zafar A. Inpatient Computerized Provider Order
prescription.html. Accessed November 14, 2009. Entry: Findings from the AHRQ Health IT Portfolio (Pre-
OpenClinical. E-prescribing. http://www.openclinical.org/ pared by the AHRQ National Resource Center for Health
e-prescribing.html. Last updated August 31, 2005. Accessed IT). AHRQ publication 09-0031-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency
October 13, 2009. for Healthcare Research and Quality. Published January 2009.
PharmacyTimes. The state of controlled substance e-prescribing. Accessed October 1, 2017.
http://www.pharmacytimes.com/news/the-state-of- Greenwald JL, Halasyamani L, Greene J, et al. Making inpatient
e-prescribing-of-controlled-substances. Accessed October 1, medication reconciliation patient centered, clinically relevant
2017. and implementable: a consensus statement on key principles
Statista. Total number of medical prescriptions dispensed in the and necessary first steps. J Hosp Med. 2010;5:477‒485.
US from 2009 to 2016 (in millions). https://www.statista. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. List of error-prone
com/statistics/238702/us-total-medical-prescriptions-issued. abbreviations, symbols, and dose designations. http://www
Accessed October 1, 2017. .ismp.org/tools/errorproneabbreviations.pdf. Accessed
US Department of Justice. Drug Enforcement Agency. Con- October 1, 2017.
trolled substances schedules. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized
.gov/21cfr/21usc/812.htm. Accessed October 1, 2017. physician order entry and clinical decision support systems
Stranges E, Wier L, Merrill CT, Steiner C. Hospitalizations in US Pharmacopeia. Quality review: patient-controlled analgesia
which patients leave the hospital against medical advice, 2007. pumps. http://www.usp.org/pdf/EN/patientSafety/
Hospital Cost and Utilization Project Statistical Brief #78. qr812004-09-01.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2009.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www Weiss BD. Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients
.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb78.jsp. Published 2009. Understand. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical
Accessed October 1, 2017. Association; 2007.
The Virtual Anesthesia Textbook. Post-operative Pain. http://www
.virtual-anaesthesia-textbook.com/vat/pain.html. Updated
April 20, 2009. Accessed May 30, 2009.
Cardiovascular system Comprehensive history and physical Denver Developmental Screening Test II
examination, 30 examination (DDST-II), 99
genetic tendency for disease, 135 assessments, 32 Department of Health and Human
review of, 28, 107 components of, 24 Services (HHS), 3, 5, 219
risk assessment for disease, 138 diagnostic studies, 32 Depression, 160, 161
Catheter care, 233 differential diagnosis, 32 Developmental screening, 98–99
CDC. See Centers for Disease Control and history. See History Diabetes mellitus
Prevention (CDC) laboratory studies, 32 genetic tendency, 135
CDSS (Clinical Decision Support physical examination, 29–31 screening, 137, 138
System), 205–206, 235 plan of care, 32 Type 2, 97–98
CDT (clock-drawing test), 162 problem list, 32 Diagnosis
Centers for Disease Control and sample, 32–35 admission orders, 227
Prevention (CDC) uses of, 23 perioperative orders, 230
body mass index, 94 Computer-based patient record, 8 Diagnostic studies
growth standards, 94 Computerized Physician Order Entry admission history and physical
medical records content for hospitalized (CPOE), 235–237 examination, 220
patients, 217 Condition admission orders, 229
older adult vaccinations, 162 admission orders, 227 comprehensive history and physical
oral health, 134 perioperative orders, 230 examination, 32
vaccinations, 100 Confidentiality, social media, 188 postoperative, 233–234
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Consent, to disclose health information, pre-operative evaluation of older
Services (CMS) 11, 273 adults, 163
admission history and physical Consultation letter, 182, 184 surgical history and physical
examination, 218 Consultations, 54–55, 182 examination, 223
comprehensive history and physical Consulting provider, 182 Diagnostic tests
examination, 24 Consult note, 266–270 definitive diagnosis, 52–53
documentation guidelines, 3 Container information section, of prenatal care documentation, 82
electronic prescribing, 204 prescription, 201 screening, 126
EMR note review, 260 Contraceptive counseling and methods, 137 SOAP note documentation of results of,
prescription writing, 197 Controlled substances 50, 54
telemedicine, 186 closed distribution system, 196, 206 Diet
Cerebellum, 30 Controlled Substances Act (CSA), 196 discharge order, 286
Cervical cancer screening, 137 description of, 199 postoperative, 230, 232
Cervix score, 81–82 e-prescribing, 206 risk factor identification, 126, 128
Chief complaint, 24–25, 218, 221 prescription writing for, 201, 205 Diet order, 228, 230, 232
Child abuse, 102, 105 Coronary heart disease, 135 Differential diagnosis
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Counseling, health, 139 admission history and physical
Act (CAPTA), 102 Covered entities, 11 examination, 220
Childhood Maltreatment Interview CPOE (Computerized Physician Order comprehensive history and physical
Schedule—Short Form (CMIS-SF), Entry), 235–237 examination, 32
105–106 Cranial nerves, 30, 108 SOAP notes, 52, 53
Childhood obesity, 97 Cultural history, 27 surgical history and physical
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, 105 Current Procedural Terminology codes examination, 223
Chronic condition, 7 description of, 5 Discharge orders, 285–288
Cigarette smoking, 129–130 evaluation and management services, 5–6 Discharge summary
Civil Rights Act of 1964, 219 fraud, 7 admitting and discharge diagnosis, 288
Clear liquid diet, 232 minutes used for medical discussion, 184 attending physician, primary provider,
Clinical Decision Support System and consulting physician, 289
(CDSS), 205–206, 235 condition at discharge, 291
Clock-drawing test (CDT), 162 D dates of admission and discharge, 288
CMS. See Centers for Medicare and Daily catheter care, 233 description of, 288, 289
Medicaid Services (CMS) Daily orders, 260, 264–266 disposition, 291
Coagulation studies, 179 Daily progress note follow-up instructions, 291
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), content of, 257–260 history, 289–290
medical records content for description of, 257 hospital course in, 290
hospitalized patients (42 CFR medical admissions, 257–259 instructions, 291
482.24), 217 surgical admissions, 260, 261–263 laboratory values, 289–290
Codes. See Current Procedural Daily wound care, 233 medications, 291
Terminology codes DDST-II (Denver Developmental physical examination findings, 289–290
Cognitive assessment, 162 Screening Test II), 99 procedures, 289
Colon cancer screening, 137 DEA. See Drug Enforcement Agency sample, 292–293
Colorectal cancer, genetic, 135 (DEA) Disclosure, of health information, 11
Communication with patient, 183–187. Deferral of examination, 139 Disease prevention
See also Outpatient charting and Definitive diagnosis, 52–53 CDC. See Centers for Disease Control
communication Delivery note, 83–86 and Prevention (CDC)
Comorbid conditions, 220 Demographic information, 80, 179 prenatal care documentation, 83
preventive care, 125 description of, 8–9 General assessments, 48, 220
purpose of, 55 error rates, 195–196 Generic substitution section, of
Disposition, in discharge order, 286 errors associated with, 206 prescription, 201
Documentation federal initiatives for, 204 Genetic diseases, 99, 135
alterations, 3 growth of, 206 Genitalia, examination of, 30
analyzing, 47–48 lack of standards for, 206 Genitourinary system, review of, 28
correcting, 3 qualified, 204–205 Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), 160, 161
evolution of, 1–2 safety benefits of, 204, 205 Geriatric Health Questionnaire, 153,
general principles, 3–5 Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled 154–155
importance of, 1 Substances rule, 206 Geriatric risk factors. See also Older adult
legal considerations for, 2–3 E-mail, 185–187 preventive care visits
medical considerations for, 2 benefits of, 185 assessment of, 153–162
medical records, ICD guidelines, 173 concerns of, 185–186 cognition, 162
outpatient charting and communication, provisions for using, 186–187 depression, 160
183–187 Emotional abuse, 102, 105 functional impairment, 156
patient counseling, 28 EMR. See Electronic medical records gait, 162
patient education, 55 (EMR) mobility, 162
perinatal and postpartum care, 83–88 Endocrine system, review of, 29 nutrition, 156–159
prenatal care, 80–83 Environmental allergies, 25 sensory deficits, 159–160
preventive care visits, 126–139 EPR (electronic patient record), 8 Geriatric syndrome, 160
proven diagnosis, 53 EPSDT (Early and Periodic Screening, Glossopharyngeal nerve, 30
purposes of, 3 Diagnosis, and Treatment) program, 93 Growth charts, 94, 96–97
Dose designations, Appendix C Evaluation and management services, Growth screening, 94, 97–98
Downcoding, 7 5–6, 218 Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive
Drug Abuse Screening Test, 131, 133 Exercise, 126 Services (GAPS), 102
Drug allergies, 25 Eye examination, 29 Gynecological examination, 30
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Eyes, review of, 28
controlled substances, 196, 199, 206
e-prescribing, 196 F H
prescription drug abuse, 197, 199 HDDA (Hearing-Dependent Daily
Facial nerve, 30 Activities) Scale, 159–160
Drug names
Falls, 160 Head circumference, 94
abbreviations, 199
Family Healthware, 135 Head examination, 29
look-alike and sound-alike, 195
Family history Healthcare Information and Management
in admission history and physical Systems Society (HIMSS), 9
E examination, 219 Health-care power of attorney, 165
Ear examination, 30 description of, 26 Health education and counseling, 139
Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, risk-factor identification based on, 135 Health Information Technology for
and Treatment program (EPSDT), 93 in surgical history and physical Economic and Clinical Health Act
Ears, nose, and mouth/throat, review of, 28 examination, 221 (HITECH), 9–10
Eating disorders, 106 Federation of State Medical Boards Health Insurance Portability and
E-cigarettes, 102 (FSMB), 186–187 Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Education, Internet sources for, 187 Female genitourinary system, review of, 108 authorization, 11
EHR (electronic health record), 8 Fever, postoperative, 260 background, 10
Electronic health record (EHR), 8 FIST screening, 102, 104 consent, 11
Electronic medical records (EMR) Five Ws, 260, 264 covered entities, 11
barriers to, 9, 206 Flow sheets, 179, 180 description of, 10
benefits of, 8–9 Follow-up care, in discharge order, 287 electronic health-care transitions, 10
definition of, 8 Follow-up instructions, 56, 58 electronic PHI communications, 186
diagnostic test findings included in, 179 Food allergies, 25, 176 electronic protected health information
e-mailing of, 186–187 Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provisions, 186
health-care delivery functions of, 8 confusion concerning drug Health Insurance Portability provision
interoperability of, 9 names, 195 of, 10
meaningful use of, 9–10 Food diary, 128 individual rights, 11–12
system qualifications, 204–205 Fraud, 7 minors, 12
Electronic nicotine delivery systems Full liquid diet, 232 Notice of Privacy Practices, 12–13
(ENDS), 102 Full operative report, 271 patient rights, 11–12
Electronic patient record (EPR), 8 Functional impairment, 156 penalties for violating, 13
Electronic prescribing privacy policy elements, 13
adverse drug event reductions using, 203 G Privacy Rule, 10–13
barriers to, 206 Gait, 162 privacy violations and penalties, 13
benefits of, 205–206 Galant’s reflex, 108 protected health information,
certification issues, 206 GAPS (Guidelines for Adolescent 11, 13, 186
components of, 204 Preventive Services), 102 security safeguards, 13–14
cost considerations, 206 Gastrointestinal system, review of, 28, 107 summary of, 14
definition of, 203 Gender-specific screening, 136–139 violation of, 13
indications for, 126 differential diagnoses, 52, 53 Trunk incurvation reflex, 108
IPV screening and counseling, 137 follow-up instructions, 56, 58 Tuberculosis screening, 137
laboratory tests, 126 interventions done during the visit, Type 2 diabetes, 97–98
lead exposure, 99 50–51
for men, 138–139 laboratory tests, 54
mental health screening, 160, 161 Objective information portion of,
U
National Institute of Drug Abuse 48–51, 257 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Modified Alcohol, Smoking, and patient education, 55–56 (USPSTF)
Substance Involvement Screening Plan portion of, 54–58 hearing impairment screening, 159
Test (NIDA ASSIST), 131 procedure note, 272–273 medical conditions, 162
older adult medical conditions, 162 Subjective information portion of, risk factor identification based on
osteoporosis, 137 45–48, 257 screening tests, 135–136
pediatric BMI, 94, 97–98 therapeutic modalities, 55
pediatric laboratory tests, 99 Social history V
prostate-specific antigen (PSA), 138 in admission history, 219, 221, 223 Vaccinations See also immunizations
recommended types of, 136–139 in adolescents, 102 older adults, 162
Recommended Uniform Screening in adults, 26–27 refusal of, 100
Panel (RUSP), 99 Social media, 187–188 Vagus nerve, 30
risk factor identification based on, Social Security number, 179 Vegetarians, 128
135–136 Soft diet, 232 Vision testing, 160, 161
screening mammography, 126 Special instruction orders, 229, 234 Vital signs
sensory deficit screening, 159–160 Spinal accessory nerve, 30 in admission history and physical
sexually transmitted infections, 137, 138 Sports preparticipation physical examination, 220
tuberculosis, 137 examination, 106 admission orders, 227–228
USPSTF screening recommendations, 162 Startle reflex, 108 monitoring, 258
for women, 136–138 STI. See Sexually transmitted infection (STI) objective information, 48
Youth at Risk Screening Questionnaire, Stroke, 135 physical examination, 29
105 Subscription section, of prescription, 200 postoperative orders, 230
Secondary codes, 7 Substance abuse, 131–132, 133
Secondary prevention, 125 Sudden death, 106
Security, 13–14 Surgery W
Sensitive protected health information, 11 admissions, 260, 261–263 Wandering, 293–294
Sensory deficits in older adults, 159–160 history and physical examination, Warnings section, of prescription, 201
Sensory examinations, 161–162 221–223 Weber test, 161–162
Sensory testing, 31 pre-operative evaluation of older adults, Websites for medical education, 187
Sexual abuse, 102, 105 162–164 Well-child visits
Sexual history, 132–133 Systems heading format, for documenting components of, 94, 97–106
Sexually transmitted infection (STI) objective information, 50 description of, 93
adult preventive care, 133 Well-man examination, 138–139
email confidentiality, 186 Well-woman examination, 136–137
genitourinary review of systems, 28 T WHO. See World Health Organization
prenatal care documentation, 81 T-ACE questionnaire, 131 (WHO)
prenatal test result documentation, 82 Telemedicine, 186 Women
risk assessment, screening, and Telemetry, 221 screening for, 136–138
counseling, 137, 138 Telephone communications, 183–185 sports preparticipation physical
Signa section, of prescription, 200 Tertiary prevention, 125 examination for, 106
Signature section, of prescription, 201 Testes, 107 World Health Organization (WHO)
Skin, review of, 107 Therapeutic modalities, 55 growth standards, 94
Skin examination, 29 Throat examination, 30 health promotion, defined, 55
Sleep hygiene guide, 56 Timed Up and Go test, 162 International Classification of Diseases
Smoking, 129–130 Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility (ICD), 6
SOAP notes Assessment tool, 162
Assessment portion of, 52–54, 257 Tobacco use, 129–130
description of, 45, 257 Trigeminal nerve, 30 Y
diagnostic test results, 50, 54 Trochlear nerve, 30 Youth at Risk Screening Questionnaire, 105