Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Colin Clarke
Bokgyo Jeong (Jonathan)
Summary of this Week
The focus of this week are as follows:
What kinds of alternative approaches we can take
as counter-arguments of existing main stream
development models (economic growth or
dependency models) ?
Does the social development approach combined
with human resource development provide a
substantially different and meaningful answer to
the previous question?
Summary of this Week (Cont.)
As alternative approaches, we can
turn to the social development going beyond the narrow focus
of economic growth and political democratization
(Martinussen, 1997; Isbister, 1993; Staudt, 1991);
take a look at different dimensions of poverty like basic needs
(Martinussen, 1997; Leys, 1996; Goulet and Wilber) or gender
(Martinussen, 1997; Staudt, 1991; Edward and Hulme, 1997);
reframe development from the practical management
perspective (Edward and Hulme, 1997; Staudt, 1991);
uncover the significant role of the civil society and NGOs
(Edward and Hulme, 1992; Bendix, ; Staudt, 1991);
analyze various environmental factors in order to comprehend
and make sense of the development contexts of developing
countries ( Edward Hulme, 1997; Staudt, 1991)
Take-away Points by each author
Benthamism
Listism
Keynesianism
Rathenauism
Saint-Simonism
Marxist
Mercantilism Economism
Cameralism Leninism
Interventionist
Source: Armstrong (1973:71)
Armstrong (1973), Continued.
– Advancements
• UNEP and UNCTAD
• IFDA
Synthesis
Alternative approach to development
Social development
Civil society and NGOs
Poverty alleviation
Gender and development
Basic needs
Development management
Societal development and environmental analysis
Martinussen
Ch 21: Poverty and Social Development
• Since 1960 poverty and inequality more important
– Relationship to growth and savings
• Shifts in Perception and Strategy
– Passive to active, macro to micro