Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Name
Course code+name
Instructor’s name
University name
City, State
Date of submission
Welfare And Poverty 2
Introduction
The welfare state in the contemporary societies has become a core concern among the
social historians. These social historians are so much into the studies of social, economic and
the ideological manifestations in the entire process of shaping the gender ideals and the
poverty levels. Many scholars have come up and brought the clear concept of the welfare
state as being the already set policies that entail insurance programs that are there to protect
the citizens against the several hardships they face. The two main perspectives that have
been used to analyse the particular role of the welfare state in the contemporary societies are
strategic in bringing ‘classical liberalism’ (Cunningham, Chapter 4.p 45). The primary
principle that was operated by the classical liberalism was on the minimal state. According to
this state, the manufacturers and the individuals were abandoned to partake their self-interests
without any disturbance from the federal governments (Gao, 2018, p.34). Also, it was not
considered as the state's responsibility in the promoting the social welfare and the economic
state. The different social challenges such poverty, unemployment, health problems and even
sanitation were all considered to be individual and behavioural causes (Cunningham, Chapter
4.p 45).
The initial concept of the social democracy is traced back to the nineteenth century. It
was at this particular time towards the last quarter of the century when there was a group that
was emerging based on political philosophy, the organisations and the political activism
(Huber, 2011, p277). These groups came and challenged the blames directed to the
individuals for their misfortunes. They drew attention to the evidence indicating the entire
structure and the economic inputs that were causing the social problems.
Welfare And Poverty 3
The poverty surveys were conducted and pioneered by Charles Booth who carried it
in London, and in New York, the survey was done by Seebohm Rowntree. Also, through
another survey by Tawney published in 1931, it provided eloquent and a more compelling
case for social democracy adoption (Cunningham, Chapter 4.p 46). Through the surveys, it
depicted poverty as being an extensive and entirely beyond the control of any individual. As a
consequence, their conclusions led to different assaults, basing on the idea they were
underpinning the classical liberalism. Through the policies brought on board by the surveys,
they also indicated the entire growth of the acceptance where poverty was the core reason for
the complex social and the economic factors, hence were beyond the control of an individual
One of the prominent strategies of the social democracy was realised during the
creation of the Labour Part initiated in 1906 (Cunningham, Chapter 4.p 46). Through the
strategy, it, first of all, began through the attempt made in securing the election of different
representatives belonging to the working class into parliament. The primary reason for the
fight of this representation was to begin the process of capitalist reforms. Through the
reforms, the governments have been able to realize the different attitudes emanating from the
blames given to individuals according to their poverty levels (Rödel, 2010 p.101). Therefore,
the governments have been radically approaching the issue and seeking for specific
interventions in the economic and welfare sectors so to create harmony and equality in the
contemporary societies.
Like liberalism, the social democracy has been seen to be part of the tradition of a
state which is limited, basing on the political rights and the even the social and civil liberties.
As a consequence, through the social democracy it has stated that for a particular state to
prosper and to be considered a model of progress, its governments need to be accountable and
extreme, on the other hand, it is not advocating for absolute equality (Hendrick, 2013, p134).
As a result, social democracy is not going so much beyond the ideals of liberalism. Besides,
the social democracy does not portray some of the constructive influences brought about by
the democratic socialism, especially when they stress that capitalism needs to be understood
on its own as a system. As a result, it is through this virtue where many people differentiate
social democracy and liberalism and making it a crucial ally of liberalism altogether.
the liberalism of the New Deal era together with Progressive periods. The social democrats of
Europe developed a welfare state along with a Keynesian strategy made through the
economic stabilisation just in parallel with the liberals from America (Marsland, 2016, p201).
Part of it was socialist, and part was liberal. There was also criticism of the neo-liberalism in
around 1970 where it emanated from the post-war of social democratic welfare state (Neo-
Liberalism and the Development of Social Policy and the Social Work After 1979, Chapter 5
spreading the social benefits, in addition to curbing capitalism, has enabled the construction
Neo-liberalism has been associated with the social and economic policies undertaken
by the Conservative governments which existed in the years between 1979 and 1997 (The
Neo-Liberalism and the development of social policy and social work after 1979, Chapter 5
p.65). However, it is before 1979 that the different attempts to bring up and promote the neo-
liberal values were established (Ober, 2012, p.177). It is according to the realisation of the
criticism faced by the social democracy and its ideological attack after the welfare state was
established is when there was a rise in the neo-liberalism. The social workers then became a
major target in the neo-liberal critics of the welfare state in the years 1970 and 1980 (Neo-
Liberalism and the Development of Social Policy and the Social Work After 1979, Chapter 5
Welfare And Poverty 5
p.63). The neo-liberals were against the limited forms of the welfare despite having promoted
the private welfare; they argued that it needs to be given restrictions to provide some form of
limited security (Coughlin, & Moon, 2009, p75). Therefore, for an ideal type of a neo-liberal
welfare system in the contemporary societies, the following three features promote the
welfare.
First, the public welfare system should be entirely based on the needs of the people
rather than their rights (Neo-Liberalism and the Development of Social Policy and the Social
Work After 1979, Chapter 5 p.65). The neo-liberals argued that the benefits received from
rights should be replaced with the tested welfare which is based mainly on the criteria of
strict eligibility (Gray, & Agllias, 2009, p273). Secondly, the public welfare system should
give assistance which is temporal and also conditional. The neo-liberals maintained that the
unconditional welfare has a tendency of being corrupt and hence should be avoided at all
costs. The receipt received from the public support which includes housing, maintenance of
income and health care should be as a result of good character and also follow the
performance of duties and obligations. Lastly, the welfare needs to be delivered voluntarily or
through private organisations instead of state agencies (Neo-Liberalism and the Development
of Social Policy and the Social Work After 1979, Chapter 5 p.66).
Conclusion
In a nutshell, social democracy and the neo-liberalism have been used to analyse how
the welfare state of the contemporary societies has been operating. Through the social
democracy, the means of eradicating poverty amongst the members of a particular state
through accepting private ownership. On the other hand, the neo-liberalism has been used to
bring the public welfare system through; basing the welfare on needs and not rights,
References
Coughlin, R. M., & Moon, J. D. (2009). Responsibility, Rights, and Welfare: The Theory of
Cunningham, S. Social democracy and the development of social policy and social work
Gao, Q. (2018). Welfare, Work, and Poverty. Oxford Scholarship Online, 23-44.
Gray, M., & Agllias, K. (2009). Contemporary Issues and Debates on the Social Welfare
Hendrick, H. (2013). Optimism and liberalism: children of the welfare state, 1945–79. Child
Huber, E. (2011). The Social Democratic Welfare State. Social Democracy in Neoliberal
Times, 276-311.
Marsland, D. (2016). After the Welfare State: Real Welfare in a Free Society. Welfare or
Neo-Liberalism and the development of social policy and the social work after 1979.
Chapter 5 pp 61-67
Rödel, U. (2010). Civil Society and the Welfare State. Towards More Democracy in Social
Services, 98-109.