Twelve Presumptions of the Court

http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2014/12/10/twelve-
presumptions-of-the-court/#more-9552

WHEN YOU WALK INTO A COURTROOM JUDGE’S JURISDICTION,

AT LEAST TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS ARE ALREADY IN FORCE –
WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT!
Cannon Law researcher Frank O’Collins (one-heaven.org) ferreted
out these presumptions and helped make them available to the
general population. We cannot forget that our so-called ‘courts’ are
run by a private guild by the name of the British Accreditation
Regency. See: The BAR Card.
From the book Fruit from a Poisonous Tree (page 58) by attorney
Melvin Stamper, JD:
 “The scheme also provided for the control of the courts via the 1913
creation of the American Bar Association, whose parent organization
was the European International Bar Association, which was the
creation of Rothschild. This allowed the International Bankers to
control the practice of law, in that the only ones permitted to practice
before the courts were those who were educated under their brand of
law, which was only Admiralty and Contract law. Common law of the
people was to be replaced as it gave the natural man many
jurisdictional protections from the bankers’ legislation.”

THE TWELVE
PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT
Canon 3228
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law,
but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions
presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become
fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”].
There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar
Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public
Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of
Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary,
Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:
1. The Presumption of Public Recordis that any matter brought
before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record
when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar
Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless
openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be
 on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild
matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and
2. The Presumption of Public Serviceis that all the members of the
Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath
to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or
“public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that
openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to
their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim
stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public
servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and
3. The Presumption of Public Oathis that all members of the Private
Bar Guild acting in the capacity of “public officials” who have sworn
a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore
bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their
oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption
stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under
their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged,
such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of
interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and
4. The Presumption of Immunityis that key members of the Private
Bar Guild in the capacity of “public officials” acting as judges,
prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath
in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and
liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the
presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as
public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are
immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and
5. The Presumption of Summonsis that by custom a summons un-
rebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed
to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of
the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons.
Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the
 rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and
position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands; and
6. The Presumption of Custodyis that by custom a summons or
warrant for arrest un-rebutted stands and therefore one who
attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be
detained in custody by “Custodians”. [This includes the dead legal
fiction non-human “PERSON” that corporate-governments rules
and regulations are written for.*] Custodians may only lawfully
hold custody of property and “things” not flesh and blood soul
possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by
rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you
are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in
custody by custodians; and
7. The Presumption of Court of Guardiansis the presumption that
as you may be listed as a “resident” of a ward of a local government
area and have listed on your “passport” the letter P, you are a
pauper and therefore under the “Guardian” powers of the
government and its agents as a “Court of Guardians”. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a
general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before
the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper,
and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of
guardians (clerk of magistrates court);
8. The Presumption of Court of Trusteesis that members of the
Private Bar Guild presume you accept the office of trustee as a
“public servant” and “government employee” just by attending a
Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the
rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this presumption
is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by “invitation”
to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or
public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is
 assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction
– simply because you “appeared”; and
9. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as
Executor and Beneficiaryis that for the matter at hand, the
Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of
Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of
the trust for the current matter. Unless this presumption is openly
challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and
general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the
presumption stands and you are by default the trustee, therefore
must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate); and
10. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tortis the presumption
that if the accused does seek to assert their right as Executor and
Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are acting as an
Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor” challenging the “rightful”
judge as Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the
role of “true” executor and has the right to have you arrested,
detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting one’s
position as Executor as well as questioning if the judge or
magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the
presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar
guild may seek to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their
false claim; and
11. The Presumption of Incompetenceis the presumption that
you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent to
present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the
judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested,
detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your
position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object
to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of
 pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can
do what they need to keep you obedient; and
12. The Presumption of Guiltis the presumption that as it is
presumed to be a private business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are
guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do not plead or plead “not
guilty”. Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an
affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice
onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is
you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is
prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from
you.
*More information about “personage” and “barratry” has been made
available by Anna von Reitz: The Nut is Cracked.

The Nut Is Cracked, by

Judge Anna von Reitz
http://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2014/08/01/the-real-
criminals/

The Real Criminals

1. Look up the Public Laws governing Citizen’s Arrest in your state.
Get ready to use them.
2. Now, let’s pretend we set up a system of “naming conventions”
such that the following rules apply:
john –quincy: adams = a living American endowed with all his
natural rights
John Quincy Adams = a foreign situs trust used in commercial
shipping
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS = a foreign estate trust
John Q. Adams = a public transmitting utility company
John q. Adams = a public foundation
JOHN Q. Adams = a cooperative
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS = a boat or ship used in public commerce
JOHN QUINCY Adams = a commonwealth trust
J. QUINCY Adams = a slave owned by Exxon Corporation
J.Q. Adams = a foreign pauper forbidden to own land
Adams, John Q. = a taxpayer
ADAMS, JOHN Q. = a soldier
adams, john q. = a slave
There are dozens of different potential meanings that can be
arbitrarily assigned to anyone’s name and used to “represent”
radically different entities. In a verbal conversation we can talk all
day long about someone or something named “John Quincy Adams”
and which john quincy adams or what kind of JOHN QUINCY ADAMS
will never be known, except from the context of the conversation —
but on paper the use of such a system instantly defines what or
whom is being talked about — if you know the system.
This is what the lawyers, bankers, and politicians have used to
enslave you. It is a crime known as “personage”. By arbitrarily
creating an Estate trust named after you and claiming to own this
thing they created, they have falsely claimed to own you and your
assets and to literally buy and sell “you” on stock exchanges, ship
“you” out of ports, and tax “you” for doing things you’ve never done.
After all, there is no law against enslaving an ESTATE trust, is there?
Or arresting a slave? Or charging a tax on importing revenue to
Puerto Rico?
 Hand in hand with personage comes “barratry” — the crime of
knowingly bringing false claims into court. So what happens every
day all across America, when charges are brought against the
ESTATES of “dead men” who are standing right in front of the judge
and jury? Barratry — a crime that is appropriately named after the
“Bar Association”.
3. Look at the front page of any law suit that has been filed in
America for the past seventy years and there you will have proof in
your hand of both personage and barratry being committed against
the individual people falsely named as “DEFENDANTS”. They are
being deliberately confused with foreign estate trusts merely named
after them and they are suffering the crimes of both personage and
barratry.
4. Spread this explanation of the situation throughout the world. Take
it to the provost marshals and the highest ranking police officers, to
the sheriffs, and the deputies and the traffic cops, to the mayors, to
the politicians responsible, to the bankers who have seized your
bank accounts under the same false pretenses.
5. Go in large groups, peaceably, but with grim determination. Take
your video cameras and tape recorders and stand ready to use
Citizen’s Arrest against any public official who does not agree to
assist you in shutting down the “court” system and arresting the
“District Attorneys” and “judges” and others who have participated
in this grotesque fraud. Demand that the bankers agree to correct
their records and honor your ownership of your private property
which has been deposited in their banks in good faith.
6. If any public official presented with this information refuses to help
you, arrest them and hold them to face charges before a Citizen’s
Grand Jury composed of twelve honest men who own land in your
county. If the Sheriff of your County refuses to do his duty when
confronted with this information, arrest him, and elect a new
Sheriff pro tem to serve in the office until proper elections can be
held.
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/rules/civil-procedure.pdf
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
WITH FORMS DECEMBER 1, 2013
http://www.uscourts.gov/rulesandpolicies/rules.aspx
Federal Rules of Practice & Procedure and etc.
http://www.uscourts.gov/RulesAndPolicies/rules/archives/report
s-judicial-conference.aspx
Reports to the Judicial Conference
http://www.uscourts.gov/RulesAndPolicies/ConductAndDisability.
aspx
Judicial Conduct & Disability
http://www.uscourts.gov/Common/Glossary.aspx Federal Court
Glossary of Legal Terms
FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DECEMBER 1, 2013
http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/rules/criminal-
procedure.pdf

NON VOTING
http://www.strike-the-root.com/vote.html
In his On The Duty of Civil Disobedience (1849), Henry David
Thoreau asked:
How does it become a man to behave toward this American
government to-day? I answer that he cannot without disgrace be
associated with it . . . . What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I
do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.
H.D. Thoreau
By Carl Watner
Readers of Strike The Root recognize that there are two principal
demands that their governments make upon them: pay your taxes
and vote. (Of course, there are many other “demands,” such as
military service, send your children to school, have a drivers license,
etc., but many of these are ancillary to the primary means of
government survival, which is the collection of taxes.)
Now, of these two principal demands, taxation carries criminal
sanctions: Pay your money or we imprison your body and/or
confiscate your property. However, as yet in most nations of the
world, failure to vote in government elections carries no penalty.
Governments, like all other hierarchical institutions, depend upon
the cooperation and, at least, the tacit consent of those over whom
they exercise power. In other words, government soldiers and
police can force people to do things they don’t want to do, but in the
long run–in the face of adamant opposition–such coercion is either
too expensive or too futile to accomplish its goals of subjugating
entire populations. It is far simpler to motivate people to do what
you want them to do, rather than forcing them to do it by pointing
guns at them all the time. As Boris Yeltsin supposedly said, “You can
build a throne with bayonets, but you can’t sit on it long.”
Educating generations of parents and children in government
schools and teaching them to be patriotic and
support their government in political elections is one of the
fundamental ways governments garner public support. Citizens are
taught that it is both their right and duty to vote. But all this is done
with an ulterior motive in mind. As Theodore Lowi, in his book
INCOMPLETE CONQUEST: GOVERNING AMERICA pointed out:
Participation is an instrument of [government] conquest because it
encourages people to give their consent to being governed . . . .
Deeply embedded in people’s sense of fair play is the principle that
those who play the game must accept the outcome. Those who
participate in politics are similarly committed, even if they are
consistently on the losing side. Why do politicians plead with
everyone to get out and vote? Because voting is the simplest and
easiest form of participation [of supporting the state] by masses of
people. Even though it is minimal participation, it is sufficient to
commit all voters to being governed, regardless of who wins.
Not voting in government elections is one way of refusing to
participate; of refusing to consent to government rule over your life.
Non-voting may be seen as an act of personal secession, of exposing
the myth behind “government by consent.” There are many reasons,
both moral and practical, for choosing “not to vote,” and they have
been discussed in my anthology, DISSENTING ELECTORATE. To
briefly summarize:
Truth does not depend upon a majority vote. Two plus two equals
four regardless of how many people vote that it equals five.
Individuals have rights which do not depend on the outcome of
elections. Majorities of voters cannot vote away the rights of a single
individual or groups of individuals.
Voting is implicitly a coercive act because it lends support to a
compulsory government.
Voting reinforces the legitimacy of the state because the
participation of the voters makes it appear that they approve of
their government.
There are ways of opposing the state, other than by voting “against”
the incumbents. (And remember, even if the opposition politicians
are the lesser of two evils, they are still evil.) Such non-political
methods as civil disobedience, non-violent resistance, home
schooling, bettering one’s self, and improving one’s own
understanding of voluntarism all go far in robbing the government
of its much sought after legitimacy.
As Thoreau pointed out, “All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers
or backgammon . . . . Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it.”
So whatever you do, don’t play the government’s game. Don’t
vote. Do something for the right.
Carl Watner (December 2009)