Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
With the decline of oil reserves around the world, finding an alternative and a renewable
resource is quite a challenge. In the Philippines, the Republic Act 9367 or the “Biofuels Act of
2006” was enacted on January 12, 2007 to prevent the country to depend on imported fuels and
ensure the availability of alternative and renewable clean energy without damaging the natural
ecosystem, biodiversity and food reserves of the country. On the Section 5 of the Republic Act
explains the mandatory use of biofuels which stated “a minimum of ten percent (10%) blend of
bioethanol by volume and a minimum of two percent (2%) blend of biodiesel by volume into all
gasoline fuel distributed and sold by each oil company in the country.” According to the National
Biofuels Board (NBB) of the country, supplying for the required blend for ethanol has been
problematic in ten years of the Biofuel Act’s implementation due to the inadequate production
from the local sources while the plan to increase the 2% blend of biodiesel was postponed due to
the increasing prices of biofuels (Global Agricultural Information Network [GAIN], 2016).
According to the news about the oil prices last May 2018, the Philippines is one of the
country who is at risk from rising oil prices which will continue to hurt the economy. According
to PhilStar, the country’s trade deficit “may increase by 0.5 percent of GDP for every $10 per
barrel rise in oil prices” With this the need in alternative and new resources for fuels remains.
One biofuel emerging in the market because of its advantages is butanol, also known as
biobutanol, which is produced from fermentable sugars, synthesis gas and glycerol. As stated by
Gable (2017) Biobutanol is less miscible with water and has higher energy content than ethanol,
so there is a much lower loss of fuel economy. With an energy content of about 105,000
BTUs/gallon (versus ethanol’s approximate 84,000 BTUs/gallon), biobutanol is much closer to
the energy content of gasoline (114,000 BTUs/gallon). Butanol meets the renewable fuel 20%
greenhouse gas-emission reduction threshold. It is less susceptible to separation in the presence
of water (than ethanol), it can be distributed via conventional infrastructure (pipelines, blending
facilities and storage tanks). There’s no need for a separate distribution network. (Gable, 2017)
Breakthroughs within the production of butanol have been made available. One of which
is the fermentation of biomass using “butanol-producing microorganism”. Butanol is naturally
produced by some Clostridia species, but due to inherent problems with clostridial
fermentations, industrially more relevant organisms have been genetically engineered for n-
butanol production. Although the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae holds significant advantages
in terms of scalable industrial fermentation, n-butanol yields and titers obtained so far are only
low (Schadeweg and Boles, 2016).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most common species of the genus Saccharomyces, commonly
known as baker’s or brewer’s yeast. Butanol tolerance is a critical factor affecting the ability of
microorganisms to generate economically viable quantities of butanol. There are many different
microorganisms that is used for butanol extraction but not all produce great amount of it.
Generally, a barrier to growth exists between 1% and 2% butanol and a few microorganisms can
tolerate 2% butanol. Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibits limited growth in 2% butanol.
In the Philippine sugar industry, bagasse is considered a major biomass waste produced
after the extraction of juice from the sugarcane stalk. Sugar mills are estimated to produce more
than 6 million metric tons of bagasse per year or 350,000 tons of dry bagasse per hectare (Sugar
Regulatory Administration [SRA], 2016). This abundance of sugarcane bagasse in the country
has been taken advantage of by millers in power generation for their boilers and by distilleries in
the production of ethanol, butanol and other biofuels.
The purpose of this study is to increase the production of butanol using fermentation
organism. It aims to initiate a new way to produce and increase a clean, renewable and locally
available source of energy without causing harm to health, natural ecosystem and environment.
If achieved the desired results, it may open a new opportunity to a new source of
renewable resource which can contribute to a big change in the country and the world as a whole.
HYPOTHESIS
Null Hypothesis
Alternative Hypothesis
Biobutanol - is produced from fermentable sugars, synthesis gas and glycerol, and
suitable for alternative fuel.
Sugarcane bagasse - is the dry pulpy fibrous residue that remains after sugarcane or
sorghum stalks are crushed to extract their juice.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Gathering and
Preparation of Pretreatment of
Preparation of
Stock Culture bagasse
materials
Fermentation Substrate
Additional trials Process and preparation and
analytical methods Inoculum Build Up
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Butanol, like ethanol, can be produced from fermentable sugars, synthesis gas, and
glycerol. Butanol has a number of notable qualities that make it a suitable alternative fuel. Its
energy content is 30% more than ethanol (Qureshi and Ezeji, 2008). It can be mixed with
gasoline in any proportion or be used as the sole fuel component (100% butanol) in unmodified
car engines (Ramey, 2007). It carries less water and, therefore, it can be transported through
existing gasoline pipelines (Dürre, 2007). Reports of biological butanol formation date back to
Louis Pasteur. He reported an alcohol product from a clostridial culture (Dürre, 2007). The ABE
fermentation was essential during World War I. Acetone was needed to prepare munitions, and it
was in great shortage at the time. Production of acetone by fermentation meant a constant supply
of acetone to Britain and its allies (Dürre, 2007).
Biobutanol is derived mainly from the fermentation of the sugars in organic feedstocks
(biomass). Historically, up until about the mid-50s, biobutanol was fermented from simple
sugars in a process that produced acetone and ethanol, in addition to the butanol component. The
process is known as ABE (Acetone Butanol Ethanol) and has used unsophisticated (and not
particularly hearty) microbes such as Clostridium acetobutylicum (Gable,2017). Butanol
tolerance is a critical factor affecting the ability of microorganisms to generate economically
viable quantities of butanol. Current Clostridium strains are unable to tolerate greater than 2% 1-
butanol thus membrane or gas stripping technologies to actively remove butanol during
fermentation are advantageous. To evaluate the potential of alternative hosts for butanol
production, we screened 24 different microorganisms for their tolerance to butanol. We found
that in general, a barrier to growth exists between 1% and 2% butanol and few microorganisms
can tolerate 2% butanol. Strains of Escherichia coli, Zymomonas mobilis, and non-
Saccharomyces yeasts were unable to surmount the 2% butanol growth barrier. Several strains of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibit limited growth in 2% butanol, while two strains of
Lactobacillus were able to tolerate and grow in up to 3% butanol (Knoshaug & Zhang, 2008).
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Materials
Christine, Gable, S., Christine, & Gable, S. (2017, March 15). The Process, Pros, and Cons of
Biobutanol. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from https://www.thoughtco.com/pros-cons-biobutanol-
85645
Knoshaug, E. P., & Zhang, M. (2008, December 17). Butanol Tolerance in a Selection of
Microorganisms. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12010-008-8460-4
Virginia Schadeweg, & Eckhard Boles. (2016, February 24). N-Butanol production in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is limited by the availability of coenzyme A and cytosolic acetyl-CoA.
Retrieved January 20, 2019, from
https://biotechnologyforbiofuels.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13068-016-0456-7
Rizal High School
Dr. Sixto Antonio Avenue, Caniogan, Pasig City
Tuico, Jenina C.
Benitez, Kaian V.
Elican, Joana Loraine G.
Morota, Arabella Nicole S.
Martinez, Kaya May O.
Roluna, Mariel D.
XI – STEM C
January 2019