You are on page 1of 8

7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

Fixed and Variable Costs


In connection with surfacing a new highway, a contractor  %ner&# !avin&s throu&h Increased Insulation
has a choice of two sites on which to set up the asphalt- This example deals with a discrete optimiAation problem of 
mixing plant equipment. The contractor estimates that it will determining the most economical amount of attic insulation
cost $1.15 per cubic yard mile yd!-mile" to haul the asphalt- for a large single-story home in Cirginia. In general, the heat
 pa#ing material from the mixing plant to the ob location. lost through the roof of a single-story home is
%actors relating to the two mixing sites are as follows
&roduction costs at each sites are the same"'
(ost factor )ite * )ite +
*#erage hauling  miles .! miles In southwest Cirginia, the number of heating days
distance
onthly rental of site $1,/// $5,///  per year is approximately 0!/, and the annual heating
(ot set up and degree-days equals 0!/ 5D%-D%" : !/ degree-days per 
$15,/// $05,/// year. ere, 5D% is assumed to be the a#erage inside
remo#e equipment
auling expense $1.152yd!-mile $1.152yd!-mile temperature and D% is the a#erage outside temperature
%lagperson 3ot required $42day each day.
The ob requires 5/,/// cubic yards of mixed- (onsider a 0,//-ft0  single-story house in
asphalt-pa#ing material. It is estimated that four months 1 +lac6sburg. They typical annual space-heating load for this
wee6s of fi#e wor6ing days per wee6" will be required for  siAe of a house is 1// x 1/  +TE. That is, with no insulation
the ob. (ompare the two sites in terms of their fixed, in the attic, we lose about 1// x 1/  +TF per year.G
#ariable and total costs. *ssume that the cost of the return (ommon sense dictates that the Hno insulation alternati#e is
trip is negotiable. 7hich is the better site8 %or the selected not attracti#e and is to be a#oided.
site, how many cubic yards of pa#ing material does the 7ith insulation in the attic, the amount of heat lost
contractor ha#e to deli#er before starting to ma6e a profit if  each year will be reduced. The #alue of energy sa#ings that
 paid $9./5 per cubic yard deli#ered to the ob location8 results from adding insulation and reducing heat loss is
dependent on what type of residential heating furnace is
Optimal Demand When Demand Is a Function of Price installed. %or this example, we assume that an electrical
* company produces an electronic timing switch that is used resistance furnace is installed by the builder, and its
in consumer and commercial products. The fixed cost  C  F " is efficiency is near 1//?.
$!,/// per month, and the #ariable cost (cv" is $9! per unit.  3ow weBre in a position to answer the following
The selling price per unit is  p : $19/ ; /./0 D", based on question' 7hat amount of insulation is most economical8
equation. %or this situation, a" determine the optimal *n additional piece of data we need to in#ol#es the cost of 
#olume for this product and confirm that a profit occurs electricity, which is $/.// per 67h. This can be con#erted
instead of a loss" at this demand< b" find the #olumes at to dollars per 1/J +TE as follows 167h : !,1! +tu"'
which brea6e#en occurs< that is, what is the range of 
 profitable demand8

Breakeven Point When Price Is Independent of Demand


*n engineering consulting firm measures its output in a The cost of se#eral insulation alternati#es and
standard ser#ice hour unit, which is a function of the associated space-heating loads for this house are gi#en in the
 personnel grades le#els in the professional staff. The following table
#ariable cost cv" is $0 per standard ser#ice hour. The *mount of Insulation
charge-out rate =i.e., selling price  p"> is $95.5 per hour. K11 K14 K!/ K!9
The maximum output of the firm is 1/,/// per year, and its In#estmen
// 4// 1!// 1//
fixed cost C  F " is $0,/0,/// per year. %or this firm, a" what t cost $"
is the brea6e#en point in standard ser#ice hours and in *nnual
 percentage of total capacity8 b" 7hat is the percentage heating
x1/ 4.9x1/ .0x1/ .0x1/
reduction in the brea6e#en point sensiti#ity" if fixed costs load
are reduced 1/?< if #ariable cost per hour is reduced 1/?< +tu2year"
and if the selling price per unit is increased by 1/?8
In #iew of these data, which amount of attic
Ho Fast !hould the "irplane Fl#$ insulation is most economical8 The life of the insulation is
The cost of operating a et-powered commercial passenger- estimated to be 05 years.
carrying" airplane #aries as the three-hal#es power of its
#elocity< specifically, ( @ : knv!20, when n is the trip length in 'o Produce or (ot to Produce$
miles, k is a constant of proportionality, and v is #elocity in * manufacturing plant consists of three departments' *, +,
miles per hour. It is 6nown that at // miles per hour, the and (. Lepartment  A  occupies 1// square meters in one
average  cost of operation is $!// per mile. The company corner of the plant. &roduct  X   is one of the se#eral products
that owns the aircraft wants to minimiAe the cost of   being produced in Lepartment  A. The daily production of 
operation, but that cost must be balanced against that cost of  &roduct X   is 5 pieces. The cost accounting records show
 passengersB time ( (", which has been set at $!//,/// per  the following a#erage daily production costs for &roduct M'
hour. a" *t what #elocity should the trip be planned to
minimiAe the total cost, which is the sum of the cost of 
operating the airplane and the cost of passengersB time8 b"
ow do you 6now that your answer for the problem in &art
* minimiAes the total cost8

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 1/8
7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

The department foreman has recently learned about an


outside company sells M at $/.!5 per piece. *ccordingly, the
foreman figured a cost per day of $/.!55" : $0/1./,
resulting
Therefore,ina aproposal
daily sa#ings of $099./-$0/1./:$9.9/.
was submitted to the plant manager 
for shutting down the production line of &roduct M and
 buying it from the outside company.
owe#er, after examining each component
separately, the plant manager decided not to accept the
foremanBs proposal based on the unit cost of product M'
1. Lirect labor' because the foreman was super#ising
the manufacture of the other products in
Lepartment * in addition to &roduct M, the only
 possible sa#ings in labor wound occur if the
operator wor6ing  hours per days on &roduct M
were not reassigned after this line is shut down.
That is, a maximum sa#ings of $4/.// per day
would result.
0. aterials' The maximum sa#ings on direct material
will be $9./. owe#er, this figure could be lower 
if some of the material for &roduct M is obtained
from scrap of another product.
!. @#erhead' +ecause other products are made in
Lepartment *, no reduction in total floor space
requirements will probably occur. Therefore, no
reduction in o#erhead costs will result from
discontinuing &roduct M. It has been estimated that
there will be daily sa#ings in the #ariable o#erhead
costs traceable to &roduct M of about $!.// due to a
reduction in power costs and in insurance
 premiums.

P)OB*%+!

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 2/8
7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 3/8
7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 4/8
7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 5/8
7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 6/8
7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 7/8
7/18/2019 Chapter 2 Engg Eco Reviewer

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/chapter-2-engg-eco-reviewer 8/8

You might also like