CONTRACTOR HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT (HIRA)

(HAND TOOLS)

Step Current Recommended Controls to

Task Steps Potential Hazards Existing or Current Controls Residual Risk
No Risk further mitigate the risk
List the normal steps of the What are the potential Are there any controls already in place for the If the risk is not tolerable as is,

Consequence

Consequence
Activity dangers that can cause potential hazards? List the existing Controls. establish further controls to mitigate

Likelihood

Likelihood
Ranking

Ranking
harm at each task step? Focusing on Hierarchy of control (Eliminate, the risk
List the potential Substitute, Isolate, Engineering,
hazards Administrative and Personal Protective
Equipment)

Hand - Tools in plant area
1 2
Slip trip & fall Stay clear & awareness
Flying objects Correct eye protection
Hand & body injury’s Correct PPE
Uneven services Watch your step & be aware
Poor illumination Stop & report
Overhead obstructions Be aware of surroundings when doing
housekeeping
Electrical safety Don’t clean directly on electrical equipment
PTO’s
Be alert and stay clear
Risk – Assessments
Moving equipment Avoid horse play at all times
C 8 Toolbox Talks 2 D 5
Horse play Take reasonable brakes as described by
Training
Fatigue Awareness
Only competent person with correct permit as
Inspections per procedure to perform task
Confined space Be alert and stay clear
Mobile equipment Use dust mask
Dust Awareness and correct PPE
Weather conditions Good housekeeping
Falling objects Use correct tools for the correct job
Defective tools
 FATAL HAZARDS IDENTIFIED

No Fatal Hazard Identified Critical Controls

1 Inappropriate Emergency Response
A risk assessment must be conducted to
identify potential emergency situations,
and an Emergency Response Management
Plan developed, implemented and
Maintained.
• There must be adequate emergency
equipment, including escape and rescue
apparatus (readily accessible and clearly
signposted) and appropriate transport and
Response vehicles.
• There must be effective and robust
communication devices and procedures
for the initial notification of personnel of
the emergency situation and for ongoing
Two-way communication.
• Duty cards must be developed that clearly
identify each of the responsible persons,
their duties, functions and reporting
relationships in the event of an
Emergency.

CONTRACTOR HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT (HIRA)

RISK ASSESSMENT TEAM MEMBERS (In participation with Glencore (contractor owner))
INITIALS AND SURNAME OCCUPATION ID NUMBER DATE SIGNATURE

Consequences are to be determined with consideration of existing controls and their effectiveness
Health & Safety
 Multiple fatalities
 Multiple cases of
5 permanent total
Catastrophic disability / health effects
 Fatality or permanent
incapacity / health
effects
4 remediation
Major
 Lost time / disabling
injury / occupational
3 health effects / multiple
medical treatments
Moderate
 Medical Treatment
Injury (MTI) /
2 occupational health
effects
Minor
 Restricted Work Injury
(RWI)
 First Aid Injury (FAI) /
illness
1 or effect
Negligible
CONSEQUENCE [Potential foreseeable outcome of the Event]
Environment Financial Impact Image & Reputation / Community Legal & Compliance
 Environmental damage  >$500M operating  Negative media coverage at international level  Major litigation /
or effect (permanent; profit  Loss of multiple major customers or large prosecution at Glencore
>10 years)  >$200M property proportion of sales contracts corporate level
 Requires major damage  Loss of community support  Nationalisation / loss of
remediation licence to operate
 Significant negative impact on the share price
 Long-term (2 to 10  $100-500M operating  Negative media coverage at national level  Major litigation /
years) impact profit  Scrutiny from government and NGOs prosecution at Division
 Requires significant  $50-200M property level
damage
 Complaints from multiple “final” customers
 Loss of major customer
 Loss of community support
 Negative impact on share price
 Medium-term (<2 years)  $50-100M operating  Negative media coverage at local / regional  Major litigation /
impact profit level over more than one day prosecution at
 Requires moderate  $5-50M property  Complaint from a “final” customer Operation level
remediation damage
 Off-spec product
 Community complaint resulting in social issue
 Short-term impact  $5-50M operating  Complaint received from stakeholder or  Regulation breaches
 Requires minor profit community resulting in fine or
remediation  $1-5M property  Negative local media coverage litigation
damage
 No lasting  <$5M operating profit  Negligible media coverage  Regulation breaches
environmental damage  <$1M property without fine or litigation
damage
 Requires minor or no
remediation
 LIKELIHOOD [of the event occurring with that consequence]
Basis of Rating E - Rare D - Unlikely C - Possible B - Likely A – Almost Certain
LIFETIME Unlikely to occur during a Could occur about once Could occur more than May occur about once May occur several times
lifetime during a lifetime once during a lifetime per year per year
OR OR OR OR OR OR
PROJECT OR TRIAL OR Very unlikely to occur More likely NOT to occur As likely to occur as not More likely to occur than Expected to occur
FIXED TIME PERIOD than to occur to occur not occur
OR OR OR OR OR OR
NEW PROCESS / PLANT / No known occurrences in Has occurred at least Has occurred at least Has occurred at least Has occurred several
R&D broader worldwide once in broader once in the mining / once within Glencore times within Glencore
industry worldwide industry commodities trading
industries

5
Catastrophic
15 (M) 19 (H) 22 (H) 24 (H) 25 (H)
4
Major
10 (M) 14 (M) 18 (H) 21 (H) 23 (H)
3
Moderate
6 (L) 9 (M) 13 (M) 17 (H) 20 (H)
2
Minor
3 (L) 5 (L) 8 (M) 12 (M) 16 (M)
1
Negligible
1 (L) 2 (L) 4 (L) 7 (M) 11 (M)
 Consequence Consequence
Risk Rank Risk Rating Ownership Action Ownership Action
Category Type
Divisional /  Normally considered intolerable, and will require senior Divisional /  Quantitative or semi-quantitative risk assessment
Functional / manager approval to continue activity Functional / required.
Operational / Operational /
 Install additional HARD and SOFT controls to achieve  Capital expenditure will be justified to achieve ALARP
17 to 25 High Risk Asset Leadership
ALARP.
Asset Leadership
('As Low As Reasonably Practicable').
 Capital expenditure will be justified to achieve ALARP.
Cat. 5 Catastrophic
 Catastrophic Hazard Management Plans (CHMP) must
be implemented where practical, Crisis Management
Plans (CMP) tested and Catastrophic Event Recovery
Operational /  Normally considered tolerable however may be required to
Plans (CERP) developed.
Medium Asset Leadership install additional HARD and SOFT controls if necessary to
7 to 16 Risk
achieve ALARP.
Divisional /  Safe Work Fatal Hazard Protocols or appropriate
 Capital expenditure may be justified. Cat. 4 Functional / management plans must be applied.
Operational /
(Health &  Capital expenditure will be justified to achieve ALARP.
Operational /  Tolerable Fatal Hazard Asset Leadership
Asset Leadership Safety
1 to 6 Low Risk  Install additional controls if necessary to achieve ALARP.
consequence)
 Capital expenditure is not usually justified.