Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CL Section Exercise 3-ENG10
CL Section Exercise 3-ENG10
Figure 2.1 Usual Woody Material Structure of (A) Cellulose, Lignin and
Hemicellulose, and (B) Cellulose alone (Fortunati et al., 2016)
Fortunati et al. (2016) state that cellulose is a polymer that is considered as one of the most abundant and
naturally-occurring among its kind and it has been known as a plausible raw material biochemical processing.
Fortunati et al. add that hemicellulose, on the other hand, is a polysaccharide found in plant cell walls that includes
xylans, mannans and glucomannans. Meanwhile, lignin is an aromatic polymer that forms a layer covering around the
two other parts that provides sturdiness to the plant; however, lignin is generally considered to be a waste material in
most processing (Fortunati et al., 2016). Lignin is identified as a major limiting factor among all biomass components
(Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016).
Lignocellulosic materials such as corn cobs are known for being renewable and natural and having promising
potentials in the modern industrial and biochemical societies, as large amounts of similar biomass may be used in
production of valuable products (Fortunati et al., 2016).
1
Name: Date:
Course Code and Section: Course Degree and Year:
serves as a sweetener for diabetic patients due to its non-cariogenic properties and non-fermentability and its
sweetness level is comparable with sucrose (Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016). Moreover, consumption of xylitol is
associated with several beneficial health effects such as significant reduction in tooth decay, increased bone density,
weight loss and stabilization of blood sugar level (Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016).
Xylitol can be produced by natural extraction, chemical processing, or biochemical production. Xylitol can be
obtained from fruits and vegetables naturally containing xylitol, such as raspberry, strawberry and yellow plum
(Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016). However, the extraction process is not cost-effective due to low xylitol contents of
these natural sources (Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016). On the other hand, Figure 2.2 shows the general procedures
in chemical and biochemical production processes as suggested by Vallejos and Area (2017).
Figure 2.2 General Xylitol Production Process (Vallejos & Area, 2017)
As seen in the figure above, xylitol production through chemical processing involves catalytic
dehydrogenation of pure xylose (Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016; Vallejos & Area, 2017). It is costly and requires a
lot of energy, and imposes environmental risk due to the toxic catalyst and the presence of high-pressure hydrogen
gas (Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016; Vallejos & Area, 2017). Afterwards, it undergoes downstream processing to
obtain xylitol of high purity.
As shown also in Figure 2.2 is the biotechnological pathway or the microbial production of xylitol from
agricultural wastes. After detoxifying the hydrolysates containing the target sugar (xylose), a microorganism is added
to proceed with fermentation. The use of yeast strains such as the Candida species has recently attracted much
attention (Barathikannan & Agastian, 2016; Horiuchi & Tada, 2005). According to Barathikannan and Agastian (2016)
and Vallejos and Area (2017), xylitol production from microorganisms has been considered sustainable because the
process can be conducted under mild controlled conditions and can produce xylitol a lot cheaper than other methods
with low environmental impact and high sustainability.
2.4 Detoxification
Detoxification is a method where inhibitors of fermentation by microorganisms are removed. Inhibitors are
compounds that can limit the uptake of xylose, reduce the growth of microorganisms, or totally stop the fermentation
from occurring.
The main inhibitors in the microbial production of xylitol with acid hydrolysates as substrate are: (1) mineral
deposits from biomass itself or from the corrosion of the equipment; (2) hemicellulose degradation products such as
furfuralthe phenolic compounds and aldehyde aromatic compounds; and (4) derivatives of extractives (Vallejos &
2
Name: Date:
Course Code and Section: Course Degree and Year:
Area, 2017). Detoxification and pretreatment methods, which can involve physical, chemical, biological, and combined
methods, provide better accessibility to the necessary compounds after the hydrolysis of hemicellulose by overcoming
the complex structure of lignocellulosic biomass to allow the fermentation of usable sugars (Vallejos & Area, 2017).
Detoxification can involve physical, chemical or biological methods, or a combination of any of these.
“Physical methods mainly include evaporation, stream stripping, solvent extraction, and membrane separation”
(Vallejos & Area, 2017, p. 416). Physical methods include vacuum evaporation and stream stripping. Both methods
remove volatile compounds (acetic and formic acid) by more than 50% and a 100% removal of furfural, as well
increasing the amount of xylose necessary for biotechnological purposes (Vallejos & Area, 2017).
Vallejos and Area (2017) describe the chemical methods as methods that generally involve selective removal
of inhibitors by extraction by organic solvents. These organic solvents could either be ethyl acetate and similar
compounds or alkaline chemicals. According to Vallejos and Area, ethyl acetate totally eliminates the presence of
furfural, phenolic compounds, while trichloroethylene and benzene are the best solvents for acetic acid removal.
Moreover, various alkaline chemicals (NaOH, Ca(OH)2, NH OH, Na SO3, and others) are used in neutralization
methods which change the pH of the hydrolysates from acidic to neutral (pH 5.5–6.0). Adsorption by activated
charcoal is also classified under chemical methods and is an effective and low-cost method that specifically removes
HMF, furfural, and phenolic compounds, without xylose loss, while adsorption by ion exchange is used to remove
ions, both organic and inorganic, because of its desalination capability (Vallejos & Area, 2017).
Vallejos and Area (2017) add biological methods to the list and describe it as methods that are “based on the
use of microorganisms for the selective removal of inhibitors (S. cerevisiae mutant, Trichoderma reesei, others). They
were generalized to eliminate a given type of inhibitor, but the adaptation of the microorganism can be limited” (p.
418).
Detoxification by combined methods may include any of the previously discussed methods done after
another. An example is vacuum evaporation together with activated charcoal which further decreases the
concentration of acetic acid, HMF, furfural, and phenolic compounds (Vallejos & Area, 2017).