IN TH E C OU R T OF TH E II A DD L.

J UN IOR C IVIL JU D GE AT
WA R A N GA L

O.S.N o. 916 of 20 11 .
B e twe e n:-

P ola Ve nk a ta ia h … Pla intiff

A nd

S a ra ju K um a ra s wa m y … D e fe nda nt

WR ITTEN STATEMEN T FILED B Y TH E D EFEND A N T U ND ER

OR D ER VIII R U LE 1 OF C .P.C .

The de fe nda nt hum bly s ubm its his wr itte n s ta te m e nt a s

he r e unde r :-

1) A ll the pla int a v er m e nts , whic h ar e s pec ific a lly a dm itte d

he r e in by the de fe nda nt ar e tr ue a nd c or r ec t a nd the r es t
of the ple a dings in the pla int ar e de em e d to ha v e be e n
de nie d by the de fe nda nt, the pla intiff is put to s tr ic t pr oof
of the s a me .

2) The s uit is not m a inta ina ble , e ither in the la w or the on

fa c ts , a nd it des e r ve s to be dis m iss e d with e xe m pla r y
c os ts , the pla intiff ’s s uit doe s not de se r ve s for a ny
c ons ide r a tion m uc h le s s to se e k the pla int r e lie f as
a lle ge d in the pla int.

3) In r e ply to pa r a N o.I a nd II of the pla int, whic h de a ls with

the de s cr iptio n of the pa r tie s a nd whic h nee ds no s pec ific
r e ply.

4) In r e ply to pa r a N o.III of the pla int tha t the de fe nda nt

obta ine d the ha nd loa n of R s .10 ,0 0 0 /- fr om the pla intiff for
his fa m ily a nd pe r s ona l nec e s s itie s on 1 5 -12 -2 00 8 a nd
a gr e e d to pa y s a id am ount toge the r with inte r e s t @1% pe r
m onth a nd e xe c ute d a pr onote for R s .1 0 ,00 0 /- in fav our of
the pla intiff on the sa m e day in the pre s e nc e of
witne s s e s , ar e a ll fa ls e a nd bas e le s s , he nc e de nie d by
this de fe nda nt.

5) In r e ply to pa r a N o.IV of the pla int tha t the de fe nda nt

ne ithe r pa id the inte r e s t nor the pr inc ipa l am ount to the
…contd
 P-2

pla intiff ins pite of s e ve r a l de ma nds . The de fe nda nt

dodge d the r e pa ym e nt of s uit am ount unde r one or the
othe r pr e tex t. The de fe nda nt did not r e s pond in this
r e gar d ins pite of s e ve r a l de m a nds ma de by him , tha t the
pla intiff v ex e d with the a ttitude of the de fe nda nt is s ue d
le ga l notic e dt:1 8 -11 -20 1 0 to the de fe nda nt ca llin g him to
pa y the ha nd loa n a m ount toge the r with inte re s t a nd the
de fe nda nt re c e ive d the sa me , but he ne ithe r r e plie d to the
le ga l notic e nor pa id the s uit pr onote am ount, a re a ll fa ls e
a nd ba s e les s , he nc e de nie d by the de fe nda nt.

6) In r e ply to pa r a N o.V of the pla int tha t this de fe nda nt is

lia ble to pa y the s uit a m ount due unde r the pr onote a nd
he is lia ble to pa y a n am ount of Rs .1 4 ,1 2 7 /- inc lud ing
inte r e s t fr om 1 5 -12 -2 00 8 to 2 3 -12 -2 01 0 , a r e a ll fa ls e a nd
ba s e le ss , he nc e de nie d by the de fe nda nt.

7) The de fe nda nt s ubm itting the br ie f fa c ts of the c as e a s

unde r :-

The pla intiff a nd de fe nda nt a long with one Md.

K ha s im we r e done a c ontr a c t wor k (IB ) wor th of
R s .5 ,0 0 ,00 0 /- in the na m e of Ma dik a nti Ra ja m ma . Afte r
c om ple tion of the wor k , the pla intiff a nd de fe nda nt a nd
a ls o one Md. K ha s im a nd Ma dik a nti Ya da ia h sa t be fore the
e lde r s a nd done the a c c ounts of the s a id c ontr a c t wor k .
It is found tha t the pla intiff is due an a m ount of
R s .1 8 ,00 0 /- to this de fe nda nt a nd the s ha r es of the
pla intiff a nd sa id K has im a re c le ar e d. The de fe nda nt
s e ve r a l tim es de m a nde d the pla intiff to re pa y the sa id
a m ount, but the pla intiff nev e r r es pond to the wor ds of
the de fe nda nt a nd did not c hoos e to re pa y the sa m e to
him . A nd in or der to e s ca pe fr om his lia bility to pay a n
a m ount of Rs .1 8 ,0 0 0 /- to the de fe nda nt, the pla intiff ha s
c re a te d a nd fa br ic a te d the a lle ge d s uit pr onote a nd
for ge d the s igna tur e s of this de fe nda nt. The s igna tur e s
a ppe a r ing on the s uit pr onote of the a lle ge d witne s s e s
a re s igne d by a lle ge d s cr ibe r of the s a id pr onote i.e ., K .
Sudha k a r a nd the r e is no s uc h pe r s on av a ila ble in my
 P-3

v illa ge , this de fe nda nt no wa y c onc er ne d with sa id

Sudha k a r a nd the s igna tur e s on the s uit pr onote a re not
be longs to this de fe nda nt. This de fe nda nt ne v e r r e ce iv e d
a ny le ga l notic e par tic ula r ly whic h is file d in this s uit a nd
the s igna tur e on the pos ta l a ck nowle d gm e nt ca r d is not
be longs to this de fe nda nt.

8) The r e is no ca us e of a c tion to file the pr es e nt s uit a ga ins t

this de fe nda nt. The a lle ge d da te s m e ntione d in the ca us e
of a c tion ar e cr e a te d by the pla intiff for the pur pos e of
filing of the a bov e fa ls e s uit.

9) The pla intiff is not e ntitle d for a ny r e lie f a ga ins t this

de fe nda nt a nd the s a me is lia ble to be dis m is s e d in lim ini.

1 0 ) The r e a r e no me r its in the s uit.

It is the r e for e pr ay e d tha t the H on. C our t m ay be ple a s e d

to dis m is s the s uit with ex e m pla ry c os ts , in the inte r e s t of
jus tic e .

D EFEN DA N T

V E R IFIC ATION :- I, the a bove na m e d de fe nda nt, do he r e by

de c la r e tha t the c onte nts of the a bov e wr itte n s ta tem e nt ar e
tr ue a nd c or re c t to the be s t of my k nowle dge a nd be lie f, he nc e
v er ifie d a nd s igne d on this day of J uly, 2 0 12 at Wa r a nga l.

DEFEN D AN T
A D VOCATE FOR DEFEN D AN T.