Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RICHMOND
E-TRAY EXERCISE
Marking Guidelines
August 2007 0
CAREERS CENTRE
MARKING GUIDELINES
In ‘real life’ assessments, in-tray exercises are very time-consuming to mark and assess.
Where the exercise has been completed electronically, there are usually some elements
of automatic scoring which can reduce the amount of manual scoring involved (for
example, prioritisation). However, there may be elements which will need to be manually
assessed, for example, assessing the rationale behind decisions and looking at the style,
structure and tone of written communication.
When considering your own in-tray, it is important that you don’t get too caught up in what
is the ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answer – sometimes, the actual answer is not important but rather
the way in which you reached the decision and whether you can logically justify it.
Therefore, try to think about the competences you have demonstrated through the
exercise, for example:
Time Management:
Did you complete all the tasks within the timescale given?
Did you plan your time sufficiently in order to spend enough time on each task?
Did you spend too much time on one particular aspect to the detriment of other
tasks?
Were you able to delegate any tasks, for example, to an administrator or
secretary? Was this delegation appropriate?
Communication Skills:
How clear are your action plans?
Is the response letter appropriately structured to reflect a business letter?
Is the language/tone of your letter suitable, and tailored to your audience?
Have you provided a clear justification for your decision?
Is it professional?
Problem Solving:
Did you identify the links between items?
Did you make appropriate use of the information provided to come up with logical
decisions/actions?
Did you identify and manage conflicts?
Did you come up with any creative or innovative solutions?
August 2007 1
CAREERS CENTRE
August 2007 2
CAREERS CENTRE
August 2007 3
CAREERS CENTRE
With regards to your letter to the Synchronised Swimming Society, you should consider the following
points:
Structure:
Layout/format:
Your letter should contain clear paragraphs, including an introduction, main body of letter and
close
Your decision (positive or negative), and the reasons for it, should be clear to the reader
Language/tone:
Grammar/spelling:
Other considerations:
Any sponsorship must have a clear business benefit – what are the business benefits to
Richmond in this case?
Who would the message actually reach – we have not been advised that Richmond have any
branches in Europe
What is the ethical stance on this – would it be wrong to attribute weight loss to Richmond
products if this was not actually the case?
How would the money actually be spent, is further information required?
Is the request reasonable?
August 2007 4