Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANA Event Marketing Benchmark Report
ANA Event Marketing Benchmark Report
In today’s digital environment, the manner in which events are being perceived and utilized by organizations is rapidly
changing. Events are no longer silo’ed; they are reaching across business units and having a real impact on the entire
organization.
For this reason, companies are putting greater emphasis on their event strategies and programs with a profound focus
on getting the proper return from hosting events. Event marketing programs are typically comprised of a selection of the
following types of events: tradeshows, conferences, roadshows, webinars, trainings, seminars, galas, user conferences,
networking events, field marketing and virtual events.
There’s little doubt that all event details, from logistics to marketing to management, are changing rapidly and that
marketers need to be aware of these changes as they market events.
In a study sponsored by Cvent, Demand Metric conducted a survey to find out about the current state of event marketing. The
study’s goal was to understand the interest in and success with event marketing, gaining insights from which to derive
best practices.
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This study’s participants were primarily marketers in both B2B and B2C organizations. Participants represented a wide range of
industry affiliation, company sizes and job roles. Responses were collected from those who both attend and host events.
Our analysis focused on the effectiveness and ROI of events as well as the degree of satisfaction with events.
Furthermore, we examined the strategies, tactics, tools and metrics used to produce successful events.
The analysis of this study’s data provides these key findings about the current state of event marketing:
Participants consider events to be valuable as an attendee or as a host. Three-quarters of respondents indicated that
events are a medium (38%) or high (41%) priority or area of investment.
The two primary goals of event marketing are customer engagement and demand/lead generation. 71% and 70% of
respondents, respectively, chose these two options as leading objectives for event programs.
More effective events lead to higher ROI and lead volume. Events that are well attended provide value for attendees as
well as new leads for sales to drive more revenue than those that are not well attended.
ROI is related to hosting more events. Companies that host 6 or more events annually are more likely to report getting
better ROI from their events. Best practice holds that event planning and management requires strong strategies and tools.
The importance of marketing events to demand and lead generation is growing. 60% of those surveyed see events
becoming more important in the next year.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The right tools make a big difference in satisfaction with lead volume generated. The primary tools that lead to greater
satisfaction with lead volume are event management software, mobile apps, mobile marketing and CRM system integration.
Measurement matters. Those who are not using metrics to track event performance are less likely to be satisfied with the
volume of leads that marketing events produce annually.
This report details the results and insights from the analysis of the study data. For more detail on the survey participants, please
refer to the Appendix.
5
THE STATE OF EVENT MARKETING
Figure 1: More than three-quarters of participants rated events as a medium or high priority.
6
THE STATE OF EVENT MARKETING
The value of events becomes clearer when participants discuss how events fit into their overall strategy for demand generation.
Participants were asked to rank a given set of initiatives and the results of this inquiry provided the following list in rank order:
In this survey, events were the top priority, followed by website experience, email marketing and content marketing.
Participants were also given the option to write-in demand generation efforts not listed that are priorities for their organizations.
Write-in responses included the following: “app download, brand perception”, “internet aggregators”, “account-based marketing”,
“paid search, paid social” and “word of mouth marketing”.
7
ATTENDING & HOSTING EVENTS
Figure 2: 98% of organizations are attending events regularly.
8
ATTENDING & HOSTING EVENTS
Figure 3: More than half of companies are hosting between 1 and 5 events annually.
9
GOALS FOR HOSTING EVENTS
Figure 4: Customer engagement and demand/lead generation were the most commonly selected
goals for an event marketing program.
In order to guide spending for events, marketers must be
Primary Goals for Hosting Events clear on their purpose for building an event marketing
program. Participants were given a list of goals for hosting
Other Goals 6% events and asked to select all that apply (Figure 4).
Product Launch 18% When asked to describe their primary goals for hosting
Customer Upsell 27% events, 71% of the participants named customer
engagement as the primary goal, followed closely by
Lead Nurturing 36%
demand/lead generation at 70%.
Build Loyalty 37%
Product Education & Training 43% Our analysis indicates a relationship between event
goal and satisfaction with lead volume. Those whose
Build Brand Awareness 54% goal is lead nurturing or product education & training are
Demand/Lead Generation 70% more likely to be satisfied with the volume of leads their
events produce annually. On the other hand, those focused
Customer Engagement 71% on building brand awareness are less likely to be satisfied
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% with the volume of leads that events produce annually.
Administrator 9%
Other 10% Organizations are also establishing goals in terms of target
audiences. Participants were asked to identify the job roles
Developer/Technical 15% they target and the results are presented in Figure 5.
User 29% When it comes to the goal for the type of attendees
Product/Service Buyer 41% companies want to attract to their events, the top attendee
draws are Director (62%), Executive (61%), Manager (57%)
Manager 56% and Product/Service Buyer (41%).
Executive (C-suite) 61%
As expected, this data verifies the commonly held
Director 62% belief that companies are looking to attract attendees
with decision-making power and buying authority.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
11
EVENT MARKETING EFFECTIVENESS
Figure 6: 68% of participants believe events are an effective or very effective channel for meeting
marketing goals.
12
EVENT MARKETING TOOLS & TECHNOLOGIES
Figure 7: Email marketing is the most commonly used event marketing tool/technology.
13
EVENT MARKETING TOOLS & TECHNOLOGIES
When we compared the tools used to enable overall event effectiveness, the analysis showed two tools are clearly
related to greater event effectiveness: email marketing and CRM integration. This does not indicate that other tools are not
effective, just that these two tools were particularly effective in enabling a successful event marketing program.
What is clear, however, is that there is a growing importance for CRM integration with all marketing activities, including event
marketing. Demand Metric believes that CRM integration is driven by a desire for increased customer engagement,
which was named in this survey as the primary goal for events by 71% of participants. Better customer engagement
requires better customer profiling and personalization, which CRM systems can provide.
14
EVENT MARKETING METRICS & ROI
Figure 8: Attendance, leads generated and registration were ranked as the most commonly used
metrics to measure event performance.
ROI has become a critical metric for all marketing
Usage of Event Marketing Metrics
activities and marketing events are no exception.
Other Metrics 4%
Lead Flow or Volume 7% To determine how event performance is measured, we
No Metrics in Use 9% asked participants to share their approaches and the key
Cost of New Customer Acquisition 16% metrics being used by their organizations. Participants were
Leads by Source 21% given a list of common metrics and asked to select all that
Cost Per Lead/Qualified Lead 23%
apply to their strategy. Figure 8 highlights the results.
Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs) 25%
Pipeline Created 30%
Sales Qualified Leads (SQLs) 35% More than half of all participants are using attendance
Conversion Rates 36% (66%), leads generated (61%) and registration (56%) to
Email Open Rates 38% measure event performance. A total of 9% of participants
Revenue Generated 38% do not use any metrics to track event performance.
Registration 57%
Leads Generated 63%
Respondents who chose the “Other Metrics” option were
Attendance 66%
encouraged to include additional comments. Some write-in
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% responses given were “conference attendees (practitioners
and not other vendors) completing a survey at the booth”,
“content engagement”, “feedback post event” and
Event Marketing Benchmark Study, Demand Metric, November 2014, n=161 “pipeline touched”.
15
EVENT MARKETING METRICS & ROI
Figure 9: 58% of respondents indicated a vague or non-existent understanding of event ROI.
Despite the importance of ROI to event performance,
Understanding of ROI from Hosting Events most participants were not confident in their ability to
50% precisely predict the ROI of event performance. 58%
indicated a vague or non-existent understanding of their
ROI for events. Conversely, only 42% said their knowledge
40% of event ROI was “sufficiently accurate” or “very precise”.
40%
35% In order to understand the impact of events on demand
30%
gen, the value, drivers and revenue impact of events were
assessed between those who hosted fewer events and
20% those who hosted many events. This analysis shows:
However, the analysis also showed that simply hosting more events or spending more money did not automatically result in
higher event marketing effectiveness. Proper planning, management and tools are necessary ingredients for effectiveness. In
particular, tools and tactics have an important correlation to satisfaction with lead volume, as discussed in the Lead
Volume Satisfaction section of this report.
17
LEAD VOLUME SATISIFACTION
Figure 10: 35% of participants were satisfied or very satisfied with their lead volume from events.
18
LEAD VOLUME SATISIFACTION
Participants who are not using metrics to track events performance are less likely to be satisfied with the volume of leads their
marketing events produce annually.
Organizations may avoid using tools because they are concerned with not generating enough leads and producing enough
revenue to cover the costs of more sophisticated event marketing technologies and software.
However, in light of this data presented in Figure 10, marketers should evaluate their event tools and consider the
investment in satisfaction-generating technologies, such as event management software, mobile marketing apps and
CRM integration.
19
EVENT MARKETING CHALLENGES
Survey participants were asked about the challenges to creating successful events. The results were in line with expectations.
Here is the ranked list (from most challenging to least) of challenges presented:
The top challenge for marketers hosting events was drawing attendees to the event, followed by generating enough
leads, tracking and measuring impact, better attendee engagement and producing quality content.
20
THE FUTURE OF EVENT MARKETING
Figure 11: 95% of survey participants believe that event marketing efforts will remain the same or
grow in significance in the next 12-18 months.
40%
Overall, companies value events as a marketing tool.
39%
This survey shows that most companies believe that events
35%
30% will become even more important in the upcoming year.
21
ANALYST BOTTOM LINE
This study proves that events are a key component of the marketers’ playbook; and marketing events are critical to
effective demand generation activities.
Event effectiveness is not dependent simply on hosting more events or spending more money. One event can be as valuable to
your organization’s demand generation efforts as a dozen. What does matter is: proper planning, management and tools.
Best practice holds that event planning and management requires strong strategies, tactics and tools. Those companies that
have invested in these have reaped the rewards in increased event effectiveness and higher satisfaction with lead
volume. Thus, event marketers should evaluate their tools, in light of this data, and consider the investment in satisfaction-
generating tools like event management software, mobile marketing apps and CRM integration to increase effectiveness.
Use this benchmark study as a guide to evaluate how effective your organization is with event marketing and to take
steps to increase the value of your events for all participants.
22
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Demand Metric is grateful to Cvent for sponsoring this benchmarking study and for those participants that took the time to
provide their input to it.
Demand Metric acknowledges the advice and assistance of Dr. Tom Brown, Noble Foundation Chair in Marketing Strategy and
Professor of Marketing in the Spears School of Business at Oklahoma State University, in facilitating and providing counsel on
the analysis of these survey results.
23
ABOUT CVENT
Cvent, Inc. (NYSE: CVT) is a leading cloud-based enterprise event management platform, with more than 1,450 employees and
more than 12,600 customers worldwide. Cvent offers software solutions to event planners for online event registration, venue
selection, event management, mobile apps for events, e-mail marketing and web surveys.
Cvent provides hotels with a targeted advertising platform designed to reach event planners looking for suitable venues. Cvent
solutions optimize the entire event management value chain and have enabled clients around the world to manage hundreds of
thousands of meetings and events.
24
ABOUT DEMAND METRIC
Demand Metric is a marketing research and advisory firm serving a membership community of over 50,000 marketing
professionals and consultants in 75 countries.
Offering consulting methodologies, advisory services, and 500+ premium marketing tools and templates, Demand Metric
resources and expertise help the marketing community plan more efficiently and effectively, answer the difficult questions about
their work with authority and conviction and complete marketing projects more quickly and with greater confidence, boosting the
respect of the marketing team and making it easier to justify resources the team needs to succeed.
25
APPENDIX – SURVEY BACKGROUND
This Demand Metric Benchmark Study survey was administered online during the period of October 27, 2014 through November
11, 2014. During this period, 225 responses were collected, 12 of which were disqualified and 161 of which were complete
enough for inclusion in the analysis. The data was analyzed using SPSS to ensure the statistical validity of the findings. The
representativeness of these results depends on the similarity of the sample to environments in which this survey data is used for
comparison or guidance.
Summarized below is the basic categorization data collected about respondents to enable filtering and analysis of the data:
26
Benchmark Report