PRSEC/R/E/20/00200

President of India Secretariat 18/02/2020

New Delhi- 110001 { India}

Kind attention:- Nodal Officer for Right To Information

Issue:- alarming inequalities ;legitimization of corruption and/or abuse of public money in our PSU Insurance/PSU banks.
Re:- Seeking information in terms of Right to information Act,2005
Information required *** http://newsonair.com/Text-Bulletin-Details.aspx?id=33047
1. The applicant seeks information of the written The Supreme Court has said that people have a fundamental right to protest
orders of our Supreme court that peaceful peacefully & lawfully but blocking public roads is a matter of concern as it might
protest is a fundamental right of the citizens lead to chaotic situation. It stressed that there has to be a balancing balancing
factor. The court was hearing pleas yesterday over the road block due to ongoing
protests at Shaheen Bagh in Delhi against the (CAA).***
2. Information of the insurance qualification; a. present CMD of the NIACL
academic qualification; salary roll number ; Atul sahai:- event No.22
last known month and gross salary / gross b Ranjit Gangadharan:- event no.24 GM of NIACL
pension;litigation cost incurred in writ petition
of the following officers of NIACL:- c Salary Roll No. 26019 NIACL employee promoted ignoring
history of bribe taking
3. Information of the retrospective month and year of As per attached event no. 3; 5; 26
promotion of the NIACL employee with salary roll
number 26019
4. Information of the duly certified copy of the NIACL Electronic reply as per attached
reply issued by Ranjit Gangadharan; GM of the NIACL Page no.8
to Ministry of Finance, DFS /President of India

RTI Applicant, ShriGopal Soni, ( 9414982395) C-231,PanchSheel Nagar, Ajmer-305 004. <revribhav@gmail.com>
RTI Fee Rs. 10/- is being paid online attachment:- annexure page no. 2 to 8

1
Annexure from ShriGopal Soni,C-231, Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004
apex decision maker’s of India’s
PSU non-life insurance
1. Mr. A V Girija Kumar ,CMD, The Oriental Insurance
<cmd@orientalinsurance.co.in> Company Ltd {OICL}
2. Ms.Tajinder Mukherjee ; CMD,
<cmd@nic.co.in>,
3. Mr. Atul Sahai ;CMD ,
<cmd.sectt@newindia.co.in>
4. Mr.Girish Radhakrishnan ;
<cmd@uiic.co.in>,
5. Mrs. Alice G Vaidyan;
<cmd@gicofindia.com>
6. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Secretary;
rajeevkumar@nic.in
7. (GIPSA),
harish.gipsa@gmail.com
Events experienced by applicant, a whistle blower with no criminal antecedent:-
1 24/02/1988
2 31.10.1991OICL
3.## “effective
punishment of
corrupt through
traps”
No.3(v)/99/10
January 2003
4 29.09.2003
Corporation/association ; Address
regulator as per the
General Insurance Act
Oriental House, A-25/27 ,
Asaf Ali Road,New Delhi -
110 002.
National Insurance Company 3, Middleton Street
Limited {NICL} Kolkata -700 071.
The New India Assurance 87, M.G Road, Fort,
Company Ltd; **{NIACL} Mumbai-400 001.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd 24, Whites Road,
{UIICL} Chennai - 600 014.
General Insurance Suraksha, 170, J Tata
Corporation Of India {GICRe} Road, Churchgate,
Mumbai – 400 020
Department of Financial 3rd floor JeevanDeep
Services; Building, Sansad Marg,
{DFS}, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi-- 01
General Insurers Public Sector Ground Floor, 5, Jeevan Tara
Association {an association of Building, Sansad Marg, NEW
above no.1,2,3,4 and 5} DELHI-110001.
Applicant is appointed as Hindi Translator in a PSU
Insurance company; the minimum qualification required
is that of second class graduate, a class-1 officer’s
minimum qualification was graduate in LIC/GIC
directions that If a Hindi Translator seeks transfer as
Asstt. he should be asked to forego additional
increments..
N Vittal the then Chief Vigilance
Commissioner (authority equivalent to High court )
issues time bound directions for ensuring disciplinary
action against alleged corrupt ; irrespective of criminal
proceedings. Copy is communicated to apex decision
makers of PSU bank / insurance
Reported that an employees of NIACL
( salary roll no.26019 **) trapped bribe extortion in
consideration of cheque release from the insured near
Jaipur (Rajasthan); the anti corruption law enforcement
catches him red-handed, forensic evidence that his
trouser’s pocket ,his hands turned red with gratification.
Applicant is discriminated in promotion
while junior persons ,e.g. salary roll no.24449
2
 promoted in the NIACL {New India Assurance Co. Ltd},
where the slogan is “follow the leader”
5 7.12.2005 Kamlesh Vasisht,
the then in-charge of NIACL regional Office Jaipur
communicates to law enforcement authority S R No.
26019 doubtful integrity officer’s misconduct that his act
of bribe taking is established.
She expresses her intent to remove the alleged bribe
taker from the services of NIACL
6 30.07.2007 Competent court of
law grants stay orders upon transfer orders issued to
applicant dated 5/6/2007 . A Hindi Translator is
addressed as assistant for the sake of transfer.
S. B. Civil writ petition no. 4575/2007 seeking equitable
promotion of applicant.
7 30.08.2007 NIACL RTI reply: A Non
Matriculate employee cannot be promoted to the post
of Hindi Translator. {however, can be promoted as an
assistant }
8-a 24.09.2007 NIACL replies that the balance of leave in
applicant’s account cannot be supplied as leave for
21/06/2007 to 31/7/2007 is pending in Jaipur
8-b 26.3.2008 One Harichand,
{misogynist on behalf of NIACL is pleased to

deposition write:-“It is surprising fact that

the wife of Mr. Soni is not
against wife of
following the Hindu Family
applicant}
Traditions as she is comfortable
away from her sick husband..”
{Salary No. 20676 is soon to be
rewarded as Dy Gen Manager}
9-a April 2008 Suspension order issued by name of applicant ,1975
rules; altering his designation to assistant, no grave
charge except so called violation of discipline of leaving
headquarter{February 2008}.
No.
29/4/2008 CVC Office Memorandum :- cognizance
CONF/1463/08-
9639 on the complaint against isolation forced against the

3
 applicant, CVC directs NIACL to ensure no
harassment to the applicant
9-b 14/11/2008 LIC to applicant:- Our
disciplinary process*,being based upon Principles of
natural justice, the enquiry/investigation officer without
prior intimation to charge sheeted employee (CSE)
cannot include deposition of any fresh witness than that
of pre-declared.
9-c 10/12 Central Information Commission

/2008 records defence of NIACL respondents F. No. CIC/ AT

/ A/2008 /00535 :- “Appellant’s purpose is only to cause
harassment and loss to the public authority. He cannot be
allowed to carry on his activities.”
10 February 09 Rules of discipline are altered

11/02/09 from retrospective effect. Bribe taking is reported at

Jaipur NIACL, CBI entraps one B.K. Gupta; however, no
one put to suspension. RTI reply on behalf of NIACL:-
“applicant has expressed his opinion about state of
corruption in its confirmation asked information about
third party, hence denied”. ethics is that even CBI
cannot deny information of corrupt employees
11 2008-09 In the garb of domestic enquiry,
Investigation officer NIACL directs “written brief” from
one Harichand, it is deposed in the said brief that
applicant left headquarters to get stay orders.
12 12.02.2009 LIC informs: there is no provision of
such”brief” from a witness. (during domestic enquiry)
13 8.06.2009 LIC informs :
The disciplinary authority is required to submit
complete enquiry/investigation report before taking a
decision in the matter of charged employee.
14 14.05.2009 RTI to CVC reveals applicant
that his complaint was sent for necessary action to CVO,
NIACL on 29/4/2008
15 27.06.2009 It (RTI of applicant) is a crude attempt
to confuse the different authorities & an attempt to
escape from the due process of law, observes one A R
Sekar, GM, NIACL

4
16 30.09.2009 No provision of taking cognizance on the basis of
joint representation of insurance employees. LIC RTI
reply. “There is no provision of delivery of
5.10.2009
communication to the delinquent employee at his home
by the messenger. “ RTI reply of NICL
17 19.05.2010 Applicant’s RTI to
apex court that egregious corruption has eroded public
confidence, fwd by Add. Registrar to NIACL
18.a 3.01.2011
NIACL, a corporate person challenges the Govt order
Appeal No. not to supply information in terms of RTI Act, gets
CIC/LS/A/2010/001130- favourable order from Central Information Commission
pertaining to income computation with
DS
IT/TDS Challan,etc. of 4 persons required from Income
Tax Department{CBDT} CIC records: “Appellant
stated that they were
themselves public authority”

18.b 30/05/2011 Dept. of Official Language,Ministry of Home

(MHA) takes cognizance of Applicant’s complaint
10.5.2011 about protection to corrupt officials NIACL,
forwards to DFS.
NIACL chairman’s order sets aside
19.a
June 2011 the disciplinary penalties of 11/2009 ; yet ignores the
principles of natural justice ,inter alia, the directions of
CVC as per event no. 8; 10 to 16

19.b July 28, 2011 The applicant receives e-mail from NIACL DGM in
response to the whistle blowing entitled Re:
Fw: How corrupt officials are well paid with
name change in NIACL
“If you are so engrossed in fighting corruption etc why don't you
devote full time for the same besides using Law qualification for
practicing as a lawyer instead of trying to continue to be in service
whcih has certain limitations as you will be governed by CDA rules
etc which may not allow some of the activities” .
20 10.08.2011 Applicant’s RTI 13/6/11
forwarded by PMO : Delhi NIACL negative reply :
“Information sought by the applicant is nearly 23 years
old…”
21 15.09.2011 “Only when the competent authority is not available in
the R.O. matter is referred to HO.” DGM, RTI OICL
informs
22 12.10.2011 Petitioner-applicant is otherwise employee of
respondent insurance company, Rajasthan High Court

5
 interim order in S. B. (c) Writ Petition No. 14838/10
Mr. Atul Sahai, Chief Manager ,
informs there is NO existence of Hindi Translator in the
19/12/2011
NIACL {he is presently the CMD, NIACL}
Chief Vigilance Officer, NIACL replies
January 2009 the CVC memorandum , she insists 3 times that Mr.
Soni is Hindi Translator
23.a 9.01.2012 {12-2011 DFS letter to Chairman NIACL ignored on

to 1-2012} applicant’s complaint of denial in promotion :-“denial of

fundamental rights”... doubtful integrity employee
26019 participates by virtue of his non suspension .
23.b
01/10/2012 Doubtful integrity employee no. 26019 NIACL gets favourable
order of disclosure of Information from Central Information
Commission{CIC} in respect of marks obtained by 3 successful
candidates in written examination for promotion.
Appeal No. CIC/SD/A/2012/000536
24 30/07/2014 applicant’s RTI 29/09/2010 Ranjit
Appeal No. CIC/DS/A/ Gangadharan, Manager NIACL,a PSU Insurance Public authority
2012/002361 gets stay order from Bombay High Court to obstruct the Right to
Information of applicant in respect of CIC decision 20 May 2013
to disclose information to applicant; He gets lavish tour of
Rs.22710/-for in-person appearance at Delhi on 20/5/2013
though his presence was required by video conference

Reserve Bank of India, the financial regulator’s Chief Vigilance

26.12.2014 Officer {cvo@rbi.org.in} forwards applicant’s concerns , entitled:-
GIPSA company’s tactics of Writ Petition to protect the corrupt
abuse of…

25
6/01/2017 Case No. CIC/MP/2016/000371 Date of decision 30 Januray 2017
CIC record the NIACL Jaipur respondent’s oral submission:- …
they further stated that the appellant was a terminated
employee of NIACL and had filed 100 RTI applications.
The appellant stated that he was proud of his record of making RTI
applications. (applicant’s reply)

26 a fully disciplined
NIACL,S.R. No. 26019
was seen in company
of most powerful
A.R.Sekar as on
20/07/2012; November ,2018 General Insurers Public Sector Association
December 2018 {GIPSA}an unregistered apex body frames scheme of immunity
NIACL eventually for decision makers of PSU non-life insurance Co.s
promotes euphemistically called : “legal and financial support to
S.R. No. 26019 serving/retired employees/officers .. against legal cases arising
out of bona fide execution of Company’s work”.

The scheme benefits the workplace psychopaths and their

promoting managers who somehow get rewarded in our PSU
Insurance.

6
 PRSEC/R/2019/51277
President of India’s Office, 13/12/2019
Rashtrapati Bhavan,
New Delhi (India)

Re:-seeking information in terms of the RTI (Right to information)Act,2005

The applicant seeks the following information of duly certified/original documents:-

1. Duly certified copy of the reply given to PRESEC/E/2019/22962

your office on behalf of NIACL.

as on 12/12/2019 the applicant got the text

message :-your grievance with registration
no…has been disposed of.
2. GIPSA resolution effectively legitimizes Relevant circular of the
inequalities and corruption in our public resolution and it’s
life. Event. No.26 page no.6 confirmation in each of
Information of the approval by the board of the 4 insurers to
directors of each of the 4 GIPSA companies comply with GIPSA
a) NICL b) NIACL c) OICL d)UIICL resolution.

3. Disclosure of the senior most NIACL alleged bribe taker was

departmental authority’s name designation actually seen in the
and working e-mail address according company of most
approval of promotion of doubtful powerful A. R. Sekar as
integrity mainstream employee salary roll per Event. No.26 page
no. 26019 including comments no.6
The RTI fee is being paid online.

Regards,

ShriGopal Soni, C-231, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer-305004

Cell no. 9414982395 @revribhav

Text of grievance of the applicant dated 26/11/2019 the constitution day:-

Re:- my concerns about #PSU insurance corruption in the name of pure

discretion
Today we the citizen’s of India are reminded of the constitution day that envisages rule of law and
equality to each and every citizen of the largest democracy.
Your excellency is the appointing authority of apex decision makers of our PSU Insurance, I bring to your
kind attention the events that reveal psychopath decision makers in our PSU insurance with obsession to
harass & destroy the applicant whistle blower in the name of pure (i.e. absolute) discretion.

7
 Annexure RTI Shri Gopal Soni Page No. 8

Respected Sir,

For your kind perusal, we give below the important details pertaining to the dismissed employee (Sh. Gopal
Soni).

1.He joined as Hindi Translator at the then Ajmer Branch on 24.02.1988.

2.As per H.O. letter No.Corp.HRM/Cl.III/IV Cell:SS:2006 dated 24.03.2006 re-categorisation of various sub
cadres in the Supervisory, Clerical Cadre “Assistant Typist, Telephone Operator, Telex Operator, Receptionist,
Punch Card Operator, Unit Record Machine Operator, Comptist and other equivalent post” were recategorised
as Assistant. As such, Mr.Shri Gopal Soni was also re-categorised as Assistant.
3.As disciplinary proceedings were contemplated against Mr.Shri Gopal Soni, Assistant (Translator), the
competent authority placed him under suspension vide Office Order dated 10.04.2008, which was
acknowledged by him on 11.04.2008.
4.Memorandum dated 2.5.2008 conveying Article of Charges against Mr.Soni was issued by the Competent
Authority. As Mr.Soni did not submit any reply to the Memorandum, a domestic enquiry was instituted
against him.
5.Enquiry Officer after conclusion of ex-parte inquiry proceedings submitted his Enquiry Report dated 8.6.2009
with the findings that all charges stands proved.
6.The Manager & Disciplinary Authority vide Office Order dated 5.11.2009 imposed upon him the major
penalty of reduction of his basic salary by six stages in his time scale permanently and also mentioned that
Mr.Soni who was palced under suspension vide Office Order dated 10.04.2008 will continue to remain under
suspension till the final decision in the Memorandum dated 13.02.2008 served upon him is taken.
7.Memorandum dated 13.02.2008 conveying Articles of Charges against Mr.Soni was issued by the Competent
Authority. As he denied all the charges a domestic inquiry was instituted against him. After conclusion of
enquiry proceedings the E.O. submitted his report dated 06.03.2009 with the findings that all the charges
stands proved. The Manager & Disciplinary Authority vide Office Order dated 16.11.2009 imposed upon him
the Major Penalty of ‘Dismissal’ from the services of the Company with immediate effect and also passed
order that Mr.Soni, who was placed under suspsension vide office order dated 10.04.2008 that his suspension
period was justified and confirmed.
9.Chief Regional Manager & Appellate Authority vide Orders dated 10.05.2010 and 17.05.2010, after overall
consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, did not find any ground for re-consideration of the
penalety imposed and accordingly rejected the Appeal dated 01.12.2009 of Mr.Soni and upheld the Orders
dated 05.11.2009 and 16.11.2009 of the Disciplinary Authority.
10.Chairman cum Managing Director vide order dated 09.06.2011 admitted the Memorial dated 25.05.2010
submitted by Mr.Shri Gopal Soni and set aside the Orders dated 05.11.2009 and 16.11.2009 passed by the
Appellate Authorities and imposed upon him the modified penalty as applicable in both the Charge Sheets
issued to Mr.Soni to that of ‘reduction in basic salary bytwo stages in the time scale as applicable as on the
date of first penalty order i.e. 511.2009 and also directed that the intervening period i.e. from the date of
dismissal till Mr.Soni reports for duty, shall be treated as period not spent on duty and hence on Loss of Pay
and he will not be entitled for any back wages. Further, under the said Order Mr.Soni was transferred to
Ahmedabad R.O.
11.Mr.Soni did not comply with the above order of C.M.D. and did not report for duties at Ahmeadabad
R.O. Hence, his status as on date is dismissed employee.