PRSEC/R/E/20/00187 Online RTI 16/02/2020

President of India Secretariat

New Delhi- 110001 { India}

Kind attention:- Nodal Officer for Right To Information

Issue:- alarming inequalities of promoting doubtful integrity officers and abuse

of public money in our PSU Insurance/PSU banks.
Re:- Seeking information in terms of Right to information Act,2005

1. Information required From 2008

The applicant seeks yearly amount of
public money spent by each PSU bank/
insurance company for providing
insurance coverage to key management
personnel against legal actions
2. The applicant seeks the name ; salary roll
no. designation ;last gross salary of PSU
bank insurance company executives with
insurance coverage of key management
personnel against legal actions
3. In the event the insurance coverage of
key management personnel against legal
actions is partly borne by the key
management personnel the applicant
seeks information of the proportion borne
by the employer PSU bank/insurance .

Regards, ShriGopal Soni, <revribhav@gmail.com> ( 9414982395)

C-231,PanchSheel Nagar, Ajmer-305 004.

RTI Fee Rs. 10/- is being paid online

attachment:- annexure page no. 2 to 7

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

The apex decision makers of India’s non-life Public sector Insurance co.s {called
GIPSA} approved scheme during October 2018 that the public Fund & public
resources shall be utilized for protection of the employees, e.g. directors and/ or
their family members against whom the law enforcement agencies of India have
registered case(s) of corruption/ abuse/ crime .

(Details as per the event no.26}

Immediately thereafter a PSU insurance employee {salary roll no. 26019, NIACL}
is promoted with increments from retrospective effect.

1
Annexure from ShriGopal Soni,C-231, Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004
apex decision maker’s of India’s
PSU non-life insurance
1. Mr. A V Girija Kumar ,CMD, The Oriental Insurance
<cmd@orientalinsurance.co.in> Company Ltd {OICL}
2. Ms.Tajinder Mukherjee ; CMD,
<cmd@nic.co.in>,
3. Mr. Atul Sahai ;CMD ,
<cmd.sectt@newindia.co.in>
4. Mr.Girish Radhakrishnan ;
<cmd@uiic.co.in>,
5. Mrs. Alice G Vaidyan;
<cmd@gicofindia.com>
6. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Secretary;
rajeevkumar@nic.in
7. (GIPSA),
harish.gipsa@gmail.com
Events experienced by applicant, a whistle blower with no criminal antecedent:-
1 24/02/1988
2 31.10.1991OICL
3.## “effective
punishment of
corrupt through
traps”
No.3(v)/99/10
January 2003
4 29.09.2003
Corporation/association ; Address
regulator as per the
General Insurance Act
Oriental House, A-25/27 ,
Asaf Ali Road,New Delhi -
110 002.
National Insurance Company 3, Middleton Street
Limited {NICL} Kolkata -700 071.
The New India Assurance 87, M.G Road, Fort,
Company Ltd; **{NIACL} Mumbai-400 001.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd 24, Whites Road,
{UIICL} Chennai - 600 014.
General Insurance Suraksha, 170, J Tata
Corporation Of India {GICRe} Road, Churchgate,
Mumbai – 400 020
Department of Financial 3rd floor JeevanDeep
Services; Building, Sansad Marg,
{DFS}, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi-- 01
General Insurers Public Sector Ground Floor, 5, Jeevan Tara
Association {an association of Building, Sansad Marg, NEW
above no.1,2,3,4 and 5} DELHI-110001.
Applicant is appointed as Hindi Translator in a PSU
Insurance company; the minimum qualification required
is that of second class graduate, a class-1 officer’s
minimum qualification was graduate in LIC/GIC
directions that If a Hindi Translator seeks transfer as
Asstt. he should be asked to forego additional
increments..
N Vittal the then Chief Vigilance
Commissioner (authority equivalent to High court )
issues time bound directions for ensuring disciplinary
action against alleged corrupt ; irrespective of criminal
proceedings. Copy is communicated to apex decision
makers of PSU bank / insurance
Reported that an employees of NIACL
( salary roll no.26019 **) trapped bribe extortion in
consideration of cheque release from the insured near
Jaipur (Rajasthan); the anti corruption law enforcement
catches him red-handed, forensic evidence that his
trouser’s pocket ,his hands turned red with gratification.
Applicant is discriminated in promotion
while junior persons ,e.g. salary roll no.24449
2
 promoted in the NIACL {New India Assurance Co. Ltd},
where the slogan is “follow the leader”
5 7.12.2005 Kamlesh Vasisht,
the then in-charge of NIACL regional Office Jaipur
communicates to law enforcement authority S R No.
26019 doubtful integrity officer’s misconduct that his act
of bribe taking is established.
She expresses her intent to remove the alleged bribe
taker from the services of NIACL
6 30.07.2007 Competent court of
law grants stay orders upon transfer orders issued to
applicant dated 5/6/2007 . A Hindi Translator is
addressed as assistant for the sake of transfer.
S. B. Civil writ petition no. 4575/2007 seeking equitable
promotion of applicant.
7 30.08.2007 NIACL RTI reply: A Non
Matriculate employee cannot be promoted to the post
of Hindi Translator. {however, can be promoted as an
assistant }
8-a 24.09.2007 NIACL replies that the balance of leave in
applicant’s account cannot be supplied as leave for
21/06/2007 to 31/7/2007 is pending in Jaipur
8-b 26.3.2008 One Harichand,
{misogynist on behalf of NIACL is pleased to

deposition write:-“It is surprising fact that

the wife of Mr. Soni is not
against wife of
following the Hindu Family
applicant}
Traditions as she is comfortable
away from her sick husband..”
{Salary No. 20676 is soon to be
rewarded as Dy Gen Manager}
9-a April 2008 Suspension order issued by name of applicant ,1975
rules; altering his designation to assistant, no grave
charge except so called violation of discipline of leaving
headquarter{February 2008}.
No.
29/4/2008 CVC Office Memorandum :- cognizance
CONF/1463/08-
9639 on the complaint against isolation forced against the

3
 applicant, CVC directs NIACL to ensure no
harassment to the applicant
9-b 14/11/2008 LIC to applicant:- Our
disciplinary process*,being based upon Principles of
natural justice, the enquiry/investigation officer without
prior intimation to charge sheeted employee (CSE)
cannot include deposition of any fresh witness than that
of pre-declared.
9-c 10/12 Central Information Commission

/2008 records defence of NIACL respondents F. No. CIC/ AT

/ A/2008 /00535 :- “Appellant’s purpose is only to cause
harassment and loss to the public authority. He cannot be
allowed to carry on his activities.”
10 February 09 Rules of discipline are altered

11/02/09 from retrospective effect. Bribe taking is reported at

Jaipur NIACL, CBI entraps one B.K. Gupta; however, no
one put to suspension. RTI reply on behalf of NIACL:-
“applicant has expressed his opinion about state of
corruption in its confirmation asked information about
third party, hence denied”. ethics is that even CBI
cannot deny information of corrupt employees
11 2008-09 In the garb of domestic enquiry,
Investigation officer NIACL directs “written brief” from
one Harichand, it is deposed in the said brief that
applicant left headquarters to get stay orders.
12 12.02.2009 LIC informs: there is no provision of
such”brief” from a witness. (during domestic enquiry)
13 8.06.2009 LIC informs :
The disciplinary authority is required to submit
complete enquiry/investigation report before taking a
decision in the matter of charged employee.
14 14.05.2009 RTI to CVC reveals applicant
that his complaint was sent for necessary action to CVO,
NIACL on 29/4/2008
15 27.06.2009 It (RTI of applicant) is a crude attempt
to confuse the different authorities & an attempt to
escape from the due process of law, observes one A R
Sekar, GM, NIACL

4
16 30.09.2009 No provision of taking cognizance on the basis of
joint representation of insurance employees. LIC RTI
reply. “There is no provision of delivery of
5.10.2009
communication to the delinquent employee at his home
by the messenger. “ RTI reply of NICL
17 19.05.2010 Applicant’s RTI to
apex court that egregious corruption has eroded public
confidence, fwd by Add. Registrar to NIACL
18.a 3.01.2011
NIACL, a corporate person challenges the Govt order
Appeal No. not to supply information in terms of RTI Act, gets
CIC/LS/A/2010/001130- favourable order from Central Information Commission
pertaining to income computation with
DS
IT/TDS Challan,etc. of 4 persons required from Income
Tax Department{CBDT} CIC records: “Appellant
stated that they were
themselves public authority”

18.b 30/05/2011 Dept. of Official Language,Ministry of Home

(MHA) takes cognizance of Applicant’s complaint
10.5.2011 about protection to corrupt officials NIACL,
forwards to DFS.
NIACL chairman’s order sets aside
19.a
June 2011 the disciplinary penalties of 11/2009 ; yet ignores the
principles of natural justice ,inter alia, the directions of
CVC as per event no. 8; 10 to 16

19.b July 28, 2011 The applicant receives e-mail from NIACL DGM in
response to the whistle blowing entitled Re:
Fw: How corrupt officials are well paid with
name change in NIACL
“If you are so engrossed in fighting corruption etc why don't you
devote full time for the same besides using Law qualification for
practicing as a lawyer instead of trying to continue to be in service
whcih has certain limitations as you will be governed by CDA rules
etc which may not allow some of the activities” .
20 10.08.2011 Applicant’s RTI 13/6/11
forwarded by PMO : Delhi NIACL negative reply :
“Information sought by the applicant is nearly 23 years
old…”
21 15.09.2011 “Only when the competent authority is not available in
the R.O. matter is referred to HO.” DGM, RTI OICL
informs
22 12.10.2011 Petitioner-applicant is otherwise employee of
respondent insurance company, Rajasthan High Court

5
 interim order in S. B. (c) Writ Petition No. 14838/10
Mr. Atul Sahai, Chief Manager ,
informs there is NO existence of Hindi Translator in the
19/12/2011
NIACL {he is presently the CMD, NIACL}
Chief Vigilance Officer, NIACL replies
January 2009 the CVC memorandum , she insists 3 times that Mr.
Soni is Hindi Translator
23.a 9.01.2012 {12-2011 DFS letter to Chairman NIACL ignored on

to 1-2012} applicant’s complaint of denial in promotion :-“denial of

fundamental rights”... doubtful integrity employee
26019 participates by virtue of his non suspension .
23.b
01/10/2012 Doubtful integrity employee no. 26019 NIACL gets favourable
order of disclosure of Information from Central Information
Commission{CIC} in respect of marks obtained by 3 successful
candidates in written examination for promotion.
Appeal No. CIC/SD/A/2012/000536
24 30/07/2014 applicant’s RTI 29/09/2010 Renjit
Appeal No. CIC/DS/A/ Gangadharan, Manager NIACL,a PSU Insurance Public authority
2012/002361 gets stay order from Bombay High Court to obstruct the Right to
Information of applicant in respect of CIC decision 20 May 2013
to disclose information to applicant; He gets lavish tour of
Rs.22710/-for in-person appearance at Delhi on 20/5/2013
though his presence was required by video conference

Reserve Bank of India, the financial regulator’s Chief Vigilance

26.12.2014 Officer {cvo@rbi.org.in} forwards applicant’s concerns , entitled:-
GIPSA company’s tactics of Writ Petition to protect the corrupt
abuse of…

25
6/01/2017 Case No. CIC/MP/2016/000371 Date of decision 30 Januray 2017
CIC record the NIACL Jaipur respondent’s oral submission:- …
they further stated that the appellant was a terminated
employee of NIACL and had filed 100 RTI applications.
The appellant stated that he was proud of his record of making RTI
applications. (applicant’s reply)

26 a fully disciplined
NIACL,S.R. No. 26019
was seen in company
of most powerful
A.R.Sekar as on
20/07/2012; November ,2018 General Insurers Public Sector Association
December 2018 {GIPSA}an unregistered apex body frames scheme of immunity
NIACL eventually for decision makers of PSU non-life insurance Co.s
promotes euphemistically called : “legal and financial support to
S.R. No. 26019 serving/retired employees/officers .. against legal cases arising
out of bona fide execution of Company’s work”.

The scheme benefits the workplace psychopaths and their

promoting managers who somehow get rewarded in our PSU
Insurance.

6
 Rajasthan state Human Rights Commission

Order

Complaint No. 2019/17/1668 Date 24.04.2019

Single Bench

Before:- Hon’ble Member Justice Sh. Mahesh Chand Sharma

This complaint is communicated by Shri Gopal Soni to this commission. In which

the petitioner files complaint against discrepencies in the promotions in the
public sector insurance company and states that psychopaths too get promoted
in the said entities whereas the senior officer’s remain denied .

We carefully perused the facts pointed out by the petitioner, Prima facie a photo copy of the
complaint is communicated to District Collector, Jaipur we expect that action will be taken as
per the law and the information thereof shall be communicated to the complainant.

The complaint is being disposed at the Commission. The Complainant be informed with liberty
to take such action as deemed necessary as per the law in the matter.

(Justice Mahesh Chand Sharma)

Member <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

jktLFkku jkT; ekuo vf/kdkj vk;¨x] t;iqj

vknsf‘kdk
ifjokn lU[;k 2019/17/1668 fnukUd 24.04.2019

,dy ihB
le{k %& ekuuh; lnL; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egs‘k pUæ ‘kekZ
;g ifjokn Jhx¨iky l¨uh }kjk bl vk;¨x d¨ Ásf“kr fd;k x;k gS- ftles ÁkFkÊ us
ifCyd lsDVj bU‘;¨jsUl es gqà xMcfM;¨ d¢ f[kykQ ifjokn fn;k gS rFkk dgk gS fd bl
lULFkk es eu¨j¨xh Hkh in¨Uufr ÁkIr dj ysrs gS- tcfd bud¢ ofj“B vf/kdkjh blls
ofUpr jg tkrs gS-
geus ifjoknh }kjk ÁLrqr rF;¨ dk /;kuiwodZ voy¨du fd;k- ÁFke –“V~;k ifjokn dh
Nk;k Áfr ftyk dysDVj ]t;iqj d¨ Ásf“kr dj muls vis{kk djrs gS fd os fof/k dh
visf{kr vis{kkv¨ d¨ /;ku es j[krs gq, Ádj.k es fof/k vuqlkj vko‘;d dk;Zokgh djsUxs
rFkk ifjoknh d¨ bldh lwpuk nsUxs- …