Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering

A SWOT analysis of reliability centered maintenance framework

Gajanand Gupta Rajesh P Mishra
Article information:
To cite this document:
Gajanand Gupta Rajesh P Mishra , (2016),"A SWOT analysis of reliability centered maintenance
framework", Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 22 Iss 2 pp. 130 - 145
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JQME-01-2015-0002
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

Downloaded on: 22 April 2016, At: 02:33 (PT)

References: this document contains references to 38 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 58 times since 2016*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(2016),"Optimal maintenance level of equipment with multiple components", Journal of Quality in
Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 22 Iss 2 pp. 180-187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JQME-07-2014-0043
(2016),"Representation of replacement rules in the form of a matrix", Journal of Quality in
Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 22 Iss 2 pp. 164-179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JQME-06-2015-0022
(2012),"Meta-SWOT: introducing a new strategic planning tool", Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 33
Iss 2 pp. 12-21 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756661211206708

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-
srm:487998 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald
for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission
guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as
well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and
services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for
digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

 The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1355-2511.htm

JQME
22,2
A SWOT analysis of reliability
centered maintenance framework
Gajanand Gupta and Rajesh P. Mishra
130 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and
Sciences, Pilani, India
Received 19 January 2015
Revised 11 June 2015
8 September 2015
Abstract
13 October 2015 Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to use well-established methodology strengths, weaknesses,
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

Accepted 22 January 2016
opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis – in order to identify the important factors for reliability
centered maintenance (RCM) implementation.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper demonstrates a SWOT analysis for different 19
frameworks of RCM to make a strategic decision for implementing RCM in different organizations. The
various 19 frameworks are grouped together into three clusters, namely Group A, Group B and Group
C based on their qualitative or theoretical, quantitative and practical approach, respectively.
Findings – The strengths and weaknesses are identified by internal factors while the opportunities
and threats are identified by external factors of an organization for each group of frameworks. Also, it
was observed that each group of frameworks has a unique set of strengths and weaknesses.
Research limitations/implications – In this paper, the SWOT analysis for RCM implementation is
limited to the comparison of various 19 RCM frameworks which are available in literatures and based
on internal or external factors of an organization.
Practical implications – The SWOT analysis also suggests that the implementation of RCM is not
an easy task for any practitioner and one should weigh in all the opportunities and threats before
arriving at any strategic decision.
Originality/value – A unique approach applied to analysis the frameworks of RCM. The SWOT
analysis of various RCM frameworks will help the practitioner to take any strategic decision for RCM
implementation in an organization.
Keywords Reliability centered maintenance, SWOT analysis, Decision making framework
Paper type Research paper

Abbreviations
RCM reliability centered maintenance RM radical maintenance
SWOT strengths, weaknesses, FMEA failure mode and effect analysis
opportunities and threats PM preventive maintenance
FMECA failure mode effect and criticality FFA functional failure analysis
analysis FFMEA function, Failure mode and
FSI functionally significant item effect analysis
IRCMA intelligent reliability centered MSI maintenance significant
maintenance items

1. Introduction
Along with the increasing expansion of technology and competition among industries,
organizations employ different strategies and policies to increase productivity and
Journal of Quality in Maintenance
Engineering decrease costs. Maintenance is a policy which is used in production industries to decrease
Vol. 22 No. 2, 2016
pp. 130-145
costs, increase productivity and to continue with the global competition. A lot of
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1355-2511
maintenance strategies have been developed during last few years. RCM has been one of
DOI 10.1108/JQME-01-2015-0002 the most recent strategies in maintenance around the world. RCM originated in the airline
 industry in the 1960s as a systematic process for development and optimization A SWOT
of the maintenance requirements of a physical resource in its operating context analysis of
to realize its inherent reliability by logically incorporating the maintenance strategies
like reactive, preventive, condition based and proactive maintenance. Around the
RCM
world, it is an imperative technology in the industry maintenance field that framework
can be functional to improve the equipment availability and reliability and reduce
operational and maintenance costs. The theory of RCM is the function of the 131
operating system to recognize the consequences of the failure by the failure analysis and
system function.
Since RCM implementation is a strategic decision and assumes that managers
tend to utilize a framework for implementation, they cannot afford to make a mistake
in selecting a suitable framework. The authors are left with a problem of how to
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

choose one particular framework from the list of frameworks. Hence, in this paper, an
effort has been made to overcome the above problem. The paper is structured as
follows: Section 2 describes a brief literature review of RCM and strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis, Section 3 presents the
elements of RCM frameworks, Section 4 enumerates the comparison of elements of
RCM frameworks followed by the used methodology and conclusion of paper in
Sections 5 and 6, respectively.

2. Literature review
2.1 Reliability centered maintenance
Many authors have made attempts for development of RCM concept since 1960.
Nowlan and Heap (1978) first introduce the RCM concept in 1978 as it refers to a
scheduled-maintenance program designed to recognize the inherent reliability
capabilities of equipment. Richet et al. (1995) applied the fundamental principles of
RCM to 15 foundries which were very distinct in terms of type, size, level of technology
and geographical location. Nour et al. (1998) emphasized the importance of careful
analysis of the reliability of machine components in order to optimize the maintenance
program. Pujadas and Chen (1996) formulated a specialized maintenance decision
support system that combines the merits of RCM and FMECA. Goodfellow (2000)
analyzed the opportunities for the application of RCM techniques to overhead electric
utility distribution systems. Reder and Flaten (2000) introduced the application of RCM
techniques for underground distribution systems. Al-Ghamdi et al. (2000) presented the
concepts and implementation steps for RCM and improved an existing time-based
maintenance program at a local plant in Saudi Arabia. Fonseca and Knapp (2000)
developed a new framework for RCM implementation in the chemical process industry.
Penrose (2005) applied RCM techniques on electric motors. Dehghanian and Aminifar
(2013) proposed a method to adopt the principles of RCM in power distribution systems
in the form of a practical RCM framework. Cheng et al. (2008) proposed a framework for
intelligent RCM analysis. Gang and Michael (2009) presented condition-based
maintenance framework integrated with reliability centered maintenance. Li and
Gao (2010) proposed the concepts and analysis of RCM by considering radical
maintenance in a petrochemical industry. Fore and Mudavanhu (2011) developed a
framework for implementation of an RCM approach in a chipping and sawing mill.
Chen and Zhang (2012a, b) described the implementation of reliability centered
maintenance in China’s nuclear energy field. Liang et al. (2012a, b) applied the concepts
of RCM to evaluate the reciprocating compressor. Literature review shows that RCM
includes all historical records such as the list of FSI, FMECA information (Cheng et al.,
 JQME 2008) and achievements of RCM applications on the overhead lines (Goodfellow, 2000),
22,2 underground systems (Reder and Flaten, 2000), chemical industry (Fonseca and Knapp,
2000) and processed oil and gas industry (Guevara and Souza, 2008).

2.2 SWOT analysis

SWOT is a straight forward framework that indicates the significance of external and
132 internal forces for the reason of understanding the sources of competitive advantage. SWOT
is a logical approach on which every organization should assess its external and internal
environments to adopt its strategy (Ghazinoory et al., 2011). SWOT helps to make a decision
whether the problems faced by an organization rotate around a need to improve strategy,
a need to get better strategy implementation, or both. SWOT analysis can generally help to
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

represent a strategic organizational situation and to recognize what information is needed

and what decisions are likely to be made at a personal as well as organization level
(Balamuralikrishna and Dugger, 1995). This tool helps in recognizing the organization’s
current performance (strengths and weaknesses) and the organization’s future (opportunities
and threats) by accounting for the factors that exist in the external background.
Ghazinoory et al. (2011) published a review paper on SWOT analysis. He has been
found a significant work in literatures (more than 550 research papers) for making
strategic decision using SWOT analysis in many areas like manufacturing, transportation,
IT, construction, electronic, oil and gas industries, etc. Many authors published a SWOT
analysis for the frameworks of total productive maintenance, world class maintenance and
lean implementation for making a strategic decision (Mishra et al., 2007, 2008), Mishra and
Chakraborty (2014). The advocates of SWOT, strengths refer to intrinsic abilities to
compete and grow strong. Weaknesses are the intrinsic deficiencies that cripple growth
and survival. Opportunities are the better chances and prologues existing for growth.
Threats are externally wielded challenges, which might contain inherent strengths,
accelerate weakness and stifle opportunities from being exploded.

3. Elements of RCM frameworks

This section represents the elements and their sequence in various existing RCM
frameworks in literatures. The repeatable and consistent methodology is one of the
most important requirements for the success of RCM implementation. Literature review
shows that there is a lack of structured implementation procedure for RCM and a
structured implementation process can be one of the success factors for the RCM
program in an organization. The structured implementation process is usually
represented in the form of a particular framework and a framework can act as a guide
and it provides a structured way to achieve its objectives. Some of the existing
frameworks were proposed by academicians, while most of them were proposed by
practitioners or consultants who have developed these frameworks based on their
practical experience with different organizations. But the frameworks which are given
by practitioners or consultants are also qualitative in nature, while only a few
frameworks are available based on the quantitative analysis of reliability. In all these
frameworks, the principal activities of RCM are organized as elements. The elements of
the various frameworks available in literatures are shown in Table I.

4. Comparison of elements of RCM frameworks

About 19 frameworks of RCM have been studied. Among these frameworks, only few
frameworks are unique, while most of them are more or less similar. Only the naming
 1. Nowlan and Heap (1978)
A SWOT
1. Partitioning equipments into object categories analysis of
2. Identify significant items RCM
3. Evaluating maintenance requirement for each significant item
4. Identifying items for which no applicable and effective task can be found framework
5. Selecting maintenance intervals for each equipment
6. Establish an age exploration program
2. Srikrishna et al. (1996) 133
1. Selection of critical auxiliaries
2. Data collection
3. Selection of significant maintenance items
4. The maintenance decision process
5. Selection of maintenance periodicity
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

3. Rausand (1998)
1. Study preparation
2. System selection and definition
3. Functional failure analysis (FFA)
4. Critical item selection
5. Data collection and analysis
6. Failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA)
7. Selection of maintenance actions
8. Determination of maintenance intervals
9. Preventive maintenance comparison analysis
10. Treatment of non-critical items
11. Implementation
12. In-service data collection and updating
4. Deshpande and Modak (2002)
1. System selection and information collection
2. System boundary definition
3. System description and functional block diagram
4. System functions and functions failures
5. Failure mode and effect analysis
6. Logic tree analysis
7. Tasks selection
5. Gabbar et al. (2003)
1. Asset assessment
2. Assess failure
3. Decide maintenance strategy
4. Decide maintenance tasks
5. Optimize maintenance tasks
6. Check and validate
6. Smith et al. (2003)
1. System selection and Information Collection
2. System Boundary Definition
3. System Description and Functional Block Diagram
4. System Functions and functional failure
5. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)
6. Logic Tree Analysis
7. Task Selection
7. Penrose (2005)
1. Set boundaries and create a functional block diagram with partitioning of the system under review
2. Determine functional failures
3. Determine functionally significant items of the system Table I.
The elements of
various frameworks
(continued ) of RCM
 JQME 4. Perform a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
22,2 5. Perform a logic tree analysis in order to determine the effectiveness of maintenance tasks for the
FMEA
6. Determine servicing and lubrication tasks
7. Set maintenance requirements for the system
8. Draft and evaluate maintenance procedures
9. Determine tasks for inactive equipment and, Develop corrective maintenance processes,
134 procedures and specifications
8. Cheng and Jia (2005)
1. Identification of functionally significant items
2. Retrieval of structure tree of FSI of the similar equipment from equipment case base
3. FMEA
4. RCM logic decision analysis
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

5. Combining PM tasks to form a RCM program

9. Yu and Zhao (2005)
1. Preliminary classification if equipment
2. Historical maintenance database
3. Function, failure mode and effect analysis (FFMEA)
4. Identification of maintenance items and modes
5. Formulation of maintenance program
6. Implementation of maintenance program
7. Evaluation of maintenance results
10. Bertling et al. (2005)
1. Define Reliability model and required input data
2. Identify critical components by reliability analysis
3. Identify failure cause by failure mode analysis
4. Define a failure rate model
5. Model effect of Preventive maintenance (PM) methods on reliability for each failure cause
6. Deduce different plans for applying PM and evaluate the resulting effect on the component
failure rate
7. Define and implement different strategies for PM
8. Estimate the resulting composite failure rate
9. Compare system reliability when applying different maintenance methods and PM strategies
10. Identify cost effective PM strategy
11. Niu and Pecht (2009)
1. Objection identification
2. Determine ways of function failures
3. Determine failures models
4. Assessing the effects of failure
5. Identification of maintenance tasks
6. Identification of maintenance interval
7. Program evaluation & cost analysis
12. Singh et al. (2010)
1. Study preparation
2. System selection and definition
3. Functional failure analysis
4. Critical item selection
5. Data collection and analysis
6. FMECA
7. Selection of maintenance actions
8. Determination of maintenance intervals
9. Preventive maintenance comparison analysis
10. Implementation

Table I. (continued )
 13. Kianfar and Kianfar (2010)
A SWOT
1. System selection and information collection analysis of
2. System boundary definition RCM
3. System descriptions and functional block diagram
4. System functions and functional failures framework
5. Failure modes and effect analysis
6. Ranking of failure modes
7. Task selection 135
8. Implementation
14. Selvik and Aven (2011)
1. Identification of Maintenance significant items (MSI)
2. PM task assessments
3. PM interval assessments
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

4. Packing of PM tasks
5. Uncertainty analysis
6. Uncertainty evaluation & presentation of results
7. Managerial review and judgment
8. Preventive maintenance program
15. Chen and Zhang (2012a, b)
1. Boundary definition
2. Function analysis
3. Function failure & effect analysis
4. Identification of the critical equipment
5. Critical equipment failures and strategies application
6. PM evaluation of the non-critical equipment
7. Comparison analysis of maintenance tasks
8. Maintenance tasks list
16. Liang et al. (2012a, b)
1. System division and Identification of FSI
2. FMEA of FSI
3. Criticality analysis or Risk analysis or identify the level of FSI
4. RCM logic, making maintenance strategy
17. Dehghanian et al. (2013)
1. system boundary identification
2. Critical component identification
3. Failure mode determination of critical components
4. Critical failure mode recognition
5. Failure cause specification of critical failure modes
6. Failure rate modelling of critical components
7. Load point/system reliability evaluation
8. Outlining possible maintenance strategies
18. Prabhakar and Raj (2013)
1. Reliability audits and analysis
2. Identifying Likely failure modes
3. FMECA on critical equipment
4. Feedback and measurement
19. Yssaad et al. (2014)
1. Define the system-identify levels of indenture
2. Define ground rules and assumptions
3. Construction equipment tree
4. FMECA
5. Assign maintenance focus levels based on criticality
6. Apply RCM decision logic
7. Identify maintenance tasks
8. Make recommendations and package final maintenance program
9. Feedback – continuous re-evaluation and improvement Table I.
 JQME and the sequence of elements are different. Based on the definition of each element
22,2 which is defined by their respective authors in respective framework, similar elements
compared and clubbed in Table II, which is shows a matrix of numbers, which
represents the order of each element (given row-wise), as mentioned in the
corresponding frameworks (given column-wise). The order of each element
represents the sequence of that element in the respective framework.
136
5. Methodology
Since implementation of RCM program is a strategic decision, it is necessary that
managers/practitioners of different organizations should identify a suitable framework
and they cannot afford to make a mistake in the selection process. But a greater hurdle
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

in this selection process is the availability of large number of frameworks in the

literature. Hence a strategic tool – the SWOT analysis was chosen for analyzing these
frameworks and grouped together into three clusters, namely Group A, Group B and
Group C, based on their qualitative or theoretical, quantitative and practical approach,
respectively. Grouping of various frameworks of RCM is shown in Table III. This study
can be used to assess the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each RCM
framework, it can provide adequate support for the manager/practitioners in making a
better decision of implementing a suitable RCM framework.
According to Ghazinoory et al. (2011) SWOT analysis can be categorized as follows:
• the first category deals with problems in implementation of new technologies
within organizations that can be solved by organizing SWOT panel effectively; and
• the second category deals with integrating SWOT with other decision-making
techniques.
In this paper, the first category of SWOT analysis has been adapted as follows to
analyze the RCM frameworks:
• Strength: if any RCM framework has a unique element/feature when compared to
others, then it is considered as the strength for that framework.
• Weakness: if the common elements of RCM that were identified in comparative
analysis are missing in a framework, then it is considered as the weakness for
that framework.
• Opportunity: in a RCM framework, if an element, which may not be an important
element for RCM implementation or if it is not directly related to RCM, but if
incorporated can provide significant competitive advantage to the organization,
then it is considered to be opportunity for other frameworks.
• Threat: if an element in the framework, which may not be an important element
for RCM implementation, but if it is not present/implemented can spoil the entire
implementation, then it is considered as a threat.
Based on these concepts of SWOT analysis, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities
and threats for different frameworks of RCM were identified. Since the frameworks
having common elements, may have same strengths, weaknesses, opportunities
and threats, it was considered logically to perform a SWOT analysis on a group.
SWOT analysis has been performed for each of the groups mentioned in Table III.
The SWOT analyses for Group A, Group B and Group C are discusses in the
following sections.
 A SWOT
analysis of
RCM
framework

137
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

Table II.
Comparison of
elements of various
RCM frameworks
(continued )
 Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

22,2

138
JQME

Table II.
(continued )
 Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

framework
RCM
analysis of
A SWOT

Table II.
139
 JQME Groups Authors/consultants Remarks
22,2
Group A Nowlan and Heap (1978), Rausand (1998), Smith and Theoretical or qualitative
Hinchcliffe (2004), Cheng (2005), Niu and Pecht RCM approach
(2009), Singh et al. (2010), Kianfar and Kianfar (2010),
Selvik and Aven (2011), Prabhakar and Raj (2013)
Group B Yu and Zhao (2005), Bertling et al. (2005), Quantitative RCM approach
140 Dehghanian and Aminifar (2013), Yssaad et al. (2014)
Group C Srikrishna et al. (1996), Deshpande and Modak Practically applied
Table III. (2002), Gabbar et al. (2003), Penrose (2005), Chen and frameworks in various
Grouping of RCM Zhang (2012a, b), Liang et al. (2012a, b) industries like small scale,
frameworks nuclear and power plant, etc.
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

5.1 SWOT analysis of Group A frameworks

Group A consists of following nine frameworks, namely, Nowlan and Heap (1978),
Rausand (1998), Smith and Hinchcliffe (2004), Cheng (2005), Niu and Pecht (2009), Singh
et al. (2010), Kianfar and Kianfar (2010), Selvik and Aven (2011), Prabhakar and Raj
(2013). The SWOT analysis of Group A frameworks is shown in Table IV.

5.2 SWOT analysis for Group B frameworks

These frameworks are based on purely quantitative reliability and failure analysis and
developed by Yu and Zhao (2005), Bertling et al. (2005), Dehghanian and Aminifar (2013),
Yssaad et al. (2014). Apart from quantitative analysis other elements are more or less similar
to Group A frameworks. The SWOT analysis of Group B frameworks is shown in Table V.

5.3 SWOT analysis for Group C frameworks

These frameworks are based on their practical application in different industries and
developed by Srikrishna et al. (1996), Deshpande and Modak (2002), Gabbar et al. (2003),
Penrose (2005), Chen and Zhang (2012a, b), Liang et al. (2012a, b). In these frameworks
basically Qualitative analysis is used, so these frameworks are more or less similar to
Group A frameworks. The SWOT analysis of Group C frameworks is shown in Table VI.

6. Conclusion
This paper presents a SWOT analysis of various RCM frameworks which exist in
literature and extensively used by industries around the globe. An extensive study of
19 RCM frameworks has been done to identify the key steps involved in each of these
frameworks. The study of RCM frameworks revealed that the approaches followed by
different frameworks can be utilized to categorize them into three different groups –
Group A, B and C. Group A frameworks involved qualitative RCM approaches, Group
B frameworks were based on a quantitative approach and Group C frameworks
employed practical approaches which are majorly used in small scale industries,
nuclear power plants, etc. A comparative study was done for these groups involving
different RCM frameworks on the basis of the SWOT analysis of each group. The
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for each of these groups have been
successfully identified and presented in the paper. The findings of each group
frameworks as follows:
• Group A: these frameworks can be used for planning the preventive maintenance
based on continuous improvement. These frameworks provide a proper way to
 Strengths
Widely accepted framework
Systematic analysis for planning the preventive
maintenance of technical systems
Supports adaptive and dynamic maintenance
strategy
Provides way to select the appropriate maintenance
strategy
Team-based improvement process
Maintenance expenses are planned and controlled
Continuous improvement
Establish documented improvement methods
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)
Weakness
A SWOT
Limited assessments of risk and uncertainties analysis of
Lack of quantitative reliability analysis RCM
Strategies are only rudimentary
Strategies are made on an ad hoc basis
framework
A process where PMs are only widely
carried out 141
Lack of understanding of RCM concepts by top
management
Lack of in-house training facilities
Contradiction of management activities
Long time required for implementation

Increases the reliability of system by failure analysis Resistance to daily discipline

Critical items are dealt with a higher priority for
maintenance action
Maintenance tasks are directed toward failure and
functional degradation
Reduces maintenance costs due to elimination of
unnecessary maintenance actions
Long-term process for data collection and
failure analysis
How to relate RCM process to cost reduction
Poor structure to support the RCM teams and
their activities
The challenge of passion

Opportunities Threats
RCM process can be directly link to design phase of Resistance from employees
equipment Management may not be easily convinced
Needs to integrate RCM with other continuous Savings potential not easily seen by
improvement programs management
Reduces maintenance tasks for equipments or machines Need of highly skilled maintenance personnel
Development of innovative designs for maintenance required for implementation
prevention Availability of system failure data
Improves safety and reduces accidents
Reduces the investment on new equipments as present
equipment will be more reliable
Changes the attitude of the employees toward
continuous improvement
Helps maintenance personnel to become multi-skilled
Optimize the maintenance procedures of bottleneck
operations Table IV.
Reduces item/equipment replacement SWOT analysis of
Builds teamwork and cooperation among employees Group A frameworks

select the appropriate maintenance strategy to reduce the maintenance costs.

These frameworks can be used to plan and control the maintenance expenses,
however the lack of knowledge of quantitative reliability analysis is the major
drawback for proper understanding of RCM concepts.
• Group B: based on logical and structured reliability analysis Group B
frameworks provides the quantitative relationship between system reliability
and maintenance effort however these are very complex, time consuming and
requires a lot of substantial input data.
• Group C: these frameworks are used in practice in various industries and are
based on qualitative failure analysis and computer aided RCM however these
frameworks are also having the lacks of quantitative reliability analysis similar
to Group A.
 JQME Strengths
22,2 Quantitative relationship between system
reliability and maintenance effort
Straight forward algorithm for implementation
of RCM
Logical and structured reliability analysis
142 Failure rate modeling
Reduces unexpected breakdowns
Economic analysis of maintenance tasks
Use of standardized components for reliability
analysis
Established for preventive maintenance tasks
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)
Weaknesses
Substantial input data required to support the
method
Need of significant updates of relevant databases
Limited to power distribution industry
Implementation needs expertise
Complex and time consuming algorithm
Other weaknesses are more or less similar to Group
A

Other strengths are more or less similar to

Group A
Opportunities Threats
Feedback systems can produce better results Reliability outcomes after such a complex analysis
Can be applied in other industries after Need of highly skilled maintenance personnel for
simplification of algorithm reliability analysis
Can be established for other maintenance Inefficiency in updating of database can cause the
Table V. strategies also variation/disastrous the results
SWOT analysis of Other opportunities are more or less similar to Other threats are more or less similar to Group A
Group B frameworks Group A

Strengths Weaknesses
Practically use of qualitative failure analysis Lack of quantitative reliability analysis
in various industries Focussed on practical use of RCM approach to
Use of computer aided RCM individual equipments rather than entire system
Other strengths are more or less similar to Practical use of RCM approach limited to nuclear
Group A plant, power plant or power distribution industries
Other weaknesses are more or less similar to Group A
Opportunities Threats
Quantitative analysis approach can also be Threats are more or less similar to Group A
used for the same equipment or industry
Can be utilize for manufacturing or process
Table VI. industries also
SWOT analysis of Other opportunities are more or less similar to
Group C frameworks Group A

The knowledge of strengths and weaknesses of different RCM strategy presented in

the paper can help industry specialists to make a choice among different approaches
based on the requirements of the industry and resources available.

References
Al-Ghamdi, A.S., Duffuaa, S.O. and Raouf, A. (2000), “Reliability centered maintenance concepts
and applications: a case study”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 7,
pp. 123-132.
Balamuralikrishna, R. and Dugger, J. (1995), “SWOT analysis: a management tool for initiating new
programs in vocational schools”, Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, Vol. 12
No. 1, pp. 1-7.
 Bertling, L., Allan, R. and Eriksson, R. (2005), “A reliability-centered asset maintenance method A SWOT
for assessing the impact of maintenance in power distribution systems”, IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 75-82.
analysis of
Chen, Y. and Zhang, T. (2012a), “Application & development of reliability-centered maintenance
RCM
(RCM) in China’s nuclear energy field”, International Conference on Quality, Reliability, framework
Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering, pp. 543-548.
Chen, Y. and Zhang, T. (2012b), “Application and development of reliability centered 143
maintenance (RCM) in China’s nuclear energy field”, IEEE, Vol. 12, pp. 543-548.
Cheng, Z. (2005), “An intelligent reliability centered maintenance analysis system based on case-
based reasoning & rule-based reasoning”, IEEE, Vol. 5, pp. 545-549.
Cheng, Z.H., Jia, X. and Gao, S.P. (2008), “A framework for intelligent reliability centered
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

maintenance analysis”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 93 No. 6, pp. 784-792.
Dehghanian, P. and Aminifar, F. (2013), “A comprehensive scheme for reliability centered
maintenance in power distribution systems – Part I: methodology”, IEEE Transactions on
Power Delivery, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 761-770.
Deshpande, V. and Modak, J. (2002), “Application of RCM to a medium scale industry”, Reliability
Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 77 No. 1, pp. 31-43.
Fonseca, D.J. and Knapp, G.M. (2000), “An expert system for reliability centered maintenance in
the chemical industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 45-57.
Fore, S. and Mudavanhu, T. (2011), “Application of RCM for a chipping and sawing mill”, Journal
of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 204-226.
Gabbar, H.A., Yamashita, H., Suzuki, K. and Shimada, Y. (2003), “Computer-aided RCM-based
plant maintenance management system”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 449-458.
Gang, N. and Michael, P. (2009), “A framework for cost-effective and accurate maintenance
combining CBM, RCM and data fusion”, IEEE, Vol. 9, pp. 605-611.
Ghazinoory, S., Abdi, M. and Mehr, M. (2011), “SWOT methodology: a state-of-the-art review for
the past, a framework for the future”, Journal of Business Economics and Management,
Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 24-48.
Goodfellow, J.W. (2000), “Applying reliability centered maintenance to overhead electric utility
distribution systems”, Proceeding of IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Summer Meeting, Vol. 1, pp. 566-569.
Guevara, F.J.C. and Souza, G.F.M. (2008), “RCM application for availability improvement of gas
turbines used in combined cycle power stations”, IEEE Latin America Transaction, Vol. 6
No. 5, pp. 401-407.
Kianfar, A. and Kianfar, F. (2010), “Plant function deployment via RCM and QFD”, Journal of
Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 354-366.
Li, D. and Gao, J. (2010), “Study and application of reliability-centered maintenance considering
radical maintenance”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 23 No. 5,
pp. 622-629.
Liang, W., Lianfang, P., Zhang, L. and Hu, J. (2012a), “Reliability-centered maintenance study on
key parts of reciprocating compressor”, IEEE, pp. 414-448.
Liang, W., Pang, L., Zhang, L. and Hu, J. (2012b), “Reliability-centered maintenance study on key
parts of reciprocating compressor”, International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk,
Maintenance, and Safety Engineering, pp. 414-418.
Mishra, R.P. and Chakraborty (2014), “Strenghts, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis
of lean implementation frameworks”, International Journal of Lean Enterprise Research,
Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 162-182.
 JQME Mishra, R.P., Anand, G. and Kodali, R. (2007), “Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
analysis for frameworks of world-class maintenance”, Proceedings of the Institution of
22,2 Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 221 No. 7,
pp. 1193-1208.
Mishra, R.P., Anand, G. and Kodali, R. (2008), “A SWOT analysis of total productive maintenance
frameworks”, International Journal of Management Practice, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 51-81.
144 Niu, G. and Pecht, M. (2009), “A framework for cost-effective and accurate maintenance
combining CBM RCM and data Fusion”, IEEE, Vol. 9, pp. 605-611.
Nour, G.A., Beaudoin, H., Ouellet, P., Rochette, R. and Lambert, S. (1998), “A reliability based
maintenance policy: a case study”, Computers Industrial Engineering, Vol. 35 No. 3,
pp. 591-594.
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

Nowlan, F.S. and Heap, H.F. (1978), “Reliability-centered maintenance”, National Technical
Information Service, US Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA.
Penrose, H.W. (2005), “RCM-based motor management”, Electrical Insulation Conference and
Electrical Manufacturing Expo, Vol. 5, pp. 187-190.
Prabhakar, D. and Raj, V.P. (2013), “A new model for reliability centered maintenance in
petroleum refineries”, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, Vol. 2
No. 5, pp. 56-64.
Pujadas, W. and Chen, F.F. (1996), “A reliability centered maintenance strategy for a discrete part
manufacturing facility”, Computers Industrial Engineering, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 241-244.
Rausand, M. (1998), “Reliability centered maintenance”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety,
Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 121-132.
Reder, W. and Flaten, D. (2000), “Reliability centered maintenance for distribution underground
systems”, Proceeding of IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Summer Meeting, Vol. 1, pp. 551-556.
Richet, D., Cotaina, N., Gabriel, M. and Reilly, K. (1995), “Application of reliability centered
maintenance in the foundry sector”, Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 3 No. 7,
pp. 1029-1034.
Selvik, J.T. and Aven, T. (2011), “A framework for reliability and risk centered maintenance”,
Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 96 No. 2, pp. 324-331.
Singh, M., Sachdeva, A., Bhardwaj, A., Gupta, R. and Singh, S. (2010), “An introduction to total
productive maintenance and reliability centered maintenance”, National Conference on
Advancements and Futuristic Trends in Mechanical and Materials Engineering, February
19-20, pp. 252-255.
Smith, A. and Hinchcliffe, G. (2004), RCM: Gateway to World Class Maintenance, Butterworth-
Heinemann, Oxford.
Srikrishna, S., Yadava, G.S. and Rao, P.N. (1996), “Reliability centered maintenance applied to
power plant auxiliaries”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 1,
pp. 3-14.
Yssaad, B., Khiat, M. and Chaker, A. (2014), “Reliability centered maintenance optimization for
power distribution systems”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems,
Vol. 55, pp. 108-115.
Yu, J. and Zhao, H. (2005), “Maintenance plan based on RCM”, 2005 IEEE Transmission &
Distribution Conference & Exposition: Asia and Pacific, pp. 1-4.

About the authors

Gajanand Gupta is working as a Lecturer and pursuing his PhD in the Mechanical Engineering
Department of Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani. He earned his Degree of Masters of
Technology (MTech), specializing in production engineering from the NIT Rourkela in May 2011
 after completing his BTech in Mechanical Engineering from ECK Kota, in June 2009. His research A SWOT
interests are in the areas of reliability engineering and maintenance management. Gajanand Gupta
is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: gajanandgupta1222@gmail.com
analysis of
Professor Rajesh P. Mishra started his professional career as a Lecturer in Mechanical RCM
Engineering Department at BITS, Pilani, which he joined in June 2005 after gaining his PhD from framework
same institute. Presently he is serving as an Assistant Professor Mechanical Engineering
Department. He has published number of papers in international journals and has participated in
a number of conferences, presenting technical papers. He is currently guiding one PhD. His 145
research interests are in the areas of reliability engineering, manufacturing management,
maintenance management.
Downloaded by Birla Institute of Technology & Science At 02:33 22 April 2016 (PT)

For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com