Professional Documents
Culture Documents
;: ~::',
ASTM D429 81 8:' 0759510 0533440 944 8
Ao",int8d
SOOElY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
'916 Roco Sl Philodolphi..
trem tho An,
Pa 19103
,1 Book of ASThI Stand8ld.. Copyright AS"IM
II not liallad In tho C\8'1'ont combined IndOJ<, wll appear In the no>li edition.
r..
Standard Test Methods for
1
Rubber Property-Adhesion to Rigid Substrates
This sandard is issued under the fi.ed designation D 429; the number immediately following the designatio
i- original adoption or. in the case of ~vision, the yeM of last revision. A number in pa~nth= indica~ the year 0
supencnpt epsilon (.) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or ~pprovaL
.
ThiJ Jtandard has bHrl approvi!d fOl' Wt by agtnc;i!.1 of tht Dtpartmrnt of Di![t!nst. Consulr thi! DoD Indtx of Sp«ifications and'
r- Standards for tht sfJ«Ific yt'ar of issut which has Mi!n adopttd by thi! Di!parrmtnJ of Di!ftnse.
I l .
Current edition approved Nov. 27, 1981. Published April 1982. Originally
published as 0 429
Z Annual Book of ASTM
I AnnfJ41 Book of ASTM
- 35 T. last previous
Standards.
Standards.
edition
Yol 03.02.
Yo109.01.
0 429 - 73.
,
Annual
Book ofASTM
. Annual
Book of ASTM
1 Annual
Book of."STM
Standards.
Standards.
Standards.
Yol 09.02.
Yol 03.01.
Yol 14.02. This practice is also in the 1978
. AMfJ41 Book of ASTM Standards. Yols 09.01 and 09.02. SAE Handbook.
r
j\:
:opyright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
I'htct 02 15:44:20 2003
~~J~~
DONYA WASHER
~rr1 ,1»:\';'"
~~~ . .. -------_. ,~~; \teNY\~0 6
..-,--
ASTM »42~ 81.. 075~510 0533441 880 ~
41 D 429
~
.~
::.'
...
l.
-~O<, ~ ,
- --"--"""...0; ' "
-,' ..
.'\'..
-"..-'"
.-~.
S. Adhesion Failure Terminology device to give the total force at the conclusion of the test. A
5.1 R indicates the failure is in the rubber. machine of not more than 40 kN (IO 000 lbf) capacity will
5.2 RC indicates the failure is at the rubber-cover cement be found suitable in most cases.
interface. 6.2 Grips-The fixtures for holding the specimen in the
5.3 CP indicates the failure is at the cover cement-prime testing machine will depend on the type of specimen but in
cement interface. all cases shall be provided with ball seats to permit proper
5.4 M indicates the failure is at the metal-prime cement centering of the load during the test. A typical adhesion test
interface. assembly is shown in Fig. I. Specially molded laboratory
NOTE 1: Example- The percentages of the various types of failure specimens shall be attached by means of threaded studs on
may be estimated as in the fOllowing examples: the metal parts as shown in Fig. 2, but with specimens cut
R-50, RC-50 means that roughly one half or 50 % of the area showed from production parts the clamp illustrated in Fig. 3 may be
failure in the rubber and the other 50 % showed failure at the rubber used.
cover cement interface.
R-25, RC-25, M-50 means three types offailure were present with the
M indicating 50 % failure at the metal.primer interface. 7. Standard Test Specimens
6. Apparatus 7.1 The standard test specimen shall consist of a cylinder
of rubber 3.2 ~ 0.1 mm (0.125 ~ 0.005 in.) and an end area
6.1 Testing Machine-A tension testing machine con- of 1250 ~ 5 mm2 or 2.00 ~ 0.01 in.2 (diameter of39.9 ~ 0.1
forming to the requirements of Practices E 4 shall be used for mm (1.597 ~ 0.005 in.)) attached to the faces of two metal
measuring the strength of adhesion. The moving head of the plates each at least 9.5 mm (0.37 in.) in thickness and of the
machine shall travel at the rate of 0.40 ~ 0.04 mmls (1.0 ~ same diameter as the rubber cylinder. The metal plates shall
. . 0.1 in./min). The machine shall be provided with a recording
.~:;: have smooth flat faces that shall be parallel in the finished
".'.
'.",".
FIG. 2 Vlewa of . Typical Teat SpecImen Showing Individual Metal Parts and Rubber Cylinders
2
:~~',
:;~~
":~:
pyright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
u '."ct 02 15:44:20 2003
C
be
~~,
:~~
_:-;.-
ASTM »429 ~1 ~ 0759510 0533442 717 ..
4~ D 429
3
,.."',
~;,:
~~
!..
~
~'
~' .."i.
.':J{~~i~}~~:",~;'~~~~~.~
.,'t
I
-_'\: -~'~-...
;t,- ,
,
.
(:~'.
:."~'t '-~
r no:'
.-,:.:.
TI
I I
.
:;; -MocJrine Sleel
1.' HaltStfJrPins-
. 1
---
- 0 '- -'
I
r
jUIt:1nT. I f I , rOllr 81Mitrs to flash (;-oows
J~ "
,,;' "'" I: ""
,.;.a-
,I II :t: ""',v ;1',
- --.',
":\
r 1
I
- -tI /', --""
.~ //'
\ \
,-""
~ ~\ I~" I \\ ~-
ti-*-'
\
\
H-1-.
I
~
I
1/,8
~
~/ .
ritam.llo/t'S
.
I I -, \,J
I':" """":""
,.;A \~,
;", ~ /.~'",Ir-
~
:
.J
--- Flosh 6roows ~rad.
.1 c\: ,> -' ',,~ -[, ','11\0 .
co 1 ",-:-"" ,\ \ - Q438"~O.OOI" Machine
~f
\D
I -;',/I /' -~'\",'.
n I' .--T-J.r
_.J \ \ '~'~.IJ.+. 'i - I ~.,,""'i I I .=..-
. I 1.600"tiOm. !O.CKJI" I 5 moo.t h
J..,.--r~.
/
/
I I'f~ "f' ~I I.-- ~=..L~1 ~J-
',k-: 1 -rnJ , J" ~
I \ ',\':'::: ' '::'".../J-:"- '~1-
I
I r-L...,I~
4\
Q375"~QfX2';'~ .!:!
0 -- -t - 0"
:
I
1
~
'1..
, "'
I i" --- --.T-
~
I I 1
1
1<;"
II
.flosItGmNr.
~. +
I
- I
0 TI4' '""'!""
'l61~
li .
:
~
/1 I[J; f
1.597 ".'tIH1m.'" -*- j"x20
",'
-.:.; .. ..L -;:f-- -;:f'--- J
Mold
LIr- - ~ j
J
If-
d).oor . TI1rerxIs
S.A.E.No.1020 St~r
M~al T~t Piece
In. I'IYI1
'I.. 2
'10 3
'V,. 5
'Va 10
'12 13
% 16
'V. 19
1'12 38
2'1. 54
2'1. 57
2"/, 73
3 76
6'12 165
8 203
0.375 :t: 0.002 . 9.53 :t: 0.05
0.'25 :t: 0.005 3.2 :t: 0.1
1.597 :t: 0.001 15.16:t: 0.03
1.600 :t: 0.001 40.64 :t: 0.03
greater than the strength of the rubber itself. Record the type
or types of failure, and express in accordance with the surface that separates. In case of rupture of the rubber, the
adhesion failure terminology described in Section 5. Esti- adhesion value is recognized as being higher than that
mate and record the percentages of the various types of reported.
failures. 12. Report
~...'
~.:--: 12.1 The report shaJI include the following, preferably
:;~ 11. Calculation
Il.l Express the adhesion value in pascals or pounds- reported on an Adhesion Test Data Sheet as illustrated in
force per square inch and calculate by dividing the tension Table I:
"::;:; /2.1.1 The result calculated in accordance with Section
force causing failure by the onginaJ area of the adhered
II,
TABLE 1 Example of Form fM Reporting Adhe8lon test Results
Pull Type at BnIeIc.
SIock CIn Mec8 and Metal
FmIing Used s.npIe, A-.ge. "
Ibf/In. tJI(rn. R RC CP ",
D8I8
By
4
....
,.,'.
.:.:.
::~
~:
'Yright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
:~ct 02 1S:44:202003
I,'
'~r'
:.L
!i\.,_:~:t~~:
gf'~~1: ?;;.~ ~~;,~ .>., ;,' ~~~,
_
'~~~,~,?t,i~t~.~.
~. .. . '...
, ,.'..
<-:~~-
~.. ..
~." ASTM D429 81 "0759510 0533444 591..
4~ D 429
12.1.2 All observed and recorded data including the
(to-,' number of test pieces involved.
12.1.3 Notation of type or types of failure and the
estimated percentages of the various types of failures (Section I
-
an
..
I I
I
10), 'it
d' ,...
:
"
r'
12.1.4 A description of the specimen including a state-
ment of the test method used for securing adhesion, if
I
I
.. :
t I
I
t
molded in the labor:atory or prepared fr~_m a produ~Uon ~L- .-,
I
part,,
- ~~"
f: 12.1.5 Dimensions of the test specimen (comparisons
may be made only among specimens of the same size and
~:
: f I
I'
shape). f
12.1.6 Date of manufacture or vulcanization, if known,
12.1.7 Time and temperature of vulcanization, if known.
12.1.8 Temperature of test room, and
12.1.9 Date of test.
:::J
". ."
-'2;0.
r' ".} \.
. ;.,
I.l~'
!84
~_.-
'
J
. -- . -
.""
13.i- Within laboratory testing and testing among labora- I
tories has been started to generate data for the precision
statement. FIG. 5 Adhesion Tensile Testing Fixture in Operation
:\1ETHOD 8-90. STRJPPIl'iG TEST-RUBBER R-SO, RC-SO means that roughly one half or SO % of the area showed
PART ASSEMBLED TO Ol'iE METAL PLATE failure in the rubber and the other 50 % showed failure at the
rubber-cover cement interface.
14. Significance and Use R-2S. RC-2S. M-SO means that three types of failure are present with
the M indicating SO % failure at the metal-primer interface.
14.1 This test is intended for determining the adhesive
strength of rubber-to-metal bonding agents. The results are
obtained by measuring the force necessary to separate a 16. Apparatus
rubber from a metal surface. The data obtained indicate the 16.1 Testing Machine-A testing machine as described in
strength of adhesion along a line across the width of the 6.1 of Test Methods D 412 shall be used for measuring the
rubber strip being separated from a metal plate at a 90. angle. strength of adhesion. The head of the machine shall travel at
The test provides valuable data for development and control the uniform rate of 0.83 :t 0.08 mmls (2 :t 0.2 in./min).
of rubber compounds and test methods of bonding, and it 16.2 Fixture-Any suitable fixture for holding the test
also serves as a screening test for the evaluation of various specimen to the upper head of the machine may be used
bonding agents or techniques, or both. provided the direction of pull to cause separation shall be, at
NOTE3-11 is permissible to use a 45. angle to bring about all times during the test, as nearly perpendicular as possible.
separation, but if this is done. the same should be indicated on t~e form that is, making a 90. angle with the top holding fixture. The
on which the data are recorded. If this notation does not appear, It must test fixture shown in operation in Fig. 5 complies with the
be assumed that the 90. angle has been used. The angle of pull, in this above and provides the ease and simplicity of testing.9
case 45., merely ml:ans that the equipment has been so designed that the
angle made by that face of the rubber being stripped from the metal and 16.3 Grips-Any suitable grip may be used. provided it
the metal to which it has been adhered is 45.. Experience indicates a does not slip or rupture the rubber strip. The grip shown in
lower force is obtained for the 4S. angle than for the 90. angle. and also Fig. 5 complies and provides ease and simplicity of opera-
:.:.: a break significantly closer to the bond interface. tion.
. Supportinc
DII-IO4O.
dau are available from ASTM Headquarten. Request RR:
9 Complete detail drawings of the fixture are available at a nomina! cost from
ASTM. 1916 Race SI.. Philadelphia. PA 19103. Request AdjunC1 No. 12-
4042~.
~}
..::f.'
)pyright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
IU Oct 02 15:44:20 2003
r~'.'
it;"
i', .~
t ";
~ij~
1,':"
.r 4t D 429
f
8. , t,
A
L Masked
Areos
approximately in the middle of the metal member as shown moisture, or other foreign material.
in Fig. 6. 18.1.4 Vulcanize by heating the mold under pressure for a
NOTE5-ln = where the 1,6-mm(O,062-in.)thick metal is definite time at a controlled temperature in a hydraulic
pennanently defonned during testing, a thicker metal may be used when vulcanizing press. The time and temperature of cure shall be
agreed upon between the purchaser and the supplier. in accordance with the system being investigated. At the
conclusion of the cure, take care in removing the specimens
18. Preparation of Standard Test Specimen from the mold to avoid subjecting the adhered surfaces to
18.1 Prepare the standard test specimen as described in stress before the specimens have cooled.
18.1.1 to 18.1.6: 18.1.5 After vulcanization, store the specimens at a tem-
18.1.1 Rectangular metal parts of the standard dimen- perature of 23 :t 2'C (73.4 :t 3.6.F) for at least 16 h.
sions described in Section 17 shall have the area to be 18.1.6 Separate the specimens from each other in prepa-
bonded prepared in accordance with the test method for ration for testing. This is done by cutting with a scissors,
securing adhesion that may be under investigation. Mask handknife, or other suitable equipment The edges of the
both ends with pressure-sensitive tape so that only the area specimen may then be buffed on a belt sander to bring the
described in Section 17 will be available for adhesion. edge of the rubber flush with the edge of the metal strips
18.1.2 Cut un vulcanized rubber slabs approximately 8 (Note 6). Take care not to overheat the metal parts or the
mm (0.3 in.) in thickness to dimensions of the required size rubber and not to reduce the width of the sample being tested
for the mold. so as to provide maximum pressure of the beyond the tolerances described.
.",-.
~.) rubber against the metal surfaces during vulcanization. (See NOTE 6-Prescnt experience indicates negligible diffemlccs io results
Fig. 6 for suitable mold design.) The inside mold dimensions betweeo samples butTed clean and samples tested without buffing.
"
parallel to the longitudinal axis of the metal part shall be 125 possibly due to the facts that edges of metal partS are oat specifically
mm for nominal 5 in. The dimension along the transverse prepared for adhesion and the area 1,5 mm (0.06 in. or less) is not
axis of the metal part can be altered according to the number significant.
of pieces required for anyone cure. This will leave sufficient
length of rubber strip for fastening in the grip shown in Fig. 19. Procedure
5. Solvent-wash rubber surface to be adhered or treat in 19.1 Place the test specimen (Note 7) symmetrically in the,
accordance with the method being investigated. jaws attached to the fixed grip with the separating edge
18.1.3 Assemble the metal parts and rubber pieces for toward the operator, as shown in Fig. 5. Before the load is
vulcanization as shown in Fig. 6, properly spacing the metal applied, strip the rubber from the metal plate for a distance
parts along one edge of the rubber slab and then placing the of approximately 2 mm (0.08 in.) by using a sharp knife
assembly, metal parts down, in the mold cavity. Cure the (Note 8). Place the tab in the grip and apply a steady load at
whole assembly in accordance with the method being inves- the rate of 50 mm (2.0 in.)jmin until separation is complete.
tigated. Prior to assembly and vulcanization, take great care Use the autographic recorder in order to show graphically the
to keep the surfaces to be adhered clean and free of dust, adhesion values over the full length of the test specimen.
6
.::-.
~*
::~:
opyrlght by the American Society For Testing & Materials
...,
"et 02 15:44:20 2003
v'
t
" '
:;} ,
~'
. ~~,
r.,,h,
,
.~.,;.
i-r~'
ASTM ])429lB .' 0759510053344b3b2 -
4t D429
",.
NOTE 7-This specimen lends itself to the aetennination of the 24.2 R indicates failure.in the rubber.
~
'.,.'
relative effect of environmental conditions on possible bond deteriora- 24.3 RC indicates failure in the rubber-cover cement. It
tion. Specimens may be exposed unstressed or under 'a constant. 24.4 CP indicates failure in the cover cement-prime
relatively low bond stress. It is recommended that one of the standard
ASTM environmental exposure conditions be used. Among those
cement.
applicable are the following: Test Methods D 471, D 572. D 573. 24.5 M indicates failure in the prime cement-metal inter-
D 1149, Practice G 23, and Method B 117. If environments other than face.
the above are used. they shall be described completely. This should
. Nar.E 9: Example- The percentages of the various types of failure
I
include the conditions of the exposure such as time. temperature. etc.
may be estimated as in the following examples:
NOTE 8-Stripping the rubber from the plate initially, and as
R-SO, RC-50 means that roughly one half or 50 % of the area showed
"necessary'during the test,"is done to observe more clearly adhesion to the
r failure in the rubber and the other 50 % showed failure at the
I/ substrate rather than the tear strength of the stock. rubbCT-cover cement interface.
R-25. RC-25, M-50 means three types of failure present with the M
20. Calculations indicating 50 % failure at the metal primer interface.
.
20.1 Express the adhesion value in newtons per
millimetre or pounds.force per inch of width. 25. Apparatus
21. Report 25.1 Testing Machine-A tension testing machine con-
fonning to the requirements of Practices E 4 shall be used for
21.1 The report shall include the following, preferably
measuring the strength of adhesion. The moving head of the
reported on an Adhesion Test Data Sheet illustrated in Table
.. machine shall travel at the rate of 0.83 :t 0.08 mmls (2.0 :t
I: ..
0.2 in.fmin). The machine shall be provided with a recording
21.1.1 The results calculated in accordance with Section
device to give the force in newtons or pounds-force at the
20. conclusion of the test. A machine of not more than 40 kN or
21.1.2 All observed and recorded data.
10 000 Ibf capacity will be found suitable in most cases.
21.1.3 Notation of the type or types of failures and the 25.2 Grips-The fixtures for holding the specimen in the
estimated percentages of the various types of failures (Section
15),
test machine will depend on the type of specimen but in all
cases shall be provided with ball seats to pennit proper
21.1.4 Description of the specimen including statement of
centering of the applied load during the test. These grips can
method of securing adhesion, if known,
be of two types: U) a simple slip-in type which engages in the
21.1.5 Date of vulcanization, if known, grooved section of the conical specimen or (2) a threaded
21.1.6 Time and temperature of vulcanization, if known,
stud with a locknut. This could be a combination fixture.
21.1. 7 Temperature of test room, and
21. I. 8 Date of test.
26. Standard Test Specimen
22. Precision and Bias8 26.1 A standard test specimen shall consist of a rubber
22.1 Within laboratory testing and testing among labora- compound bonded to two conical metal end pieces. The
tories has been started to generate data for the precision diameter of the test specimen shall be 25 :t 0.5 mm (1.00 :t
statement. 0.2 in.). The distance between the opposed conical end pieces
shall be 11.5 :t 1.2 mm (0.45 :t 0.05 in.). For the test
METHOD C-MEASURING ADHESION OF specimen in Fig. 7. the height of each conical end piece shall
RUBBER-TO-METAL WJ11{ A CONICAL be 23.4 :t 0.5 mm (0.92 :t 0.02 in.) (Note 10).The half-angle
SPEO:\1EN
of the cone vertex shall be 45 :t 18and the tip shall not be
23. Significance and Use rounded to radius greaterthan 0.8 mm (0.03 in.).
23.1 The test method is designed primarily for application
to test pieces prepared in the laboratory under standard
conditions in order to provide data for development and
control of bonding systems and their components such as
cements, or special rubber compounds, and of test methods E RAD.
of manufacture. While intended to be applied where rubber
.. is bonded to supporting rigid pieces, it may not cover such
cases where the support, while being of high modulus
material, has a low rigidity due to small transverse dimen-
sions, as in the case of rubber bonded to metal wires, cords or
thin sheets. The particular geometry of the test piece
produces, in most cases, an interfacial failure between the mm
Jc n.
rubber and conical part, because of a stress concentration at A 25.0 :t: 0.5 1.00 = 0.02
the tip of the cone. BA 23.5 = 0.5 0.92 :t:0.02
C 11.5 1.2 0.45 = 0.05
0 458 = 1
24. Adhesion Failure Terminology =
E (radius) 0.8 max 0.03max
24.1 Express the type of adhesion failure as detennined by A SuggeS1ed dimension.
examination of broken test pieces by one or more of the
following symbols: FIG. 7 Test Specimens with Conical Adhesion Areas
7
~:'.:
ili~
opyright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
L"'et 0215:44:202003
I
~
t" '~~
-, .
.
r.
L',
G D 429
.'.~.
...'.
u ... ...
8
::-'~:
Jill'
IPy:rightby the American Society For Testing & Materials
u Oct 0215:56:252003
E
f"
,.~:;;
.
I
. ..
~~:'~ AST~D~2~ 51'" 015951D DS33~4a 135..
~~ D 429
30.1.2 Cure timc and tcmperature, duces for testing the strength of adhesion of rubber to metal
30.1.3 Type of mctal or rigid substratc used and surface when the bond is formed during vulcanization. Method D
'.*.' preparation, may be used to determine the strength of adhesion of rubber
30.1.4 Adhesive and dilution, to metal when the bond is formed after the rubber has been
30.1.5 The adhesion value for each test piece, vulcanized. In the rubber industry, this is commonly referred
30.1.6 Type and percentage of failure, to as post-vulcanization (PV) bonding.
30.1.7 Date of vulcanization and date of test, and 33.2 In the test, a vulcanized circular disk that has been
30.1.8 Temperature of test room. adhesive coated on both ends, is assembled between two
parallel metal parts. The rubber-metal assembly is then
31. Precision and Bfas3 placed in a jig under compression and heated in an oven for
31.1 Within laboratory testing and testing among labora- a specified time at a specified temperature.
tories has been started to generate data for the precision 33.3 When tested to rupture in an axial direction, a
statemcnt. measurement of rubber-to-metal adhesion is obtained. The
rupture force and type of failure are recorded.
32. Salvaging of Bonded Metal Parts
32.1 Bonded metal partS may be salvaged by the usual 34. Apparatus
burning or chemical stripping techniques. Mechanical or 34.1 Testing Machine-A tension testing machine con-
chemical surface treatments are used to re-establish a clean forming to the requirements of Practices E 4 shall be used for
bonding surface. The sharpness of the conical tip may be measuring the strength of adhesion. The crosshead of the
:::
reduced during salvaging. This affects reproducibility of the machine shall travel at the nit~ of 0.83 :t 0.08 mmls (2.0 :t
test results and care must' be taken to re-establish the 0.2 in.)/min. The machine shall be provided with a device to
sharpness of this cone to 0.8-mm (0.03-in.) radius (max- record the maximum force at the conclusion of the test. A
imum). machine of at least 40 kN ( 1a aOO-tbf)capacity is suitable.
34.2 Grips-The fixtures for holding the specimen in the
METIJOD D-ADHESION TEST: POsr-vULCANIZATIO~
(PV) BONDI:'oJG OF RUBBER TO METAL testing machine will depend on the type of specimen but in
all cases shall be provided with ball seats to penn it proper
33. Significance and Use centering of the load during the test. These grips can be of
the type described in 5.2 of Method A and illustrated in Figs.
33.1 Methods A, B, and C of this standard cover prace- 1 and 3.
~7S'~
m SrCCI.
5'""",
;~:.
.",.
~
64
Du
'6 Pt.cs
T"""
~ Du THRIJ
Z2S~
dJ jn-
2
64
; :~:~;
2 Pu:3.
in. mm
'12 12.7
33/64 13.10
<41/64 16.27
0.875 22.23
1.250 31.75
1.625 .1.28
2.250 57.15
2.500 63.50
3.250 82.55
<4.50 11<4.30
5.00 127.0
AG. 9 0ut8ide PIat88 (Two Required) L~rt)on Steel
~~
..
)pYiight by the American Society For Testing & Materials
IU Oct 0215:56:25 2003
.
:
L:: :
L'
,,,
.-
:>~
~'~ ,'CA";'
Y
..;.
I~
.
,
~.
---..-.---.
r--;
ASTM D~a' 61 .. 07S'S1C CS33~~' 011 ..~
4t D 429
.eo" ~-j !-
I
I
in. mm
0.150 3.81
0.45 11.40
LI
41{64 16.27
0.875 22.23
1 'I. 31.75
.lz.'j?
~
1.250 31.75
I _.
I
1.50 38.10
10
~...~~
.Ji='
Ipyright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
u Oct 0215:56:25 2003
L'
,.
f"<
tfi
.
r'l' ASTM D429 81 ~ 0759510 0533450 893 ..~
!
"
.;. . ,"
~t D 429
..~
/~
.~ I
I.
..~_.'1 ,.:., ",..;.-.", ",-,,~ .
'.
r
r
i
I ::: ..
PARTS LIST
No.
No. Oescr1ption Req'd
1 0/,-16 LiNC 3-in. long hex bolt 2
2 Fig. 9 - outside plate 2
3 Metal test specimen 12
4 Vulcanized rubber puclc 6
5 Fig. 10 - center aligling plate 1
6 Washer 2
7 51.16 UNC nut 2
39.1,8 Date of test. NOTE II : Example-The percentages of the various types of failure
may be estimated as in the fallowing examples:
40. Precision and BiasB R-50, RC-50 means that roughly one half or SO % of the area showed
40.1 Within laboratory testing and testing among labora- failure in the rubber and the other 50 % showed failure at the
tories has been started to generate data for the precision rubber - cover cement interface.
R-25. RC-25. M-50 means that three types of failure are present with
statement. the M indicating SO % failure at the metal -
primer interface.
II
,.,..
".;..
~t;
'<
pyright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
~ Oct 0215:56:252003
&l
~,
'~;f!::~
~.I
r re:'
ASTM D429 81 .. D75'510 0533451 7eT ...
~t D 429
area end and at a sufficient distance to permit jaws of the
..... testing clamp to be attached. Mount the plate on a support
frame, attach a clamp to the test specimen at separated end.
Suspend a mass carrier to the clamp and apply known
masses to the carrier until the mass causes a constant rate of
,. travel of 0.4 mm/s (I in./min) throughout the test.
I
47. Machine Method (M)
47.1 Apparatus:
47.1.1 Testing Machine-A testing machine as described
in 6.1 of Test Methods D 412 shall be used for measuring the
r strength of adhesion. The head of the machine shall travel at
thc uniform rate of 50 mm (2.0 in.)/min.
47.1.2 Fixture-Any suitable fixture for holding the test
specimen to the upper head of the machine may be used
provided the direction of pull to cause separation shall be, at
all times during the test, as nearly perpendicular as possible,
that is, making a 90. angle with the top holding fixture. The
/, ~ tCst fixture shown in operation in Fig. 5 complies with the
.'
:..:
~
above and provides the case and simplicity of testing.8
i
~,
47.1.3 Grips-Any suitable grip may be used, provided it
.. . does not slip or rupture the rubber strip. The grip shown in
Fig. 5 complies and provides case and simplicity of opera-
tion.
48. Standard Test Specimen
48.1 Refer to 44.1 (same as used for static-mass test
method).
49. Laboratory Preparation of Standard Test Pieces
49.1 Refer to 45.1 through 45.1.4. (Same as used for
static-mass test method).
FIG. 12 Test Apparatus For Satic Mus Adhesion Test on
Rubber Tank Unlng SO. Procedure
50.1 Place the test specimen (Note 14) symmetrically in
45.1.1 Prepare contact area of hot-rolled, mild black steel the jaws attached to the fixed grip with the separating edge
in accordance with the method for securing adhesion that is toward the operator, as shown in Fig. 5. Before the load is
specified by supplier or that may be under investigation. Size applied, strip the rubber from the metal plate for a distance
of metal plate is 150 (6 in.) square and at least 3.4 mm (0.13 of approximately 2 mm (1/16 in.) by using a sharp knife (Note
in.) in thickness. Mask one end with approximately 25 mm 15). Place the tab in the grip and apply a steady load at the
(1.0 in.) wide pressure-sensitive tape. rate of 50 mm (2.0 in.)/min until separation is complete. Use
NOTF.12-[n cases where the 3.IS-mm (O.135-in.)thick metal is autographic recorder in order to show graphically the adhe-
permanently deformed during testing, a thicker metal plate may be used. sion values over the full length of the test specimen.
Likewise. a different grade of steel may be specified when agreen upon NOTE 14- This specimen lends itself to the determination of the
between the purchaser and the supplier. relative effect of environmental conditions on possible bond deteriora-
;~;:
;:':: 45.1.2 Apply unvulcanized rubber slabs. 6.3 :t 0.5 mm tion. Specimens may be exposed unstressed or under a constant,
. relatively low bond stress. It is recommended that one of the standard
" (0.25 :t 0.02 in.) thick to the prepared surface of the metal
ASTM environmental exposure conditions be used. Among those
plate. applicable are the fonowing: Test Methods D 471, D 572, D 573, D
;~.: NOTE 13-Other gages of rubber may be used to correspond to actual 1149, Practice G 23, and Method B 117. If environments other than the
ordered gage of tank lining stock if so noted on test report. above are used, they shaJJ be described completely. This should include
the conditions of the exposure such as time, temperature, etc.
45.1.3 Vulcanize the rubber in the same manner as NOTE 15-Stripping the rubber from the plate initially, and as
recommended by the rubber tank lining manufacturer; that n=sa.ry during the test, is done to observe more clearly adhesion to the
is, cured by exhaust steam, steam pressure, or chemical cure substrate rather than the tear strength of the stock.
and recommended time. temperature, and procedure.
45.1.4 After vulcanization, store the specimens at a tem- 51. Precautions
t:..
.
perature of 23 :t 2.C (73.4 :t 3.6.F) at least 16 h. Cut a 51.1 Tearing:
25-mm widestrip as shownin Fig. 9. 51.1.1 If, during a test, one of the parts begins to tear
instead of separating from the other part of the specimen, cut
46. Procedure the material being tom with a knife up to the surface of
46.1 Separate the part to be tested by hand at the masked contact between the two parts and start the test again.
~"
12
~;.>
..t ~;;.;,
. b.
~~j:
~-J~~~
r.~'
ASTM D429 81 .' 0'759510 0533452 bbb
.
4~ D 429
51
119.7amTII(0.38S-)
152.4 ( 6") ,
"UT\
I -tir- 3.43 ", (0.13S")
I
r
.........
\0
.........
E
1- - ---------
RUBBER
MASKED
AREA
r '7
N
!!
METAL
PLATE
l B SECTION 8-8
..
kNIFE CUT LI~.ES FOi;
~5tn'" (I"') ,\OIl'OSIC.'1 STR:P
"",
~
~. \~~t
::~~
13
Jf
oPYn9ht by the American Society For Testing & Materials
1UOct 0215:56:252003
-~;';
.
ffm
'-.i
1',. AST"')~2' &1..
.' - -
D7S~S1D DS33~S3 ST2..,
I
i
r.'
,
. 0 D 429
requirement with a force of 80 N (18 Ibo. between the maximum and minimum force values. The
r-~~.~~ 52.2 The true adhesion value is not determined in case the force so indicated, expressed in newtons per metre (or
I specimens repeatedly tear. The test, however, indicates that pounds-force per inch) is divided by the width measured in
I. the strength of adhesion exceeds the strength of the material 10.1 for separation at the rate used and is reported as the
and that the adhesion value is not less than the result adhesion value, as follows:
r- obtained. In cases of tearing, the results should be so N/m (lbf/in.)- force/actualwidth
designated.
L. 52.3 Adhesionvaluesmay differ betweendifferentpliesof Show both the force and actual width in the report.
the same article of plied construction and also at different
points along the same ply. The adhesion value of one ply to 54. Report
r another is taken as the average result of the test over a
reasonable distance of separation. When possible, a distance
54.1 The report shall include the following:
54.1.1 Results of the adhesion test expressed in accor-
of separation of at least 100 mm (4 in.) shall be used. dance with Sections 52 and 53,
54.1.2 All observations and recorded data on which the
53. Calculations results are based,
53.1 For the static-mass test method, report the adhesion 54.1.3 Date of manufacture or vulcanization of rubber, if
valve as separation rate per unit width under a stated force, known,
as follows: . 54.1.4 Date of test.
-mm/s. for 2S-mm width under_N force
54.1.5 Statement of the test method used (static-mass or
_in.!. for I-in. width under_lbf machine),
.:.:.. 54.1.6 Temperature of test room, and
If a width other than 25 mm (1 in.) was used, correct the 54.1.7 Dimensions of the test specimen.
separation by multiplying the rate by the quotient of actual
width per desired width as follows: 55. Precision and BiasI
or mmJ2Smm -- in.! I in.
55.1 Within laboratory testing and testing among labora-
tories has been started to generate data for the precision
Include both the rate and the actual width in the report. statement.
For the machine test method, the autographic chart
constitutes the report, but the value of the adhesion is 56. Keywords
determined by drawing on the chart the best average line 56.1 adhesion; metals; rubber
TheAtrwIcNl $o(;Iety for Testing 8IId MBterl8l8 takes no position retrptK;tIng the V81idity 01 any pal8nt rights tJSS8It8d In 00tIfIfICl1on
with any It.", mentioned in this stendard. ~ 01 /hi! stand8td are expressly advfstKJ that cffIt8rmintttlon 01 the V8IIrJIty01 any WCII
pIIt8nt rights, 8IId the risk oIlnfrlrPQel7Wlt01 ,uch rlghtr, are entirely their own respomib/iity.
T/JJ5mncJard 5Ubj«:t to r&vIs/orJat any tlmlJ by the I'8Spontlibie ~ COI7IIIIktMtIfId must be ffNIttwed -r fIvrI~ IIIId
I' notf8Vfaed, eitMI
" reapprowd or withdrawn.Yourcommentsare k7vited fIItIIer for f'INI5/orJ 01 this sWIdart1 Of for tKJdltiontll8tandarrJs
IIId ahould be addr8s:JtKJ to ASTM HetIdquIIrters. Youroomments will rec«ve careful comidenttlon at /I meeting 01 the reeponsJbIe
t8Chnlclll committee, wfIIch you 1I!IIY1IttIInd. you fesI thIIt your comment, havenot recMvttd /I fIIir hetuIng you Mould nIIJke your
vlew3/rnown to the ASTM CommIttge on~. " 1916 Race St., PhHlIdaiph/ll.‡ PA 19103.
.".
~~~\:
:':1'
;:~:~~
[
[
14
e~
fl::;:
..::~
Ipyright by the American Society For Testing & Materials
02 15:56:25 2003
Uill~
r~ .~~~~~ .~
:'~I;~ ~.:~.~~:;~:.. ~ . .~~;).:
"... .~'T'~.-_.
"', -.' _.4"""~-