Urdaneta City University

R3
Research Center

PANEL RATING FORM

TITLE

INVESTMENT PRACTICES OF YOUNG PROFESSIONALS

PRESENTER(S) EVALUATOR

SOLIS, NAVARRO, LOPEZ, VALERA LINDBERGH LENDL S. SORIANO, CPA

THESIS /MANUSCRIPT RUBRIC

CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 SCORE
Introduction/ *exceptional introduction that grabs interest of reader and *proficient introduction that is interesting *basic introduction that states topic but lacks *weak or no introduction of topic.
Thesis states topic. and states topic. interest. **paper’s purpose is unclear/thesis is
**thesis is exceptionally clear, arguable, well-developed, **thesis is clear and arguable statement of **thesis is somewhat clear and arguable. weak or missing.
and a definitive statement. position.
Quality of *paper is exceptionally researched, extremely detailed, *information relates to the main topic. *information relates to the main topic, few *information has little or nothing to do
Information/ and historically accurate. **paper is well-researched in detail and details and/or examples are given. with the thesis.
Evidence **information clearly relates to the thesis. from a variety of sources. **shows a limited variety of sources. **information has weak or no connection
to the thesis.
Support of *exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent connections *consistent connections made between *some connections made between evidence *limited or no connections made
Thesis/Analysis made between evidence and thesis. evidence and thesis and thesis. between evidence and thesis.
**excellent analysis. **good analysis. **some analysis. **lack of analysis.
Organization/ *exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough *clear and logical order that supports thesis *somewhat clear and logical development *lacks development of ideas with weak
Development of development of thesis with excellent transitions between with good transitions between and within with basic transitions between and within or no transitions between and within
Thesis and within paragraphs. paragraphs. paragraphs. paragraphs.

Conclusion *excellent summary of topic with concluding ideas that *good summary of topic with clear *basic summary of topic with some final *lack of summary of topic.
impact reader. concluding ideas. concluding ideas.
**introduces no new information. **introduces no new information. **introduces no new information.
Grammar/Usage/ *control of grammar, usage, and mechanics. *may contain few spelling, punctuation, *contains several spelling, punctuation, and *so many spelling, punctuation, and
Mechanics **almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and and grammar errors. grammar errors which detract from the grammar errors that the paper cannot be
grammatical errors. paper’s readability. understood.
TOTAL
PERCENT EQUIVALENT [(TOTAL SCORE/24) * 100%]
 ORAL DEFENSE RUBRIC
Criteria 4 3 2 1 Score
Organization  Information presented was complete and in logical  Information presented nearly complete  Some information presented out of  Poor sequence or illogical
order. and relevant sequence presentation of information
 Easy to follow  Presented in logical sequence  Had some pacing and timing problems  Some relevant information not
 Very well timed and spaced  Pace and timing appropriate presented
 Presentation not well times
Originality  Problem/purpose very creative or original and innovative  Problem/purpose fairly original or  Problem/purpose moderately original or  Problem/purpose limited in originality
ideas creative creative and creativity
 Design/approach appropriate or  Design/approach moderately appropriate  Design/approach only marginally
innovative or innovative appropriate or innovative
Discussion  Discussion was superior, accurate, engaging and  Discussion sufficient and with few errors.  Few inaccuracies and omissions  Major topics or concepts inaccurately
thought-provoking Greater foundation needed from past  Conclusions/summary generally supported described.
 Conclusions/summaries and recommendations work area by findings/outcomes  Considerable relevant discussion
appropriate and clearly based on outcomes  Conclusions/summary based on missing
outcomes and appropriate, included no  Conclusions/summary not entirely
recommendations supported by findings/outcomes
Delivery  Relied little on notes  Relied little on notes  Displayed interest and enthusiasm  Presenter unenthused, monotonous
 Expressed ideas fluently in own words  Displayed interest and enthusiasm  Read small parts of material and relied extensively on notes
 Genuinely interested and enthusiastic  Good voice, body language and  Occasionally struggled to find word  Vice, body language and
 Exceptional voice, body language and communication communication skills  Generally appropriate voice, body language communication skills sometimes
skills  Good quality of slides/presentation and communication skills inappropriate
 Slides/presentation quality materials greatly enhanced materials; enhanced  Moderate quality of presentation material;  Poor quality of slides/presentation
presentation/performance presentation/performance poor enhancement of material; poor enhancement of
presentation/performance presentation/performance
TOTAL
PERCENT EQUIVALENT [(TOTAL
SCORE/16) * 100%]

EVALUATOR’S COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________
EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE / DATE