THBT NATIONAL EXAM COMPUTERIZED TEST SHOULD BE ABOLISHED

1st Speaker Government/ Affirmative

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for the opportunity.

Next, I would like to give our motion today. Our motion today is “This House Believe That
National Examination Should be Abolished” . The definition of Motion is:

 Natinal examination: a standard evaluation system of primary and secondary

education in a country.
 Abolished: to get away, to erase element/particle from system.
 This whole definition is : We on affirmatife team, strongly support that the national
examination to get away or to be erased from education system in indonesia for
goodness all elements.
From the motions, we will give our theme line: That we as the affirmative team absolutely
agree that the national examination should be or be erased from education system.

Then our parameter today is that we just talk about the national examination is my country,
Indonesia.

Well continue to our team split: I’m Bety Anitasari as the first speaker I will deliver my
argument from impacts for students/students parent perspektive. And Abdi Rahim Yudani as
a second speaker, who will deliver arguments from negative impacts for schools and
education levels perspective. And last Indah Puspita Sari as a third speaker who will deliver
more proof and brief summary of our arguments.

Next ladies and gentelmen, I would like to give my argument from individual perspective,

we have 2 points:

First point is National Examination give negative impacts for student heathly, because
national examination be a standard graduation from the schools, students beharder to study
before ready to face UN. So far, national examination become a dilemma for student who
will past a exam. On one hard, it can make studentstudy hard before they are face to face with
the exam, but on the distrub then healtly many student had sick befor they are face to exam.

Monday, 16 april 2012, Hendry Kusria a student in SMK BNKP Sirambu Nias. Dead while
be was doing the national examination. Secretariat of minister of education in north Sumatera
provincesay that he was dead because have a complication discasise are brochitis, lier and
impertence forfrom before national examinationbeheld. He was supported from his parents to
do the national examination.

From the evidence it clearly that national examination they think they can pass or not and
whethe national examinations report release and they are not able to pass, they will get stress
and do many was, wrong or right way. For example, myfriends she got stress before she face
the national examination, and distreub her memorize because she forget she got wont to
havebreakfast in the morning because she too much think about preparation of national
examination.
We can see, national examination give negative impacts in individual perspective to students
healty, psycology and their parents, too so national examination should be abolished we his
to propose.

Thank you ladies and gentelmen, that enough for my arguments. It will be continued by the
second speaker later. J

1stSpeaker Opposition/Negative
Okay, ladies and gantleman. We are from the the opposition team, that against this motion.
We are strongly disagree that UN should be abolished. Before we deliver our points of
arguments I want to introduce our teamline and teamsplit.

Our team line is we just strongly oppose that UN should be abolished in my country
Indonesia.

And our team split I’m NURUL HUDA & YENNY SARIANTI we are the 1st speakers that
and refuse the affirmative side. And deliver argument in individual puspective and I MADE
GILER PERMADI as and speaker who will repuse the points affirmative and deliver
argument from economic, social, and education respective and last JELLIN ELISABETH
SIRINGO RINGO as the third speaker that rebuttals the all points of affirmative side and
brief summary our argument reply speech by me.
Next ladies and gantleman first, I will refuse the affirmative side and then YENNY
SARIANTI will give our points. We wiil show the good split, because we are the best
soulmate?

1. the first points was health. They said that UN give negative impacts for students healthy.
Because UN be a standart graduation from the school we halce to responses, it clearly that is
not on by UN be standart graduation from the school. But from 2010 in Indonesia. The
minister of education firm up the roles that graduation will determine from60% result of UN
40% result of UAS. And if we UN think that UN is only one to deternine the graduation, we
sure feel stress but factually is not true. UN is not only one to determine graduation UAS be
an important scone too.

2. their second point was psychology they said that national examination can disturb the
students psychology. We have to responses, first 1 the porpose of an exam in school, UAS or
UN is to practice our mental to pace the vations exam this is very usefull to continue higher
education abd get work doatest. Basically, UN and us are same, its differences are UN make
from capital by kemendigbud and UAS from school. Government try to show the fairmuse
for all students in Indonesia so they firm up UN disturb students psychology ? it’s just
parlittle part of all students in Indonesia it connot be areason to abolish UN. UN can give
positive impact for all elemen for the affirmative argument let’s us see best argument of
student, teacher, parents and government
Thank you nurul huda

Nexy ladies and gentelmen i will deliver our points in individual i perspective. We have there
points.
On the first point, UN can be score competition among the students. The score competition
whice pust the students to do their but, with the time, ways absolutely, study harder and take
a courses before fact the national examination and having a study guidance t the school
diligently.

For example in SMAN 1 SimpangEmpat from november all students have a study guedenc at
the school, to prepare to fact UN 6 subjects UN are math, indonesia, englis, biology, physic,
and chemistry that they pust prepare they do many various qustion with their teacher trough
vaious metode. We can see, it clearly that UN can when their ability, intellegency, and
competence trough a score competition of UN with high motivation and strong beliefe so, it
can fix the character of students especially in study harder to reach their dreams. UN also
helps in delceiping one’s own personally and convidence. On the second point, UN to
knowing the student’s competence, if we know our abillity and competence we will to
continue hig her education or get a work easity (university) and the third point, UN helps to
get sholat ship which will bring to have a good job i’iy senior in junior hing school, M.
Aditya Rulianyah get a sholar ship to continue senior hing school in Bandung because has got
the best score UN in SMP. And now he is in turlay to continue higher education that in
univesity because he get hest score in UN for senior its again from evidence.
See advantges UN for students are very WOW and they can be a motivation for me and for
you as a student, without exams student would be more and more stupid, lazier and less
motivated to learn. okey ladies and gentelmen, i’ll keep my stance and back to propose.

ThankYou J

2ndSpeaker Affirmative

2nd AFF ladies and gentelmen. I’m as the second speaker affirmative. At the first i want to
refuse the opposition side i have 3 points.

First you said that UN can be a score competition of UN he have responses. Do you think a
score competition of UN is good ?

No, a score competition is not good especially for our country indonesia in fact, you know
and you can see that many studen make cheats and buy the answer key before they face the
national exames they do that because they want to get best score of a score competion UN
like you have said.

Like you have said

Seconde you said that it can fix the character personalitiy and convidence students. We have
to response it really wrong. Basically UAN is a test thyat multiple choice but the roles of UN
are very make difficualt for students and it can their convidence be down and their spirit be
down too best they very fraid, nevous make cheats and buy the answer keys, they are not
good habit but dangerous habit, it is a simply pactise of dishone. It is absulutley can
andemine and decrease the moral students as the ypung generation.
Third, you said that UN can be used to knowing the students coupetence. We are to responses
chargingstudents with UN as graduation stipulation is not a best wary to improve studen’ts
competance. UN i have 6 subjects how the studens does not have potenly between 6 subject?
It is not fair for some students that have potaniy in other subject. Such as history, islamic and
other ladies.

I have refused the opp side and then i will deliver aguments in economic, social, education,
perspeetive. I have 3 poins on the first point. In economic perspective. From the first
implementation of un until last year, UN make big expediture for studens parents school and
goverment especially goverment to face UN and get best score students need many things and
they absolutly need a lot of money such as take a courses, buy tools, buy some books and
even the key answe too. They are not cheap especlally key answe, certain people sell the
answer kets before or while face the UN with expensive cost , that is about millior, we know
that many student’s pareats in indonesia have diffecully of condition of economy.

On the second point, in social perpective. Preparry UN need many time to study, practise and
prepare i they can make the student’s can not play they will always in house because they are
very fraide if they can pass UN or not it can make the students does not sleep and having
breap fast lunch and dinner regulary and if they have got bad result it will affect their feturu
from the fist implementation of UN until last year, we haven’t seen the result UN used
require the experrsive cost buy the result is only doubt and uncertainty as ne can see, last year
the education and caltuns minister, say government. Spent expensive cost that is about billion
ruplans and factually the billion rupians yield many cause of iligal way that be done by sone
school. In 2008 while the second day of UN there is a practise of dishonest from 16 teachers
SMAN Lubuk Pakam 2

From evidence it clearly that expensis cost that was spent by goverment doesnt have the
positive result for students beg to propose so i’m strongly agree with this motion beg to
perpose. J

2ndSpeaker Opposition
Hello ladies and gentleman . I’m the 2 nd speaker opposstion will oppose the affirmative
side.

National examination have positive impacts for all elements . so, moreover many country in a
world use national examination a standart graduation in their education development. So,
why national examination should be abolished? Is there better way if without national
examination ?i belive there is no, until a better form of demonstrating know legde comes
along , UN must be still best pleace at the first , I want to refuse the AFF side, you said that
UN

Make big expenditure for students parents like take a courses , buy books and key answer we
have to responses.that is not true . first students should not to take a courses because school
always help the study guidare after in every years.second, students is not advisable to by
book, ducation minister time give many helping for all schools in Indonesia, especially books
. so, students enough study ang borrow some books from library in their school.and key
answere . it is not necessary because it is a farlt in process of national examination, it needs
an extra socialitation so, students but it is not reason to abolish UN from curriculum of
education an Indonesia because there is still many students ta=hat do a true way to prepare
the national examination
On the second point , you said that UN doesn’t have positive result as a burgeon country ,
Indonesia still need time to adapt with national examination until Indonesia can make the best
method of help of national examination

With the result , kemendigbud can mapping the education levels and knoeing condition of
education development

Okay, I have refusedthe AFF side, noe I will deliver my argument education development in
Indonesia . national examination as a form that is used by government to slow a fairness to all
student in Indonesia

National examination made by professional person in kemendigbud far before the national
examination be help, kemendigbud give some lattice of national examination

10 SMA tahat get the highest scores in indonesia , according the evidence, government can
helping and make the comparison of education development in Indonesia

Secondly, must national examination government van devide education budget for every
school in Indonesia fairly we can see, last year SMAN that get the highest scores get many
advantages 8 of to 10 from government . Thank you J

3rd Speaker Affirmative

Hello ladies and gentlemen

I’m Sandri as the third speaker affirmative.

I have 7 points that I’ve found to rebut the opposition team;

– First, you said that national examination can be a score competititon among the students.

Do you think it’s good ? No for the students in Indonesia because it’s just a little part of
million of students in Indonesia use the honest manner to pass the exams.

Second, you said that national examination to knowing the student’s competence. Many
ways and procedure to knowing the student’s competence such as practice , debate, discuss
and many other.a potential of student not only determine trough the multiple choice test like
national examination. But in education, we need to know the process, procedure and their
practical in day life. National examination just give the doubt result so how can I know our
potential with the doubt result ?
– Third, you said that trough national examination government can knowing the education
development in Indonesia.

I have explained that an education need a process, just not a result .it is just make government
easily. But many elements that disagree with the result’s of national examination because the
know the real condition of national examination’s held.

– Forth, you said that national examination is an effective system for education in Indonesia.
Moreover many other countries that use the national examination as the graduation standard.

In basically, the national examination is good for education in their country. But it’s not an
effective for education system in Indonesia. Before use the national examination, The
government shoul fix the educational units’ quality in Indonesia such as the teacher quality,
Kemendigbud’s work and the other education’s system.

And fifth, you said that if a person pass the national examinations and get a good scores,
he/ she will get the scholarship. It is not fair for the other clever students that have good
potential too. It do not shows they that have got the good result use the honest manner. As we
know, facts in ndonesia shows many dishonest practices that for the national examination’s
held such as make cheats, use the electronic tool or use the key answer. Moreover, many
teachers do the dishonest practice too, to help their students while national examination
comes along. And more, how the students that have got the bad result ? it will cause the
problem m in their future. Moreover, if they didn’t pass the exam, it candisturb
theirpyschology.

60% : 40% it don’t helps because 60% is more that 40%.

– Sixth, you said that trough National examination, government can shows the fairness for all
students In Indonesia. That is not fairness. Let’s we compare the education in border and
underprivileged areas with big cities in Indonesia.in border and underprivileged areas, the
education facilities and learning resources are limited while the big cities have very complete
education faicilities and broad success to get the good learning.

– And last, you said that without exams students would be more and more stupid, lazier and
less motivated to learn. It’s really and really wrong because national examination that cause
the students would be more and more stupid, more and more lazy, more and more dishonest
and absolutely decrease the student’s quality in Indonesia. To know the student’s ability,
government should measure the process, just not a result.

In fact, what did we expect from national examination yield ?

National examination is compatible for the other country, but it is not compatible for
education’s system in Indonesia. We can graduate from school or not just by passingan exam,
which is held in 3-6days and with standard scores from education ministry.
How about learning process for 3 years that have ben done by students ? does it mean nothing
? and do you agree wth that ? No , absolutely No because because national examination will
broke the process which during this followed bystudents. A absolutely decrease the student’s
character.

National examination makes the negative impacts are more thin Indonesia.an the positive
impacts for all elements and also for education’s development in Indonesia.
So, we are the affirmative team strongly agree with this motion that National Examination
should be abolished.

Thank you J

3rdSpeaker Opposition
Jellyn as the third speaker opposition

Hello ladies and gentlemen

Now I’m jellyn Slingo-lingo as the third speaker will summarize our best argument for our
disagreeing to the motion.

At the first, I will refuse the opposition side. I have some points.

On the first point, give the negative impacts for student’s health ? it’s wrong. It is the little
part from all facts. There is still many students that feel advantages of national examination.

On the second point, they said that national examination can disturb the student’s
psychology. But you don’t see some students that have the true way to face the national
examination. It’s not a reason to abolish National Examination. Basically, national
examination is same with the other exams ? the other exam that in form essay but national
examination no! it is made in form multiple choice. Or do you have the other method if
without national examination ?

Then I will mention some advantages of national examination for all elements according
arguments that have been delivered by the 1stOpp and 2ndOpp.
First, For students :

1. knowing their ability and performance

2. national examination may encourage people to work and learn
3. create the competition score which push the students to their best
4. helps in developing one’s own personality and convidence
5. if a person pass the exam and got the good result, it helps to get scholarship which
will bring to have a good job.
Second, for schools :

1. Trough national examination the teachers can get the feedback of the student.
2. School can decide the best students untuil stupid students easily
 3. If the schools have the best students they will get the appreciation from government or
usually we call Kemendigbud
Third, For Government :

1. Mapping the quality of programme and or educational units

2. The basic of selection in to the next educational level
3. Give the appreciation for best shool and best students easily
So, should we abolish the national examnation ?

No , absolutely no. because without exams student would be more and more stupid, lazier and
less motivated to learn. With that argument that have delivered, we are from opposition team
strongly disagree with that motion. National examination should never be abolished.

Thank you J

Reply speech Opposition

Thanks you ladies and gentleman

Now I want to deliver our reply speech. Once again I say that, we are strongly disagree with
the motion that the UN should be abolished at the first, I want to deliver a summary of our
point of view.

1.UN give many advantages for all elements, students, school and government too.

2.UN is an effective system that compatible for condition of education in Indonesia

3. UN is a fairness that government has been showed for students

And just I wiil explain why the national exam should not be abolished

1. UN will increase students human resourcesquality

2.UN can be an indicator of students

3. and with UN the gon, in this case ministry of education and culture will be able to know
what aspect of study materials that need to be improved

4. as the burgeon country, indonesiaa, UN is compatible for education system in Indonesia.

According our point of view. We still strongly disagree if the UN should be abolished. There
is not other best solution for increase the aducation’s quality

Thanks you J
Reply Speech Affirmative

Reply speech Affirmative

Hello Ladies and Gentelment

Now I would like deliver our reply speech’s affirmative,.

Before I deliver it, I will to convince you that UN is not an effective way for education’s
development in Indonesia.

First,

1. For students, UN not give the positive impacts fairly.

2. you said that UN is an effective system, but in fact, UN is not an effective system for
education in Indonesia.

3. you also said that UN can increase the students human resources quality, but with a doubt
result, UN can decrease the students human resources quality, because trough UN many
students do the dishonest pradises such as buy the key answer.

So, what did we exped from national examination yield ? doubt result ? decreasing the
students character ?

No, absolutely no.

Before use the UN as a graduation standard national examination test to assess students
learning in primary high school until high school level, kemendigbud and ministry of edv.
And culture will search the best systems to fix the educational units in Indonesia.

One more we are from the aff team absolutlely agree with this motion that UN should be
abolished Thank you ladies and gentlemen

Good afternoon J