Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Series
Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
Associated With Gingival Recessions:
A Decision-Making Process
Giovanni Zucchelli,* Guido Gori,† Monica Mele,* Martina Stefanini,* Claudio Mazzotti,*
Matteo Marzadori,* Lucio Montebugnoli,‡ and Massimo De Sanctis§
A
thetic evaluations. non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL)
Methods: Five treatments were performed in 94 patients is described as the wear of the
with NCCLs associated with a single gingival recession: 1) tooth substance at the level of the
coronally advanced flap (CAF); 2) bilaminar procedure; 3) gingival one-third of the tooth due to
coronal odontoplasty plus restoration plus root odontoplasty reasons other than dental caries.1,2 Al-
plus CAF; 4) restoration plus CAF; and 5) restorative therapy. though an abrasion, due to mechanical
Clinical and esthetic evaluations made by the patient and an forces,3 plays an important role in the
independent periodontist were done 1 year after treatments. development of NCCLs, it is not the sole
Results: The satisfaction of the patient and periodontist cause, and it is generally accepted that
with esthetics was very high in all NCCL treatments and Miller the etiology of NCCLs is multifactorial,
Class gingival recessions. The patient satisfaction and evalu- involving other factors such as corro-
ation of root coverage and the periodontist evaluation of root sion, and possibly abfraction, as well.1,2
coverage were statistically correlated with color-match evalu- Main indications4 for the treatment of an
ations and not with the amount of root coverage clinically NCCL are: 1) esthetics, especially when
achieved in each patient. the lesion is pigmented and/or associated
Conclusion: The proposed approaches provided good with gingival recession; 2) dentin hyper-
esthetic appearance and correct emergence profile for the sensitivity, which may be the cause of
great majority of NCCLs associated with gingival recessions. discomfort/pain or faulty plaque control
J Periodontol 2011;82:1713-1724. for the patient; 3) caries/demineralization
with or without dentin hypersensitivity;
KEY WORDS and 4) bacterial plaque accumulation
Cemento-enamel junction; gingival recession; surgery. due to the shape and/or depth of abrasion
that make oral health care difficult/in-
* Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy. effective.
† Private practice, Rome, Italy. From a topographic standpoint, an
‡ Department of Stomatology, Bologna University.
§ Department of Periodontology, Siena University, Siena, Italy. NCCL can involve only the crown of the
tooth (enamel and/or coronal dentin) or
only the root surface (cementum and/or
root dentin), or it can occupy both the
crown and exposed root. When the NCCL
involves the root it is commonly associated
with gingival recession. An NCCL involving
doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110080
1713
Treatment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Volume 82 • Number 12
only the anatomic crown of the tooth should be MATERIALS AND METHODS
treated with restorative therapy, whereas an NCCL Ninety-four patients (45 males and 49 females; age
limited to the root surface should be treated with mu- range: 20 to 48 years; mean age: 34.6 – 9 years) were
cogingival surgery. The true clinical context is more enrolled in the study. Patients were selected on a con-
complex and, frequently, the NCCL involves both the secutive basis among individuals referred to the
crown and root, causing the disappearance of the School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, in the pe-
cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), which anatomi- riod between September 2007 and April 2008. The
cally separates the crown from the root.5 Thereafter, study protocol, questionnaires, and informed written
the main referring parameter for the selection of the consent is in full accordance with the ethical principles
therapeutic approach is no longer available. Fur- of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in
thermore, the anatomic distinction between crown 2000, were approved by an institutional review board
and root does not always correspond to the clinical and received the approval of the local ethics commit-
one and the entire exposed root surface is covered tee of Bologna University.
with soft tissues; this is the case with Miller Class6 All participants met the following study inclusion cri-
III and IV gingival recessions. Furthermore, different teria: 1) aged >18 years; 2) periodontally and system-
local conditions at a tooth with gingival recession ically healthy; 3) NCCL associated with a single Miller
may limit the amount of root coverage, even in the Class I, II, III, or IV gingival recession (rotated, malpo-
absence of the loss of interdental periodontal sup- sitioned, extruded teeth with or without occlusal wear
port5 (i.e., the loss of the tip of the papilla or tips of and teeth with some loss of papillae height5 were in-
papillae, tooth rotation, and tooth extrusion with cluded in Miller Class III); 4) no contraindications for
or without occlusal wear). The ideal treatment of a periodontal surgery; 5) not taking medications known
crown-radicular NCCL should consist of a combined to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing;
restorative/periodontal treatment. Completing the and 6) no previous periodontal surgery at involved
restorative therapy before mucogingival surgery sites. Teeth in which it was not possible to predetermine
leads to various clinical advantages for both proce- the MRC (the absence of a contact point in the tooth
dures: the restoration that can be easily performed with gingival recession and in the homologous contra-
and finished in an isolated (with rubber dam) field lateral one) or that had prosthetic crowns or composite
without interference of the soft tissues, and the restorations extending on the facial root surface were
root-coverage surgery is facilitated by the recon- excluded from the study. Patients who smoked >10
struction of the clinical crown emergence profile that cigarettes a day were also excluded. Recession defects
provides a stable, smooth, and convex substrate for associated with evidence of pulpal pathology were not
the surgical flap. included, and molar teeth were excluded.
The main clinical concern is when to finish the
composite restoration. Theoretically, the composite Study Design
filling should be placed when gingival tissues are stable This was a pilot, case-series study selecting different
after the healing process of the mucogingival root cov- treatment approaches for NCCL associated with gin-
erage procedure. This position was described as the gival recessions according to the topographic rela-
maximum root coverage level (MRC).7 This level is de- tionship between the MRC and NCCL. The study
fined as a line (line of root coverage) that should coin- protocol involved a screening appointment to verify
cide with the anatomic CEJ when it was not clinically the diagnosis and Miller classification6 of gingival
detectable on the tooth with Miller Class I or II gingival recession and eligibility (presence of an NCCL)
recession or would be more apical than the anatomic followed by initial therapy to establish optimal
CEJ when the ideal anatomic conditions to obtain plaque control and gingival health conditions, the
complete root coverage were not fully represented predetermination of MRC, the selection of one of five
(i.e., a Miller Class III gingival recession).5 treatment approaches, treatments, the early mainte-
A method to predetermine the MRC based on the nance phase, and the clinical and esthetic postoper-
calculation of the ideal height of the anatomic inter- ative evaluation 1 year after treatment. An esthetic
dental papilla was demonstrated to be reliable in postoperative evaluation was made by an indepen-
predicting the position of the soft tissue margin 3 dent examiner (CM) and by the patient based on a vi-
months after root coverage surgery.7 The aim of the sual analog scale (VAS) of 100 mm.8,9
present pilot, case series study is to suggest a deci-
sion-making process for treating NCCLs associated Diagnosis of NCCL and Classification of
with gingival recessions based upon the topographic Gingival Recessions
relationship between the MRC and NCCL and to as- NCCL was considered a loss of hard tissue localized in
sess patient and independent-periodontist esthetic the gingival one-third of the tooth.1,2 A diagnosis of an
evaluations. NCCL was made by using a periodontal probe that
1714
J Periodontol • December 2011 Zucchelli, Gori, Mele, et al.
allowed for the realization of the presence of the most asked to select among 100 scores (0 = very bad, 50 =
coronal step of the NCCL. The sharpness, depth, and average, and 100 = excellent) in terms of overall satis-
flat outline of the coronal step of the NCCL distinguished faction, color match, and root coverage.9,11,12
it from the anatomic CEJ. The examination of the profile
of the target tooth confirmed the diagnosis of an NCCL Objective Evaluation of Esthetics
and easily differentiated the coronal step of the NCCL The objective evaluation of root coverage (the pres-
from the CEJ. Gingival recessions were categorized into ence of exposed root or NCCL), color match between
four classes according to the Miller classification.6 hard (tooth/composite) and soft tissues, and tooth
emergence profile (capable of protecting the soft tissue
Initial Therapy margin and easy to clean by the patient) were scored at
After the screening examination, all patients re- the 1-year post-surgical evaluation visit by another ex-
ceived a session of prophylaxis including instruc- pert periodontist (CM), who was unaware on the treat-
tions in proper oral hygiene measures, scaling, and ment performed. The periodontist was asked to rate the
professional tooth cleaning with the use of a rubber root coverage, color match, and tooth emergence pro-
cup and a low-abrasive polishing paste. A coronally file among 100 VAS scores (0 = very bad, 50 = average,
directed roll technique was prescribed for teeth with and 100 = excellent).9,11,12
recession defects to minimize toothbrushing trauma
to the gingival margin. The treatment of the abra- Predetermination of MRC
sion/recession defect was not scheduled until the pa- The method used to predetermine the MRC in teeth
tient was able to demonstrate an adequate standard with NCCL associated with gingival recessions was
of supragingival plaque control. recently published by our research group.7 The
method was based on the calculation of the ideal
Clinical Measurements height of the anatomic interdental papilla.5 In brief,
All clinical measurements were carried out by a single, the ideal height of the papilla was measured as the dis-
masked examiner (MM) at baseline and 1 year post- tance between the point in which the CEJ crossed
surgery. MM did not perform the surgeries and was un- the facial mesial-distal line angle of the tooth (CEJ–
aware of the treatment assignment. Before the study, angular point) and the contact point. The CEJ–
the examiner was calibrated to reduce intraexaminer angular point is easily identifiable, even in a tooth
error (k >0.75) to establish reliability and consistency. with an NCCL, by elevating the interdental soft tis-
The full-mouth plaque score was recorded as the per- sues (with a probe or small spatula) and searching
centage of total surfaces (four aspects per tooth), for the interdental CEJ. Once the ideal papilla was
which revealed the presence of plaque.10 Bleeding measured, this dimension was replaced apically
on probing (BOP) was assessed dichotomously at starting from the tips of the mesial and distal papillae
a force of 0.3 N with a manual pressure-sensitive of the tooth with the recession defect. The horizontal
probe.i The full-mouth bleeding score was recorded projections on the recession margin of these mea-
as the percentage of total surfaces (four aspects per surements allowed for the identification of two points
tooth) that revealed the presence of BOP. that were connected by a scalloped line that repre-
The following clinical measurements were taken 1 sented the line of root coverage. The MRC was con-
week before the surgery and at the 1-year follow-up sidered the most apical extension of the line of root
at the mid-facial aspect of the study teeth: 1) local coverage. The predetermination of the MRC was per-
(facial) plaque score assessed dichotomously (yes/ formed by a single, masked examiner (MM) 1 week
no); 2) local (facial) bleeding score assessed dichoto- before the treatment. The examiner (MM) did not per-
mously (yes/no); 3) distance between the incisal mar- form the treatment.
gin and gingival margin (IM–GM); 4) probing depth
(PD), measured from the gingival margin to the bottom Determination of Treatment Alternatives
of gingival sulcus; and 5) height of keratinized tissue (NCCL types)
(KTH), which was the distance between the gingival The examiner categorized the gingival-NCCL defects
margin and mucogingival junction. The mucogingival in five types in relation to the position of the MRC with
junction was identified by means of Lugol staining. respect to the NCCL (Fig. 1): type 1; the MRC was lo-
Measurements of the IM–GM distance, PD, and KTH cated >1 mm coronal to the most coronal extension of
were performed by using a manual probe and were the NCCL, type 2; the MRC was located £1 mm coro-
rounded up to the nearest millimeter. nal to the most coronal extension of the NCCL, type 3;
the MRC was located in the deepest portion of the
Patient Esthetic Evaluation NCCL, type 4; the MRC was located apical to the
Patient satisfaction with esthetics was evaluated at i PCP UNC-15 probe tip, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL; equipped with a Brodontic
the 1-year follow-up visit based on a VAS. Patients were spring device, Dentramar, Waalwijk, The Netherlands.
1715
Treatment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Volume 82 • Number 12
deepest portion of the NCCL, and type 5; the MRC Type 2. NCCL type 2 was also a radicular NCCL
was located at the level or apical to the most apical ex- associated with a Miller Class I or II (Fig. 3) gingival
tension of the NCCL. recession, but in this case, there was not enough
space between the MRC and coronal step of the
Treatments NCCL to compensate for errors in the calculation
Conservative therapy was performed by a single, of the MRC and/or the post-surgical soft tissue
masked experienced restorative dentist (GG). Surgical shrinkage. Therefore, there was a risk of soft tissues
therapy was performed by a single, masked experi- collapse into the abrasion space. In this case too, the
enced periodontist (GZ). The adopted surgical tech- treatment of the NCCL/gingival recession was exclu-
niques consisted of a trapezoidal coronally advanced sively periodontal. The NCCL was mechanically and
flap (CAF) as a root coverage procedure13 or as cov- chemically treated during mucogingival surgery, but
ering flap of a subepithelial connective tissue graft in in this case, the root coverage procedure consisted in
the bilaminar technique.14 Five different treatment ap- a bilaminar technique (i.e., a connective tissue graft
proaches were adopted according to the NCCL type. covered by a CAF). The connective tissue graft (har-
Type 1. NCCL type 1 was a radicular NCCL asso- vested from the palate) was positioned inside the root
ciated with a Miller Class I (Fig. 2) or II gingival reces- concavity. The graft thickness filled the abrasion
sion. In this clinical situation, the amount of tooth space and prevented the collapse of the covering soft
surface comprised between the MRC and the coronal tissue flap inside it. The graft, by acting as a filler or
step of the NCCL was greater than the maximum mis- space-keeping inside the concave abrasion area,
take (1 mm) in the calculation of the MRC.7 The treat- provided stability and sustained the covering flap,
ment was exclusively periodontal. The NCCL/gingival which was coronally advanced 1 mm in excess with
recession was treated by means of a CAF root cover- respect to the MRC.
age surgical procedure during which the exposed root Type 3. NCCL type 3 was a crown-radicular NCCL
surface (including the NCCL) was treated mechani- associated with a Miller Class I (Fig. 4), II, or III gingival
cally (with hand and/or rotating instruments) to ob- recession. This was the most complex type, particu-
tain a hard, smooth, and regularly concave surface larly when the abrasion defect was deep (‡1 mm)
and chemically (24% EDTA for 2 minutes) to elimi- and narrow. A coronal (performed before the restor-
nate the smear layer. At the end of the surgery, the flap ative treatment) and radicular (performed during
was coronally advanced 1 mm in excess with respect the mucogingival surgery) odontoplasty was done
to the MRC. to reduce the depth and increase the height of the
Figure 1.
A chart illustrating the decision-making process for treating NCCLs associated with gingival recessions. A) Lateral view of an NCCL associated with
gingival recession. B) NCCL type 1: the MRC (arrow) was located >1mm coronal to the coronal step of the NCCL. The treatment consisted of a coronally
advanced pedicle flap. The space between the covering flap and the root concavity was occupied by blood coagulum (red area). C) NCCL type 2: the
MRC (arrow) was located at the level of the coronal step of the NCCL. The treatment consisted of a bilaminar technique: a connective tissue graft (pink area)
covered by a CAF . The graft acted as a space maintainer and sustained the CAF, preventing its collapse inside the abrasion space. D) NCCL type 3: the
MRC (arrow) was located in the deepest portion of the abrasion defect. The treatment consisted of a coronal and radicular odontoplasty composite
restoration (light-blue area) finished at the level of the MRC and CAF. The shallow space between the covering flap and root concavity, apical to the MRC, was
occupied by blood coagulum (red area). E) NCCL type 4: the MRC (arrow) was located apical to the deepest portion of the abrasion defect due to a
mild loss of papilla height (black area). The treatment consisted of a composite restoration (light-blue area) finished at the level of the MRC and CAF. The
shallow space between the covering flap and the root concavity apical to the MRC was filled with blood coagulum (red area). F) NCCL type 5: the MRC (black
arrow) was located at the level of the most apical extension of the NCCL due to a severe loss of papilla height (black area). The treatment consisted
of a composite restoration (light-blue area) finished at the level of the MRC and a repositioned flap or CAF.
1716
J Periodontol • December 2011 Zucchelli, Gori, Mele, et al.
NCCL. The coronal odontoplasty reduced the sharp- that improved the adhesion of the restorative material.
ness and depth of the coronal step of the NCCL and The exposed root surface apical to the MRC was used
was extended more and more occlusally with the in- for isolating the operative field by a rubber dam. If and
creasing depth of the hard tissue defect. The grinded when the NCCL reached or extended beyond the soft
area was restored with a composite filling that was tissue margin, it was necessary to the elevate the flap
extended up to the MRC. The coronal odontoplasty before performing the composite restoration to ex-
made at the level of the enamel created a long bevel pose some root surface apical to NCCL, which was
necessary for isolating the op-
erative field with the rubber
dam. The root odontoplasty
was performed during surgery
to further reduce the depth of
the NCCL. It was performed
with rotating burs and was com-
pleted with manual instruments
as far as a correct tooth emer-
gence profile was obtained. The
profile of the composite was
used as a guide for the correct
planning of the root surface.
Once the root odontoplasty
was completed, a pedicle flap
was coronally advanced 1 mm
in excess with respect to the
apical extension of the compos-
Figure 2. ite filling. The conservative fill-
NCCL type 1. A) Canine with gingival recession and a shallow radicular NCCL defect. The hard tissue defect ing facilitated the surgery by
was completely coverable with soft tissues. B) Root surface and NCCL area were mechanically treated providing a smooth, convex,
after a flap elevation. C) The flap was coronally advanced and sutured coronal to the CEJ. D) One-year and stable substrate for the cor-
follow-up after the CAF surgical technique: complete root coverage and a good emergence profile were
onal stabilization of the surgical
obtained. The NCCL defect appeared to be filled by an increased facial soft-tissue thickness.
flap.
Figure 3.
NCCL type 2. A) Canine with gingival recession and a deep NCCL defect. The defect was coverable with soft tissues. B) A connective tissue graft was
positioned and sutured within the NCCL space. The graft acted as space-maintaining material preventing the collapse of the covering flap inside the NCCL
defect. C) The flap was coronally advanced and sutured coronal to the CEJ. D) One-year follow-up after a bilaminar technique: complete root coverage
and a good emergence profile were achieved. The NCCL space was filled by the increased thickness of facial gingival tissues.
1717
Treatment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Volume 82 • Number 12
1718
J Periodontol • December 2011 Zucchelli, Gori, Mele, et al.
RESULTS
A total of 94 gingival recessions
were treated. There were 26 Miller
Class I recessions, 20 Miller Class
II recessions, 38 Miller Class III
recessions (including rotated or
malpositioned and extruded
teeth with or without an occlusal
abrasion and teeth with some
loss of papillae height), and 10
Miller Class IV recessions.
There were 15 (16%) type 1
NCCLs, of which 10 were associ-
ated with Miller Class I gingival
recessions, and five NCCLs were
associated with Miller Class II gin-
gival recessions; 18 (19%) type 2
Figure 5. NCCLs, of which eight were as-
NCCL type 4. A) Upper canine with a shallow NCCL and deep gingival recession. The NCCL area involved sociated with Miller Class I gin-
the crown and root causing the disappearance of the anatomic CEJ. The MRC was located apical to the gival recessions, and 10 NCCLs
deepest portion of the abrasion defect. B) A composite filling restored the deepest portion of the NCCL
were associated with Miller Class
defect and was finished at the level of the MRC. A good emergence profile was obtained. C) The portion
of the hard tissue defect apical to the MRC was planned after a flap elevation. D) The profile of the II gingival recessions; 27 (29%)
restoration well supported the CAF, which was sutured coronal to the most apical extension of the type 3 NCCLs, of which four were
composite filling. E) One-year follow-up after a composite restoration and CAF: a good tooth emergence associated with Miller Class I
profile was obtained. Note that the coronal portion of the abrasion space was filled with composite, gingival recessions, three were
whereas the apical part seemed to be filled by the increased thickness of the facial gingival tissue.
associated with Miller Class II gin-
gival recessions, and 20 NCCLs
were associated with Miller
expressed as means – SDs. General linear models Class III gingival recessions; 19 (20.2%) type 4
were fitted, and multiple regression one-way analysis NCCLs, of which four were associated with the Miller
of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with a Class I gingival recessions, two were associated with
split-plot design was used to evaluate the existence Miller Class II gingival recessions, and 13 were asso-
of any significant difference regarding local plaque, ciated with Miller Class III gingival recessions; and 15
local bleeding, IM–GM distance, KTH, and PD among (16%) type 5 NCCLs, of which five were associated
NCCL types or Miller Classes, time (1 year versus with Miller Class III gingival recessions, and 10 were
baseline), and the interaction between NCCL types associated with Miller Class IV gingival recessions.
or Miller Classes and time. In case of significance,
the Bonferroni t test was applied as a multiple-com- Oral Hygiene
parison test. After the initial oral hygiene phase and at post-treatment
After controlling for standardized skewness and examinations, all patients showed low frequencies of
standardized kurtosis values for satisfaction, the plaque-harboring tooth surfaces (full-mouth plaque
color match and root coverage by the patient and score <20%) and bleeding gingival units (full-mouth
color match, emergence profile, and root coverage bleeding score <15%), indicating a good standard of
by the periodontist were all within the range expected supragingival plaque control during the study period.
for data from a normal distribution; one-way ANOVA The results of fitting a general linear statistical
was used to evaluate the presence of any significant model relating local plaque to NCCL types, time,
difference among NCCL types and Miller Classes. and the interaction between NCCL types and time
The Fisher least-significant difference procedure was showed high R2 statistics indicating that the model
used to discriminate among means. as fitted was significant (F = 1.6; P <0.02) and ex-
Multiple linear regression models were fitted to plained 66% of the variability. A significant relation-
describe the relationship between patient overall ship was found regarding time-related differences
satisfaction as well as patient and periodontist eval- (F = 26.8l P <0.01), whereas no significant difference
uations of root coverage and patient and periodon- was found concerning NCCL types or the interaction
tist evaluations of color match and root coverage between NCCL types and time. At baseline, local (fa-
(in millimeters) that were clinically achieved with cial) plaque was demonstrated in 26 (28%) treated
the surgery. sites. Local bleeding was recorded in 22 (23%) sites.
1719
Treatment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Volume 82 • Number 12
1720
J Periodontol • December 2011 Zucchelli, Gori, Mele, et al.
Figure 7.
Baseline frontal view : A) NCCL type 1. B) NCCL type 2. C) NCCL type 3. D) NCCL type 4. E) NCCL type 5.
Figure 8.
One-year frontal views. A) NCCL type 1. B) NCCL type 2. C) NCCL type 3. D) NCCL type 4. E) NCCL type 5.
Table 1.
Mean Root Coverage
NCCL type 1 2 3 4 5
3.06 – 0.79 3.33 – 0.59 1.92 – 0.54 1.47 – 0.51 0.6 – 0.73
Miller Class 1 II III IV
2.69 – 0.67 3.1 – 1.07 1.55 – 0.6 0.4 – 0.69
with respect to the baseline mean value (1.1 – statistical significant (F = 18.6 and P <0.01 for patient
0.3 mm). satisfaction; F = 11.8 and P <0.01 for patient root cov-
erage). However, in both models, the statistical signif-
Patient Satisfaction(VAS) icance was only reached by the color match (F = 36.9
Patient satisfaction with esthetics was very high in all and P <0.01 for patient satisfaction; F = 22.8 and P
types of treatment. Results from the multiple-regres- <0.01 for patient root coverage) and not by the root
sion ANOVA relating the patient satisfaction and pa- coverage (in millimeters) clinically achieved in each
tient evaluation of root coverage to the color match patient. No statistically significant difference between
and root coverage clinically achieved in each patient NCCL types and Miller Class gingival recessions
(in millimeters) showed that both the models were was demonstrated in terms of the patient overall
1721
Treatment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Volume 82 • Number 12
Table 2.
Mean Facial Keratinized Tissue Increase
NCCL type 1 2 3 4 5
0.53 – 0.63 1.55 – 0.98 0.73 – 0.77 0.42 – 0.6 0.53 – 0.83
Miller Class 1 II III IV
0.84 – 0.92 1.3 – 0.92 0.55 – 0.82 0.3 – 0.67
Table 3.
ence (F = 4.3; P <0.01) among Miller Classes in the
Patient Esthetic Evaluation periodontist evaluation of root coverage. However,
the results from multiple-range tests showed that only
NCCL Type (n patients) Miller Class IV was responsible for the statistical signif-
icant difference. No statistically significant difference
Parameters 1 (15) 2 (18) 3 (27) 4 (19) 5 (15)
among Miller Classes was found in the periodontist
Overall satisfaction evaluation of the color match and tooth emergence
VAS ‡80 15 17 26 17 13 profile.
50£ VAS <80 0 1 1 2 2
VAS <50 0 0 0 0 0 DISCUSSION
Color match The ideal treatment of a crown-radicular NCCL
VAS ‡80 15 17 25 17 13 should consist in a combined restorative/periodontal
50£ VAS <80 0 1 2 2 2 treatment in which the restorative therapy is com-
VAS <50 0 0 0 0 0 pleted before mucogingival surgery. This treatment
Root coverage facilitates both procedures: the restorative treat-
VAS ‡80 14 16 25 17 12 ment, which can be performed in an well-isolated op-
50£ VAS <80 1 2 2 2 3 erative field because of the apical dislocation of the
VAS <50 0 0 0 0 0 soft tissue margin and the periodontal surgery by giv-
ing a hard, stable, and convex substrate to the CAF.
The improved knowledge of the prognosis of root cov-
erage changed the therapeutic approach of an NCCL
satisfaction, color match, and root coverage VAS associated with gingival recession. From a static ap-
scores. Patient esthetic evaluations in different NCCL proach in which the treatment selection was exclu-
types are shown in Table 3. sively based upon the topographical relationship
between the NCCL and CEJ (fixed referring parame-
Periodontist Evaluation(VAS) ter), it passed to a dynamic approach that takes into
Periodontist evaluations of root coverage, color match, consideration the variability in root coverage. The
and tooth emergence profile were very high in all types method used in the present study to predetermine
of treatment. The results from multiple regression the MRC was demonstrated to be reliable in predicting
ANOVA relating the periodontist evaluation of root the position of the soft tissue margin after root cover-
coverage to the color match and root coverage clini- age surgery.7 It allowed for the identification of a scal-
cally achieved in each patient (in millimeters) showed loped line (MRC) in all teeth affected by gingival
that the model was highly statistically significant (F = recession that could be used as the clinical CEJ
51.2; P <0.01). However, statistical significance was (cCEJ)5 for the selection of the therapeutic approach
only reached by the color match (F = 99.4; P <0.01) of the NCCL associated with gingival recessions:
but not by the root coverage clinically achieved in when the cCEJ was located coronal to the NCCL,
each patient (F = 2.8; not significant). a periodontal approach (mucogingival surgery) was
No statistically significant difference among NCCL indicated; on the contrary, when the cCEJ was
types was found in the periodontist evaluation of root located apical to the most coronal extension of the
coverage, color match, and tooth emergence profile. NCCL, a combined restorative–periodontal ap-
Periodontist esthetic evaluations in different NCCL proach is recommended. In the latter case, the cCEJ
types are shown in Table 4. Results from one-way AN- can be used as a guideline for the apical preparation of
OVA demonstrated a statistically significant differ- the composite filling.5
1722
J Periodontol • December 2011 Zucchelli, Gori, Mele, et al.
1723
Treatment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Volume 82 • Number 12
1724