Professional Documents
Culture Documents
51%
total GWP per material 49%
total GWP per material
image courtesy of Hacker When including biogenic carbon, glulam and CLT reduce
Glulam
27%
and CLT 22% Glulam26%and CLT -7 % the GWP.
Concrete & CMU 0% 76% Concrete & CMU 96%
Whole Building Life District Office 0%
Mass Global Warming
Acidification Metals
Eutrophication
Smog Formation Non-renewable
Mass 2%
Global Warming
Acidification Metals
Eutrophication Smog Formation Non-renewable 3%
Potential Potential Potential Potential Energy
B6-B7 transport
operational
energy & water
GWP per life stage module GWP per life stage module Transport distance assumptions
CLT & Glulam: 321 km
Concrete: 24 km
Steel: 434 km
cradle-to-cradle
cradle-to-gate
acidification
Potential
Benefits and
Loads eutrophication Whole Building:
Product Stage Transport Construction Use End-of-Life
Inputs: fuel, electricity, WBLCA (whole building life cycle assessment)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 B1-B5 C1-C5 D ozone depletion EBD (environmental building declaration)
water, raw materials, etc.
raw material manufacturing & transport construction & use, deconstruction, recovery, reuse,
LIFE CYCLE STAGES & supply production to site installation maintenance, waste processing, & & recycling smog formation
repair, and disposal Outputs: air emissions, water
MODULES replacement
emissions, solid waste emissions global warming potential
(embodied carbon)
Individual Product / Material:
primary energy demand LCA (life cycle assessment)
(embodied energy) EPD (environmental product declaration meeting
B6-B7 the requirements of a specific product category
operational rules document)
energy & water
Conducted under a research grant from the TallWood Design Institute, funded by the USDA Agricultural Research Service under award # USDA-ARS #58-0204-6-002 Research Team: Alison Kwok, Hannah Zalusky, Isabel Rivera, Lindsay Rasmussen, and Hannah McKay